As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 9, 2013

Registration No. 333-        

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



 

FORM S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933



 

PHARMATHENE, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its Certificate of Incorporation)



 

   
Delaware   2384   20-2726770
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

One Park Place Suite 450
Annapolis, MD 21401
(410) 269-2600

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)



 

Eric I. Richman
Chief Executive Officer
PharmAthene, Inc.
One Park Place
Suite 450
Annapolis, MD 21401
(410) 269-2600

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)



 

Copies to:

 
Jeffrey A. Baumel, Esq.
Dentons US LLP
1221 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10020-1089
(212) 768-6700
  Stephen M. Graham, Esq.
Fenwick & West LLP
1191 Second Avenue, 10th Floor
Seattle, Washington 98101
(206) 389-4510


 

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this registration statement and upon completion of the merger described herein.

If the securities being registered on this Form are being offered in connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the following box: o

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

     
Large accelerated filer o   Accelerated filer x   Non-accelerated filer o   Smaller reporting company o
          (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)     

If applicable, place an X in the box to designate the appropriate rule provision relied upon in conducting this transaction:

Exchange Act Rule 13e-4(i) (Cross-Border Issuer Tender Offer) o

Exchange Act Rule 14d-1(d) (Cross-Border Third-Party Tender Offer) o

 

 


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

       
Title of each class of securities to be registered(1)   Amount to be registered(2)   Proposed maximum offering price per unit   Proposed maximum aggregate offering price(3)   Amount of registration fee(4)
Common stock, par value $0.0001 per share     60,316,126       N/A     $ 18,010     $ 2.46  

(1) Relates to common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, of PharmAthene, Inc. issuable to holders of securities of Theraclone Sciences, Inc. in the proposed merger of Taurus Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of PharmAthene, with and into Theraclone, with Theraclone as the surviving subsidiary.
(2) Based on the estimated maximum number of shares of PharmAthene common stock to be issued in the merger. The actual number of shares issued in the merger may be less than the number of shares being registered.
(3) Estimated solely for purposes of calculating the registration fee required by Section 6(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and computed pursuant to Rule 457(f)(2) of the Securities Act. Theraclone is a private company, no market exists for Theraclone’s securities and Theraclone has an accumulated capital deficit. Therefore, the proposed maximum aggregate offering price is one third of the aggregate par value of Theraclone’s common stock to be acquired in the proposed merger in accordance with the assumptions disclosed in footnote (2) above, up to 54,028,152 shares, and computed as of September 3, 2013, the latest practicable date prior to the date of filing of this registration statement.
(4) Determined in accordance with Section 6(b) of the Securities Act at a rate equal to $136.40 per $1,000,000 of the proposed maximum aggregate offering price.

The Registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The information in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation is not complete and may be changed. A registration statement relating to the securities described in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These securities may not be sold nor may offers to buy these securities be accepted until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation is not an offer to sell nor is it soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

PRELIMINARY AND SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED SEPTEMBER 9, 2013

[GRAPHIC MISSING]

 

[GRAPHIC MISSING]

PharmAthene is furnishing this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation to the holders of common stock of PharmAthene, Inc., or PharmAthene, and to the holders of capital stock of Theraclone Sciences, Inc., or Theraclone.

As previously announced, the boards of directors of PharmAthene and Theraclone have each unanimously approved the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 31, 2013, or the Merger Agreement, by and among PharmAthene, Theraclone, Taurus Merger Sub, Inc., or Merger Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of PharmAthene and Steven Gillis, Ph.D., as Securityholders’ Representative, pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into Theraclone and Theraclone will survive the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of PharmAthene. Upon completion of the merger, the PharmAthene security holders will own 50% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, and Theraclone security holders will own 50% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, in each case, on an as converted and fully diluted basis but excluding PharmAthene warrants and options with an exercise price of more than $2.50 per share. Based on the number of outstanding securities of each company as of September 3, 2013, (i) if no PharmAthene or Theraclone options or warrants are exercised prior to the completion of the merger, PharmAthene and Theraclone security holders would own, respectively, approximately 54.1% and 45.9% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the combined company and (ii) if PharmAthene warrants and options with an exercise price of more than $2.50 per share are exercised, to the extent such exercises occur, PharmAthene and Theraclone security holders could own, respectively, between approximately 51.5% and 50.0% and 48.5% and 50.0% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, on a fully diluted basis.

PharmAthene is soliciting proxies for use at a special meeting of stockholders to consider and vote upon the following proposals: (i) to approve the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock in the merger; (ii) to approve an amendment to PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of common stock that PharmAthene may issue; (iii) to elect nine persons to serve on the Board of Directors of PharmAthene until PharmAthene’s next annual meeting of stockholders; (iv) to adopt an amendment to PharmAthene’s Bylaws to require, for a period to expire no later than July 31, 2015, the approval of at least 66 2/3% of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors to remove Clifford J. Stocks, the expected Chief Executive Officer of the combined company; and (v) to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of any of the proposals.

Theraclone is soliciting written consents from its stockholders to consider and vote on a proposal to approve the merger and adopt and approve the Merger Agreement and the other transactions contemplated thereby.

PharmAthene’s common stock is listed on the NYSE MKT LLC under the symbol “PIP”. On            , 2013, the last trading day before the date of this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation, the closing sales price per share of PharmAthene’s common stock was $    . Theraclone is a privately-held company, and there is currently no public market for its securities.

This proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation provides you with detailed information about PharmAthene, Theraclone, the merger and the Merger Agreement. Please give all of the information in this proxy statement/ prospectus/consent solicitation your careful attention. Please pay particular attention to the section entitled “RISK FACTORS” beginning on page 35 for a discussion of the risks related to the merger, the combined company following completion of the merger, and the business and operations of each of PharmAthene and Theraclone.

PharmAthene and Theraclone are excited about the opportunities that the proposed merger brings to both PharmAthene and Theraclone stockholders and thank you for your consideration and continued support.

 

Eric I. Richman
Chief Executive Officer
PharmAthene, Inc.
 
Clifford J. Stocks
Chief Executive Officer

Theraclone Sciences, Inc.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of the PharmAthene common stock to be issued pursuant to the merger or determined if this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

This proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation is dated            , 2013 and is first being mailed or otherwise delivered to stockholders of PharmAthene and Theraclone on or about            , 2013.


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

REFERENCES TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

PharmAthene has supplied all information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation relating to PharmAthene and Theraclone has supplied all information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation relating to Theraclone. This proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation incorporates or refers to important business and financial information about PharmAthene that is not included in or delivered with this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation. Such information is available without charge to stockholders of PharmAthene upon written request at the following address: PharmAthene, Inc., One Park Place, Annapolis, MD 21401, c/o Corporate Secretary, or by telephone (410) 269-2600. If you would like to request documents from Theraclone, please send a request to: Theraclone Sciences, Inc., Seattle Life Sciences Building, 1124 Columbia Street, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98104, Attention: Chief Financial Officer, or by telephone at (206) 805-1600.

If you would like to request documents from PharmAthene, please do so at least five business days before the PharmAthene special meeting, or by            , 2013, in order to receive them before the PharmAthene special meeting. If you would like to request documents from Theraclone, please do so at least five business days before you deliver your written consent, which must be delivered to Theraclone by            , 2013. See the section entitled “WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.”


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PharmAthene, Inc.
 
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held On            , 2013

Dear PharmAthene Stockholder:

A special meeting of the stockholders of PharmAthene, Inc. will be held on            , 2013 at     , local time, at the offices of Dentons US LLP at 1301 K Street, NW, Suite 600, East Tower, Washington, DC 20005 for the following purposes:

1. To consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the issuance of PharmAthene common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, in the merger contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 31, 2013, by and among PharmAthene, Inc., Theraclone Sciences, Inc., Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of PharmAthene and Steven Gillis, Ph.D., as Securityholders’ Representative, a copy of which is attached as Annex A to the proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation accompanying this notice;
2. To consider and vote upon a proposal to approve an amendment to PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of common stock that PharmAthene may issue;
3. To elect nine persons to serve as directors until PharmAthene’s next annual meeting of stockholders or until their respective successors are elected and qualified;
4. To approve an amendment to PharmAthene’s Bylaws to require, for a period to expire no later than July 31, 2015, the approval of at least 66 2/3% of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors to remove Clifford J. Stocks, the expected Chief Executive Officer of the combined company; and
5. To consider and vote upon a proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of any of the proposals.

Stockholders also will consider and act on any other matters that may properly come before the special meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof, including any procedural matters incident to the conduct of the special meeting.

PharmAthene’s Board of Directors has fixed            , 2013 as the record date for the determination of PharmAthene stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the PharmAthene special meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the PharmAthene special meeting. Only holders of record of PharmAthene common stock at the close of business on the PharmAthene record date are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the PharmAthene special meeting. At the close of business on the record date, PharmAthene had      shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.

Your vote is important. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the PharmAthene common stock outstanding, entitled to vote on the proposal and present in person or represented by proxy, is required for the approval of PharmAthene Proposal Nos. 1, 4 and 5. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the PharmAthene common stock outstanding and entitled to vote on the proposal is required for the approval of PharmAthene Proposal No. 2. The affirmative vote of holders of a plurality of the votes cast of the PharmAthene shares of common stock outstanding, entitled to vote on the proposal and present in person or represented by proxy, is required for the election of directors set forth in PharmAthene Proposal No. 3.

Even if you plan to attend the PharmAthene special meeting in person, PharmAthene requests that you complete, sign and return the enclosed proxy card or otherwise provide your proxy and thus ensure that your shares will be represented at the PharmAthene special meeting if you are unable to attend. If you sign, date and mail your proxy card or otherwise provide your proxy without indicating how you wish to vote, your proxy will be counted as a vote in favor of PharmAthene Proposals Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5 and for each of the nominees set forth in PharmAthene, Proposal No. 3. If you fail to return your proxy card, or otherwise provide your proxy the effect will be that your shares will not be counted for


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the PharmAthene special meeting. If you do attend the PharmAthene special meeting and wish to vote in person, you may withdraw your proxy and vote in person.

The PharmAthene Board of Directors has determined that each of the Proposals noted above is advisable and in the best interest of PharmAthene and its stockholders and has unanimously approved each Proposal. The Board of Directors of PharmAthene unanimously recommends that PharmAthene stockholders vote “FOR” PharmAthene Proposals Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5 and “FOR” each of the nominees set forth in PharmAthene Proposal No. 3.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Jordan P. Karp
Corporate Secretary
Annapolis, Maryland
           , 2013


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone Sciences, Inc.
Seattle Life Sciences Building
1124 Columbia Street, Suite 300
Seattle, WA 98104

NOTICE OF SOLICITATION OF WRITTEN CONSENT

Dear Theraclone Stockholder:

Theraclone Sciences, Inc., a Delaware of corporation, has entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of July 31, 2013, by and among PharmAthene, Inc., Taurus Merger Sub, Inc., Theraclone Sciences, Inc. and Steven Gillis, Ph.D., as Securityholders’ Representative, a copy of which is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation, pursuant to which Merger Sub would merge with and into Theraclone, with Theraclone surviving the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of PharmAthene, and pursuant to which PharmAthene would issue shares of common stock to Theraclone’s stockholders.

This proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation is being delivered to you on behalf of Theraclone’s Board of Directors to request (i) that holders of Theraclone common stock and preferred stock as of            , 2013, or the record date, execute and return written consents to approve the merger and adopt and approve the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and (ii) that holders of Theraclone preferred stock as of the record date, execute and return written consents to approve the conversion of the shares of Theraclone preferred stock into shares of Theraclone common stock on a one-for-one basis.

As a record holder of outstanding Theraclone common stock or preferred stock on the record date, you are urged to complete, date and sign the enclosed written consent and promptly return it to Theraclone. Theraclone’s Board of Directors has set            , 2013 as the target final date for receipt of written consents. Theraclone reserves the right to extend the final date for receipt of written consents without any prior notice to stockholders.

This proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation describes the merger agreement and the actions to be taken in connection with the merger and provides additional information about the parties involved. Please give this information your careful attention. A summary of the appraisal rights that may be available to you is provided in the section entitled “THE MERGER — Appraisal Rights.”

Written consents are required from (i) the holders of at least (a) a majority of the outstanding shares of Theraclone common stock and preferred stock, voting together as a single class on an as-converted-to-common stock basis and (b) a majority of the outstanding shares of the Theraclone preferred stock, voting together as a single class on an as-converted-to-common stock basis each outstanding on the applicable record date, for the merger, the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and (ii) the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of Theraclone preferred stock for the conversion of the shares of Theraclone preferred stock into shares of Theraclone common stock on a one-for-one basis.

Regardless of the number of shares you own, your written consent is important. Please complete, date and sign the written consent furnished with this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation and return it promptly to Theraclone by one of the means described in “MATTERS TO BE PRESENTED TO THERACLONE’S STOCKHOLDERS — Submission of Consents.” You may change or revoke your consent to the proposal at any time before the consents of holders of a sufficient number of shares to approve and adopt such proposal have been filed with Theraclone’s Corporate Secretary.

THE THERACLONE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS CAREFULLY CONSIDERED THE MERGER AND THE TERMS OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND HAS DETERMINED THAT THE MERGER IS FAIR, ADVISABLE AND IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THERACLONE AND ITS STOCKHOLDERS. ACCORDINGLY, THE THERACLONE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THERACLONE STOCKHOLDERS APPROVE THE MERGER AND ADOPT AND APPROVE THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED THEREBY AND THERACLONE PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS APPROVE THE CONVERSION OF THE SHARES OF THERACLONE PREFERRED STOCK INTO SHARES OF THERACLONE COMMON STOCK ON A ONE-FOR-ONE BASIS BY EXECUTING AND DELIVERING THE WRITTEN CONSENT FURNISHED WITH THIS PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS/CONSENT SOLICITATION.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
 
Russ Hawkinson
Corporate Secretary

Seattle, Washington
            , 2013


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER     1  
Questions and Answers Regarding the Merger     1  
Questions and Answers for PharmAthene Stockholders     5  
Questions and Answers for Theraclone Stockholders     6  
SUMMARY     10  
The Companies     10  
The Merger     11  
Reasons for the Merger     11  
Risks Related to the Merger     12  
Opinion of PharmAthene’s Financial Advisor     13  
Overview of the Merger Agreement     13  
PharmAthene Voting Agreement     16  
Theraclone Voting Agreement     16  
Stockholder Approval of the Merger     16  
Directors and Officers of PharmAthene Following the Merger     17  
Interests of PharmAthene’s Directors and Officers in the Merger     17  
Interests of Theraclone’s Directors and Officers in the Merger     19  
Assumption of Theraclone Stock Options and Warrants and Theraclone 2004 Option Plan     19  
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger     20  
Regulatory Approvals     20  
Anticipated Accounting Treatment     20  
Appraisal Rights     21  
Comparison of Stockholder Rights     21  
SELECTED HISTORICAL AND UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL DATA     22  
Selected Historical Financial Data of PharmAthene     22  
Selected Historical Financial Data of Theraclone     24  
Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Data of PharmAthene and Theraclone     25  
Comparative Historical and Unaudited Pro Forma Per Share     32  
MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION     33  
PharmAthene     33  
Theraclone     33  
Dividends     34  

i


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
RISK FACTORS     35  
Risks Related to the Proposed Merger     35  
Risks Related to the Combined Company Following the Merger     38  
Risks Related to PharmAthene     41  
Risks Related to Theraclone     56  
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS     69  
MARKET AND INDUSTRY DATA     71  
THE SPECIAL MEETING OF PHARMATHENE STOCKHOLDERS     72  
General     72  
Date, Time and Place     72  
Purposes of the PharmAthene Special Meeting     72  
Recommendations of the PharmAthene Board of Directors     72  
Record Date and Voting Power     73  
Voting and Revocation of Proxies     73  
Quorum and Required Vote     74  
Solicitation of Proxies     74  
Other Matters     74  
MATTERS BEING SUBMITTED TO A VOTE OF PHARMATHENE STOCKHOLDERS     75  
PharmAthene Proposal No. 1 — The Issuance of Shares of PharmAthene Common Stock in the Merger     75  
PharmAthene Proposal No. 2 — Approval of an Amendment to PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation to Increase the Number of Shares of Common Stock That
PharmAthene May Issue
    76  
PharmAthene Proposal No. 3 — Election of Directors     77  
PharmAthene Proposal No. 4 — Amendment to Bylaws Limiting the Ability of the Board of Directors to Remove the Chief Executive Officer     78  
PharmAthene Proposal No. 5 — Approval of Possible Adjournment of the PharmAthene Special Meeting     79  
MATTERS TO BE PRESENTED TO THERACLONE’S STOCKHOLDERS     81  
Theraclone Stockholder Action by Written Consent     81  
Shares Entitled to Consent and Consent Required     81  
Submission of Consents     81  
Executing Consents; Revocation of Consents     82  
Solicitation of Consents; Expense     82  
Recommendation of the Theraclone Board     82  
Voting and Other Agreements     82  

ii


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
THE MERGER     83  
General     83  
Background of the Merger     84  
PharmAthene Reasons for the Merger     89  
Theraclone Reasons for the Merger     93  
Opinion of Leerink Swann     94  
Interests of PharmAthene’s Directors and Officers in the Merger     100  
Employment Agreements and Severance and Change in Control Agreements     102  
Interests of Theraclone’s Directors and Officers in the Merger     109  
Regulatory Approvals     111  
NYSE MKT Listing of PharmAthene Common Stock     111  
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger     111  
Anticipated Accounting Treatment     111  
Appraisal Rights     111  
THE MERGER AGREEMENT     115  
General     115  
Effective Time of the Merger     115  
Merger Consideration     115  
Indemnification Obligations     117  
Directors and Officers of PharmAthene following the Merger     117  
Conditions to Completion of the Merger     118  
No Solicitation     119  
Stockholder Approval     121  
Covenants; Conduct of Business Pending the Merger     121  
Other Agreements     124  
Termination     125  
Termination Fee     126  
Representations and Warranties     127  
Amendment     128  
VOTING AND OTHER AGREEMENTS     129  
Voting and Lock-up Agreements     129  
Theraclone Post-Closing Lock-up Agreement     129  
Board Composition Agreement     130  
MANAGEMENT OF THE COMBINED COMPANY     131  
Executive Officers     131  
Non-Employee Directors     132  
Key Employee     134  

iii


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS OF PHARMATHENE     135  
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS OF THERACLONE     138  
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS OF THE COMBINED COMPANY     140  
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS     142  
PharmAthene Transactions     142  
Theraclone Transactions     142  
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Financing     143  
Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock Financing     143  
CERTAIN MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER     144  
PHARMATHENE’S BUSINESS     147  
Overview     147  
Background of PharmAthene     147  
Business Concept and Strategy     148  
Process and Analytical Development, and Manufacturing     159  
Intellectual Property     160  
Competition     161  
U.S. Government Contracts     162  
Employees     163  
Financial Information by Geographic Area     163  
Research and Development     163  
Properties     163  
Legal Proceedings     163  
PHARMATHENE MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS     165  
Overview     165  
Critical Accounting Policies     165  
Results of Operations     167  
Liquidity and Capital Resources     173  
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements     177  
Contractual Obligations     177  
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT THE MARKET RISK OF PHARMATHENE     178  
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION     179  
PharmAthene’s Retiring Directors and Executive Officers     179  
PharmAthene’s Executive Compensation     181  
Grants of Plan-Based Awards     188  
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End     189  
Option Exercises and Stock Awards Vested     192  

iv


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
Equity Compensation Plan Information     192  
Theraclone’s Executive Compensation     193  
Theraclone’s Director Compensation     195  
PharmAthene’s Director Compensation     196  
General Policy Regarding Compensation of Directors     197  
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE     197  
THERACLONE’S BUSINESS     202  
Overview     202  
Market for Antibodies as Therapeutics     203  
Theraclone’s Strategy     203  
Products Under Development     204  
Intellectual Property     214  
Manufacturing     215  
Government Regulation     216  
Reimbursement     219  
Competition     219  
Employees     220  
Facility     220  
Legal Proceedings     220  
THERACLONE’S MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS     221  
Overview     221  
Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates     222  
Financial Operations Overview     224  
Results of Operations     225  
Liquidity and Capital Resources     228  
Related-Party Transactions     231  
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements     231  
DESCRIPTION OF PHARMATHENE CAPITAL STOCK     232  
Common Stock     232  
Preferred Stock     232  
Anti-Takeover Effects of Provisions of PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws and Delaware Law     233  
COMPARISON OF RIGHTS OF STOCKHOLDERS     234  
LEGAL MATTERS     250  
EXPERTS     250  
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION     250  
OTHER MATTERS     250  
Stockholder Proposals for 2014 Annual Meeting     250  

v


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS     251  
INDEX TO PHARMATHENE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS     F-1  
INDEX TO THERACLONE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS     F-44  
ANNEXES
        
ANNEX A: AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER, AMONG PHARMATHENE, INC., TAURUS MERGER SUB INC., THERACLONE SCIENCES, INC., AND STEVEN GILLIS, PH.D., AS SECURITYHOLDERS’ REPRESENTATIVE, DATED AS OF JULY 31, 2013     A-1  
ANNEX B: FORM OF PHARMATHENE VOTING AND LOCK-UP AGREEMENT     B-1  
ANNEX C: FORM OF THERACLONE VOTING AND LOCK-UP AGREEMENT     C-1  
ANNEX D: FORM OF BOARD COMPOSITION AGREEMENT     D-1  
ANNEX E: FORM OF POST-MERGER LOCK-UP AGREEMENT     E-1  
ANNEX FA: OPINION OF LEERINK SWANN LLC     FA-1  
ANNEX G: SECTION 262 OF THE DELAWARE GENERAL CORPORATE LAW     G-1  
ANNEX H: CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF PHARMATHENE, INC.
    H-1  

vi


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER

The following section provides answers to frequently asked questions about the merger and the effect of the merger on holders of PharmAthene securities and Theraclone securities, the PharmAthene special meeting of stockholders and the Theraclone stockholder action by written consent. This section, however, only provides summary information. PharmAthene and Theraclone urge you to read carefully the remainder of this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation, including the annexes to this proxy statement/prospectus/ consent solicitation, because the information in this section does not provide much of the information that might be important to you regarding the merger and the other matters being considered at the PharmAthene special meeting of stockholders and by the Theraclone stockholder action by written consent.

As used in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation, references to PharmAthene refer to PharmAthene, Inc., a Delaware corporation, references to Theraclone refer to Theraclone Sciences, Inc., a Delaware corporation, references to Merger Sub refer to Taurus Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation, references to the combined company refer collectively to PharmAthene and its subsidiaries following the proposed transaction described in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation, references to the Merger Agreement refer to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of July 31, 2013 by and among PharmAthene, Merger Sub, Theraclone and Steven Gillis, Ph.D., as Securityholders’ Representative, a copy of which is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation, references to merger refer to the merger of merger sub with and into Theraclone, with Theraclone as the surviving, wholly owned subsidiary of PharmAthene as contemplated under the Merger Agreement, and references to the Effective Time refer to the Effective Time of the merger as contemplated under the Merger Agreement.

Questions and Answers Regarding the Merger

Q:  What is the transaction?

A:  PharmAthene, Merger Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of PharmAthene, Theraclone and Steven Gillis, Ph.D., as Securityholders’ Representative have entered into the Merger Agreement that contains the terms and conditions of the proposed business combination of PharmAthene and Theraclone. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, the Merger Sub will merge with and into Theraclone, with Theraclone surviving the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of PharmAthene.

All outstanding shares of Theraclone preferred stock will be converted into shares of Theraclone common stock on a one-for-one basis immediately prior to the Effective Time. At the Effective Time, all outstanding shares of Theraclone common stock will be converted into shares of PharmAthene common stock. Upon completion of the merger, the PharmAthene security holders will own 50% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, and Theraclone security holders will own 50% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, in each case, on an as converted and fully diluted basis but excluding PharmAthene warrants and options with an exercise price of more than $2.50 per share. Based on the number of outstanding securities of each company as of September 3, 2013, (i) if no PharmAthene or Theraclone options or warrants are exercised prior to the completion of the merger, PharmAthene and Theraclone security holders would own, respectively, approximately 54.1% and 45.9% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the combined company and (ii) if PharmAthene warrants and options with an exercise price of more than $2.50 per share are exercised, to the extent such exercises occur, PharmAthene and Theraclone security holders could own, respectively, between approximately 51.5% and 50.0% and 48.5% and 50.0% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, on a fully diluted basis.

Q:  Why am I receiving this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation?

A:  You are receiving this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation because you have been identified as a stockholder of PharmAthene or Theraclone. If you are a stockholder of record of PharmAthene as of the record date, you are entitled to vote at PharmAthene’s special meeting of stockholders. If you are a stockholder of Theraclone as of the record date, you are entitled to vote by executing the Theraclone stockholder action by written consent. This document serves as a proxy statement of PharmAthene, used to solicit proxies for PharmAthene’s special meeting of stockholders, as a consent solicitation of Theraclone, and as a prospectus of PharmAthene to offer shares of PharmAthene common stock to Theraclone security holders in exchange for securities of Theraclone pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement. This document

1


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

contains important information about the merger, the shares of PharmAthene common stock to be issued in the merger, the special meeting of PharmAthene stockholders, and the written consent sought from the Theraclone stockholders and should be read carefully in its entirety.

Q:  What are the expected advantages of the proposed merger of the two companies?

A:  The combined company will have several potential advantages, including:

becoming a leading, biologics company with vaccine and antibody expertise focused on infectious diseases and oncology;
four clinical programs and multiple partnered preclinical programs addressing high-value markets with a significant unmet medical need;
a robust discovery engine with validated fully human monoclonal antibody platform technology providing significant antibody discovery and collaboration opportunities;
as a result of PharmAthene’s successful breach of contract case against SIGA Technologies, Inc., or SIGA, significant revenue potential under a potential damages award from the Delaware Chancery Court related to SIGA’s smallpox antiviral, ArestvyrTM (formerly ST-246®); and
the merger of complementary businesses and research and development and operational capabilities provides the combined company with complementary capabilities to realize synergies and accelerate value to stockholders.

Q:  Who is paying for this proxy solicitation and consent solicitation?

A:  PharmAthene is conducting this proxy solicitation and Theraclone is conducting this consent solicitation and each will bear their own costs of the solicitations, including the preparation, assembly, printing and mailing of this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation, the proxy card and any additional information furnished to PharmAthene and Theraclone stockholders. PharmAthene and Theraclone will each bear its own legal expenses. PharmAthene may also reimburse brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their costs of forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners of its common stock.

Q:  What is required to consummate the merger?

A:  To consummate the merger, PharmAthene stockholders must approve: (i) the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock in the merger; (ii) an increase in the number of shares of common stock that PharmAthene may issue; (iii) the election of nine directors to PharmAthene’s Board of Directors, including four nominees designated by Theraclone; (iv) the amendment of PharmAthene’s Bylaws to limit the ability of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors for a period to expire no later than July 31, 2015 to remove Clifford J. Stocks, the expected Chief Executive Officer of the combined company, and (v) a proposal to adjourn the PharmAthene Special Meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies. In addition, Theraclone stockholders must approve the merger and adopt and approve the Merger Agreement.

The amendment to PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation increasing the authorized number of shares of common stock requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the PharmAthene common stock outstanding and entitled to vote on the proposal. The approval of the proposals to issue shares of PharmAthene common stock in the merger, to amend the Bylaws of PharmAthene to limit the ability of the combined company’s Board of Directors to remove Clifford J. Stocks as the expected Chief Executive Officer of the combined company and to adjourn the meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies, requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the PharmAthene common stock outstanding, entitled to vote on the proposal and present in person or represented by proxy. The election of nine persons to serve on the Board of Directors of PharmAthene requires the affirmative vote of holders of a plurality of PharmAthene common stock outstanding, present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal. For more information, please see the section entitled “MATTERS BEING SUBMITTED TO A VOTE OF PHARMATHENE STOCKHOLDERS.”

2


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The approval by the stockholders of Theraclone requires (i) the holders of at least (a) a majority of the outstanding shares of Theraclone common stock and preferred stock, voting together as a single class on an as-converted-to-common stock basis and (b) a majority of the outstanding shares of the Theraclone preferred stock, voting together as a single class on an as-converted-to-common stock basis each outstanding on the applicable record date, for the merger, the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and (ii) holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of Theraclone preferred stock for the conversion of the shares of Theraclone preferred stock into shares of Theraclone common stock on a one-for-one basis. For more information, please see the section entitled “MATTERS TO BE PRESENTED TO THERACLONE’S STOCKHOLDERS.”

Concurrently and in connection with the execution of the Merger Agreement, PharmAthene’s directors and executive officers, as well as a key employee, who beneficially owned approximately 7.5% of the outstanding shares of PharmAthene common stock as of July 31, 2013, entered into a voting agreement with Theraclone, pursuant to which each such stockholder agreed to vote its shares of PharmAthene common stock in furtherance of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and against any amendment of PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws or any other proposal or transaction, the effect of which amendment or other proposal is to delay, impair, prevent or nullify the merger or the transaction contemplated by the Merger Agreement.

In addition, concurrently with and in connection with execution of the Merger Agreement, certain of Theraclone’s stockholders, who in the aggregate held approximately 75% of the outstanding shares of Theraclone capital stock as of July 31, 2013, entered into a voting agreement with PharmAthene, pursuant to which each stockholder agreed to vote its shares of Theraclone capital stock (i) in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and any actions required in furtherance thereof, (ii) in favor of the conversion of all outstanding shares of Theraclone preferred stock into Theraclone common stock on a one-for-one basis (as of immediately prior to the Effective Time and contingent upon the merger occurring) pursuant to Theraclone’s restated Certificate of Incorporation, (iii) against any other proposal or transaction involving Theraclone, the effect of which amendment or other proposal or transaction would be to delay, impair, prevent or nullify the merger or the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, (iv) against any amendment of Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws that changes in any manner the voting rights of any capital stock of Theraclone (other than the conversion of Theraclone preferred stock into Theraclone common stock), and (v) against any other action or agreement that would result in a breach in any material respect of any covenant, representation or warranty of the Merger Agreement.

In addition to the requirement of obtaining such stockholder approvals and appropriate regulatory approvals, each of the other closing conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement must be satisfied or waived. For a more complete description of the closing conditions under the Merger Agreement, please see the section entitled “THE MERGER AGREEMENT — Conditions to Completion of the Merger.”

Q:  When do PharmAthene and Theraclone expect to complete the merger?

A:  PharmAthene and Theraclone are working to complete the merger during the fourth quarter of 2013, or as soon as reasonably possible. PharmAthene and Theraclone must first obtain the necessary approvals, including the approval of each company’s stockholders, and satisfy the closing conditions described in the Merger Agreement. Neither PharmAthene nor Theraclone can assure you as to whether all the conditions to the merger will be met nor can PharmAthene or Theraclone predict the exact timing of the completion of the merger. It is possible PharmAthene and Theraclone will not complete the merger.

Q:  What are the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger to me?

A:  The merger has been structured to qualify as a tax-free reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, and Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder. As a result of the merger’s qualification as a reorganization, it is anticipated that Theraclone stockholders will not recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes upon the exchange of shares of Theraclone common and preferred stock for shares of PharmAthene common stock, except with respect to cash received in lieu of fractional shares of PharmAthene common stock and except for Theraclone stockholders who exercise their appraisal rights with respect to the merger.

3


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Tax matters are very complicated, and the tax consequences of the merger to a particular stockholder will depend in part on such stockholder’s circumstances. Accordingly, you should consult your tax advisor for a full understanding of the tax consequences of the merger to you, including the applicability and effect of federal, state, local and foreign income and other tax consequences. For more information, please see the section entitled “MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER.”

Q:  Who will be the directors of the combined company following the merger?

A:  Pursuant to a related Board of Directors composition agreement between PharmAthene and certain former stockholders of Theraclone, which is expected to be entered into at completion of the merger and is referred to as the Board Composition Agreement, the nine-member Board of Directors of the combined company will consist of five directors designated by PharmAthene and four directors designated by Theraclone. Those members designated by PharmAthene will initially be Mitchel Sayare, Ph.D., Eric I. Richman, John M. Gill, Brian A. Markison and Derace L. Schaffer, M.D. and those members designated by Theraclone will initially be Steven Gillis, Ph.D., Wende S. Hutton, Clifford J. Stocks and           .

Under the Board Composition Agreement, the executive officers and directors, as well as a key employee, of PharmAthene, the directors of Theraclone and their affiliates, and certain holders of 5% or more of Theraclone’s capital stock will agree to vote all shares owned by such holders, or over which such holders have voting control, as necessary to ensure that the PharmAthene and Theraclone designees are elected to the combined company’s Board of Directors at each annual or special meeting of stockholders of PharmAthene at which directors are elected or through any action taken by written consent of the stockholders of PharmAthene by which directors are elected. These stockholders will also agree to cause the resignation of one of PharmAthene’s designees upon the earlier of (i) the full settlement or final, non-appealable resolution of PharmAthene’s civil action against SIGA, which is referred to as the SIGA Determination Date, and (ii) the second anniversary of the completion of the merger, but not prior to the first anniversary of the completion of the merger. PharmAthene and Theraclone refer to this date as the Designee Resignation Date. The Board Composition Agreement will terminate on the earliest to occur of the fifth anniversary of the date of the Board Composition Agreement and the SIGA Determination Date, but not prior to the first anniversary of completion of the merger. The signing stockholders may sell their shares free of the rights and obligations under the Board Composition Agreement.

Q:  Who will be the executive officers of the combined company following the merger?

A:  Following the merger, Theraclone’s current Chief Executive Officer, Clifford J. Stocks, is expected to serve as the Chief Executive Officer of the combined company, and Theraclone’s current Chief Financial Officer, Russ Hawkinson, is expected to serve as its Chief Financial Officer. Additionally, Theraclone's current Chief Medical Officer, Eleanor Ramos, M.D., and current Chief Scientific Officer, Kristine Swiderek, Ph.D., are expected to serve as the combined company’s Chief Medical Officer and Chief Scientific Officer, respectively. PharmAthene’s Senior Vice President, Policy and Government Affairs, Francesca M. Cook and Senior Vice President and General Counsel, Jordan P. Karp, are expected to remain in their positions at the combined company. Under the Merger Agreement, PharmAthene agreed to amend its Bylaws to provide that Clifford J. Stocks may not be removed from his position as Chief Executive Officer of the combined company without the approval of at least 66 2/3% of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors, until the earliest of (a) July 31, 2015, (b) such time as there is a period longer than 30 days in which less than five PharmAthene Board Designees serve on the combined company’s Board of Directors, and (c) the full settlement or final, non-appealable resolution of PharmAthene’s civil action against SIGA, or the SIGA Resolution; provided, however, that, in the event that the SIGA Resolution occurs prior to the first anniversary of the completion of the Merger, the SIGA Resolution will be deemed to have occurred on the first anniversary of the closing of the merger.

Q:  What risks should I consider in deciding whether to vote in favor of the proposals?

A:  You should carefully review the section of this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation entitled “RISK FACTORS,” which sets forth certain risks and uncertainties related to the merger, risks and uncertainties to which the combined company’s business will be subject, and risks and uncertainties to which each of PharmAthene and Theraclone, as an independent company, is subject.

4


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Q: Who can help answer my questions?

A:  If you are a PharmAthene stockholder and would like additional copies, without charge, of this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation or if you have questions about the merger, including the procedures for voting your shares, please direct your request to: PharmAthene, Inc., One Park Place, Annapolis, MD 21401, c/o Corporate Secretary, or call PharmAthene at: (410) 269-2600.

If you are a Theraclone stockholder and would like additional copies, without charge, of this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation or if you have questions about the merger, including the procedures for signing the stockholder action by written consent, you should contact: Theraclone Sciences, Inc., Seattle Life Sciences Building, 1124 Columbia Street, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98104, c/o Chief Financial Officer, or call Theraclone at (206) 805-1600.

You may also obtain additional information about PharmAthene from documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by following the instructions in the section entitled “WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.”

Questions and Answers for PharmAthene Stockholders

Q:  What do PharmAthene stockholders need to do now?

A:  You should read this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation carefully, including its annexes, and consider how the merger affects you and then vote your shares either in person at the PharmAthene special meeting or by proxy.

If you are a PharmAthene stockholder on the record date, you may provide your proxy instructions in one of three different ways. First, you can mail your signed proxy card in the enclosed return envelope. Alternatively, if you are a registered stockholder of PharmAthene, you can provide your proxy instructions via the toll-free call center set up for this purpose by calling the toll-free number on your proxy card and following the instructions. Please have your proxy card available when you call. You will be prompted to enter the control number from your proxy card that will identify you as a stockholder of record. If you vote by telephone, you do not need to return your proxy card. Finally, if you are a registered stockholder of PharmAthene, you can provide your proxy instructions via the Internet at the web address shown on your proxy card by following the on-screen instructions. Please have your proxy card available when you access the web page. You will be prompted to enter the control number from your proxy card that will identify you as a stockholder of record. If you vote over the Internet, you do not need to return your proxy card. Please provide your proxy instructions only once and as soon as possible so that your shares can be voted at the PharmAthene special meeting. PharmAthene stockholders may also attend the PharmAthene special meeting in person. PharmAthene urges you to vote by proxy to ensure your vote is counted. You may still attend the PharmAthene special meeting and vote in person even if you have already voted by proxy.

Q:  As a PharmAthene stockholder, how does PharmAthene’s Board of Directors recommend that I vote?

A:  After careful consideration, PharmAthene’s Board of Directors unanimously recommends that PharmAthene stockholders vote:

FOR” PharmAthene Proposal No. 1 to approve the issuance of PharmAthene common stock, in the merger as contemplated by the Merger Agreement, a copy of which is attached as Annex A to the proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation,
FOR” PharmAthene Proposal No. 2 to approve an amendment to PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of common stock that PharmAthene may issue;
FOR” each of the director nominees in PharmAthene Proposal No. 3 to serve as directors until PharmAthene’s next annual meeting of stockholders or until their respective successors are elected and qualified;
FOR” PharmAthene Proposal No. 4 to approve an amendment to PharmAthene’s Bylaws to require, for a period to expire no later than July 31, 2015, the approval of at least 66 2/3% of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors to remove Clifford J. Stocks, the expected Chief Executive Officer of the combined company; and

5


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOR” PharmAthene Proposal No. 5 to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of any of the proposals.

Q:  What happens if I do not return a PharmAthene proxy card or otherwise provide proxy instructions?

A:  If you are a PharmAthene stockholder, the failure to return your proxy card or otherwise provide proxy instructions will have the same effect as voting against Proposal No. 2. An abstention has the same effect as a vote against the proposal. The approval of each of Proposal Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 is required to complete the merger.

Q:  May I vote in person?

A:  If your shares of PharmAthene common stock are registered directly in your name with PharmAthene’s transfer agent, you are considered, with respect to those shares, the stockholder of record, and the proxy materials and proxy card are being sent directly to you. If you are a PharmAthene stockholder of record as of            , 2013, you may attend the PharmAthene special meeting to be held on            , 2013 and vote your shares in person, rather than signing and returning your proxy card or otherwise providing proxy instructions. However, PharmAthene urges you to return your proxy voting instructions in any event, just in case your plans should change.

If your shares of PharmAthene common stock are held in a brokerage account or by another nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and the proxy materials are being forwarded to you together with a voting instruction card. As the beneficial owner, you are also invited to attend the PharmAthene special meeting. Since a beneficial owner is not the stockholder of record, however, you may not vote these shares in person at the special meeting unless you obtain a “legal proxy” from the broker, trustee or nominee that holds your shares, giving you the right to vote the shares at the meeting.

Q:  If my shares are held in “street name” by my broker, will my broker vote my PharmAthene shares for me?

A:  Unless your broker has discretionary authority to vote on the matters, your broker will not be able to vote your shares of PharmAthene common stock without instruction forms from you. Brokers are not expected to have discretionary authority to vote for any of the PharmAthene Proposals. If you do not provide instructions forms with respect to these proposals, your broker, must deliver a proxy card to PharmAthene expressly indicating that it is not voting your shares, which is referred to as a “broker non-vote.” Broker non-votes will not count for purposes of determining the number of votes cast. To make sure your vote is counted, you should instruct your broker as to how to vote your shares, following the instructions contained in the voting instructions card that your broker provides to you.

Q:  May I change my vote after I have provided proxy instructions?

A:  Yes, except for those stockholders who have executed a voting agreement and irrevocable proxy. If you have not voted through your broker, there are three ways for you to revoke your proxy and change your vote. First, you may send a written notice to PharmAthene’s Corporate Secretary stating that you would like to revoke your proxy. Second, you may complete and submit a new proxy card, but it must bear a later date than the original proxy. Third, you may attend and vote in person at the special meeting of PharmAthene stockholders. Your attendance alone will not revoke your proxy. If you have instructed a broker to vote your shares, you must follow the directions you receive from your broker to change your vote. Your last vote will be the vote that is counted. If you have executed a voting agreement and irrevocable proxy, you may not revoke your proxy instructions.

Q:  Are PharmAthene stockholders entitled to appraisal rights?

A:  PharmAthene stockholders do not have any appraisal rights in connection with the merger.

Questions and Answers for Theraclone Stockholders

Q:  What do Theraclone stockholders need to do now?

A:  You should read this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation carefully, including its annexes, and consider how the merger affects you. Theraclone stockholders are being asked to sign and return the

6


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

written consent. Theraclone is not asking Theraclone stockholders for a proxy and Theraclone stockholders are not requested to send Theraclone a proxy. If you hold shares of Theraclone common stock or preferred stock as of the record date and you wish to give your written consent, you must complete the enclosed written consent, date and sign it, and promptly return it to Theraclone. Once you have completed, dated and signed the written consent, you may deliver it to Theraclone by faxing it to Theraclone’s legal counsel, Fenwick & West LLP, Attention: Ellen Welichko, at (206) 389-4511, by emailing a .pdf copy of your written consent to ewelichko@fenwick.com, or by mailing your written consent to Fenwick & West LLP at 1191 Second Avenue, 10th Floor, Seattle, Washington 98101, Attention: Ellen Welichko.

Q:  What am I being asked to approve?

A:  You are being asked to approve (i) the merger and adopt and approve the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and (ii) the conversion of the shares of Theraclone preferred stock into shares of Theraclone common stock on a one-for-one basis.

Q:  What options do I have with respect to the Theraclone proposal?

A:  With respect to the shares of Theraclone common stock or preferred stock that you hold, you may execute a written consent to approve the merger and the terms of the Merger Agreement proposal (which is equivalent to a vote for the proposal) or to disapprove such proposal (which is equivalent to a vote against the proposal). If you fail to execute and return your written consent, it has the same effect as voting against the proposal.

Q:  As a Theraclone stockholder, how does Theraclone’s Board of Directors recommend that I vote?

A:  After careful consideration, Theraclone’s Board of Directors unanimously recommends that Theraclone’s stockholders vote to approve the merger and adopt and approve the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and to approve the conversion of the shares of Theraclone preferred stock into shares of Theraclone common stock on a one-for-one basis.

Q:  Who is entitled to give a written consent?

A:  Theraclone’s Board of Directors has set            , 2013 as the record date for determining holders of Theraclone common stock or preferred stock entitled to execute and deliver written consent with respect to this solicitation. Holders of Theraclone common stock or preferred stock on the record date will be entitled to give a consent using the written consent furnished with this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation. If you are a Theraclone stockholder on the record date, you will be able to give or withhold consent, or abstain, on each proposal on which you are entitled to vote, using the written consent furnished with this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation.

Q:  Who is soliciting my written consent?

A:  Theraclone’s Board of Directors is providing these consent solicitation materials to you. These materials constitute a prospectus with respect to the PharmAthene common stock issuable to Theraclone’s stockholders in the merger.

Q:  How can I return my Theraclone written consent?

A:  If you hold shares of Theraclone common stock or preferred stock as of the record date and you wish to submit your consent, you must fill out the enclosed written consent, date and sign it, and promptly return it to Theraclone. Once you have completed, dated and signed your written consent, deliver it to Theraclone by faxing it to Theraclone’s legal counsel, Fenwick & West LLP, Attention: Ellen Welichko, at (206) 389-4511, by emailing a .pdf copy of your written consent to ewelichko@fenwick.com, or by mailing your written consent to Fenwick & West LLP at 1191 Second Avenue, 10th Floor, Seattle, Washington 98101, Attention: Ellen Welichko.

Theraclone will not be holding a stockholders’ meeting to consider these proposals, and therefore you will be unable to vote by attending a stockholders’ meeting.

Q:  What happens if I do not return my Theraclone written consent?

A:  If you are a record holder of shares of Theraclone common stock or preferred stock and you do not return your written consent, that will have the same effect as a vote against the proposals.

7


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Q:  Will my rights as a PharmAthene stockholder be different from my rights as a Theraclone stockholder?

A:  Yes. Upon completion of the merger, each stockholder of Theraclone, will become a stockholder of PharmAthene. There are important differences between the rights of stockholders of PharmAthene and stockholders of Theraclone. Please carefully review the description of these differences in the section of this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation entitled “COMPARISON OF RIGHTS OF STOCKHOLDERS.”

Q:  Should I send in my stock certificates now?

A:  No. If you are a Theraclone stockholder, after the merger is consummated, you will receive written instructions from the exchange agent for exchanging your certificates representing shares of Theraclone capital stock for certificates representing shares of PharmAthene common stock.

Q:  Are Theraclone stockholders entitled to appraisal rights?

A:  Under Delaware law, holders of Theraclone common stock or preferred stock are entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the merger. If you do not wish to accept shares of PharmAthene common stock in the merger and you do not approve the merger in the Theraclone stockholder action by written consent, you have the right under Delaware law to seek from Theraclone the “fair value” of your shares in lieu of the PharmAthene common stock you would receive if the merger is completed. Theraclone refers you to the information under the heading “THE MERGER — Appraisal Rights” and to the applicable Delaware statute attached as Annex G to this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation for information on how to exercise your appraisal rights. Failure to follow all of the steps required under the Delaware law will result in the loss of your appraisal rights.

Q:  What will Theraclone stockholders receive in the merger?

A:  PharmAthene has agreed to issue, and Theraclone stockholders will have the right to receive, for each share of Theraclone common stock they hold, that number of shares of PharmAthene common stock, as determined pursuant to the Exchange Ratio described in the Merger Agreement and in the section entitled “THE MERGER AGREEMENT — Merger Consideration.” If the merger is consummated, each share of Theraclone common stock and Theraclone preferred stock will convert into the right to receive that number of shares of PharmAthene common stock equal to the Exchange Ratio. The Exchange Ratio is a formula set forth in the Merger Agreement and described in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation under the heading “THE MERGER AGREEMENT — Merger Consolidation.” Based on PharmAthene’s and Theraclone’s outstanding securities as of September 3, 2013, the Exchange Ratio would have been 1.116. Upon completion of the merger, the PharmAthene security holders will own 50% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, and Theraclone security holders will own 50% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, in each case, on an as converted and fully diluted basis but excluding PharmAthene warrants and options with an exercise price of more than $2.50 per share. Based on the number of outstanding securities of each company as of September 3, 2013, (i) if no PharmAthene or Theraclone options or warrants are exercised prior to the completion of the merger, PharmAthene and Theraclone security holders would own, respectively, approximately 54.1% and 45.9% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the combined company and (ii) if PharmAthene warrants and options with an exercise price of more than $2.50 per share are exercised, to the extent such exercises occur, PharmAthene and Theraclone security holders could own, respectively, between approximately 51.5% and 50.0% and 48.5% and 50.0% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, on a fully diluted basis.

Q:  Is any portion of the merger consideration being set aside as an escrow?

A:  Yes. Upon the completion of the merger, five percent of the merger consideration issuable to the stockholders of Theraclone will be held in escrow as security for indemnification claims under the Merger Agreement. The shares of PharmAthene common stock will be held in the escrow fund until the date that is nine months from the date of completion of the merger, subject to any unresolved indemnification claims.

Q:  How will the merger affect stock options and warrants for Theraclone capital stock?

A:  PharmAthene will assume options and warrants to purchase shares of Theraclone common stock and Theraclone preferred stock, which will become exercisable for shares of PharmAthene common stock with the

8


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

same terms, exercisability, vesting schedule and other provisions, but with the number of shares and exercise price being appropriately adjusted to reflect the Exchange Ratio between PharmAthene common stock and Theraclone common stock and preferred stock determined in accordance with the Merger Agreement and described above.

Q:  What if I am a record holder and I don’t indicate a decision with respect to the proposals?

A:  If you are a record holder on the record date of shares of Theraclone common stock or Theraclone preferred stock and you return a signed written consent without indicating your decision on a proposal, you will have given your consent to approve (i) the merger and adopt and approve the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and (ii) the conversion of the shares of Theraclone preferred stock into shares of Theraclone common stock on a one-for-one basis.

Q:  What is the deadline for returning my written consent?

A:  The Theraclone Board of Directors has set          , 2013 as the targeted final date for receipt of written consents. Theraclone reserves the right to extend the final date for receipt of written consents beyond          , 2013 in the event that consents approving the merger and adopting and approving the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby have not been obtained by that date from holders of a sufficient number of shares of Theraclone common stock and Theraclone preferred stock to satisfy the conditions to the merger. Any such extension may be made without notice to stockholders. Once all conditions to the merger have been satisfied or waived, the consent solicitation will conclude.

Q:  Can I change or revoke my written consent?

A:  Yes, if you are a record holder on the record date of shares of Theraclone common stock or preferred stock, you may change or revoke your consent to a proposal at any time before the consents of a sufficient number of shares to approve and adopt such proposal have been filed with the corporate secretary of Theraclone. If you wish to change or revoke your consent before that time, you may do so by sending in a new written consent with a later date or delivering a notice of revocation to the corporate secretary of Theraclone.

9


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUMMARY

The Companies

PharmAthene, Inc.

PharmAthene is a leading biodefense company engaged in the development and commercialization of next generation medical countermeasures against biological and chemical threats. PharmAthene’s current biodefense portfolio includes the following product candidates:

SparVaxTM, a next generation recombinant protective antigen, or rPA, anthrax vaccine;
rBChE (recombinant butyrylcholinesterase) bioscavenger, a medical countermeasure for nerve agent poisoning by organophosphorous compounds, including nerve gases and pesticides; and
Valortim®, a fully human monoclonal antibody for the prevention and treatment of anthrax infection.

In addition, in May 2013, the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed a September 2011 ruling of the Delaware Court of Chancery that SIGA had breached certain contractual obligations to PharmAthene. The matter is on remand to the Delaware Court of Chancery to determine a remedy in light of the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision. Previously the Delaware Court of Chancery had awarded PharmAthene the right to receive 50% of all net profits (as defined in the court’s final judgment) related to the sale of SIGA’s ArestvyrTM (formerly known as ST-246®) and related products for 10 years following initial commercial sale of the drug once SIGA earns $40.0 million in net profits from the sales of ArestvyrTM and related products and a portion of PharmAthene’s attorney’s fees and expert witness and other costs. There can be no assurance that the Delaware Court of Chancery will re-instate its prior remedy or order another remedy for PharmAthene, that SIGA will not appeal any subsequent decision by the Delaware Court of Chancery, or that SIGA will not be successful in any subsequent appeal.

PharmAthene’s goal is to become one of the leading companies specializing in the development and commercialization of best-in-class prophylactic and therapeutic drugs for defense against biological and chemical threats and emerging infectious diseases worldwide.

PharmAthene is headquartered in Annapolis, Maryland and was incorporated in Delaware in April 2005. PharmAthene’s principal offices are located at One Park Place, Suite 450, Annapolis, Maryland 21401 and its telephone number is (410) 269-2600. PharmAthene’s principal website is www.pharmathene.com. The information contained on or connected to PharmAthene’s website is expressly not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation. For additional information about PharmAthene, see the sections entitled “PharmAthene’s Business” and “PHARMATHENE’S MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS” and PharmAthene’s financial statements included elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation.

Theraclone Sciences, Inc.

Theraclone is a biopharmaceutical company focused on the discovery and development of novel, monoclonal antibody therapeutics for diseases that are devastating for patients and their families and which are a significant threat to human health. Theraclone leverages its proprietary antibody discovery technology, I-STAR (In-Situ Therapeutic Antibody Rescue), to identify rare human antibodies that may be developed into antibody product candidates that are potentially safer and more effective than current therapies. Theraclone has a portfolio of innovative antibodies in clinical and preclinical development targeting serious medical conditions with a significant unmet medical need and a primary focus on infectious disease and cancer, which include:

TCN-032, a recombinant fully human monoclonal antibody for the treatment of patients hospitalized with serious influenza; and
TCN-202, a recombinant fully human monoclonal antibody for the treatment and prevention of cytomegalovirus, or CMV infections.

Theraclone is also working to identify additional fully human antibodies to expand its discovery pipeline of potential product candidates targeting infectious disease and oncology indications.

10


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone’s strategy is to advance clinical development of its lead product candidates, TCN-032 and TCN-202; utilize the I-STAR technology and its antibody discovery capabilities to identify new product candidates; form strategic alliances to help fund research and development operations and accelerate the development of its product candidates; and pursue funding through partnerships with the U.S. government.

Theraclone is headquartered in Seattle, Washington and was incorporated in Delaware in March 2004. Theraclone’s principal offices are located at Seattle Life Sciences Building, 1124 Columbia Street, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98104, and its telephone number is (206) 805-1600. Theraclone’s principal website is www.theraclone-sciences.com. The information contained on or connected to Theraclone’s website is expressly not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation. For additional information about Theraclone, see the sections entitled “THERACLONE’S BUSINESS” and “THERACLONE’S MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS” and Theraclone’s financial statements included elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation.

Taurus Merger Sub, Inc.

Taurus Merger Sub, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of PharmAthene that was incorporated in Delaware on July 31, 2013. Merger Sub does not engage in operations and exists solely to facilitate the merger. If the merger is completed, Merger Sub will cease to exist following its merger with and into Theraclone.

Merger Sub’s principal offices are located at One Park Place, Suite 450, Annapolis, Maryland 21401 and its telephone number is (410) 269-2600.

The Merger

If the merger is completed, Merger Sub will merge with and into Theraclone, with Theraclone surviving the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of PharmAthene. After the merger, PharmAthene and its wholly owned subsidiary, Theraclone, will operate as a combined company.

All outstanding shares of Theraclone preferred stock will be converted into shares of Theraclone common stock on a one-for-one basis immediately prior to the Effective Time, subject to the approval of such conversion by Theraclone’s preferred stockholders. At the Effective Time, all outstanding shares of Theraclone common stock will be converted into shares of PharmAthene common stock. Upon completion of the merger, the PharmAthene security holders will own 50% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, and Theraclone security holders will own 50% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, in each case, on an as converted and fully diluted basis but excluding PharmAthene warrants and options with an exercise price of more than $2.50 per share. Based on the number of outstanding securities of each company as of September 3, 2013, (i) if no PharmAthene or Theraclone options or warrants are exercised prior to the completion of the merger, PharmAthene and Theraclone security holders would own, respectively, approximately 54.1% and 45.9% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the combined company and (ii) if PharmAthene warrants and options with an exercise price of more than $2.50 per share are exercised, to the extent such exercises occur, PharmAthene and Theraclone security holders could own, respectively, between approximately 51.5% and 50.0% and 48.5% and 50.0% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, on a fully diluted basis.

A copy of the Merger Agreement is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation and is incorporated by reference herein. You are encouraged to read the Merger Agreement in its entirety because it is the legal document that governs the merger. For a more complete discussion of the merger, see the sections entitled “THE MERGER” and “THE MERGER AGREEMENT.”

Reasons for the Merger

The combined company will be a fully integrated, commercially-focused biologics company. PharmAthene and Theraclone both believe that the combination of the two companies will be able to create more value than either company could achieve individually.

11


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Each of the boards of directors of PharmAthene and Theraclone also considered other reasons for the merger, as described herein. For example, the PharmAthene Board of Directors considered, among other reasons:

historical and current information concerning PharmAthene’s business, financial performance, financial condition, operations, management, and competitive position, the prospects of PharmAthene and its products, the nature of the biodefense industry generally, including financial projections of PharmAthene under various scenarios, and its short- and long-term strategic objectives and the related risks and the belief that the combination of PharmAthene’s and Theraclone’s businesses would create more value for PharmAthene stockholders in the long-term than PharmAthene could create as an independent, stand-alone company;
the viability of strategic alternatives, if the proposed merger with Theraclone does not occur, including among other things PharmAthene’s financial prospects, the likelihood of other business combinations or other strategic transactions and access to the capital needed to continue successful operations, and the belief that the proposed merger with Theraclone would provide PharmAthene’s stockholders with a greater potential opportunity to realize a return on their investment than any other alternative reasonably available to PharmAthene and its stockholders;
historical and current information concerning Theraclone’s business, financial performance, financial condition, operations and management and the results of a due diligence investigation of Theraclone conducted by PharmAthene’s management and advisors; and
the opportunity for PharmAthene’s stockholders to participate in the potential future value of the combined company, including future potential value from Theraclone’s technology and other assets.

In addition, the Theraclone Board of Directors considered, among other reasons, the following:

the belief that the merger with PharmAthene would be a more time- and cost-effective means to access sufficient capital than other options considered, including an initial public offering or additional rounds of private equity financing;
the belief that the range of options available to the combined company to access private and public equity markets will likely be greater as a public company than continuing as a privately held company;
the belief that the combined company’s diversified pipeline of product candidates, research capabilities, government contracting expertise, access to opportunities for non-dilutive funding and other synergies creates a superior company when compared to remaining as an independent private company; and
the strategic alternatives of Theraclone to the merger, including, remaining an independent private company, attempting an initial public offering, entering into a business combination transaction with an alternative company and additional strategic partnerships.

For a more complete discussion of PharmAthene’s and Theraclone’s reasons for the merger, see the sections entitled “THE MERGER — PharmAthene Reasons for the Merger” and “THE MERGER — Theraclone Reasons for the Merger.”

Risks Related to the Merger

Both PharmAthene and Theraclone are subject to various risks associated with their respective businesses and financial condition. In addition, the merger, as well as the possibility that the merger may not be completed, pose a number of risks to PharmAthene and Theraclone and their respective stockholders, including the following risks:

the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock to the Theraclone stockholders in the merger will dilute substantially the voting power of current PharmAthene stockholders;
there is no assurance when or even if the merger will be completed. Failure to obtain required approvals necessary to satisfy closing conditions may delay or prevent completion of the merger;

12


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

because the lack of a public market for Theraclone’s outstanding shares makes it difficult to evaluate the fairness of the merger, Theraclone stockholders may receive consideration in the merger that is greater than or less than the fair market value of the Theraclone shares;
because the merger will be completed after the date of the PharmAthene special meeting of stockholders and the Theraclone written consent of stockholders, at the time of the special meeting or written consent, you will not know the exact number of shares of PharmAthene common stock that the Theraclone stockholders will receive upon completion of the merger;
PharmAthene and Theraclone executive officers and directors may have interests in the merger that are different from, or in addition to, those of PharmAthene stockholders and Theraclone stockholders generally;
the announcement and pendency of the merger could have an adverse effect on the trading price of PharmAthene common stock and the business, financial condition, results of operations or business prospects for PharmAthene, Theraclone and the combined company;
during the pendency of the merger, PharmAthene and Theraclone may be unable to enter into a business combination with another party because of restrictions in the Merger Agreement;
the merger may be completed even though material adverse changes may result from the announcement of the merger, industry-wide changes or other causes;
the rights of Theraclone stockholders who become PharmAthene stockholders in the merger will be governed by PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws;
if the merger does not qualify as a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code or is otherwise taxable to U.S. holders of Theraclone common stock, then such holders may be required to pay substantial U.S. Federal income taxes;
PharmAthene and Theraclone have incurred and will continue to incur significant transaction costs in connection with the merger; and
the anticipated benefits of the merger may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer to realize than expected.

In addition, PharmAthene, Theraclone and the combined company are subject to various risks associated with their respective businesses. These risks are discussed in greater detail in the section entitled “RISK FACTORS.” PharmAthene and Theraclone both encourage you to read and consider all of these risks carefully.

Opinion of PharmAthene’s Financial Advisor

In connection with the merger, the PharmAthene Board of Directors received a written opinion, dated July 31, 2013, of PharmAthene’s financial advisor, Leerink Swann LLC, also referred to as PharmAthene’s financial advisor or Leerink, as to the fairness, from a financial point of view and as of the date of the opinion, to PharmAthene of the Exchange Ratio used in the merger. The full text of Leerink’s written opinion, dated July 31, 2013, which describes the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken, is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation as Annex F. Leerink provided its opinion for the benefit and use of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors in its consideration of the transaction, and its opinion is directed only to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of PharmAthene common stock (other than Theraclone and its affiliates) of the Exchange Ratio, as of the date of the opinion. The Leerink opinion does not constitute an opinion as to the merits of the merger or the prices at which shares of PharmAthene common stock will trade at any time, and is not a recommendation to any holder of PharmAthene common stock as to how such holder should vote with respect to the merger, or any other matter. For a more complete discussion of Leerink’s opinion, see the section entitled “THE MERGER — Opinion of Leerink Swann.”

Overview of the Merger Agreement

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub, will merge with and into Theraclone, with Theraclone as the surviving wholly owned subsidiary of the combined company.

13


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, at the Effective Time, each outstanding share of capital stock of Theraclone will be converted into the right to receive a number of shares of PharmAthene common stock equal to the quotient obtained by dividing the fully diluted equity (as defined below) of PharmAthene by the fully diluted equity of Theraclone, or the Exchange Ratio, less a pro rata share of PharmAthene common stock representing five percent of the merger consideration issuable to the stockholders of Theraclone, or the Escrow Shares. The Merger Agreement defines “fully diluted equity” to mean, with respect to PharmAthene, the total number of shares outstanding of PharmAthene common stock assuming full conversion or exercise of all then outstanding options and warrants, which, in each case, have an exercise price less than or equal to $2.50 per share, and convertible securities. With respect to Theraclone, “fully diluted equity” means the total number of shares outstanding of Theraclone common stock, assuming full conversion or exercise of all then-outstanding options and warrants and all convertible securities. Based on PharmAthene’s and Theraclone’s outstanding securities as of September 3, 2013, the Exchange Ratio would have been 1.116. Holders of Theraclone common stock will receive cash in lieu of fractional shares. In addition, all outstanding Theraclone options, as well as Theraclone’s 2004 Option Plan, will be assumed by PharmAthene. Each option or warrant to purchase one share of Theraclone common stock or preferred stock will be converted into an option or warrant, as the case may be, to purchase a number of shares of PharmAthene common stock representing the number of Theraclone shares of common stock or preferred stock for which the exchanged option or warrant was exercisable multiplied by the Exchange Ratio. The exercise price would be proportionately adjusted.

Upon completion of the merger, the PharmAthene security holders will own 50% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, and Theraclone security holders will own 50% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, in each case, on an as converted and fully diluted basis but excluding PharmAthene warrants and options with an exercise price of more than $2.50 per share. Based on the number of outstanding securities of each company as of September 3, 2013, (i) if no PharmAthene or Theraclone options or warrants are exercised prior to the completion of the merger, PharmAthene and Theraclone security holders would own, respectively, approximately 54.1% and 45.9% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the combined company and (ii) if PharmAthene warrants and options with an exercise price of more than $2.50 per share are exercised, to the extent such exercises occur, PharmAthene and Theraclone security holders could own, respectively, between approximately 51.5% and 50.0% and 48.5% and 50.0% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, on a fully diluted basis. The Escrow Shares described above, which will serve to secure the Theraclone stockholders’ indemnification obligations under the Merger Agreement, will be deposited with Citibank, N.A., as escrow agent under a separate escrow agreement to be entered into prior to the completion of the merger. The escrow period will expire nine months from the date of completion of the merger.

Completion of the merger is subject to a number of conditions, including, but not limited to (i) approval of the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock in connection with the merger, and approval of an increase in the authorized number of shares of common stock by PharmAthene’s stockholders and the adoption and approval of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby by Theraclone’s stockholders; (ii) the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this proxy statement/prospectus/ consent solicitation forms a part; (iii) approval for listing on the NYSE MKT LLC, or NYSE MKT, of the shares of PharmAthene common stock to be issued in connection with the merger; (iv) execution of the Board Composition Agreement; (v) exercise of appraisal rights by no more than 5% of PharmAthene’s stockholders (PharmAthene stockholders do not have appraisal rights in this merger); (vi) the amendment of PharmAthene’s Bylaws to require, for a period to expire no later than July 31, 2015, the approval of at least 66 2/3% of the Board of Directors of the combined company to remove Clifford J. Stocks, the expected Chief Executive Officer of the combined company; (vii) the delivery to Theraclone of all $8,000,000 of capital committed to Theraclone pursuant to its Series B-1 Preferred Stock and Warrant Purchase and Exchange Agreement and (viii) other customary closing conditions.

Each of PharmAthene and Theraclone have made customary representations, warranties and covenants in the Merger Agreement, including among others, covenants that (i) each party will conduct its business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice during the interim period between execution of the Merger Agreement and completion of the merger; (ii) each party will not engage in certain kinds of transactions or take certain actions during such period (including, but not limited to, the issuance and sale of its securities and

14


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the incurrence of debt, with certain exceptions); (iii) Theraclone will solicit approval by its stockholders of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and the Board of Directors of Theraclone will recommend that its stockholders adopt and approve the Merger Agreement, subject to certain exceptions; and (iv) PharmAthene will convene and hold a meeting of its stockholders for the purpose of considering the approval of the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock in connection with the merger, the election of the PharmAthene and Theraclone Board Designees, the authorization of additional shares of common stock, and the amendment to PharmAthene’s Bylaws to require, for a period to expire no later than July 31, 2015, the approval of at least 66 2/3% of the Board of Directors of the combined company to remove Clifford J. Stocks, the expected Chief Executive Officer of the combined company, the Board of Directors of PharmAthene will recommend that its stockholders adopt and approve such proposals, subject to certain exceptions. PharmAthene also has agreed not to solicit proposals relating to alternative business combination transactions or enter into discussions or an agreement concerning any proposals for alternative business combination transactions, subject to exceptions in the event of its receipt of a “superior proposal,” as defined in the Merger Agreement. All representations and warranties of Theraclone (but not PharmAthene) included in the Merger Agreement will survive the completion of the merger and remain in full force and effect until nine months after the closing date.

The Merger Agreement contains termination rights in favor of each of PharmAthene and Theraclone in certain circumstances. If PharmAthene terminates the Merger Agreement pursuant to its superior proposal termination right, it is obligated to pay to Theraclone a break-up fee of $3,500,000. If the PharmAthene Board of Directors changes its voting recommendations to PharmAthene stockholders as a result of a Transaction Event (as defined below) and Theraclone terminates as a result of such change in recommendation, or if PharmAthene terminated the Merger Agreement as a result of a Transaction Event, then PharmAthene is obligated to pay Theraclone a break-up fee of $4,500,000. A Transaction Event is defined to occur if the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware renders a substantive decision on the merits in PharmAthene’s civil case against SIGA and within 20 business days thereafter the PharmAthene Board of Directors determines, in its reasonable discretion, that, as a result of such decision, it can no longer consider the merger a merger of equals. In addition, either party may terminate the Merger Agreement if (i) the merger has not been completed by January 31, 2014, or the Outside Termination Date, provided that, if the registration statement of which this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation forms a part is not declared effective by October 4, 2013, then either party is generally entitled to extend the Outside Termination Date by 60 days, or (ii) the PharmAthene stockholders fail to approve the issuance of shares in the merger, the increase in authorized shares of common stock or the election of the PharmAthene or Theraclone board designees. If (a) the Merger Agreement is terminated because the merger has not been completed prior to the Outside Termination Date or the PharmAthene special meeting (including any postponements or adjournments thereof) shall have concluded and the PharmAthene stockholders fail to approve the issuance of shares in the merger, the increase in authorized shares of common stock or the election of the PharmAthene or Theraclone board designees, (b) a takeover approval was announced prior to the PharmAthene stockholder meeting with respect to the merger and (c) within nine months after the date of the termination of the Merger Agreement, PharmAthene enters into an agreement or understanding with respect to any takeover proposal that is subsequently completed, then PharmAthene is obligated to pay to Theraclone a break-up fee of $3,500,000. In certain other circumstances, PharmAthene will be obligated to reimburse Theraclone for expenses incurred in connection with the merger, not to exceed $1,000,000.

The Merger Agreement contains certain indemnification provisions, which, among other things, provide that Theraclone stockholders are not obligated, absent fraud or willful misconduct, to indemnify PharmAthene or its affiliates unless and until the aggregate amount of indemnification claims brought against them by PharmAthene and its affiliates is at least $1,000,000, and if triggered the indemnity covers amounts in excess of the $1,000,000 threshold. In addition, no Theraclone stockholder has an obligation, absent fraud or willful misconduct of Theraclone, to indemnify PharmAthene or its affiliates for an amount in excess of such Theraclone stockholder’s pro rata share of the Escrow Shares. The Merger Agreement appointed Steven Gillis, Ph.D. as the agent for and on behalf of the Theraclone stockholders with respect to the Merger Agreement and escrow agreement, as well as related matters.

15


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PharmAthene Voting Agreement

Concurrently and in connection with the execution of the Merger Agreement, certain of PharmAthene’s stockholders, who beneficially own approximately 7.5% of the outstanding shares of PharmAthene common stock as of July 31, 2013, entered into a voting agreement with Theraclone, or the PharmAthene Voting Agreement, pursuant to which each stockholder agreed to vote its shares of PharmAthene common stock in furtherance of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and against any amendment of PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws or any other proposal or transaction, the effect of which amendment or other proposal is to delay, impair, prevent or nullify the merger or the transaction contemplated by the Merger Agreement.

The PharmAthene Voting Agreement will terminate upon, among other things, the earlier of the Effective Time or termination of the Merger Agreement. For a more complete discussion of the PharmAthene Voting Agreement, see the section entitled “VOTING AND OTHER AGREEMENTS — Voting and Lock-Up Agreements.” A copy of the PharmAthene Voting Agreement is attached as Annex B to this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation.

Theraclone Voting Agreement

Concurrently and in connection with the execution of the Merger Agreement, certain of Theraclone’s stockholders, who in the aggregate held approximately 75% of the outstanding shares of Theraclone capital stock as of July 31, 2013, entered into a voting agreement with PharmAthene, or the Theraclone Voting Agreement, pursuant to which each stockholder agreed to vote its shares of Theraclone capital stock (i) in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and any actions required in furtherance thereof, (ii) in favor of the conversion of all outstanding shares of Theraclone preferred stock into Theraclone common stock on a one-for-one basis (as of immediately prior to the Effective Time and contingent upon the merger occurring) pursuant to Theraclone’s restated Certificate of Incorporation, (iii) against any other proposal or transaction involving Theraclone, the effect of which amendment or other proposal or transaction would be to delay, impair, prevent or nullify the merger or the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, (iv) against any amendment of Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws that changes in any manner the voting rights of any capital stock of Theraclone (other than the conversion of Theraclone preferred stock into Theraclone common stock), and (v) against any other action or agreement that would result in a breach in any material respect of any covenant, representation or warranty of the merger Agreement.

The Theraclone Voting Agreement will terminate upon, among other things, the earlier of the Effective Time or termination of the Merger Agreement. For a more complete discussion of the Theraclone Voting Agreement, see the section entitled “VOTING AND OTHER AGREEMENTS — Voting and Lock-Up Agreements.” A copy of the Theraclone Voting Agreement is attached as Annex C to this proxy statement/ prospectus/consent solicitation.

Stockholder Approval of the Merger

As of September 3, 2013, all directors and executive officers of PharmAthene, together with their affiliates, beneficially owned approximately 7.32% of the shares of PharmAthene common stock. The amendment to PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation increasing the authorized number of shares of common stock requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the PharmAthene common stock outstanding and entitled to vote on the proposal. The approval of the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock in the merger, the approval of the proposal to amend the Bylaws of PharmAthene to limit the ability of the Board of Directors to remove Clifford J. Stocks, the expected Chief Executive Officer of the combined company, and the proposal to adjourn the meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies, each requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of PharmAthene common stock outstanding, entitled to vote on the proposal and present at the PharmAthene special meeting in person or by proxy. The election of nine persons to serve on the Board of Directors of PharmAthene requires the affirmative vote of holders of a plurality of PharmAthene common stock, entitled to vote on the proposal and present at the PharmAthene special meeting in person or by proxy. All PharmAthene officers and directors, and their affiliates, have entered into the PharmAthene Voting Agreement in connection with the merger. For a more complete discussion of the PharmAthene Voting Agreement, see the section entitled “VOTING AND OTHER AGREEMENTS — Voting and Lock-Up Agreements.”

16


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

As of September 3, 2013, all directors and executive officers of Theraclone, together with their affiliates, beneficially owned, in the aggregate, approximately 67% of the shares of Theraclone capital stock. Written consents are required from (i) the holders of at least (a) a majority of the outstanding shares of Theraclone common stock and preferred stock, voting together as a single class on an as-converted-to-common stock basis and (b) a majority of the outstanding shares of the Theraclone preferred stock, voting together as a single class on an as-converted-to-common stock basis each outstanding on the applicable record date, for the merger, the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and (ii) holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of Theraclone preferred stock for conversion of the shares of Theraclone preferred stock into shares of Theraclone common stock on a one-for-one basis. All Theraclone officers and directors, and their affiliates, have entered into the Theraclone Voting Agreement in connection with the merger. For a more complete discussion of the Theraclone Voting Agreement, see the section entitled “VOTING AND OTHER AGREEMENTS — Voting and Lock-Up Agreements.”

Directors and Officers of PharmAthene Following the Merger

Following the merger, and pursuant to the Board Composition Agreement expected to be entered into upon the completion of the merger, the Board of Directors of the combined company will be comprised of nine members, including five current members of the PharmAthene Board of Directors and three current members of the Theraclone Board of Directors and one additional member designated by Theraclone, as follows:

 
Name   Current Principal Affiliation
Mitchel B. Sayare, Ph.D.   PharmAthene
John M. Gill   PharmAthene
Steven Gillis, Ph.D.   Theraclone
Wende S. Hutton   Theraclone
Brian A. Markison   PharmAthene
Eric I. Richman   PharmAthene
Derace L. Schaffer, M.D.   PharmAthene
Clifford J. Stocks   Theraclone
     To Be Determined

Following the merger, the executive officers of the combined company will be as follows:

Clifford J. Stocks — Chief Executive Officer
Francesca Cook — Senior Vice President, Policy and Government Affairs
Russ Hawkinson — Chief Financial Officer
Jordan Karp — Senior Vice President, General Counsel
Eleanor Ramos, M.D. — Chief Medical Officer
Kristine Swiderek, Ph.D. — Chief Scientific Officer

For a more complete discussion of the management of the combined company after the merger, see the section entitled “MANAGEMENT OF THE COMBINED COMPANY.” A copy of the form of Board Composition Agreement is attached as Annex D to this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation.

Interests of PharmAthene’s Directors and Officers in the Merger

In considering the recommendation of the PharmAthene Board of Directors to PharmAthene stockholders to vote in favor of the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock in the merger, and the other matters to be acted upon by PharmAthene stockholders at the PharmAthene special meeting, PharmAthene stockholders should be aware that members of the PharmAthene Board of Directors and PharmAthene’s officers have interests in the merger that may be different from, or in addition to, or conflict with, the interests of PharmAthene stockholders.

17


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Interests of the PharmAthene directors and officers relate to the continuing service of Mitchel Sayare, Ph.D., John M. Gill, Brian A. Markison, Eric I. Richman, and Derace L. Schaffer, M.D., as directors of the combined company following completion of the merger and the payment of cash and equity compensation in consideration for such service, as described in more detail in the section entitled “Management of the Combined Company.”

On July 31, 2013, PharmAthene’s Board of Directors approved amendments to the employment agreements of PharmAthene’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer that will become effective immediately upon completion of the merger (and only if the merger is completed) and which will provide substantially the same benefits that Mr. Richman and Ms. Chang would have been entitled to receive under the severance plan adopted for all of PharmAthene’s executive officers in May 2012, or the PharmAthene Severance Plan, upon termination without cause or resignation for good reason within 12 months of a change of control of PharmAthene. Please see “THE MERGER — Employment Agreements and Severance and Change in Control Agreements — Termination Without Cause/For Good Reason After a Change of Control” for a description of such benefits. In addition to such benefits, the amendment will provide for acceleration of vesting of all outstanding equity-based awards held by Mr. Richman and Ms. Chang, and extend the exercise period applicable to their outstanding stock options until the third anniversary following their departure from service with PharmAthene and Linda Chang will also receive an additional lump sum payment for the costs associated with 18 months use of an automobile.

The following table sets forth the amount of potential payments and value of benefits that Mr. Richman and Ms. Chang would have received if their employment had been terminated in connection with the merger, assuming the merger had been completed on September 3, 2013.

         
Name   Cash Payments(1)   Value of Benefits(2)   Value of Options(3)   Excise Tax Gross Up(4)   Total
Eric I. Richman   $ 1,459,798     $ 54,000     $ 194,000     $ 599,144     $ 2,306,942  
Linda L. Chang   $ 620,100     $ 19,000     $ 114,000     $ 0     $ 753,100           

(1) Represents the sum of (i) an amount equal to 24 months’ worth of base salary for Mr. Richman and 18 months’ worth of base salary for Ms. Chang, (ii) an amount equal to 200% of the target annual cash bonus for Mr. Richman and 150% of the target annual cash bonus for Ms. Chang and (iii) for Ms. Chang, this amount includes a lump sum payment of $18,000 equal to the estimated costs associated with 18 months use of an automobile. According to their respective employment agreements, Mr. Richman’s target bonus is up to 60% of base salary and the target bonus for Ms. Chang is up to 30% of base salary.
(2) Estimated value of PharmAthene’s subsidy for group health insurance for 24 months and 18 months, respectively.
(3) The value of the automatic acceleration of the vesting of unvested stock options held by an executive is based on the difference between: (i) the market price of the shares of PharmAthene common stock underlying the unvested stock options held by such officer as of September 3, 2013, based on the average closing sale price of common stock from August 2, 2013 to August 8, 2013, representing the five business days following the announcement of the merger (i.e., $1.88), and (ii) the exercise price of the options, which range from $1.13 to $4.20 per share. Also included in this value is the value of unvested restricted shares. If the average closing price per share of PharmAthene’s common stock was below the exercise price of unvested stock option, there was no intrinsic value associated with that unvested award. On September 3, 2013. Under Mr. Richman’s employment agreement, if he is terminated without cause or if he resigns for good reason within twelve months of a change of control and no new employment agreement has been entered into within 90 days of such change of control, all equity-based awards held by Mr. Richman would be deemed fully vested as of the date of termination. The acceleration provisions for Ms. Chang are set forth in her stock option grant agreement.
(4) To the extent that Mr. Richman is subject to certain excise taxes under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, he is eligible for reimbursement of those excise taxes and any additional federal, state, local and excise tax resulting from such gross-up payments. The amount reported in the table is calculated assuming an excise tax rate of 20%. PharmAthene has assumed, for purposes of preparing this table, that $912,374 of Mr. Richman’s severance constitutes “reasonable compensation” for the restrictive covenants to which the executive is bound following the termination of employment. Accordingly, we

18


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

have not treated that portion of his severance as part of the amounts falling under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code. Such assumption may change at the time of an actual change of control. Linda Chang is subject to a “best executive choice” provision under which the executive can elect either to receive the amount other severance benefits, subject to the excise tax, if any, payable on excess parachute payments, or to reduce her severance payment to the extent necessary to prevent the imposition of such avoid triggering excise tax on such payment.

In addition, on July 31, 2013, the PharmAthene Board of Directors agreed to terminate the Severance Plan effective upon completion of the merger. The employment agreements of all other PharmAthene executive officers will be amended to increase the duration of the period during which the executives would receive severance benefits following a termination without cause or for good reason from six months to twelve months. Finally, the PharmAthene Board of Directors determined that all current members of the Board of Directors who would resign at the completion of the merger will receive director fees at current levels for one full quarter beyond the date of termination. The amendments to the employment agreements and the change in the fees payable to resigning directors will not become effective if the merger does not close.

The PharmAthene Board of Directors was aware of these potential conflicts of interest and considered them, among other matters, in reaching its decision to approve the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock, and to recommend that PharmAthene stockholders approve the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock in the merger and related matters. Other than full disclosure of these potential conflicts of interest, the PharmAthene Board of Directors did not take any other steps to alleviate such potential conflicts of interest since it did not consider such potential conflicts of interest to be material in connection with its decision to approve the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock.

For a more complete discussion of the interests of the directors and executive officers of PharmAthene in the merger, see the section entitled “THE MERGER — Interests of PharmAthene’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger.”

Interests of Theraclone’s Directors and Officers in the Merger

In considering the recommendation of the Theraclone Board of Directors to Theraclone stockholders to approve the merger and to adopt and approve the Merger Agreement, and the other matters to be acted upon by Theraclone stockholders in the Theraclone written consent, Theraclone stockholders should be aware that members of the Theraclone Board of Directors and Theraclone’s officers have interests in the merger that may be different from, in addition to, or may conflict with the interests of Theraclone stockholders.

These interests include the beneficial ownership interests of Theraclone directors and officers in shares of Theraclone capital stock and securities to be converted to PharmAthene common stock and rights to purchase PharmAthene common stock in the merger, the assumption of all stock options held by the Theraclone executive officers and board members upon the completion of the merger, the agreement that Steven Gillis, Ph.D., Wende S. Hutton and Clifford J. Stocks, each a Theraclone director, will continue to serve on the Board of Directors of the combined company following the consummation of the merger, the agreement that Mr. Stocks, Russ Hawkinson, Eleanor Ramos, M.D., and Kristine Swiderek, Ph.D., each a Theraclone executive officer, will continue to serve as executive officers of the combined company following the consummation of the merger and the continued indemnification of former Theraclone executive officers and board members.

As of September 3, 2013, directors and executive officers of Theraclone, together with their respective affiliates, owned and were entitled to vote, in the aggregate, 24,552,617 shares of Theraclone capital stock, or approximately 62% of the shares of Theraclone capital stock outstanding on that date. For a more complete discussion of the interests of the directors and executive officers of Theraclone in the merger, see the section entitled “THE MERGER — Interests of Theraclone’s Directors and Officers in the Merger.”

Assumption of Theraclone Stock Options and Warrants and Theraclone 2004 Option Plan

All outstanding Theraclone options, as well as Theraclone’s 2004 Option Plan, will be assumed by PharmAthene following the merger. Each option or warrant to purchase shares of Theraclone common stock or preferred stock will be converted into an option or warrant, as the case may be, to purchase a number of

19


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

shares of PharmAthene common stock representing the number of Theraclone shares of common stock or preferred stock for which the exchanged option or warrant was exercisable multiplied by the Exchange Ratio. The exercise price will be proportionately adjusted. PharmAthene will assume Theraclone’s 2004 Option Plan, and the terms and conditions of all Theraclone options and warrants exchanged in the merger for PharmAthene options and warrants will be unchanged.

For a more complete discussion of the treatment of Theraclone options and warrants, see the section entitled “THE MERGER AGREEMENT — Merger Consideration.”

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger

The merger is intended to qualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code and Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder. As a result of the “reorganization,” Theraclone stockholders generally will not recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes upon the exchange of their shares of Theraclone common stock for shares of PharmAthene common stock in connection with the merger. However, if a Theraclone stockholder receives cash in lieu of a fractional share of PharmAthene common stock, then such stockholder generally will recognize gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between such stockholder’s adjusted tax basis in the fractional share and the amount of cash received. Moreover, a Theraclone stockholder who perfects appraisal rights and receives cash in exchange for such stockholder’s shares of Theraclone capital stock will recognize gain or loss measured by the difference between the amount of cash received and such stockholder’s adjusted tax basis in those shares. PharmAthene stockholders generally will not recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a result of the merger.

Tax matters are very complicated, and the tax consequences of the merger to a particular PharmAthene or Theraclone stockholder will depend in part on such stockholder’s circumstances. Accordingly, PharmAthene and Theraclone urge you to consult your own tax advisor for a full understanding of the tax consequences of the merger to you, including the applicability and effect of federal, state, local and foreign income and other tax laws. For a more complete discussion of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger, see the section entitled “MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER.”

Regulatory Approvals

Neither PharmAthene nor Theraclone is required to make any filings or to obtain any approvals or clearances from any antitrust regulatory authorities in the United States or other countries to consummate the merger. In the United States, PharmAthene must comply with applicable federal and state securities laws and rules and regulations of the NYSE MKT in connection with the issuance and listing of shares of PharmAthene common stock in the merger, including the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, of the registration statement of which this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation is a part. For a more complete discussion of the regulatory approvals required in connection with the merger, see the section entitled “THE MERGER — Regulatory Approvals.”

Anticipated Accounting Treatment

Under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or the U.S. GAAP, Accounting Standards Codification 805 “Business Combinations,” or ASC 805, the merger is expected to be accounted for using acquisition accounting pursuant to which PharmAthene is considered the acquiring entity for accounting purposes. As such, PharmAthene expects to allocate the total purchase consideration to Theraclone’s tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values at the date of the completion of the merger. The allocation reflected in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information included in this prospectus is preliminary and subject to change.

For a more complete discussion of the anticipated accounting treatment of the merger, see the sections entitled “The Merger — Anticipated Accounting Treatment” and “SELECTED HISTORICAL AND UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION.”

20


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Appraisal Rights

If the merger is completed, Theraclone stockholders are entitled to appraisal rights under Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or the DGCL. PharmAthene stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the merger. For a more complete discussion of the appraisal rights, see the provisions of Section 262 of the DGCL, referred to as Section 262, and attached to this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation as Annex G, and the section entitled “THE MERGER — Appraisal Rights.”

Comparison of Stockholder Rights

Both PharmAthene and Theraclone are incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware, accordingly the rights of the stockholders of each company are currently, and will continue to be, governed by the DGCL and their respective Certificates of Incorporation and Bylaws. If the merger is completed, Theraclone stockholders will become stockholders of PharmAthene, and their rights will be governed by the DGCL, the Certificate of Incorporation of PharmAthene and the Bylaws of PharmAthene. The rights of PharmAthene contained in the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of PharmAthene differ from the rights of Theraclone stockholders under the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of Theraclone, as more fully described under the section entitled “COMPARISON OF RIGHTS OF STOCKHOLDERS.”

21


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SELECTED HISTORICAL AND UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL DATA

Selected Historical Financial Data of PharmAthene

You should read the following selected consolidated financial data together with PharmAthene’s consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation and with the section entitled “PHARMATHENE’S MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.”

PharmAthene has derived the consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2011 and 2012 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2011 and 2012 from PharmAthene’s audited consolidated financial statements, which are included elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation. PharmAthene has derived the consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 from PharmAthene’s audited consolidated financial statements, which are not included elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation. PharmAthene has derived the consolidated statement of operations data for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of June 30, 2012 and 2013 from PharmAthene’s unaudited consolidated financial statements, which are included elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation. PharmAthene’s historical results for any prior period are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in any future period.

             
  Years Ended December 31,   Six Months Ended
June 30,
     2008   2009   2010   2011   2012   2012   2013
Statements of operations data:
                                                              
Revenue   $ 34,179,363     $ 27,549,978     $ 20,993,605     $ 24,266,274     $ 25,175,887     $ 12,466,060     $ 10,770,538  
Operating expenses:
                                                              
Research and
development
    31,812,431       30,219,758       20,875,536       21,219,853       19,509,629       9,624,012       8,636,020  
General and
administrative
    19,397,532       22,432,585       18,015,761       14,311,079       11,628,732       5,728,580       4,612,525  
Acquired in-process research and development     16,131,002                                      
Depreciation and amortization (including $4,635,489 impairment charges in 2010)     813,891       872,304       5,655,865       461,073       303,916       162,358       94,456  
Total operating expenses     68,154,856       53,524,647       44,547,162       35,992,005       31,442,277       15,514,950       13,343,001  
Loss from operations     (33,975,493 )      (25,974,669 )      (23,553,557 )      (11,725,731 )      (6,266,390 )      (3,048,900 )      (2,572,463 ) 
Other income (expense):
                                                              
Interest income     1,225,471       269,133       6,955       16,660       17,808       7,807       2,439  
Interest expense     (2,573,406 )      (2,837,302 )      (5,936,480 )      (54,573 )      (342,561 )      (114,381 )      (199,818 ) 
Change in fair value of derivative instruments     118,244       1,043,782       (5,457,550 )      7,144,983       591,039       (167,853 )      (552,953 ) 
Other income (expense)     58,106       (90,655 )      91,355       39,328       47,862       53,434       (4,013 ) 
Realization of cumulative translation adjustment                             1,227,656              
Gain on the sale of assets held for sale                       781,760                    
Loss on the early extinguishment of debt           (4,690,049 )                               
Total other income (expense)     (1,171,585 )      (6,305,091 )      (11,295,720 )      7,928,158       1,541,804       (220,993 )      (754,345 ) 
Net loss before income taxes     (35,147,078 )      (32,279,760 )      (34,849,277 )      (3,797,573 )      (4,724,586 )      (3,269,893 )      (3,326,808 ) 
Provision for income taxes                             (195,529 )      (166,538 )      (20,949 ) 
Net loss   $ (35,147,078 )    $ (32,279,760 )    $ (34,849,277 )    $ (3,797,573 )    $ (4,920,115 )      (3,436,431 )      (3,347,757 ) 
Basic and diluted net loss per share   $ (1.53 )    $ (1.17 )    $ (1.08 )    $ (0.08 )    $ (0.10 )      (0.07 )      (0.07 ) 
Weighted average shares used in calculation of basic and diluted net loss per share     22,944,066       27,575,332       32,309,621       47,331,763       48,323,067       48,297,919       49,058,014  

22


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

           
  As of December 31,   As of
June 30,
     2008   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013  
Balance Sheet Data:
                                                     
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 19,752,404     $ 2,673,567     $ 11,785,327     $ 11,236,771     $ 12,701,517     $ 15,789,909  
Working capital     11,536,932       12,018,438       17,420,242       14,997,664       12,307,429       13,970,065  
Total assets     57,659,305       35,333,049       27,199,045       22,803,509       22,741,404       24,586,911  
Total long-term liabilities     1,554,698       18,714,430       8,824,853       2,336,361       3,579,148       3,644,082  
Total stockholders' equity     20,231,474       3,152,399       12,210,705       15,851,806       11,673,840       13,220,444  

23


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Selected Historical Financial Data of Theraclone

The selected statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 and the selected balance sheet data as of December 31, 2011 and 2012 are derived from Theraclone’s audited financial statements included elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation. The selected statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 and the selected balance sheet data as of December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 are derived from Theraclone’s audited financial statements which are not included in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation.

The selected statement of operations data for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013 and the selected balance sheet data as of June 30, 2013 have been derived from Theraclone’s unaudited condensed financial statements included elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation. The unaudited interim financial information has been prepared on the same basis as the annual financial statements and, in the opinion of Theraclone’s management, reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly Theraclone’s financial position as of June 30, 2013 and the results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013.

Historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected in the future and interim results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full year. You should read the selected historical financial data below in conjunction with the section titled “Theraclone’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation.

             
  Years Ended December 31,   Six Months Ended
June 30,
     2008   2009   2010   2011   2012   2012   2013
     (in thousands, except per share data)
Statement of Operations Data
                                                              
Revenue   $ 385     $ 738     $ 4,591     $ 8,384     $ 19,360     $ 4,167     $ 4,495  
Operating expenses:
                                                              
Research and development     9,354       7,316       10,293       14,816       19,611       6,594       5,608  
General and administrative     2,654       1,924       1,949       1,827       2,461       1,100       1,390  
Total operating expenses     12,008       9,240       12,242       16,643       22,072       7,694       6,998  
Loss from operations     (11,623 )      (8,502 )      (7,651 )      (8,259 )      (2,712 )      (3,527 )      (2,503 ) 
Other income (expense):
                                                              
Change in fair value of financial instruments     25       7       (22 )      4       3             228  
Interest income     388       7       2       1                    
Interest expense     (200 )      (217 )      (147 )      (104 )      (69 )      (37 )      (107 ) 
Grant income                 978                          
Net loss     (11,410 )      (8,705 )      (6,840 )      (8,358 )      (2,778 )      (3,564 )      (2,382 ) 
Comprehensive loss     (11,410 )      (8,705 )      (6,840 )      (8,358 )      (2,778 )      (3,564 )      (2,382 ) 
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock     (2,071 )      (2,064 )      (2,136 )      (2,381 )      (2,826 )      (1,417 )      (1,429 ) 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders   $ (13,481 )    $ (10,769 )    $ (8,976 )    $ (10,739 )    $ (5,604 )    $ (4,981 )    $ (3,811 ) 
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders – basic and diluted   $ (11.46 )    $ (8.46 )    $ (6.96 )    $ (8.07 )    $ (4.16 )    $ (3.70 )    $ (1.98 ) 
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic and diluted     1,176,527       1,272,915       1,289,687       1,330,968       1,346,898       1,346,898       1,919,767  

24


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

           
  As of December 31,   As of
June 30,
     2008   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013
     (amounts in thousands)
Selected Balance Sheet Data
                                                     
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 15,630     $ 9,022     $ 9,146     $ 15,799     $ 5,426     $ 7,215  
Working capital     13,850       5,167       2,348       4,367       774       4,630  
Total assets     18,734       11,586       15,157       18,474       8,975       9,533  
Notes payable     2,058       1,478       829       1,104       812       3,465  
Redeemable convertible preferred stock warrant liability     17       10       32       51       48       175  
Redeemable convertible preferred stock     37,916       39,980       43,216       57,182       60,008       63,996  
Accumulated deficit     (22,958 )      (33,547 )      (42,442 )      (53,015 )      (58,444 )      (61,024 ) 
Total stockholders' deficit     (22,957 )      (33,546 )      (42,441 )      (53,014 )      (58,443 )      (61,022 ) 

Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Data of PharmAthene and Theraclone

The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of June 30, 2013 and the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012 are based on the historical financial statements of PharmAthene and Theraclone after giving effect to the merger. The merger will be accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2013 gives effect to the merger as if it had occurred on January 1, 2013. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2012 gives effect to the merger as if it had occurred on January 1, 2012. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of June 30, 2013 assumes that the merger took place on June 30, 2013.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements are provided for informational purposes only, are subject to a number of uncertainties and assumptions, do not purport to represent what the companies’ actual performance or financial position would have been had the merger occurred on the dates indicated and do not purport to indicate the financial position or results of operations as of any future date or for any future period. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet and statement of operations as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was derived from (i) PharmAthene’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2013 as included in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation and (ii) Theraclone’s unaudited financial statements as of and for the six month period ended June 30, 2013 as included in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2012 was derived from (i) PharmAthene’s audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 as included in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation and (ii) Theraclone’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 as included in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation.

The pro forma condensed combined financial statements reflect the best estimate by PharmAthene’s management of the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimates prepared by PharmAthene’s and Theraclone’s management and based on information currently available. Upon completion of the merger, and as third-party valuations are performed, increases or decreases in the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed will result in adjustments, which may be material to the balance sheet and/or statement of operations.

As required, the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial data includes adjustments which give effect to the events that are directly attributable to the merger, expected to have a continuing impact and factually supportable. Accordingly, any planned adjustments affecting the balance sheet, statement of operations or changes in common stock outstanding, subsequent to the assumed closing date of the merger, are not included.

25


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PharmAthene, Inc.
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet
As of June 30, 2013

         
  Historical        Pro Forma
Adjustments
  Combined
Pro Forma
     PharmAthene   Theraclone
Current assets
                                            
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 15,790,000     $ 7,215,000       E     $ 4,000,000     $ 27,005,000  
Billed accounts receivable     1,540,000       608,000                      2,148,000  
Unbilled accounts receivable     3,695,000                            3,695,000  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets     668,000       262,000                      930,000  
Redeemable convertible preferred stock forward contract           53,000       C       (53,000 )       
Total current assets     21,693,000       8,138,000                3,947,000       33,778,000  
Property and equipment, net     460,000       1,267,000                      1,727,000  
Other long term assets and deferred costs     86,000       128,000                      214,000  
Identifiable intangible assets                 B       44,625,000       44,625,000  
Goodwill     2,348,000             B       33,676,000       36,024,000  
Total Assets   $ 24,587,000     $ 9,533,000           $ 82,248,000     $ 116,368,000  
Current liabilities
                                            
Accounts payable   $ 2,993,000     $ 181,000       D     $ 5,170,000     $ 10,494,000  
                         F       2,150,000           
Accrued expenses and other liabilities     2,054,000       1,419,000                      3,473,000  
Deferred revenue     508,000       916,000                      1,424,000  
Current portion of long-term debt     1,000,000       992,000                      1,992,000  
Short-term debt     1,168,000                         1,168,000  
Total current liabilities     7,723,000       3,508,000                7,320,000       18,551,000  
Other long-term liabilities     578,000       403,000       H       (403,000 )      578,000  
Long-term debt, less current portion     1,218,000       2,473,000                      3,691,000  
Derivative instruments     1,848,000       175,000       C       (831,000 )      1,848,000  
                         E       656,000           
Total liabilities     11,367,000       6,559,000                6,742,000       24,668,000  
Redeemable convertible preferred stock
                                            
Redeemable convertible preferred stock           63,996,000       C       (63,996,000 )       
                         C       (4,000,000 )          
                         E       4,000,000           
Stockholders' equity
                                            
Common stock     5,000       2,000       C       (2,000 )      9,000  
                         A       4,000           
Additional paid-in-capital     215,393,000             C       656,000       301,539,000  
                         A       69,096,000           
                         A       8,300,000           
                         A       1,275,000           
                         A       7,125,000           
                         E       (656,000 )          
                         F       350,000           
Accumulated other comprehensive loss     (220,000 )                              (220,000 ) 
Accumulated deficit     (201,958,000 )      (61,024,000 )      C       61,024,000       (209,628,000 ) 
                         D       (5,170,000 )          
                         F       (2,500,000 )          
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)     13,220,000       (61,022,000 )            139,502,000       91,700,000  
Total liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders’ equity (deficit)   $ 24,587,000     $ 9,533,000           $ 82,248,000     $ 116,368,000  

26


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PharmAthene, Inc.
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Operations
For the six months ended June 30, 2013

         
  Historical        Pro Forma
Adjustments
  Combined
Pro Forma
     PharmAthene   Theraclone
Revenue
                                            
Revenue   $ 10,771,000     $ 4,495,000              $     $ 15,266,000  
Operating expenses:
                                            
Research and development     8,636,000       5,325,000       G       345,000       14,327,000  
                         H       21,000           
General and administrative including transaction fees     4,613,000       1,384,000       D       (230,000 )      6,364,000  
                         G       593,000           
                         H       4,000           
Depreciation     94,000       289,000                   383,000  
Total operating expenses     13,343,000       6,998,000             733,000       21,074,000  
Loss from operations     (2,572,000 )      (2,503,000 )            (733,000 )      (5,808,000 ) 
Other income (expense):
                                            
Interest income     2,000                         2,000  
Interest expense     (200,000 )      (107,000 )                     (307,000 ) 
Change in fair value of derivative instruments     (553,000 )      228,000       C       (228,000 )      (553,000 ) 
Other income (expense), net     (4,000 )                        (4,000 ) 
Total other income (expense)     (755,000 )      121,000                (228,000 )      (862,000 ) 
Net loss before provision for income taxes     (3,327,000 )      (2,382,000 )               (961,000 )      (6,670,000 ) 
Provision for income taxes     (21,000 )                        (21,000 ) 
Net loss     (3,348,000 )      (2,382,000 )               (961,000 )      (6,691,000 ) 
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock           (1,429,000 )      C       1,429,000        
Net loss attributable to common stockholders – basic and diluted   $ (3,348,000 )    $ (3,811,000 )          $ 468,000     $ (6,691,000 ) 
Earnings per share
                                            
Basic   $ (0.07 )               I              $ (0.07 ) 
Diluted   $ (0.07 )               I              $ (0.07 ) 
Weighted average outstanding shares – basic     49,058,014                                  92,519,650  
Weighted average outstanding shares – diluted     49,058,014                                  92,519,650  

27


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PharmAthene, Inc.
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Operations
For the year ended December 31, 2012

         
  Historical        Pro Forma
Adjustments
  Combined
Pro Forma
     PharmAthene   Theraclone
Revenue
                                            
Revenue   $ 25,176,000     $ 19,360,000              $     $ 44,536,000  
Operating expenses
                                            
Research and development     19,509,000       18,797,000       G       687,000       39,090,000  
                         H       97,000           
General and administrative     11,629,000       2,439,000       G       1,183,000       15,270,000  
                         H       19,000           
Depreciation     304,000       836,000                   1,140,000  
Total operating expenses     31,442,000       22,072,000             1,986,000       55,500,000  
Loss from operations     (6,266,000 )      (2,712,000 )               (1,986,000 )      (10,964,000 ) 
Other income (expense):
                                            
Interest income     18,000                            18,000  
Interest expense     (343,000 )      (69,000 )                     (412,000 ) 
Change in fair value of derivative instruments     591,000       3,000       C       (3,000 )      591,000  
Realization of cumulative translation adjustment     1,228,000                            1,228,000  
Other income (expense), net     48,000                         48,000  
Total other income (expense)     1,542,000       (66,000 )            (3,000 )      1,473,000  
Net loss before provision for income taxes     (4,724,000 )      (2,778,000 )            (1,989,000 )      (9,491,000 ) 
Provision for income taxes     (196,000 )                        (196,000 ) 
Net loss     (4,920,000 )      (2,778,000 )            (1,989,000 )      (9,687,000 ) 
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock           (2,826,000 )      C       2,826,000        
Net loss attributable to common stockholders – basic and diluted   $ (4,920,000 )    $ (5,604,000 )          $ 837,000     $ (9,687,000 ) 
Earnings per share
                                            
Basic   $ (0.10 )               I              $ (0.11 ) 
Diluted   $ (0.10 )               I              $ (0.11 ) 
Weighted average outstanding shares – basic     48,323,067                                  91,784,703  
Weighted average outstanding shares – diluted     48,323,067                                  91,784,703  

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Combined Pro Forma Financial Statements

Note 1. Description of the Merger

PharmAthene and its wholly owned merger subsidiary entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Theraclone, a Delaware corporation, and Steven Gillis, Ph.D., as Securityholders’ Representative, dated July 31, 2013, referred to as the Merger Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, at closing PharmAthene will acquire all of the issued and outstanding common stock and equity-linked securities of Theraclone in a transaction structured as a tax-free exchange. Theraclone will become a wholly owned subsidiary of PharmAthene.

The Merger Agreement is subject to numerous closing conditions, including but not limited to:

approval of the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock in connection with the merger, and approval of an increase in the authorized number of shares of common stock, by PharmAthene’s stockholders and the adoption and approval of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby by Theraclone’s stockholders;
the effectiveness of the registration statement on Form S-4 of which this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation is a part;
approval for listing on the NYSE MKT of shares of PharmAthene common stock to be issued in connection with the merger;
exercise of appraisal rights by no more than 5% of PharmAthene’s stockholders;

28


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

all $8,000,000 of capital committed to Theraclone pursuant to its Series B-1 Preferred Stock and Warrant Purchase and Exchange Agreement shall have been delivered to Theraclone; and
other customary closing conditions.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2013 gives effect to the merger as if it had occurred on January 1, 2013. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2012 gives effect to the merger as if it had occurred on January 1, 2012. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of June 30, 2013 assumes that the merger took place on June 30, 2013.

Purchase Consideration

Prior to the merger, Theraclone’s preferred stockholders will convert such holdings into shares of Theraclone’s common stock on a one-for-one basis. In addition, Theraclone’s outstanding stock purchase warrants to purchase preferred stock will be exchanged into stock purchase warrants to purchase common stock.

PharmAthene will issue, as consideration for the merger, shares of its common stock in exchange for shares of Theraclone’s common stock, on a formulaic basis as outlined in the Merger Agreement. As of June 30, 2013, the Exchange Ratio was estimated to be approximately 1.096 shares of PharmAthene common stock for every share of Theraclone common stock outstanding. Based on this Exchange Ratio, and the number of outstanding shares as of June 30, 2013, PharmAthene estimated it would issue a total of 43,461,636 shares of its common stock in exchange for all of the outstanding common stock of Theraclone.

In addition, PharmAthene is contractually obligated to issue new options to acquire its common stock, or the Replacement Options, and new warrants to acquire its common stock, or the Replacement Warrants, to the holders of Theraclone’s stock options and stock purchase warrants, in exchange for such options and warrants, using the same Exchange Ratio. The Replacement Options and Replacement Warrants will have the same terms and conditions as those that existed with Theraclone, except that the number of shares of common stock to be acquired, and the exercise prices, will be adjusted based on the Exchange Ratio. Based on the Exchange Ratio, and the number of outstanding stock options and stock purchase warrants as of June 30, 2013, PharmAthene estimated it would issue a total of 9,615,618 Replacement Options and 6,144,026 Replacement Warrants in exchange for all of the outstanding options and warrants of Theraclone.

A portion of the Replacement Options is tied to future employment by PharmAthene and vest during a post-combination service period and will be expensed during such service period.

Note 2. Basis of Pro Forma Presentation

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements have been prepared based on PharmAthene’s and Theraclone’s historical financial information. Certain disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States have been condensed or omitted as permitted by SEC rules and regulations. Certain amounts contained in Theraclone’s financial statements have been reclassified to conform to PharmAthene’s financial statement presentation; these reclassifications related to depreciation expense and had no effect on Theraclone’s net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2013 or year ended December 31, 2012.

The fair value of PharmAthene’s common stock was calculated using the closing stock price for PharmAthene’s common stock at June 30, 2013 which was $1.59. The fair values of the Replacement Warrants and the vested Replacement Options were calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, and includes the use of unobservable inputs such as the expected term, anticipated volatility and expected dividends.

29


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Note 3. Acquisition Method of Accounting

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements reflect accounting for the merger in accordance with the acquisition method of accounting. Under the acquisition method, the purchase consideration is allocated to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values, with any excess of the purchase consideration over the estimated fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired being recorded as goodwill.

The following table demonstrates the allocation of the purchase consideration to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed on June 30, 2013, based on their estimated fair values:

 
  Estimated Fair
Value
Purchase Consideration:
        
Common Stock   $ 69,100,000  
Replacement Warrants     9,575,000  
Replacement Options     7,125,000  
Total Consideration   $ 85,800,000  
Tangible Assets Acquired:
        
Cash   $ 11,215,000  
Receivables     608,000  
Property and Equipment, Net     1,267,000  
Other     390,000  
Net Deferred Tax Assets      
Identifiable Intangible Assets Acquired:
        
IPR&D Technology     44,625,000  
Liabilities Assumed:
        
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses     1,600,000  
Note Payable     3,465,000  
Deferred Revenue     916,000  
Goodwill     33,676,000  
     $ 85,800,000  

Based on a preliminary assessment, which may change once additional information is obtained and final valuations are performed, the identifiable intangible assets that PharmAthene has identified relate to in-process research and development, or IPR&D, associated with Theraclone’s two lead product candidates TCN-032 and TCN-202. Identifiable intangible assets associated with IPR&D are initially classified as indefinite lived; such classification will be reassessed every reporting period based on the status of the research and development projects. Goodwill is also considered an indefinite lived asset. Acquired deferred tax assets, net of deferred tax liabilities have been reduced by a full valuation allowance for this amount given management’s assessment of the likelihood that the deferred assets will be realized; these amounts are reflected on a net basis in the above table.

Note 4. Pro Forma Assumptions and Adjustments

The following assumptions and adjustments apply to the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements:

A) Represents the pro forma payment of the purchase consideration, including the fair value of the (i) common stock, (ii) vested Replacement Options, and (iii) Replacement Warrants. Based on their terms, the Replacement Options and Replacement Warrants are classified as equity.
B) Represents the pro forma impact of the allocation of the purchase consideration to the (i) tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired, (ii) liabilities assumed, and (iii) goodwill.

30


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

C) Represents the pro forma elimination as a result of the merger of (i) Theraclone’s historical equity (permanent and temporary) accounts and temporary-equity-linked securities classified as assets or liabilities as of June 30, 2013, (ii) the change in fair value of Theraclone’s temporary-equity-linked securities classified as liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012, and (iii) accretion of Theraclone’s preferred stock dividends for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012.
D) Represents the pro forma impact to the balance sheet of accruing approximately $5,170,000 of expenses in connection with the merger, or Transaction Expenses, that are expected to be incurred after June 30, 2013 (including changes made to board of director compensation arrangements), and to the statement of operations of eliminating approximately $230,000 of Transaction Expenses that were incurred in the six month period ended June 30, 2013 by PharmAthene and Theraclone.
E) Represents the pro forma issuance of 2,666,667 shares of Theraclone’s preferred stock and related warrants to purchase 465,228 shares of preferred stock at a purchase price of $1.50 per share and an exercise price of $0.01 per share (which occurred after June 30, 2013 and was a condition to closing under the terms of the Merger Agreement) and the related receipt of $4,000,000 of gross proceeds.
F) Represents the pro forma impact to the balance sheet to record modifications made to employment agreements associated with PharmAthene’s departing Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer accounted for as Transaction Expenses, incurred as a result of the merger.
G) Represents adjustments made to stock-based compensation expense for unvested Replacement Options granted to Theraclone employees that vest during a post-merger service period. The fair value of the stock options was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
H) Represents the elimination of Theraclone’s deferred rent as of June 30, 2013, and the elimination of the amortization of deferred rent for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012, since deferred rent does not meet the definition of an asset or liability in purchase accounting. Also represents the amortization of new deferred rent as if the merger occurred on either January 1, 2012 or 2013.
I) Pro forma loss per share, basic and diluted, includes the pro forma impacts of issuance of the purchase consideration and is calculated as follows:

   
  Basic and Diluted
     Six Months Ended
June 30, 2013
  Year Ended
December 31, 2012
Net loss available to common stockholders, as originally reported   $ (3,348,000 )    $ (4,920,000 ) 
Pro forma net loss available to common stockholders   $ (6,691,000 )    $ (9,687,000 ) 
Weighted Average outstanding shares for the period, as originally reported     49,058,014       48,323,067  
Pro forma adjustments:
                 
Common shares issued to Theraclone stockholders     43,461,636       43,461,636  
Pro forma weighted average outstanding shares for the period     92,519,650       91,784,703  
Earnings loss per share basic and diluted, as originally reported   $ (0.07 )    $ (0.10 ) 
Pro forma earnings loss per share basic and diluted   $ (0.07 )    $ (0.11 ) 

31


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Comparative Historical and Unaudited Pro Forma Per Share

The information below reflects:

the historical net loss and book value per share of PharmAthene and the historical net loss and book value per share of Theraclone common stock in comparison with the unaudited pro forma net loss and book value per share after giving effect to the proposed merger of PharmAthene with Theraclone on a purchase basis; and
the equivalent historical net loss per share attributable to shares of PharmAthene common stock which will be issued in the merger.

You should read the tables below in conjunction with the respective audited and unaudited financial statements of PharmAthene and Theraclone and related notes, and the unaudited pro forma condensed financial information and related notes included elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation.

   
  As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2012   As of and for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
PharmAthene Historical Data
                 
Basic and diluted net loss per common share:   $ (.10 )    $ (.07 ) 
Book value per share            $ .26  
Theraclone Historical Data
                 
Basic and diluted net loss per common share:   $ (4.16 )    $ (1.98 ) 
Book value per share            $ (26.80 ) 
Combined Company Pro Forma Data
                 
Basic and diluted net loss per common share:   $ (.11 )    $ (.07 ) 
Book value per share              .97  
PharmAthene Pro Forma Equivalent Data(1)
                 
Basic and diluted net loss per common share:   $ (.12 )    $ (.08 ) 
Book value per share            $ 1.06  

(1) Pro forma equivalent amounts are calculated by multiplying pro forma combined per share amounts by the Exchange Ratio of 1.096.

32


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION

PharmAthene

PharmAthene’s common stock trades on the NYSE MKT (formerly NYSE Amex) under the symbol “PIP”. The following table sets forth the range of high and low sales prices per share of PharmAthene’s common stock on the NYSE MKT for the past two years during the periods shown.

   
Fiscal Year 2013   High   Low
3rd Quarter Ended September 30 (through September 3)   $ 2.42     $ 1.53  
2nd Quarter Ended June 30   $ 2.20     $ 1.47  
1st Quarter Ended March 31   $ 2.05     $ 1.02  

   
Fiscal Year 2012   High   Low
4th Quarter Ended December 31   $ 1.47     $ .98  
3rd Quarter Ended September 30   $ 1.70     $ 1.13  
2nd Quarter Ended June 30   $ 1.89     $ 1.18  
1st Quarter Ended March 31   $ 2.10     $ 1.20  

   
Fiscal Year 2011   High   Low
4th Quarter Ended December 31   $ 1.88     $ 1.07  
3rd Quarter Ended September 30   $ 3.35     $ 1.74  
2nd Quarter Ended June 30   $ 4.08     $ 2.41  
1st Quarter Ended March 31   $ 4.58     $ 3.01  

On July 31, 2013, the last trading day prior to announcement of the merger, the last reported sale price of PharmAthene common stock was $1.77, for an aggregate market value of PharmAthene of approximately $92.6 million, or approximately $106.8 million on a fully diluted basis (excluding PharmAthene warrants and options with an exercise price of more than $2.50 per share). Upon completion of the merger, assuming it was completed on July 31, 2013 and an aggregate of 60,316,126 shares of PharmAthene common stock were issued, the market value attributable to the Theraclone capital stock of the outstanding equity of the combined company calculated on a fully diluted basis, which would represent approximately 50% (excluding PharmAthene warrants and options with an exercise price of more than $2.50 per share), would equal approximately $106.8 million. On September 3, 2013, the latest practicable date before the filing of this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation, the last reported sale price of PharmAthene common stock was $2.17, for an aggregate market value of PharmAthene of approximately $113.5 million, or approximately $130.9 million on a fully diluted basis (excluding PharmAthene warrants and options with an exercise price of more than $2.50 per share). Upon completion of the merger, assuming it was completed on September 3, 2013 and an aggregate of 60,316,126 shares of PharmAthene common stock were issued, the market value attributable to the Theraclone capital stock of the outstanding equity of the combined company calculated on a fully diluted basis, which would represent approximately 50% (excluding PharmAthene warrants and options with an exercise price of more than $2.50) would equal approximately $130.9 million.

Holders

As of September 3, 2013, PharmAthene had 73 record holders of its common stock. The number of record holders is based on the actual number of holders registered on the books of PharmAthene’s transfer agent and does not reflect holders of shares in “street name” or persons, partnerships, associations, corporations or other entities identified in security position listings maintained by depository trust companies.

Theraclone

Theraclone is a privately-held company, and there is no established trading market for its securities. As of September 3, 2013, there were 2,335,152 shares of Theraclone common stock outstanding, 4,765,145 shares of Theraclone Series A-1 convertible preferred stock outstanding and 32,608,456 shares of Theraclone Series B-1 convertible preferred stock outstanding, and there were approximately 35 holders of record of Theraclone capital stock.

33


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Dividends

PharmAthene has not paid any dividends on its common stock in 2013, 2012 and 2011 and does not intend to declare any dividends in the foreseeable future. While subject to periodic review, the current policy of the PharmAthene Board of Directors is to retain all earnings, if any, primarily to finance future growth. The Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of March 30, 2012 (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time), among General Electric Capital Corporation, the Lenders (as defined therein), PharmAthene, Inc., and any other Loan Parties (as defined therein), or the GE Loan Agreement, entered into in March 2012 specifically restricts the declaration or payment of any dividends. PharmAthene makes no assurances that it will ever pay dividends, cash or otherwise. Whether PharmAthene pays any dividends in the future will depend on its financial condition, results of operations, general business conditions and any other factors that the PharmAthene Board of Directors will consider.

Theraclone has never declared or paid any cash dividends on its capital stock nor does it intend to do so in the foreseeable future. Theraclone’s credit and loan agreements restrict the payment of any cash dividends.

34


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

RISK FACTORS

Stockholders and potential investors should carefully consider the risks described below relating to the Merger, an investment in PharmAthene’s common stock and the business of PharmAthene and Theraclone. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones PharmAthene and Theraclone face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to PharmAthene or Theraclone that they currently consider immaterial may also impair their business operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, PharmAthene’s and Theraclone’s business, financial conditions and/or results of operations could be materially adversely affected, the trading price of PharmAthene’s common stock could decline and a stockholder could lose all or part of his or her investment.

Risks Related to the Proposed Merger

The issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock to Theraclone stockholders in the merger will dilute substantially the voting power of current PharmAthene stockholders.

Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, at the Effective Time, all outstanding shares of Theraclone common stock will be converted into shares of PharmAthene common stock. Upon completion of the merger, the PharmAthene security holders will own 50% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, and Theraclone security holders will own 50% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, in each case, on an as converted and fully diluted basis but excluding PharmAthene warrants and options with an exercise price of more than $2.50 per share. Based on the number of outstanding securities of each company as of September 3, 2013, (i) if no PharmAthene or Theraclone options or warrants are exercised prior to the completion of the merger, PharmAthene and Theraclone security holders would own, respectively, approximately 54.1% and 45.9% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the combined company and (ii) if PharmAthene warrants and options with an exercise price of more than $2.50 per share are exercised, to the extent such exercises occur, PharmAthene and Theraclone security holders could own, respectively, between approximately 51.5% and 50.0% and 48.5% and 50.0% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, on a fully diluted basis. Accordingly, the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock to Theraclone stockholders in the merger will reduce significantly the relative voting power of each share of PharmAthene common stock held by current PharmAthene stockholders. Consequently, PharmAthene stockholders as a group will have significantly less influence over the management and policies of the combined company after the merger than prior to the merger.

There is no assurance when or even if the merger will be completed. Failure to obtain required approvals necessary to satisfy closing conditions may delay or prevent completion of the merger.

Completion of the merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of a number of conditions, including the requisite approvals by the stockholders of PharmAthene and the stockholders of Theraclone. There can be no assurance that PharmAthene or Theraclone will be able to satisfy the closing conditions or that closing conditions beyond their control will be satisfied or waived.

Because the lack of a public market for Theraclone’s outstanding shares makes it difficult to evaluate the fairness of the merger, Theraclone stockholders may receive consideration in the merger that is greater than or less than the fair market value of the Theraclone shares.

The outstanding capital stock of Theraclone is privately held and is not traded in any public market. The lack of a public market makes it extremely difficult to determine the fair market value of Theraclone shares. Since the percentage of PharmAthene’s equity to be issued to Theraclone stockholders was determined based on negotiations between the parties, it is possible that the value of the PharmAthene common stock to be issued in connection with the merger will be greater than the fair market value of Theraclone shares. Alternatively, it is possible that the value of the shares of PharmAthene common stock to be issued in connection with the merger will be less than the fair market value of Theraclone shares.

35


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Because the merger will be completed after the date of the PharmAthene special meeting of stockholders and the Theraclone written consent of stockholders, at the time of the special meeting or written consent, you will not know the exact number of shares of PharmAthene common stock that the Theraclone stockholders will receive upon completion of the merger.

Subject to the terms of the Merger Agreement, at the Effective Time, each share of Theraclone common stock and preferred stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the merger will be canceled, extinguished and automatically converted into the right to receive that number of shares of PharmAthene common stock as determined pursuant to the Exchange Ratio. The Exchange Ratio depends on the fully diluted equity of both companies (but excluding options or warrants of PharmAthene with an exercise price of more than $2.50 per share). See the sections entitled “THE MERGER AGREEMENT — Merger Consideration.” Accordingly, the exact number of shares of PharmAthene common stock that Theraclone stockholders will receive upon completion of the merger will not be available at the time of the PharmAthene special meeting and the Theraclone written consent of stockholders.

PharmAthene and Theraclone officers and directors may have interests in the merger that are different from, or in addition to, those of PharmAthene stockholders and Theraclone stockholders generally.

The officers and directors of PharmAthene and Theraclone may have interests in the merger that are different from, or are in addition to, those of PharmAthene stockholders and Theraclone stockholders generally. The directors of the combined company will consist of five current directors from PharmAthene’s Board of Directors, three current directors from Theraclone’s Board of Directors, and one new director appointed by Theraclone. Current members of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors who resign upon the completion of the merger will receive director fees at current levels until the end of 2013, even though they may not remain on the combined company’s Board of Directors through that date. Theraclone’s executive officers will continue to serve as executive officers of the combined company. Further, certain PharmAthene executive officers will receive change in control payments in connection with the merger. In addition, the directors and executive officers of PharmAthene and Theraclone also have certain rights to indemnification and to directors’ and officers’ liability insurance that will be provided by the combined company following completion of the merger. See the sections entitled “THE MERGER — Interests of PharmAthene’s Executive Officers and Directors in the Merger” and “THE MERGER — Interests of Theraclone’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger.”

The announcement and pendency of the merger could have an adverse effect on the trading price of PharmAthene common stock and the business, financial condition, results of operations or business prospects for PharmAthene, Theraclone and the combined company.

While there have been no significant adverse effects to date, the announcement and pendency of the merger could disrupt PharmAthene’s and Theraclone’s businesses in the following ways, including:

third parties may seek to terminate or renegotiate their relationships with PharmAthene or Theraclone as a result of the merger, whether pursuant to the terms of their existing agreements with PharmAthene or Theraclone or otherwise; and
the attention of PharmAthene and Theraclone management may be directed toward completion of the merger and related matters and may be diverted from the day-to-day business operations of their respective companies, including from other opportunities that otherwise might be beneficial to PharmAthene and Theraclone.

Should they occur, any of these matters could adversely affect the trading price of PharmAthene common stock or harm the financial condition, results of operations or business prospects of PharmAthene, Theraclone and the combined company.

During the pendency of the merger, PharmAthene and Theraclone may be unable to enter into a business combination with another party because of restrictions in the Merger Agreement.

The Merger Agreement restricts the ability of PharmAthene and Theraclone to make acquisitions or complete other transactions during the pendency of the merger. While the Merger Agreement is in effect, subject to limited exceptions, each party is prohibited from soliciting, initiating, encouraging or taking actions

36


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

designed to facilitate any inquiries or the making of any proposal or offer that could lead to such party entering into certain extraordinary transactions with any third party, such as a sale of assets, an acquisition of equity interest, a tender offer for capital stock or a merger or other business combination outside the ordinary course of business. Any such transactions could be favorable to PharmAthene stockholders or Theraclone stockholders. See the sections entitled “THE MERGER AGREEMENT — No Solicitation,” “THE MERGER AGREEMENT — Stockholders Approval” and “THE MERGER AGREEMENT — Termination.”

In addition, certain of PharmAthene stockholders, who in the aggregate beneficially own approximately 7.5% of the outstanding shares of PharmAthene common stock, entered into the PharmAthene Voting Agreement, pursuant to which each stockholder agreed to, among other things, vote its shares of PharmAthene common stock in furtherance of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Certain of Theraclone’s stockholders, who in the aggregate held approximately 75% of the outstanding shares of Theraclone capital stock as of July 31, 2013, entered into the Theraclone Voting Agreement, pursuant to which each stockholder agreed to, among other things, vote its shares of Theraclone capital stock in favor of the approval and the adoption of the Merger Agreement and any actions required in furtherance thereof. See the section entitled “THE MERGER — Voting Agreement and Other Agreements.”

These provisions might discourage an otherwise interested third party from considering or proposing an acquisition of PharmAthene or Theraclone, even one that may be deemed of greater value than the merger to PharmAthene stockholders or Theraclone stockholders, as applicable.

The merger may be completed even though material adverse changes may result from the announcement of the merger, industry-wide changes or other causes.

In general, either party can refuse to complete the merger if there is a material adverse change affecting the other party between July 31, 2013, the date of the Merger Agreement, and the closing of the merger. However, some types of changes do not permit either party to refuse to complete the merger, even if such changes would have a material adverse effect on PharmAthene or Theraclone. If adverse changes occur but PharmAthene and Theraclone must still complete the merger, the combined company’s stock price may suffer.

The rights of Theraclone stockholders who become PharmAthene stockholders in the merger will be governed by PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws.

Theraclone stockholders who receive shares of PharmAthene common stock in the merger will become PharmAthene stockholders. As a result, Theraclone stockholders who become stockholders in PharmAthene will be governed by PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation and PharmAthene’s Bylaws, rather than being governed by Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation and Theraclone’s Bylaws. At the Effective Time, the outstanding shares of Theraclone capital stock will be converted into the right to receive shares of PharmAthene common stock. Theraclone preferred stock will in effect be exchanged for PharmAthene common stock so certain dividend, liquidation, redemption, voting, and protective rights held by holders of Theraclone’s preferred stock pursuant to Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation will no longer be applicable. For more information, please see the section entitled “COMPARISON OF RIGHTS OF STOCKHOLDERS.”

If the merger does not qualify as a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code or is otherwise taxable to U.S. holders of Theraclone common stock, then such holders may be required to pay substantial U.S. Federal income taxes.

As a condition to the completion of the merger, each of Fenwick & West LLP, tax counsel to Theraclone, and Dentons US LLP, tax counsel to PharmAthene, will have delivered an opinion, dated as of the closing date of the merger, that the merger will be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. These opinions will be based on certain assumptions and representations as to factual matters from Theraclone, PharmAthene and the Merger Sub, as well as certain covenants and undertakings by Theraclone, PharmAthene and the Merger Sub. If any of the assumptions, representations, covenants or undertakings is incorrect, incomplete, inaccurate or is violated in any material respect, the validity of the conclusions reached by counsel in their opinions would be jeopardized. Additionally, an opinion of counsel represents counsel’s best legal judgment but is not binding on the United States Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, or any court, so there can be no certainty that the IRS will not

37


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

challenge the conclusions reflected in the opinions or that a court will not sustain such a challenge. If the IRS or a court determines that the merger should not be treated as a reorganization, a holder of Theraclone common stock would recognize taxable gain or loss upon the exchange of Theraclone common stock for PharmAthene common stock pursuant to the merger. See the section entitled “THE MERGER — Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger.”

PharmAthene and Theraclone have incurred and will continue to incur significant transaction costs in connection with the merger. PharmAthene and Theraclone estimate that they will incur aggregate direct transaction costs of approximately $5.4 million associated with the merger, including costs incurred through August 30, 2013, and additional costs associated with the commencement of the combined company’s operation as a public company, which cannot be estimated accurately at this time. The costs associated with the merger may increase if any Theraclone stockholders elect to dissent from the merger and seek payment of the fair value of their shares as permitted by Delaware law. If the total costs of the merger exceed PharmAthene’s and Theraclone’s estimates, the ability of the combined company to achieve its business plan will be adversely affected.

The anticipated benefits of the merger may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer to realize than expected.

The merger involves the integration of two companies that have previously operated independently with principal offices in two distinct locations. Due to legal restrictions, PharmAthene and Theraclone are able to conduct only limited planning regarding the integration of the two companies prior to completion of the merger. Significant management attention and resources will be required to integrate the two companies. Delays in this process could adversely affect the combined company’s business, financial results, financial condition, and stock price following the merger. Even if the combined company were able to integrate the business operations successfully, there can be no assurance that this integration will result in the realization of the full benefits of synergies, innovation and operational efficiencies that may be possible from this integration and that these benefits will be achieved within a reasonable period of time.

Risks Related to the Combined Company Following the Merger

The trading price of the combined company’s common stock may be subject to significant fluctuations and volatility, and the stockholders of the combined company may be unable to resell their shares at a profit.

There has not been a public market for the combined company’s common stock. The market price of the combined company’s common stock could be subject to significant fluctuation following the merger. Market prices for securities of early-stage pharmaceutical, medical device, biotechnology and other life science companies have historically been particularly volatile. Some of the factors that may cause the market price of the combined company’s common stock to fluctuate include:

its ability to develop, obtain regulatory clearances or approvals for and market new and enhanced products on a timely basis;
developments in PharmAthene’s ongoing legal action against SIGA;
changes in governmental regulations or in the status of its regulatory approvals, clearances or future applications;
its announcements or its competitors’ announcements regarding new products, product enhancements, significant contracts, acquisitions or strategic investments;
quarterly variation in the combined company’s or its competitors’ results of operations;
changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by securities analysts, if any, who cover the combined company’s stock;
failure to meet estimates or recommendation by securities analysts, if any, who cover the combined company’s stock;

38


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

changes in healthcare policy, changes in the government’s emphasis on combating bioterrorism or other changes that will make it more challenging for the combined company to receive government funding;
product liability claims or other litigation involving the combined company;
accusations that the combined company has violated a law or regulation;
sales of large blocks of the combined company’s common stock, including sales by the combined company’s executive officers, directors and significant stockholders;
disputes or other developments with respect to intellectual property rights;
changes in accounting principles; and
general market conditions and other factors, including factors unrelated to the combined company’s operating performance or the operating performance of its competitors.

In addition, if securities class action litigation is initiated against the combined company, it would incur substantial costs and its management’s attention would be diverted from operations. All of these factors could cause the price of the combined company’s common stock to decline, and you may lose some or all of your investment.

Moreover, the stock markets in general have experienced substantial volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of individual companies. These broad market fluctuations may also adversely affect the trading price of the combined company’s common stock.

Future results of the combined company may differ materially from the unaudited pro forma financial statements presented in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation.

The future results of the combined company may be materially different from those shown in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements presented in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation, which show only a combination of the historical results of PharmAthene and Theraclone. PharmAthene and Theraclone expect to incur significant costs associated with completion of the merger and combining the operations of the two companies. Furthermore, these costs may decrease the capital that the combined company could use for continued development of the combined company’s business in the future or may cause the combined company to seek to raise new capital sooner than expected.

The combined company plans to issue additional equity securities in the future, which may result in dilution to existing investors.

To the extent the combined company raises additional capital by issuing equity securities, including in a debt financing where the combined company issues convertible notes or notes with warrants, the combined company’s stockholders may experience substantial dilution. The combined company may, from time to time, sell common stock in one or more transactions at prices and in a manner it determines. If the combined company sells common stock, existing stockholders may be materially diluted. In addition, new investors could gain rights superior to existing stockholders, such as liquidation and other preferences. In addition, the number of shares available for future grant under PharmAthene’s equity compensation plans may be increased in the future. In addition, the combined company will also have warrants outstanding to purchase shares of capital stock. The combined company’s stockholders will incur dilution upon exercise of any outstanding stock options or warrants.

All of PharmAthene’s outstanding shares of common stock are, and any shares that are issued in the merger will be, freely tradable without restrictions or further registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, except for any shares subject to stockholder agreements with lock-up provisions executed in connection with the merger and any shares held by affiliates, as defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. Rule 144 defines an affiliate as a person who directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, the combined company and would include persons such as the combined company’s directors and executive officers.

39


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The concentration of the capital stock ownership with insiders of the combined company will likely limit the ability of the stockholders of the combined company to influence corporate matters.

Following the merger, the executive officers, directors, five percent or greater stockholders, and their respective affiliated entities of the combined company will in the aggregate beneficially own approximately 48.1% of the combined company’s outstanding common stock. As a result, these stockholders, acting together, have control over most matters that require approval by the combined company’s stockholders, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. Corporate actions might be taken even if other stockholders oppose them. This concentration of ownership might also have the effect of delaying or preventing a corporate transaction that other stockholders may view as beneficial.

If securities analysts do not publish research or reports about the business of the combined company, or if they publish negative evaluations, the price of the combined company’s common stock could decline.

The trading market for the combined company’s common stock will rely in part on the availability of research and reports that third-party industry or financial analysts publish about the combined company. There are many large, publicly traded companies active in the biopharmaceutical industry, which may mean it will be less likely that the combined company receives widespread analyst coverage. Furthermore, if one or more of the analysts who do cover the combined company downgrade its stock, its stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of the combined company, the combined company could lose visibility in the market, which in turn could cause its stock price to decline.

Anti-takeover provisions under Delaware law could make an acquisition of the combined company, which may be beneficial to the stockholders of the combined company, more difficult and may prevent attempts by the stockholders to replace or remove management.

The combined company will be subject to the Delaware laws regulating corporate takeovers, which, with limited exceptions, prohibit a “target corporation” from engaging in certain “significant business transactions” for a period of five years after the share acquisition by an acquiring person, unless (i) the prohibited transaction or the acquiring person’s purchase of shares was approved by a majority of the members of the target corporation’s Board of Directors prior to the acquiring person’s share acquisition or (ii) the prohibited transaction was both approved by the majority of the members of the target corporation’s board and authorized at a stockholder meeting by at least two-thirds of the outstanding voting shares (excluding the acquiring person’s shares) at or subsequent to the acquiring person’s share acquisition. An “acquiring person” is defined as a person or group of persons that beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting securities of the target corporation. Such prohibited transactions include, among other things:

certain mergers or consolidations with, dispositions of assets to, or issuances of stock to or redemptions of stock from, the acquiring person;
termination of 5% or more of the employees of the target corporation as a result of the acquiring person’s acquisition of 10% or more of the shares;
allowing the acquiring person to receive any disproportionate benefit as a stockholder; and
liquidating or dissolving the target corporation.

After the five-year period, certain “significant business transactions” are permitted, as long as they comply with certain “fair price” provisions of the Delaware statute or are approved by a majority of the outstanding shares other than those of which the acquiring person has beneficial ownership. A corporation may not “opt out” of this statute.

As such, these laws could prohibit or delay mergers or a change in control and may discourage attempts by other companies to acquire the combined company.

In addition, following the merger, the combined company’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws contain provisions, such as undesignated preferred stock, that could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire the combined company without the consent of its Board of Directors. Further, the combined company’s Bylaws require advance notice of stockholder proposals and nominations and impose restrictions

40


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

on the persons who may call special stockholder meetings. These provisions may have the effect of preventing or hindering any attempts by the stockholders of the combined company to replace its Board of Directors or management.

In the event that the combined company fails to satisfy any of the listing requirements of the NYSE MKT, its common stock may be delisted, which could affect its market price and liquidity.

Following the Merger, the combined company’s common stock is expected to be listed on the NYSE MKT. For continued listing on the NYSE MKT, the combined company will be required to comply with the listing requirements, including the minimum market capitalization standard set forth in applicable NYSE MKT rules, the requirement that the combined company’s shares not trade “for a substantial period of time at a low price per share” or that the combined company not dispose of its principal operating assets or discontinue a substantial portion of the combined company’s operations, among other requirements. In the event that the combined company fails to satisfy any of the listing requirements of the NYSE MKT, its common stock may be delisted. If the combined company is unable to list on the NYSE MKT, it would likely be more difficult to trade in or obtain accurate quotations as to the market price of the combined company’s common stock. If the combined company’s securities are delisted from trading on the NYSE MKT and the combined company is not able to list its securities on another exchange or to have them quoted on NASDAQ, the combined company’s securities could be quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board or on the “pink sheets.” As a result, the combined company could face significant adverse consequences including:

a limited availability of market quotations for its securities;
a determination that its common stock is a “penny stock” which will require brokers trading in its common stock to adhere to more stringent rules and possibly result in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market for its securities;
a limited amount of news and analyst coverage for the combined company; and
a decreased ability to issue additional securities (including pursuant to short-form registration statements on Form S-3 or obtain additional financing in the future).

Risks Related to PharmAthene

You should consider the following factors in evaluating whether to approve the proposals described in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation. These factors should be considered in conjunction with the other information included by PharmAthene and Theraclone in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation. The risk factors relating to PharmAthene will also apply to the combined company going forward because a substantial portion of the business of the combined company will be PharmAthene’s business. For purposes of this section, “Risks Related to PharmAthene,” references to PharmAthene refer to PharmAthene, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries PharmAthene Canada, Inc. and PharmAthene UK Limited.

Risks Related to PharmAthene’s Financial Condition.

PharmAthene has a history of losses and negative cash flow, anticipate future losses and negative cash flow, and cannot provide assurances that PharmAthene will achieve profitability.

PharmAthene has incurred significant losses since PharmAthene commenced operations. As of December 31, 2012, PharmAthene had accumulated losses of $198.6 million since its inception, and had net losses of approximately $4.9 million, $3.8 million, and $34.8 million during the last three years, respectively. PharmAthene’s losses to date have resulted principally from research and development costs related to the development of PharmAthene’s product candidates and general and administrative costs related to operations. Currently PharmAthene’s development efforts are primarily focused on one product candidate, SparVax®. At June 30, 2013, PharmAthene had cash on hand of approximately $15.8 million.

PharmAthene expects that it will incur substantial losses for the foreseeable future as a result of increases in PharmAthene’s research and development costs, including costs associated with conducting preclinical testing, clinical trials and regulatory compliance activities. If PharmAthene continues to incur losses and is not

41


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

able to raise adequate funds to cover those losses, PharmAthene may be required to curtail significantly PharmAthene’s development and commercialization activities. This would have a material adverse effect on PharmAthene’s business, financial condition and/or results of operations.

PharmAthene’s likelihood for achieving profitability will depend on numerous factors, including success in:

completing the merger;
obtaining a ruling from the Delaware Court of Chancery that provides for a remedy in PharmAthene’s on-going litigation with SIGA;
the timing, amount and profitability of sales of ArestvyrTM (including the timing of SIGA’s recognition of revenue related thereto) if any final ruling from the Delaware Court of Chancery provides as a remedy for a cash flow to PharmAthene related to sales or profits of ArestvyrTM;
developing PharmAthene’s existing products and developing and testing new product candidates;
continuing to receive government funding and identifying new government funding opportunities;
receiving regulatory approvals;
carrying out PharmAthene’s intellectual property strategy;
establishing PharmAthene’s competitive position;
pursuing third-party collaborations;
acquiring or in-licensing products; and
manufacturing and marketing products.

Many of these factors will depend on circumstances beyond PharmAthene’s control. PharmAthene cannot guarantee that it will achieve sufficient revenues for profitability. Even if PharmAthene does achieve profitability, it cannot guarantee that PharmAthene can sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis in the future. If revenues grow more slowly than PharmAthene anticipates, or if operating expenses exceed PharmAthene’s expectations or cannot be adjusted accordingly, then PharmAthene’s business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows will be materially and adversely affected. Because PharmAthene’s strategy includes potential acquisitions of other businesses, acquisition expenses and any cash used to make these acquisitions will reduce PharmAthene’s available cash.

Under the terms of PharmAthene’s agreements with Avecia, PharmAthene is required to pay Avecia (now a subsidiary of FUJIfilm) $5 million within 90 days of entering into a multi-year funded development contract that was to be issued by BARDA under solicitation number RFP-BARDA-08-15 (or any substitution or replacement thereof) for the further development of SparVax®. RFP-BARDA-08-15 was cancelled by BARDA in December 2009. PharmAthene has received funds from BARDA and other U.S. government agencies under various development agreements between PharmAthene and BARDA. Any development contract deemed to be a substitute or replacement of RFP-BARDA-08-15 could trigger PharmAthene’s obligation to make the $5 million payment.

Global economic uncertainty continues to make capital markets more volatile and is threatening to once again tighten the credit markets. As a result, there can be no assurances that PharmAthene would be successful in obtaining sufficient financing on commercially reasonable terms or at all. PharmAthene’s requirements for additional capital may be substantial and will be dependent on many factors, including the success of PharmAthene’s research and development efforts, PharmAthene’s ability to commercialize and market products, PharmAthene’s ability to successfully pursue PharmAthene’s licensing and collaboration strategy, the receipt of continued government funding, competing technological and marketing developments, costs associated with the protection of PharmAthene’s intellectual property and any future change in PharmAthene’s business strategy.

To the extent that PharmAthene raises additional capital through the sale of securities, the issuance of those securities or shares underlying such securities would result in dilution that could be substantial to

42


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PharmAthene’s stockholders. In addition, if it incurs additional debt financing, a substantial portion of PharmAthene’s operating cash flow may be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on such indebtedness, thus limiting funds available for PharmAthene’s business activities.

If adequate funds are not available, PharmAthene may be required to curtail significantly PharmAthene’s development and commercialization activities. This would have a material adverse effect on PharmAthene’s business, financial condition and/or results of operations.

As a result of the ruling of the Delaware Supreme Court PharmAthene no longer have a financial interest in ArestvyrTM and there can be no assurance that the Delaware Chancery Court will issue a remedy that provides PharmAthene with a financial interest in that product or another remedy.

In its May 2013 decision, the Delaware Supreme Court reversed the remedy ordered by the Delaware Court of Chancery and remanded the issue of a remedy back to the trial court for reconsideration in light of the Delaware Supreme Court’s opinion. There can be no assurance that the Delaware Court of Chancery Court will issue a remedy that provides PharmAthene with a financial interest in ArestvyrTM and related products, that SIGA will not appeal any subsequent decision by the Delaware Court of Chancery, or that SIGA will not be successful in any subsequent appeal. Even if the Delaware Court of Chancery does provide PharmAthene with a remedy that provides PharmAthene with a financial interest in ArestvyrTM, PharmAthene may never receive any proceeds from SIGA’s future sales of that product.

In addition to the risks that ordinarily accompany the development and commercialization of biodefense products, including with respect to government contracting activities (including protests filed by third parties), competition (which with respect to ArestvyrTM includes potential competing products being developed by Chimerix, Inc.), FDA and other regulatory approval and commercialization efforts, which are described elsewhere in PharmAthene’s risk factors, any interest PharmAthene may have in future sales of SIGA’s product ArestvyrTM and related products is subject to additional risks.

In particular, SIGA’s ability to deliver product to the SNS (and potential foreign government purchasers), and the timing and profitability thereof (including the timing of SIGA’s recognition of revenue related thereto), are subject to a number of significant risks and uncertainties (certain of which are outlined in SIGA’s filings with the SEC) as to which PharmAthene has limited knowledge and no ability to control, mitigate or fully evaluate. PharmAthene has no first-hand knowledge of, and SIGA has not publicly disclosed, any information related to the potential margins or profitability of ArestvyrTM and related products.

Risks Related to Product Development and Commercialization

PharmAthene has not commercialized any products or recognized any revenues from sales. All of PharmAthene’s product candidates are still under development, and there can be no assurance of successful commercialization of any of PharmAthene’s products.

PharmAthene has not commercialized any product candidates or recognized any revenues from product sales. In general, PharmAthene’s research and development programs are in development stages. There can be no assurances that one or more of PharmAthene’s future product candidates will not fail to meet safety and efficacy standards in human testing, even if those product candidates are found to be effective in animal studies. To develop and commercialize biodefense treatment and prophylactic product candidates, PharmAthene must provide the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities with human clinical and non-clinical animal data that demonstrate adequate safety and effectiveness. To generate these data, PharmAthene will have to subject PharmAthene’s product candidates to significant additional research and development efforts, including extensive non-clinical studies and clinical testing. It cannot be sure that PharmAthene’s approach to drug discovery will be effective or will result in the development of any drug. Currently PharmAthene’s development efforts are primarily focused on one product candidate, SparVax®. Even if PharmAthene’s product candidates are successful when tested in animals, such success would not be a guarantee of the safety or effectiveness of such product candidates in humans.

While PharmAthene plans to commence a planned Phase II human clinical trial with SparVax® in the fourth quarter 2013, final timing is subject to obtaining funding and consent from BARDA.

43


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Research and development efforts are time-consuming and subject to delays. Even if PharmAthene initially receives positive early-stage preclinical or clinical results, such results may not be indicative of results that could be anticipated in the later stages of drug development. Delays in obtaining results in PharmAthene’s non-clinical studies and clinical testing can occur for a variety of reasons, such as slower than anticipated enrollment by volunteers in the trials, adverse events related to the products, failure to comply with Good Clinical Practices, unforeseen safety issues, unsatisfactory results in trials, perceived defects in the design of clinical trials, changes in regulatory policy as well as for reasons detailed in the section entitled “— Necessary Reliance on the Animal Rule in Conducting Trials is Time-Consuming and Expensive.”

Any delay or adverse clinical event arising during any of PharmAthene’s clinical trials could force PharmAthene to conduct additional clinical trials in order to obtain approval from the FDA and other regulatory bodies. PharmAthene’s development costs will increase substantially if PharmAthene experiences material delays in any clinical trials or if it needs to conduct more or larger trials than planned.

If delays are significant, or if any of PharmAthene’s product candidates do not prove to be safe, pure, and potent (including efficacy) or do not receive required regulatory approvals, PharmAthene may have to abandon the product candidate altogether and will be unable to recognize revenues from the sale of that product. In addition, PharmAthene’s collaborative partners may not be able to conduct clinical testing or obtain necessary approvals from the FDA or other regulatory authorities for any product candidates jointly developed by PharmAthene and PharmAthene’s partners. If PharmAthene fails to obtain required governmental approvals, PharmAthene and PharmAthene’s collaborative partners will experience delays in, or be precluded from, marketing products developed through them or, as applicable, their research.

If PharmAthene cannot maintain successful licensing arrangements and collaborations, enter into new licensing arrangements and collaborations, or effectively accomplish strategic acquisitions, PharmAthene’s ability to develop and commercialize a diverse product portfolio could be limited and PharmAthene’s ability to compete may be harmed.

A key component of PharmAthene’s business strategy is the in-licensing of compounds and products developed by other pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies or academic research laboratories. In addition, PharmAthene has entered into licensing and research and development agreements with a number of other parties and collaborators. There can be no assurances that the research and development conducted pursuant to these agreements will result in revenue generating product candidates. If PharmAthene’s suppliers, vendors, licensors, or other collaboration partners experience financial difficulties as a result of the weak economy, change in strategic direction (like the decision of PharmAthene’s main CRO vendor on PharmAthene’s rBChE program to cease its research and development operations, which caused PharmAthene to locate a replacement vendor on an expedited basis), or if they are acquired as part of the current wave of consolidations in the pharmaceutical industry (such as, for example, with the acquisitions of Medarex by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Diosynth Biotechnologies, Inc.’s parent company by Merck & Co., Inc. in 2009 and of Avecia’s CMO subsidiary (Avecia Biologics) by Merck in 2010 and the subsequent acquisition of these two entities by FUJIfilm in 2011), their priorities or PharmAthene’s working relationship with them might change. As a result, they might shift resources away from the research, development and/or manufacturing efforts intended to benefit PharmAthene’s products, which could lead to significant delays in PharmAthene’s development programs and potential future sales. PharmAthene’s current licensing, research and development, and supply agreements may expire and may not be renewable or could be terminated if PharmAthene does not meet PharmAthene’s obligations.

If PharmAthene is not able to identify new licensing opportunities or enter into other licensing arrangements on acceptable terms, PharmAthene may be unable to develop a diverse portfolio of products. For PharmAthene’s future collaboration efforts to be successful, it must first identify partners whose capabilities complement and integrate well with PharmAthene. PharmAthene faces, and will continue to face, significant competition in seeking appropriate collaborators. Collaboration arrangements are complex and time consuming to negotiate, document and implement. PharmAthene may not be successful in its efforts to establish and implement collaborations or other similar arrangements. The terms of any collaboration or other arrangements that PharmAthene establishes may not be favorable to it. Furthermore, technologies to which it gains access

44


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

may prove ineffective, become obsolete, or unsafe or PharmAthene’s partners may prove difficult to work with or less skilled than PharmAthene originally expected. In addition, any past collaborative successes are no indication of potential future success.

Necessary Reliance on the Animal Rule in Conducting Trials is Time-Consuming and Expensive.

As further described below under the section entitled “PHARMATHENE’S BUSINESS — Business Concept and Strategy”, to obtain FDA approval for PharmAthene’s biological warfare defense products under current FDA regulations, PharmAthene is required to utilize animal model studies for efficacy and provide animal and human safety data under the Animal Rule. For many of the biological and chemical threats, animal models are not yet available, and as such PharmAthene is developing, or will have to develop, appropriate animal models, which is a time-consuming and expensive research effort. Further, PharmAthene may not be able to sufficiently demonstrate the animal correlation to the satisfaction of the FDA, as these corollaries are difficult to establish and are often unclear. The FDA may decide that PharmAthene’s data are insufficient for approval and require additional non-clinical, clinical or other studies, refuse to approve PharmAthene’s products, or place restrictions on PharmAthene’s ability to commercialize those products. Further, other countries have not, at this time, established criteria for review and approval of these types of products outside their normal review process; i.e., there is no Animal Rule equivalent, and consequently there can be no assurance that PharmAthene will be able to make a submission for marketing approval in foreign countries based on such animal data.

Additionally, few facilities in the United States and internationally have the capability to test animals with anthrax, nerve agents, or other lethal biotoxins or chemical agents or otherwise assist PharmAthene in qualifying the requisite animal models. PharmAthene has to compete with other biodefense companies for access to this limited pool of highly specialized resources. PharmAthene therefore may not be able to secure contracts to conduct the testing in a predictable timeframe or at all.

Even if it succeeds in commercializing PharmAthene’s product candidates, they may not become profitable and manufacturing problems or side effects discovered at later stages can further increase costs of commercialization.

PharmAthene cannot assure you that any drugs resulting from its research and development efforts will become commercially available. Even if PharmAthene succeeds in developing and commercializing its product candidates, they may never generate sufficient or sustainable revenues to enable PharmAthene to be profitable. Even if effective, a product that reaches market may be subject to additional clinical trials, changes to or re-approvals of PharmAthene’s manufacturing facilities or a change in labeling if PharmAthene or others identify side effects or manufacturing problems after a product is on the market. This could harm sales of the affected products and could increase the cost and expenses of commercializing and marketing them. It could also lead to the suspension or revocation of regulatory approval for the products.

PharmAthene and PharmAthene’s CMOs will also be required to comply with the applicable FDA current Good Manufacturing Practice, or cGMP, regulations. These regulations include requirements relating to quality control and quality assurance as well as the corresponding maintenance of records and documentation. Manufacturing facilities are subject to inspection by the FDA. These facilities must be approved to supply licensed products to the commercial marketplace. PharmAthene and its contract manufacturers may not be able to comply with the applicable cGMP requirements and other FDA regulatory requirements. Should PharmAthene or its contract manufacturers fail to comply, it could be subject to fines or other sanctions or could be precluded from marketing PharmAthene’s products.

PharmAthene may become subject to product liability claims, which could reduce demand for its product candidates or result in damages that exceed its insurance coverage.

PharmAthene faces an inherent risk of exposure to product liability suits in connection with its product candidates being tested in clinical trials or sold commercially. PharmAthene may become subject to a product liability suit if any product it develops causes injury, or if treated individuals subsequently become infected or suffer adverse effects from PharmAthene’s products. Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, product liability claims may result in decreased demand for a product, injury to PharmAthene’s reputation, withdrawal of clinical trial volunteers, and loss of revenues.

45


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In addition, if a product liability claim is brought against PharmAthene, the cost of defending the claim could be significant and any adverse determination may result in liabilities in excess of PharmAthene’s insurance coverage. Although PharmAthene’s anthrax countermeasures are covered under the general immunity provisions of the U.S. Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, or the Public Readiness Act, there can be no assurance that the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services will make other declarations in the future that cover any of its other product candidates or that the U.S. Congress will not act in the future to reduce coverage under the Public Readiness Act or to repeal it altogether. For further discussion of that act, see “— Legislation limiting or restricting liability for medical products used to fight bioterrorism is new, and PharmAthene cannot be certain that any such protection will apply to its products or if applied what the scope of any such coverage will be.” Additionally, PharmAthene is considering applying for indemnification under the U.S. Support Anti-terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies (SAFETY) Act of 2002 which preempts and modifies tort laws so as to limit the claims and damages potentially faced by companies who provide certain “qualified” anti-terrorism products. However, PharmAthene cannot be certain that it will be able to obtain or maintain coverage under the SAFETY Act or adequate insurance coverage on acceptable terms, if at all.

If PharmAthene cannot effectively accomplish strategic acquisitions, generally, its ability to develop and commercialize a diverse product portfolio could be limited and its ability to compete may be harmed.

PharmAthene may pursue other strategic acquisitions to further its development and commercialization efforts, which could result in its incurring significant out of pocket costs as well as expending management time and those of other employees. To achieve the anticipated benefits of an acquisition, PharmAthene must integrate the acquired company’s business, technology and employees in an efficient and effective manner. The successful combination of companies in a rapidly changing biodefense industry is generally more difficult to accomplish than in other industries. As with the proposed merger, the combination of two companies requires, among other things, integration of the companies’ respective technologies and research and development efforts. PharmAthene cannot assure you that any integration will be accomplished smoothly or successfully. The difficulties of integration are increased by the need to coordinate geographically separated organizations and address possible differences in corporate cultures and management philosophies. The integration of operations and systems will require the dedication of management resources that may temporarily distract attention from the day-to-day operations of the combined companies. The business of the combined companies may also be disrupted by employee retention uncertainty and lack of focus during integration. The inability of management to integrate successfully the operations of the two companies, in particular, to integrate and retain key scientific personnel, or the inability to successfully integrate technology platforms, could have a material adverse effect on PharmAthene’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Risks Related to Its Dependence on U.S. Government Contracts

All of PharmAthene’s immediately foreseeable future revenues are contingent upon grants and contracts from the U.S. government and it may not achieve sufficient revenues from these agreements to attain profitability.

For the foreseeable future, PharmAthene believes its main customer will be national governments, primarily the U.S. government. Substantially all of PharmAthene’s revenues to date have been derived from grants and U.S. government contracts. There can be no assurances that existing government contracts will be renewed or that it can enter into new contracts or receive new grants to supply the United States or other governments with PharmAthene’s products. The process of obtaining government contracts is lengthy and uncertain.

If the U.S. government makes significant contract awards to PharmAthene’s competitors, rather than to PharmAthene, for the supply to the U.S. emergency stockpile, PharmAthene’s business will be harmed and it is unlikely that it will ultimately be able to supply that particular treatment or product to foreign governments or other third parties. Further, changes in government budgets and agendas, funding strategies, cost overruns in PharmAthene’s programs, or advances by its competitors, may result in changes in the timing of funding for, a decreased and de-prioritized emphasis on, or termination of, government contracts that support the development and/or procurement of the biodefense products PharmAthene is developing. For example, while

46


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

RFP-BARDA-08-15 for an rPA-based anthrax vaccine for the SNS initially indicated that the government would make an award by September 26, 2008, the award was delayed multiple times and ultimately canceled in December 2009.

Funding is subject to Congressional appropriations generally made on an annual basis even for multi-year contracts. More generally, due to the ongoing economic uncertainty, the U.S. government may reduce or delay spending in the biodefense field or eliminate funding of certain programs altogether, which could decrease the likelihood of future government contract awards or that the government would procure products from PharmAthene. Future funding levels for two of PharmAthene’s key government customers, BARDA and DoD, for the advanced development and procurement of medical countermeasures are uncertain, and may be subject to budget cuts as the U.S. Congress and the President look to reduce the nation’s budget deficit.

For example, due to DoD budget constraints and concerns about potential duration of protection with the current route of Protexia® administration, the DoD did not extend PharmAthene’s September 2006 contract for Protexia®, which contract expired on December 31, 2010. As a result of DoD’s decision not to continue funding Protexia® development, it closed down its Protexia®-related operations. PharmAthene incurred wind-down costs in the fourth quarter of 2010 and approximately $0.5 million in 2011, for which it did not get reimbursed by the government. PharmAthene also wrote down the net book value of its Protexia® -related assets recognizing approximately $4.6 million of impairment charges for the year ended December 31, 2010.

The U.S. government deficit and budget crisis has created increasing pressure to reduce government spending. In August 2011, President Obama signed into law the Budget Control Act of 2011, or the Budget Control Act, which increased the U.S. government’s debt ceiling and enacted 10-year discretionary spending caps expected to generate substantial savings for the U.S. government. The Budget Control Act also established a joint bipartisan committee of Congress responsible for identifying at least $1.2 trillion in additional savings by November 2011. The joint committee did not meet the deadline for proposing recommended legislation and Congress missed a related deadline in January 2013. Under the Budget Control Act, additional automatic spending cuts, referred to as sequestration totaling $1.2 trillion (subsequently adjusted downward to approximately $1.0 trillion) over nine years would be triggered. These discretionary spending cuts are expected to be evenly split between defense and non-defense areas.

On March 1, 2013, the sequestration became effective and the law required the President to issue a sequestration order cancelling $85 billion in budgetary resources across the federal government for the government fiscal year, which ends on September 30, 2013. The Office of Management and Budget calculated that, over the course of the government fiscal year, the sequestration required a 7.8 percent reduction in non-exempt defense discretionary spending and a 5.0 percent reduction in non-exempt nondefense discretionary spending. The sequestration also required reductions of 2.0 percent to Medicare, 5.1 percent to other non-exempt nondefense mandatory programs, and 7.9 percent to non-exempt defense mandatory programs. Because these cuts had to be achieved over only 7 months instead of 12, the effective percentage reductions were approximately 13 percent for non-exempt defense programs and 9 percent for non-exempt nondefense programs.

As of December 31, 2012, of the total $5.6 billion allotted under Project BioShield in 2004, over $2.6 billion in procurement contracts had been awarded and approximately $2.3 billion had been transferred out of the Project BioShield Special Reserve fund, or SRF, for non-procurement related activities. Remaining funds in the SRF were approximately $500 million as of December 31, 2012. It is expected that BARDA will obligate these remaining funds by the end of the fiscal year 2013 (September 30, 2013). Currently, the government is operating under a continuing resolution at the fiscal year 2012 level. As $415 million was the level of annual funding for BARDA operations in fiscal year 2012, that amount is being transferred from the SRF to cover fiscal year 2013 operating expenses, and thus will not be available for product purchases for the U.S. Strategic National Stockpile. Congress has yet to reach agreement on a budget for fiscal year 2014. Consequently, the amount and nature of future federal budget spending is uncertain. Potential reductions in funding could severely limit PharmAthene’s ability to maintain, renew or enter into new contracts and therefore materially adversely impact PharmAthene’s business.

PharmAthene’s current development contract for Valortim® with NIAID expired January 31, 2012. There can be no assurance it will be successful in obtaining additional financial support for this program.

47


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

U.S. government agencies have special contracting requirements that give them the ability to unilaterally control PharmAthene’s contracts.

U.S. government contracts typically contain unilateral termination provisions for the government and are subject to audit and modification by the government at its sole discretion, which will subject PharmAthene to additional risks. These risks include the ability of the U.S. government unilaterally to:

suspend or prevent PharmAthene for a set period of time from receiving new contracts or extending existing contracts based on violations or suspected violations of laws or regulations;
terminate PharmAthene’s contracts, including for poor performance or if funds become unavailable or are not provided to the applicable governmental agency;
reduce the scope and value of PharmAthene’s contracts and/or revise the timing for work to be performed;
audit and object to PharmAthene’s contract-related costs and fees, including allocated indirect costs;
control and potentially prohibit the export of PharmAthene’s products;
claim rights to products, including intellectual property, developed under the contract;
change certain terms and conditions in PharmAthene’s contracts; and
cancel outstanding RFP solicitations (as was the case with RFP-BARDA-08-15) or BAAs.

The U.S. government will be able to terminate any of its contracts with PharmAthene either for its convenience or if PharmAthene defaults by failing to perform in accordance with the contract schedule and terms. Termination-for-convenience provisions generally enable PharmAthene to recover only its costs incurred or committed, settlement expenses, and profit on the work completed prior to termination. Termination-for-default provisions do not permit these recoveries and would make PharmAthene liable for excess costs incurred by the U.S. government in procuring undelivered items from another source.

The U.S. government may reduce or delay spending in the biodefense field or eliminate funding of certain programs altogether, which could decrease the likelihood of future government contract awards, the likelihood that the government will exercise its right to extend any of its existing contracts with PharmAthene and/or the likelihood that the government would procure products from PharmAthene.

The U.S. government’s determination to award any contracts may be challenged by an interested party, such as another bidder, at the GAO or in federal court. If such a challenge is successful, a contract award may be re-evaluated and terminated.

The laws and regulations governing the procurement of goods and services by the U.S. government provide procedures by which other bidders and other interested parties may challenge the award of a government contract. If PharmAthene is awarded a government contract, such challenges or protests could be filed even if there are not any valid legal grounds on which to base the protest. If any such protests are filed, the government agency may decide, and in certain circumstances will be statutorily required, to suspend PharmAthene’s performance under the contract while such protests are being considered by the GAO or the applicable federal court, thus potentially delaying delivery of goods and services and payment. In addition, PharmAthene could be forced to expend considerable funds to defend any potential award. If a protest is successful, the government may be ordered to terminate PharmAthene’s contract and re-evaluate bids. The government could even be directed to award a potential contract to one of the other bidders.

For example, in March 2010, a third-party filed a bid protest with the GAO challenging the February 2010 decision of the DHHS to modify its existing research and development contract with PharmAthene for the development of SparVax®. In March 2010 DHHS suspended performance under the modification pursuant to the automatic stay provisions of the FAR, pending a decision by the GAO on the protest. While the bid protest was ultimately denied, and the related DHHS “stop work” order canceled in June 2010, the protest contributed to a reduction in revenues and cash and cash equivalents over the period that work could not be performed under the modification. In addition, PharmAthene incurred unexpected general and administrative expenses to intervene in the protest. In October 2010 a losing bidder filed a successful protest with the small

48


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

business administration claiming that SIGA did not qualify as a small business entitled to a contract award under RFP-BARDA-09-35 for a smallpox antiviral. When the government subsequently issued a contract to SIGA in May 2011 without the small business requirement, this same losing bidder filed a second protest, this time with the GAO. While this protest was withdrawn, in exchange for dropping the protest, the government agreed to remove an option from the contract permitting the government to purchase up to 12 million additional courses of therapy of ArestvyrTM beyond the base purchase of 1.7 million courses of therapy.

PharmAthene’s business is subject to audit by the U.S. government, and a negative audit could adversely affect PharmAthene’s business.

U.S. government agencies such as the Defense Contract Audit Agency, or the DCAA, routinely audit and investigate government contractors. These agencies review a contractor’s performance under its contracts, cost structure and compliance with applicable laws, regulations and standards.

The DCAA also reviews the adequacy of, and a contractor’s compliance with, its internal control systems and policies, including the contractor’s purchasing, property, estimating, compensation and management information systems. Any costs found to be improperly allocated to a specific contract will not be reimbursed, while such costs already reimbursed must be refunded. If an audit uncovers improper or illegal activities, PharmAthene may be subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including:

termination of contracts;
forfeiture of profits;
suspension of payments;
fines; and
suspension or prohibition from conducting business with the U.S. government.

In addition, PharmAthene could suffer serious reputational harm if allegations of impropriety were made against it.

Laws and regulations affecting government contracts make it more costly and difficult for PharmAthene to successfully conduct its business.

PharmAthene must comply with numerous laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration and performance of government contracts, which can make it more difficult for PharmAthene to retain its rights under these contracts. These laws and regulations affect how it conducts business with government agencies. Among the most significant government contracting regulations that affect PharmAthene’s business are:

the Federal Acquisition Regulation, or FAR, and agency-specific regulations supplemental to the Federal Acquisition Regulation, which comprehensively regulate the procurement, formation, administration and performance of government contracts;
the business ethics and public integrity obligations, which govern conflicts of interest and the hiring of former government employees, restrict the granting of gratuities and funding of lobbying activities and incorporate other requirements such as the Anti-Kickback Act, the Procurement Integrity Act, the False Claims Act and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act;
export and import control laws and regulations; and
laws, regulations and executive orders restricting the use and dissemination of information classified for national security purposes and the exportation of certain products and technical data.

Foreign governments typically also have laws and regulations governing contracts with their respective agencies. These foreign laws and regulations affect how PharmAthene and PharmAthene’s customers conduct business and, in some instances, impose added costs on PharmAthene’s business. Any changes in applicable laws and regulations could restrict PharmAthene’s ability to maintain its existing contracts and obtain new contracts, which could limit PharmAthene’s ability to conduct PharmAthene’s business and materially adversely affect PharmAthene’s revenues and results of operations.

49


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Risks Related to Dependence on or Competition From Third Parties

The amount of revenue, if any, PharmAthene realizes from its profit split interest in ArestvyrTM and related products is among other things, dependent on SIGA’s ability to finish development and deliver ArestvyrTM and related products to the U.S. and foreign governments.

SIGA’s ability to deliver product to the SNS (and potential foreign government purchasers), and the timing and profitability thereof (including the timing of SIGA’s recognition of revenue related thereto), is subject to a number of significant risks and uncertainties (certain of which are outlined in SIGA’s filings with the SEC) as to which it has limited knowledge and no ability to control, mitigate or fully evaluate along with many of the risks related to drug development and commercialization set forth elsewhere in this “Risk Factors” Section. PharmAthene has no first-hand knowledge of, and SIGA has not publicly disclosed, any information related to the potential margins or profitability of ArestvyrTM and related products.

Because PharmAthene depends on clinical research centers and other contractors for clinical and non-clinical testing, including testing under the Animal Rule, and for certain research and development activities, the results of its clinical trial, non-clinical animal efficacy studies, and research and development activities are largely beyond PharmAthene’s control.

The nature of clinical trials and PharmAthene’s business strategy of outsourcing substantially all of PharmAthene’s research and development and manufacturing work require that it relies on clinical research centers and other contractors to assist PharmAthene with research and development, clinical and non-clinical testing (including animal efficacy studies under the Animal Rule), patient enrollment, manufacturing and other activities. As a result, its success depends largely on the success of these third parties in performing their responsibilities. Although PharmAthene prequalify PharmAthene’s contractors and believe that they are fully capable of performing their contractual obligations, it cannot directly control the adequacy and timeliness of the resources and expertise that they apply to these activities. Furthermore, it has to compete with other biodefense and biopharmaceutical companies for access to this limited pool of highly specialized resources. If PharmAthene’s contractors do not perform their obligations in an adequate and timely manner or PharmAthene is unable to enter into contracts with them because of prior commitments to PharmAthene’s competitors, the pace of clinical or non-clinical development, regulatory approval and commercialization of its product candidates could be significantly delayed and PharmAthene’s prospects could be adversely affected.

PharmAthene depends on third parties to manufacture, package and distribute compounds for its product candidates and key components for its product candidates. The failure of these third parties to provide their services or to perform them successfully could harm PharmAthene’s business.

PharmAthene does not have any of its own manufacturing facilities. PharmAthene has therefore utilized, and intend to continue utilizing, third parties to manufacture, package and distribute its product candidates and key components of PharmAthene’s product candidates. Any material disruption in manufacturing (i.e. due to third party capacity or availability limitations) could cause a delay in its development programs and potential future sales. Furthermore, certain compounds, media, or other raw materials used to manufacture its drug candidates are available from any one or a limited number of sources. Any delays or difficulties in obtaining key components for its product candidates or in manufacturing, packaging or distributing its product candidates could delay clinical trials and further development of these potential products. Additionally, the third parties PharmAthene rely on for manufacturing and packaging are subject to regulatory review, and any regulatory compliance problems with these third parties could significantly delay or disrupt PharmAthene’s commercialization activities.

Finally, third-party manufacturers, suppliers and distributors, like most companies, have been adversely affected by the credit crisis and weakening of the global economy and as such may be more susceptible to being acquired as part of the current wave of consolidations in the pharmaceutical industry. It has, for example, become challenging for companies to secure debt capital to fund their operations as financial institutions have significantly curtailed their lending activities. If its third-party suppliers continue to experience financial difficulties as a result of weak demand for their products or for other reasons and are unable to obtain the capital necessary to continue their present level of operations or are acquired by others, they may have to reduce their activities and/or their priorities or PharmAthene’s working relationship with

50


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

them might change. A material deterioration in their ability or willingness to meet their obligations to PharmAthene could cause a delay in its development programs and potential future sales and jeopardize PharmAthene’s ability to meet its obligations under PharmAthene’s contracts with the government or other third parties.

PharmAthene faces, and likely will continue to face, competition from companies with greater financial, personnel and research and development resources. PharmAthene’s commercial opportunities will be reduced or eliminated if PharmAthene’s competitors are more successful in the development and marketing of their products.

The biopharmaceutical industry is characterized by rapid and significant technological change. PharmAthene’s success will depend on its ability to develop and apply its technologies in the design and development of its product candidates and to establish and maintain a market for its product candidates. There are many organizations, both public and private, including major pharmaceutical and chemical companies, specialized biotechnology firms, universities and other research institutions engaged in developing pharmaceutical and biotechnology products. Many of these organizations have substantially greater financial, technical, intellectual property, research and development, and human resources than PharmAthene has. Competitors may develop products or other technologies that are more effective than any that PharmAthene is developing or may obtain FDA approval for products more rapidly. For example, the U.S. government selected a plague vaccine product candidate from a competitor for advanced development funding, causing PharmAthene to wind down activities related to the development of its RypVaxTM product candidate in 2010.

If PharmAthene commences commercial sales of products, it still must compete in the manufacturing and marketing of such products, areas in which PharmAthene has limited experience. Many of these organizations also have manufacturing facilities and established marketing capabilities that would enable such companies to market competing products through existing channels of distribution. PharmAthene’s commercial opportunities will be reduced or eliminated if PharmAthene’s competitors develop and market products that:

are more effective;
have fewer or less severe adverse side effects;
are more adaptable to various modes of dosing;
obtain orphan drug exclusivity that blocks the approval of PharmAthene’s application for seven years;
are easier to administer; or
are less expensive than the products or product candidates that PharmAthene is, or in the future will be, developing.

While the regulatory climate for generic versions of biological products approved under a Biologics License Application, or a BLA, in the United States remains uncertain, and currently there is no formalized mechanism by which the FDA can approve a generic version of an approved biological product, Federal legislation has been introduced to establish a legal pathway for the approval of generic versions of approved biological products. If enacted, the legislation may impact the revenue projections for PharmAthene’s products.

Even if PharmAthene is successful in developing effective products, and obtains FDA and other regulatory approvals necessary for commercializing them, PharmAthene’s products may not compete effectively with other successful products. PharmAthene’s competitors may succeed in developing and marketing products either that are more effective than those that it may develop, alone or with PharmAthene’s collaborators, making PharmAthene’s products obsolete, or that are marketed before any products that it develops are marketed.

51


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Risks Related to Political and Social Factors

Political or social factors may delay or impair PharmAthene’s ability to market its products and its business may be materially adversely affected.

Products developed to treat diseases caused by, or to combat the threat of, bioterrorism will be subject to changing political and social environments. The political and social responses to bioterrorism have been unpredictable. Political or social pressures may delay or cause resistance to bringing PharmAthene’s products to market or limit pricing of PharmAthene’s products, which would harm PharmAthene’s business.

Risks Related to Intellectual Property

PharmAthene’s commercial success will be affected significantly by its ability (i) to obtain and maintain protection for its proprietary technology and that of its licensors and collaborators and (ii) not to infringe on patents and proprietary rights of third parties.

Issues surrounding patents of biotechnology firms often involve complex legal and factual questions, and, therefore, validity and enforceability cannot be predicted with certainty. To date, no consistent policy has emerged regarding the breadth of claims allowed in biotechnology patents. PharmAthene currently has five pending U.S. patent applications, and have a limited number of foreign patents and pending international and foreign patents applications. In addition, PharmAthene has rights under numerous other patents and patent applications pursuant to exclusive and non-exclusive license arrangements with licensors and collaborators. However, there can be no assurance that patent applications owned or licensed by PharmAthene will result in patents being issued or that the patents, whether existing or issued in the future, will afford protection against competitors with similar technology. Any conflicts resulting from third-party patent applications and patents could significantly reduce the coverage of the patents owned, optioned by or licensed to PharmAthene or its collaborators and limit its ability or that of its collaborators to obtain meaningful patent protection.

Further, PharmAthene’s commercial success will depend significantly on its ability to operate without infringing the patents and proprietary rights of third parties. PharmAthene is aware of one U.S. patent covering recombinant production of an antibody and a license may be required under such patent with respect to Valortim®, which is a monoclonal antibody and uses recombinant production technologies. Although the patent owner has granted licenses under such patent, PharmAthene cannot provide any assurances that it will be able to obtain such a license or that the terms thereof will be reasonable. If it does not obtain such a license and if a legal action based on such patent was to be brought against PharmAthene or its distributors, licensees or collaborators, PharmAthene cannot provide any assurances that it or its distributors, licensees or collaborators would prevail or that it has sufficient funds or resources to defend such claims.

The costs associated with establishing the validity of patents, of defending against patent infringement claims of others and of asserting infringement claims against others is expensive and time consuming, even if the ultimate outcome is favorable. An outcome of any patent prosecution or litigation that is unfavorable to it or one of its licensors or collaborators may have a material adverse effect on PharmAthene. The expense of a protracted infringement suit, even if ultimately favorable, would also have a material adverse effect on PharmAthene.

It furthermore relies upon trade secrets protection for PharmAthene’s confidential and proprietary information. PharmAthene has taken measures to protect PharmAthene’s proprietary information; however, these measures may not provide adequate protection to PharmAthene. PharmAthene has sought to protect PharmAthene’s proprietary information by entering into confidentiality agreements with employees, collaborators and consultants. Nevertheless, employees, collaborators or consultants may still disclose its proprietary information, and it may not be able to meaningfully protect PharmAthene’s trade secrets. In addition, others may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information or techniques or otherwise gain access to its trade secrets.

Risks Related to Regulatory Approvals and Legislation

PharmAthene’s use of hazardous materials and chemicals requires it to comply with regulatory requirements which may result in significant costs and expose it to potential liabilities.

PharmAthene’s research and development involves the controlled use of hazardous materials and chemicals. PharmAthene is subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws governing the use, manufacture,

52


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

storage, handling and disposal of such materials. PharmAthene will not be able to eliminate the risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials. In the event of such an accident, it could be forced to pay significant damages or fines, and these damages could exceed PharmAthene’s resources and any applicable insurance coverage. In addition, it may be required to incur significant costs to comply with regulatory requirements in the future.

Legislation limiting or restricting liability for medical products used to fight bioterrorism is new, and it cannot be certain that any such protection will apply to PharmAthene’s products or if applied what the scope of any such coverage will be.

The U.S. Public Readiness Act was signed into law in December 2005 and creates general immunity for manufacturers of countermeasures, including security countermeasures (as defined in Section 319F-2(c)(1)(B) of that act), when the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services issues a declaration for their manufacture, administration or use. The declaration is meant to provide general immunity from all claims under state or federal law for loss arising out of the administration or use of a covered countermeasure. Manufacturers are excluded from this protection in cases of willful misconduct. Although PharmAthene’s anthrax countermeasures have been covered under the general immunity provisions of the Public Readiness Act since October 1, 2008, there can be no assurance that the Secretary of Health and Human Services will make other declarations in the future that would cover any of PharmAthene’s other product candidates or that the U.S. Congress will not act in the future to reduce coverage under the Public Readiness Act or to repeal it altogether.

Upon a declaration by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, a compensation fund would be created to provide “timely, uniform, and adequate compensation to eligible individuals for covered injuries directly caused by the administration or use of a covered countermeasure.” The “covered injuries” to which the program applies are defined as serious physical injuries or death. Individuals are permitted to bring a willful misconduct action against a manufacturer only after they have exhausted their remedies under the compensation program. A willful misconduct action could be brought against PharmAthene if an individual(s) has exhausted their remedies under the compensation program which thereby could expose PharmAthene to liability. Furthermore, there is no assurance that the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue under this act a declaration to establish a compensation fund. PharmAthene may also become subject to standard product liability suits and other third party claims if products it develops which fall outside of the Public Readiness Act cause injury or if treated individuals subsequently become infected or otherwise suffer adverse effects from such products.

PharmAthene is required to comply with certain export control laws, which may limit its ability to sell its products to non-U.S. persons and may subject PharmAthene to regulatory requirements that may delay or limit PharmAthene’s ability to develop and commercialize its products.

PharmAthene’s product candidates are subject to the Export Administration Regulations, or EAR, administered by the U.S. Department of Commerce and are, in certain instances (such as aspects of PharmAthene’s nerve agent countermeasure product candidates) subject to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, or ITAR, administered by the U.S. Department of State. EAR restricts the export of dual-use products and technical data to certain countries, while ITAR restricts the export of defense products, technical data and defense services. The U.S. government agencies responsible for administering EAR and ITAR have significant discretion in the interpretation and enforcement of these regulations. Failure to comply with these regulations can result in criminal and civil penalties and may harm PharmAthene’s ability to enter into contracts with the U.S. government. It is also possible that these regulations could adversely affect PharmAthene’s ability to sell its products to non-U.S. customers.

Risks Related to Personnel

PharmAthene depends on its key technical and management personnel, and the loss of these personnel could impair the development of its products.

PharmAthene rely, and will continue to rely, on PharmAthene’s key management and scientific staff, all of whom are employed at-will. The loss of key personnel or the failure to recruit necessary additional qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect on PharmAthene’s business and results of operations.

53


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

There is intense competition from other companies, research and academic institutions and other organizations for qualified personnel. Furthermore uncertainties regarding the proposed merger can lead employees who are otherwise satisfied working for PharmAthene to leave the organization for other opportunities. PharmAthene may not be able to continue to attract and retain the qualified personnel necessary for the development of PharmAthene’s business. If PharmAthene does not succeed in retaining and recruiting necessary personnel or developing this expertise, its business could suffer significantly.

Biotechnology companies often become subject to claims that they or their employees wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of the employees’ former employers. Such litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to PharmAthene’s management.

As is commonplace in the biotechnology industry, PharmAthene employs individuals who were previously employed at other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies, including at competitors or potential competitors. Although no claims against PharmAthene are currently pending, it may be subject to claims that PharmAthene or its employees have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed trade secrets or other proprietary information of their former employers. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. Even if PharmAthene is successful in defending against these claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and distract management.

Risks Related to PharmAthene’s Common Stock and Under Its Loan Agreement

If it does not meet the continued listing standards of the NYSE MKT PharmAthene’s common stock could be delisted from trading, which could limit investors’ ability to make transactions in PharmAthene’s common stock and subject PharmAthene to additional trading restrictions.

PharmAthene’s common stock is listed on the NYSE MKT, a national securities exchange, which imposes continued listing requirements with respect to listed shares. For a description of the related risks, please see “RISK FACTORS — Risks Related to the Combined Company Following the Merger — In the event that the combined company fails to satisfy any of the listing requirements of the NYSE MKT, its common stock may be delisted, which could affect its market price and liquidity.”

PharmAthene’s stock price is volatile.

The market price of PharmAthene’s common stock has been, and it expects to continue to be, subject to significant volatility. The value of PharmAthene’s common stock may decline regardless of its operating performance or prospects. Factors that may affect PharmAthene’s market price include:

PharmAthene’s perceived prospects;
variations in PharmAthene’s operating results and whether it has achieved key business targets;
changes in, or PharmAthene’s failure to meet, revenue estimates;
changes in securities analysts’ buy/sell recommendations;
differences between PharmAthene’s reported results and those expected by investors and securities analysts;
announcements of new contracts by PharmAthene or its competitors;
reaction to any acquisitions, joint ventures or strategic investments announced by PharmAthene or its competitors; and
general economic, political or stock market conditions.

Shares that PharmAthene may issue in the future in connection with certain capital-raising transactions and shares available for future issuance upon exercise of warrants and options could dilute PharmAthene’s stockholders and depress the market price of its common stock.

The issuance of PharmAthene’s securities in the future may depress the market price of PharmAthene’s stock, and any such financing(s) will dilute PharmAthene’s existing stockholders.

54


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In addition, as of September 3, 2013, PharmAthene had outstanding options to purchase approximately 6.0 million shares of common stock (not including restricted shares). Additional shares are reserved for issuance under PharmAthene’s 2007 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan. PharmAthene’s stock options are generally exercisable for ten years, with a significant portion exercisable either immediately or beginning one year after the date of the grant.

PharmAthene filed two registration statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-161587 and 333-176607) covering the resale of shares issued upon conversion of PharmAthene’s 10% convertible notes and issuable upon exercise of related warrants by certain of PharmAthene’s affiliates, among other security holders. Both registration statements have been declared effective. PharmAthene is obligated under the terms of the related registration rights agreement to keep these registration statements effective. The sale by these security holders of their shares pursuant to the registration statement or otherwise could depress the market price of its common stock.

Finally, as of September 3, 2013, PharmAthene had issued and outstanding additional warrants to purchase up to approximately 5.6 million shares of common stock.

The issuance or even the expected issuance of a large number of shares of PharmAthene’s common stock upon conversion or exercise of the securities described above could depress the market price of its stock and the issuance of such shares will dilute the stock ownership of its existing stockholders. Shares that PharmAthene may issue in the future in connection with certain capital-raising transactions and shares available for future issuance upon exercise of warrants and options could dilute its stockholders and depress the market price of its common stock.

PharmAthene can give no assurances that it will ever pay dividends.

PharmAthene has not paid any dividends on its common stock in 2013, 2012, 2011, or 2010 and does not intend to declare any dividends in the foreseeable future. While subject to periodic review, PharmAthene’s current policy is to retain all earnings, if any, primarily to finance its future growth. The current loan and security agreement with GE Capital, or the GE Loan Agreement, specifically restricts the declaration or payment of any dividends. PharmAthene makes no assurances that it will ever pay dividends, cash or otherwise. Whether PharmAthene pays any dividends in the future will depend on its financial condition, results of operations, and other factors that it will consider.

PharmAthene’s fully-secured loan agreement with GE Capital is subject to acceleration in specified circumstances, including this merger, which may result in GE Capital taking possession and disposing of any collateral.

In the first quarter 2012, PharmAthene closed on a senior fully-secured debt facility with GE Capital providing for a $2.5 million term loan and a revolving line of credit of up to $5 million based on a percentage of PharmAthene’s outstanding qualified accounts receivable. PharmAthene’s obligations under the GE Loan Agreement are secured by a security interest in substantially all of PharmAthene’s assets. While the security interest does not, except in limited circumstances, cover PharmAthene’s intellectual property, it does cover any proceeds to PharmAthene from the use of intellectual property. The GE Loan Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants, including limitations on acquisitions, dispositions, incurrence of indebtedness and the granting of security interests. Upon the occurrence and during the continuance of any event of default, GE Capital may, and at the written request of the requisite lenders shall, terminate the commitments under the facilities and declare any or all of the obligations to be immediately due and payable, without demand or notice to PharmAthene. The completion of this merger and related transactions would, in the absence of a waiver, constitute an event of default under the loan agreement and permit GE Capital to terminate the commitments under the facilities and declare any or all of the obligations to be immediately due and payable, without demand or notice to PharmAthene. However, any event of default relating to timely payment of debts, insolvency, liquidation, bankruptcy or similar events will result in automatic acceleration. Among the remedies available to GE Capital in case of an event of default are the taking possession and disposition of any collateral under the GE Loan Agreement.

55


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Risks Related to Theraclone

You should consider the following factors in evaluating whether to approve the proposals described in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation. These factors should be considered in conjunction with the other information included by PharmAthene and Theraclone in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation. The risk factors relating to Theraclone will also apply to the combined company going forward because a substantial portion of the business of the combined company will be Theraclone’s business.

Risks Related to Theraclone’s Financial Condition and Need for Additional Capital

Theraclone has incurred operating losses in each year since its inception, expects to continue to incur substantial and increasing losses for the foreseeable future, and will require substantial additional capital to fund its operations.

Theraclone has been engaged in designing and developing compounds and product candidates since 2005 and has not generated any product revenue to date. Its net losses were $8.4 million, $2.8 million and $2.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 and the six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively. To date, Theraclone has financed its operations primarily through equity financings, collaborative deals and debt financing. It has devoted most of its resources to research and development, including its preclinical development activities and clinical trials. Theraclone has not completed development of any product candidates. Theraclone expects its research and development expenses to increase in the future due to increased manufacturing and clinical development costs, primarily related to the costs of its clinical trials and the advancement of its preclinical studies, and to product candidate manufacturing costs. As a result, Theraclone expects to continue to incur substantial and increasing losses for the foreseeable future. Without substantial additional capital, Theraclone will exhaust its resources and be unable to continue operations. Theraclone is uncertain when or if it will be able to achieve or sustain profitability. Failure to become and remain profitable would adversely affect Theraclone’s ability to continue its operations.

If Theraclone fails to obtain the capital necessary to fund its operations, Theraclone may be unable to develop its product candidates, and Theraclone could be forced to share its rights to these product candidates on terms that may be unfavorable to Theraclone.

Theraclone needs large amounts of capital to support the development of its product candidates and its research and development efforts. Theraclone intends to raise funds through government contracts, strategic partnerships, by issuing additional equity or debt securities, or both, or by incurring other indebtedness. If Theraclone is unable to raise additional capital in sufficient amounts or on terms acceptable to it, Theraclone will be unable to advance development of its product candidates, unable to advance its research and development efforts and may enter into collaborations on terms that are not favorable to Theraclone.

Taking into account its projected operating results, Theraclone believes that its current aggregate cash and cash equivalents balances of $7.2 million as of June 30, 2013 will provide adequate resources to fund its operations into the second quarter of 2014. Its financial forecast reflects use of available cash to cover costs associated with continued clinical development of Theraclone’s product candidates, TCN-032 and TCN-202, facilities, employee related expenses, and preclinical activities supporting Theraclone’s other product candidates and discovery efforts. However, Theraclone can provide no assurance that the assumptions underlying its financial forecasts will be accurate, that it will not incur additional costs that are not included in its financial forecasts, that it will have sufficient resources to fund its operations or that it will achieve its projected operating results.

The amount of capital that Theraclone will require in the future will depend on a variety of factors, many of which are unpredictable, including:

the costs and timing associated with the closing of the merger;
the scope, rate of progress, results and costs of its discovery research, preclinical testing, clinical trials, and other research and development activities;
the cost of establishing clinical and commercial supplies of its product candidates;
the number of programs Theraclone pursues;

56


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the cost of preparing, filing, prosecuting, defending, and enforcing any patent claims and other intellectual property rights;
the cost, timing, and outcomes of regulatory approvals; and
the extent to which Theraclone acquires or invests in other businesses, products, or technologies.

While Theraclone has in the past raised capital from venture capital funds and other sources, Theraclone can give no assurance that funding will continue to be available. If Theraclone is unable to raise additional capital in sufficient amounts and on terms acceptable to it, Theraclone may be required to issue its equity or debt securities, sell or license its assets, or agree to be acquired, on terms that may not be favorable to Theraclone or to its stockholders.

Theraclone’s loan agreements with MidCap Financial and Silicon Valley Bank could restrict Theraclone’s ability to, among other things, sell certain assets, engage in a merger or change in control transaction, incur debt, pay cash dividends, and make investments without first obtaining the bank’s consent.

In May 2011, Theraclone entered into a loan agreement for equipment purchases with Silicon Valley Bank. Under the terms of this loan agreement, Theraclone borrowed $1.5 million in three separate tranches from May 2011 to May 2012 that bear interest at the rate of 5.5% per annum. The three borrowings mature at dates ranging from March 2014 through November 2014 and are collateralized by the laboratory and office equipment purchased with the proceeds of the borrowings.

In March 2013, Theraclone entered into a credit and security agreement with MidCap Financial and Silicon Valley Bank under which it can borrow up to $6 million for working capital purposes. Theraclone borrowed $3 million under the credit and security agreement in March 2013, and borrowed the remaining $3 million in August 2013. The credit facility has a term of 45 months and bears interest at a rate of 7%, with an interest-only period of nine months from initiation of the agreement. The credit and security agreement is secured by substantially all of Theraclone’s assets, with the exception of Theraclone’s intellectual property and the laboratory and office equipment purchased with the proceeds of the loan agreement with Silicon Valley Bank.

The loan agreement and the credit and security agreement also contain events of default that are customary for credit facilities of this type, including payment defaults, financial condition and solvency defaults and the occurrence of certain material adverse change events. The occurrence of an event of default could result in the acceleration of the obligations under the loan agreement and the credit and security agreement. The loan agreement and the credit and security agreement could restrict Theraclone’s ability to, among other things, sell certain assets, engage in a merger or change in control transaction, incur debt, pay cash dividends, and make investments without first obtaining MidCap Financial and Silicon Valley Bank’s consent.

Risks Related to Clinical Development Programs and Regulatory Approval

Theraclone’s success depends on the success of its product candidates, TCN-032 and TCN-202, and Theraclone cannot be certain that either product candidate will be safe or effective, successfully complete clinical trials, receive regulatory approval or be successfully commercialized.

TCN-032, one of Theraclone’s product candidates, has completed a Phase 2a clinical trial for the treatment of influenza. TCN-202, Theraclone’s other product candidate, has completed a Phase 1 clinical trial and began a Phase 2a study in August 2013 for the prevention of cytomegalovirus infection in high risk kidney transplant patients. Additional clinical trials will be required before Theraclone will be able to submit a Biologic License Application, or BLA, to the FDA for approval for either product candidate, if ever. The development and regulatory approval process takes many years to complete and requires the expenditure of substantial resources. Moreover, despite Theraclone’s expenditure of substantial resources and its continued efforts to develop TCN-032 and TCN-202, the clinical trials required for FDA approval of either TCN-032 or TCN-202 may never be successfully completed. If the required clinical trials are not completed successfully, neither TCN-032 nor TCN-202 will receive regulatory approval. Even if TCN-032 and TCN-202 receive regulatory approvals, they may never be successfully commercialized. If either TCN-032 or TCN-202 does not receive regulatory approval or is not successfully commercialized, Theraclone may be unable to generate revenue, or become profitable, which would adversely affect its ability to continue operations.

57


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone does not have a broad product candidate portfolio, and as a result, its business is highly dependent on the successful development of only two product candidates.

Theraclone has only two clinical stage product candidates, TCN-032 and TCN-202. As a result, until such time Theraclone is able to build a broader product candidate portfolio, if ever, any adverse developments in the clinic with respect to either one of Theraclone’s two product candidates would have a more significant adverse impact on its overall business than if Theraclone maintained a broader portfolio of product candidates.

Any failure or delay in commencing or completing clinical trials for its product candidates could harm Theraclone’s business.

To date, only TCN-032 and TCN-202 have entered clinical trials. The commencement and completion of clinical trials for Theraclone’s product candidates may be delayed or prevented by many factors, including:

having the capital resources available to fund preclinical studies and clinical trials;
Theraclone’s ability to obtain regulatory approval to commence clinical trials;
Theraclone’s ability to manufacture or obtain from third parties materials sufficient for use in preclinical studies and clinical trials;
delays in patient enrollment and variability in the number and types of patients available for clinical trials;
competition from other companies for a limited number of types of patients available for clinical trials;
poor effectiveness of product candidates during clinical trials;
safety issues or side effects;
governmental or regulatory delays related to clinical trials, including trial design, results, and materials supply;
changes in regulatory requirements, policy, and guidelines; and
varying interpretation of data by Theraclone, the FDA, and similar foreign regulatory agencies.

It is possible that neither of Theraclone’s product candidates will successfully complete the required clinical trials. Accordingly, Theraclone may not seek or receive the regulatory approvals necessary to market its product candidates. Any failure or delay in commencing or completing clinical trials or obtaining regulatory approvals for product candidates would prevent or delay their commercialization.

The results of Theraclone’s preclinical studies using animal models may not be predictive of the results that Theraclone will see in its clinical trials. The prior results achieved by Theraclone in preclinical studies or clinical trials may not be indicative of future results in subsequent clinical trials. In addition, in the case of TCN-032, results in early-stage clinical trials that are based on a limited number of subjects artificially infected with the flu virus may not be predictive of the results that Theraclone will see in clinical trials involving large numbers of patients naturally infected with influenza.

Theraclone’s progress and results from the early phases of clinical trials of its product candidates may not be indicative of progress or results that will be achieved with larger populations, which could be unfavorable. Moreover, Theraclone does not know if any favorable results it achieves in earlier and smaller clinical trials will have a lasting or repeatable effect. If a larger group of subjects does not experience positive results or if any favorable results do not demonstrate a beneficial effect, Theraclone’s product candidates may not receive approval from the FDA for further clinical trials or commercialization.

Theraclone may be unable to successfully identify additional product candidates.

As a significant part of its growth strategy, Theraclone intends to develop and commercialize additional product candidates through its research program using its proprietary I-STAR platform. The success of this strategy depends upon Theraclone’s ability to identify and select product candidates that fit into its development plans. Theraclone’s efforts in drug discovery and development using the I-STAR platform have

58


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

yielded only two product candidates to date, TCN-032 and TCN-202. Theraclone cannot be certain that it will be able to successfully identify any new product candidates and, even if Theraclone’s research program initially shows promise in identifying potential product candidates, it may fail to yield product candidates suitable for clinical development.

Products that appear promising in research and development may be delayed or may fail to reach later stages of clinical development.

The successful development of pharmaceutical products is highly uncertain. Product candidates that appear promising in research and development may be delayed or fail to reach later stages of development. Decisions regarding the further development of product candidates must be made with limited and incomplete data, which makes it difficult to ensure or even accurately predict whether the allocation of limited resources and the expenditure of additional capital on specific product candidates will result in desired outcomes. Preclinical and clinical data can be interpreted in different ways, and negative or inconclusive results or adverse medical events during a clinical trial could delay, limit or prevent the development of a product candidate, which would harm Theraclone’s business.

Theraclone is subject to extensive and rigorous governmental regulation, including the requirement of approval before its products may be lawfully marketed.

Before obtaining regulatory approvals for the commercial sale of any product candidate, Theraclone must demonstrate through preclinical testing and clinical trials that the product candidate is safe and effective for use in each target indication. This process takes many years and requires the expenditure of substantial resources. To date, Theraclone has not successfully demonstrated in clinical trials safety or efficacy sufficient for regulatory approval for any product candidate. Theraclone cannot assure you that its product candidates will demonstrate sufficient safety and efficacy for regulatory approval. Theraclone may also encounter delays or rejections due to additional government regulation from future legislation, administrative action, or changes in FDA policy. If Theraclone’s current product candidates are not shown to be safe and effective in clinical trials, Theraclone’s business would be harmed. If Theraclone is unable to discover or successfully develop drugs that are effective and safe in humans and receive regulatory approval, Theraclone’s business could be harmed. Theraclone does not expect any of its current product candidates to be commercially available in major markets before 2019, if ever.

Although Theraclone has received orphan drug designation, or ODD, for TCN-202, if Theraclone obtains regulatory approval for TCN-202, at the time of such approval, or subsequent to such approval, Theraclone may not receive or may lose marketing exclusivity.

In January 2011, Theraclone obtained ODD in the United States for TCN-202 for the prevention of congenital CMV infection following primary CMV infection in pregnant women. In general, the first BLA applicant to receive FDA approval for a particular active ingredient to treat to an orphan indication is entitled to a seven-year exclusive marketing period for that active ingredient for that disease indication. Although during the exclusivity period the FDA generally may not approve any other application to market any drug for the same orphan indication, it may do so if the competing drug shows clinical superiority in that it is determined to be safer, more effective or makes a major contribution to patient care.

Failure to obtain regulatory approval in foreign jurisdictions would prevent Theraclone from marketing its products internationally.

Theraclone intends to have its product candidates marketed outside the United States. To market its products in the European Union and many other non-U.S. jurisdictions, Theraclone must obtain separate regulatory approvals and comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements. To date, Theraclone has not filed for marketing approval of any of its product candidates and may not receive the approvals necessary to commercialize its product candidates in any market. The approval procedure varies among countries and can involve additional testing and data review. The time required to obtain foreign regulatory approval may differ from that required to obtain FDA approval. The foreign regulatory approval process may include all of the risks associated with obtaining FDA approval, or may include different or additional risks. Theraclone may not obtain foreign regulatory approvals on a timely basis, if at all. Approval by the FDA does not ensure

59


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

approval by regulatory agencies in other countries, and approval by one foreign regulatory authority does not ensure approval by regulatory agencies in other foreign countries or by the FDA. Any failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one jurisdiction may have a negative effect on the regulatory approval process in other jurisdictions, including approval by the FDA. Failure to obtain regulatory approval in foreign jurisdictions would harm Theraclone’s business.

Even if Theraclone’s product candidates receive regulatory approval, they could be subject to restrictions or withdrawal from the market and Theraclone may be subject to penalties if Theraclone fails to comply with regulatory requirements or if Theraclone experiences unanticipated problems with its products.

Any product candidate for which Theraclone receives regulatory approval, together with the manufacturing processes, post-approval clinical data, and advertising and promotional activities for such product, will be subject to continued review and regulation by the FDA and other regulatory agencies. Even if regulatory approval of a product candidate is granted, the approval may be subject to limitations on the indicated uses for which the product candidate may be marketed or on the conditions of approval, or contain requirements for costly post-marketing testing and surveillance to monitor the safety or efficacy of the product candidate. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with Theraclone’s products or their manufacture, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in, among other things:

restrictions on the products or manufacturing processes;
withdrawal of the products from the market;
voluntary or mandatory recalls;
fines;
suspension of regulatory approvals;
product seizures; or
injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties.

If Theraclone is slow or otherwise unable to adapt to changes in existing regulatory requirements, Theraclone may lose marketing approval for any products that may be approved in the future.

Theraclone’s product candidates may never achieve market acceptance even if Theraclone obtains regulatory approvals.

Even if Theraclone obtains regulatory approvals for the commercial sale of its product candidates, the commercial success of these product candidates will depend on, among other things, their acceptance by physicians, patients, third-party payors, and other members of the medical community as a therapeutic and cost-effective alternative to competing products and treatments. If Theraclone’s product candidates fail to gain market acceptance, Theraclone may be unable to earn sufficient revenue to continue its business. Market acceptance of, and demand for, any product that Theraclone may develop and commercialize will depend on many factors, including:

Theraclone’s ability to provide acceptable evidence of safety and efficacy;
the prevalence and severity of adverse side effects;
availability, relative cost, and relative efficacy of alternative and competing treatments;
the effectiveness of Theraclone’s marketing and distribution strategy;
publicity concerning Theraclone’s products or competing products and treatments; and
Theraclone’s ability to obtain sufficient third-party insurance coverage or reimbursement.

If Theraclone’s product candidates do not become widely accepted by physicians, patients, third-party payors, and other members of the medical community, Theraclone’s business would be harmed.

60


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

If any products Theraclone develops become subject to unfavorable pricing regulations, third-party reimbursement practices, or healthcare reform initiatives, Theraclone’s business would be harmed.

Theraclone’s ability to commercialize any product candidate profitably will depend in part on the extent to which reimbursement for such product candidate and related treatments will be available from government health administration authorities, private health insurers or private payors, and other organizations in the United States and internationally. Even if Theraclone succeeds in bringing one or more product candidates to market, these products may not be considered cost-effective, and the amount reimbursed for any product may be insufficient to allow Theraclone to sell it profitably. Because Theraclone’s product candidates are in the early stages of development, Theraclone is unable at this time to determine their cost-effectiveness and the level or method of reimbursement. There may be significant delays in obtaining coverage for newly approved products, and coverage may be more limited than the purposes for which the product candidate is approved by the FDA or foreign regulatory agencies. Moreover, eligibility for coverage does not mean that any product will be reimbursed in all cases or at a rate that covers Theraclone’s costs, including research, development, manufacture, sale and distribution. Increasingly, the third-party payors who reimburse patients, such as government and private payors, are requiring that companies provide them with predetermined discounts from list prices and are challenging the prices charged for medical products. If the reimbursement Theraclone is able to obtain for any product is inadequate in light of Theraclone’s development and other costs, its business would be harmed.

Recently enacted and future legislation may increase the difficulty and cost for Theraclone to obtain marketing approval of and commercialize its product candidates and affect the prices Theraclone may obtain.

In the United States and some foreign jurisdictions, there have been a number of legislative and regulatory changes and proposed changes regarding the healthcare system that could prevent or delay marketing approval of Theraclone’s product candidates, restrict or regulate post-approval activities and affect its ability to profitably sell any products for which Theraclone obtains marketing approval.

In the United States, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, or Medicare Modernization Act, changed the way Medicare covers and pays for pharmaceutical products. The legislation expanded Medicare coverage for drug purchases by the elderly and introduced a new reimbursement methodology based on average sales prices for physician administered drugs. In addition, this legislation provided authority for limiting the number of drugs that will be covered in any therapeutic class. Cost reduction initiatives and other provisions of this legislation could decrease the coverage and price that Theraclone receives for any approved products. While the Medicare Modernization Act applies only to drug benefits for Medicare beneficiaries, private payors often follow Medicare coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their own reimbursement rates. Therefore, any reduction in reimbursement that results from the Medicare Modernization Act may result in a similar reduction in payments from private payors.

In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, or the Health Care Reform Law, was enacted to broaden access to health insurance, reduce or constrain the growth of healthcare spending, enhance remedies against fraud and abuse, add new transparency requirements for health care and health insurance industries, impose new taxes and fees on the health industry and impose additional health policy reforms. The Health Care Reform Law revises the definition of “average manufacturer price” for reporting purposes, which could increase the amount of Medicaid drug rebates to states. Further, the new law imposes a significant annual fee on companies that manufacture or import branded prescription drug products. New provisions affecting compliance have also been enacted, which may affect Theraclone’s business practices with health care practitioners. Theraclone will not know the full effects of the Health Care Reform Law until applicable federal and state agencies issue regulations or guidance under the new law. Although it is too early to determine the effect of the Health Care Reform Law, the new law appears likely to continue the pressure on pharmaceutical pricing, especially under the Medicare program, and may also increase Theraclone’s regulatory burdens and operating costs.

Legislative and regulatory proposals have been made to expand post-approval requirements and restrict sales and promotional activities for pharmaceutical products. Theraclone is not sure whether additional

61


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

legislative changes will be enacted, or whether the FDA regulations, guidance or interpretations will be changed, or what the impact of such changes on the marketing approvals of Theraclone’s product candidates, if any, may be.

Risks Related to Theraclone’s Reliance on Third Parties

Theraclone relies on third-party manufacturers to supply cell lines and produce bulk drug substance and drug product required for its clinical studies. Failure by such third-party manufacturers to produce sufficient drug product for clinical trials in timely or cost efficient manner would delay or increase the costs associated with Theraclone’s clinical development activities.

Theraclone relies on third-party manufacturers to supply cell lines and produce bulk drug substance and drug product required for its clinical studies. If such third-party manufacturers are not able to produce sufficient cell lines, bulk drug substance, or drug product required for Theraclone’s clinical studies in timely or cost efficient manner, Theraclone must enter into supply agreements with new manufacturers and, if Theraclone is unable to enter into supply agreements with new manufacturers on commercially acceptable terms or on a timely basis, Theraclone may be unable to complete its product development efforts in a timely manner, if at all.

Additionally, any manufacturer of Theraclone’s product candidates and approved products, if any, must comply with cGMP requirements enforced by the FDA through its right to inspect facilities. These requirements include quality control, quality assurance, and the maintenance of records and documentation. Manufacturers of Theraclone’s product candidates and approved products, if any, may be unable to comply with these cGMP requirements and with other FDA, state, and foreign regulatory requirements, as applicable. Theraclone has little control over its manufacturers’ compliance with these regulations and standards. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in fines and civil penalties, suspension of production, suspension or delay in product approval, product seizure or recall, or withdrawal of product approval. If the safety of any quantities supplied is compromised due to Theraclone’s manufacturers’ failure to adhere to applicable laws or for other reasons, Theraclone may be unable to obtain regulatory approval for or successfully commercialize its products, which would harm its business.

Theraclone relies on third parties to conduct its clinical trials. If these third parties do not perform as contractually required or otherwise expected, Theraclone may be unable to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize its product candidates.

Theraclone does not currently conduct its own clinical trials and Theraclone depends on third parties, such as CROs, medical institutions, clinical investigators, and contract laboratories, to conduct its clinical trials. Theraclone has, in the ordinary course of business, entered into agreements with these third parties. Nonetheless, Theraclone is responsible for confirming that each of its clinical trials is conducted in accordance with its general investigational plan and protocol. Moreover, the FDA requires Theraclone to comply with regulations and standards, commonly referred to as good clinical practices, for conducting, recording, and reporting the results of clinical trials to ensure that data and reported results are credible and accurate and that the trial participants are adequately protected. Theraclone’s reliance on third parties does not relieve it of these responsibilities and requirements. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or regulatory obligations or meet expected deadlines, if the third parties need to be replaced or if the quality or accuracy of the data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to Theraclone’s clinical protocols or regulatory requirements or for other reasons, Theraclone’s clinical trials may be extended, delayed, suspended, or terminated, and Theraclone may be unable to obtain regulatory approval for its product candidates.

Theraclone may be unable to obtain and maintain additional third-party relationships that are necessary to develop, commercialize and manufacture some or all of Theraclone’s product candidates or to expand its pipeline by adding new candidates.

Theraclone expects to depend on collaborators, partners, licensees, licensors, CROs, manufacturers and other third parties and strategic partners to support Theraclone’s discovery and development efforts, to formulate product candidates, to conduct clinical trials for some or all of its product candidates, to

62


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

manufacture clinical and commercial scale quantities of its product candidates and products and to market, sell, and distribute any products Theraclone successfully develops. Theraclone also contracts with third parties for the filling, labeling, packaging, storage and distribution of investigational drug products. As a result, its success depends largely on the success of these third parties in performing their responsibilities. Although Theraclone prequalifies these third parties and believes that they are fully capable of performing their contractual obligations, it cannot directly control the adequacy and timeliness of resources and expertise that these third parties apply to these activities. Furthermore, it has to compete with other biopharmaceutical companies for access to this limited pool of highly specialized resources. Theraclone cannot guarantee that it will be able to successfully negotiate agreements for or maintain relationships with collaborators, partners, licensees, clinical investigators, manufacturers and other third parties on favorable terms, if at all. If Theraclone is unable to obtain or maintain these agreements, Theraclone may be unable to develop, formulate, manufacture, obtain regulatory approvals for or commercialize its product candidates.

Risks Related to Theraclone’s Intellectual Property

If Theraclone’s technology or its product candidates conflict with the rights of others, Theraclone may be unable to manufacture or market its product candidates, which could harm Theraclone’s business.

Theraclone’s commercial success will depend in part on not infringing the patents or violating the proprietary rights of third parties. Issued patents held by others may limit Theraclone’s ability to develop commercial products. All issued U.S. patents are entitled to a presumption of validity under U.S. law. Theraclone’s commercial success will depend significantly on Theraclone’s ability to operate without infringing the patents and proprietary rights of third parties. If Theraclone needs licenses to such patents to permit it to manufacture, develop, or market its product candidates Theraclone may be required to pay significant fees or royalties. Theraclone cannot be certain that it would be able to obtain such licenses. For example, Theraclone is aware of one U.S. patent family covering recombinant production of an antibody under which a license may be required with respect to a monoclonal antibody that uses recombinant production technologies. Theraclone cannot provide any assurances that it would be able to obtain such a license or that the terms thereof would be reasonable. If it does not obtain such a license, legal action based on such patents could be brought against Theraclone or Theraclone’s distributors, licensees or collaborators, Competitors or third parties may have or may obtain patents that may cover subject matter Theraclone uses in developing the technology required to bring its products to market, producing its products, or treating patients with its products. If use of technology incorporated into or used to produce Theraclone’s product candidates is challenged, or if Theraclone’s processes or product candidates conflict with patent rights of others, third parties could bring legal actions against it claiming damages and seeking to enjoin manufacturing and marketing of the affected products. Additionally, it is not possible to predict with certainty what patent claims may issue from pending applications. With respect to patent applications filed solely in the United States, for example, patent prosecution could proceed in secret prior to issuance of a patent. As a result, third parties with such patent applications could obtain patents with claims relating to Theraclone’s product candidates, which they could attempt to assert against Theraclone without Theraclone’s prior knowledge. Further, as Theraclone develops its products, such third parties may assert that Theraclone infringes the patents currently held or licensed by them and Theraclone cannot predict the outcome of any such action.

Theraclone does not hold any patents covering its I-STAR platform and intends to rely solely on trade secret protection. Confidentiality agreements with employees and third parties may not prevent unauthorized disclosure of trade secrets and other proprietary information.

Theraclone’s I-STAR platform is based on its confidential and proprietary information but is not currently covered by any patents. Theraclone protects this information as trade secrets, which may be inadvertently disclosed or misappropriated. If this were to occur, Theraclone’s business would be harmed.

Trade secrets offer a relatively limited form of protection as they do not create any barrier for third parties who independently develop this information and who may even patent the information. In the course of Theraclone’s research and development activities and its business activities, Theraclone often relies on confidentiality agreements to try to protect Theraclone’s proprietary information. Such confidentiality agreements may be used, for example, when Theraclone talks to vendors of laboratory or clinical development services or potential strategic partners. In addition, each of Theraclone’s employees is required to sign a

63


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

confidentiality agreement upon joining Theraclone. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that an employee or an outside party will not make an unauthorized disclosure of Theraclone’s proprietary confidential information. This might happen intentionally or inadvertently. It is possible that a competitor will make use of such information, and that Theraclone’s competitive position will be compromised, in spite of any legal action Theraclone might take against persons making such unauthorized disclosures. In addition, others may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information or techniques or otherwise gain access to Theraclone’s trade secrets. Enforcing a claim that a third party illegally obtained and is using any of Theraclone’s trade secrets is expensive and time consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, courts outside the United States sometimes are less willing than U.S. courts to protect trade secrets. Moreover, Theraclone’s competitors may independently develop equivalent knowledge, methods and know-how, which would harm its business.

Theraclone may incur substantial costs as a result of litigation or other proceedings relating to patent and other intellectual property rights.

There has been significant litigation in the biotechnology industry over patents and other proprietary rights, and if Theraclone becomes involved in any litigation it could consume a substantial portion of its resources, regardless of the outcome of the litigation. Many of Theraclone’s competitors may be better able to sustain the costs of complex patent litigation because they have substantially greater resources. If any legal action against Theraclone is successful, in addition to any potential liability for damages, Theraclone could be required to obtain a license, grant cross-licenses, or pay substantial royalties in order to continue to manufacture or market the affected products. Theraclone cannot assure you that it would prevail in any legal action or that any license required under a third-party patent would be made available on acceptable terms, if at all. In addition, uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of any litigation could harm Theraclone’s business. Ultimately, Theraclone could be prevented from commercializing a product or be forced to cease some aspect of its business operations as a result of claims of patent infringement or violation of other intellectual property rights, which could harm Theraclone’s business. Should third parties file patent applications, or be issued patents claiming technology also claimed by Theraclone in pending applications, Theraclone may be required to participate in interference proceedings in the USPTO to determine priority of invention, which could result in substantial costs to Theraclone and an adverse decision as to the priority of its inventions. An unfavorable outcome in an interference proceeding could require Theraclone to cease using the technology or to license rights from prevailing third parties. Theraclone cannot assure you that any prevailing party would offer it a license or do so on commercially acceptable terms.

If Theraclone is unable to obtain, maintain, and enforce its proprietary rights, Theraclone may be unable to compete effectively or operate profitably.

Theraclone’s success depends in part on obtaining, maintaining, and enforcing its patents and other proprietary rights, and will depend in large part on its ability to:

obtain and maintain patent and other proprietary protection for Theraclone’s technology, processes, and product candidates;
enforce patents once issued and defend those patents if their enforceability is challenged;
preserve trade secrets, in particular with respect to its I-STAR platform; and
operate without infringing the patents and proprietary rights of third parties.

The degree of future protection for Theraclone’s proprietary rights is uncertain. For example:

Theraclone might not have been the first to make the inventions claimed in its patents, if issued, or disclosed in its pending patent applications;
Theraclone might not have been the first to file patent applications for these inventions;
others may independently develop similar or alternative technologies or duplicate any of Theraclone technologies;

64


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

it is possible that none of Theraclone’s pending patent applications will result in issued patents or, if issued, these patents may not be sufficient to protect its technology or provide Theraclone with a basis for commercially viable products, and may not provide Theraclone with any competitive advantages;
if Theraclone’s pending applications issue as patents, they may be challenged by third parties as infringing, invalid, or unenforceable under U.S. or foreign laws; and
Theraclone may develop additional proprietary technologies that are not patentable and that may not be adequately protected through trade secrets, if, for example, a competitor were to independently develop duplicative, similar, or alternative technologies.

The patent position of biotechnology and pharmaceutical firms is highly uncertain and involves many complex legal and technical issues. There is no clear policy involving the breadth of claims allowed in patents or the degree of protection afforded under patents. Theraclone cannot assure you that patent applications owned by or licensed to it will result in patents being issued or that, if issued, the patents will give Theraclone an advantage over competitors with similar technology, nor can Theraclone assure you that Theraclone can obtain, maintain, and enforce all ownership and other proprietary rights necessary to develop and commercialize its product candidates.

Even if any or all of Theraclone’s patent applications issue as patents, others may challenge the validity, inventorship, ownership, enforceability, or scope of Theraclone’s patents or other technology used in or otherwise necessary for the development and commercialization of Theraclone’s product candidates. Theraclone cannot assure you that any such challenge would not be successful. Moreover, the cost of litigation to uphold the validity of patents to prevent infringement or to otherwise protect Theraclone’s proprietary rights can be substantial. If the outcome of litigation is adverse to Theraclone, third parties may be able to use the challenged technologies without payment to Theraclone. Theraclone cannot assure you that Theraclone’s patents, if issued, will not be infringed or successfully avoided through design innovation. Intellectual property lawsuits are expensive and would consume time and other resources, even if the outcome were successful. In addition, there is a risk that a court would decide that Theraclone’s patents, if issued, are not valid and that Theraclone does not have the right to stop the other party from using the inventions. There is also the risk that, even if the validity of a patent were upheld, a court would refuse to stop the other party from using the inventions, including on the ground that its activities do not infringe that patent.

Risks Related to Theraclone’s Business Operations and Industry

Theraclone depends on its senior management and scientific personnel, and Theraclone’s business would be harmed if Theraclone is unable to attract and retain key personnel necessary for its success.

Theraclone is highly dependent on its senior management, especially Clifford J. Stocks, Theraclone’s Chief Executive Officer, Russ Hawkinson, Theraclone’s Chief Financial Officer, Eleanor Ramos, M.D., Theraclone’s Chief Medical Officer, and Kristine Swiderek, Ph.D., Theraclone’s Chief Scientific Officer. Theraclone’s success will depend on its ability to retain senior management and to attract, retain, and motivate qualified personnel in the future, including scientists, clinicians, and other highly skilled personnel and to integrate current and additional personnel in all departments. Competition for senior management personnel, as well as scientists, is intense and Theraclone may be unable to retain its personnel. The loss of any members of Theraclone’s senior management or any scientists, in particular, to a competitor, could hinder Theraclone’s ability to develop and commercialize Theraclone’s product candidates. The loss of a member of Theraclone’s senior management or professional staff would require the remaining senior executive officers to divert immediate and substantial attention to seeking a replacement.

Theraclone has entered into strategic partnerships and intends to enter into additional strategic partnerships in the future. In any strategic partnership Theraclone may be required to relinquish important rights to and control over the development of its product candidates or otherwise be subject to terms unfavorable to Theraclone.

By entering into any strategic partnerships, Theraclone is and will be subject to a number of risks, including:

65


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone may be unable to control the amount and timing of resources that its strategic partners devote to the development or commercialization of product candidates;
strategic partners may delay clinical trials, design clinical trials in a manner with which Theraclone does not agree, provide insufficient funding, terminate a clinical trial or abandon a product candidate, repeat or conduct new clinical trials, or require a new version of a product candidate for clinical testing;
strategic partners may not pursue further development and commercialization of products resulting from the strategic partnering arrangement or may elect to discontinue research and development programs;
strategic partners may not commit adequate resources to the marketing and distribution of any future products, limiting Theraclone’s potential revenues from these products;
disputes may arise between Theraclone and its strategic partners that result in the delay or termination of the research, development, or commercialization of Theraclone’s product candidates or that result in costly litigation or arbitration that diverts management’s attention and consumes resources;
strategic partners may experience financial difficulties;
strategic partners may not properly maintain or defend Theraclone’s intellectual property rights or may use Theraclone’s proprietary information in a manner that could jeopardize or invalidate Theraclone’s proprietary information or expose Theraclone to potential litigation;
business combinations or significant changes in a strategic partner’s business strategy may also adversely affect a strategic partner’s willingness or ability to complete its obligations under any arrangement;
strategic partners could independently move forward with a competing product candidate developed either independently or in collaboration with others, including Theraclone’s competitors; and
strategic partners could terminate the arrangement or allow it to expire, which would delay the development and may increase the cost of developing Theraclone’s product candidates.

The occurrence of any of these risks could negatively impact the development of Theraclone’s product candidates.

Several companies, which have substantial experience and resources, have products or are developing product candidates in the areas Theraclone has targeted for its product candidates.

For Theraclone’s product candidates in development, Theraclone faces competition from other entities involved in the research and development of therapeutic proteins, antibody products and pharmaceuticals, including Roche/Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Vertex, Astellas, Chimerix and Merck. A number of Theraclone’s largest competitors are pursuing the development or marketing of pharmaceuticals that address the same diseases that Theraclone is pursuing, and the number of companies seeking to develop products and therapies for these diseases may increase. Theraclone also faces competition from entities developing other types of products targeting particular diseases, including other biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, universities, public and private research institutions, government entities and other organizations.

Furthermore, Theraclone’s potential products, if approved and commercialized, may compete against well-established therapeutic protein-based products or well-established antibody products, many of which may be currently reimbursed by government health administration authorities, private health insurers and health maintenance organizations. For example, if approved for the treatment of influenza, Theraclone anticipates that its product candidate, TCN-032, would compete with other therapies for influenza, including existing antivirals (oseltamivir, zanamivir) and other products in development (peramivir, anti-HA antibodies, VX-787, nitazoxanide). If approved for the treatment of CMV, Theraclone anticipates that its product candidate, TCN-202, would compete with other therapies for CMV, including existing antivirals (ganciclovir, valganciclovir), and other products in development (CMX-001, letermovir and ASP0113).

66


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Many of Theraclone’s existing and potential competitors have substantially greater research, product development and commercial capabilities, and financial, scientific, marketing and human resources than Theraclone does. As a result, these competitors may:

succeed in developing therapeutic protein-based products or alternative therapies, earlier than Theraclone does;
obtain approvals for products from the FDA or other regulatory agencies more rapidly than Theraclone does;
obtain patents that block or otherwise inhibit Theraclone’s ability to develop and commercialize its product candidates;
develop treatments or cures that are safer, more effective, convenient or economical than those Theraclone proposes to develop;
devote greater resources to marketing or selling their products;
introduce products that make the continued development of Theraclone’s potential products uneconomical;
withstand price competition more successfully than Theraclone can;
negotiate more favorable terms with third-party collaborators, licensees, group purchasing organizations and other large customers; and
take advantage of acquisitions or other opportunities more readily than Theraclone can.

Because of these and other potential disadvantages, Theraclone may be unable to compete effectively with these competitors. All of Theraclone’s product candidates face competition and Theraclone expects that competition in its industry will continue to be intense.

Theraclone faces potential product liability exposure, and if successful claims are brought against Theraclone, it may incur substantial liability for a product candidate and may have to limit such product candidate’s commercialization.

The use of Theraclone’s product candidates in clinical trials and the sale of any products for which Theraclone obtains marketing approval expose Theraclone to the risk of product liability claims. Product liability claims might be brought against Theraclone by consumers, health care providers, pharmaceutical companies or others selling Theraclone’s products. If Theraclone cannot successfully defend itself against these claims, Theraclone will incur substantial liabilities. Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, product liability claims may result in:

decreased demand for Theraclone’s product candidates;
impairment of Theraclone’s business reputation;
withdrawal of clinical trial participants;
costs of related litigation;
substantial monetary awards to patients or other claimants;
loss of revenues; and
inability to commercialize Theraclone’s product candidates.

Theraclone’s product liability insurers may not reimburse Theraclone, or Theraclone’s insurance coverage may not be sufficient to reimburse Theraclone, for any or all expenses or losses Theraclone may suffer. Moreover, insurance coverage is becoming increasingly expensive and, in the future, Theraclone may be unable to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or in amounts designed to protect Theraclone against losses due to liability. Theraclone intends to expand its insurance coverage to include the sale of commercial products if Theraclone obtains marketing approval for its product candidates in development, but Theraclone may be unable to obtain commercially reasonable product liability insurance for any products

67


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

approved for marketing. On occasion, large judgments have been awarded in class action lawsuits based on products that had unanticipated side effects. A successful product liability claim or series of claims brought against Theraclone that exceeds its insurance limits would harm its business.

If Theraclone uses biological and hazardous materials in a manner that causes contamination or injury or violates laws, Theraclone may be liable for damages.

Theraclone’s research and development activities and clinical trials involve the use of potentially harmful biological materials, as well as hazardous materials and chemicals. Theraclone cannot completely eliminate the risk of accidental contamination or injury from the distribution, use, storage, handling, or disposal of these materials. In the event of contamination or injury, Theraclone could be held liable for damages that result, and any liability could exceed its available financial resources. Theraclone, its collaborative partners, the third parties that conduct clinical trials on its behalf, and its third-party manufacturers are subject to federal, state, local or foreign laws and regulations governing the use, storage, handling, and disposal of these materials and waste products. The cost of compliance with these laws and regulations could be significant. The failure to comply with any of these laws and regulations could result in significant fines and work stoppages.

If Theraclone’s facility incurs damage or if power is lost for a significant length of time, Theraclone’s business would be harmed.

Theraclone stores research materials, donor samples, preclinical and clinical data at its facility in Seattle, Washington. Although duplicate copies of most critical electronic data are secured off site, any loss of data could result in significant delays in its operations. Theraclone’s landlord has informed Theraclone that it plans to undertake a major remodel of the building where Theraclone leases its facility. If Theraclone’s facility incurs damage, or power is lost for a significant time, or there are significant vibration or other construction related impacts, Theraclone’s business could be harmed.

Theraclone’s internal computer systems, or those used by its clinical investigators, CROs or other contractors or consultants, may fail or suffer security breaches, which could result in a material disruption of development programs for Theraclone’s product candidates.

Theraclone relies on information technology systems to keep financial records, maintain laboratory and corporate records, communicate with staff and external parties and operate other critical functions. Any significant degradation or failure of Theraclone’s computer systems could cause it to inaccurately calculate or lose its data. Despite the implementation of security measures, Theraclone’s internal computer systems and those used by its clinical investigators, CROs, and other contractors and consultants are vulnerable to damage from computer viruses, unauthorized access, natural disasters, terrorism, war, and telecommunication and electrical failures. The techniques that could be used by criminal elements or foreign governments to attack these computer systems are sophisticated, change frequently and may originate from less regulated and remote areas of the world. While Theraclone has not experienced any such system failure, theft of information, accident or security breach to date, if such an event were to occur and cause interruptions in its operations, it could result in a material disruption of Theraclone’s clinical development activities. For example, the loss of clinical trial data from ongoing or future clinical trials could result in delays in regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase costs to recover or reproduce the data. To the extent that any disruption, theft of information, or security breach were to result in a loss of or damage to data or applications, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, Theraclone could incur liability and the clinical development and the future development of its product candidates could be delayed.

68


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation contains “forward-looking statements” of PharmAthene within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which is applicable to PharmAthene, but not Theraclone, because PharmAthene, unlike Theraclone, is a public company subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or Exchange Act. For this purpose, any statements contained herein regarding PharmAthene, other than statements of historical fact, may be forward-looking statements under the provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Forward-looking statements in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation include those referring to the potential for the generation of value as a result of the proposed merger, including the ability to leverage funding sources, potential for revenue, and potential for growth. PharmAthene disclaims any intent or obligation to update these forward-looking statements. Risks and uncertainties include, among others, failure to obtain necessary stockholder approval for the proposed merger with Theraclone and the matters related thereto; failure of either party to meet the conditions to closing of the transaction; delays in completing the transaction and the risk that the transaction may not be completed at all; failure to realize the anticipated benefits from the transaction or delay in realization thereof; the businesses of PharmAthene and Theraclone may not be combined successfully, or such combination may take longer, be more difficult, time-consuming or costly to accomplish than expected; operating costs and business disruption during the pendency of and following the transaction, including adverse effects on employee retention and on business relationships with third parties; the combined company’s need for and ability to obtain additional financing; risk associated with the reliability of the results of the studies relating to human safety and possible adverse effects resulting from the administration of the combined company’s product candidates; unexpected funding delays and/or reductions or elimination of U.S. government funding for one or more of the combined company’s development programs; the award of government contracts to competitors; unforeseen safety issues; unexpected determinations that these product candidates prove not to be effective and/or capable of being marketed as products; as well as risks detailed from time to time in PharmAthene’s Form 10-K or Form 10-Q under the caption “Risk Factors” and in its other reports filed with the SEC. In particular, in its May 2013 decision, the Delaware Supreme Court reversed the remedy ordered by the Delaware Court of Chancery and remanded the issue of a remedy back to the trial court for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court’s opinion. As a result, there can be no assurance that the Delaware Chancery Court will issue a remedy that provides PharmAthene with a financial interest in ArestvyrTM and related products or any remedy. Furthermore, there is significant uncertainty regarding the level and timing of sales of ArestvyrTM and when and whether it will be approved by the U.S. FDA and corresponding health agencies around the world. So even if the Delaware Court of Chancery does award PharmAthene a remedy that provides PharmAthene monies related to sales or profit of ArestvyrTM, PharmAthene cannot predict with certainty if or when SIGA will begin recognizing profit on the sale thereof and there can be no assurance that any profits received by SIGA and paid to PharmAthene will be significant. In addition, significant additional research work, non-clinical animal studies, clinical trials, and manufacturing development work remain to be done with respect to PharmAthene’s product candidates. At this point there can be no assurance that any of these product candidates will be shown to be safe and effective and approved by regulatory authorities for use in humans.

In addition, any statements contained herein regarding Theraclone, other than statements of historical fact, should be considered forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical facts, including statements preceded by, followed by, or that include the words “will,” “potential,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “expect,” “estimate,” “could,” “may,” “should” or similar statements are forward-looking statements. Such statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These forward-looking statements are found at various places throughout this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation and relate to a variety of matters, including but not limited to:

the timing and anticipated completion of the proposed merger;
the expected benefits of and potential value created by the proposed merger for the stockholders of PharmAthene and Theraclone;

69


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the amount of cash and cash equivalents that will be available to fund the combined company’s business after the merger and the length of time that the combined company anticipates such cash and cash equivalents will be available to fund the combined company’s operating plan after the merger;
the likelihood of the satisfaction of certain conditions to completion of the merger and whether and when the merger will be completed;
the potential discovery of additional product candidates and the development, commercialization and expected benefit of current product candidates;
the expected timing and results of preclinical and clinical trials;
PharmAthene’s and Theraclone’s respective results of operations, financial condition and businesses and their respective objectives, plans and expectations;
information about the combined company and the expected impact of the proposed merger on the combined company and its future business, operating results and financial condition; and
other statements that are not purely statements of historical fact.

These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including the risks described in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation under the section entitled “RISK FACTORS” that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied or projected by, the forward-looking information and statements in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. Further, these statements are based upon the current beliefs and expectations of the management of PharmAthene and Theraclone and are subject to a number of factors that could cause actual outcomes and results to be materially different from those projected or anticipated. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements which speak only as of the date hereof. Except to the extent required by applicable law or regulation, neither PharmAthene nor Theraclone undertakes any obligation to update or publish revised forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or the date of the forward-looking statements or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

70


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MARKET AND INDUSTRY DATA

Information and management estimates contained in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation concerning the biotechnology industry, including general expectations and market position and market opportunity, are based on publicly available information, such as clinical studies, academic research reports and other research reports, as well as information from industry reports provided by third-party sources, such as the American Journal of Transplantation, British Medical Journal, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nation Cancer Institute, National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Institute of Health, Global Data, Global Industry Analysts, Global Observatory on Donation & Transplantation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center — Center for Biosecurity, Visiongain and World Health Organization. The management estimates are also derived from Theraclone’s internal research, using assumptions made by Theraclone that it believes to be reasonable and Theraclone’s knowledge of the industry and markets in which Theraclone operates and expects to compete. None of the sources cited in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation have consented to the inclusion of any data from its reports, nor have PharmAthene or Theraclone sought their consent. Theraclone’s internal research has not been verified by any independent source, and Theraclone has not independently verified any third-party information. In addition, while Theraclone believes the market position and market opportunity information included in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation is generally reliable, such information is inherently imprecise. Such data involves risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various factors, including those discussed in the section entitled “RISK FACTORS.”

“Protexia,” “SparVax” and “Valortim” and are some of PharmAthene’s trademarks used in this prospectus. “I STAR” is one of Theraclone’s trademarks used in this prospectus. Other trademarks appearing in this prospectus, including “Arestvyr,” “BioThrax,” “Cialis,” “Cipro,” “Cytogam,” “Cytotect,” “Flumadine,” “Relenza,” “Symmetrel” and “Tamiflu,” are the property of their respective holders. Solely for convenience, these and other trademarks, trade names and service marks referred to in this prospectus appear without the , š and SM symbols, but those references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that PharmAthene, Theraclone or the owners of such trademarks will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, their rights to these trademarks and trade names.

71


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

THE SPECIAL MEETING OF PHARMATHENE STOCKHOLDERS

General

This proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation is being furnished to PharmAthene stockholders on or about            , 2013. PharmAthene is sending this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation to its stockholders in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the PharmAthene Board of Directors for use at the PharmAthene special meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the meeting.

Date, Time and Place

The special meeting of PharmAthene stockholders will be held at     , local time, on            , 2013, at Dentons US LLP’s office located at 1301 K Street, NW, East Tower, Sixth Floor, Washington, DC 20005.

Purposes of the PharmAthene Special Meeting

(1) To consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the issuance of PharmAthene common stock in the merger contemplated by the Merger Agreement, a copy of which is attached as Annex A to the proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation accompanying this notice;
(2) To consider and vote upon a proposal to approve an amendment to PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of common stock that PharmAthene may issue;
(3) To elect nine persons to serve as directors until PharmAthene’s next annual meeting of stockholders or until their respective successors are elected and qualified;
(4) To approve an amendment to PharmAthene’s Bylaws to require, for a period to expire no later than July 31, 2015, the approval of at least 66 2/3% of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors to remove Clifford J. Stocks, the expected Chief Executive Officer of the combined company; and
(5) To consider and vote upon a proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of any of the proposals.

PharmAthene stockholders also will consider and act on any other matters as may properly come before the PharmAthene special meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the meeting, including any procedural matters incident to the conduct of the meeting.

Recommendations of the PharmAthene Board of Directors

The PharmAthene Board of Directors has determined and believes that the merger and all related transactions, including the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock in the merger, is advisable, fair to, and in the best interests of PharmAthene and its stockholders and has unanimously approved each of the proposals as follows:

The PharmAthene Board of Directors unanimously recommends that PharmAthene stockholders vote “FOR” PharmAthene Proposal No. 1 to approve the issuance of PharmAthene common stock in the merger contemplated by the Merger Agreement, a copy of which is attached as Annex A to the proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation;
The PharmAthene Board of Directors unanimously recommends that PharmAthene stockholders vote “FOR” PharmAthene Proposal No. 2 to approve an amendment to PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of common stock that PharmAthene may issue;
The PharmAthene Board of Directors unanimously recommends that PharmAthene stockholders vote “FOR” each of the nominees for director named in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation under Proposal No. 3 to serve as directors until PharmAthene’s next annual meeting of stockholders or until their respective successors are elected and qualified;
The PharmAthene Board of Directors unanimously recommends that PharmAthene stockholders vote “FOR” PharmAthene Proposal No. 4 to approve an amendment to PharmAthene’s Bylaws to require, for a period to expire no later than July 31, 2015, the approval of at least 66 2/3% of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors to remove Clifford J. Stocks, the expected Chief Executive Officer of the combined company; and

72


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The PharmAthene Board of Directors unanimously recommends that PharmAthene stockholders vote “FOR” PharmAthene Proposal No. 5 to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to approve any one or more of the proposals.

Record Date and Voting Power

The close of business on            , 2013 has been fixed as the record date for determination of PharmAthene stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the PharmAthene special meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the meeting. Only holders of record of PharmAthene common stock at the close of business on the record date are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the special meeting. At the close of business on the record date, PharmAthene had      shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share of PharmAthene common stock entitles the holder thereof to one vote on each matter submitted for stockholder approval. See the section entitled “Principal Stockholders of PharmAthene” for information regarding persons known to management of PharmAthene to be the beneficial owners of more than five percent of the outstanding shares of PharmAthene common stock.

Voting and Revocation of Proxies

The proxy accompanying this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation is solicited on behalf of the PharmAthene Board of Directors for use at the PharmAthene special meeting. If you are a PharmAthene stockholder of record as of the record date for the PharmAthene special meeting, you may vote in person at the PharmAthene special meeting or vote by proxy over the Internet, by telephone or by using the enclosed proxy card. Whether or not you plan to attend the PharmAthene special meeting, PharmAthene urges you to vote by proxy to ensure your vote is counted. You still may attend the PharmAthene special meeting and vote in person if you already have voted by proxy.

PharmAthene stockholders that hold shares in a brokerage account or by another nominee are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and will receive instructions from such nominee that must be followed in order to vote shares at the PharmAthene special meeting. Stockholders that hold their shares in “street name” and that wish to attend and vote in person at the PharmAthene special meeting must contact their broker, bank or other nominee to obtain evidence of ownership of PharmAthene common stock, such as a legal proxy, as of the record date for the special meeting. Stockholders that hold PharmAthene shares in “street name” may have their shares voted by their bank, broker or other nominee even if they do not attend the PharmAthene special meeting, but only with respect to “routine” proposals. For any non-routine matters, such as the proposals in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation, brokers, banks or other nominees cannot vote shares without specific instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares. If any PharmAthene stockholder fails to provide instructions with respect to these proposals, the stockholder’s broker, bank or other nominee must deliver a proxy card to PharmAthene expressly indicating that it is NOT voting the beneficial holder’s shares, which is referred to as a “broker non-vote.” Broker non-votes will not count for purposes of determining the number of votes cast. A beneficial owner of PharmAthene common stock that holds shares in “street name” must follow directions received from the bank, broker or other nominee that holds the shares to change its voting instructions.

All properly executed proxies that are not revoked will be voted at the PharmAthene special meeting and at any adjournments or postponements of the meeting in accordance with the instructions contained in the proxy. If a holder of PharmAthene common stock executes and returns a proxy and does not specify otherwise, the shares represented by that proxy will be voted “FOR” each of the five proposals. Any PharmAthene stockholder of record voting by proxy, other than those stockholders who have executed the PharmAthene Voting Agreement, has the right to revoke the proxy at any time before the polls close at the PharmAthene special meeting by sending a written notice stating that it would like to revoke its proxy to the corporate secretary of PharmAthene, by voting again or by providing a duly executed proxy card bearing a later date than the proxy being revoked or by attending the PharmAthene special meeting and voting in person. Attendance alone at the PharmAthene special meeting will not revoke a proxy.

73


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Quorum and Required Vote

A quorum is the number of shares that must be represented in person or by proxy in order for business to be transacted at the PharmAthene special meeting. A quorum will be present at the Meeting if holders of a majority of the shares of PharmAthene’s common stock entitled to vote at the PharmAthene special meeting are present in person or by proxy. Abstentions will count as present for the purpose of establishing a quorum, while broker non-votes will not. If a quorum is not present or represented by proxy, the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote at the PharmAthene special meeting who are present in person or represented by proxy may adjourn the PharmAthene special meeting to another date.

A description of the vote required to approve each proposal being submitted to a vote of PharmAthene stockholders is included with the description of each proposal. If shares are held in “street name” and stockholders holding such shares do not direct their brokers how to vote with respect to any of the proposals, their brokers may not exercise discretion and may not vote their shares on that proposal. For purposes of Proposal Nos. 1 through 5, broker non-votes are considered to be shares represented by proxy at the PharmAthene special meeting but are not considered to be shares “entitled to vote” or “votes cast” at the meeting. As such, a broker non-vote will not be counted as a vote “For” or “Withheld” with respect to Proposal No. 3 or a vote “For” or “Against” Proposal Nos. 1, 4 and 5 and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of Proposal Nos. 1, 3, 4, and 5. Broker non-votes will have the effect of a vote “Against” Proposal No. 2. Proxies marked “Abstain” will be counted in determining the total number of shares “entitled to vote” or “votes cast” on each of the proposals being submitted to a vote of PharmAthene stockholders and will have the effect of a vote “Against” a proposal or a “Withheld” vote.

Concurrently and in connection with the execution of the Merger Agreement, certain of PharmAthene’s stockholders, who in the aggregate beneficially own approximately 7.5% of the outstanding shares of PharmAthene common stock, entered into the PharmAthene Voting Agreement, pursuant to which each stockholder agreed to vote its shares of PharmAthene common stock in furtherance of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and against any amendment of PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws or any other proposal or transaction, the effect of which amendment or other proposal is to delay, impair, prevent or nullify the merger or the transaction contemplated by the Merger Agreement. In addition, each of these stockholders granted Theraclone an irrevocable proxy to vote their respective shares of PharmAthene common stock in accordance with the PharmAthene Voting Agreement.

Solicitation of Proxies

In addition to solicitation by mail, the directors, officers, employees and agents of PharmAthene may solicit proxies from PharmAthene stockholders by personal interview, telephone, telegram or other electronic means. PharmAthene will bear the costs of the solicitation of proxies by PharmAthene from PharmAthene stockholders. Arrangements also will be made with brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries who are record holders of PharmAthene common stock for the forwarding of solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of PharmAthene common stock. PharmAthene will reimburse these brokers, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for the reasonable out-of-pocket expenses they incur in connection with the forwarding of solicitation materials. PharmAthene has retained The Proxy Advisory Group, a proxy solicitation firm, to assist in the solicitation of proxies for the matters being submitted to PharmAthene stockholders for a fee of approximately $16,500.

Other Matters

As of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation, the PharmAthene Board of Directors does not know of any business to be represented at the PharmAthene special meeting other than as set forth in the notice accompanying this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation. If any other matters should properly come before the PharmAthene special meeting, or any adjournment or postponement of the PharmAthene special meeting it is intended that the shares represented by proxies will be voted with respect to such matters in accordance with the judgment of the person voting the proxies.

74


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MATTERS BEING SUBMITTED TO A VOTE OF PHARMATHENE STOCKHOLDERS

The following matters are being submitted to a vote of PharmAthene stockholders:

(1) To consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the issuance of PharmAthene common stock in the merger contemplated by the Merger Agreement, a copy of which is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation;
(2) To consider and vote upon a proposal to approve an amendment to PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of common stock that PharmAthene may issue;
(3) To elect nine persons to serve as directors until PharmAthene’s next annual meeting of stockholders or until their respective successors are elected and qualified;
(4) To approve an amendment to PharmAthene’s Bylaws to require, for a period to expire no later than July 31, 2015, the approval of at least 66 2/3% of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors to remove Clifford J. Stocks, the expected Chief Executive Officer of the combined company; and
(5) To consider and vote upon a proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of any of the proposals.

PharmAthene Proposal No. 1 — The Issuance of Shares of PharmAthene Common Stock in the Merger

At the PharmAthene special meeting, PharmAthene stockholders will be asked to approve the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock in the merger. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, upon completion of the merger, Theraclone stockholders will have the right to receive, for each share of Theraclone capital stock they hold, that number of shares of PharmAthene common stock, if any, as determined pursuant to the Exchange Ratio described in the Merger Agreement and in the section entitled “THE MERGER AGREEMENT — Merger Consideration.”

Upon completion of the merger, the PharmAthene security holders will own 50% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, and Theraclone security holders will own 50% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, in each case, on an as converted and fully diluted basis but excluding PharmAthene warrants and options with an exercise price of more than $2.50 per share. Based on the number of outstanding securities of each company as of September 3, 2013, (i) if no PharmAthene or Theraclone options or warrants are exercised prior to the completion of the merger, PharmAthene and Theraclone security holders would own, respectively, approximately 54.1% and 45.9% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the combined company and (ii) if PharmAthene warrants and options with an exercise price of more than $2.50 per share are exercised, to the extent such exercises occur, PharmAthene and Theraclone security holders could own, respectively, between approximately 51.5% and 50.0% and 48.5% and 50.0% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, on a fully diluted basis. If the merger had been completed on            , 2013, the record date for the PharmAthene special meeting, an aggregate of approximately      million shares of PharmAthene common stock would have been issuable to Theraclone stockholders upon completion of the merger. PharmAthene stockholder approval of this Proposal No. 1 is required as a condition to the merger; accordingly, even if PharmAthene stockholders approve the other proposals, the merger will not be effected unless this Proposal No. 1 is also approved.

PharmAthene’s Board of Directors believes that the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock in the merger is in the best interests of PharmAthene and its stockholders. If PharmAthene’s stockholders do not approve this Proposal No. 1, the merger may not be effected and PharmAthene would be required to seek other strategic opportunities to deliver stockholder value.

The terms of, reasons for and other aspects of the Merger Agreement, the merger and the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock in the merger are described in detail in the other sections of this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation. The full text of the Merger Agreement is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus/written consent as Annex A.

75


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Vote Required; Recommendation of the PharmAthene Board of Directors

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of PharmAthene common stock entitled to vote on the proposal and present in person or represented by proxy, is required for approval of PharmAthene Proposal No. 1.

A failure to vote by proxy or in person at the PharmAthene special meeting or a “broker non-vote” will have no effect on the outcome of PharmAthene Proposal No. 1. For purposes of the vote on this PharmAthene Proposal No. 1, an abstention will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” such proposal.

The PharmAthene Board of Directors unanimously recommends that PharmAthene stockholders vote “FOR” PharmAthene’s Proposal No. 1 to approve the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock in the merger.

PharmAthene Proposal No. 2 — Approval of an Amendment to PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation to Increase the Number of Shares of Common Stock That PharmAthene May Issue

At the PharmAthene special meeting, PharmAthene stockholders will be asked to approve an amendment to PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of common stock that PharmAthene is able to issue. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, upon completion of the merger, Theraclone stockholders will have the right to receive, for each share of Theraclone common stock they hold, that number of shares of PharmAthene common stock, as determined pursuant to the Exchange Ratio described in the Merger Agreement and in the section entitled “THE MERGER AGREEMENT — Merger Consideration.”

To enable PharmAthene to effect the merger, PharmAthene’s Board of Directors has recommended that the stockholders grant authority to PharmAthene’s Board of Directors to effect an increase in the number of authorized shares of PharmAthene’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, by 75,000,000 shares to a total of 175,000,000. PharmAthene expects to issue, or reserve for issuance, up to 60,316,126 shares of common stock in the merger, but currently has only 100,000,000 shares of common stock authorized with      shares outstanding as of the record date. PharmAthene stockholder approval of this Proposal No. 2 is required as a condition to the merger; accordingly, even if PharmAthene stockholders approve the other proposals, the merger will not be effected unless this Proposal No. 2 is also approved.

PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation currently authorizes PharmAthene to issue 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share. On July 31, 2013, PharmAthene’s Board of Directors approved an amendment to PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation that would increase the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance from 100,000,000 to 175,000,000, subject to approval by PharmAthene’s stockholders at the PharmAthene special meeting. The text of the proposed amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation would be as follows:

“Article FOURTH of the Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows”

“FOURTH:  The total number of shares of all classes of capital stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is 176,000,000 of which 175,000,000 shares shall be Common Stock of the par value of $0.0001 per share and 1,000,000 shares shall be Preferred Stock of the par value of $0.0001 per share.

A. Preferred Stock.  The Board of Directors is expressly granted authority to issue shares of the Preferred Stock, in one or more series, and to fix for each such series such voting powers, full or limited, and such designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights and such qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof as shall be stated and expressed in the resolution or resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors providing for the issue of such series, a Preferred Stock Designation, and as may be permitted by the GCL. The number of authorized shares of Preferred Stock may be increased or decreased (but not below the number of shares thereof then outstanding) by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of all of the then outstanding shares of the capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class, without a separate vote of the holders of the Preferred Stock, or any series thereof, unless a vote of any such holders is required pursuant to any Preferred Stock Designation.

76


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

B. Common Stock.  Except as otherwise required by law or as otherwise provided in any Preferred Stock Designation, the holders of the Common Stock shall exclusively possess all voting power and each share of Common Stock shall have one vote.”

Assuming stockholder approval of PharmAthene Proposal No. 2, then following the filing of the Certificate of Amendment with the Delaware Secretary of State, in substantially the form attached hereto as Annex H, the total number of authorized shares of all classes of PharmAthene’s capital stock would be 176,000,000, consisting of 175,000,000 shares of common stock and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock. In that case, based on the number of outstanding PharmAthene and Theraclone securities as of September 3, 2013 and (i) without considering the issuance of PharmAthene securities in the merger, 52,310,913 shares of common stock would be outstanding and 11,616,461 shares of common stock would be issuable upon exercise of outstanding PharmAthene warrants and options and (ii) including the issuance of PharmAthene securities in the merger, 96,641,101 shares of common stock would be outstanding and 27,602,399 shares of common stock would be issuable upon exercise of outstanding PharmAthene and Theraclone warrants and options.

While PharmAthene is seeking separate stockholder approval of the increase in authorized shares of common stock in order to issue PharmAthene common stock in the merger, the increase also gives PharmAthene, on a post-merger basis, needed and appropriate flexibility to issue shares for future corporate and financing needs. The newly authorized shares of common stock may be issued by the combined company’s Board of Directors in its discretion, subject to any further stockholder action required in the case of any particular issuance, including under PharmAthene’s organizational documents, applicable law, agreements or contracts, regulatory authorities, and the rules of the NYSE MKT. The shares of common stock would be issuable for any proper corporate purpose, including without limitation, in the merger, in future capital raising transactions of equity or convertible debt securities, or upon exercise of currently outstanding warrants, upon future acquisitions or other investment opportunities, in connection with stock dividends, or under current or future equity compensation plans.

PharmAthene’s Board of Directors believes that the increase in the number of shares of authorized common stock is in the best interests of PharmAthene and its stockholders. If PharmAthene’s stockholders do not approve this Proposal No. 2, the merger may not be effected and PharmAthene would be required to seek other strategic opportunities to deliver stockholder value.

The additional 75,000,000 authorized shares of common stock will have rights identical to PharmAthene’s currently authorized and outstanding shares of common stock. Accordingly, stockholder approval of PharmAthene Proposal No. 2 will not affect any rights of PharmAthene stockholders and par value will remain unchanged at $0.0001 per share. However, as PharmAthene intends to issue up to an estimated 60,316,126 shares of common stock in the merger, PharmAthene stockholders will experience immediate and significant dilution. See the section entitled “RISK FACTORS — Risks Related to the Proposed Merger.”

Vote Required; Recommendation of the PharmAthene Board of Directors

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the PharmAthene common stock outstanding and entitled to vote on the proposal, is required for approval of PharmAthene Proposal No. 2.

A failure to vote by proxy or in person at the PharmAthene special meeting or a “broker non-vote” will have the effect of a vote “AGAINST” PharmAthene Proposal No. 2. For purposes of the vote on this PharmAthene Proposal No. 2, an abstention will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” such proposal.

The PharmAthene Board of Directors unanimously recommends that PharmAthene stockholders vote “FOR” PharmAthene’s Proposal No. 2 to approve an amendment to PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of common stock that PharmAthene may issue.

PharmAthene Proposal No. 3 — Election of Directors

Proposal No. 3 is for the election of nine directors to hold office until PharmAthene’s next annual meeting of stockholders and until their respective successors have been duly elected and qualified. PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation provides that the number of directors of PharmAthene shall be fixed from time to time by PharmAthene’s Board of Directors. The PharmAthene Board of Directors has fixed the number of directors at nine and has nominated and proposes the election of the following nominees as directors:

77


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Mitchel Sayare, Ph.D.
John M. Gill
Steven Gillis, Ph.D.
Wende S. Hutton
Brian A. Markison
Eric I. Richman
Derace L. Schaffer, M.D.
Clifford J. Stocks

Steven Gillis, Ph.D., Wende S. Hutton, Clifford J. Stocks and            are nominees of Theraclone, and Mitchel Sayare, Ph.D., John M. Gill, Brian A. Markison, Eric I. Richman and Derace L. Schaffer, M.D. are nominees of PharmAthene. Certain biographical information about the nominees is set forth below in the section entitled “MANAGEMENT OF THE COMBINED COMPANY.”

Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will vote the proxies received by them “FOR” all of the nominees named above. If any nominee is unable or unwilling to serve as a director at the time of the special meeting, the proxies will be voted for such other nominee(s) as shall be designated by the PharmAthene Board of Directors to fill any vacancy, consistent with the terms of the Board Composition Agreement. PharmAthene has no reason to believe that any nominee will be unable or unwilling to serve if elected as a director.

Vote Required; Recommendation of the PharmAthene Board of Directors

The affirmative vote of the holders of a plurality of the votes cast of the PharmAthene shares of common stock present at the special meeting in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal, is required for the approval of the election of each of the directors.

A failure to vote by proxy or in person at the PharmAthene special meeting or a “broker non-vote” will have no effect on the outcome of PharmAthene Proposal No. 1. For purposes of the vote on this PharmAthene Proposal No. 1, an abstention will have the same effect as a “WITHHOLD” vote.

The PharmAthene Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each of the nominees for director named in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation under Proposal No. 3.

PharmAthene Proposal No. 4 — Amendment to Bylaws Limiting the Ability of the Board of Directors to Remove the Chief Executive Officer

At the PharmAthene special meeting, PharmAthene stockholders will be asked to approve an amendment to Article VII, Section 2 of PharmAthene’s Bylaws limiting the ability of the Board of Directors to remove the Chief Executive Officer. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, Theraclone’s current Chief Executive Officer, Clifford J. Stocks, is expected to serve as the Chief Executive Officer of the combined company. The Merger Agreement obligates PharmAthene to amend its Bylaws to provide that Mr. Stocks may not be removed from his position as Chief Executive Officer of the combined company without the approval of at least 66 2/3% of the Board of Directors, until the earliest of (i) July 31, 2015, (ii) such time as there is a period longer than 30 days in which less than five PharmAthene board designees serve on the PharmAthene Board of Directors, and (iii) the full settlement or final, non-appealable resolution of PharmAthene’s civil action against SIGA, or the SIGA Resolution; provided, however, that, in the event that the SIGA Resolution occurs prior to the first anniversary of the completion of the merger, the SIGA Resolution will be deemed to have occurred on the first anniversary of the closing of the merger.

PharmAthene stockholder approval of this Proposal No. 4 is required as a condition to the merger; accordingly, even if PharmAthene stockholders approve the other proposals, the merger will not be effected unless this Proposal No. 4 is also approved.

78


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Article VII, Section 2 of PharmAthene’s Bylaws currently provides that each officer may be removed at any time, either with or without cause, by the vote of the majority of the entire Board of Directors. The text of the proposed amendment to Article VII, Section 2 of the Bylaws would be as follows:

“Article VII, SECTION 2 of the Bylaws is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

‘SECTION 2. ELECTIONS, TERM AND REMOVAL.  Each officer shall be elected by the Board of Directors and shall hold office for such term, if any, as the Board of Directors shall determine. Any officer may be removed at any time, either with or without cause, by the vote of a majority of the entire Board of Directors; provided that Clifford J. Stocks may not be removed from his position as Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation without the approval of at least 66 2/3% of the Board of Directors, until the earliest of (a) July 31, 2015, (b) such time as there is a period longer than 30 days in which less than five members of the Board of Directors who was a member of the Board of Directors on July 31, 2013 serve on the Corporation’s Board of Directors, and (c) the full settlement or final, non-appealable resolution of the Corporation’s civil action against SIGA Technologies, Inc.; provided, however, that, in the event of that the SIGA Resolution occurs prior to the first anniversary of the completion of the business combination transaction with Theraclone Sciences, Inc., for purposes of this Section 2, the SIGA Resolution will be deemed to have occurred on the first anniversary of the completion of the business combination transaction with Theraclone Sciences, Inc.”

PharmAthene’s Board of Directors believes that this amendment to Article VII, Section 2 of PharmAthene’s Bylaws is in the best interests of PharmAthene and its stockholders. If PharmAthene’s stockholders do not approve this Proposal No. 4, the merger may not be effected and PharmAthene would be required to seek other strategic opportunities to deliver stockholder value.

Vote Required; Recommendation of the PharmAthene Board of Directors

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of PharmAthene common stock entitled to vote on the proposal and present in person or represented by proxy, is required for approval of PharmAthene Proposal No. 4.

A failure to vote by proxy or in person at the PharmAthene special meeting or a “broker non-vote” will have no effect on the outcome of PharmAthene Proposal No. 4. For purposes of the vote on this PharmAthene Proposal No. 4, an abstention will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” such proposal.

The PharmAthene Board of Directors unanimously recommends that PharmAthene stockholders vote “FOR” PharmAthene’s Proposal No. 4 to approve an amendment to PharmAthene’s Bylaws limiting the ability of the Board of Directors to remove the Chief Executive Officer.

PharmAthene Proposal No. 5 — Approval of Possible Adjournment of the PharmAthene Special Meeting

PharmAthene is asking its stockholders to consider and vote upon a proposal to approve one or more adjournments of the PharmAthene special meeting, if necessary or appropriate.

If the number of shares of PharmAthene common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the PharmAthene special meeting voting in favor of each of PharmAthene Proposal Nos. 1 through 4 is insufficient to approve such proposal at the time of the PharmAthene special meeting, then PharmAthene may move to adjourn the PharmAthene special meeting in order to enable the PharmAthene Board of Directors to solicit additional proxies in respect of the proposal. In that event, PharmAthene stockholders will be asked to vote only upon the adjournment proposal, PharmAthene Proposal No. 5, and not on any other proposal.

In this proposal, PharmAthene is asking its stockholders to authorize the holder of any proxy solicited by the PharmAthene Board of Directors to vote in favor of granting discretionary authority to the proxy or attorney-in-fact to adjourn the PharmAthene special meeting one or more times for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies. If PharmAthene stockholders approve this PharmAthene Proposal No. 5, PharmAthene could adjourn the PharmAthene special meeting and any adjourned session of the PharmAthene special meeting and use the additional time to solicit additional proxies, including from PharmAthene stockholders that previously have returned properly executed proxies or authorized a proxy by using the Internet or telephone. Among other things, approval of PharmAthene Proposal No. 5 could mean that, even if

79


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PharmAthene has received proxies representing a sufficient number of votes against the approval of each of PharmAthene Proposal Nos. 1 through 4, any such proposal would be defeated, PharmAthene could adjourn the PharmAthene special meeting without a vote on such proposal and seek to obtain sufficient votes in favor of such proposal to obtain approval of that proposal.

PharmAthene currently does not intend to propose adjournment at the PharmAthene special meeting if there are sufficient votes to approve PharmAthene Proposal Nos. 1 through 4.

Vote Required; Recommendation of the PharmAthene Board of Directors

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of PharmAthene common stock entitled to vote on the proposal and present in person or represented by proxy, is required for approval of PharmAthene Proposal No. 5.

A failure to vote by proxy or in person at the PharmAthene special meeting or a “broker non-vote” will have no effect on the outcome of PharmAthene Proposal No. 5. For purposes of the vote on this PharmAthene Proposal No. 5, an abstention will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” such proposal.

The PharmAthene Board of Directors unanimously recommends that PharmAthene stockholders vote “FOR” PharmAthene Proposal No. 5 to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of PharmAthene Proposal Nos. 1 through 4.

80


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MATTERS TO BE PRESENTED TO THERACLONE’S STOCKHOLDERS

Theraclone Stockholder Action by Written Consent

Theraclone’s Board of Directors is providing this consent solicitation and consent solicitation materials to its stockholders. Theraclone’s stockholders are being asked to execute and deliver the written consent furnished with this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation to (i) approve the merger and adopt and approve the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Certificate of Merger to be filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware referenced in the Merger Agreement, and (ii) approve the conversion of the shares of Theraclone preferred stock into shares of Theraclone common stock on a one-for-one basis.

Shares Entitled to Consent and Consent Required

Only Theraclone stockholders of record at the close of business on            , 2013 will be notified of and be entitled to execute and deliver a written consent. On the record date, the outstanding securities of Theraclone eligible to consent with respect to the proposals consisted of      shares of Theraclone common stock and an aggregate of      shares of Theraclone’s Series A-1 and Series B-1 convertible preferred stock.

Under Theraclone’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, each holder of Theraclone common stock is entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held of record and each holder of Theraclone preferred stock is entitled to one vote for each share of common stock into which such share of preferred stock held of record is convertible.

Approval is required from (i) the holders of at least (a) a majority of the outstanding shares of Theraclone common stock and preferred stock, voting together as a single class on an as-converted-to-common stock basis and (b) a majority of the outstanding shares of the Theraclone preferred stock, voting together as a single class on an as-converted-to-common stock basis for the merger, the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and (ii) holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of Theraclone preferred stock, voting together as a single class, for the conversion of the shares of Theraclone preferred stock into shares of Theraclone common stock on a one-for-one basis.

As of the record date, the directors and executive officers of Theraclone were, in the aggregate, beneficial owners of     % of the outstanding shares of Theraclone common stock on as-converted-to-common stock basis entitled to execute and deliver the written consent. On July 31, 2013, certain of the major stockholders of Theraclone who owned approximately 27,724,939 shares, or approximately 75% of the outstanding shares of Theraclone common stock on as-converted-to-common stock basis, solely in their capacity as Theraclone stockholders, entered into the Theraclone Voting Agreement with PharmAthene in connection with the merger.

Submission of Consents

You may consent to the proposal with respect to your shares by completing and signing the written consent furnished with this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation and returning it to Theraclone on or before            , 2013, the date Theraclone’s Board of Directors has set as the targeted final date for receipt of written consents. Theraclone reserves the right to extend the final date for receipt of written consents beyond             , 2013 in the event that consents approving the merger and adopting and approving the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby have not been obtained by that date from holders of a sufficient number of shares of Theraclone common stock and Theraclone preferred stock to satisfy the conditions to the merger. Any such extension may be made without notice to stockholders. Once all conditions to the merger have been satisfied or waived, the consent solicitation will conclude.

If you hold shares of Theraclone common stock or preferred stock as of the record date and you wish to give your written consent, you must complete the enclosed written consent, date and sign it, and promptly return it to Theraclone. Once you have completed, dated and signed the written consent, you may deliver it to Theraclone by faxing it to Theraclone’s legal counsel, Fenwick & West LLP, Attention: Ellen Welichko, at (206) 389-4511, by emailing a .pdf copy of your written consent to ewelichko@fenwick.com, or by mailing your written consent to Fenwick & West LLP at 1191 Second Avenue, 10th Floor, Seattle, Washington 98101, Attention: Ellen Welichko.

81


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executing Consents; Revocation of Consents

With respect to each proposal for which the shares of Theraclone common stock and preferred stock that you hold allow you to give consent, you may execute a written consent to approve the proposal (which is equivalent to a vote for the proposal) or disapprove the proposal (which is equivalent to a vote against the proposal). If you do not return your written consent, it will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal. If you are a record holder and you return a signed written consent without indicating your decision on the proposal, you will have given your consent to approve the merger and adopt and approve the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.

Your consent to the proposal may be changed or revoked at any time before the consents of a sufficient number of shares to approve and adopt such proposal have been received by Theraclone’s legal counsel, Fenwick & West LLP, and filed with Theraclone’s corporate secretary. If you wish to change or revoke a previously delivered consent before that time, you may do so by delivering a notice of revocation to Theraclone’s legal counsel, Fenwick & West LLP, in the method specified above or by delivering a new written consent with a later date.

Solicitation of Consents; Expense

The expense of preparing, printing and mailing these consent solicitation materials is being borne by Theraclone. Theraclone’s officers and employees may solicit consents by telephone and personally, in addition to solicitation by mail. These persons will receive their regular salaries but no special compensation for soliciting consents.

Recommendation of the Theraclone Board

The Theraclone Board of Directors recommends that Theraclone stockholders approve the merger and adopt and approve the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby by executing and delivering the written consent furnished with this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation. Theraclone’s Board of Directors believes the merger consideration to Theraclone’s stockholders is fair, advisable and in the best interests of Theraclone and its stockholders. Theraclone’s management and its Board of Directors, after careful study and evaluation of the economic, financial, legal and other factors, also believe that the merger could provide the combined company with increased opportunity for expansion of its business, which in turn should benefit Theraclone’s stockholders who become stockholders of PharmAthene. See the section entitled “THE MERGER — Theraclone’s Reasons for the Merger.”

Voting and Other Agreements

Concurrently with and as a condition to PharmAthene’s and Theraclone’s entering into the Merger Agreement, on July 31, 2013, certain stockholders, directors and officers of Theraclone, holding, in the aggregate, approximately 75% of the outstanding shares of Theraclone capital stock, entered into the Theraclone Voting Agreement whereby they have agreed to vote their Theraclone shares in favor of the merger and refrain from selling any of the PharmAthene common stock they receive in the merger for six months following the Effective Time of the merger. For a more detailed discussion of these stockholder agreements see the sections entitled “VOTING AND OTHER AGREEMENTS — Voting and Lock-up Agreements” and “VOTING AND OTHER AGREEMENTS — Theraclone Post-Closing Lock-up Agreement.”

82


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

THE MERGER

This section and the section entitled “The Merger Agreement” describe the material aspects of the merger, including the Merger Agreement. While PharmAthene and Theraclone believe that this description covers the material terms of the merger and the Merger Agreement, it may not contain all of the information that is important to you. You should read carefully this entire proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation for a more complete understanding of the merger and the Merger Agreement, including the attached Annexes, and the other documents to which you are referred herein. See the section entitled “Where You Can Find Additional Information.”

General

The Merger Agreement provides that, at the Effective Time, Merger Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of PharmAthene that was formed for the purpose of the merger, will merge with and into Theraclone, with Theraclone surviving the merger and becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of PharmAthene. After the merger, PharmAthene and its wholly owned subsidiary, Theraclone, will operate as a combined company.

At the Effective Time:

each share of Theraclone common stock outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time will automatically be converted into the right to receive a number of shares of PharmAthene common stock equal to the quotient obtained by dividing the fully diluted equity (as defined below) of PharmAthene by the fully diluted equity of Theraclone, less a pro rata share of PharmAthene common stock representing five percent of the merger consideration issuable to the stockholders of Theraclone, or the Escrow Shares, which will be held in escrow pursuant to the terms of the escrow agreement, as described in further detail below, except that holders of Theraclone common stock will receive cash in lieu of fractional shares;
each option to purchase shares of Theraclone common stock outstanding and unexercised immediately prior to the Effective Time will be assumed by PharmAthene and will become an option to purchase that number of shares of the common stock of the combined company equal to the product of (i) the number of Theraclone shares of common stock underlying the option and (ii) the quotient obtained by dividing the fully diluted equity of PharmAthene by the fully diluted equity of Theraclone; and
each warrant to purchase shares of Theraclone capital stock outstanding and not terminated or exercised immediately prior to the Effective Time will be assumed by PharmAthene and will become a warrant to purchase that number of shares of PharmAthene common stock equal to the product of (i) the number of Theraclone shares of capital stock underlying the warrant and (ii) the quotient obtained by dividing the fully diluted equity of PharmAthene by the fully diluted equity of Theraclone.

Fully diluted equity means, with respect to PharmAthene, the total number of shares outstanding of PharmAthene common stock, assuming full conversion or exercise of all then-outstanding options and warrants, which, in each case, have an exercise price less than or equal to $2.50 per share, and convertible securities, and with respect to Theraclone, the total number of shares outstanding of Theraclone common stock, assuming full conversion or exercise of all then-outstanding options and warrants and all convertible securities.

Upon completion of the merger, the PharmAthene security holders will own 50% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, and Theraclone security holders will own 50% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, in each case, on an as converted and fully diluted basis but excluding PharmAthene warrants and options with an exercise price of more than $2.50 per share. Based on the number of outstanding securities of each company as of September 3, 2013, (i) if no PharmAthene or Theraclone options or warrants are exercised prior to the completion of the merger, PharmAthene and Theraclone security holders would own, respectively, approximately 54.1% and 45.9% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the combined company and (ii) if PharmAthene warrants and options with an exercise price of more than $2.50 per share are exercised, to the extent such exercises occur, PharmAthene and Theraclone security holders could own, respectively, between approximately 51.5% and 50.0% and 48.5% and 50.0% of the outstanding equity of the

83


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

combined company, on a fully diluted basis. The Escrow Shares described above, which will serve to secure the Theraclone stockholders’ indemnification obligations under the Merger Agreement, will be deposited with Citibank, N.A., as escrow agent under a separate escrow agreement to be entered into prior to the completion of the Merger. The escrow period will expire nine months from the date of completion of the merger.

The merger is intended to qualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.

PharmAthene stockholders will continue to own their existing shares of PharmAthene common stock after the merger. Each share of PharmAthene common stock will continue to represent one share of PharmAthene common stock, but the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock to Theraclone stockholders in the merger will significantly reduce the percentage ownership of PharmAthene represented by each share of PharmAthene common stock.

The closing of the merger will take place as promptly as practicable after the day on which the last of the conditions to the merger set forth in the Merger Agreement has been satisfied or waived (if permissible), unless PharmAthene and Theraclone agree to a different date. However, because the merger is subject to a number of conditions, neither PharmAthene nor Theraclone can predict exactly when the closing will occur or if it will occur at all. See “THE MERGER AGREEMENT — Conditions to Completion of the Merger” for a more complete description of the conditions that must be satisfied or, if permissible, waived before closing.

Background of the Merger

PharmAthene’s strategic objective has been to become a premier global company specializing in the development and commercialization of prophylactic and therapeutic drugs for defense against biological and chemical threats and emerging infectious diseases. The rapidly changing legal and regulatory landscape governing the approval, manufacture and marketing of biopharmaceutical products, as well as challenges resulting from the U.S. government budget process, have affected the timing of, funding for PharmAthene’s products. PharmAthene has continually reviewed its current and prospective business strategy and prospects for continued growth in the context of these evolving challenges. In the past, as a result of such reviews, PharmAthene has acquired other companies and products, including the biodefense assets of Avecia Biologics Limited, to diversify and expand its product offerings and business. Additionally, PharmAthene set a strategic objective to diversify its pipeline to address emerging infectious diseases.

On June 23, 2011, PharmAthene’s board of directors determined, as part of its regular review of PharmAthene’s business strategy and in light of the above considerations, to engage Leerink’s, as PharmAthene’s exclusive financial advisor to assist PharmAthene in identifying, evaluating and pursuing a broad range of potential strategies to optimize stockholder value. Following Leerink’s engagement, PharmAthene, its Board of Directors, and the Board of Directors’ strategic transaction committee considered and met several times to discuss a number of potential combinations with, or acquisitions of, other companies, including large, mid and small-capitalization biopharmaceutical companies, as well as other forms of strategic alliances.

Building on prior work done by PharmAthene, between June 23, 2011 and July 2013, Leerink and PharmAthene management screened potential candidates world-wide for a broad range of potential strategic transactions and evaluated potential collaborators based on strategic fit, product pipeline synergy and relative values of product lines. During this time, PharmAthene, either directly or through Leerink, contacted approximately 25 potential counterparties regarding a potential strategic transaction. Several of these counterparties executed confidential disclosure agreements with PharmAthene, received confidential information with respect to PharmAthene and its business and conducted due diligence.

One area of high interest to PharmAthene during the portion of the process that involved evaluating potential acquisition targets was products for the treatment or prevention of influenza. These types of products were considered to be a strong fit for PharmAthene due to their potential applications to both commercial and government markets. PharmAthene identified a product candidate which met these criteria being developed by Theraclone. In April 2009, Dr. Jeffrey Jones, then the Director of Business Development of PharmAthene, met with Dr. Matthew Moyle the then Chief Scientific Officer of Theraclone. Subsequently, between April 2011

84


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

and October 2011, representatives of the managements of both PharmAthene and Theraclone had a small number of discussions about their respective businesses and products.

Since Theraclone’s inception, its Board of Directors and management team have been regularly evaluating its business and operations, long-term strategic goals and alternatives, and prospects as an independent company. Theraclone’s Board of Directors and management team have regularly reviewed and assessed trends and conditions impacting Theraclone and its industry, changes in the marketplace and applicable law, the competitive environment and Theraclone’s future prospects. As part of the ongoing review of Theraclone and its position in its industry, Theraclone’s Board of Directors also regularly reviews the strategic alternatives available to Theraclone, including possible strategic combinations, acquisitions and divestitures.

In February 2013, Clifford J. Stocks, Theraclone’s Chief Executive Officer, commenced a process to select a financial advisor to advise Theraclone with respect to a potential business combination.

On February 14, 2013, representatives of Leerink met with representatives of Theraclone at Leerink’s Global Health Care Conference and discussed, in part, a potential transaction involving Theraclone and PharmAthene.

As part of its review of potential strategic alternatives, on March 6, 2013, PharmAthene directed a representative of Leerink to contact a representative of Theraclone.

On March 28, 2013, Mr. Stocks was introduced to Dr. Jones, now PharmAthene’s Senior Director, Corporate Development. Mr. Stocks and Dr. Jones made arrangements to meet together with Eric Richman, PharmAthene’s Chief Executive Officer.

On April 3, 2013, Mr. Richman and Dr. Jones engaged in a telephone conversation with Mr. Stocks, during which Mr. Stocks provided a technical and business overview of Theraclone. During this conversation PharmAthene learned of the status of Theraclone’s influenza program, and the significant progress that had been made in Theraclone’s pipeline, and commercial collaborations Theraclone had entered into regarding lead monoclonal antibodies generated under its I-STAR technology platform.

On April 5, 2013, Theraclone and PharmAthene entered into a confidentiality agreement.

On April 15, 2013, Messrs. Stocks and Richman and Dr. Jones met in person in Washington, DC. During the meeting, the parties discussed the strategic rationale for a potential business combination between PharmAthene and Theraclone. The parties agreed during the meeting to further consider a potential business transaction between the companies and to speak within the coming weeks.

On April 29, 2013, Mr. Stocks provided Mr. Richman with certain information, including a corporate presentation regarding Theraclone for Mr. Richman to present to PharmAthene’s Board of Directors.

On April 29, 2013, Theraclone selected Healthios Capital Partners LLC as its financial advisor to identify, evaluate and assist in pursuing strategic alternatives. From May 2013 through July 2013, Healthios contacted approximately 50 potential counterparties regarding a potential strategic transaction with Theraclone. Several of these counterparties executed confidentiality disclosure agreements with Theraclone and received confidential information regarding Theraclone’s product candidates and technology. During this time, Theraclone’s management and its Board of Directors considered partnering and licensing programs with pharmaceutical companies, in addition to a potential business combination transaction.

On May 6, 2013, PharmAthene provided Theraclone with a non-binding letter of interest regarding a potential merger of the companies. Mr. Stocks conferred initially with Steven Gillis, Ph.D., a member of Theraclone’s Board of Directors, regarding the draft terms in the non-binding letter of interest and thereafter conveyed the contents of the draft terms to the other members of Theraclone’s Board of Directors. Informal discussions about the leadership of a combined PharmAthene/Theraclone also occurred, during which Mr. Richman indicated that he would be open to the possibility that Mr. Stocks would serve as Chief Executive Officer of the combined company.

On May 9, 2013, Messrs. Richman and Stocks discussed the potential business combination transaction and selected May 16, 2013 for a mutual management presentation via teleconference.

85


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

On May 15, 2013, each of PharmAthene and Theraclone agreed to inform Peter A. Patriarca, M.D., Senior Clinical Consultant at Biologics Consulting Group, Inc., and consultant to each of PharmAthene and Theraclone, of the potential business combination transaction to facilitate the diligence with respect to their respective research and development programs and regulatory activities.

On May 16, 2013, management from PharmAthene and Theraclone convened telephonically to present their respective businesses. During this meeting, there were detailed discussions relating to the possible benefits of combining the two companies as well as an extensive discussion regarding PharmAthene’s on-going litigation with SIGA. Virtual data rooms were established to permit both sides to review documents in key areas of their respective businesses.

From May 16 to July 2013, PharmAthene, Theraclone and their respective advisors conducted technical, business, intellectual property and legal due diligence. As part of this mutual diligence process, multiple meetings took place between Theraclone and PharmAthene management and their respective advisors.

Also from May 16, 2013 to July 2013, multiple discussions between Dr. Sayare, Chairman of the Board of PharmAthene, and Dr. Gillis, as well as Mr. Richman and Mr. Stocks were held regarding potential deal structures, financial and business terms, and governance of a proposed merger.

On May 25, 2013, PharmAthene’s outside counsel sent Theraclone and its outside counsel a draft merger agreement. The parties engaged in preliminary negotiations concerning the draft merger agreement.

On May 29, 2013, there were further conversations with scientific and technical personnel of each of PharmAthene and Theraclone regarding regulatory strategy, clinical trial design and the manufacturing of Theraclone’s monoclonal antibodies.

On May 30, 2013, PharmAthene was informed, and on May 31, 2013 PharmAthene informed Theraclone that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had lifted the clinical hold on PharmAthene’s proposed Phase 2 SparVax clinical trial.

On May 30, 2013 a call was held with PharmAthene’s clinical advisor, Dr. James Mond, PharmAthene technical personnel, including Drs. Morges, Jones and Elliott and Mr. Richman and Dr. Peter Patriarca of the Biologics Consulting Group, to discuss Theraclone’s influenza antiviral and the clinical data from the Phase II clinical trial.

On June 5, 2013, an in person due diligence meeting took place in Seattle, Washington at Theraclone’s offices. The meeting was attended by Mr. Richman and Dr. Jones, Linda Chang, Francesca Cook, Wayne Morges, Jordan Karp, Tim Roesing and Arthur Elliott (by phone) of PharmAthene as well as Cliff Stocks, Witold Cieplak, Ph.D., Kristine Swiderek, Ph.D., Russ Hawkinson, and Eleanor Ramos, M.D., of Theraclone along with other Theraclone personnel and representative of the financial advisors to both companies. During this meeting, detailed technical reviews covered both the PharmAthene and Theraclone programs, as well as a facility tour.

From June 6, 2013 through June 12, 2013, PharmAthene’s management interviewed Theraclone’s key opinion leaders for the influenza program, including Penelope Ward, M.D., a third party influenza expert engaged by Theraclone to review clinical data associated with the influenza program. Additionally, discussions were held with key opinion leaders regarding Theraclone’s cytomegalovirus, or CMV, program.

On June 11, 2013, during a regularly scheduled PharmAthene Board of Directors meeting, PharmAthene’s management and Leerink updated the PharmAthene Board of Directors on their progress in evaluating a potential merger with Theraclone. Leerink presented the PharmAthene Board of Directors with an update concerning other strategic alternatives available to PharmAthene. The PharmAthene Board of Directors, after discussions, authorized PharmAthene’s management and financial and legal advisors to continue discussions and negotiations with Theraclone. At the same meeting on June 11, 2013, Steven St. Peter, a member of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors, reminded the PharmAthene Board of Directors that he had formerly been employed as a Managing Director of MPM, which was, directly or through one or more affiliates, a stockholder of Theraclone but that he no longer was affiliated with MPM. He disclosed further to the PharmAthene Board of Directors that he was the Chief Executive Officer of Aratana Pharmaceuticals, Inc., of which MPM and one or more affiliates thereof, is a stockholder. He reminded the PharmAthene Board of

86


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Directors that he did not and would not engage in any conversations with representatives of MPM with respect to a proposed transaction with Theraclone. The PharmAthene Board of Directors determined that Dr. St. Peter’s continued involvement in discussions evaluating the transaction and the financial aspects and business aspects of Theraclone’s operations and strategic alternatives were in the best interest of PharmAthene. Mr. Richman informed the PharmAthene Board of Directors that neither he, Leerink, nor any other representatives of PharmAthene, had had any conversations with MPM relating to the transaction. The PharmAthene Board of Directors directed management to complete diligence and negotiate a merger agreement.

On June 11, 2013, other meetings occurred between PharmAthene scientific and technical personnel, PharmAthene’s outside clinical advisor, and Dr. Ward. A financial due diligence call also occurred on June 11, 2013 attended by Linda Chang, Chief Financial Officer of PharmAthene, representatives of Leerink and Theraclone’s financial advisor, Healthios, Mr. Hawkinson and Mr. Stocks.

From June 17, 2013 through July 30, 2013, with the exception of July 9, 2013 to July 11, 2013, Theraclone and PharmAthene, together with their respective outside legal counsel and financial advisors engaged in negotiations regarding the terms of the merger agreement and the ancillary transaction agreements, including the computation of the exchange ratio, Theraclone’s indemnification obligations, an additional financing by Theraclone’s existing stockholders, non-solicitation provisions, management of the combined company, treatment of stock options and warrants in the merger, employee benefits following the merger, conditions to each party’s obligation to complete the merger, termination rights and termination fees, and representations, warranties and covenants of the parties. Final agreement on these and other issues was reached over the course of numerous discussions involving members of Theraclone and PharmAthene management and their legal teams.

On June 20, 2013, in response to a request by Mr. Richman, Mr. Stocks prepared and delivered to Mr. Richman a summary of certain future milestones associated with Theraclone’s business to be integrated into a presentation by Mr. Richman to PharmAthene’s strategic transactions committee of its Board of Directors.

On July 2, 2013, Dr. Gillis and Dr. Sayare met telephonically to discuss the proposed terms of a merger between the two companies.

On July 8, 2013, PharmAthene’s management and Leerink updated the strategic transactions committee of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors and on their preliminary due diligence reviews of Theraclone, including due diligence findings with respect to the lead products and the benefits of a merger for the stockholders of the PharmAthene. Following this meeting, the strategic transactions committee instructed a representative of Leerink to contact a representative of Theraclone’s financial advisor, Healthios, to renegotiate the exchange ratio for the merger consideration such that, upon the completion of a merger, PharmAthene stockholders would hold sixty percent of the combined company. Mr. Richman also discussed this with Mr. Stocks. After this conversation, Mr. Stocks conferred with Mr. Richman to discuss Theraclone’s response to PharmAthene’s negotiating position. During this meeting, Mr. Stocks informed Mr. Richman that Theraclone would insist that the exchange ratio result in equal ownership of the combined company, consistent with all prior discussions between the two companies. Mr. Stocks then instructed Theraclone’s management team and its advisors to cease working on the transaction while this issue was negotiated. Mr. Richman communicated Theraclone’s position to PharmAthene’s Board of Directors. The PharmAthene Board of Directors instructed management and its advisors to do a full valuation analysis of Theraclone independently and prepare a full comparative analysis.

From July 9, 2013 through July 11, 2013, Messrs. Stocks and Richman reviewed and discussed the terms of the proposed merger, including, among other things, the exchange ratio, and, on July, 11, 2013, Drs. Gillis and Sayare agreed that Dr. Sayare would present Theraclone’s proposal of equal ownership of the combined company to PharmAthene’s Board of Directors at its July 15, 2013 Board of Directors meeting. Also on July 11, 2013, Mr. Stocks instructed Theraclone’s management team and its advisors to re-commence working on the transaction.

87


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

On July 15, 2013, PharmAthene’s Board of Directors of PharmAthene met with Dentons US LLP, outside counsel to PharmAthene. Dentons reviewed and discussed with the PharmAthene Board of Directors members their fiduciary duties in considering and evaluating potential strategic transactions, including the one proposed by Theraclone, discussed potential conflicts of interest and the PharmAthene Board of Directors’ responsibilities with respect thereto.

On July 16, 2013, Mr. Stocks, Mr. Hawkinson, Wende S. Hutton, a member of Theraclone’s Board of Directors, and David Loucks of Healthios Capital Partners LLC met with members of PharmAthene’s management in the corporate offices of PharmAthene to conduct diligence and discuss the proposed terms of a merger. The discussions included corporate governance, management, updates on proposed business and financial terms and the financial strength of the companies. Ms. Hutton proposed that certain members of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors remain on the combined company’s Board of Directors and requested that Eric Richman remain on the combined company’s Board of Directors. She also requested that Linda Chang assist the new management team with the transition.

On July 17, 2013, in response to a request by Mr. Richman, Mr. Stocks prepared and delivered to Mr. Richman a summary of Theraclone’s I-STAR technology, TCN-032 clinical data and commercial positioning, TCN-202 clinical data and commercial positioning, an overview of the collaboration with Pfizer and an overview of Theraclone’s internal early stage pipeline of drug candidates to be integrated into a presentation by Mr. Richman to PharmAthene’s Board of Directors.

On July 18, 2013, Theraclone’s Board of Directors held a special telephonic meeting to discuss extensively the status of the proposed combination transaction with PharmAthene and negotiations related to the merger. At this Theraclone Board of Directors meeting, Theraclone’s management was directed to continue to negotiate and evaluate the transaction with PharmAthene.

PharmAthene’s Board of Directors met during the evening of July 18, 2013 and held a special meeting on July 19, 2013 to discuss extensively the status of the proposed transaction with Theraclone and negotiations related to the proposed merger. The discussions included a final technical diligence report, full valuation analysis as requested on April 29, 2013, updates on the proposed business and financial terms of the merger, including Theraclone’s proposed exchange ratio, which was approved at the meeting, the possibility of providing for contingent value rights tied to the SIGA litigation, the composition of the Board of Directors of the combined company, the companies, respective financial strength and the desire that the existing stockholders of Theraclone invest $4,000,000 of additional capital (that had been previously committed) into Theraclone prior to the consummation of the merger. The PharmAthene Board of Directors provided instructions to its legal and financial advisor with respect to specific negotiating positions relating to the composition of the combined company’s Board of Directors, possible contingent value rights tied to the SIGA litigation, termination fees (including those relating to resolution of the SIGA litigation) and other matters, including executive compensation.

From July 20, 2013 through July 21, 2013, Dr. Gillis, Ms. Hutton and Messrs. Stocks and Loucks convened telephonically to discuss the status of the proposed combination transaction with PharmAthene and negotiations related to the merger.

On July 24, 2013, Messrs. Richman and Stocks extensively negotiated the termination rights and termination fees in the merger agreement.

On July 25, 2013, Messrs. Richman and Stocks and Drs. Gillis and Sayare extensively discussed the board composition of the combined company, including Dr. Sayare’s continued service as chairman of the Board of Directors of PharmAthene following the merger.

On July 28, 2013, PharmAthene proposed that the exchange ratio be modified to exclude certain out-of-the-money derivative securities. Also on July 28, 2013, Theraclone’s Board of Directors held a special telephonic meeting to discuss extensively the status of the proposed combination transaction with PharmAthene and negotiations related to the merger. At this Theraclone Board of Directors meeting, PharmAthene requested changes to the exchange ratio to exclude certain out-of-the-money derivative securities, was extensively discussed and, after such discussion, was determined to be agreeable.

88


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

On July 30, 2013, following the receipt by PharmAthene of the revised draft of the merger agreement from counsel to Theraclone, the strategic transactions committee of the PharmAthene Board of Directors met by telephone and provided direction to management and Leerink to seek specific additional and alternative terms in the merger agreement.

On July 31, 2013, Theraclone’s Board of Directors held a special telephonic meeting to consider the proposed merger between Theraclone and PharmAthene and to vote on the merger agreement and related matters. Mr. Stocks and a representative of Fenwick & West LLP, outside legal counsel to Theraclone, presented an overview of the proposed transaction with PharmAthene. Theraclone’s Board of Directors engaged in extensive discussion regarding the proposed transaction and asked questions of and received answers from, Theraclone’s management and advisors. Following these discussions, Theraclone’s Board of Directors unanimously determined, among other things, that the merger agreement and the proposed merger contemplated thereby were advisable and in the best interests of Theraclone and its stockholders and resolved to recommend that Theraclone’s stockholders approve the proposed merger and all other transactions contemplated thereby.

On July 31, 2013, the PharmAthene Board of Directors held a special telephonic meeting to consider the proposed merger between PharmAthene and Theraclone and to vote on the merger agreement and related agreements. Representatives of Dentons US LLP reminded the members of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors of previous discussions relating to their fiduciary duties in evaluating the merger certain relationships and provided a detailed summary of the terms of the proposed merger agreement and related agreements. Representatives of Dentons and Leerink also responded to questions from members of the PharmAthene Board of Directors. At the meeting, a representative from Leerink delivered certain of its analyses and its opinion to the PharmAthene Board of Directors to the effect that, subject to various assumptions, qualifications and limitations, as of July 31, 2013, the consideration to be paid by PharmAthene in the merger, pursuant to the merger agreement was fair, from a financial point of view to PharmAthene and its stockholders. The written opinion of Leerink is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation as Annex F. Following these discussions and after review and discussion among the members of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors, PharmAthene’s Board of Directors unanimously determined, among other things, that the merger agreement and the proposed merger contemplated thereby were advisable and in the best interest of PharmAthene and its stockholders and resolved to recommend that PharmAthene stockholders approve the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock in connection with the proposed merger and all other actions required or contemplated be taken by the merger agreement.

Also on July 31, 2013, certain Theraclone stockholders executed stockholder agreements and irrevocable proxies with PharmAthene, and certain PharmAthene stockholders executed stockholder agreements and irrevocable proxies with Theraclone. After the close of trading markets on July 31, 2013, Theraclone and PharmAthene executed and delivered to each other the merger agreement.

PharmAthene Reasons for the Merger

In evaluating the merger and the Merger Agreement, the PharmAthene Board of Directors consulted with PharmAthene’s management and legal, financial and other advisors and, in reaching its decision to approve the merger and enter into the Merger Agreement, the PharmAthene Board of Directors considered a number of factors, including the following material factors which the PharmAthene Board of Directors viewed as generally supporting its decision to approve the merger and the Merger Agreement:

Historical and current information concerning PharmAthene’s business, financial performance, financial condition, operations, management, and competitive position, the prospects of PharmAthene and its products, the nature of the biodefense industry generally, including financial projections of PharmAthene under various scenarios and its short- and long-term strategic objectives and the related risks and the belief that the combination of PharmAthene’s and Theraclone’s businesses would create more value for PharmAthene stockholders in the long-term than PharmAthene could create as an independent, stand-alone company.
The viability of strategic alternatives if the proposed merger with Theraclone does not occur, in light of, among other things, PharmAthene’s financial prospects, the likelihood of other business combinations or other strategic transactions and access to the capital needed to continue successful

89


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

operations, and the belief that the proposed merger with Theraclone would provide PharmAthene’s stockholders with a greater potential opportunity to realize a return on their investment than any other alternative reasonably available to PharmAthene and its stockholders.
One of such alternatives, which was rejected as less attractive, was the consideration of a spin-off to PharmAthene stockholders of rights that PharmAthene may have as a result of the SIGA litigation.
Historical and current information concerning Theraclone’s business, financial performance, financial condition, operations and management and the results of a due diligence investigation of Theraclone conducted by PharmAthene’s management and advisors.
The opportunity for PharmAthene’s stockholders to participate in the potential future value of the combined company, including future potential value from Theraclone’s technology and other assets.
Historical and current financial market conditions and stock prices and historical stock prices and trading volumes of PharmAthene common stock.
The factors affecting the business of PharmAthene described in “RISK FACTORS — Risks Related to PharmAthene.”
The Exchange Ratio in the merger, which is intended to result in PharmAthene security holders holding approximately 50% of the outstanding equity of the combined company immediately after completion of the merger on an as converted and fully diluted basis excluding PharmAthene options and warrants with an exercise price greater than $2.50 per share.
The all-stock nature of the merger and the intent that the merger be tax-free to PharmAthene stockholders.
The possible effect of a transaction with Theraclone on PharmAthene’s settlement negotiations with respect to its litigation.
The fiduciary duties of PharmAthene officers and directors to PharmAthene stockholders.
The terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, including, without limitation, the following:
º The structure of the merger and the level of certainty as to the percentage of the total shares of common stock of the combined company that PharmAthene and Theraclone stockholders will own immediately after the merger, which will not be adjusted to reflect changes in the market value of PharmAthene common stock or Theraclone common stock or the amount of net cash of PharmAthene.
º The provisions in the Merger Agreement that limit the ability of PharmAthene to solicit and respond to offers for alternative transactions, but which allow PharmAthene to respond to a bona fide acquisition proposal that the PharmAthene Board of Directors determines is or is reasonably likely to lead to a superior proposal, subject to certain restrictions imposed by the Merger Agreement, which provisions the PharmAthene Board of Directors believes are reasonable under the circumstances.
º The requirement to hold a special meeting of PharmAthene stockholders to vote on the approval of the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock in the merger and other matters described in the section entitled “THE MERGER AGREEMENT” and Stockholder Approval below, even if the PharmAthene Board of Directors subsequently changes its recommendation, notwithstanding the ability of the PharmAthene Board of Directors, in accordance with its fiduciary duties, to withdraw, modify or amend its recommendation that PharmAthene stockholders vote in favor of the approval of the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock in the merger, which such provisions the PharmAthene Board of Directors believes are reasonable under the circumstances.
º The relatively limited nature of the closing conditions.
º The conditions under which the Merger Agreement may be terminated by either party and the

90


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

conclusion of the PharmAthene Board of Directors that the potential break-up fee of $3.5 million payable by PharmAthene to Theraclone if (a) PharmAthene terminates the Merger Agreement because it has entered into a definitive agreement providing for a PharmAthene Superior Proposal, as described in further detail in the section entitled “ THE MERGER AGREEMENT — No Solicitation” below, (b) the potential break-up fee of $4.5 million payable by PharmAthene to Theraclone if the PharmAthene board changes its voting recommendations to PharmAthene stockholders or PharmAthene terminates the Merger Agreement because the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware has rendered a substantive decision on the merits in that certain litigation matter between PharmAthene and SIGA Technologies, Inc. and the PharmAthene Board of Directors determines, in its reasonable discretion, that, as a result of such decision, it can no longer consider the merger a merger of equals, and (c) the potential termination fee of up to $1.0 million payable by PharmAthene to Theraclone, are reasonable.
º The restrictions on the ability of certain Theraclone stockholders to freely trade some or all of the shares of PharmAthene common stock that they receive in connection with the merger for a period of up to one year following completion of the merger.
º The escrow of five percent of the merger consideration for nine months following closing to provide a fund for payment of any losses to PharmAthene or its affiliates arising from breaches by Theraclone of its representations and warranties, subject to a deductible of $1.0 million.
º The belief that the parties’ respective representations, warranties and covenants, and conditions to their respective obligations, are reasonable under the circumstances.
The voting agreements entered into by certain stockholders of Theraclone representing approximately 75% of the outstanding shares of Theraclone capital stock, as of July 31, 2013, pursuant to which such stockholders agreed, solely in their capacity as stockholders, to vote all of their shares of Theraclone capital stock in favor of adoption of the Merger Agreement and against any alternative acquisition proposal.
The fact that the Board of Directors of PharmAthene after the merger will be composed of five PharmAthene nominees and four Theraclone nominees.
The opinion of Leerink, and its financial presentation, dated July 31, 2013, to the PharmAthene Board of Directors as to the fairness, from a financial perspective, as of the date of the opinion to PharmAthene of the Exchange Ratio, as described more fully in the section entitled “THE MERGER — Opinion of Leerink Swann” below.

The PharmAthene Board of Directors weighed the factors described above, which the PharmAthene Board of Directors viewed generally as supporting its decision to approve the merger and the Merger Agreement, against a number of other factors identified in its deliberations weighing negatively against the merger, including, without limitation, the following material factors:

The fact that the shares of PharmAthene common stock to be issued in the merger will represent approximately 45.9% of the outstanding common stock of the combined company immediately after completion of the merger based on the number of securities of each company outstanding on September 3, 2013 and assuming no PharmAthene or Theraclone option or warrants are exercised prior to the completion of the merger, thus causing PharmAthene stockholders as of immediately prior to completion of the merger to experience immediate and significant dilution in their equity interests and voting power of PharmAthene upon completion of the merger, including, without limitation, their interest in any resolution of the on-going litigation with SIGA.
The risks, uncertainties and other challenges facing the Theraclone programs described in more detail in “RISK FACTORS — Risks Related to Theraclone.”
The fact that, while PharmAthene expects the merger to be completed, there can be no assurance that all conditions to the parties’ obligations to complete the merger, including PharmAthene

91


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

obtaining stockholder approval of the issuance of the PharmAthene common stock in the merger, will be satisfied within the time frames contemplated by the Merger Agreement, especially since some of the conditions are outside the control of PharmAthene, and, as a result, the merger may not be completed.
The amount of time required to complete the merger, the possibility that the merger may not be completed and the potential adverse consequences to PharmAthene if the merger is not completed, including the potential adverse effect on the reputation of PharmAthene, the potential to depress the values offered by others to PharmAthene in a business combination or other alternative transaction and the ability of PharmAthene to obtain financing in the future.
The risk that the per share value of the consideration to be paid in the merger to the Theraclone stockholders could increase significantly from the value prior to the announcement of the Merger Agreement because the Exchange Ratio will not be adjusted for changes in the market price of the PharmAthene common stock or the fair market value of Theraclone capital stock.
The possible negative effect of the public announcement of the merger on PharmAthene’s stock price and the possible volatility in PharmAthene common stock that may occur during the pendency of the merger.
The possibility that the anticipated benefits of the merger may not be realized or that they may be lower than expected.
The substantial costs to be incurred in connection with the merger, including transaction expenses that would be incurred whether or not the merger is completed, and severance payments to certain PharmAthene executive officers triggered by the closing of the transaction.
The risk of diverting the attention of PharmAthene’s management from other strategic priorities to implement the merger and make arrangements for the integration of each company’s operations and infrastructure following the merger.
The risk that PharmAthene’s revenue forecasts are not attained at the level or within the timeframe expected.
The risks, challenges and costs associated with successfully integrating two companies, with separate operations and locations.
The potential loss of key PharmAthene employees critical to the ongoing success of the combined company’s business.
The requirement under the Merger Agreement that PharmAthene call and hold a vote of PharmAthene stockholders to approve the merger and related proposals, even in circumstances where the PharmAthene Board of Directors has withdrawn or adversely changed its recommendation to PharmAthene stockholders with respect to such proposals in response to a superior proposal.
The ability of the PharmAthene stockholders and management to significantly influence the combined company’s business following completion of the merger.
The restrictions on the conduct of PharmAthene’s business prior to completion of the merger, which require PharmAthene to carry on its business in the ordinary course and consistent with past practice, subject to specific additional restrictions, which may delay or prevent PharmAthene from pursuing business opportunities that otherwise would be in its best interests as an independent, stand-alone company.
The risk of stockholder lawsuits that may be filed against PharmAthene and/or the PharmAthene Board of Directors in connection with the Merger Agreement.
The substantial transaction costs and expenses that have been incurred to date and likely will be incurred in connection with the merger.

92


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The other risks of the type and nature described under “RISK FACTORS” and the matters described under “CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS.”

After consideration of these factors, the PharmAthene Board of Directors determined that these risks could be mitigated or managed by PharmAthene or Theraclone or by the combined company following the merger, were reasonably acceptable under the circumstances or, in light of the anticipated benefits, that these risks were unlikely to have a materially adverse impact on the merger or on the combined company following the merger, and that, overall, these risks were significantly outweighed by the potential benefits of the merger.

Although this discussion of the information and factors considered by the PharmAthene Board of Directors is believed to include the material factors considered by the PharmAthene Board of Directors, it is not intended to be exhaustive and may not include all of the factors considered by the PharmAthene Board of Directors. In reaching its determination to approve the merger and adopt and approve the Merger Agreement, the PharmAthene Board of Directors did not find it useful and did not attempt to quantify or assign any relative or specific weights to the various factors that it considered in reaching its determination that the merger and the Merger Agreement are advisable and fair to and in the best interests of PharmAthene and its stockholders. Rather, the PharmAthene Board of Directors based its position and determination on the totality of the information presented to and factors considered by it. In addition, individual members of the PharmAthene Board of Directors may have given differing weights to different factors.

In considering the determination by the PharmAthene Board of Directors that the merger and the Merger Agreement are advisable and fair to and in the best interests of PharmAthene and its stockholders, stockholders should be aware that certain PharmAthene directors and officers have arrangements that may cause them to have interests in the transaction that are different from, in addition to, or may conflict with the interests of PharmAthene stockholders generally. See “THE MERGER— Interests of PharmAthene’s Directors and Officers in the Merger.”

Theraclone Reasons for the Merger

Theraclone’s Board of Directors approved the merger with PharmAthene based on a number of factors, including the following:

the expectation that the merger with PharmAthene would be a more time- and cost-effective means to access sufficient capital than other options considered, including an initial public offering or additional rounds of private equity financing;
the view that the range of options available to the combined company to access private and public equity markets will likely be greater as a public company than continuing as a privately held company;
the view that the combined company will have an increased ability to attract and retain technical talent compared to a privately held company;
the view that the combined company’s diversified pipeline of product candidates, research capabilities, government contracting expertise, access to opportunities for non-dilutive funding and other synergies creates a superior company when compared to remaining as an independent private company;
the strategic alternatives of Theraclone to the merger, including remaining an independent private company, attempting an initial public offering, entering into a business combination transaction with an alternative company and additional strategic partnerships;
the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, including the following related factors:
º the determination that the relative percentage ownership of Theraclone and PharmAthene stockholders is fair and based on the valuations of each company at the time of Theraclone’s Board of Directors’ approval of the Merger Agreement;
º the expectation that the merger will be treated as a reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes, with the result that in the merger, Theraclone’s stockholders will generally not recognize taxable gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes;

93


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

º the potential termination fees payable to Theraclone if PharmAthene terminates the Merger Agreement, including the potential termination fee of $3.5 million if PharmAthene terminates the Merger Agreement because it enters into a definitive agreement providing for a PharmAthene Superior Proposal, as described in further detail in the section entitled “THE MERGER AGREEMENT — No Solicitation” below, and the potential termination fee of $4.5 million if PharmAthene terminates the Merger Agreement because the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware renders a substantive decision on the merits in the litigation matter between PharmAthene and SIGA and the PharmAthene Board of Directors determines that, as a result of such decision, it can no longer consider the merger a merger of equals;
º the view that the terms of the Merger Agreement, including the parties’ representations, warranties and covenants, and the conditions to their respective obligations, are reasonable under the circumstances;
º the likelihood that the merger will be consummated on a timely basis, including the likelihood that the merger will receive all necessary approvals;
º the opportunity for Theraclone stockholders to hold shares of a publicly traded company; and
º the possibility that the combined entity would be able to take advantage of the potential benefits resulting from the combination of PharmAthene’s public company infrastructure and Theraclone’s management team.

In the course of its deliberations, Theraclone’s Board of Directors also considered a variety of risks and other countervailing factors related to entering into the Merger Agreement, including:

the substantial expenses to be incurred in connection with the merger;
the risk that the merger might not be consummated in a timely manner or at all and the potential adverse effect on the reputation of Theraclone of the public announcement of the merger or on the delay or failure to complete the merger;
the trading price of the combined company’s common stock may be subject to significant fluctuations and volatility;
expenses and obligations to which the combined company would be subject as a result of being a public company that could adversely affect the combined company’s operating results and preclude the achievement of some of the benefits anticipated from the merger;
the risk to the business of Theraclone, operations and financial results in the event that the merger is not consummated in a timely manner or at all; and
various other risks associated with the combined company and the merger, including those described in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation.

The foregoing information and factors considered by Theraclone’s Board of Directors are not intended to be exhaustive but are believed to include all of the material factors considered by Theraclone’s Board of Directors. Theraclone’s Board of Directors conducted an overall analysis of the factors described above, including thorough discussions with Theraclone’s legal and financial advisors, and considered the factors overall to be favorable to, and to support, its determination to approve the merger and to recommend that Theraclone’s stockholders approve the merger with PharmAthene and the related transactions.

Opinion of Leerink Swann

Pursuant to an engagement letter dated May 6, 2013, PharmAthene engaged Leerink to render an opinion with respect to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the consideration to be paid in connection with a possible merger or acquisition involving PharmAthene. At a meeting of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors on July 31, 2013, Leerink rendered its oral opinion to PharmAthene’s Board of Directors, confirmed by delivery of a written opinion dated July 31, 2013, that, as of such date and based upon and subject to the

94


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

factors, assumptions, qualifications and limitations set forth in its written opinion, the Exchange Ratio was fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of PharmAthene common stock (other than Theraclone and its affiliates).

The full text of the written opinion of Leerink, dated July 31, 2013, which sets forth, among other things, the assumptions made, qualifications, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken by Leerink in connection with the opinion, is attached as Annex F hereto, and is incorporated herein by reference. The summary of the opinion set forth herein is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion. PharmAthene and Theraclone encourage you to read the entire opinion carefully and in its entirety. Leerink provided its opinion for the benefit and use of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors in its consideration of the transaction, and its opinion is directed only to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of PharmAthene common stock (other than Theraclone and its affiliates) of the Exchange Ratio, as of the date of the opinion. The Leerink opinion does not constitute an opinion as to the merits of the merger or the prices at which shares of PharmAthene common stock will trade at any time, and is not a recommendation to any holder of PharmAthene common stock as to how such holder should vote with respect to the merger, or any other matter.

In connection with rendering the opinion described above and performing its related financial analyses, Leerink reviewed and considered such financial and other information as it deemed relevant, including, among other things:

(i) a draft of the Merger Agreement, dated July 30, 2013;
(ii) certain financial and other business information of Theraclone and PharmAthene furnished to Leerink by the managements of Theraclone and PharmAthene, respectively;
(iii) published estimates of independent research analysts with respect to the future financial performance and price targets of PharmAthene;
(iv) certain periodic reports and other publicly available information regarding PharmAthene;
(v) comparisons of certain publicly available financial data of companies whose securities are traded in the public markets and that Leerink deemed relevant to similar data for Theraclone and PharmAthene;
(vi) certain estimates as to the amount and timing of cost savings and related expenses anticipated by the management of PharmAthene to result from the merger, or the Synergies; and
(vii) such other information, financial studies, analyses and investigations and such other factors that Leerink deemed relevant for the purposes of its letter and opinion.

In addition, Leerink held discussions with members of senior management and representatives of PharmAthene concerning the matters described in clauses (ii) through (vii) above, as well as the businesses and prospects of Theraclone and PharmAthene.

In conducting its review and analysis and in arriving at its opinion, Leerink, with PharmAthene’s consent, assumed and relied, without independent investigation, upon the accuracy and completeness of all financial and other information provided to Leerink, or publicly available. Leerink did not undertake any responsibility for independently verifying, and did not independently verify the accuracy, completeness or reasonableness of any such information. With respect to financial forecasts for PharmAthene and Theraclone, and the estimated Synergies that were provided to Leerink, Leerink was advised, and assumed, with PharmAthene’s consent, that such forecasts and estimated Synergies were reasonably prepared in good faith on the basis of reasonable assumptions and reflected the best currently available estimates and judgments of PharmAthene and Theraclone, respectively, as to the future financial condition and performance of PharmAthene and Theraclone and the synergies estimated to be derived from the merger. Leerink expressed no opinion with respect to such forecasts or estimates or the assumptions upon which they were based. Leerink assumed, with PharmAthene’s consent, that the future revenues of PharmAthene which may result from the subject matter of its pending litigation with SIGA Technologies, Inc. will be equal to the damages awarded by the Delaware Chancery Court in its judgment dated May 31, 2012 (which was subsequently remanded by the Delaware Supreme Court on May 24, 2013 for reconsideration). Leerink expressed no opinion with respect to the amount of such

95


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

future revenues or the assumptions upon which such revenues are based. Leerink did not make or obtain any independent evaluations, valuations or appraisals of the assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of Theraclone or PharmAthene, nor was Leerink furnished with such materials.

Leerink did not make any independent investigation of any legal, accounting or tax matters relating to PharmAthene or Theraclone, and assumed the correctness of all legal, accounting and tax advice given to Theraclone and PharmAthene.

For purposes of rendering its opinion, Leerink assumed in all respects material to the analysis, that the consideration to be received in the merger was determined through arm’s-length negotiations between the appropriate parties, that the representations and warranties of each party contained in the Merger Agreement are true and correct, that each party will perform all of the covenants and agreements required to be performed by it under the Merger Agreement without material alteration or waiver thereof, that all governmental, regulatory or other consents and approvals necessary for the consummation of the merger will be obtained without any adverse effect on the expected benefits of the merger in any way meaningful to the analysis and that all conditions to the consummation of the proposed merger will be satisfied without waiver thereof or material alteration to the terms of the proposed merger. Leerink assumed, with PharmAthene’s consent, that the fully diluted equity of PharmAthene as of the date of its opinion was 59,221,000 shares and the fully diluted equity of Theraclone as of the date of its opinion was 51,687,000 shares, resulting in an Exchange Ratio of approximately 1.1458 shares of PharmAthene common stock for each share of Theraclone common stock, and that there would be no change (other than a de minimis change) in the fully diluted equity of PharmAthene or Theraclone after the date of its opinion. Leerink also assumed, with PharmAthene’s consent, that the final form of the Merger Agreement would be substantially the same as the last draft reviewed by Leerink. In addition, Leerink assumed, with PharmAthene’s consent, that the historical financial statements of Theraclone and PharmAthene reviewed by Leerink had been prepared and fairly presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP consistently applied. Leerink further assumed, with PharmAthene’s consent, that as of the date of its opinion, there had been no material adverse change in Theraclone’s or PharmAthene’s assets, financial condition, results of operations, business or prospects since the date of the last audited financial statements made available to Leerink which change had not been disclosed to Leerink prior to the date of its opinion.

Leerink was not requested to opine as to, and its opinion does not express any opinion as to (i) the value of any employee agreement or other arrangement entered into in connection with the proposed merger, or (ii) any tax or other consequences that might result from the proposed merger and related transactions. Furthermore, Leerink expressed no opinion with respect to, the amount or nature of compensation to any officer, director or employee of any party to the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, or any class of such persons, relative to the consideration to be paid by PharmAthene in the merger or with respect to the fairness of any such compensation.

Leerink’s opinion relates solely to the fairness of the exchange ratio to the holders of PharmAthene common stock (other than Theraclone and its affiliates), and its opinion does not address PharmAthene’s underlying business decision to proceed with or effect the proposed merger or any other term, aspect or implication of the proposed merger or any other agreement or arrangement entered into in connection with the proposed merger. Leerink was not requested to opine as to, and its letter and opinion do not in any manner address, the fairness of the merger or the exchange ratio to the holders of any class of securities (other than the PharmAthene common stock) or creditors or any other constituency of PharmAthene. Leerink is not expressing any opinion as to the impact of the merger on the solvency or viability of PharmAthene or Theraclone or the ability of PharmAthene or Theraclone to pay its obligations when they come due. In addition, Leerink’s letter and opinion do not address any legal or accounting matters, as to which Leerink understood that PharmAthene had obtained such advice as it has deemed necessary from qualified professionals. Leerink did not express any opinion as to the prices at which shares of the PharmAthene common stock may trade at any time.

Leerink’s opinion was necessarily based upon economic and market conditions and other circumstances as they existed and could be evaluated by Leerink on the date of its opinion. It should be understood that

96


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

although subsequent developments may affect Leerink’s opinion, Leerink does not have any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm Leerink’s opinion and Leerink expressly disclaims any responsibility to do so.

Leerink’s opinion was intended for the benefit and use of Board of Directors of PharmAthene in its consideration of the proposed merger. Leerink’s letter and opinion do not constitute a recommendation of the merger to PharmAthene’s Board of Directors nor do they constitute a recommendation to any holder of PharmAthene common stock as to how such holder should vote with respect to the merger or otherwise. Leerink’s opinion was authorized by Leerink’s Fairness Opinion Review Committee.

The following is a summary of the material financial analyses utilized by Leerink and presented to PharmAthene’s Board of Directors by Leerink in connection with rendering its opinion. The following summary, however, does not purport to be a complete description of the financial analyses performed by Leerink, nor does the order of analyses described represent relative importance or weight given to those analyses by Leerink. Some of the summaries of the financial analyses include information presented in tabular format. The tables must be read together with the full text of each summary and alone are not a complete description of Leerink’s financial analyses. Considering the following data without considering the full narrative description of the financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of Leerink’s financial analyses. Except as otherwise noted, the following quantitative information, to the extent that it is based on market data, is based on market data as it existed on or before July 29, 2013 and is not necessarily indicative of current market conditions.

Selected Publicly Traded Companies Analysis

To provide contextual data and comparative market information, Leerink compared certain operating and financial information for Theraclone to the corresponding operating and financial information of certain other development stage biopharma companies, whose securities are publicly traded. The selected companies and metrics that Leerink reviewed were the following:

   
Company   Market Value ($mm)   Enterprise Value ($mm)
BioCryst Pharmaceuticals   $ 232.8     $ 234.5  
Dynavax Technologies   $ 232.6     $ 127.2  
Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals   $ 161.7     $ 97.3  
Galena Biopharma   $ 152.2     $ 124.6  
KaloBios Pharmaceuticals   $ 142.6     $ 75.6  
Biota Pharmaceuticals   $ 105.4     $ 35.1  

Although none of the selected companies is directly comparable to Theraclone, the companies included were chosen because they are publicly traded companies with operations that, for purposes of analysis, may be considered similar to certain operations of Theraclone.

Leerink calculated and compared various financial metrics for each of the selected companies based on closing stock prices as of July 29, 2013, and publicly available financial data from SEC filings and FactSet consensus estimates as of that date. With respect to each of the selected companies, Leerink calculated:

market value, which is the diluted equity value using the treasury stock method based on outstanding options, warrants and restricted shares units; and
enterprise value, which is the diluted equity value using the treasury stock method based on outstanding options, warrants and restricted shares units, plus the value of such company’s indebtedness and minority interests and preferred stock, minus such company’s cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, in each case, as of such company’s latest SEC filing prior to July 29, 2013.

Illustrative Sum of the Parts Analysis

Leerink performed an illustrative sum of the parts analysis on Theraclone consisting of (i) a discounted cash flow analysis on Theraclone’ two development stage product candidates using the financial forecasts for Theraclone provided by management of Theraclone and provided by management of PharmAthene, calculated based on the forecasted free cash flows of each product from 2013 through 2028, discounted to present value using a discount rate of 15% and applying a range of probabilities of success to such forecasts ranging from

97


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

25% to 35%, (ii) an estimate of the net present value for Theraclone’s pre-clinical programs based upon assumed potential future milestone payments associated with such programs using a discount rate of 15% and applying a range of probabilities of success to such programs and (iii) adding to the sum of the amounts derived from the analyses in (i) and (ii) above the net cash of Theraclone. The following table presents the results of this analysis:

 
Illustrative Equity Value – PharmAthene Case   $42mm - $86mm
Illustrative Equity Value – Theraclone Case   $85mm - $152mm

In addition, because PharmAthene proposes to use shares of PharmAthene common stock as the form of consideration in the merger, Leerink conducted a similar financial analysis on the value of PharmAthene’s common stock. The following is a summary of the material financial analyses utilized by Leerink and presented to PharmAthene’s Board of Directors by Leerink in connection with rendering its opinion.

Selected Publicly Traded Companies Analysis

To provide contextual data and comparative market information, Leerink compared certain operating and financial information for PharmAthene to the corresponding operating and financial information of certain other companies in the biodefense industry, whose securities are publicly traded. The selected companies and metrics that Leerink reviewed were the following:

   
Company   Market Value ($mm)   Enterprise Value ($mm)
Bavarian Nordic A/S   $ 280.6     $ 223.1  
SIGA Technologies Inc.   $ 174.1     $ 154.3  
Cangene Corp.   $ 143.8     $ 105.3  
Biota Pharmaceuticals Inc.   $ 105.4     $ 35.1  
Cleveland Biolabs Inc.   $ 74.3     $ 53.4  

Although none of the selected companies is directly comparable to PharmAthene, the companies included were chosen because they are publicly traded companies with operations that, for purposes of analysis, may be considered similar to certain operations of PharmAthene.

Leerink calculated and compared various financial metrics for each of the selected companies and for PharmAthene based on closing stock prices as of July 29, 2013, and publicly available financial data from SEC filings and FactSet consensus estimates as of that date. With respect to PharmAthene and each of the selected companies, Leerink calculated:

market value, which is the diluted equity value using the treasury stock method based on outstanding options, warrants and restricted shares units; and
enterprise value, which is the diluted equity value using the treasury stock method based on outstanding options, warrants and restricted shares units, plus the value of such company’s indebtedness and minority interests and preferred stock, minus such company’s cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, in each case, as of such company’s latest SEC filing prior to July 29.

Illustrative Sum of the Parts Analysis

Leerink performed an illustrative sum of the parts analysis on PharmAthene consisting of (i) a discounted cash flow analysis of PharmAthene’s existing products using the financial forecasts for PharmAthene provided by management of PharmAthene, calculated based on the forecasted free cash flows of each product from 2013 through 2021, discounted to present value using a discount rate of 15% and applying a range of probabilities of success to such forecasts, (ii) an estimate of the future revenues of PharmAthene which may result from the subject matter of its pending litigation with SIGA Technologies, Inc., which Leerink assumed would be equal to the damages awarded by the Delaware Chancery Court in its judgment dated May 31, 2012 (which was subsequently remanded by the Delaware Supreme Court on May 24, 2013 for reconsideration) and (iii) adding to the sum of the amounts derived from the analyses in (i) and (ii) above the net cash of PharmAthene. The following table presents the results of this analysis:

 
Illustrative Equity Value / Equity Value per share of
PharmAthene Common Stock
  $89mm / $1.72

98


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Leerink noted that the valuation of PharmAthene is highly dependent upon the outcome of the SIGA Technologies, Inc. litigation described above, that the outcome of this litigation is inherently uncertain, and that there is no assurance as to the value that will ultimately be realized by PharmAthene as a result of this litigation.

General

The foregoing summary of certain material financial analyses does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses or data presented by Leerink. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process involving various determinations and subjective judgments as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of those methods to the particular circumstances. Therefore, such an opinion and the analyses used in arriving at such an opinion are not readily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. Selecting portions of the analyses or of the summary set forth above, without considering the analyses as a whole, could create an incomplete view of the processes underlying Leerink’s opinion. In arriving at its fairness determination, Leerink considered the results of all of its analyses and did not attribute any particular weight to any factor or analysis considered by it. Rather, Leerink made qualitative judgments as to the significance and relevance of each analysis and factor on the basis of its experience and professional judgment after considering the results of all of its analyses. Accordingly, notwithstanding the separate factors summarized above, Leerink believes, and has advised PharmAthene’s Board of Directors, that its analysis must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of the analyses and the factors considered by it, without considering all analyses and factors, could create an incomplete view of the processes underlying Leerink’s opinion.

In performing its analyses, Leerink made numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance, business and economic conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of PharmAthene. The analyses performed by Leerink based upon forecasts of future results are not necessarily indicative of actual future results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by these analyses. In addition, analyses relating to the value of businesses do not purport to be appraisals nor do they necessarily reflect the prices at which businesses or securities actually may be acquired. Accordingly, as such analyses and estimates are inherently subject to uncertainty, being based upon numerous factors or events beyond the control of the parties or their respective advisors, neither PharmAthene nor Leerink nor any other person assumes responsibility if future results are materially different from those forecast. No company or transaction used in the above analyses as a comparison is directly comparable to Theraclone or PharmAthene or the contemplated Transaction. None of PharmAthene, Leerink or any other person assumes responsibility if future results are materially different from those projected. The analyses supplied by Leerink and its opinion were among several factors taken into consideration by PharmAthene’s Board of Directors in making its decision to enter into the Merger Agreement and should not be considered determinative of such decision.

Leerink prepared these analyses for purposes of Leerink's providing its opinion to PharmAthene’s Board of Directors as to the fairness from a financial point of view of the Exchange Ratio to the holders of PharmAthene common stock (other than Theraclone and its affiliates). The Exchange Ratio was determined through arm’s-length negotiations between PharmAthene and its representatives, on the one hand, and Theraclone and its representatives, on the other hand. Leerink provided advice to PharmAthene during these negotiations. Leerink did not, however, recommend any specific Exchange Ratio to PharmAthene or its Board of Directors or suggest that any specific exchange ratio constituted the only appropriate Exchange Ratio for the Transaction.

The decision by PharmAthene’s Board of Directors to approve the merger and enter into the Merger Agreement was solely that of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors. As described in the foregoing, Leerink's opinion to PharmAthene’s Board of Directors was one of many factors taken into consideration by PharmAthene’s Board of Directors in making its determination to approve the Merger Agreement and the Transaction contemplated by the merger.

Leerink is an investment banking firm focused exclusively on healthcare. Leerink is recognized as a leading investment bank for both emerging and established healthcare companies. Leerink, as part of its investment banking business, is continually engaged in the valuation of businesses and securities in connection

99


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

with business combinations and acquisitions and for other purposes. Leerink was selected by PharmAthene due to its substantial experience in the healthcare industry and with transactions similar to this transaction.

Leerink is a full-service securities firm engaged in securities trading and brokerage activities as well as investment banking and financial advisory services. In the ordinary course of its trading and brokerage activities, Leerink or its affiliates have in the past and may in the future hold positions, for its own account or the accounts of its customers, in equity, debt or other securities of PharmAthene, Theraclone or their respective affiliates.

Leerink acted as financial advisor to PharmAthene in connection with, and participated in certain of the negotiations leading to, the Transaction contemplated by the Merger Agreement. In connection with unrelated matters, Leerink has acted as underwriter in connection with PharmAthene’s registered direct offering in June 2011. From June 15, 2011 to July 31, 2013, Leerink has received fees for such services aggregating approximately $377,960 from PharmAthene. Additionally, in the ordinary course of business, Leerink and its affiliates may, in the future, provide commercial and investment banking services to PharmAthene or its affiliates. In connection with such services, Leerink and/or its affiliates may, in the future, receive customary compensation. Leerink has not provided any services to, or received fees from, Theraclone during the past two years prior to the date of its opinion.

Pursuant to the Leerink engagement letter, in connection with the merger, Leerink will be entitled to receive a transaction fee equal to approximately $1,000,000 that is contingent upon consummation of the merger. A fee of $500,000 (credited against the ultimate transaction fee payable upon closing) became payable upon Leerink’s delivery of its fairness opinion. Additionally, PharmAthene has agreed to reimburse Leerink for its out-of-pocket expenses, including attorney’s fees, and has agreed to indemnify Leerink against certain liabilities. The terms of the fee arrangement with Leerink, which are customary in transactions of this nature, were negotiated at arm’s length between Leerink and PharmAthene, and PharmAthene’s Board of Directors was aware of the arrangement, including the fact that the transaction fee payable to Leerink is contingent upon the completion of the merger pursuant to the Merger Agreement.

Interests of PharmAthene’s Directors and Officers in the Merger

In considering the recommendation of the PharmAthene Board of Directors to PharmAthene stockholders to vote in favor of the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock in the merger, and the other matters to be acted upon by PharmAthene stockholders at the PharmAthene special meeting, PharmAthene stockholders should be aware that members of the PharmAthene Board of Directors and PharmAthene’s officers have interests in the merger that may be different from, in addition to, or may conflict with the interests of PharmAthene stockholders. These interests relate to or arise from, among other things:

The fact that Mitchel Sayare, Ph.D., John M. Gill, Brian A. Markison, Eric I. Richman and Derace L. Schaffer, M.D., each of whom is a current director of PharmAthene, will continue to serve on the Board of Directors of the combined company following completion of the merger and will receive cash and equity compensation in connection with such service as described in more detail below.
The fact that current members of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors who resign upon the completion of the merger will receive director fees at current levels until the end of 2013, even though they may not remain on the Board of Directors through that date.
Severance benefits to which each of Eric I. Richman and Linda L. Chang will become entitled in connection with completion of the merger, as described in more detail below.
New employment agreements for all other executive officers that are expected to increase the duration of the period during which they would receive severance benefits following a termination without cause or for good reason from six to twelve months.
The accelerated vesting of all PharmAthene stock options held by the departing directors and executive officers of PharmAthene upon completion of the merger as described in more detail below.
The right to continued indemnification and insurance coverage for directors and executive officers of PharmAthene following completion of the merger, pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, as described in more detail below.

100


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The PharmAthene Board of Directors was aware of these potential conflicts of interest and considered them, among other matters, in reaching its decision to approve the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger and the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock, and to recommend that PharmAthene stockholders approve the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock in the merger and related matters. Other than full disclosure of these potential conflicts of interest, the PharmAthene Board of Directors did not take any other steps to alleviate such potential conflicts of interest since it did not consider such potential conflicts of interest to be material in connection with its decision to approve the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger and the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock.

Ownership Interests

As of September 3, 2013, the latest practicable date before the filing of this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation, directors and executive officers of PharmAthene, together with their respective affiliates, owned, in the aggregate, and were entitled to vote 1,496,972 shares of PharmAthene common stock, or approximately 2.9% of the shares of PharmAthene common stock outstanding on that date. Assuming the merger had been completed as of such date, all directors and executive officers of PharmAthene, together with their respective affiliates, would own, in the aggregate, 1.3% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the combined company.

For a more complete discussion of the ownership interests of the directors and executive officers of PharmAthene, see the sections entitled “PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS OF PHARMATHENE” and “PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS OF THE COMBINED COMPANY.”

Continuing Directors

Following completion of the merger, Mitchel Sayare, Ph.D., John M. Gill, Brian A. Markison, Eric I. Richman and Derace L. Schaffer, M.D., are expected to receive cash and equity compensation in accordance with PharmAthene’s equity compensation policies for non-employee directors. Currently, PharmAthene’s policy provides:

annual cash retainer for membership on the PharmAthene Board of Directors is $40,000, which may, at the election of each director, be paid in cash or equity (in the form of non-qualified stock options and/or restricted stock awards);
º non-qualified stock options issued in lieu of the cash retainer vest in equal quarterly installments over the period of one year and are valued pursuant to a Black-Scholes calculation using the same assumptions PharmAthene used for stock option expense calculations in PharmAthene’s then most recently filed quarterly report on Form 10-Q;
º restricted stock awards issued in lieu of the cash retainer vest in equal quarterly installments over the period of one year and are valued at their fair market value on the date of grant;
$25,000 additional cash retainer for the Chairman of the PharmAthene Board of Directors;
$15,000 cash retainer for the Audit Committee chair;
$5,000 cash retainer for membership on the Audit Committee (other than Audit Committee chair);
$12,000 cash retainer for the Compensation Committee chair;
$3,000 cash retainer for membership on the Compensation Committee (other than Compensation Committee chair);
$10,000 cash retainer for the Governance and Nominating Committee chair;
$2,500 cash retainer for membership on the Governance and Nominating Committee (other than Governance and Nominating Committee chair);
$10,000 cash retainer for the Government Affairs Committee chair; and
$2,500 cash retainer for membership on the Government Affairs Committee (other than Government Affairs Committee chair).

101


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

No other cash fees are payable to non-employee board members for their service on the PharmAthene Board of Directors.

In addition, every non-employee member of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors is entitled annually to receive an option to purchase 20,000 shares of PharmAthene’s common stock on the date of PharmAthene’s annual meeting of stockholders, at an exercise price per share based on the closing price of PharmAthene’s common stock on the grant date as reported on the NYSE MKT.

In addition to the above compensation, upon initially joining the PharmAthene Board of Directors, a member is entitled to receive an option to purchase 20,000 shares of common stock, at an exercise price per share based on the closing price of PharmAthene’s common stock on the grant date as reported on the NYSE MKT.

Employment Agreements and Severance and Change in Control Agreements

Upon completion of the merger and the anticipated termination of their employment on the date following completion of the merger, Eric I. Richman and Linda L. Chang will be entitled to receive certain severance payments and other benefits or payments, as applicable, each as more fully described below. PharmAthene intends to establish a rabbi trust to hold funds to pay the severance amounts owed to Mr. Richman and Ms. Chang that are subject to the six-month suspension rule under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

Employment Agreements

Eric I. Richman

Mr. Richman was appointed PharmAthene’s President and Chief Operating Officer on March 25, 2010, PharmAthene’s interim Chief Executive Officer on May 2, 2010, and PharmAthene’s Chief Executive Officer on October 20, 2010. On December 23, 2010, PharmAthene entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Richman, for the period commencing on January 1, 2011 and ending on the first anniversary of such date. The term of the agreement is automatically extended for an additional year on each anniversary unless 90 days’ prior written notice of non-extension is provided, provided that a nonrenewal by PharmAthene is treated as a termination without cause under the agreement. On July 31, 2013 PharmAthene’s Board of Directors approved an amendment to Mr. Richman’s employment agreement, which will become effective immediately prior to the closing of the merger (and only if the merger closes).

Under the agreement, Mr. Richman is paid an annual base salary of $435,000, subject to annual review and increase at the option of the Compensation Committee of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors. Effective January 1, 2013, Mr. Richman’s base salary was increased to $456,187. Mr. Richman is also eligible for an annual cash bonus, the target of which is no less than 60% of his base salary, based on the achievement of certain corporate objectives. The corporate objectives will be determined by the Compensation Committee in consultation with Mr. Richman, while the achievement of such objectives will be determined by the Compensation Committee.

Pursuant to the agreement, as of December 23, 2010 Mr. Richman was granted an option, under PharmAthene’s 2007 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended, or the 2007 Plan to purchase 225,000 shares of PharmAthene’s common stock at an exercise price of $3.91 per share, the closing price of PharmAthene’s common stock on the NYSE MKT on December 23, 2010. The option, which has a term of ten years, vests over a four year period with 25% vesting on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date. In the event of a change in control during Mr. Richman’s employment period and a termination other than for cause or a termination for good reason occurs on or within twelve months of the consummation of the change in control, all equity issued by PharmAthene held by Mr. Richman and not then vested (except for the restricted stock awards which are treated as described below) will immediately and fully vest.

In accordance with the agreement, Mr. Richman received a cash bonus for 2010 of $105,000. In addition, as of December 23, 2010, Mr. Richman was granted 35,000 shares of restricted stock of PharmAthene under the 2007 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan, or the 2007 Plan, which vested in full on the three month anniversary of the grant date.

102


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Under the terms of the agreement, if Mr. Richman is terminated other than for cause or he resigns for good reason, he is entitled to receive, in addition to unpaid salary and expenses and payment of accrued incentive compensation amounts, (i) severance payments in the form of a continuation of his base salary in effect immediately prior to the termination for a period of 12 months following the termination, (ii) a lump-sum payment equal to the accrued portion of his target bonus, including any unpaid portion of the prior year’s bonus, and (iii) COBRA coverage, to the extent elected, provided at the same premiums as are charged to active employees for the same level of group health coverage for a period of 12 months following termination, all of which are payable in consideration for and only after he executes a general release containing terms reasonably satisfactory to PharmAthene. The same provisions apply if Mr. Richman is terminated without cause or if he resigns for good reason within 12 months of a change of control and no new employment agreement has been entered into within 90 days of such change of control, except that Mr. Richman’s severance payment would be made in one lump-sum payment corresponding to 18 months’ salary, he would also receive his target bonus for the year of termination and all equity-based awards held by Mr. Richman would be deemed fully vested as of the date of termination.

The agreement specifies that Mr. Richman’s previous employment agreement with PharmAthene was terminated as of January 1, 2011, other than with respect to provisions that specifically survive a termination thereof and other than with respect to the provision in Amendment No. 1 to his previous employment agreement relating to the grant of options to purchase 100,000 shares of PharmAthene’s common stock, which vested in full on May 2, 2011. Amendment No. 1 to his previous employment agreement had been executed on May 18, 2010 in connection with Mr. Richman’s appointment to the position of President and interim Chief Executive Officer. Under the amendment, Mr. Richman had been paid an annual base salary of $350,000 effective from May 2, 2010.

The December 23, 2010 agreement requires that during his employment and for a period of 12 months (in some cases 18 months) following termination of the employment, Mr. Richman shall not directly or indirectly engage in the development, production, marketing or sale of products that compete with PharmAthene’s products or assist others in a competing business or induce other employees of PharmAthene to terminate their employment with PharmAthene or engage in a competing business. Mr. Richman is furthermore required to refrain from directly or indirectly disclosing any confidential information obtained while working at PharmAthene.

The agreement further specifies that if Mr. Richman becomes entitled to severance payments, subject to a limited exception in case of adverse tax effects, all salary continuation payments shall be placed in an irrevocable grantor trust, the assets of which are to be used to make the severance payments to the executive or satisfy the claims of PharmAthene’s unsecured general creditors in the event of PharmAthene’s insolvency or bankruptcy. If Mr. Richman is a “specified employee” (as determined in accordance with Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(i) or related Company policy) at the time of termination, the severance payments otherwise payable to Mr. Richman during the first six months following termination (to the extent they constitute “nonqualified deferred compensation” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations thereunder) will be deferred until the date that is six months after termination of employment (or earlier upon his death).

Change in Control is defined in the agreement as (i) an acquisition by any person, entity or group (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) or 14(d)(2) of the Exchange Act, of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) of 30% or more of either (a) the then outstanding shares of common stock of PharmAthene or (b) the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of PharmAthene entitled to vote generally in the election of directors; excluding, however, certain acquisitions from or by PharmAthene or an employee benefit plan sponsored or maintained by PharmAthene; (ii) a merger, consolidation, reorganization or similar corporate transaction, in which outstanding shares of common stock are converted into (a) shares of stock of another company, other than a conversion into shares of voting common stock of the successor corporation (or a holding company thereof) representing 80% of the voting power of all capital stock thereof outstanding immediately after the merger or consolidation or (b) other securities (of either PharmAthene or another company) or cash or other property; (iii) the issuance of shares of common stock in connection with a merger, consolidation, reorganization or similar corporate transaction in an amount in excess of 40% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding immediately prior to the

103


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

consummation of such transaction; (iv) the (a) the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of PharmAthene or (b) a complete liquidation or dissolution of PharmAthene; or (v) the adoption by the board of a resolution to the effect that any person has acquired effective control of the business and affairs of PharmAthene.

Termination “for good reason” is defined as a termination by the executive for (i) any material breach by PharmAthene of PharmAthene’s obligations under the employment agreement; (ii) any material reduction in the executive’s duties, authority or responsibilities without the executive’s consent; (iii) any assignment to the executive of duties or responsibilities materially inconsistent with the executive’s position and duties under the employment agreement without consent; (iv) a relocation of PharmAthene’s principal executive offices or PharmAthene’s determination to require the executive to be based more than 25 miles away; (v) depriving the executive of any material benefit plan; (vi) non-renewal by PharmAthene of the agreement in accordance with the terms of the agreement; or (vii) the failure by PharmAthene to obtain the specific assumption of the employment agreement by any successor or assignee of PharmAthene or any person acquiring substantially all of PharmAthene’s assets. Mr. Richman may not terminate “for good reason” unless he first provides PharmAthene with written notice specifying the good reason and provides PharmAthene with 20 days in which to remedy the stated reason.

Termination “for cause” is defined as a termination for (i) willful and substantial misconduct that materially injures PharmAthene and is not corrected; (ii) repeated neglect of duties or failure to act, which can reasonably be expected to materially and adversely affect PharmAthene’s business or affairs, after written notice from PharmAthene; (iii) material breach of the confidentiality and related provisions of the employment agreement or of PharmAthene’s policies; (iv) commission of material fraud with respect to PharmAthene’s business and affairs; (v) conviction of, or nolo contendere plea to, a felony; (vi) demonstrable gross negligence or (vii) habitual insobriety or use of illegal drugs adversely affecting the executive’s duties.

On July 31, 2013, PharmAthene’s Board of Directors approved amendments to Mr. Richman’s employment agreement. Please see the section entitled “— Termination in Connection with the Merger” for a description of the amended provisions of Mr. Richman’s employment agreement, as they apply to the merger.

Please see the section entitled “— Severance Plan” below with respect to “change of control” events.

Jordan P. Karp

On June 30, 2008, PharmAthene entered into an employment agreement with Jordan Karp, under which Mr. Karp serves as PharmAthene’s General Counsel, for the period commencing on June 30, 2008 and ending on the first anniversary of such date. The term of the agreement is automatically extended for an additional year on each anniversary unless 90 days’ prior written notice of non-extension is provided.

Under the agreement, Mr. Karp is paid an annual base salary of $275,000, subject to annual review and increase at the option of the Compensation Committee. Effective January 1, 2013, Mr. Karp’s base salary was increased to $320,588. Mr. Karp is also eligible for an annual cash bonus of up to 30% of his base salary payable at the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee, and may be eligible for additional bonuses at the option and sole discretion of the Compensation Committee based on the achievement of certain pre-determined performance milestones.

The agreement reflects the grant of an option, under the 2007 Plan, as amended, to purchase up to 200,000 shares of PharmAthene’s common stock at an exercise price of $2.37 per share, the closing price of PharmAthene’s common stock on the NYSE MKT on the date of grant. The option, which has a term of ten years, vests in four equal installments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant.

Under the terms of his agreement, if Mr. Karp is terminated other than for cause or he resigns for good reason, he is entitled to receive, in addition to unpaid salary and expenses and payment of accrued incentive compensation amounts, severance payments in the form of a continuation of his base salary in effect immediately prior to the termination for a period of six months following the termination (subject to a pending amendment that will extend the period to 12 months), which are payable in consideration for and only after he executes a general release containing terms reasonably satisfactory to PharmAthene. Termination “for cause” or “for good reason” is as defined above under “— Eric I. Richman,” except that non-renewal by PharmAthene of the agreement in accordance with the terms of the agreement does not qualify as a

104


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

termination “for good reason” in the employment agreement for Mr. Karp. Please also read the disclosure under “— Severance Plan” below with respect to “change of control” events.

Linda L. Chang

On February 7, 2012, PharmAthene entered into an employment agreement with Linda L. Chang, under which Ms. Chang serves as PharmAthene’s Chief Financial Officer, for the period commencing on February 7, 2012 and ending on the first anniversary of her hiring date, November 7, 2012. The term of the agreement is automatically extended for an additional year on each anniversary unless 90 days’ prior written notice of non-extension is provided. On July 31, 2013 PharmAthene’s Board of Directors approved an amendment to Ms. Chang’s employment agreement, which will become effective immediately prior to the closing of the merger (and only if the merger closes).

Under the agreement, Ms. Chang is paid an annual base salary of $300,000, subject to annual review and increase at the option of the Compensation Committee. Effective January 1, 2013, Ms. Chang’s base salary was increased to $318,000. Ms. Chang is also eligible for an annual cash bonus of up to 30% of her base salary payable at the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee, and may be eligible for additional bonuses at the option and sole discretion of the Compensation Committee based on the achievement of certain pre-determined performance milestones.

The agreement reflected payment of a $25,000 signing bonus upon her employment with PharmAthene, with the requirement that she repay such amount if she resigns her employment for any reason other than for “good reason” or PharmAthene terminates her employment for “cause” prior to November 7, 2012. The agreement reflected the grant of an option, under the 2007 Plan to purchase up to 170,000 shares of PharmAthene’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.59 per share, the closing price of PharmAthene’s common stock on the NYSE MKT on the date of grant. The option, which has a term of ten years, vests immediately with respect to 20,000 shares, with the remaining 150,000 shares vesting over a 4 year period with 25% each vesting on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date. The agreement also reflected the award of a restricted share grant of 20,000 shares of Company common stock under the 2007 Plan vesting at a rate of 33 1/3% per year starting on the first anniversary of the date of grant.

Under the terms of the agreements, if Ms. Chang is terminated other than for cause or she resigns for good reason, she is entitled to receive, in addition to unpaid salary and expenses and payment of accrued incentive compensation amounts, severance payments in the form of a continuation of her base salary in effect immediately prior to the termination for a period of nine months following the termination, which are payable in consideration for and only after she executes a general release containing terms reasonably satisfactory to PharmAthene. Termination “for cause” or “for good reason” is as defined above under “— Eric I. Richman,” except that non-renewal by PharmAthene of the agreement in accordance with the terms of the agreement does not qualify as a termination “for good reason” in the employment agreements for Ms. Chang.

On July 31, 2013, PharmAthene’s Board of Directors approved amendments to Ms. Chang’s employment agreement. Please see the section entitled “— Termination in Connection with the Merger” for a description of the amended provisions of Ms. Chang’s employment agreement, as they apply to the merger.

Please see the section entitled “— Severance Plan” below with respect to “change of control” events.

Francesca Cook

On April 18, 2008, PharmAthene entered into an employment agreement with Francesca Cook, under which Ms. Cook serves as PharmAthene’s Vice President, Policy & Government Affairs, for the period commencing on April 18, 2008 and ending on the first anniversary of such date. The term of the agreement is automatically extended for an additional year on each anniversary unless 90 days’ prior written notice of non-extension is provided.

Under the agreement, Ms Cook is paid an annual base salary of $231,612, subject to annual review and increase at the option of the Compensation Committee. Effective January 1, 2013, Ms. Cook’s base salary was increased to $294,392. Ms Cook is also eligible for an annual cash bonus of up to 30% of her base salary payable at the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee, and may be eligible for additional bonuses at the option and sole discretion of the Compensation Committee based on the achievement of certain pre-determined performance milestones.

105


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Under the terms of her agreement, if Ms. Cook is terminated other than for cause or she resigns for good reason, she is entitled to receive, in addition to unpaid salary and expenses and payment of accrued incentive compensation amounts, severance payments in the form of a continuation of her base salary in effect immediately prior to the termination for a period of six months following the termination (subject to a pending amendment that will extend the period to 12 months), which are payable in consideration for and only after she executes a general release containing terms reasonably satisfactory to PharmAthene. Termination “for cause” or “for good reason” is as defined above under “— Eric I. Richman,” except that non-renewal by PharmAthene of the agreement in accordance with the terms of the agreement does not qualify as a termination “for good reason” in the employment agreement for Ms. Cook.

Please also read the disclosure under “— Severance Plan” below with respect to “change of control” events.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control

Termination Without Cause/For Good Reason after a Change of Control

Severance Plan

On May 9, 2012, PharmAthene’s Board of Directors approved the following severance plan, or Severance Plan, for PharmAthene’s Chief Executive Officer and certain other executives, including PharmAthene’s Chief Financial Officer and each of PharmAthene’s Named Executive Officer, collectively referred to as the Covered Executives, which applies in case of a change of control. For PharmAthene’s President and Chief Executive Officer, the Severance Plan includes: (i) payments equal to 24 months’ worth of base salary; (ii) two times target annual cash bonus; (iii) health and other benefits continuation for 24 months; and (iv) a tax gross up for the excise tax payable on excess parachute payments under Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code. For the other Covered Executives, the Severance Plan includes (i) base salary continuation for 18 months; (ii) 1.5 times target annual cash bonus; (iii) health and other benefits continuation for 18 months; and (iv) in lieu of an excise tax gross up, a “best executive choice” provision under which the executive can elect either to receive his or her full severance benefit subject to the excise tax, if any, on excess parachute payments or to reduce his or her severance payment to the extent necessary to prevent the imposition of such excise tax. PharmAthene’s Board of Directors can modify or terminate the Severance Plan at any time, and PharmAthene’s Board of Directors has taken action to terminate the Severance Plan effective upon the closing of the merger.

The following table sets forth the amount of potential payments and value of benefits that each Named Executive Officer, who was serving as an executive officer on December 31, 2012, would have received if PharmAthene had terminated the executive officer’s employment on December 31, 2012 following a change of control as specified under the Severance Plan:

       
Name   Cash Payments(1)   Value of Benefits(2)   Value of Equity(3)   Excise Tax Gross Up(4)
Eric I. Richman   $ 1,417,280     $ 54,000              
Jordan P. Karp   $ 602,550     $ 40,000              
Francesca Cook   $ 551,985     $ 26,000              
Linda L. Chang   $ 585,000     $ 1,000              

(1) Represents the sum of (i) an amount equal to 24 months’ worth of base salary for Eric I. Richman and 18 months’ worth of base salary for all other Named Executive Officers, and (ii) an amount equal to 200% of the target annual cash bonus for Eric I. Richman and 150% of the target annual cash bonus for all other Named Executive Officers. According to their respective employment agreements, Mr. Richman’s target bonus is up to 60% of base salary and the target bonus for all other Named Executive Officers is up to 30% of base salary.
(2) Estimated value of health and life insurance and other benefits for 24 months and 18 months, respectively.
(3) The value of the automatic acceleration of the vesting of unvested stock options held by an executive is based on the difference between: (i) the market price of the shares of PharmAthene common stock underlying the unvested stock options held by such officer as of December 31, 2012, based on the $1.12 closing sale price of common stock on December 31, 2012, and (ii) the exercise prices of the options,

106


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

which range from $1.13 to $3.91 per share. The closing price per share of PharmAthene’s common stock is below the exercise price of unvested stock options, therefore, there is no intrinsic value associated with these unvested awards at December 31, 2012. Under Mr. Richman’s employment agreement, if he is terminated without cause or if he resigns for good reason within twelve months of a change of control and no new employment agreement has been entered into within 90 days of such change of control, all equity-based awards held by Mr. Richman would be deemed fully vested as of the date of termination. The acceleration provisions for the remaining Named Executive Officers are set forth in their stock option grant agreements.
(4) To the extent that Mr. Richman is subject to certain excise taxes under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, he is eligible for reimbursement of those excise taxes and any additional federal, state, local and excise tax resulting from such gross-up payments. The amount reported in the table is calculated assuming an excise tax rate of 20%. PharmAthene has assumed, solely for purposes of preparing this table, that the salary continuation portion of the severance constitutes “reasonable compensation” for the restrictive covenants to which the executive is bound following the termination of employment. Accordingly, PharmAthene has not treated the salary continuation portion as part of the amounts falling under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code. Such assumption may change at the time of an actual change of control. All other Named Executive Officers are subject to a “best executive choice” provision under which the executive can elect either to receive his or her full severance benefit subject to the excise tax, if any, on excess parachute payments or to reduce his or her severance payment to the extent necessary to prevent the imposition of such excise tax.

On July 31, 2013, PharmAthene's Board of Directors approved amendments to the employment agreements of each of Mr. Richman and Ms. Chang to provide for additional benefits upon the closing of the merger. Please see the section entitled “—Termination in Connection with the Merger.”

Termination Without Cause/For Good Reason in the Absence of a Change of Control

The following table sets forth the percentage of base salary and the stated period for continued employee benefits to which each of PharmAthene’s Named Executive Officers is entitled, if PharmAthene terminated the executive officer’s employment without cause or if the Named Executive Officer resigned for good reason on December 31, 2012, as set forth in the relevant employment agreement.

   
Name   Percentage of Annual Base Salary and Bonus   Stated
Period for
Continued Employee Benefits
Eric I. Richman   100% of salary for 12 months; lump-sum payment of accrued portion of target bonus and unpaid portion of prior year’s bonus   12 months
Jordan P. Karp   100% of salary for 6 months*  
Francesca Cook   100% of salary for 6 months*  
Linda L. Chang   100% of salary for 9 months  

* Subject to amendment of the employment agreement that will extend the period to 12 months.

The following table sets forth the amount of potential payments and value of benefits that each Named Executive Officer, who was serving as an executive officer on December 31, 2012, would have received if PharmAthene had terminated the executive officer’s employment without cause or if the Named Executive Officer resigned for good reason on December 31, 2012.

     
Name   Cash Payments(1)   Value of Benefits(2)   Value of Options
Eric I. Richman   $ 442,900       27,000        
Jordan P. Karp   $ 154,500**              
Francesca Cook   $ 141,535**              
Linda L. Chang   $ 225,000              

** Subject to amendment that will double this amount.

107


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(1) See preceding table. The amounts in the table above only reflect the salary portion of the cash payments.
(2) Estimated value of health and life insurance and other benefits. See preceding table.

Termination in Connection with the Merger

On July 31, 2013, PharmAthene’s Board of Directors approved amendments to the employment agreements of PharmAthene’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer that will become effective immediately upon completion of the merger (and only if the merger is completed) and which will provide substantially the same benefits that Mr. Richman and Ms. Chang would have been entitled to receive under the Severance Plan upon termination without cause or resignation for good reason within 12 months of a change of control of PharmAthene. Please see “— Termination Without Cause/For Good Reason After a Change of Control” for a description of such benefits. In addition to such benefits, the amendment will provide for acceleration of vesting of all outstanding equity-based awards held by Mr. Richman and Ms. Chang, and extend the exercise period applicable to their outstanding stock options until the third anniversary following their departure from service with PharmAthene and Linda Chang will also receive an additional lump sum payment for the costs associated with 18 months use of an automobile.

The following table sets forth the amount of potential payments and value of benefits that Mr. Richman and Ms. Chang would have received if their employment had been terminated in connection with the merger, assuming the merger had been completed on September 3, 2013.

         
Name   Cash Payments(1)   Value of Benefits(2)   Value of Options(3)   Excise Tax Gross Up(4)   Total
Eric I. Richman   $ 1,459,798     $ 54,000     $ 194,000     $ 599,144     $ 2,306,942  
Linda L. Chang   $ 620,100     $ 19,000     $ 114,000     $ 0     $ 753,100           

(1) Represents the sum of (i) an amount equal to 24 months’ worth of base salary for Mr. Richman and 18 months’ worth of base salary for Ms. Chang, (ii) an amount equal to 200% of the target annual cash bonus for Mr. Richman and 150% of the target annual cash bonus for Ms. Chang and (iii) for Ms. Chang, this amount includes a lump sum payment of $18,000 equal to the estimated costs associated with 18 months use of an automobile. According to their respective employment agreements, Mr. Richman’s target bonus is up to 60% of base salary and the target bonus for Ms. Chang is up to 30% of base salary.
(2) Estimated value of PharmAthene’s subsidy for group health insurance for 24 months and 18 months, respectively.
(3) The value of the automatic acceleration of the vesting of unvested stock options held by an executive is based on the difference between: (i) the market price of the shares of PharmAthene common stock underlying the unvested stock options held by such officer as of September 3, 2013, based on the average closing sale price of common stock from August 2, 2013 to August 8, 2013, representing the five business days following the announcement of the merger (i.e., $1.88), and (ii) the exercise price of the options, which range from $1.13 to $4.20 per share. Also included in this value is the value of unvested restricted shares. If the average closing price per share of PharmAthene’s common stock was below the exercise price of unvested stock option, there was no intrinsic value associated with that unvested award. On September 3, 2013. Under Mr. Richman’s employment agreement, if he is terminated without cause or if he resigns for good reason within twelve months of a change of control and no new employment agreement has been entered into within 90 days of such change of control, all equity-based awards held by Mr. Richman would be deemed fully vested as of the date of termination. The acceleration provisions for Ms. Chang are set forth in her stock option grant agreement.
(4) To the extent that Mr. Richman is subject to certain excise taxes under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, he is eligible for reimbursement of those excise taxes and any additional federal, state, local and excise tax resulting from such gross-up payments. The amount reported in the table is calculated assuming an excise tax rate of 20%. PharmAthene has assumed, for purposes of preparing this table, that $912,374 of Mr. Richman’s severance constitutes “reasonable compensation” for the restrictive covenants to which the executive is bound following the termination of employment. Accordingly, PharmAthene has not treated that portion of his severance as part of the amounts falling under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code. Such assumption may change at the time of an actual change of control. Linda Chang is subject to a “best executive choice” provision under which the executive can elect either to receive the amount other severance benefits, subject to the excise tax, if any, payable on

108


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

excess parachute payments, or to reduce her severance payment to the extent necessary to prevent the imposition of such avoid triggering excise tax on such payment.

Indemnification and Insurance

PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation and Delaware law provides that PharmAthene will indemnify and hold harmless each present and former director and officer of PharmAthene, with respect to acts or omissions occurring or alleged to have occurred at or prior to completion of the merger, to the fullest extent permitted under applicable law. The executive officers and directors of PharmAthene have rights to indemnification, advancement of expenses, and director and officer liability insurance that will survive the completion of the merger.

Interests of Theraclone’s Directors and Officers in the Merger

In considering the recommendation of the Theraclone Board of Directors to Theraclone stockholders to approve the merger and to adopt and approve the Merger Agreement and the other matters to be acted upon by Theraclone stockholders in the Theraclone written consent, Theraclone stockholders should be aware that members of the Theraclone Board of Directors and Theraclone’s officers have interests in the merger that may be different from, in addition to, or may conflict with the interests of Theraclone stockholders. These interests relate to or arise from, among other things:

The beneficial ownership interests of Theraclone directors and officers in shares of Theraclone capital stock and securities to be converted into PharmAthene common stock and rights to purchase PharmAthene common stock in the merger.
The agreement that Steven Gillis, Ph.D., Wende S. Hutton and Clifford J. Stocks, each a Theraclone director, will continue to serve on the Board of Directors of the combined company following the consummation of the merger.
The assumption of all stock options held by the Theraclone executive officers and board members upon the consummation of the merger.
The agreement that Mr. Stocks, Russ Hawkinson, Eleanor Ramos, M.D., and Kristine Swiderek, Ph.D. each a Theraclone executive officer, will continue to serve as executive officers of the combined company following the consummation of the merger and will enter into new employment agreements with the combined company.
The right to continued indemnification and insurance coverage for directors and executive officers of Theraclone following completion of the merger, pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, as described in more detail below.

The Theraclone Board of Directors was aware of these potential conflicts of interest and considered them, among other matters, in reaching its decision to approve the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, and to recommend that Theraclone stockholders approve the merger and related matters. Other than full disclosure of these potential conflicts of interest, the Theraclone Board of Directors did not take any other steps to alleviate such potential conflicts of interest since it did not consider such potential conflicts of interest to be material in connection with its decision to approve the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger.

Ownership Interests

As of September 3, 2013, the latest practicable date before the filing of this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation, directors and executive officers of Theraclone, together with their respective affiliates, owned and were entitled to vote, in the aggregate, 24,552,617 shares of Theraclone capital stock, or approximately 62% of the shares of Theraclone capital stock outstanding on that date. Assuming the merger had been completed as of such date, all directors and executive officers of Theraclone, together with their respective affiliates, would beneficially own, in the aggregate, 27% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the combined company.

109


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

For a more complete discussion of the ownership interests of the directors and executive officers of Theraclone, see the sections entitled “PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS OF THERACLONE” and “PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS OF THE COMBINED COMPANY.”

Directors

Following completion of the merger, Mr. Gillis and Ms. Hutton are expected to receive cash and equity compensation in accordance with PharmAthene’s equity compensation policies for non-employee directors as described in the section “Interests of PharmAthene’s Directors and Officers in the Merger—Continuing Directors.”

Stock Options

At the Effective Time of the merger, each Theraclone stock option to purchase Theraclone common stock not exercised prior to the merger will be assumed by PharmAthene and become exercisable for such number of shares of PharmAthene common stock as is determined by multiplying the number of shares of Theraclone common stock subject to the option by the Exchange Ratio and rounding that result down to the nearest whole number of shares of PharmAthene common stock, and at a per share exercise price as is determined by dividing the existing exercise price of the option by the Exchange Ratio and rounding that result up to the nearest whole cent.

The table below sets forth, as of September 3, 2013, information with respect to options held by each of the executive officers and directors of Theraclone as of such date.

 
Name   Number of Shares of Common Stock Subject to Options
Steven Gillis, Ph.D.     1,220,000 (1) 
Russ Hawkinson     579,375 (1) 
Wende S. Hutton      
Christopher Mirabelli      
Eleanor Ramos, M.D.     499,800 (1) 
Wendye Robbins     121,915 (2) 
Clifford J. Stocks     2,816,671 (1) 
Kristine Swiderek, Ph.D.     414,985 (1) 

(1) As of September 3, 2013, 1,200,000 of Dr. Gillis’ options were vested, 461,718 of Mr. Hawkinson’s options were vested, 229,321 of Dr. Ramos’ options were vested, 810,590 of Mr. Stocks’ options were vested and 222,502 of Dr. Swiderek’s options were vested.
(2) As of September 3, 2013, 27,938 of Ms. Robbins options were vested. Upon completion of the merger, Ms. Robbins will not continue as a board member of the combined company and, therefore, her unvested options as of the Effective Date will terminate upon completion of the merger.

Employment Agreements and Severance and Change in Control Agreements

It is expected that, upon completion of the merger, Mr. Stocks, Mr. Hawkinson, Dr. Ramos and Dr. Swiderek will enter into new employment agreements with the combined company.

Indemnification and Insurance

The Merger Agreement provides that the combined company will continue to indemnify and hold harmless each present and former director and officer of Theraclone, with respect to acts or omissions occurring or alleged to have occurred at or prior to completion of the merger, to the fullest extent permitted under applicable law.

The Merger Agreement also provides that, prior to completion of the merger, Theraclone may purchase and maintain for a period of six years following completion of the merger, a directors’ and officers’ liability “tail” insurance policy covering the present and former directors and officers of Theraclone for events occurring prior to completion of the merger. If Theraclone does not obtain “tail” insurance, then, for a period

110


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

of six years from the following completion of the merger, PharmAthene shall cause the surviving subsidiary to maintain in effect the current policies of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance and fiduciary liability insurance maintained by Theraclone with respect to matters arising on or before the completion of the merger.

Regulatory Approvals

Neither PharmAthene nor Theraclone is required to make any filings or to obtain approvals or clearances from any antitrust regulatory authorities in the United States or other countries to consummate the merger. In the United States, PharmAthene must comply with applicable federal and state securities laws in connection with the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock in the merger, including the filing with the SEC of the registration statement of which this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation is a part. In addition, as described in more detail below, PharmAthene must comply with applicable rules of the NYSE MKT which require the preparation and approval of an additional listing application for the shares of PharmAthene common stock issuable in connection with the merger.

NYSE MKT Listing of PharmAthene Common Stock

PharmAthene common stock currently is listed on the NYSE MKT under the symbol “PIP”. PharmAthene has filed an additional listing application for the shares of PharmAthene issuable in connection with the merger.

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger

PharmAthene and Theraclone intend the merger to qualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code and have generally agreed not to take any action that would prevent the merger from qualifying as a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code. For a more complete discussion of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger, see the section entitled “CERTAIN MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER.”

Anticipated Accounting Treatment

Under ASC 805, the merger is expected to be accounted for using acquisition accounting pursuant to which PharmAthene is considered the acquiring entity for accounting purposes. As such, PharmAthene expects to allocate the total purchase consideration to Theraclone’s tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values at the date of the completion of the merger.

Final valuations of Theraclone’s property, plant and equipment, and identifiable intangible and other assets acquired have not yet been completed as management is still reviewing the existence, characteristics and useful lives of Theraclone’s tangible and intangible assets. The completion of the valuation could result in significantly different amortization expenses and balance sheet classifications than those presented in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information included in this prospectus. After completion of the merger, the results of operations of both PharmAthene and Theraclone will be included in the financial statements of PharmAthene.

For further discussion of the accounting treatment, see the section entitled “SELECTED HISTORICAL AND UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION.”

Appraisal Rights

PharmAthene

If the merger is completed, PharmAthene stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights under Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

Theraclone

If the merger is completed, Theraclone stockholders who have not waived such rights are entitled to appraisal rights under Section 262, provided that they comply with the conditions established by Section 262.

This section is intended to provide a brief summary of the material provisions of the Delaware statutory procedures that a stockholder must follow in order to seek and perfect appraisal rights. However, this

111


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

summary is not a complete statement of all applicable requirements, and it is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the relevant provisions of Delaware law, which are attached to this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation as Annex G. The following summary does not constitute any legal or other advice, nor does it constitute a recommendation that Theraclone stockholders exercise their appraisal rights under Section 262. Failure to follow precisely any of the statutory procedures set forth in Annex G may result in a termination or waiver of appraisal rights.

A record holder of shares of Theraclone capital stock who makes the demand described below with respect to such shares, who continuously holds such shares through the Effective Time, who submits a written demand for appraisal to Theraclone in compliance with the statutory requirements of Section 262, and who does not vote in favor of the merger or consent thereto in writing will be entitled to an appraisal by the Delaware Court of Chancery of the fair value of his, her or its shares of Theraclone capital stock in lieu of the consideration that such stockholder would otherwise be entitled to receive pursuant to the Merger Agreement. All references in this summary of appraisal rights to a “stockholder” or “holders of shares of Theraclone capital stock” are to the record holder or holders of shares of Theraclone capital stock.

Under Section 262, because Theraclone is seeking the written consent of its stockholders to approve the merger, Theraclone must notify each of the holders of its stock for whom appraisal rights are available that such appraisal rights are available and include in such notice a copy of Section 262. This proxy statement/prospectus/written consent constitutes such notice to the record holders of Theraclone capital stock and a copy of Section 262 is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation as Annex G.

Theraclone stockholders who desire to exercise their appraisal rights must satisfy all of the conditions of Section 262. Those conditions include the following:

Theraclone stockholders electing to exercise appraisal rights must not vote “for” the merger. Voting “for” the merger will result in the waiver of appraisal rights. Also, because a submitted written consent not marked “against” or “abstain” will be voted “for” the merger, the submission of a written consent not marked “against” or “abstain” will result in the waiver of appraisal rights.

A written demand for appraisal of shares of Theraclone capital stock must be delivered to Theraclone before the date written consent must be received. The written demand for appraisal should specify the Theraclone stockholder’s name and mailing address, and that such stockholder is thereby demanding appraisal of his, her or its shares of Theraclone capital stock. The written demand for appraisal of shares of Theraclone capital stock is in addition to and separate from a vote against the merger or an abstention from such vote. Failure to return your written consent, voting against, or abstaining from voting on, the merger will not satisfy a stockholder’s obligation to make a written demand for appraisal. Failure to make a written demand for appraisal prior to delivery of your written consent will constitute a waiver of appraisal rights.

A demand for appraisal must be executed by or for the Theraclone stockholder of record, fully and correctly, as such stockholder’s name appears on the stock certificate. If the shares are owned of record in a fiduciary capacity, such as by a trustee, guardian or custodian, this demand must be executed by or for the fiduciary. If the shares of Theraclone capital stock are owned by or for more than one person, as in a joint tenancy or tenancy in common, such demand must be executed by or for all joint owners. An authorized agent, including an agent for two or more joint owners, may execute the demand for appraisal for a Theraclone stockholder of record. However, the agent must identify such record holder and expressly disclose the fact that, in exercising the demand, he is acting as agent for such record holder. A person having a beneficial interest in Theraclone capital stock held of record in the name of another person, such as a broker or nominee, must act promptly to cause the record holder to follow the steps summarized below in a timely manner to perfect appraisal rights on behalf of the beneficial owners.

A Theraclone stockholder who elects to exercise appraisal rights should mail or deliver his, her or its written demand to Theraclone by faxing it to Theraclone’s legal counsel, Fenwick & West LLP, Attention: Ellen Welichko, at (206) 389-4511, by emailing a .pdf copy of your written consent to ewelichko@fenwick.com, or by mailing your written consent to Fenwick & West LLP at 1191 Second Avenue, 10th Floor, Seattle, Washington 98101, Attention: Ellen Welichko.

112


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Within 10 days after the Effective Time, Theraclone must provide notice of the Effective Time to all Theraclone stockholders who have complied with Section 262 and have not voted in favor of the merger.

Within 120 days after the Effective Time, either Theraclone or any Theraclone stockholder who has complied with the required conditions of Section 262 may file a petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery, with a copy served on Theraclone in the case of a petition filed by an Theraclone stockholder, demanding a determination of the fair value of the shares of Theraclone capital stock held by all Theraclone stockholders seeking to exercise appraisal rights. There is no present intent on the part of Theraclone to file an appraisal petition, and Theraclone stockholders seeking to exercise appraisal rights should not assume that Theraclone will file such a petition or that Theraclone will initiate any negotiations with respect to the fair value of such shares. Accordingly, Theraclone stockholders who desire to have their shares of Theraclone capital stock appraised should initiate any petitions necessary for the perfection of their appraisal rights within the time periods and in the manner prescribed in Section 262. Failure to file a petition for appraisal within the time period specified in Section 262 could result in a loss of appraisal rights.

Within 120 days after the Effective Time, any Theraclone stockholder who has satisfied the requirements of Section 262 will be entitled, upon written request, to receive from Theraclone a statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares of Theraclone common stock and Theraclone preferred stock not voting in favor of the merger and with respect to which demands for appraisal were received by Theraclone and the aggregate number of holders of such shares. Such statement must be mailed within 10 days after the Theraclone stockholder’s request has been received by Theraclone or within 10 days after the expiration of the period for the delivery of demands as described above, whichever is later.

If a petition for an appraisal is timely filed and a copy thereof is served upon Theraclone, Theraclone will then be obligated, within 20 days after such service, to file in the office of the Delaware Register in Chancery, or the Register, a duly verified list containing the names and addresses of all Theraclone stockholders who have demanded an appraisal of their shares of Theraclone capital stock and with whom agreements as to the value of such shares have not been reached. Upon notice to the Theraclone stockholders, as required by the Delaware Court of Chancery, at a hearing on such petition, the Delaware Court of Chancery will determine which Theraclone stockholders are entitled to appraisal rights. The Delaware Court of Chancery may require the Theraclone stockholders who have demanded an appraisal for their shares of Theraclone capital stock and who hold such stock represented by certificates to submit their certificates of stock to the Register for notation thereon of the pendency of the appraisal proceedings; and if any Theraclone stockholder fails to comply with such direction, the Delaware Court of Chancery may dismiss the proceedings as to such stockholder. Where proceedings are not dismissed, the Delaware Court of Chancery will appraise the shares of Theraclone capital stock owned by such stockholders, determining the fair value of such shares exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger. When the fair value has been determined, the Delaware Court of Chancery will direct the payment of such value upon surrender by those stockholders of the certificates representing their shares of Theraclone capital stock. Unless the Delaware Court of Chancery in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause shown, interest from the Effective Time through the date of payment of the judgment will be compounded quarterly and will accrue at five percent over the Federal Reserve discount rate (including any surcharge) as established from time to time during the period between the Effective Time and the date of payment of the judgment.

Although the Board of Directors of Theraclone believes that the merger consideration is fair, no representation is made as to the outcome of the appraisal of fair value as would be determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery, and Theraclone stockholders should recognize that such an appraisal could result in a determination of a value higher or lower than, or the same as, the consideration they would receive pursuant to the Merger Agreement. Moreover, Theraclone does not anticipate offering more than the merger consideration to any Theraclone stockholder exercising appraisal rights and reserves the right to assert in any appraisal proceeding, that, for purposes of Section 262, the “fair value” of a share of Theraclone capital stock is less than the merger consideration. In determining “fair value,” the Delaware Court of Chancery is required to take into account all relevant factors. In Weinberger v. UOP, Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court discussed the factors that could be considered in determining fair value in an appraisal proceeding, stating that “proof of value by any techniques or methods which are generally considered acceptable in the financial community and otherwise admissible in court” should be considered and that “fair price obviously requires consideration of

113


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

all relevant factors involving the value of a company.” The Delaware Supreme Court has stated that in making this determination of fair value, the court must consider market value, asset value, dividends, earnings prospects, the nature of the enterprise and any other facts which could be ascertained as of the date of the merger which shed any light on the future prospects of the merged corporation. Section 262 provides that fair value is to be “exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger.” In Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court stated that such exclusion is a “narrow exclusion that does not encompass known elements of value,” but which rather applies only to the speculative elements of value arising from such accomplishment or expectation. In Weinberger, the Delaware Supreme Court also stated that “elements of future value, including the nature of the enterprise, which are known or susceptible of proof as of the date of the merger and not the product of speculation, may be considered.” In addition, Delaware courts have decided that the statutory appraisal remedy, depending on factual circumstances, may or may not be a dissenting stockholder’s exclusive remedy.

The cost of the appraisal proceeding, which does not include attorneys’ or experts’ fees, may be determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery and imposed upon the dissenting Theraclone stockholder(s) and/or Theraclone as the Delaware Court of Chancery deems equitable under the circumstances. Each dissenting Theraclone stockholder is responsible for his, her or its attorneys’ and expert witness fees and expenses, although, upon application of a dissenting Theraclone stockholder, the Delaware Court of Chancery may order that all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any dissenting Theraclone stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding, including without limitation reasonable attorneys’ fees and the fees and expenses of experts, be charged pro rata against the value of all shares of Theraclone capital stock entitled to appraisal.

Any Theraclone stockholder who has duly demanded appraisal in compliance with Section 262 will not, after the Effective Time, be entitled to vote for any purpose any shares of Theraclone capital stock subject to such demand or to receive payment of dividends or other distributions on such shares, except for dividends or distributions payable to Theraclone stockholders of record at a date prior to the Effective Time.

At any time within 60 days after the Effective Time, any Theraclone stockholder will have the right to withdraw his, her or its demand for appraisal and to accept the terms offered in the Merger Agreement. After this period, a Theraclone stockholder may withdraw his, her or its demand for appraisal and receive payment for his, her or its shares as provided in the Merger Agreement only with the consent of Theraclone. If no petition for appraisal is filed with the Delaware Court of Chancery within 120 days after the Effective Time, or if any Theraclone stockholder otherwise fails to perfect, successfully withdraws, or loses such holder’s appraisal rights, then such stockholder’s right to appraisal will cease and such stockholder’s shares of Theraclone capital stock will be deemed to have been converted at the Effective Time into the right to receive the consideration that such Theraclone stockholder would otherwise be entitled to receive pursuant to the Merger Agreement. Inasmuch as Theraclone has no obligation to file such a petition, any Theraclone stockholder who desires a petition to be filed is advised to file it on a timely basis. Any Theraclone stockholder may withdraw such stockholder’s demand for appraisal by delivering to Theraclone a written withdrawal of his, her or its demand for appraisal and acceptance of the merger consideration, except that (i) any such attempt to withdraw made more than 60 days after the Effective Time will require written approval of Theraclone and (ii) no appraisal proceeding in the Delaware Court of Chancery will be dismissed as to any Theraclone stockholder who commenced or joined such proceeding as a named party without the approval of the Delaware Court of Chancery, and such approval may be conditioned upon such terms as the Delaware Court of Chancery deems just.

Failure by any Theraclone stockholder to comply fully with the procedures described above and set forth in Annex G to this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation may result in the loss of such stockholder’s appraisal rights. In view of the complexity of exercising appraisal rights under Delaware law, any Theraclone stockholder considering exercising these rights should consult with legal counsel.

114


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

THE MERGER AGREEMENT

The following is a summary of selected provisions of the Merger Agreement. While PharmAthene, Merger Sub, and Theraclone believe that this description covers the material terms of the Merger Agreement, it may not contain all of the information that is important to you. The Merger Agreement has been attached as Annex A to this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation to provide you with information regarding its terms. It is not intended to provide any other factual information about PharmAthene, Merger Sub, or Theraclone. The following description does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Merger Agreement. You should refer to the full text of the Merger Agreement for details of the merger and the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement.

The Merger Agreement contains representations and warranties that PharmAthene and Merger Sub, on the one hand, and Theraclone, on the other hand, have made to one another as of specific dates. These representations and warranties have been made for the benefit of the other parties to the Merger Agreement and may be intended not as statements of fact but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements prove to be incorrect. In addition, the assertions embodied in the representations and warranties are qualified by information in confidential disclosure schedules exchanged by the parties in connection with signing the Merger Agreement. While PharmAthene and Theraclone do not believe that these disclosure schedules contain information required to be publicly disclosed under the applicable securities laws, other than information that has already been so disclosed, the disclosure schedules do contain information that modifies, qualifies and creates exceptions to the representations and warranties set forth in the attached Merger Agreement. Accordingly, you should not rely on the representations and warranties as current characterizations of factual information about PharmAthene or Theraclone, because they were made as of specific dates, may be intended merely as a risk allocation mechanism between PharmAthene and Theraclone and are modified by the disclosure schedules.

General

Under the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of PharmAthene incorporated by PharmAthene in connection with the merger, will merge with and into Theraclone, with Theraclone continuing as a wholly owned subsidiary of PharmAthene.

Effective Time of the Merger

The Merger Agreement requires the parties to consummate the merger on the second business day after all of the conditions to the consummation of the merger contained in the Merger Agreement are satisfied or waived, including the adoption and the approval of the Merger Agreement by Theraclone’s stockholders and the approval by PharmAthene’s stockholders of the issuance of PharmAthene common stock, or such other date as PharmAthene and Theraclone may mutually agree in writing. The merger will become effective upon the filing of a certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, or at such later time as is agreed by PharmAthene and Theraclone and specified in the certificate of merger. Neither PharmAthene nor Theraclone can predict the exact timing of the consummation of the merger.

Merger Consideration

All outstanding shares of Theraclone preferred stock will be converted into shares of Theraclone common stock on a one-for-one basis immediately prior to the Effective Time, subject to the approval of such conversion by Theraclone’s preferred stockholders. At the Effective Time, all outstanding shares of Theraclone common stock will be converted into shares of PharmAthene common stock. Upon completion of the merger, the PharmAthene security holders will own 50% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, and Theraclone security holders will own 50% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, in each case, on an as converted and fully diluted basis but excluding PharmAthene warrants and options with an exercise price of more than $2.50 per share. Based on the number of outstanding securities of each company as of September 3, 2013, (i) if no PharmAthene or Theraclone options or warrants are exercised prior to the completion of the merger, PharmAthene and Theraclone security holders would own, respectively, approximately 54.1% and 45.9% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the combined company and (ii) if PharmAthene warrants and options with an exercise price of more than $2.50 per share are exercised, to the extent such exercises occur, PharmAthene and Theraclone security holders could own, respectively, between approximately 51.5% and 50.0% and 48.5% and 50.0% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, on a fully diluted basis.

115


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

At the Effective Time:

each share of Theraclone common stock outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time will automatically be converted into the right to receive a number of shares of PharmAthene common stock equal to the quotient obtained by dividing the fully diluted equity (as defined below) of PharmAthene by the fully diluted equity of Theraclone, less a pro rata share of PharmAthene common stock representing five percent of the merger consideration issuable to the stockholders of Theraclone, which will be held in escrow pursuant to the terms of the escrow agreement, as described in further detail below, except that holders of Theraclone common stock will receive cash in lieu of fractional shares;
each option to purchase shares of Theraclone common stock outstanding and unexercised immediately prior to the Effective Time will be assumed by PharmAthene and will become an option to purchase that number of shares of the common stock of the combined company equal to the product of (i) the number of Theraclone shares of common stock underlying the option and (ii) the quotient obtained by dividing the fully diluted equity of PharmAthene by the fully diluted equity of Theraclone; and
each warrant to purchase shares of Theraclone capital stock outstanding and not terminated or exercised immediately prior to the Effective Time will be assumed by PharmAthene and will become a warrant to purchase that number of shares of PharmAthene common stock equal to the product of (i) the number of Theraclone shares of capital stock underlying the warrant and (ii) the quotient obtained by dividing the fully diluted equity of PharmAthene by the fully diluted equity of Theraclone.

Fully diluted equity means, with respect to PharmAthene, the total number of shares outstanding of PharmAthene common stock, assuming full conversion or exercise of all then-outstanding options and warrants, which, in each case, have an exercise price less than or equal to $2.50 per share, and convertible securities, and with respect to Theraclone, the total number of shares outstanding of Theraclone common stock, assuming full conversion or exercise of all then-outstanding options and warrants and all convertible securities.

At the Effective Time, five percent of the merger consideration issuable to the stockholders of Theraclone will be deposited with Citibank, N.A., as escrow agent under a separate escrow agreement to be entered into prior to the completion of the merger. These escrow shares will be held in escrow for a period of nine months after the closing date and will serve to secure the Theraclone stockholders’ indemnification obligations under the Merger Agreement. The escrow agreement is described in further detail under “— Indemnification Obligations” below.

Fractional Shares

No fractional shares of PharmAthene common stock will be issuable pursuant to the merger to Theraclone’s stockholders. Instead, each Theraclone stockholder who would otherwise be entitled to receive a fraction of a share of PharmAthene common stock, after aggregating all fractional shares of PharmAthene common stock issuable to such stockholder, will be entitled to receive in cash the dollar amount, rounded to the nearest whole cent determined by multiplying such fraction by the closing price of a share of PharmAthene common stock as quoted on NYSE MKT on the date the merger becomes effective.

Exchange of Stock Certificates

The Merger Agreement provides that, at the Effective Time, PharmAthene will deposit with Continental Stock Transfer and Trust Company stock certificates representing the shares of PharmAthene common stock issuable to the Theraclone stockholders, less the escrow shares.

The Merger Agreement provides that, as soon as reasonably practicable after the Effective Time, and in any event within five business days, the exchange agent will mail to each record holder of Theraclone common stock immediately prior to the Effective Time a letter of transmittal and instructions for surrendering and exchanging the record holder’s Theraclone stock certificates for shares of PharmAthene common stock. Upon surrender of a Theraclone stock certificate for exchange to the exchange agent, together with a duly signed letter of transmittal and such other documents as the exchange agent may reasonably require, the

116


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone stock certificate surrendered will be cancelled and the holder of the Theraclone stock certificate will be entitled to receive the following:

a certificate representing the number of whole shares of PharmAthene common stock that such holder has the right to receive pursuant to the provisions of the Merger Agreement;
dividends or other distributions, if any, declared or made with respect to PharmAthene common stock with a record date after the Effective Time; and
in lieu of any fractional share of PharmAthene common stock and at the Effective Time, all holders of certificates representing shares of Theraclone common stock that were outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time will cease to have any rights as stockholders of Theraclone. In addition, no transfer of Theraclone common stock after the Effective Time will be registered on the stock transfer books of Theraclone.

If any Theraclone stock certificate has been lost, stolen or destroyed, PharmAthene may, in its discretion, and as a condition to the delivery of any shares of PharmAthene common stock, the exchange agent will require the owner of such lost, stolen or destroyed certificate to deliver an affidavit claiming such certificate has been lost, stolen or destroyed.

From and after the Effective Time, until it is surrendered, each certificate that previously evidenced Theraclone stock will be deemed to represent only the right to receive shares of PharmAthene common stock and cash in lieu of any fractional share of PharmAthene common stock. PharmAthene will not pay dividends or other distributions on any shares of PharmAthene common stock to be issued in exchange for any unsurrendered Theraclone stock certificate until the Theraclone stock certificate is surrendered as provided in the Merger Agreement.

Indemnification Obligations

The Theraclone stockholders will indemnify and hold harmless PharmAthene and its directors, officers, stockholders, employees, agents, subsidiaries and affiliates, and will reimburse such persons for, any loss, liability, damage or expense, including reasonable out-of-pocket costs of investigation and defense of claims and reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred by such persons arising for any breach of any representation, warranty covenant, or agreement of Theraclone in the Merger Agreement for a period of nine months after the closing date. No Theraclone stockholder will have any obligation to indemnify the persons described above unless all losses for all indemnification claims made by such persons exceeds $1,000,000 in the aggregate, in which event the Theraclone stockholders will be liable for all losses from the first dollar above $1,000,000. Absent fraud or willful misconduct, no Theraclone stockholder will be liable for any losses in excess of their pro rata share of the escrowed shares.

At the Effective Time, five percent of the merger consideration issuable to the stockholders of Theraclone will be deposited with Citibank, N.A., as escrow agent under a separate escrow agreement to be entered into prior to the completion of the merger. These Escrow Shares will serve to secure the Theraclone stockholders’ indemnification obligations under the Merger Agreement.

Neither PharmAthene nor the surviving subsidiary will have any obligation to indemnify the Theraclone stockholders for any breach of any representation or warranty made by, or any covenant or agreement of, PharmAthene or Merger Sub under the Merger Agreement.

Directors and Officers of PharmAthene following the Merger

Following the merger, the combined company’s Board of Directors will initially be composed of nine directors, five of whom will be designated by PharmAthene, Mitch Sayare, Ph.D., John M. Gill, Brian A. Markison, Eric I. Richman and Derace L. Schaffer, M.D., and four of whom will be designated by Theraclone, Steven Gillis, Ph.D., Wende S. Hutton, Clifford J. Stocks and          .

Effective as of the closing of the merger, the combined company’s executive officers will be Clifford J. Stocks (Chief Executive Officer), Francesca M. Cook (Senior Vice President, Policy and Government Affairs), Russ Hawkinson (Chief Financial Officer), Jordan P. Karp (Senior Vice President and General Counsel),

117


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Eleanor Ramos, M.D. (Chief Medical Officer) and Kristine Swiderek, Ph.D. (Chief Scientific Officer). Each of these executive officers of the combined company currently holds the same position at his or her respective company.

Conditions to Completion of the Merger

Each party’s obligation to complete the merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver by each of the parties, at or before the merger, of various conditions, which include the following:

stockholders of Theraclone must have approved and adopted the merger
stockholders of PharmAthene must have approved the issuance of PharmAthene common stock in the merger and an amendment to PharmAthene’s certificate of incorporation to increase the authorized number of shares of common stock;
the election of nine directors to PharmAthene’s Board of Directors, including five nominees designated by PharmAthene and four nominees designated by Theraclone;
there must not be any law, judgment, injunction, order or decree by any court or other tribunal of competent jurisdiction that prohibits the consummation of the merger;
the shares of PharmAthene common stock to be issued in the merger must be approved for listing on NYSE MKT, subject to official notice of issuance;
the registration statement on Form S-4, of which this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation is a part, must have been declared effective by the SEC in accordance with the Securities Act and must not be subject to any stop order or proceeding, or any proceeding threatened by the SEC, seeking a stop order; and
an amendment to the PharmAthene Bylaws shall have been approved by the PharmAthene stockholders that provides that, effective as of the Effective Time, Clifford J. Stocks may not be removed from his position as Chief Executive Officer of PharmAthene without the approval of at least 66 2/3% of the Board of Directors of PharmAthene, until the earliest of (a) July 31, 2015, (b) such time as there is a period longer than 30 days in which less than five PharmAthene board designees serve on the combined company’s Board of Directors, and (c) the full settlement or final, non-appealable resolution of PharmAthene’s civil action against SIGA, or the SIGA Resolution; provided, however, that, in the event of that the SIGA Resolution occurs prior to the first anniversary of the completion of the merger, the SIGA Resolution will be deemed to have occurred on the first anniversary of the closing of the merger.

In addition, each party’s obligation to complete the merger is further subject to the satisfaction or waiver by that party of the following additional conditions:

representations and warranties of the other party in the Merger Agreement must be true and correct on the date of the Merger Agreement and on the closing date of the merger with the same force and effect as if made on the date on which the merger is to be completed or, if such representations and warranties address matters as of a particular date, then as of that particular date, except where the failure of these representations and warranties to be true and correct, individually or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the party making the representations and warranties;
the other party to the Merger Agreement must have performed or complied with in all material respects all obligations and agreements required to be performed or complied with by it on or before the closing of the merger;
the other party must have delivered certain certificates and other documents required under the Merger Agreement for the closing of the merger, including the escrow agreement and Board Composition Agreement; and

118


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

there shall have been no change, effect, event, occurrence, or state of facts that is or would reasonably be expected to be materially adverse to the assets, properties, business or financial condition or results of operations of such party or prevent or materially delay the performance by such party of any of its obligations under the Merger Agreement.

In addition, the obligation of PharmAthene and Merger Sub to complete the merger is further subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the following conditions:

No more than five percent of the total issued and outstanding shares of PharmAthene common stock have delivered written demands for appraisal in accordance with the DGCL. (Note that PharmAthene stockholders do not have appraisal rights.)
The post-closing lock-up agreement entered into by certain stockholders of Theraclone in connection with the execution of the Merger Agreement shall continue to be in full force and effect.
All $8,000,000 of capital committed to Theraclone pursuant to its Series B-1 Preferred Stock and Warrant Purchase and Exchange Agreement shall have been received by Theraclone.

No Solicitation

PharmAthene agreed that, except as described below, it will not, and will not permit any of its subsidiaries, or authorize or permit any of its or their officers, directors, employees, or other agents to, directly or indirectly:

solicit, initiate, or knowingly encourage the submission of any inquiries concerning, or the making of any proposal or offer that constitutes, or could reasonably be expected to lead to, a PharmAthene takeover proposal, as defined in the Merger Agreement and summarized below;
enter into any agreement, letter of intent, agreement in principle or other similar instrument with respect to any PharmAthene takeover proposal,
provide any non-public information regarding PharmAthene or its subsidiaries to any third party or engage in any negotiations or discussions in connection with any PharmAthene takeover proposal or otherwise knowingly cooperate with or assist or participate in or knowingly encourage any such negotiations or discussions,
approve or recommend a PharmAthene takeover proposal, or resolve or authorize an intention to approve or recommend, or execute or enter into, any acquisition agreement;
submit to the stockholders of PharmAthene for their approval or adoption any PharmAthene takeover proposal;
withdraw, rescind, qualify or modify, or propose publicly to withdraw, rescind, qualify or modify, in a manner adverse to Theraclone, the recommendation by the PharmAthene Board of Directors to vote in favor of the merger or the approval by the PharmAthene Board of Directors or such committee of the Merger Agreement or the merger or resolve or authorize an intention to do any of the foregoing;
if a tender offer or exchange offer for shares of capital stock of PharmAthene that constitutes an PharmAthene takeover proposal is commenced, fail to publicly recommend against acceptance of such tender offer or exchange offer by the stockholders of PharmAthene (taking no position with respect to the acceptance of such tender offer or exchange offer by the stockholders of PharmAthene, shall constitute a failure to recommend against acceptance of such tender offer or exchange offer) within ten business days after commencement thereof or fail to reaffirm the PharmAthene recommendation within four business days after Theraclone so requests in writing;
approve (by resolution of the PharmAthene Board of Directors, any committee thereof or otherwise), support, enter into or adopt or recommend to any holders of PharmAthene shares, or propose any of the foregoing with respect to, any letter of intent or similar document, contract, commitment or

119


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

agreement in principle (whether written or oral, binding or nonbinding) that may reasonably be expected to cause PharmAthene to abandon, terminate or fail to consummate the Merger Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby; or
agree or publicly announce any intention to take any of the foregoing actions.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the PharmAthene Board of Directors may, at any time prior to closing:

in response to an unsolicited, bona fide, written PharmAthene superior proposal, if the PharmAthene Board of Directors reasonably determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside counsel and its outside financial advisor, that failing to take the following action would be a breach of its fiduciary duties under applicable law:
withdraw its recommendation that PharmAthene consummate the merger, or
terminate this Agreement, or
in the event that, after the date hereof, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware shall have rendered a substantive decision on the merits in that certain litigation matter between PharmAthene and SIGA, and, within 20 business days after the entry of such decision, the PharmAthene Board of Directors determines, in its reasonable discretion, that, as a result of such decision, it can no longer consider the merger a merger of equals,
withdraw its recommendation that PharmAthene consummate the merger, or
terminate the Merger Agreement.

A PharmAthene takeover proposal means any proposal or offer from any person relating to any of the following:

any direct or indirect acquisition or purchase (including any sale, lease, exchange, transfer or license) of a business or assets that constitutes 50% or more of the net revenues, net income or the assets of PharmAthene and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis;
any direct or indirect acquisition or purchase of 50% or more of the equity capital stock of PharmAthene or any of its subsidiaries,
tender offer or exchange offer that if consummated would result in any person beneficially owning 50% of the equity capital stock of PharmAthene or any of its subsidiaries; or
merger, consolidation, business combination, recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution or similar transaction involving PharmAthene or any of its subsidiaries, in each case that does not include Theraclone following the merger contemplated by the Merger Agreement.

However, before (i) obtaining the applicable PharmAthene stockholders approval required to consummate the merger and (ii) such time, if any, that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware shall have rendered a substantive decision on the merits in that certain litigation matter between PharmAthene and SIGA and the PharmAthene Board of Directors makes a timely determination that, as a result of such decision, it can no longer consider the merger a merger of equals, PharmAthene or its representatives may furnish nonpublic information regarding such party and its subsidiaries to, and may enter into negotiations or discussions with, any third party making such PharmAthene takeover proposal made or received after the date of the Merger Agreement and its representatives and financing sources, if:

the acquisition proposal was not solicited in violation of the provisions described above;
PharmAthene’s Board of Directors determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside financial advisor and its legal counsel, that such PharmAthene takeover proposal constitutes or would reasonably be expected to result in a PharmAthene superior proposal, as is defined in the Merger Agreement and summarized below, and the failure to take such action would be reasonably likely to result in a breach of the fiduciary duties of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors under applicable legal requirements;

120


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PharmAthene gives Theraclone prior written notice of its intention to furnish information to, or enter into discussions with, such person before furnishing any information or entering into discussions with such person;
PharmAthene receives from the person making the PharmAthene takeover proposal an executed confidentiality agreement containing provisions at least as favorable to such party as those contained in the confidentiality agreement between PharmAthene and Theraclone; and
prior to the furnishing of any nonpublic information to the person making the PharmAthene takeover proposal, PharmAthene furnishes the same nonpublic information to Theraclone to the extent not previously furnished.

A PharmAthene superior offer means an unsolicited, bona fide written PharmAthene takeover proposal made by a third party that the PharmAthene Board of Directors reasonably determines, after consultation with PharmAthene’s outside financial advisor and outside legal counsel, and after taking into account any other factors determined by the PharmAthene Board of Directors to be relevant:

is more favorable from a financial point of view to PharmAthene’s stockholders than the merger and the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement;
is reasonably likely to be completed; and
that failing to accept such proposal would be a breach of its fiduciary duties under applicable law.

provided, however, that any such offer shall not be deemed to be a PharmAthene superior proposal if any financing required to consummate the transaction contemplated by such offer is not committed and is not reasonably likely of being obtained by such third party as determined by the PharmAthene Board of Directors in its reasonable judgment, or if the consummation of such transaction is contingent on any such financing being obtained.

The Merger Agreement also provides that PharmAthene will not withdraw its recommendation to proceed with the merger or terminate the Merger Agreement for purposes of entering into an agreement with respect to a PharmAthene superior proposal unless it has first given Theraclone three business days’ advance notice and the opportunity to propose terms that are at least as favorable as those of the superior offer. PharmAthene agreed to promptly advise Theraclone of the status and terms of, and keep Theraclone informed in all material respects with respect to the status and terms of any such PharmAthene takeover proposal or related inquiry and any modification or proposed modification to such PharmAthene takeover proposal or related inquiry.

Stockholder Approval

PharmAthene is obligated under the Merger Agreement to take all action necessary in accordance with the Delaware General Corporation Law and PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws to call, give notice of and hold a special meeting of its stockholders for the purposes of considering the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock in the merger, the amendment to the PharmAthene Certificate of Incorporation increasing the number of authorized shares, the election of the PharmAthene and Theraclone board designees, the amendment to the PharmAthene Bylaws limiting the ability of the Board of Directors to remove PharmAthene’s Chief Executive Officer, as promptly as reasonably practicable after the mailing of this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation.

Theraclone is obligated under the Merger Agreement to obtain written consent of its stockholders sufficient to adopt and approve the Merger Agreement, the merger, and to convert of the shares of Theraclone preferred stock to shares of Theraclone common stock on a one-for-one basis. Theraclone has agreed to take all action necessary in accordance with the Delaware General Corporation Law and the Theraclone Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws to solicit approval by written consent from Theraclone’s stockholders promptly after the effective date of the Form S-4 registration statement of which this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation is a part.

Covenants; Conduct of Business Pending the Merger

PharmAthene and Theraclone each agreed that it will conduct its business in the ordinary course in accordance with past practices and preserve substantially intact its current business organizations, keep

121


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

available the services of its current officers and employees and to preserve its relationships with significant suppliers, licensors, licensees, distributors, lessors and others having significant business dealings with it, and to take other agreed upon actions. Each party also agreed that, subject to certain limited exceptions and except as contemplated by the Merger Agreement, without the consent of the other party, it would not, during the period prior to closing of the merger:

authorize, declare, or pay any dividends on, or make any other distribution in respect of, any shares of capital stock;
split, combine, or reclassify any of its capital stock or other equity securities or issue or authorize or propose the issuance of any other securities in respect of, in lieu of or in substitution for shares of its capital stock or other equity securities;
grant, or commit to grant, any stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted stock units, deferred equity units, awards based on the value of such party’s common stock, or other equity-based awards with respect to such party’s common stock, under any equity incentive plan or otherwise, in each case except for grants to such party’s employees in the ordinary course of business or to a new employee in a manner consistent with past practice;
except as required by applicable law, increase or commit to increase the compensation or other benefits payable or provided to such party’s current or former directors, officers, employees, consultants, or independent contractors, enter into or commit to enter into any employment, change of control, severance, retention, deferred compensation, indemnification, or similar agreement with any director, officer, employee, consultant, or independent contractor of such party, other than (i) in the ordinary course of business with respect to a new employee in a manner consistent with past practice or (ii) for employment agreements terminable on less than thirty days’ notice without penalty or cost, including severance, or except as permitted pursuant to clause (i) or (ii) above or as required pursuant to the terms of any of such party’s existing benefit plans, establish, or commit to establish, any collective bargaining agreement, plan, trust, fund, policy, or arrangement, or benefit plan for the benefit of any current or former directors, officers, employees, consultants, or independent contractors, or any of their beneficiaries;
materially change financial accounting policies or procedures or any of its methods of reporting income, deductions or other material items for financial accounting purposes, except as required by generally accepted accounting principles, SEC rule or policy or applicable law;
adopt any amendments to the such party’s Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws (other than as contemplated by the Merger Agreement);
issue, sell, pledge, dispose of or encumber, or authorize the issuance, sale, pledge, disposition or encumbrance of, any shares of its capital stock or other ownership interest in such party or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for any such shares or ownership interest, or any rights, warrants or options to acquire or with respect to any such shares of capital stock, ownership interest or convertible or exchangeable securities or take any action to cause to be exercisable any otherwise unvested stock option, or cause to be vested any unvested share-based award in such party, under such party’s equity incentive plan (except as otherwise provided by the terms of this Agreement or for nondiscretionary actions pursuant to the express terms of any unvested stock options or unvested share-based awards outstanding on the date of the Merger Agreement), other than (i) issuances of such party’s common shares in respect of any exercise of stock options and settlement of any share-based awards or warrants outstanding on the date of the Merger Agreement (in accordance with their respective terms), or that may be granted after the date of the Merger Agreement, and (ii) the sale of such party’s common shares pursuant to the exercise of stock options to purchase such party’s common shares if necessary to effectuate an optionee direction upon exercise or for withholding of taxes;

122


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

directly or indirectly, purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of its capital stock or any rights, warrants or options to acquire any such shares, other than purchases or deemed acquisitions of its common shares in respect of the exercise price or tax withholding obligations relating to a share-based award upon the net exercise or vesting of any such award in a manner consistent with past practice;
incur, assume, guarantee, prepay, redeem, repurchase or otherwise become liable for, or modify in any material respect the terms of, any indebtedness for borrowed money or become responsible for the indebtedness of any person, other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice and except for (i) indebtedness for borrowed money incurred to replace, renew, extend, refinance or refund any existing indebtedness for borrowed money that (a) is in an amount not exceeding such existing Indebtedness, (b) is on terms no less favorable in the aggregate than such existing indebtedness and (c) that does not contain provisions that will result in the occurrence of a default or event of default upon the consummation of the merger or (ii) guarantees by such party of indebtedness for borrowed money of such party, which indebtedness for borrowed money is incurred in compliance with the Merger Agreement;
sell, lease, license, transfer, exchange or swap, mortgage or otherwise encumber, or subject to any lien (other than permitted liens) or otherwise dispose of any material portion of its properties or assets and except pursuant to existing agreements in effect prior to the execution of the Merger Agreement and listed in the disclosure schedule to the Merger Agreement;
modify, amend, terminate or waive any rights under any of such party’s material contracts or real property leases, in any manner the effect of which is, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to such party;
enter into any contract that would be a material contract of such party or real property lease if it was in effect on the date of the Merger Agreement, other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;
acquire any corporation, partnership or other business organization or division thereof or any assets, other than purchases of inventory and other assets in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;
authorize or make any capital expenditures, other than in accordance with such party’s capital expenditures plan set forth on the disclosure schedule to the Merger Agreement, in connection with the repair or replacement of facilities destroyed or damaged due to casualty or accident, and otherwise in an aggregate amount for all such capital expenditures not to exceed $250,000;
make any loans, advances or capital contributions to, or investments in, any person;
enter into, amend, waive or terminate any transactions, agreements or arrangements with such party’s affiliates in any material respect;
abandon, fail to maintain and renew, or otherwise let lapse, any material intellectual property of such party;
adopt or enter into a plan of complete or partial liquidation, dissolution, restructuring, recapitalization or other reorganization of such party;
waive, settle, satisfy or compromise any actions, suits, arbitrations, mediations or proceedings, other than any such actions, suits, arbitrations, mediations or proceedings not in excess of $250,000 individually or in the aggregate, except for any actions, suits, arbitrations, mediations or proceedings where such party is the plaintiff, in which case, such party may waive, settle, satisfy or compromise, provided that any such waiver, settlement, satisfaction or compromise does not result in an obligation of such party to pay money or have any other obligation to the counterparty as a result thereof, or waive, settle, satisfy or compromise any pending or threatened actions, suits, arbitrations, mediations or proceedings arising out of or related to the Merger Agreement or the transactions contemplated thereby; or

123


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

agree, in writing or otherwise, or announce an intention, to take any of the foregoing actions.

Other Agreements

Each of PharmAthene and Theraclone has agreed to use its commercially reasonable efforts to:

prepare and timely file all tax returns required to be filed by it (or them) on or before the closing date in a manner consistent with past practice, except as otherwise required by a change in applicable law;
consult with the other party with respect to all material closing agreements, issue resolution agreements and other agreements or confirmations to be executed or entered into or received by such party with or from the IRS;
fully and timely pay all material taxes due and payable in respect of such post-signing tax returns that are so filed, or for any such taxes as to which there is a good faith dispute, provide for adequate reserves on the financial statements of such party;
properly reserve for all taxes payable by them for which no post-signing tax return is due prior to the closing date in a manner consistent with past practice;
promptly notify the other party of any material actions, suits, arbitrations, mediations or proceedings or audit pending or threatened against such party in respect of any material tax matter, including tax liabilities and refund claims;
not make (except in the ordinary course of business) or revoke any material election with regard to taxes or file any material amended tax returns, without the prior written consent of the other party;
not make (except in the ordinary course of business) any change in any tax or accounting methods or systems of internal accounting controls (including procedures with respect to the payment of accounts payable and collection of accounts receivable), except as may be appropriate to conform to changes in tax laws or regulatory accounting requirements, without the prior written consent of the other party;
terminate all tax allocation, indemnification or sharing agreements to which such party is a party such that there are no further liabilities thereunder; and
in the case of PharmAthene, maintain its existing listing on NYSE MKT and file or furnish all forms, documents and reports required to be filed or furnished with the SEC, which forms, documents and reports shall comply in all material respects with the requirements of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, as the case may be, and the applicable rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and none of such forms, documents and reports shall contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.

PharmAthene and Theraclone also agreed that:

each of the parties will afford to the other party and their representatives reasonable access to, upon one business days’ prior notice during normal business hours to its officers, properties, contracts, commitments, books and records and any report, schedule or other document filed or received by it pursuant to the requirements of applicable laws, and shall furnish the other party and its representatives with financial, operating and other data and information as the other party may from time to time reasonably request;
each of the parties will use reasonable best efforts to take or cause to be taken such actions as may be required under federal securities laws and any applicable state securities or “blue sky” laws and any stock exchange requirements in connection with the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement;
PharmAthene will include this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation the recommendation of its Board of Directors that its stockholders approve the amendment to its Bylaws described under “— Conditions to Completion of the Merger” above;

124


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Each of PharmAthene and Merger Sub will indemnify all individuals who are present or former directors and officers or who become, prior to the Effective Time, directors, officers, employees and agents of Theraclone, to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL until the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations with respect to any such claims;
Theraclone may obtain at or prior to the Effective Time directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policies in respect of acts or omissions occurring at or prior to the Effective Time and for a period of six years after the Effective Time;
PharmAthene will use its reasonable efforts to cause the shares of PharmAthene common stock to be issued in the merger to be approved for listing on NYSE MKT, subject to official issuance, prior to the Effective Time; and
PharmAthene agreed to take all requisite action to cause, effective as of the Effective Time, the Board of Directors of PharmAthene to consist of directors described under “— Directors and Officers of PharmAthene Following the Merger” above.

Termination

The Merger Agreement may be terminated at any time before the completion of the merger, as set forth below:

by mutual written consent of each of PharmAthene and Theraclone;
by either PharmAthene or Theraclone if the merger has not been completed by January 31, 2014, but this right to terminate the Merger Agreement will not be available to any party whose action or failure to act has been a principal cause of the failure of the merger to be completed on or before such date and such action or failure to act constitutes a breach of the Merger Agreement, and this right to terminate will not be available for an additional 60 days upon request of either party if the SEC has not declared the S-4 registration statement, of which this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation is a part, effective under the Securities Act by October 4, 2013. In addition, this right is not available to PharmAthene before the time at which the PharmAthene stockholder meeting is held at which a quorum necessary to conduct the business of such meeting was present at all times;
by PharmAthene or Theraclone if a governmental entity of competent jurisdiction has issued a final and nonappealable injunction, order, decree or ruling that permanently restrains, enjoins or otherwise prohibits the merger, but this right to terminate will not be available to any party whose material breach of a representation, warranty, covenant, or agreement has been the principal cause of the entry of such final and non-appealable injunction, order, decree or ruling; or
by either PharmAthene or Theraclone if the stockholders of PharmAthene have not approved the issuance of the shares pursuant to the Merger Agreement at the PharmAthene special meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof, but PharmAthene may not terminate the Merger Agreement pursuant to this provision if the failure to obtain the approval of PharmAthene stockholders was caused by the action or failure to act of PharmAthene; or
by Theraclone if:
PharmAthene has breached or failed to perform any of its representations, warranties, covenants or agreements contained in the Merger Agreement or if any representation or warranty of PharmAthene has become untrue as of any date subsequent to the Merger Agreement, in either case such that the conditions to the closing of the merger would not be satisfied as of time of such breach or inaccuracy, but if such breach or inaccuracy is curable, then the Merger Agreement will not terminate pursuant to this provision as a result of a particular breach unless such breach or failure is not cured by the thirtieth calendar day following receipt of written notice of such breach or failure to perform from Theraclone, but this right to terminate will not be available to Theraclone if it is then in breach of a representation, warranty, covenant, or agreement such that the conditions to the closing of the merger would not be satisfied as of the time of such breach or inaccuracy; or

125


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the PharmAthene Board of Directors (or any committee thereof) shall have withdrawn its recommendation that PharmAthene proceed with the merger, or failed to recommend the merger to the PharmAthene stockholders in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation, the PharmAthene Board of Directors shall have recommended or approved any PharmAthene takeover proposal, the PharmAthene Board of Directors shall have failed to publicly reaffirm its recommendation that PharmAthene proceed with the merger within four business days following receipt of a written request by Theraclone to provide such reaffirmation following a PharmAthene takeover proposal or PharmAthene shall have otherwise breached its “no solicitation” obligations in any material respect; or
by PharmAthene if:
Theraclone has breached or failed to perform any of its representations, warranties, covenants or agreements contained in the Merger Agreement or if any representation or warranty of Theraclone has become untrue as of any date subsequent to the Merger Agreement, in either case such that the conditions to the closing of the merger would not be satisfied as of time of such breach or inaccuracy, but if such breach or inaccuracy is curable, then the Merger Agreement will not terminate pursuant to this provision as a result of a particular breach unless such breach or failure is not cured by the thirtieth calendar day following receipt of written notice of such breach or failure to perform from PharmAthene, but this right to terminate will not be available to PharmAthene if it is then in breach of a representation, warranty, covenant, or agreement such that the conditions to the closing of the merger would not be satisfied as of the time of such breach or inaccuracy; or
prior to the receipt of the PharmAthene stockholder approval, if the PharmAthene Board of Directors shall have approved, and PharmAthene shall promptly following such termination enter into, a definitive agreement providing for a PharmAthene superior proposal, or pursuant to its right to terminate if, after the date hereof, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware shall have rendered a substantive decision on the merits in that certain litigation matter between PharmAthene and SIGA and the PharmAthene Board of Directors determines, in its reasonable discretion, that, as a result of such decision, it can no longer consider the merger a merger of equals.

Termination Fee

Fee payable by PharmAthene

PharmAthene must pay Theraclone a break-up fee of $3.5 million if the Merger Agreement is terminated by PharmAthene because it has entered into a definitive agreement providing for a PharmAthene superior proposal, or if either party terminates because the merger has not been completed prior to the outside closing date or the PharmAthene stockholders have failed to consent to the merger, but only if a PharmAthene takeover proposal has been publicly announced, disclosed, made, proposed or communicated and within nine months after the date of the termination of the Merger Agreement, PharmAthene enters into an agreement or understanding with respect to a PharmAthene takeover proposal that is subsequently consummated.

PharmAthene must pay Theraclone a break-up fee of $4.5 million if the Merger Agreement is terminated by either party because the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware shall have rendered a substantive decision on the merits in that certain litigation matter between PharmAthene and SIGA and the PharmAthene Board of Directors determines, in its reasonable discretion, that, as a result of such decision, it can no longer consider the merger a merger of equals.

PharmAthene must pay Theraclone a termination fee equal to the actual and verifiable out-of-pocket costs and expenses of Theraclone in connection with the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, up to $1,000,000 in the aggregate, if the agreement is terminated for any reason other than a breach by Theraclone of the agreement, a governmental entity of competent jurisdiction issuing a final and nonappealable injunction, order, decree or ruling that permanently restrains, enjoins or otherwise prohibits the merger, or the mutual agreement of the parties, and PharmAthene is not otherwise obligated to pay a break-up fee to Theraclone.

126


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Fees payable by Theraclone

The Merger Agreement does not provide for any circumstances under which Theraclone would be required to pay to PharmAthene a termination or breakup fee.

Representations and Warranties

The Merger Agreement contains customary representations and warranties of PharmAthene and Theraclone for a transaction of this type relating to, among other things:

corporate organization and power and similar corporate matters;
ownership of subsidiaries;
authorized and outstanding capital stock, options and warrants;
authority to enter into the Merger Agreement and the related agreements;
approval by the Board of Directors;
any conflicts or violations of each party’s agreements as a result of the merger or the Merger Agreement;
financial statements and, with respect to PharmAthene, documents filed with the SEC and the accuracy of information contained in those documents;
with respect to PharmAthene, disclosure controls and procedures;
any undisclosed liabilities;
compliance with legal requirements;
compliance with environmental laws;
employee benefits and related matters;
material changes or events;
litigation matters;
accuracy of the information provided by such party to be included in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation;
filing of tax returns and payment of taxes;
employee relations matters;
ownership of intellectual property;
ownership of real property and leasehold interests;
votes required for completion of the merger and approval of the proposals that will come before each of the PharmAthene special meeting and the Theraclone written stockholder consent;
absence provision in governing law or documents that would prohibit or restrict the ability of such party to consummate the merger or of the stockholders of such party who are party to such party’s voting agreement to perform their respective obligations thereunder;
the validity of material contracts to which the parties or their subsidiaries are a party and any violation, default or breach to such contracts;
any brokerage or finder’s fee or other fee or commission in connection with the merger;
insurance policies, policy cancellations and claims;
transactions with affiliates; and
regulatory compliance; and

127


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the validity of governmental contracts to which such parties or their subsidiaries are party and any violation, default or breach to such contracts.

The representations and warranties are, in many respects, qualified by materiality and knowledge, and, in the case of PharmAthene, will not survive the merger, but their accuracy forms the basis of one of the conditions to the obligations of PharmAthene and Theraclone to complete the merger.

Amendment

The Merger Agreement may be amended by the parties at any time, except that after the Merger Agreement has been adopted or approved by the stockholders of PharmAthene or stockholders of Theraclone, no amendment which by law requires further approval by the stockholders of PharmAthene or stockholders of Theraclone, as the case may be, shall be made without such further approval.

128


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

VOTING AND OTHER AGREEMENTS

Voting and Lock-up Agreements

In order to induce Theraclone to enter into the Merger Agreement, concurrently and in connection with the execution of the Merger Agreement, certain of PharmAthene’s stockholders, who in the aggregate, beneficially owned approximately 7.5% of the outstanding shares of PharmAthene common stock as of July 31, 2013, entered into the PharmAthene Voting Agreement pursuant to which each stockholder agreed to vote its shares of PharmAthene common stock in furtherance of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and against any amendment of PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws or any other proposal or transaction, the effect of which amendment or other proposal is to delay, impair, prevent or nullify the merger or the transaction contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Each of these stockholders granted Theraclone an irrevocable proxy to vote their respective PharmAthene common stock in accordance with the voting agreement. These stockholders may vote their shares of PharmAthene capital stock on all other matters not referred to in such proxy.

In addition to the PharmAthene Voting Agreement, certain of Theraclone’s stockholders, who in the aggregate held approximately 75% of the outstanding shares of Theraclone capital stock as of July 31, 2013, including MPM Funds, a principal stockholder of PharmAthene, entered into the Theraclone Voting Agreement, pursuant to which each stockholder agreed to vote its shares of Theraclone capital stock (i) in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and any actions required in furtherance thereof, (ii) in favor of the conversion of all outstanding shares of Theraclone preferred stock into shares of Theraclone common stock on a one-for-one basis (as of immediately prior to the Effective Time and contingent upon the merger occurring) pursuant to Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation, (iii) against any other proposal or transaction involving Theraclone, the effect of which amendment or other proposal or transaction would be to delay, impair, prevent or nullify the merger or the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, (iv) against any amendment of Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws that changes in any manner the voting rights of any capital stock of Theraclone (other than the conversion of Theraclone preferred stock into Theraclone common stock), and (v) against any other action or agreement that would result in a breach in any material respect of any covenant, representation or warranty of the Merger Agreement. Each of these stockholders granted PharmAthene an irrevocable proxy to vote their respective Theraclone common stock in accordance with the voting agreement. These stockholders may vote their shares of Theraclone capital stock on all other matters not referred to in such proxy.

Pursuant to both the PharmAthene Voting Agreement and the Theraclone Voting Agreement, subject to certain limited exceptions, the stockholders who are party thereto also have agreed not to sell or transfer shares of the applicable party, or engage in hedging or similar transactions with regard to such shares. To the extent that any such sale or transfer is permitted pursuant to the exceptions included in the stockholders agreement, each person to whom any shares of the applicable party are so sold or transferred must agree in writing to be bound by the terms and provisions of the applicable voting agreement.

Both the PharmAthene Voting Agreement and the Theraclone Voting Agreement will terminate upon, among other things, the earlier of the Effective Time or termination of the Merger Agreement. Copies of the PharmAthene Voting Agreement and Theraclone Voting Agreement are attached as Annex B and Annex C, respectively, to this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation.

Theraclone Post-Closing Lock-up Agreement

Concurrently and in connection with the execution of the Merger Agreement, the directors of Theraclone and their affiliates, as well as certain holders of 5% or more of Theraclone’s capital stock, who, in the aggregate, held approximately 75% of the outstanding shares of Theraclone capital stock as of July 31, 2013, entered into post-closing lock-up agreements with PharmAthene. Pursuant to these agreements, subject to certain limited exceptions, each such stockholder will be subject to lock-up restrictions on the sale of PharmAthene common stock acquired in the merger, pursuant to which 33% of the shares obtained in the merger may be sold six months after the completion of the merger, 66% may be sold nine months after the completion of the merger, and 100% may be sold after the first anniversary of the date of completion of the merger. To the extent that any such sale or transfer is permitted pursuant to the exceptions included in the voting agreement, each person to whom any shares of PharmAthene common stock are so sold or transferred

129


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

must agree in writing to be bound by the terms and provisions of the stockholder agreement. A copy of the form of Post-Closing Lock-up Agreement is attached as Annex E to this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation.

Board Composition Agreement

Upon the completion of the merger, the stockholders of Theraclone and PharmAthene who are party to the voting agreements described above will also enter into the Board Composition Agreement, pursuant to which such stockholders will agree that the nine-member Board of Directors of the combined company will consist of five directors designated by PharmAthene and four directors designated by Theraclone. Those members designated by PharmAthene will initially be Mitchel Sayare, Ph.D., John M. Gill, Brian A. Markison, Eric I. Richman and Derace L. Schaffer, M.D., and those members designated by Theraclone will initially be Steven Gillis, Ph.D., Wende S. Hutton, Clifford J. Stocks and           . Under the Board Composition Agreement, the signing stockholders will agree to vote all shares owned by such holders, or over which such holders have voting control, as necessary to ensure that the PharmAthene and Theraclone designees are elected to the board at each annual or special meeting of stockholders of PharmAthene at which directors are elected or through any action taken by written consent of the stockholders of PharmAthene by which directors are elected. The stockholders party thereto will also agree to cause the resignation of one of PharmAthene’s designees upon the earlier of (i) the full settlement or final, non-appealable resolution of PharmAthene’s civil action against SIGA and (ii) the second anniversary of the completion of the merger, but not prior to the first anniversary of the completion of the merger.

The Board Composition Agreement will terminate on the earliest to occur of the fifth anniversary of the date of the agreement and the date of any final resolution of PharmAthene’s civil action against SIGA, but not prior to the first anniversary of completion of the merger. The stockholders party thereto may sell their shares free of the rights and obligations under the Board Composition Agreement. A copy of the form of Board Composition Agreement is attached as Annex D to this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation.

130


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MANAGEMENT OF THE COMBINED COMPANY

The nine-member Board of Directors of the combined company will initially consist of five directors designated by PharmAthene, Mitch Sayare, Ph.D., John M. Gill, Brian A. Markison, Eric I. Richman and Derace L. Schaffer, M.D., and four directors designated by Theraclone, Steven Gillis, Ph.D., Wende S. Hutton, Clifford J. Stocks and         .

Following the merger, the combined company’s executive officers will be Clifford J. Stocks (Chief Executive Officer), Francesca M. Cook (Senior Vice President, Policy and Government Affairs), Russ Hawkinson (Chief Financial Officer), Jordan P. Karp (Senior Vice President and General Counsel), Eleanor Ramos, M.D. (Chief Medical Officer) and Kristine Swiderek, Ph.D. (Chief Scientific Officer). Each of these executive officers of the combined company currently holds the same position at his or her respective company.

The following table lists the names and ages as of September 3, 2013 and positions of the individuals who are expected to serve as executive officers, directors or key employees of the combined company upon completion of the merger:

   
Name   Age   Position
Clifford J. Stocks   55   Chief Executive Officer and Director
Francesca M. Cook   48   Senior Vice President, Policy and Government Affairs
Russ Hawkinson   54   Chief Financial Officer
Jordan P. Karp   47   Senior Vice President and General Counsel
Eleanor Ramos, M.D.   57   Chief Medical Officer
Kristine Swiderek, Ph.D.   51   Chief Scientific Officer
Mitchel B. Sayare, Ph.D.   65   Director
John M. Gill   61   Director
Steven Gillis, Ph.D.   60   Director
Wende S. Hutton   53   Director
Brian A. Markison   53   Director
Eric I. Richman   52   Director
Derace L. Schaffer, M.D.   65   Director
Wayne Morges, Ph.D.*   66   Senior Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Quality (Key Employee)

* Mr. Morges will not be an executive officer or director of the combined company.

Executive Officers

Clifford J. Stocks.  Mr. Stocks has served as Theraclone’s Chief Executive Officer and as a member of the Theraclone board of directors since December 2011. Prior to joining Theraclone, Mr. Stocks served as the Chief Business Officer of Calistoga Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a private biotechnology company specializing in medicines targeting the PI3 kinase pathway, from March 2009 to April 2011. At Calistoga he led the partnering and M&A processes, activities and teamwork that resulted in the acquisition of Calistoga by Gilead. From January 2007 to March 2009, Mr. Stocks served as the Co-founder and Managing Director of MarketGain Partners, a consulting firm focused on biotechnology and information technology clients. Mr. Stocks’ career includes fifteen years at ICOS Corporation where he served as an Executive Officer and Vice President of Business Development. While at ICOS, he led acquisitions and joint venture activities as well as alliance formation, strategy and licensing. He played an instrumental role on the leadership team that developed and launched Cialis, and was a key architect of the Lilly ICOS joint venture partnership that led to their merger in 2007. Prior to ICOS he was a management consultant in the Health Services practice of Booz Allen Hamilton. Mr. Stocks holds a B.S. in biology from the University of Utah and an MBA from the University of Chicago, Booth Graduate School of Business. Mr. Stocks brings to the combined company’s Board of Directors extensive experience in biotechnology and provides strategic corporate and operational guidance to the combined company’s Board of Directors.

131


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Francesca M. Cook.  Ms. Cook has been PharmAthene’s Senior Vice President, Policy and Government Affairs since March 2010, and in February 2012 took over responsibility for program management. Prior to that, she served as Vice President, Policy and Government Affairs since PharmAthene’s merger on August 3, 2007 and from October 2003 through August 3, 2007 held the same position with Former PharmAthene. Prior to that, Ms. Cook served as Vice President, Policy & Reimbursement Services for Guilford Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from March 2001 through October 2003 and Vice President at Covance Health Economics and Outcomes Services, a health care consulting firm, from 1996 through 2001. Additionally, Ms. Cook worked in the U.S. Senate and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services from 1988 through 1993. Ms. Cook received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Biology from Mount Holyoke College and a Master of Public Health degree from Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Public Health.

Russ Hawkinson.  Mr. Hawkinson has served as Theraclone’s Chief Financial Officer since April 2007. Prior to joining Theraclone, Mr. Hawkinson served as the Vice President, Finance and Accounting of Cell Therapeutics, Inc. from September 2005 to April 2007 and the Vice President, Finance of Corixa Corporation from November 1999 to July 2005. Prior to Corixa Corporation, Mr. Hawkinson served as an Audit Senior Manager at Ernst & Young LLP. Mr. Hawkinson holds a B.A. in accounting from the University of Washington.

Jordan P. Karp, Esq.  Mr. Karp has been PharmAthene’s Senior Vice President and General Counsel since June 2008 and in January 2012 assumed responsibility for corporate development function. In September 2008, he was appointed corporate secretary. Prior to joining PharmAthene, Mr. Karp was employed by Constellation Energy Group, Inc., a diversified energy company, from October 2001 to November 2007. Mr. Karp served as Vice President & General Counsel for one of Constellation Energy’s operating divisions, Constellation NewEnergy, Inc., a retail marketer of electricity and natural gas, from October 2002 until November 2007. From November 2007 until Mr. Karp joined the PharmAthene, he worked as an attorney in private practice. Prior to joining Constellation Energy, Mr. Karp held in-house legal positions of increasing responsibility at MCI Communications Corp. (telecommunications), Guilford Pharmaceuticals Inc. (biopharmaceuticals), and Mentor Technologies Group, Inc. (training and consulting), where Mr. Karp served as Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary from November 1999 through June 2001. Mr. Karp holds a B.A. in Natural Sciences from The Johns Hopkins University and a J.D. from Yale Law School.

Eleanor Ramos, M.D.  Dr. Ramos has served as Theraclone’s Chief Medical Officer since July 2011. Prior to joining Theraclone, Dr. Ramos served as the Senior Vice President, Chief Medical Offer of ZymoGenetics, Inc. from 2009 to 2011 and as its Vice President, Clinical Development from 2007 to 2009. She also previously held senior positions at Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, the Immune Tolerance Network at the University of California, San Francisco and Roche Global Development. Dr. Ramos holds a B.S. summa cum laude in chemistry from Tufts University and an M.D. with Alpha Omega Alpha distinction from Tufts Medical School.

Kristine Swiderek, Ph.D.  Dr. Swiderek has served as Theraclone’s Chief Scientific Officer since December 2011, previously serving as its Vice President, Research from January 2011 to December 2011. Prior to joining Theraclone, Dr. Swiderek served at Zymogenetics, Inc., a public biotechnology company specializing in development of protein therapeutics, from 1997 to 2010, including as the Vice President of Protein Science from 2008 to 2010. Prior to ZymoGenetics, Inc., Dr. Swiderek established an analytical core facility at the City of Hope, National Cancer Center. Dr. Swiderek holds a Diploma Thesis in protein biochemistry and a Ph.D. in protein biochemistry and analytical science from the Ruhr-Universität in Bochum, Germany.

Non-Employee Directors

Mitchel B. Sayare, Ph.D.  Dr. Sayare has been a member of the PharmAthene Board of Directors since April 2010 and was appointed Chairman of the Board in July 2011. Until 2010, Dr. Sayare served as the Chairman of the Board of public company ImmunoGen, Inc. (a position he had held since 1989). In addition, he served as ImmunoGen’s Chief Executive Officer from 1986 to December 31, 2008, and as its President from 1986 to 1992, and from 1994 to July 2008. Prior to joining ImmunoGen, he served as Vice President of Development of Xenogen from 1982 to 1985. Prior to that he was Assistant Professor of Biophysics and Biochemistry at the University of Connecticut. Dr. Sayare holds a Ph.D. in Biochemistry from Temple

132


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

University School of Medicine. Dr. Sayare is a director of Cymogen Dx, Inc. and Isabella Products, Inc., both privately-held companies. Dr. Sayare was chosen to serve as a director of the combined company’s Board of Directors primarily because of his substantial experience as a board member and executive officer of biotechnology companies.

John M. Gill.  Mr. Gill has served as a member of the PharmAthene Board of Directors since August 3, 2007 and from February 2004 to August 3, 2007 served as a member of the Board of Directors and as Chairman of the Audit Committee of PharmAthene’s predecessor, privately-held PharmAthene. Mr. Gill is currently the President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of TetraLogic Pharmaceuticals Corporation, a private biopharmaceutical company, and has served in these positions since 2003. He is also an advisor or director of other private companies, the Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, and other non-profit community organizations. Mr. Gill has previously held positions at 3-Dimensional Pharmaceuticals and SmithKline Beecham. Mr. Gill received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Rutgers University. Mr. Gill brings to the combined company’s board substantial executive and board experience in the pharmaceutical industry and significant financial knowledge and expertise.

Steven Gillis, Ph.D.  Dr. Gillis has served as the chairman of Theraclone’s board of directors since February 2006 and served as Theraclone’s acting Chief Executive Officer from June 2010 to December 2011. Since 2005, Dr. Gillis has been a managing director at ARCH Venture Partners, a venture capital firm. From 1994 to 2005, Dr. Gillis served as the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the board of directors of Corixa Corporation, which he co-founded in October 1994. Dr. Gillis currently serves as a member of the boards of directors of bluebird bio, Inc, as well as numerous privately-held companies and previously served as a member of the board of directors of Trubion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from 2006 until it was acquired in 2010. Dr. Gillis holds a B.A. in biology and English from Williams College and a Ph.D. in biological science from Dartmouth College. Dr. Gillis brings to the combined company’s board of directors extensive experience in the venture capital industry, particularly with biotech and pharmaceutical companies, and in biologistic therapies.

Wende S. Hutton.  Ms. Hutton has served as a member of Theraclone’s directors since March 2007. Since May 2007, she has served as a General Partner of Canaan Partners, a global venture capital firm. From July 2004 until May 2007, she served in various capacities at Canaan Partners including Venture Partner and then Partner. Ms. Hutton currently serves as a member of the boards of directors of Chimerix, Inc., as well as several privately-held companies. Ms. Hutton holds an A.B. in human biology from Stanford University and an MBA from Harvard Business School, where she was a Baker Scholar. Ms. Hutton brings to the combined company’s board of directors expertise in marketing and finance from across the life sciences spectrum, as well as experience facilitating the development and market entrance of several new drugs and medical devices.

Brian A. Markison.  Mr. Markison has been a member of the PharmAthene Board of Directors since September 2011. He is a healthcare industry advisor to private equity firm, Austin Capital Partners, Inc. He was President and Chief Executive Officer, and member of the Board, of Fougera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from 2011 to 2012. Mr. Markison has more than 30 years of experience in the pharmaceutical industry. He formerly served as Chairman (from May 2007 through February 2011) and President and Chief Executive Officer (from July 2004 through February 2011) of King Pharmaceuticals, which he joined as Chief Operating Officer before being promoted to President and Chief Executive Officer and elected Chairman. Prior to King Pharmaceuticals, Mr. Markison held various senior leadership positions at Bristol-Myers Squibb, including President of Oncology/Virology and Oncology Therapeutics Network; President, Neuroscience/Infectious Disease and Dermatology; and Senior Vice President, Operational Excellence and Productivity. Mr. Markison serves on the Board of Directors of public companies Alere, Inc., Immunomedics, Inc., and Rosetta Genomics, Ltd., where he also serves as Board Chairman. He also serves on the Board of Directors for the Komen Foundation for South/Central New Jersey and on the Board of Trustees for the Pennington School. Mr. Markison received a B.S. degree from Iona College. Mr. Markison was chosen as a director because of the experience and broad industry knowledge he gained as a director of, and in a variety of leadership positions in, public healthcare companies.

133


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Eric I. Richman.  Mr. Richman was appointed PharmAthene’s President and Chief Operating Officer on March 25, 2010, interim Chief Executive Officer on May 2, 2010 and Chief Executive Officer on October 20, 2010. He became a Director of PharmAthene on May 17, 2010. Prior to his March 25, 2010 appointment, Mr. Richman was PharmAthene’s Senior Vice President, Business Development and Strategic Planning since PharmAthene’s merger on August 3, 2007, and from August 2003 through August 3, 2007 held the same position with Former PharmAthene. Prior to joining PharmAthene, Mr. Richman held various commercial and strategic positions of increasing responsibility over a 12 year period at MedImmune, Inc. from its inception and was Director, International Commercialization at that company. Mr. Richman previously served as Director of Lev Pharmaceuticals (until its acquisition by ViroPharma Incorporated in 2008) and American Bank and currently serves as Director of ADMA Biologics, Inc. Mr. Richman received a Bachelor of Science in Biomedical Science from the Sophie Davis School of Biomedical Education and a Master of Business Administration from the American Graduate School of International Management. As PharmAthene’s current Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Richman brings to the combined company’s board critical insights into PharmAthene’s day-to-day operations.

Derace L. Schaffer, M.D.  Dr. Schaffer previously served as Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PharmAthene from April 2005 to August 3, 2007. Dr. Schaffer is the founder and Chief Executive Officer of The Lan Group, a venture capital firm specializing in healthcare and high technology investments. He has served as Chairman of several healthcare companies, including Radiologix, Inc. when it was private, and he has been an active investor for approximately twenty years on a variety of healthcare companies. Dr. Schaffer is the founder of Radiologix. Dr. Schaffer served as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Ide Imaging Group, P.C. from 1980 to 2001. Dr. Schaffer has served as a director on many healthcare boards of directors, including several health systems and more than ten healthcare services and technology companies. Dr. Schaffer received his postgraduate radiology training at Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, where he served as Chief Resident. He also serves as a director of American CareSource Holdings, Inc., Archermobile, Inc. and Radiologix and has previously served as director of King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and of Allion Healthcare, Inc. (each a public company). Dr. Schaffer is a member of Alpha Omega Alpha, the national medical honor society. Dr, Schaffer was chosen as a director due to his substantial experience as an executive, board member and investor in the healthcare and technologies and his practical experience in the medical field.

Key Employee

Wayne Morges, Ph.D.  Dr. Morges has been PharmAthene’s Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Quality since the merger on August 3, 2007, and from January 2005 through August 3, 2007 held the same position with PharmAthene’s predecessor. Prior to that, Dr. Morges was the Vice President of Global Regulatory Affairs, Vaccines for Baxter Healthcare Corporation from June 2000 to November 2004. Previously, Dr. Morges worked at Merck & Co, Inc., or Merck, holding various positions of increasing responsibility in Merck’s vaccine division, including heading Quality & Regulatory Affairs for licensed biologicals. Dr. Morges holds a Ph.D. in Microbiology and Immunology from Hahnemann University and Bachelor of Science and Master of Science degrees from Penn State University.

134


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS OF PHARMATHENE

The following table sets forth information, as it was available to PharmAthene on September 3, 2013, based on information furnished by the persons named below, obtained from PharmAthene’s transfer agent or obtained from certain beneficial ownership filings made by the persons named below with the SEC, with respect to the beneficial ownership of shares of PharmAthene’s common stock by (i) each person known by PharmAthene to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of its outstanding shares of common stock (inclusion in this table shall not be deemed an admission of affiliate status), (ii) each director and Named Executive Officer of PharmAthene and (iii) all directors and executive officers of PharmAthene as a group. Except as indicated in the footnotes to the table, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them.

   
Name of Beneficial Owner(1)   Number of Shares Beneficially Owned   Percentage
of
Outstanding Shares(2)
Funds Affiliated with MPM Bioventures III, L.P.(3)     7,168,930       13.49 % 
Steven St. Peter, M.D.(4)**     20,000       *  
John M. Gill(5)**     152,759       *  
Joel McCleary(6)**     288,559       *  
Derace L. Schaffer, M.D.(7)**     1,261,043       2.40 % 
Eric I. Richman(8)**     1,098,183       2.06 % 
Jeffrey W. Runge, M.D.(9)**     117,700       *  
Mitchel Sayare, Ph.D.(10)**     184,104       *  
Brian A. Markison**(11)     40,000       *  
Linda L. Chang(12)     87,500       *  
Jordan P. Karp, Esq.(13)     392,371       *  
Francesca Cook(14)     370,843       *  
Thomas R. Fuerst, Ph.D.(15)     44,545       *  
All directors and executive officers as a group (11 persons)     4,013,062       7.32 % 

* Less than 1.0%
** Director
(1) Unless otherwise indicated in other footnotes, the address for each beneficial owner is c/o PharmAthene, Inc., One Park Place, Annapolis, MD 21401.
(2) Based on 52,310,913 shares of PharmAthene common stock as of September 3, 2013. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, shares of common stock underlying warrants, notes or subject to options held by that person that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days are deemed outstanding. Such shares, however, are not deemed outstanding for the purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Except as indicated in the following footnotes or pursuant to applicable community property laws, each stockholder named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares set forth opposite such stockholder’s name.
(3) Includes 729,108 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants. As disclosed in their Schedule 13D/A filed on December 27, 2010, the amounts included in the table are directly owned by MPM BioVentures III, L.P. or BV III, MPM BioVentures III-QP, L.P., or BV III QP, MPM BioVentures III GmbH & Co. Beteiligungs KG, or BV III KG, MPM BioVentures III Parallel Fund, L.P., or BV III PF, and MPM Asset Management Investors 2004 BVIII LLC, or AM LLC. MPM BioVentures III GP, L.P., or BV III GP, and MPM BioVentures III LLC, or BV III LLC, are the direct and indirect general partners of BV III, BV III QP, BV III KG and BV III PF, collectively with AM LLC, BV III GP and BV III LLC, the MPM Funds. The members of BV III LLC and AM LLC are Luke Evnin, Ansbert Gadicke, Nicholas Galakatos, Dennis Henner, Nicholas Simon III, Michael Steinmetz and Kurt Wheeler, who disclaim beneficial ownership of these shares except to the extent of their proportionate pecuniary interest therein. Dr. Steven St. Peter, a member of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors, was affiliated with the MPM Funds through April 2012, but was not a member of the general partners and thus is not deemed to have beneficial

135


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ownership of the shares owned by the MPM Funds. The amount for the MPM Funds in the table above includes options to purchase 91,104 shares granted to Dr. St. Peter and subsequently assigned to MPM Funds and options to purchase 1,104 shares held directly by Ansbert Gadicke. The address for the MPM Funds is The John Hancock Tower, 200 Clarendon Street, 54th floor, Boston, MA, 02116.
(4) Does not include options to purchase 20,000 shares of PharmAthene common stock that are not exercisable and will not be exercisable within 60 days of the date of this table. Furthermore, does not include options to purchase 91,104 shares of common stock that have been assigned to the MPM Funds. Dr. St. Peter is a member of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors. Dr. St. Peter was affiliated with the MPM Funds through April 2012 as discussed in footnote (3) above, but was not a member of the general partners and thus is not deemed to have beneficial ownership of the shares owned by the MPM Funds.
(5) Consists of options to purchase 152,759 shares of PharmAthene common stock (representing the portion of options to purchase a total of 172,759 shares of common stock that was exercisable as of the date of this table or will become exercisable within 60 days thereof). Mr. Gill is a member of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors.
(6) Includes options to purchase 162,759 shares of PharmAthene common stock (representing the portion of options to purchase a total of 182,759 shares of common stock that was exercisable as of the date of this table or will become exercisable within 60 days thereof) and 5,633 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants. Mr. McCleary is a member of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors.
(7) Includes options to purchase 110,000 shares of common stock (representing the portion of options to purchase a total of 130,000 shares of common stock that was exercisable as of the date of this table or will become exercisable within 60 days thereof) and 133,333 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants. Dr. Schaffer is a member of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors. Of the shares beneficially owned by Dr. Schaffer, 123,929 shares, and 80,000 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants, are held in Dr. Schaffer’s IRA.
(8) Includes 159,516 restricted shares granted and not relinquished for tax purposes (included herein irrespective of vesting date), options to purchase a total of 909,167 shares of common stock (representing the portion of options to purchase a total of 1,434,167 shares of common stock that was exercisable as of the date of this table or will become exercisable within 60 days thereof) and 2,194 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants. On March 25, 2010, Mr. Richman was appointed PharmAthene’s President, on May 2, 2010 PharmAthene’s interim Chief Executive Officer and on October 20, 2010 PharmAthene’s Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Richman was appointed to PharmAthene’s Board of Directors in May 2010.
(9) Includes options to purchase a total of 80,000 shares of common stock (representing the portion of options to purchase a total of 100,000 shares of common stock that was exercisable as of the date of this table or will become exercisable within 60 days thereof). Dr. Runge is a member of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors.
(10) Includes options to purchase a total of 179,104 shares of common stock (representing the portion of options to purchase a total of 212,139 shares of common stock that was exercisable as of the date of this table or will become exercisable within 60 days thereof). Dr. Sayare is a member of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors and became its Chairman in July 2011.
(11) Includes options to purchase a total of 40,000 shares of common stock (representing the portion of options to purchase a total of 60,000 shares of common stock that was exercisable as of the date of this table or will become exercisable within 60 days thereof). Mr. Markison became a member of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors in September 2011.
(12) Includes 20,000 restricted shares granted and not relinquished for tax purposes (included herein irrespective of vesting date), options to purchase a total of 57,500 shares of common stock (representing the portion of options to purchase a total of 245,000 shares of common stock that was exercisable as of the date of this table or will become exercisable within 60 days thereof). Linda L. Chang is PharmAthene’s Chief Financial Officer.
(13) Includes 21,929 restricted shares granted and not relinquished for tax purposes (included herein irrespective of vesting date), options to purchase 360,442 shares of common stock (representing the portion of options to purchase a total of 531,692 shares of common stock that was exercisable as of the date of this table or will become exercisable within 60 days thereof). Mr. Karp is PharmAthene’s General Counsel.
(14) Includes 33,604 restricted shares granted and not relinquished for tax purposes (included herein irrespective of vesting date), options to purchase 331,717 shares of common stock (representing the portion of options to purchase a total of 509,217 shares of common stock that was exercisable as of the

136


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

date of this table or will become exercisable within 60 days thereof). Ms. Cook is PharmAthene’s Senior Vice President, Policy and Government Affairs.
(15) Includes 44,545 shares of common stock based on information from the Company’s proxy statement filed in connection with its 2012 annual meeting and Dr. Fuerst’s exercise of stock options in March 2013. Dr. Fuerst resigned on October 19, 2012 as PharmAthene’s Chief Scientific Officer.

137


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS OF THERACLONE

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of Theraclone’s capital stock as of September 3, 2013, by (i) each person known to Theraclone to be a beneficial owner of more than 5% of its capital stock, (ii) each Theraclone director, (iii) each Theraclone executive officer and (iv) all directors and executive officers as a group.

Unless indicated otherwise below, the address of each officer or director listed below is c/o Theraclone Sciences, Inc., 1124 Columbia Street, Suite 300, Seattle, Washington 98104. Except as otherwise indicated below, Theraclone believes that the beneficial owners of the common stock listed below have sole investment and voting power with respect to the shares.

   
Beneficial Owner   Number of Shares Beneficially Owned(1)   Percentage of Shares Beneficially Owned(2)
5% Stockholders
                 
Entities affiliated with ARCH Venture Partners(3)     11,785,214       28.8 % 
Canaan VII L.P.(4)     9,925,897       24.3 % 
Healthcare Ventures VIII, L.P.(5)     6,192,071       15.2 % 
Entities affiliated with MPM Capital(6)     5,636,887       14.1 % 
Named Executive Officers and Directors
                 
Clifford J. Stocks(7)     890,046       2.1 % 
Russ Hawkinson(7)     472,264       1.2 % 
Eleanor Ramos(7)     250,146       *  
Kristine Swiderek(7)     239,792       *  
Steven Gillis, Ph.D.(8)     13,053,304       31.0 % 
Wende S. Hutton(9)     9,989,942       24.4 % 
Christopher Mirabelli, Ph.D.(5)     6,192,071       15.3 % 
Wendye Robbins, M.D.(7)     33,018       *  
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (8 individuals)(10)     31,120,583       67.3 % 

* Less than 1% of the outstanding shares.
(1) Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of capital stock owned as of September 3, 2013 and shares of capital stock that are issuable within 60 days of September 3, 2013, including pursuant to options or warrants to purchase capital stock, are deemed beneficially owned for computing the percentage of the holder holding such securities, but are not considered outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage of any other holder.
(2) Based on 39,708,753 shares of common stock, assuming the conversion of all outstanding shares of preferred stock into 37,373,601 shares of common stock, outstanding as of September 3, 2013.
(3) Represents 70,085 shares of capital stock and warrants to purchase 8,602 shares of capital stock that are exercisable within 60 days of September 3, 2013 held by ARCH V Entrepreneurs Fund, L.P. and 10,429,872 shares of capital stock and warrants to purchase 1,276,655 shares of capital stock that are exercisable within 60 days of September 3, 2013 held by ARCH Venture Fund V, L.P. ARCH Venture Partners V, LLC is the sole general partner of ARCH Venture Partners V, L.P., which is the sole general partner of ARCH Venture Fund V, L.P. and ARCH V Entrepreneurs Fund, L.P. The managing directors of ARCH Venture Partners V, LLC are Keith Crandell, Clinton Bybee and Robert Nelsen. ARCH Venture Fund V, L.P. and ARCH V Entrepreneurs Fund, L.P. are affiliated funds of ARCH Venture Partners. Steven Gillis, Ph. D., is a managing director of ARCH Venture Partners and owns an interest in ARCH Venture Fund V, L.P. and ARCH V Entrepreneurs Fund, L.P. Dr. Gillis does not have voting or disposition power over the shares held by ARCH Venture Fund V, L.P. and ARCH V Entrepreneurs Fund, L.P. The address for the ARCH entities is 8725 W. Higgins Road, Suite 290, Chicago, Illinois 60631.
(4) Represents 8,698,945 shares of capital stock and warrants to purchase 1,226,952 shares of capital stock that are exercisable within 60 days of September 3, 2013 by Canaan VII L.P., Canaan Partners VII LLC

138


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

is the general partner of Canaan VII L.P. The managers of Canaan Partners VII LLC are Brenton K. Ahrens, John V. Balen, Stephen Bloch, Wende S. Hutton, who is a member of Theraclone’s Board of Directors, Maha Ibrahim, Deepak Kamra, Gregory Kopchinsky, Seth A. Rudnick, Guy M. Russo and Eric A. Young. The address for Canaan VII L.P. is 2765 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, California 94025.
(5) Represents 5,241,580 shares of capital stock and warrants to purchase 950,491 shares of capital stock that are exercisable within 60 days of September 3, 2013 held by HealthCare Ventures VIII, L.P., HealthCare Partners VIII LLC is the general partner of HealthCare Partners VIII, L.P., which is the general partner of HealthCare Ventures VIII, L.P. The managing members of HealthCare Partners VIII, LLC are James Cavanaugh, Augustine Lawlor, John Littlechild, Christopher Mirabelli who is a member of Theraclone’s board of directors, and Harold Werner. The address for HealthCare Ventures VIII, L.P. is 47 Thorndike Street, Suite B1-1, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02141.
(6) Represents 84,399 shares of capital stock and warrants to purchase 6,447 shares of capital stock that are exercisable within 60 days of September 3, 2013 held by MPM Asset Management Investors 2003 BVIII LLC; 293,109 shares of capital stock and warrants to purchase 22,388 shares of capital stock that are exercisable within 60 days of September 3, 2013 held by MPM BioVentures III, L.P.; 368,413 shares of capital stock and warrants to purchase 28,140 shares of capital stock that are exercisable within 60 days of September 3, 2013 held by MPM BioVentures III GmbH & Co. Beteiligungs KG; 131,653 shares of capital stock and warrants to purchase 10,056 shares of capital stock that are exercisable within 60 days of September 3, 2013 held by MPM BioVentures III Parallel Fund, L.P.; and 4,359,313 shares of capital stock and warrants to purchase 332,969 shares of capital stock that are exercisable within 60 days of September 3, 2013 held by MPM BioVentures III-QP, L.P., MPM BioVentures III GP, L.P. is the general partner of MPM BioVentures III LLC, which is the general partner of MPM BioVentures III, L.P., MPM BioVentures III GmbH & Co. Beteiligungs KG, MPM BioVentures III Parallel Fund, L.P. and MPM BioVentures III-QP, L.P. Ansbert Gadicke, Luke Evnin, Nicholas Galakatos, Dennis Henner, Nicholas Simon, Michael Steinmetz and Kurt Wheeler share voting and dispositive power over the shares held by such entities. The address for the MPM entities is 200 Clarendon Street, 54th Floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02116.
(7) Represents shares of common stock issuable pursuant to options that are exercisable within 60 days of September 3, 2013.
(8) Represents (i) 58,090 shares of capital stock and 1,210,000 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to options that are exercisable within 60 days of September 3, 2013 held by Dr. Gillis and (ii) 70,085 shares of capital stock and warrants to purchase 8,602 shares of capital stock that are exercisable within 60 days of September 3, 2013 held by ARCH V Entrepreneurs Fund, L.P. and 10,429,872 shares of capital stock and warrants to purchase 1,276,655 shares of capital stock that are exercisable within 60 days of September 3, 2013 held by ARCH Venture Fund V, L.P. ARCH Venture Partners V, LLC is the sole general partner of ARCH Venture Partners V, L.P., which is the sole general partner of ARCH Venture Fund V, L.P. and ARCH V Entrepreneurs Fund, L.P. The managing directors of ARCH Venture Partners V, LLC are Keith Crandell, Clinton Bybee and Robert Nelsen. ARCH Venture Fund V, L.P. and ARCH V Entrepreneurs Fund, L.P. are affiliated funds of ARCH Venture Partners. Steven Gillis, Ph. D., is a managing director of ARCH Venture Partners and owns an interest in ARCH Venture Fund V, L.P. and ARCH V Entrepreneurs Fund, L.P. Dr. Gillis does not have voting or disposition power over the shares held by ARCH Venture Fund V, L.P. and ARCH V Entrepreneurs Fund, L.P.
(9) Represents (i) 54,054 shares of capital stock held by Hutton Living Trust Dated 12/10/96, of which Wende S. Hutton is a trustee and shares voting and dispositive power over, and (ii) 8,698,945 shares of capital stock and warrants to purchase 1,226,952 shares of capital stock that are exercisable within 60 days of September 3, 2013 by Canaan VII L.P. Canaan Partners VII LLC is the general partner of Canaan VII L.P. Wende S. Hutton, who is a member of Theraclone’s Board of Directors, is a manager of Canaan Partners VII LLC.
(10) Includes the following securities, which are exercisable or convertible into shares of Theraclone’s securities within 60 days of September 3, 2013: (a) 3,095,266 shares issuable pursuant to exercisable options and (b) 3,472,700 shares issuable pursuant to exercisable warrants.

139


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS OF THE COMBINED COMPANY

The following table sets forth information, as it was available to PharmAthene and Theraclone on September 3, 2013, with respect to the post-merger beneficial ownership of shares of common stock of the combined company, assuming the merger had been completed on September 3, 2013, by (i) each person known by PharmAthene and Theraclone to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the shares of common stock of the combined company, (ii) each director and executive officer of the combined company, and (iii) all directors and executive officers of the combined company as a group. Except as indicated in the footnotes to the table, the persons listed below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them.

   
Name of Beneficial Owner(1)   Number of
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
  Percentage of
Outstanding
Shares(2)
5% Stockholders
                 
Entities affiliated with MPM Capital(3)     13,461,856       13.7 % 
Entities affiliated with Arch Venture Partners(4)     13,156,816       13.4 % 
Canaan VII L.P.(5)     11,081,106       11.3 % 
Healthcare Ventures VIII, L.P.(6)     6,912,725       7.1 % 
Executive Officers and Directors
                 
Clifford J. Stocks(7)**     993,632       1.0 % 
Russ Hawkinson(7)     527,228       *  
Francesca Cook(8)     370,843       *  
Jordan P. Karp Esq.(9)     392,371       *  
Eleanor Ramos(7)     279,259       *  
Kristine Swiderek(7)     267,700       *  
Mitchel B. Sayare, Ph.D.(10)**     184,104       *  
Steven Gillis, Ph.D.(11)**     14,572,490       14.7 % 
John M. Gill(12)**     152,759       *  
Wende S. Hutton(13)**     11,152,604       11.4 % 
Brian M. Markison(14)**     40,000       *  
Eric I. Richman(15)**     1,098,183       1.1 % 
Derace L. Schaffer, M.D.(16)**     1,261,043       1.3 % 
All directors and executive officers as a group (13 persons)(17)     31,292,216       29.8 % 

* Less than 1.0%
** Director
(1) The address for each beneficial owner is as set forth for such person in the section entitled “Principal Stockholders of PharmAthene” and “Principal Stockholders of Theraclone.”
(2) Based on 96,641,101 shares of common stock of the combined company that would be outstanding as of September 3, 2013 assuming, at an exchange ratio of 1.116 PharmAthene shares for one Theraclone share, assuming the merger had been completed as of such date. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, shares of common stock underlying warrants, or subject to options held by that person that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days are deemed outstanding. Such shares, however, are not deemed outstanding for the purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Except as indicated in the following footnotes or pursuant to applicable community property laws, each stockholder named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares set forth opposite such stockholder’s name.
(3) See footnote (3) to the table in the section entitled “Principal Stockholders of PharmAthene” and footnote (6) to the table in the section entitled ”Principal Stockholders of Theraclone”.
(4) See footnote (3) to the table in the section entitled “Principal Stockholders of Theraclone”.
(5) See footnote (4) to the table in the section entitled “Principal Stockholders of Theraclone”.

140


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(6) See footnote (5) to the table in the section entitled “Principal Stockholders of Theraclone”.
(7) See footnote (7) to the table in the section entitled “Principal Stockholders of Theraclone”.
(8) See footnote (14) to the table in the section entitled “Principal Stockholders of PharmAthene”.
(9) See footnote (13) to the table in the section entitled “Principal Stockholders of PharmAthene”.
(10) See footnote (10) to the table in the section entitled “Principal Stockholders of PharmAthene”.
(11) See footnote (8) to the table in the section entitled “Principal Stockholders of Theraclone”.
(12) See footnote (5) to the table in the section entitled “Principal Stockholders of PharmAthene”.
(13) See footnote (9) to the table in the section entitled “Principal Stockholders of Theraclone”.
(14) See footnote (11) to the table in the section entitled “Principal Stockholders of PharmAthene”.
(15) See footnote (8) to the table in the section entitled “Principal Stockholders of PharmAthene”.
(16) See footnote (7) to the table in the section entitled “Principal Stockholders of PharmAthene”.
(17) See footnote (10) to the table in the section entitled “Principal Stockholders of Theraclone”.

141


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

PharmAthene Transactions

Other than as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K in the sections “Management of the Combined Company” or as disclosed in the sections “Merger Agreement” or “Voting and Other Agreements,” or in this section, no reportable transactions as described in Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K took place since January 1, 2010 with respect to the PharmAthene board designees, Jordan Karp or Francesca Cook.

In the fourth quarter of 2010, certain of PharmAthene’s officers, directors and beneficial owners of more than five percent of PharmAthene’s common stock converted, pursuant to an early conversion agreement, 10% convertible notes that PharmAthene had issued to them in July 2009, or the Notes. In exchange for the holders’ election to convert the Notes prior to their July 2011 maturity, in addition to receiving shares of PharmAthene’s common stock as a result of the conversion, the holders received cash payments corresponding to the interest foregone, i.e. the interest such holders would have received between the conversion date and the maturity date had they held the Notes through maturity. As of December 29, 2010, all remaining holders of these Notes, including affiliates, had converted their Notes, while one holder elected to have his Notes redeemed for cash. The following table summarizes the amount of Notes converted, interest accrued thereon and number of shares and amount of cash payments received by each of PharmAthene’s directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of more than five percent of PharmAthene’s common stock at the time of conversion.

           
Converting Noteholder*   Relationship at
Time of Conversion
  Principal Amount Converted**   Interest Accrued since July 28, 2009   Total Amount Converted (principal plus accrued interest)   Number of Shares Received   Cash Received
Healthcare Ventures VII, L.P.     5%+ stockholder,
affiliated with Director
    $ 2,107,483       271,045       2,378,528       935,814       156,305  
MPM Funds     5%+ stockholder,
affiliated with Director
    $ 5,468,315       703,286       6,171,601       2,428,171       405,567  
Derace L. Schaffer, M.D.     Director     $ 1,000,000       128,611       1,128,611       444,043       74,167  
Joel McCleary     Director     $ 42,242       5,433       47,675       18,757       3,133  
Eric I. Richman     President and Chief
Executive Officer
    $ 16,454       2,116       18,570       7,306       1,220  
Baker Bros.     5%+ stockholder     $ 7,000,000       964,445       7,964,444       3,133,551       207,667  

* This table does not include reference to a Note in the principal amount plus accrued interest of $1,128,611, which had been held by the wife of John Pappajohn, PharmAthene’s Chairman until July 2011. Mrs. Pappajohn had converted such Note into 444,044 shares of common stock and received $74,167 in cash.
** Except for Baker Bros., represents the largest aggregate amount of indebtedness outstanding vis-à-vis this creditor since the Notes were issued. For Baker Bros., the largest aggregate amount of indebtedness outstanding was $7,900,278.

There are no familial relationships among the individuals expected to serve as directors or executive officers of the combined company.

Theraclone Transactions

In addition to the compensation arrangements described in the sections entitled “THE MERGER — Interests of Theraclone’s Directors and Officers in the Merger” and “— Theraclone’s Executive Compensation” and “— Theraclone’s Director Compensation,” the following is a description of each transaction since January 1, 2010 and each currently proposed transaction in which:

Theraclone has been or is to be a participant;
the amount involved exceeds $120,000; and
any of Theraclone’s directors, executive officers or holders of more than 5% of its capital stock, or any immediate family member of or person sharing the household with any of these individuals, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

142


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Financing

In separate closings occurring from March 2010 through November 2011, Theraclone sold an aggregate of 8,723,069 shares of its Series B convertible preferred stock at a purchase price of $1.50 per share for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $13.1 million. In March 2013, Theraclone’s outstanding Series B convertible preferred stock converted to Series B-1 convertible preferred stock.

The following table summarizes the Series B convertible preferred stock purchased by Theraclone’s current directors, executive officers, persons who hold more than 5% of Theraclone’s outstanding capital stock or any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons.

   
Name of Stockholder   Shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock   Total Purchase Price
Canaan VII L.P.(1)     2,333,333     $ 3,500,000  
Entities affiliated with MPM Capital     1,906,397       2,859,596  
Entities affiliated with ARCH Venture Partners(2)     1,578,934       2,368,401  
Healthcare Ventures VIII, L.P.(3)     166,666       250,000  

(1) Wende S. Hutton, a member of Theraclone’s Board of Directors, is a general partner of Canaan Partners and, therefore, may be deemed to beneficially own these shares.
(2) Steven Gillis, Ph.D., a member of Theraclone’s Board of Directors, is a managing director of ARCH Venture Partners and, therefore, may be deemed to beneficially own these shares.
(3) Christopher Mirabelli, Ph.D., a member of Theraclone’s Board of Directors, is a managing director of Healthcare Ventures and, therefore, may be deemed to beneficially own these shares.

Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock Financing

In March 2013 and August 2013, Theraclone sold units consisting of an aggregate of 5,333,334 shares of its Series B-1 convertible preferred stock and warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 539,367 shares of Series B-1 Preferred Stock, at a purchase price of $1.50 per unit, for an aggregate purchase price of $8.0 million.

The following table summarizes the Series B-1 convertible preferred stock and warrants to purchase Series B-1 convertible preferred stock purchased by Theraclone’s current directors, executive officers, persons who hold more than 5% of Theraclone’s outstanding capital stock or any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons.

     
Name of Stockholder   Shares of
Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
  Warrants to Purchase Shares of
Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
  Total Purchase Price
Canaan VII L.P.(1)     1,415,612       236,952     $ 2,123,418  
Entities affiliated with ARCH Venture Partners(2)     1,704,157       285,257       2,556,686  
Healthcare Ventures VIII, L.P.(3)     408,247       17,158       612,371  
Entities affiliated with MPM Capital     593,024             889,536  
Wende S. Hutton(4)     8,090             12,135  
Steven Gillis, Ph.D.     8,090             12,135  

(1) Wende S. Hutton, a member of Theraclone’s Board of Directors, is a general partner of Canaan Partners and, therefore, may be deemed to beneficially own these shares.
(2) Steven Gillis, Ph.D., a member of Theraclone’s Board of Directors, is a managing director of ARCH Venture Partners and, therefore, may be deemed to beneficially own these shares.
(3) Christopher Mirabelli, Ph.D., a member of Theraclone’s Board of Directors, is managing director of Healthcare Ventures and, therefore, may be deemed to beneficially own these shares.
(4) Held by HUTTON LIVING TRUST dated 12/10/96, for which Wende S. Hutton, a member of Theraclone’s Board of Directors, serves as trustee.

143


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CERTAIN MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER

The following discussion summarizes certain material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger. This summary is based upon current provisions of the Code, existing Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder and current administrative rulings and court decisions, all of which are subject to change and to differing interpretations, possibly with retroactive effect. Any change could alter the tax consequences to PharmAthene, Theraclone or Theraclone stockholders, as described in this summary. This summary is not binding on the IRS, and there can be no assurance that the IRS (or a court, in the event of an IRS challenge) will agree with the conclusions stated herein.

This discussion does not address all of the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger that may be relevant to Theraclone stockholders and PharmAthene stockholders in light of their particular circumstances and does not apply to stockholders that are subject to special treatment under U.S. federal income tax laws, including, without limitation:

dealers, brokers and traders in currencies or securities;
individuals who are not citizens or residents of the United States, including U.S. expatriates;
corporations (or other entities treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized outside of the United States;
tax-exempt entities;
financial institutions, regulated investment companies, real estate investment trusts or insurance companies;
partnerships, limited liability companies that are not treated as corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes, subchapter S corporations and other pass-through entities and investors in such entities;
an estate or trust;
holders who are subject to the alternative minimum tax provisions of the Code;
holders who acquired their shares in connection with stock option or stock purchase plans or in other compensatory transactions;
holders who hold their shares through a pension plan or other qualified retirement plan;
holders who hold their shares as part of an integrated investment such as a hedge or as part of a hedging, straddle or other risk reduction strategy;
holders who do not hold their shares as capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (generally, property held for investment will be a capital asset); or
holders who have a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar.

In addition, the following discussion does not address:

the tax consequences of the merger under any U.S. federal non-income tax laws or under state, local or non-U.S. tax laws;
the tax consequences of transactions effectuated before, after or at the same time as the merger, whether or not they are in connection with the merger;
the tax consequences of the exchange of any Theraclone capital stock that constitutes “Section 306 stock” within the meaning of Section 306 of the Code;
the tax consequences of the receipt of shares of PharmAthene common stock other than in exchange for shares of Theraclone capital stock;
the tax consequences of the ownership or disposition of shares of PharmAthene common stock acquired in the merger; and

144


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

all of the tax implications of a failure of the merger to qualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.

Accordingly, Theraclone stockholders are advised and expected to consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger in light of their personal circumstances and the consequences of the merger under U.S. federal non-income tax laws and state, local and non-U.S. tax laws.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger

The merger is intended to qualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. Assuming that the merger will qualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, the following material U.S. federal income tax consequences should result:

PharmAthene, Theraclone and PharmAthene stockholders generally will recognize no gain or loss solely as a result of the merger;
Theraclone stockholders, other than Theraclone stockholders who exercise appraisal rights (as discussed below), generally will recognize no gain or loss upon the receipt of PharmAthene common stock for their Theraclone capital stock, other than with respect to cash received in lieu of fractional shares of PharmAthene common stock (as discussed below), imputed interest with respect to PharmAthene common stock distributed from Escrow to Theraclone stockholder (as described below), and gain or loss on PharmAthene (as discussed below);
the aggregate tax basis of the shares of PharmAthene common stock that are received by a Theraclone stockholder in the merger will be equal to the aggregate tax basis of the shares of Theraclone capital stock surrendered in exchange therefor, reduced by any amount allocable to a fractional share of PharmAthene common stock for which cash is received;
the holding period of the shares of PharmAthene common stock received by a Theraclone stockholder in connection with the merger will include the holding period of the shares of Theraclone capital stock surrendered in exchange therefor; and
a Theraclone stockholder who receives cash instead of a fractional share of PharmAthene common stock generally will recognize a capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference, if any, between such stockholder’s basis in the fractional share and the amount of cash received.

There will be no material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger for PharmAthene stockholders whether or not the merger qualifies as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.

Imputed Interest on Distributions of PharmAthene Common Stock from Escrow to Theraclone Stockholders

Distributions of PharmAthene common stock from the Escrow to the Theraclone stockholders are scheduled to be made nine (9) months after the Closing Date of the Merger (the “Indemnity Period”). However, if PharmAthene makes indemnification claims against the Escrow during the Indemnity Period, then those indemnity claims will be resolved before the distributions are made to PharmAthene for valid indemnity claims and to the Theraclone stockholders of any excess. It is possible that such PharmAthene indemnity claims will not be resolved until more than one year after the Closing Date of the Merger. If distributions of PharmAthene common stock are made to Theraclone stockholders more than one year after the Closing Date of the Merger, then a portion of each distribution of PharmAthene common stock from the Escrow to each Theraclone stockholder (even if made within one year after the Closing Date of the Merger) will be treated as imputed interest under Section 483 of the Code, based upon the applicable federal rate and the period between the Closing Date of the Merger and the date of the distribution of the PharmAthene common stock from the Escrow to the Theraclone stockholder. The imputed interest will ordinary income to the Theraclone stockholder, rather than capital gain, and will be subject to federal income tax at ordinary income tax rates, rather than long term capital gain tax rates.

145


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Gain or Loss to Theraclone Stockholders on Distributions of PharmAthene Common Stock from Escrow to PharmAthene

Distributions of PharmAthene common stock from the Escrow to PharmAthene for indemnification claims, valued for this purpose at the value of PharmAthene common stock as of the date of such distribution, will result in gain or loss to each Theraclone stockholder equal to such Theraclone stockholder's proportionate share of the value of such PharmAthene common stock distributed to PharmAthene, minus such Theraclone stockholder's adjusted basis in such PharmAthene common stock distributed to PharmAthene. Such gain or loss will generally be capital gain or loss.

Treatment of Theraclone Stockholders Who Exercise Appraisal Rights

The discussion above does not apply to Theraclone stockholders who properly perfect appraisal rights with respect to such stockholder’s shares of Theraclone capital stock. Generally, a Theraclone stockholder who perfects appraisal rights and receives cash in exchange for such stockholder’s Theraclone capital stock will recognize capital gain or loss measured by the difference between the amount of cash received and such stockholder’s adjusted tax basis in those shares. Such gain or loss will generally be long-term capital gain or loss, provided the shares of Theraclone capital stock were held for more than one year before the disposition of the shares. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.

Imputed Interest on Distributions of PharmAthene Common Stock from Escrow to Theraclone Stockholders More Than One Year After the Closing Date of the Merger.

Distributions of PharmAthene common stock from the Escrow to the Theraclone stockholders are scheduled to be made nine (9) months after the Closing Date of the Merger (the “Indemnity Period”). However, if PharmAthene makes indemnification claims against the Escrow during the Indemnity Period, then those indemnity claims will be resolved before the distributions are made to PharmAthene for valid indemnity claims and to the Theraclone stockholders of any excess. It is possible that such PharmAthene indemnity claims will not be resolved until more than one year after the Closing Date of the Merger. In such event, a portion of the distribution of PharmAthene common stock to each Theraclone stockholder will be treated as imputed interest under Section 483 of the Code, based upon the applicable federal rate in effect upon the Closing Date of the Merger and the period between the Closing Date of the Merger and the date of the distribution of the PharmAthene common stock from the escrow to the Theraclone stockholder. The imputed interest will ordinary income to the Theraclone stockholder, rather than capital gain, and will be subject to federal income tax at ordinary income tax rates, rather than long term capital gain tax rates.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

Generally, non-corporate Theraclone stockholders may be subject to information reporting and backup withholding (currently at a rate of 28 percent) with respect to cash received in lieu of a fractional share interest in PharmAthene common stock or cash received for perfecting appraisal rights. However, backup withholding will not apply to a Theraclone stockholder who furnishes a valid taxpayer identification number and complies with certain certification procedures or otherwise establishes an exemption from backup withholding. Backup withholding is not an additional U.S. federal income tax. Any amounts so withheld will be allowed as a refund or credit against the Theraclone stockholder’s U.S. federal income tax liability (if any), provided that the Theraclone stockholder timely furnishes the required information to the IRS.

The foregoing summary of material U.S. federal income tax consequences is not intended to be a complete analysis or description of all potential U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger. In addition, the summary does not address tax consequences that may vary with, or are contingent on, individual circumstances. Moreover, the summary does not address any U.S. federal non-income tax or any non-U.S., state or local tax consequences of the merger, nor any tax consequences of any transaction other than the merger. Accordingly, each Theraclone stockholder is strongly urged to consult his, her or its own tax advisor to determine the particular federal, state, local, or non-U.S. income or other tax consequences of the merger to such Theraclone stockholder.

146


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE’S BUSINESS

Overview

PharmAthene is a leading biodefense company engaged in the development and commercialization of next generation medical countermeasures against biological and chemical threats. PharmAthene’s current biodefense portfolio includes the following product candidates:

SparVax®, a next generation recombinant protective antigen anthrax vaccine;
rBChE (recombinant butyrylcholinesterase) bioscavenger, a medical countermeasure for nerve agent poisoning by organophosphorous compounds, including nerve gases and pesticides, and
Valortim®, a fully human monoclonal antibody for the prevention and treatment of anthrax infection.

In May 2013, the FDA lifted the clinical hold it had placed on SparVax® in August 2012. PharmAthene is now in discussions with BARDA regarding the commencement of its planned Phase II clinical trial for that product candidate.

In addition, in May 2013 the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed a September 2011 ruling of the Delaware Court of Chancery that SIGA had breached certain contractual obligations to PharmAthene. The matter is on remand to the Delaware Court of Chancery to determine a remedy in light of the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision. Previously the Delaware Court of Chancery had awarded PharmAthene the right to receive 50% of all net profits (as defined in the court’s final judgment) related to the sale of SIGA, ArestvyrTM (formerly known as ST-246®) and related products for 10 years following initial commercial sale of the drug once SIGA earns $40.0 million in net profits from the sales of ArestvyrTM and related products and a portion of PharmAthene’s attorney’s fees and expert witness and other costs. There can be no assurance that the Delaware Court of Chancery will re-instate its prior remedy or order another remedy for PharmAthene, that SIGA will not appeal any subsequent decision by the Delaware Court of Chancery, or that SIGA will not be successful in any subsequent appeal.

Information concerning PharmAthene’s financial position and results of operations can be found in its consolidated financial statements as well as in the section entitled “PHARMATHENE MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS” included in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation.

Background of PharmAthene

PharmAthene was formed in April 2005 as Healthcare Acquisition Corp., a special purpose acquisition company, formed solely to acquire a then unidentified business. On August 3, 2005, Healthcare Acquisition Corp. consummated its initial public offering. On August 3, 2007, Healthcare Acquisition Corp. acquired all the outstanding equity of PharmAthene, Inc., then a privately held Delaware corporation engaged in the biodefense business, and changed its name from Healthcare Acquisition Corp. to PharmAthene, Inc. This transaction is referred to herein as the 2007 Merger.

In March 2008, PharmAthene, Inc., through its wholly owned subsidiary PharmAthene UK Limited, acquired substantially all the assets and liabilities related to the biodefense vaccines business, or the Avecia Acquisition, of Avecia Biologics Limited, along with its affiliates, Avecia.

PharmAthene’s executive offices are located at One Park Place, Suite 450, Annapolis, Maryland 21401 and its telephone number is 410-269-2600. PharmAthene’s common stock trades on the NYSE MKT (formerly NYSE Amex) under the symbol “PIP.” PharmAthene maintains a website at http://www.PharmAthene.com. The information contained on or connected to PharmAthene’s website is expressly not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation. PharmAthene makes available for download free of charge through its website its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after it has electronically filed, or furnished, them to the SEC.

147


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Business Concept and Strategy

PharmAthene’s goal is to become one of the leading companies specializing in the development and commercialization of best-in-class prophylactic and therapeutic drugs for defense against biological and chemical threats and emerging infectious diseases worldwide. In assembling its product candidate portfolio, PharmAthene has adhered to a strategy emphasizing specific selection criteria to enhance the likelihood of U.S. government procurement. These selection criteria include:

demonstration of technical proof-of-concept in humans and/or appropriate animal models;
advantages over existing products or technologies;
demonstrated interest by the U.S. Government in procurement; and
a defined development path and regulatory strategy.

PharmAthene seeks to acquire and develop leading compounds and technologies targeting the highest priority U.S. Government biodefense requirements. PharmAthene also looks to bring products into its portfolio with dual-use potential that may serve both biodefense and commercial markets.

PharmAthene has developed and will continue to develop novel biodefense product development and contracting capabilities. Development of these capabilities has required a substantial investment, which it may leverage further through possible acquisitions of additional biodefense product candidates, whether under licensing deals, mergers and acquisitions, or otherwise. PharmAthene believes that product opportunities will come primarily from companies focused on commercial markets that wish to see their products or technologies exploited in biodefense.

Biodefense Industry

Market Overview:  The worldwide biodefense market can generally be divided into three segments: U.S. civilian, U.S. military, and non-U.S. markets. U.S. government funding represents the vast majority of the worldwide market. According to the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center - Center for Biosecurity, U.S. government biodefense military and civilian spending was over $5.7 billion in fiscal year 2011 and was estimated at approximately $5.6 billion in fiscal year 2012.

U.S. Civilian Market:  The U.S. civilian market includes funds to protect the U.S. population from biowarfare agents and is largely funded by the Project BioShield Act of 2004. Project BioShield, the U.S. government’s largest biodefense initiative, seeks to accelerate the research, development and purchase of medical countermeasures, or MCMs. At the end of calendar year 2012, approximately $500 million was in the Project BioShield Special Reserve fund, or SRF, set aside specifically for the procurement of MCMs. Currently, the government is operating under a continuing resolution at the fiscal year 2012 level. As $415 million was the level of annual funding for BARDA operations in fiscal year 2012, that amount is being transferred from the SRF to cover fiscal year 2013 operating expenses, and thus will not be available for product purchases for the U.S. Strategic National Stockpile, or SNS. Congress has yet to reach agreement on a budget for fiscal year 2014. Consequently, the amount and nature of future federal budget spending is uncertain.

The Pandemic and All Hazards Preparedness Act, or PAHPA, legislation reauthorizing key biodefense authorities was passed by Congress and signed into law in March 2013.

U.S. Military Market:  The Department of Defense or DoD, is responsible for the development and procurement of countermeasures for the military segment, which focuses on providing biowarfare protection for military personnel and civilians who are on active duty. Under the continuing resolution, DoD is currently operating at the fiscal year 2012 and is subject to the sequester. Congress has not reached agreement on a budget for fiscal year 2014. Consequently, fiscal year 2014 funding levels for DoD are unknown at this time.

Non-U.S. Markets:  Non-U.S. markets address protection against biowarfare agents for both civilians and military personnel in foreign countries. PharmAthene anticipates that foreign countries will procure biodefense products as they are developed and validated by procurement by the U.S. government.

148


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Project BioShield.  Project BioShield, established under the Project BioShield Act of 2004 and the U.S. government’s largest biodefense initiative, is focused on acquiring products with low technological risk that will be available for purchase in the near term. The U.S. government has identified the following threats as critical biodefense priorities: anthrax, smallpox, botulinum toxin, radiation, and nerve agent exposure. To evaluate and select the best products for these threats, the Department of Health and Human Services, or DHHS, typically issues Requests for Information followed by Requests for Proposals, or RFPs. RFPs detail product and procurement requirements including treatment types, numbers of doses and delivery timeframes. To qualify for Project BioShield funding, products must demonstrate product efficacy in an animal model and complete advanced development activities, and companies must show that they can provide sufficient manufacturing capability. As of June 30, 2013, nine awards have been made under Project BioShield, including those for the treatment or prevention of anthrax, smallpox, radiation and botulinum toxin.

Anthrax

The three general modes of infection by Bacillus anthracis or B. anthracis, the bacterium which causes anthrax infection, are by inhalation, ingestion or skin contact with anthrax spores. Inhalational anthrax is the most lethal form of infection and occurs when anthrax spores become airborne and enter a person’s body through the lungs. Inhalational anthrax is almost always fatal if left untreated; the mortality rate in patients treated aggressively with antibiotics and supportive care is 50% or less. Persons infected by B. anthracis that is ingested will suffer from gastrointestinal anthrax; those whose skin comes into contact with anthrax will suffer from cutaneous anthrax. Gastrointestinal anthrax has a mortality rate of more than 40% if left untreated. Cutaneous anthrax generally causes skin infections within a week or two after exposure. Cutaneous anthrax is the least fatal. Without treatment, approximately 20% of all skin infection cases are fatal. Treated cutaneous anthrax is rarely fatal.

The DoD estimates that up to ten countries may possess anthrax weapons and an undetermined number of individuals and terrorist groups could have access to anthrax. Anthrax is an effective bioterrorism agent because the spores are stable for extended periods of time (years), can be milled to a fine powder, and can be widely dispersed with readily available instruments and machinery. The U.S. Congressional Office of Technology Assessment in 1993 analyzed the potential scope of an anthrax attack, calculating that there would be between 130,000 and 3 million deaths following the release of 100 kilograms of anthrax in a highly populated area.

In light of the limited effectiveness of current antibiotics and supportive care, PharmAthene believes that currently available treatments for inhalational anthrax — antibiotics and vaccines — are suboptimal. Following exposure, but prior to the onset of symptoms, antibiotics like ciprofloxacin, doxycycline or penicillin can be used as post-exposure prophylaxis with the goal of preventing progression of the disease with a recommended antibiotic course of treatment of 60 days, sometimes in combination with the administration of an existing anthrax vaccine. PharmAthene believes that both compliance and side effects are problematic for anyone asked to take antibiotics for such an extended period of time. Furthermore, antibiotic resistance, whether naturally occurring or genetically engineered, is a concern.

Smallpox

Smallpox virus is classified as a Category ‘A’ agent by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and is considered one of the most significant threats for use as a biowarfare agent. Although declared eradicated in 1979 by the World Health Organization, or the WHO, there is a threat that a rogue nation or a terrorist group may already possess or have the capability to produce an illegal inventory of the virus that causes smallpox. Inventories of the virus are known to be contained under extremely tight security at the CDC in Atlanta, Georgia and at the Vector laboratory in Russia.

Many scientists agree that with the scientific tools available today smallpox can be created by modifying another orthopox virus available naturally worldwide by a scientist with access to a modern laboratory. Studies conducted prior to the eradication of natural reservoirs of smallpox virus show that the disease has a mortality rate of 30% or higher, and survivors are scarred and can suffer other permanent detriments.

Chemical Weapons and Nerve Agents

Chemical weapons use the toxic properties of chemical substances to produce physiological effects on an enemy or civilian target. Classic chemical weapons, such as chlorine and phosgene, were employed during

149


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

World War I and consisted primarily of commercial chemicals used as choking and blood agents, to cause respiratory damage and asphyxiation. Organophosphorous agents (nerve agents), one of the most lethal forms of chemical weapons, were developed in the 1930s in the years leading up to World War II.

Nerve agents function by binding to acetylcholinesterase, an enzyme that normally causes termination of the activity of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine. Nerve agents block the activity of acetylcholinesterase, allowing the activity of acetylcholine to continue unchecked. As a result, nerve impulses are continually transmitted, causing muscle contractions that do not stop. This effect is referred to as a “cholinergic crisis” and results in a loss of muscle control, respiratory failure, paralysis and convulsions. Nerve agent exposure that does not cause death after a short period can lead to permanent brain damage.

There is currently only one FDA-approved pre-treatment for nerve agents, pyridostigmine bromide, or PB. PB is only approved for the pre-treatment of exposure to the nerve agent soman. It confers no protection on its own but enhances the protection conferred by post-exposure treatment. The standard of care for post-exposure treatment involves repeated doses of a cocktail of drugs including atropine, reactivators including the oxime 2-PAM, and anti-convulsants. However, this type of treatment acts primarily on the symptoms of nerve agents, not their underlying cause. PharmAthene believes available pre-and post-treatment options are inadequate and that there is a need for more efficacious countermeasures, especially as evidence mounts that modified, more toxic forms of nerve agents may be used in future attacks.

Product Candidates

SparVax®:  Recombinant Protective Antigen (PA)-based Anthrax Vaccine

SparVax® is a second generation, rPA anthrax vaccine designed to protect against inhalational anthrax, the most lethal form of B. anthracis infection in humans. The vaccine has been shown to induce anti-Protective Antigen, or PA, antibodies in clinical trials in healthy human volunteers and in animal models of inhalational anthrax. These antibodies are believed to function by targeting PA, a protein component necessary for the transportation of bacterial toxins into the cell and the subsequent toxic cascade that leads to morbidity and mortality. Vaccination with SparVax® generates high titers of antibodies and up to 100% efficacy in rabbits and non-human primates that are subsequently exposed to lethal inhalation doses of anthrax spores. One Phase I and two Phase II clinical trials have been completed involving approximately 770 individuals. Data from these trials demonstrated that SparVax® is generally well tolerated, and immunogenic.

SparVax® is being developed for two indications: post-exposure prophylaxis, or PEP, in conjunction with antibiotics and general use prophylaxis, or GUP. In a PEP setting, the vaccine would be administered following a suspected exposure to augment the natural immune response and provide protection once antibiotics are discontinued. In the GUP setting, the vaccine is administered in advance of any exposure and is intended to induce an immune response that will be protective should there be an exposure.

Preclinical Safety Studies

Prior to an Investigational New Drug, or IND, application being filed with the FDA, SparVax® underwent safety testing in mice, rats, and rabbits and non-human primates. SparVax® was well tolerated with no deaths and no behavioral or clinical signs observed in all species. All of the toxicology studies were compliant with Good Laboratory Practices, or GLP, and the data were used to support the IND and allowed for the initiation of clinical trials of SparVax®.

Non-clinical Studies

Clinical trials to demonstrate efficacy of an anthrax vaccine in humans are unethical; therefore, PharmAthene’s strategy is to obtain licensure of SparVax® via the FDA’s Animal Rule (21 CFR 601.90) which allows for efficacy testing in appropriate animal models in lieu of human clinical efficacy trials. To date, a majority of its animal model development and efficacy studies in both rabbits and non-human primates for both GUP and PEP indications using SparVax® have been sponsored by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, or NIAID, and conducted by a contract research organization. Data from these studies have shown that SparVax® is immunogenic and efficacious in both rabbits and non-human primates and that immunogenicity and protection against an aerosol challenge are dependent on vaccine dosage; the vaccine used in these studies was manufactured using drug substance manufactured at Avecia. A rabbit efficacy study

150


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

was performed following the successful transfer of technology and scale up to a 1,500 liter (bioreactor) commercial scale process. The results of this recent study confirm previous findings that immunogenicity and protection conferred by SparVax® are dependent upon vaccine dosage. Moreover, these results and other studies have demonstrated that the drug product made using drug substance manufactured at FUJIfilm Diosynth Biotechnologies USA, or Diosynth, is comparable to the vaccine based on drug substance manufactured at Avecia.

Clinical Trials

The Phase I trial was a dose escalation study designed to evaluate a range of dosage levels administered with either of two different dosing schedules. There were no vaccine-related serious adverse events or changes in blood chemistries, vital signs or electrocardiograms, or ECGs, reported. The results demonstrated that the vaccine was generally well tolerated, and immunogenic and that the immunogenic response was dependent on vaccine dosage.

The Phase II program was designed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the two highest dosages tested in Phase I using a three dose regimen in a larger number of subjects. Two Phase II trials were conducted, both of which studied the effect of different vaccine dosage levels and schedules.

In the Phase IIa trial, SparVax® was shown to be immunogenic, and generally well tolerated with no vaccine-related serious adverse events.

The Phase IIb trial compared a longer dosing regimen at two different vaccine dosages with a smaller control group that received the currently licensed anthrax vaccine, BioThrax®. As in the Phase IIa trial, SparVax® was immunogenic, and generally well tolerated with no vaccine-related serious adverse events. The immunogenicity data showed that SparVax® elicited an immune response after the primary immunization series as well as having induced an anamnestic response after a booster dose given at 6 or 12 months after the primary dosing schedule. While both SparVax® and BioThrax® were immunogenic following a 3-dose series with seroconversion rates of approximately 90% (as measured by ELISA titers), an increased proportion of individuals experienced injection site pain in the BioThrax® group (where the vaccine was administered subcutaneously) as compared to the SparVax® groups.

Future studies will seek to confirm the dose and schedule of SparVax® that induces antibody levels in humans which are comparable to those shown to be protective in the animal models, demonstrate the acceptability of using SparVax® in conjunction with antibiotics, and confirm the safety of SparVax® in a sufficient number of human subjects (as required by FDA).

Product Stability

In 2011, PharmAthene announced that SparVax® product produced from bulk drug substance manufactured at Avecia Biologics Laboratories in the United Kingdom had demonstrated 52 month stability. Moreover, PharmAthene has demonstrated over 36 month stability for its final drug product vaccine formulation based on bulk drug substance manufactured at Avecia. The stability data were prepared utilizing a variety of analytical methods and a mouse challenge potency assay. Subsequent to the transfer of manufacturing technology to Diosynth, one 1,500 liter engineering lot of bulk drug substance and one 1,500 liter GMP lot of bulk drug substance were manufactured at Diosynth; engineering and GMP lots of final drug product were manufactured from aliquots of the engineering and GMP lots of bulk drug substance, respectively. The GMP bulk drug substance and final drug product lots are currently on formal International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, or ICH, compliant stability programs. In parallel, the stability of the engineering lots of bulk drug substance and final drug product is also being monitored to support the findings from the formal stability programs. Data obtained to date demonstrate that the bulk drug substance produced at Diosynth is stable for at least 18 months and the final drug product derived from Diosynth bulk drug substance is stable for at least 18 months.

In August 2012, PharmAthene received notification from the FDA that PharmAthene’s SparVax® rPA anthrax vaccine program was placed on clinical hold prior to initiating any patient dosing. The FDA has requested additional stability data and information related to the stability indicating assays. PharmAthene provided supporting data and information to the FDA and commenced discussions with that agency as well as its customer, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), regarding the clinical

151


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

hold. FDA lifted the clinical hold in May 2013, and PharmAthene is currently in discussions with BARDA regarding obtaining additional funding and consent for the planned Phase II human clinical trial with SparVax® which PharmAthene hopes to commence in the fourth quarter of 2013.

Funding

To date, funding for the development of SparVax® has occurred under two contracts from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) originally entered into in 2002 and 2003 which, not including the modification discussed below, provided for aggregate funding of up to approximately $128 million.

In April 2009, the United States Government transferred the SparVax® contract to BARDA. In February 2010, PharmAthene and BARDA entered into negotiations to modify their existing advanced development contract for SparVax®. During the base period of performance under the contract modification PharmAthene has been funded up to approximately $62 million on a cost-reimbursement-plus-fixed-fee basis, assuming that all milestones are achieved. The contract was subsequently modified to extend the period of performance through February 2014. As of June 30, 2013, approximately $18.6 million remains available under base contract funding. In August 2013 BARDA made available an additional $8 million to help support a Phase II clinical trial for SparVax®, a non-clinical rabbit study involving SparVax®, as well as additional work. In addition, approximately $17 million in unfunded options remained under the contract. It is unclear when or if BARDA will consider a new funding request.

Recombinant Human Butyrylcholinesterase Nerve Agent Countermeasure

In 2006, PharmAthene entered into a contract with the DoD to develop its Protexia® medical countermeasure for chemical nerve agent exposure to protect the warfighter from physiological damage. This program utilized the recombinant enzyme butyrylcholinesterase, or rBChE, a naturally occurring bioscavenger, as its active ingredient. This first generation program for producing rBChE utilized transgenic goats to produce the enzyme in their milk. This contract expired on December 31, 2010, and PharmAthene shut down its Protexia® related operations and sold its production facilities in December 2011.

PharmAthene has also been working on a second generation approach, which PharmAthene refers to as its Advanced Expression System, or AES, that utilizes a mammalian-cell-based expression system (i.e. the PER.C6® human cell line) for rBChE. In August 2011 DoD awarded PharmAthene a fixed price contract for up to approximately $5.7 million to support its on-going research into the production of rBChE using this mammalian-cell culture-based advanced expression system. As of June 30, 2013, approximately $0.6 million remains available under this contract. While the AES technology is still at an early research stage, if its efforts are successful, PharmAthene believes this cell culture-based approach could have significant advantages over the transgenic goat-based approach originally developed to produce Protexia®. Specifically, PharmAthene believes these advantages could include:

An established manufacturing platform, consistent with those used for other biotechnology products and with the U.S. government’s recent advanced manufacturing system initiative;
Final product with a pharmacokinetic (PK) profile that more closely resembles naturally occurring butyrylcholinesterase, or BChE, from human blood;
Higher production yields than a transgenic goat based approach;
Substantially lower costs of production to yield significant savings to PharmAthene’s DoD and, potentially, civilian customers;
A more traditional and streamlined regulatory path to FDA licensure; and
Greater ability to scale up production if demand increases.

In December 2012, PharmAthene exclusively licensed from Percivia the rights for use of the PER.C6® human cell line for the manufacture of PharmAthene’s rBChE product. This platform offers many advantages over traditional expression systems and should enable the final product to have a pharmacokinetic profile that more closely matches the naturally occurring BChE found in human plasma.

152


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Valortim®:  Anthrax Monoclonal Antibody

Valortim® is a fully human monoclonal antibody designed to protect against and treat human inhalational anthrax, as both post-exposure prophylaxis (i.e., before symptoms manifest) and post-exposure therapy (i.e., once symptoms are evident). Valortim® utilizes a novel mechanism of action similar to natural immune response. Valortim® is designed to bind to PA and protect the cells from damage by the anthrax toxins. In non-clinical studies, animals were protected against this fatal disease when Valortim® was administered following a lethal aerosol challenge of anthrax spores, demonstrating that Valortim® induces recovery and survival in animals exposed to inhalational anthrax.

BMS Collaboration and Development Timeline

PharmAthene is developing Valortim® in collaboration with Bristol Myers Squibb, or BMS, pursuant to a collaboration agreement entered into in November 2004. Under the terms of the collaboration agreement, PharmAthene and BMS will share operating profits according to a formula that establishes its share of the profits at between 20% and 60%, with the final split largely dependent on the amount of funding provided by PharmAthene prior to sale of product to the U.S. government. Prior to distribution of operating profits, each party is entitled to reimbursement of research and development expenses incurred that were not otherwise covered by government funding. Valortim® has received Fast Track designation from the FDA as well as orphan drug status.

Clinical and Non-clinical Studies

Valortim® is being developed for two indications: (i) post-exposure prophylaxis; and (ii) as a therapeutic.

Clinical Phase I Trials

In 2006 PharmAthene and BMS completed an initial Phase I open-label, dose-escalation clinical trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetics (the study of absorption, metabolism and action of drugs) of a single dose of Valortim® administered intravenously or intramuscularly in healthy volunteers. No drug-related serious adverse effects were reported. In August 2009 PharmAthene began a second Phase I clinical trial of Valortim® in combination with the antibiotic ciprofloxacin. During the course of the study, there were two serious adverse events, so PharmAthene halted the trial and the FDA placed the study on partial clinical hold. Following an investigation, the FDA lifted the partial clinical hold in December 2010, and PharmAthene then commenced and completed an intravenous (IV) dose-escalation study of Valortim®. PharmAthene submitted the final study report to FDA for the trial in January 2012.

Non-clinical Studies

PharmAthene has conducted studies in two animal models to evaluate the use of Valortim® as a post-exposure prophylaxis. Treatment in both animal models was initiated within one hour following exposure to the anthrax spores. Eighty-five percent of rabbits treated intravenously with doses of Valortim® survived following inhalation exposure to anthrax spores. One hundred percent of cynomolgus monkeys treated intramuscularly with doses of Valortim® were protected from death following exposure to inhalational anthrax spores.

PharmAthene has conducted studies in rabbits to evaluate the use of Valortim® as a therapeutic intervention for inhalational anthrax. This indication for Valortim® would be intended to treat patients who have already developed signs and/or symptoms of inhalational anthrax. In two studies, up to 100% of the animals survived that were treated with Valortim® intravenously at the time they tested positive for the presence of PA in the blood or had significant increases in body temperature.

PharmAthene has also conducted two studies in African green monkeys treated with Valortim® at the time they tested positive for the presence of PA in the blood. Up to 70% of animals treated intravenously with Valortim® survived. In contrast, the mortality rate for animals exposed to inhalational anthrax that received a saline control at the time they tested positive for the presence of PA in the blood is close to 100%.

Funding

In 2006 and 2008, PharmAthene received DoD funding for the advancement of Valortim® in the aggregate amount of $4.2 million, all of which was received by December 31, 2012. In September 2007,

153


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

NIAID awarded PharmAthene a $13.9 million contract for the advanced development of Valortim® as an anti-toxin therapeutic to treat inhalational anthrax infection. In April 2009 that amount was increased to $15.9 million (which was reduced to $15.3 million in August 2010). Funding from NIAID ran through January 31, 2012, when this contract ended.

In August 2012, PharmAthene responded to BARDA Solicitation RFP-12-100-SOL-00026, an Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (ID/IQ) contract for the acquisition of anthrax antitoxins. In November 2012, BARDA notified PharmAthene that PharmAthene’s proposal was within the competitive range for award consideration, and in January 2013 PharmAthene submitted PharmAthene’s Final Proposal Revision. While the ID/IQ would not guarantee funding for the Valortim® program, if awarded it would provide PharmAthene with a contract vehicle under which to compete for specific work orders submitted by BARDA on an expedited basis with others included in the ID/IQ contract.

There can be no assurance PharmAthene will be successful in obtaining additional financial support for this program.

PharmAthene’s Interest in ARESTVYRTM:  Smallpox antiviral

ArestvyrTM, which is being developed by SIGA, is an orally administered antiviral drug candidate to treat orthopox virus diseases including smallpox. ArestvyrTM acts by blocking the ability of the virus to spread to other cells, preventing it from causing disease. The FDA has designated ArestvyrTM for “fast-track status” enabling potential expedited FDA review and approval. In addition, ArestvyrTM has been granted Orphan Drug designation for both the treatment and prevention of smallpox.

In addition, in May 2013, the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed a September 2011 ruling of the Delaware Court of Chancery that SIGA had breached certain contractual obligations to PharmAthene. The matter is on remand to the Delaware Court of Chancery to determine a remedy in light of the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision. Previously the Delaware Court of Chancery had awarded PharmAthene the right to receive 50% of all net profits (as defined in the court’s final judgment) related to the sale of SIGA’s ArestvyrTM (formerly known as ST-246®) and related products for 10 years following initial commercial sale of the drug once SIGA earns $40.0 million in net profits from the sales of ArestvyrTM and related products and a portion of PharmAthene’s attorney’s fee and expert witness and other costs.

SIGA indicated in its investor conference call held on August 5, 2013 that it had delivered approximately 590,000 courses of ArestvyrTM to BARDA and billed the government $79.0 million for that product. SIGA also stated that it expects to fully deliver 2 million courses of ArestvyrTM by the end of 2014. As a result of the Delaware Supreme Court’s May 2013 decision, there can be no assurance that the Chancery Court will issue a remedy that provides PharmAthene with a financial interest in ArestvyrTM and related products or any remedy. Even if the Court of Chancery does provide PharmAthene with a remedy that provides PharmAthene with a financial interest in ArestvyrTM, PharmAthene may never receive any proceeds from SIGA’s future sales of that product. SIGA’s ability to deliver product to the SNS, and the timing thereof, is subject to a number of significant risks and uncertainties (certain of which are outlined in SIGA’s filings with the SEC), as to which PharmAthene has limited knowledge and which it has no ability to control, mitigate or fully evaluate. For a description of risk related to this litigation, see “RISK FACTORS — Risks Related to PharmAthene’s Financial Condition — PharmAthene’s interest in ArestvyrTM and related products is subject to the risk of an appeal of the judgment by SIGA and other risks.”

U.S. Government Regulation of Biological Products

General

Regulation by governmental authorities in the United States and other countries will have a significant impact on PharmAthene’s research, product development, manufacturing and marketing of any biopharmaceutical products. The nature and the extent to which regulations apply to PharmAthene will vary depending on the nature of any such products. PharmAthene’s potential biopharmaceutical products will require regulatory approval by governmental agencies prior to commercialization. The products PharmAthene is developing are subject to federal regulation in the United States, principally by the FDA under the Public Health Service Act and Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or FFDCA, and by state and local

154


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

governments, as well as regulatory and other authorities in foreign governments that include rigorous preclinical and clinical testing and other approval procedures. Such regulations govern or influence, among other things, the research, development, testing, manufacture, safety and efficacy requirements, labeling, storage, recordkeeping, licensing, advertising, promotion, distribution and export of products, manufacturing and the manufacturing process. In many foreign countries, such regulations also govern the prices charged for products under their respective national social security systems and availability to consumers.

The Public Health Service Act classifies PharmAthene’s current drug candidates which are produced using biological systems, as biological drug products, or Biologics. All drugs intended for human use, including Biologics, are subject to rigorous regulation by the FDA in the United States and similar regulatory bodies in other countries. The steps ordinarily required by the FDA before a biological drug product may be marketed in the United States are similar to steps required in most other countries and include, but are not limited to:

completion of preclinical laboratory tests, preclinical animal testing and formulation studies;
submission to the FDA of an Investigational New Drug application, or IND, which must be in effect before clinical trials may commence;
submission to the FDA of a Biologics License Application, or BLA that includes preclinical data, clinical trial data and manufacturing information;
FDA review of the BLA;
satisfactory completion of an FDA pre-approval inspection of the manufacturing facilities; and
FDA approval of the BLA, including approval of all product labeling.

The research, development and approval process requires substantial time, effort and financial resources, and approvals may not be granted on a timely or commercially viable basis, if at all.

Preclinical testing includes laboratory evaluations to characterize the product’s composition, impurities, stability, and mechanism of its biologic effect, as well as animal studies to assess the potential safety, purity and potency of each product. Preclinical safety tests must be conducted by laboratories that comply with FDA regulations regarding Good Laboratory Practices, or GLP, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal Welfare Act. Violations of these laws and regulations can, in some cases, lead to invalidation of the tests, requiring such tests to be repeated and delaying approval of the BLA. The results of the preclinical tests, together with manufacturing information and analytical data, are submitted to the FDA as part of an IND and are reviewed by the FDA before the commencement of human clinical trials. Unless the FDA objects to an IND by placing the study on clinical hold, the IND will go into effect 30 days following its receipt by the FDA. The FDA may authorize trials only on specified terms and may suspend clinical trials at any time on various grounds, including a finding that patients are being exposed to unacceptable health risks. If the FDA places a study on clinical hold, the sponsor must resolve all of the FDA’s concerns before the study may proceed. The IND application process may become extremely costly and substantially delay development of products. Similar restrictive requirements also apply in other countries. Additionally, positive results of preclinical tests will not necessarily indicate positive results in clinical trials.

Clinical trials involve the administration of the investigational product to humans under the supervision of qualified principal investigators. PharmAthene’s clinical trials must be conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice, or GCP, regulations under protocols submitted to the FDA as part of an IND. In addition, each clinical trial is approved and conducted under the auspices of an institutional review board, or IRB, and requires the patients’ informed consent. The IRB considers, among other things, ethical factors, the safety of human subjects, and the possibility of liability of the institutions conducting the trial. The IRB at each institution at which a clinical trial is being performed may suspend a clinical trial at any time for a variety of reasons, including a belief that the test subjects are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk. Since PharmAthene’s products are being developed using funding from the U.S. government, additional review by either the NIH’s IRB or the DoD’s IRB-equivalent will also be required. These reviews take place following approval by the independent IRB. As the sponsor, PharmAthene can also suspend or terminate a clinical trial at any time.

155


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Clinical trials are typically conducted in three sequential phases, Phases I, II, and III, involving an increasing number of human subjects. These phases may sometimes overlap or be combined. Phase I trials are performed in a small number of healthy human subjects or subjects with the targeted condition, and involve testing for safety, dosage tolerance, absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion or immunogenicity for vaccine products. Phase II studies, which may involve up to hundreds of subjects, seek to identify possible adverse effects and safety risks, preliminary information related to the efficacy of the product for specific targeted diseases, dosage tolerance, and optimal dosage. Finally, Phase III trials may involve up to thousands of individuals often at geographically dispersed clinical trial sites, and are intended to provide the documentation of effectiveness and important additional safety data required for licensing. Prior to commencing Phase III clinical trials many sponsors elect to meet with FDA officials to discuss the conduct and design of the proposed trial or trials.

In addition, federal law requires the listing, on a publicly-available website, of detailed information on clinical trials for investigational drugs. Some states have similar or supplemental clinical trial reporting laws.

In 2002, the FDA amended its requirements applicable to BLAs to permit the approval of certain Biologics that are intended to reduce or prevent serious or life-threatening conditions based on evidence of safety from trial in healthy subjects and effectiveness from appropriate animal studies when human efficacy studies are not ethical or feasible. These regulations, also known as the Animal Rule, and published in the Code of Federal Regulations (21 CFR 601 Subpart H), authorize the FDA to rely on evidence from animal studies to provide evidence of a product’s effectiveness under circumstances where there is a reasonably well-understood mechanism for the toxicity of the agent. Under these requirements, and with FDA’s prior agreement, Biologics used to reduce or prevent the toxicity of chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear substances may be approved for use in humans based on evidence of effectiveness derived from appropriate animal studies and any additional supporting data. Products evaluated for effectiveness under this rule are evaluated for safety under preexisting requirements for establishing the safety of new drug and biological products, including Phase I through Phase II clinical trials. Under certain circumstances a single animal species may be acceptable if that animal model is sufficiently well-characterized for predicting a response in humans. The animal study endpoint must be clearly related to the desired benefit in humans and the information obtained from animal studies must allow for selection of an effective dose in humans. Products approved under the Animal Rule are subject to additional requirements including post-marketing study requirements, restrictions imposed on marketing or distribution or requirements to provide information to patients.

PharmAthene intends to rely on the Animal Rule in seeking marketing approval for its product candidates because it cannot ethically expose humans to anthrax, or nerve agents. Other countries do not, at this time, have established criteria for review and approval of these types of products outside their normal review process, i.e. there is no Animal Rule equivalent in countries other than the United States.

Success in early-stage animal studies and clinical trials does not necessarily assure success in later-stage clinical trials. Data obtained from animal studies and clinical activities are not always conclusive and may be subject to alternative interpretations that could delay, limit or even prevent regulatory approval.

All data obtained from the preclinical studies and clinical trials, in addition to detailed information on the manufacture and composition of the product, would be submitted in a BLA to the FDA for review and approval for the manufacture, marketing and commercial shipments of any of PharmAthene’s products. FDA approval of the BLA is required before commercial marketing or non-investigational interstate shipment may begin in the United States. The FDA may also conduct an audit of the clinical trial data used to support the BLA.

However, under the Project BioShield Act of 2004, or Project BioShield, the Secretary of the DHHS may, with the concurrence of the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, or DHS, and upon the approval of the President, contract to purchase unapproved countermeasures for the SNS in specified circumstances. The U.S. Congress is notified of a recommendation for a stockpile purchase after Presidential approval. Project BioShield specifies that a company supplying the countermeasure to the SNS is paid on delivery of a substantial portion of the countermeasure. To be eligible for purchase under these provisions, the Secretary of DHHS must determine that there are sufficient and satisfactory clinical results or research data,

156


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

including data, if available, from preclinical and clinical trials, to support a reasonable conclusion that the countermeasure will qualify for approval or licensing within eight years. The legislation also allows unlicensed products to be procured for the SNS so that they are available at the time an emergency is declared.

Project BioShield also allows the Secretary of DHHS to authorize the emergency use of medical products that have not yet been approved by the FDA. To exercise this authority, the Secretary of DHHS must conclude that:

the agent for which the countermeasure is designed can cause serious or life-threatening disease;
the product may reasonably be believed to be effective in detecting, diagnosing, treating or preventing the disease;
the known and potential benefits of the product outweigh its known and potential risks; and
there is no adequate alternative to the product that is approved and available.

Although this provision permits the Secretary of DHHS to circumvent the FDA approval process, its use would be limited to rare circumstances.

PharmAthene’s products will be eligible both for consideration for procurement into the SNS and for use in the event of an emergency, although there is no guarantee that PharmAthene’s products will meet the criteria set forth by DHHS or the FDA for procurement and Emergency Use Authorization, or EUA, respectively.

With regard to a BLA, the FDA may deny or delay approval of an application that does not meet applicable regulatory criteria, e.g. if the FDA determines that the preclinical or clinical data or the manufacturing information does not adequately establish the safety, purity and potency (including efficacy) of the Biologic. The FDA has substantial discretion in the approval process and may disagree with an applicant’s interpretation of the data submitted in its BLA. The FDA can request additional information, seek clarification regarding information already provided in the submission or ask that clinical trials be conducted, all of which can delay approval. The FDA also may, at any time, require the submission of product samples and testing protocols for lot-by-lot confirmatory review or testing, known as lot release, by the FDA prior to commercial distribution. This means a specific lot of Biologic cannot be released for commercial distribution until the FDA has authorized such release. Similar types of regulatory processes will be encountered as efforts are made to market any Biologic internationally. PharmAthene will be required to assure product performance and manufacturing processes from one country to another.

If the FDA approves a product, it may limit the approved uses for the product as described in the product labeling, require that contraindications, warning statements or precautions be included in the product labeling, require that additional studies be conducted following approval as a condition of the approval, impose restrictions and conditions on product distribution, prescribing or dispensing in the form of a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy, or REMS, or otherwise limit the scope of any approval or limit labeling. Once it approves a BLA, the FDA may revoke or suspend the product approval if compliance with post-market regulatory standards is not maintained or if problems occur after the product reaches the marketplace. In addition, the FDA may require post-marketing studies to monitor the effect of approved products, and may limit further marketing of the product based on the results of these post-market studies. The Animal Rule requires post-marketing studies, such as field studies, to verify and describe the product’s clinical benefit and assess its safety should an exigency exists that leads to the product being used in humans; the nature of these studies will be discussed with FDA as part of the BLA process. The FDA has broad post-market regulatory and enforcement powers, including the ability to levy civil and criminal penalties, suspend or delay issuance of approvals, seize or recall products and revoke approvals.

The FDA’s Fast Track designation program is designed to facilitate the development and review of new drugs, including biological products that are intended to treat serious or life-threatening conditions and that demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical needs for the conditions. Fast Track designation applies to a combination of the product and the specific indication for which it is being studied. Thus, it is the development program for a specific drug for a specific indication that receives Fast Track designation. The

157


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

sponsor of a product designated as being in a Fast Track drug development program may engage in early communication with the FDA, including timely meetings and early feedback on clinical trials, and may submit portions of an application on a rolling basis rather than waiting to submit a complete application. Products in Fast Track drug development programs also may receive priority review or accelerated approval, under which an application may be reviewed within six months after a complete NDA or BLA is accepted for filing or sponsors may rely on a surrogate endpoint for approval, respectively. The FDA may notify a sponsor that its program is no longer classified as a Fast Track development program if the Fast Track designation is no longer supported by emerging data or the designated drug development program is no longer being pursued.

Biologics manufacturers, distributors and their subcontractors are required to register their facilities with the FDA and state agencies and are subject to periodic inspection by the FDA and other authorities, where applicable, and must comply with the FDA’s current Good Manufacturing Practices, or cGMP, regulations, the FDA’s general biological product standards, and the product establishment standards set forth in the approved BLA. The cGMP requirements for biological products in particular are extensive and compliance with them requires considerable time, resources and ongoing investment. The regulations require manufacturers to establish validated systems to ensure that products meet high standards of sterility, purity and potency. The requirements apply to all stages of the manufacturing process, including the synthesis, processing, sterilization, packaging, labeling, storage and shipment of the biological product. For all drugs and biological products, the regulations require investigation and correction of any deviations from cGMP requirements and impose documentation requirements upon PharmAthene and any third party manufacturers that it may decide to use. Manufacturing establishments are subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA and state agencies for compliance with all cGMP requirements. The FDA is authorized to inspect manufacturing facilities without a warrant at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner.

PharmAthene or its present or future suppliers may not be able to comply with cGMP and other FDA regulatory requirements. Failure to comply with the statutory and regulatory requirements subjects the manufacturer to possible legal or regulatory action, such as a delay or refusal to approve a BLA, suspension of manufacturing, seizure or recall of a product, or civil or criminal prosecution of the company or individual officers or employees.

Post-Marketing Regulation

Any products manufactured or distributed by PharmAthene pursuant to FDA licenses or approvals are subject to pervasive and continuing regulation by the FDA, including:

recordkeeping requirements;
periodic reporting requirements;
cGMP requirements related to all stages of manufacturing, testing, storage, packaging, labeling and distribution of finished dosage forms of the product;
reporting of adverse experiences with the product; and
advertising and promotion restrictions.

Adverse experiences with the product must be reported to the FDA and could result in the imposition of market restriction through labeling changes or in product removal. Product approvals may be revoked if compliance with regulatory requirements is not maintained or if problems concerning safety or effectiveness of the product occur following approval. As a condition of NDA or BLA approval, the FDA may require post-approval testing and surveillance to monitor a product’s safety or efficacy. The FDA also may impose other conditions, including labeling restrictions which can materially impact the potential market and profitability of a product.

With respect to post-market product advertising and promotion, the FDA imposes a number of complex regulations on entities that advertise and promote Biologics, including, among others, standards and restrictions on direct-to-consumer advertising, off-label promotion, industry-sponsored scientific and educational activities and promotional activities involving the Internet. The FDA has very broad enforcement authority under the FFDCA, and failure to abide by these regulations can result in administrative and judicial enforcement actions, including the issuance of a Warning Letter directing correction of deviations from FDA

158


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

standards, a requirement that future advertising and promotional materials be pre-cleared by the FDA, and state and federal civil and criminal investigations and prosecutions. Foreign regulatory bodies also strictly enforce these and other regulatory requirements and drug marketing may be prohibited in whole or in part in other countries.

PharmAthene, its collaborators or its third party contract manufacturers may not be able to comply with the applicable regulations. After regulatory approvals are obtained, the subsequent discovery of previously unknown problems, or the failure to maintain compliance with existing or new regulatory requirements, may result in:

restrictions on the marketing or manufacturing of a product;
Warning Letters or Untitled Letters from the FDA asking PharmAthene, its collaborators or third party contractors to take or refrain from taking certain actions;
withdrawal of the product from the market;
FDA’s refusal to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications;
voluntary or mandatory product recall;
fines or disgorgement of profits or revenue;
suspension or withdrawal of regulatory approvals;
refusals to permit the import or export of products;
product seizure; and
injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties.

Other Regulations

In addition to the substantial regulations enforced by the FDA, PharmAthene is also subject to various federal, state and local laws, regulations and recommendations relating to safe working conditions, laboratory and manufacturing practices, the experimental use of animals, and the use and disposal of hazardous or potentially hazardous substances, including radioactive compounds and infectious disease agents, used in connection with PharmAthene’s various activities. PharmAthene cannot accurately predict the extent of government regulation that might result from any future legislation or administrative action.

Changing Legal and Regulatory Landscape

Periodically legislation is introduced in the U.S. Congress that could change the statutory provisions governing the approval, manufacturing and marketing of drugs, including biological products. In addition, FDA regulations and guidance are often revised or reinterpreted by the FDA in ways that may significantly affect PharmAthene’s business and products. PharmAthene cannot predict whether or when legislation impacting PharmAthene’s business will be enacted, what FDA regulations, guidance or interpretations may change, or what the impact of such changes, if any, may be in the future.

Process and Analytical Development, and Manufacturing

While PharmAthene has no drug substance or drug product development, analytical or manufacturing facilities of its own, it believes that acceptable alternatives are available through third-party contract manufacturing organizations, or CMOs, and contract research organizations, or CROs. CMOs have experience in developing biological manufacturing processes and operating under cGMPs established by the Code of Federal Regulations and the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (Biologics) regulated by the FDA, and PharmAthene relies on them for clinical and future commercial production of PharmAthene’s product candidates. CROs provide cGLP/cGMP-compliant services for product analytical tests.

For SparVax®, in June 2011 PharmAthene announced the successful completion of the technology transfer of the rPA bulk drug substance manufacturing to a new CMO, Diosynth. Subsequently in 2011 PharmAthene successfully completed a commercial scale 1,500 liter engineering run and a 1,500 liter cGMP run of SparVax® bulk drug substance at the Diosynth site. Formulation and filling of the final drug product,

159


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

adjuvanted rPA, are performed at Baxter Pharmaceutical Solutions LLC, located in the United States. The final dosage presentation is in unit dose syringes. All analytical data generated to date demonstrate that the bulk drug substance manufactured at Diosynth is comparable to bulk drug substance manufactured previously at Avecia in the UK, and in the 4th quarter 2012 FDA confirmed its concurrence that the bulk drug substances manufactured at the two sites are comparable.

For Valortim®, the cell culture and purification process was developed by BMS, and results in a commercially feasible and high purity product. PharmAthene has successfully manufactured bulk drug substance at large scale following technology transfer to a CMO, Laureate Biopharma. The final drug product has been formulated and filled, tested and released for use in clinical trials and non-clinical studies.

Certain raw materials used in producing PharmAthene’s product candidates are available from only one source or a limited number of sources. PharmAthene attempts to mitigate the risk associated with such sole source raw materials by actively managing PharmAthene’s inventories. PharmAthene has not experienced any shortages in supplies of such raw materials. Unavailability of certain materials or the loss of current sources of production could cause an interruption in production on a temporary basis pending establishment of new sources or, in some cases, implementation of alternative processes.

Intellectual Property

PharmAthene’s success depends in part on its ability to obtain patents, to protect trade secrets, and to operate without infringing upon the proprietary rights of others. PharmAthene seeks to protect PharmAthene’s proprietary position by, among other methods, filing U.S. and foreign patent applications related to the proprietary technology, inventions and improvements that are important to PharmAthene’s business.

The following table identifies each of PharmAthene’s issued and non-abandoned patents and published pending applications, in order of importance to PharmAthene:

       
Patent/Patent Application   Patent Number/ Application Number   Country of Issue/Filing   Issue Date/File Date   Expiration Date
Anthrax Vaccine
Formulation and Uses
Thereof
  GB2009/051293   WO   October 2, 2009   October 2, 2029
  12/998245   U.S.   October 2, 2009   October 2, 2029
  2011-529634   Japan   October 2, 2009   October 2, 2029
  9785720.5   Europe   October 2, 2009   October 2, 2029
  2,738,621   Canada   October 2, 2009   October 2, 2029
  2009299615   Australia   October 2, 2009   October 2, 2029
  212118   Israel   October 2, 2009   October 2, 2029
Recombinant
Butyrlcholinesterase &
Truncates thereof
  PCT/US10/03225   WO   December 21, 2010   December 21, 2030
  13/517,081   U.S.   December 21, 2010   December 21, 2030
  2012-545932   Japan   June 21, 2012   December 21, 2030
  10842361.7   Europe   December 21, 2010   December 21, 2030
  2,784,861   Canada   June 18, 2012   December 21, 2030
  2010340358   Australia   December 21, 2010   December 21, 2030
  220508   Israel   June 19, 2012   December 21, 2030
Method for Assaying
Antigens
  GB07/001353   WO   April 12, 2007   April 13, 2027
  12/226101   U.S.   October 7, 2008   April 13, 2027
  2010914   Europe   November 10, 2008   April 13, 2027
  2,648,850   Canada   October 9, 2008   April 13, 2027
  2007242647   Australia   October 24, 2008   April 13, 2027
  194459   Israel   November 1, 2012   April 13, 2027

160


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

       
Patent/Patent Application   Patent Number/ Application Number   Country of Issue/Filing   Issue Date/File Date   Expiration Date
Long Half-Life
Recombinant
Butyrylcholinesterase
  US07/017279   WO   August 2, 2007   August 3, 2027
  12/309909   U.S.   February 2, 2009   August 3, 2027
  2009-523781   Japan   February 4, 2009   August 3, 2027
  7811030.1   Europe   August 2, 2007   August 3, 2027
  2659809   Canada   February 3, 2009   August 3, 2027
  2007281998   Australia   February 10, 2009   August 3, 2027
  196,871   Israel   February 4, 2009   August 3, 2027

In addition, PharmAthene is a party to various exclusive and non-exclusive licenses, which provide access to intellectual property and know-how useful for PharmAthene’s products. PharmAthene is a party to license agreements with The Defence Science and Technology Laboratory of the United Kingdom Ministry of Defence, or DSTL, originally executed May 2006 and December 2006, and amended and restated in February 2009. These agreements allow for the licensing of certain patents and technology useful in PharmAthene’s rPA program. Upon commercialization of a product covered by a license, the license agreements require that PharmAthene makes royalty payments equal to a specified percentage of future sales of products for both government procurement and commercial markets. No royalty payments on these licenses have been incurred. Some of PharmAthene’s licenses, which generally extend for the life of any applicable patent, require PharmAthene to pay royalties on sales of products that may be derived from or produced using the licensed technology. PharmAthene derives rights to the patents, patent applications and know-how relating to Valortim® through PharmAthene’s collaboration arrangement with BMS, which owns such rights. For additional information on PharmAthene’s license agreements, please refer to Note 7 — Commitments and Contingencies — License Agreements in the Notes to PharmAthene’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

The expiration dates for the licenses described above are as follows:

 
License   Expiration Date
DSTL Anthrax   No expiration specified
Percivia   No expiration specified
BMS   Two years after the earlier of the date that (a) the collaboration product is no longer exploited under the agreement or (b) Unilateral Product (as defined in PharmAthene’s collaboration agreement with BMS) is no longer exploited under a unilateral development and commercialization agreement.

PharmAthene currently owns no material trademarks.

PharmAthene relies upon certain proprietary trade secrets, know-how and continuing technological advances to develop a competitive position. In efforts to maintain confidentiality and ownership of trade secrets, proprietary information and developments, all of PharmAthene’s employees are required to execute agreements regarding confidentiality and assigning to PharmAthene all rights to any inventions and processes they develop while they are employed by PharmAthene. PharmAthene intends to use license agreements to access external products and technologies, as well as to convey PharmAthene’s own intellectual property to others. PharmAthene will be able to protect its proprietary rights from unauthorized use by third parties only to the extent that PharmAthene’s proprietary rights are covered by valid and enforceable patents or are effectively maintained as trade secrets.

Competition

The pharmaceutical industry is characterized by rapidly evolving technology and intense competition. A large number of companies of all sizes engage in activities similar to PharmAthene’s activities and many of its competitors have substantially greater financial and other resources available to them.

161


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Anthrax Product Competition

With respect to the development of a recombinant PA-based vaccine, PharmAthene is aware of three other companies developing competing vaccines that are in the clinical stage of development: Emergent BioSolutions, Inc., which is the sole supplier to the U.S. government of the only currently FDA-licensed anthrax vaccine — BioThrax® Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed, Green Cross, and Panacea Biotec Ltd. There are a number of companies with anthrax vaccines in preclinical development including Bavarian Nordic, Dynavax, IBio, Immunovaccine, PaxVax, Vaxin, and Pfenex and there may be other companies developing competing vaccines that PharmAthene is not aware of.

Monoclonal antibodies, or mAbs, directed against PA are being developed for post-exposure prophylaxis and as symptomatic therapy for anthrax infection. There are a limited number of companies PharmAthene is aware of with anti-anthrax mAbs and/or polyclonal antibodies in development, including: Cangene Corporation, GlaxoSmithKline plc., Elusys Therapeutics, Inc., Emergent BioSolutions, Inc., and IQ Corporation BV.

There are a number of orally available small molecule and other drugs approved and/or under development for the treatment of anthrax. These include broad spectrum antibiotics as well as anthrax specific products. Bayer AG produces ciprofloxacin, or Cipro®, which has been approved for the post-exposure prophylaxis of inhalational anthrax. In late 2004, generic versions of Cipro® were also approved by the FDA. In addition, levofloxacin, an antibiotic marketed in the United States by Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceuticals, and the generic antibiotic, doxycycline, are both approved for post-exposure prophylaxis of inhalational anthrax. There may be other companies developing competing therapies that PharmAthene is not aware of.

Nerve Agent Product Competition

PharmAthene is aware of antidotes to nerve agents being developed by pharmaceutical companies, including Countervail Corporation, Meridian Medical Technologies, a subsidiary of Pfizer, Inc., Protalix BioTherapeutics, Inc. and Dynport Vaccine Company, LLC, in collaboration with Baxter Healthcare Corporation.

U.S. Government Contracts

For the foreseeable future, PharmAthene believes its main customer will continue to be national governments, primarily the U.S. government. Substantially all of PharmAthene’s revenues to date have been derived from grants and U.S. government contracts. There can be no assurances that existing government contracts will be renewed or that it can enter into new contracts or receive new grants to supply the U.S. or other governments with PharmAthene’s products. The process of obtaining government contracts is lengthy and uncertain.

U.S. government contracts typically contain unilateral termination provisions for the government and are subject to audit and modification by the government at its sole discretion, which will subject PharmAthene to additional risks. These risks include the ability of the U.S. government unilaterally to:

suspend or prevent PharmAthene for a set period of time from receiving new contracts or extending existing contracts based on violations or suspected violations of laws or regulations;
terminate PharmAthene’s contracts, including if funds become unavailable or are not provided to the applicable governmental agency;
reduce the scope and value of PharmAthene’s contracts and/or revise the timing for work to be performed;
audit and object to PharmAthene’s contract-related costs and fees, including allocated indirect costs;
control and potentially prohibit the export of PharmAthene’s products;
claim rights to products, including intellectual property, developed under the contract;
change certain terms and conditions in PharmAthene’s contracts; and
cancel outstanding RFP solicitations (as was the case with RFP-BARDA-08-15) or BAAs.

162


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The U.S. government will be able to terminate any of its contracts with PharmAthene either for its convenience or if it defaults by failing to perform in accordance with the contract schedule and terms. Termination-for- convenience provisions generally enable PharmAthene to recover only its costs incurred or committed, settlement expenses, and profit on the work completed prior to termination. Termination-for-default provisions do not permit these recoveries and would make PharmAthene liable for excess costs incurred by the U.S. government in procuring undelivered items from another source.

Employees

As of June 30, 2013, PharmAthene employed 52 persons on a full-time basis, including 35 individuals engaged in research and development activities and 17 individuals engaged in general and administrative functions, such as human resources, finance, accounting, legal and investor relations. At that date, PharmAthene’s staff included 11 employees with Ph.D. degrees. None of PharmAthene’s employees are party to any collective bargaining agreement, and PharmAthene believes that its relationship with its employees is good.

Information concerning PharmAthene’s directors and executive officers can be found in the section entitled “MANAGEMENT OF THE COMBINED COMPANY” and “QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT THE MARKET RISK OF PHARMATHENE.”

Financial Information by Geographic Area

For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 all revenues from external customers were attributed to United States customers. PharmAthene’s country of domicile is the United States. As of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 all long-lived assets, with a net book value, were located in the United States. PharmAthene Canada’s long-lived assets were reclassified as assets held for sale as of December 31, 2010. Canadian long-lived assets had a net book value on January 1, 2010 of approximately $5.9 million.

Research and Development

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, PharmAthene spent approximately $19.5 million, $21.2 million and $20.9 million on research and development activities, respectively.

Properties

PharmAthene’s principal executive offices are located at One Park Place, Annapolis, MD 21401 and are comprised of approximately 21,900 square feet. The lease expires in 2017. PharmAthene has also leased approximately 2,300 square feet of office space in Durham, North Carolina. This lease expires on September 30, 2013.

Management believes that these facilities are suitable and adequate to meet PharmAthene’s anticipated needs.

Legal Proceedings

Except as noted below, PharmAthene is not a party to any material legal proceedings.

In December 2006, PharmAthene filed a complaint against SIGA in the Delaware Court of Chancery. The complaint alleged, among other things, that PharmAthene has the right to license exclusively development and marketing rights for SIGA’s drug candidate, ArestvyrTM (Tecovirimat), pursuant to a Merger Agreement between the parties that was terminated in 2006. The complaint also alleged that SIGA failed to negotiate in good faith the terms of such a license pursuant to the terminated merger agreement with SIGA.

In September 2011, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued an opinion in the case finding that SIGA had breached certain contractual obligations to PharmAthene and upholding PharmAthene’s claims of promissory estoppel. The Delaware Court of Chancery awarded PharmAthene the right to receive 50% of all net profits (as defined in the court’s final judgment) related to the sale of ArestvyrTM (formerly known as ST-246®) and related products for 10 years following initial commercial sale of the drug once SIGA earns $40.0 million in net profits from the sale of ArestvyrTM and related products. The Delaware Court of Chancery also awarded PharmAthene a portion of its attorney's fees and expert witness and other costs. In May 2012, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued its final judgment. SIGA appealed aspects of the decision to the Delaware Supreme Court. In response, PharmAthene cross-appealed other aspects of the decision.

163


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In May 2013, the Delaware Supreme Court issued its ruling on the appeal, affirming the Delaware Court of Chancery’s finding of breach of contract, reversing its finding of promissory estoppel, and remanding the case back to the Delaware Court of Chancery to reconsider the remedy and award of attorney's fees and expert witness and other costs in light of the Delaware Supreme Court’s opinion.

There can be no assurance that the Delaware Court of Chancery will re-instate its prior remedy or order another remedy for PharmAthene, that SIGA will not appeal any subsequent decision by the Delaware Court of Chancery, or that SIGA will not be successful in any subsequent appeal.

164


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with PharmAthene’s audited and unaudited consolidated financial statements, and other relevant statistical data, which appear in this proxy statement/prospectus/ consent solicitation. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation, including information with respect to PharmAthene’s plans and strategy for its business and related financing, includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You should review the sections entitled “CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS” and “RISK FACTORS” of this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis.

Overview

PharmAthene is a biodefense company engaged in the development and commercialization of next generation medical countermeasures against biological and chemical threats. Its current biodefense portfolio includes the following product candidates:

SparVax®, a next generation recombinant protective antigen, or rPA, anthrax vaccine;
rBChE (recombinant butyrylcholinesterase) bioscavanger, a medical countermeasure for nerve agent poisoning by organophosphorous compounds, including nerve gases and pesticides, and
Valortim®, a fully human monoclonal antibody for the prevention and treatment of anthrax infection.

In May 2013 the FDA lifted the clinical hold it had placed on SparVax® in August 2012. PharmAthene is now in discussions with BARDA regarding the commencement of its planned Phase II clinical trial for that product candidate.

In addition, in May 2013 the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed a September 2011 ruling of the Delaware Court of Chancery that SIGA had breached certain contractual obligations to PharmAthene. The matter is on remand to the Delaware Court of Chancery to determine a remedy in light of the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision. Previously the Delaware Court of Chancery had awarded PharmAthene the right to receive 50% of all net profits (as defined in the court’s final judgment) related to the sale of SIGA’s ArestvyrTM (formerly known as ST-246®) and related products for 10 years following initial commercial sale of the drug once SIGA earns $40.0 million in net profits from the sales of ArestvyrTM and related products and a portion of PharmAthene’s attorney’s fees and expert witness and other costs. There can be no assurance that the Delaware Court of Chancery will re-instate its prior remedy or order another remedy for PharmAthene, that SIGA will not appeal any subsequent decision by the Delaware Court of Chancery, or that SIGA will not be successful in any subsequent appeal.

Critical Accounting Policies

A summary of PharmAthene’s critical accounting policies, including those that require the use of significant estimates and judgment, follows. A more comprehensive description of all of PharmAthene’s significant accounting policies is contained in Note 2 to its consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

PharmAthene generates its revenue from different types of contractual arrangements: cost-plus-fee contracts, cost reimbursable grants and fixed price contracts.

Revenues on cost-plus-fee contracts are recognized in an amount equal to the costs incurred during the period plus an estimate of the applicable fee earned. The estimate of the applicable fee earned is determined by reference to the contract: if the contract defines the fee in terms of risk-based milestones and specifies the fees to be earned upon the completion of each milestone, then the fee is recognized when the related milestones are earned, as further described below; otherwise, PharmAthene estimates the fee earned in a given period by using a proportional performance method based on costs incurred during the period as compared to total estimated project costs and application of the resulting fraction to the total project fee specified in the contract.

165


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

When PharmAthene uses the milestone method of revenue recognition, milestone payments (including milestone payments for fees) contained in research and development arrangements are recognized as revenue when: (i) the milestones are achieved; (ii) no further performance obligations with respect to the milestone exist; (iii) collection is reasonably assured; and (iv) substantive effort was necessary to achieve the milestone.

Milestones are considered substantive if all of the following conditions are met:

it is commensurate with either PharmAthene’s performance to meet the milestone or the enhancement of the value of the delivered item or items as a result of a specific outcome resulting from PharmAthene’s performance to achieve the milestone,
it relates solely to past performance,
the value of the milestone is reasonable relative to all the deliverables and payment terms (including other potential milestone consideration) within the arrangement.

If a milestone is deemed not to be substantive, PharmAthene recognizes the portion of the milestone payment as revenue that correlates to work already performed; the remaining portion of the milestone payment is deferred and recognized as revenue as PharmAthene completes its performance obligations.

Revenue on fixed price contracts (without substantive milestones as described above) is recognized on the percentage-of-completion method. The percentage-of-completion method recognizes income as the contract progresses (generally related to the costs incurred in providing the services required under the contract). The use of the percentage-of-completion method depends on the ability to make reasonable dependable estimates and the fact that circumstances may necessitate frequent revision of estimates does not indicate that the estimates are unreliable for the purpose for which they are used.

As a result of PharmAthene’s revenue recognition policies and the billing provisions contained in PharmAthene’s contracts, the timing of customer billings may differ from the timing of recognizing revenue. Amounts invoiced to customers in excess of revenue recognized are reflected on the balance sheet as deferred revenue. PharmAthene recorded approximately $1.4 million and $0.5 million as deferred revenue as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Amounts recognized as revenue in excess of amounts billed to customers are reflected on the balance sheet as unbilled accounts receivable.

PharmAthene analyzes each cost reimbursable grant to determine whether PharmAthene should report such reimbursements as revenue or as an offset to PharmAthene’s expenses incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, it recorded approximately $1.1 million, $0.7 million and $2.9 million, respectively, of costs reimbursed by the government as an offset to research and development expenses. Included in the 2010 grants was approximately $0.9 million in therapeutic discovery tax grants which was offset against research and development expense in 2010.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred; advance payments are deferred and expensed as performance occurs. Research and development costs include salaries, facilities expense, overhead expenses, material and supplies, preclinical expense, clinical trials and related clinical manufacturing expenses, share-based compensation expense, contract services and other outside services.

Share-Based Payments

PharmAthene has a long-term incentive compensation plan, or LTIP, under which options to purchase shares of PharmAthene’s common stock may be granted to employees, consultants and directors at a price no less than the quoted market value on the date of grant. The LTIP also provides for awards in the form of stock appreciation rights, restricted or unrestricted stock awards, stock-equivalent units or performance-based stock awards.

PharmAthene accounts for share-based awards to employees and non-employee directors at fair value. The amount of compensation expense recognized using the fair value method requires PharmAthene to exercise judgment and make assumptions relating to the factors that determine the fair value of PharmAthene’s stock option grants. PharmAthene uses the Black-Scholes model to estimate the fair value of

166


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PharmAthene’s option grants. The fair value calculated by this model is a function of several factors, including grant price, the risk-free interest rate, the expected term of the option and the anticipated volatility of the option.

Intangible Assets and Goodwill

PharmAthene continually assesses the realizability and recoverability of its intangible assets and goodwill. These assessments contain substantial judgment in determining the fair value of such assets and with respect to future usage of the assets and potential cash flows associated with them.

Financial Instruments

PharmAthene’s financial instruments, and/or embedded features contained in those instruments, often are classified as derivative liabilities and are recorded at their fair values. The determination of fair value of these instrument and features requires estimates and judgments. Some of PharmAthene’s stock purchase warrants are considered to be derivative liabilities due to the presence of net settlement features; the fair value of PharmAthene’s warrants is determined based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Use of the Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires the use of unobservable inputs such as the expected term, anticipated volatility and expected dividends.

Results of Operations

Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 Compared to Three and Six Month Ended June 30, 2012

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, there were no significant changes in critical accounting policies from those at December 31, 2012.

Revenue

PharmAthene recognized revenue of $4.3 million and $6.3 million during the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. PharmAthene recognized revenue of $10.8 million and $12.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

     
  Three months ended June 30,
Revenue ($ in millions)   2013   2012   % Change
SparVax®   $ 3.5     $ 6.1       (42.6 )% 
rBChE bioscavanger     0.8       0.2       300.0 % 
Valortim®                 % 
Total Revenue   $ 4.3     $ 6.3       (31.7 )% 

     
  Six months ended June 30,
Revenue ($ in millions)   2013   2012   % Change
SparVax®   $ 8.6     $ 11.3       (23.9 )% 
rBChE bioscavanger     2.2       1.1       100.0 % 
Valortim®           0.1       (100.0 )% 
Total Revenue   $ 10.8     $ 12.5       (13.6 )% 

PharmAthene’s revenue was derived primarily from contracts with the U.S. government for the development of SparVax® and PharmAthene’s rBChE bioscavanger. PharmAthene’s revenue in the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 changed from the comparable periods of 2012 primarily due to the following:

Under its contract for the development of SparVax®, PharmAthene recognized approximately $3.5 million and $6.1 million of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and approximately $8.6 million and $11.3 million of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 revenue was primarily attributable to ongoing stability testing of PharmAthene’s Bulk Drug Substance (BDS) and Final Drug Product (FDP), BDS process characterization studies, a non-clinical rabbit dose ranging efficacy study and continued immunopotency assay development which included qualification and acceptance by the FDA. Milestone revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2013

167


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

was $0.07 million (no milestone revenue was recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2013). During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 revenue for the SparVax® program was primarily attributable to the initiation of BDS process characterization to prepare for validation activities, further progression in the development of bioanalytical and analytical assays and the achievement of several contract milestones. Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was also attributable to work related to the manufacture of SparVax® FDP as well as activities related to the Phase II clinical trial that had been anticipated to commence later in 2012 but was suspended following the FDA’s clinical hold in August 2012 and the completion of certain activities related to the development of analytical assays and ongoing stability programs for BDS and FDP. Milestone revenue received for the achievement of key technical milestones for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 was $0.4 million and $1.3 million, respectively. The decrease in revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012 is due to the decrease in milestone revenue, the completion of the majority of on-site work at PharmAthene’s subcontractor’s manufacturing facility, the postponement of certain assay validation work as a result of the FDA’s clinical hold imposed in August 2012, as well as reduced activity relating to the potency assay, as PharmAthene replaced the assay it had been using with an improved assay, work on which will take place in future periods. With the lifting of the FDA’s clinical hold in May 2013 on SparVax®, PharmAthene anticipates recognizing revenue starting later this year with respect to a planned Phase II clinical trial for that product candidate. However, PharmAthene anticipates that SparVax® revenues will remain lower in the second half of 2013 than they were for the corresponding period during 2012.
Under its contract for PharmAthene’s second generation rBChE bioscavanger, PharmAthene recognized approximately $0.8 million and $0.2 million of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and approximately $2.2 million and $1.1 million of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. In the first three and six months of 2012 PharmAthene’s activities related to clone generation and initiation of process development, while in the comparable 2013 periods PharmAthene continued with the process development work and focused on material generation and initiated non-clinical studies.

Research and Development Expenses

PharmAthene’s research and development expenses were $3.4 million and $4.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Its research and development expenses were $8.6 million and $9.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These expenses resulted from research and development activities in all periods related primarily to PharmAthene’s SparVax® and rBChE bioscavanger programs. Direct expenses included salaries and other costs of personnel, raw materials and supplies, and an allocation of indirect expenses. PharmAthene also incurred third-party costs, such as contract research, consulting and clinical development costs for individual projects. Research and development expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2013, were net of the receipt of approximately $0.5 million, the result of the settlement of a lawsuit filed against a vendor. Research and development expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2012 were net of cost reimbursements under certain of PharmAthene’s government grants of $0.4 million. For the three months ended June 30, 2013, no cost reimbursements by the government were recorded as an offset to research and development expenses. Research and development expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were net of cost reimbursements under certain of PharmAthene’s government grants of $0.02 million and $1.0 million, respectively.

168


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Research and development expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were attributable to research programs as follows:

     
  Three Months ended June 30,
Research and Development Expenses ($ in millions)   2013   2012   % Change
SparVax® and Valortim®   $ 3.3     $ 4.6       (28.3 )% 
rBChE bioscavenger     0.6       0.3       100.0 % 
Internal research and development     (0.5 )            % 
Total research and development expenses   $ 3.4     $ 4.9       (30.6 )% 

     
  Six Months ended June 30,
Research and Development Expenses ($ in millions)   2013   2012   % Change
SparVax® and Valortim®   $ 7.7     $ 8.8       (12.5 )% 
rBChE bioscavenger     1.4       0.7       100.0 % 
Internal research and development     (0.5 )      0.1       (600.0 )% 
Total research and development expenses   $ 8.6     $ 9.6       (10.4 )% 

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, research and development expenses decreased $1.5 million and $1.0 million, respectively from the same periods in the prior year, primarily due to (i) the receipt in the 2013 period of approximately $0.5 million, the result of the settlement of a lawsuit filed against a vendor and (ii) decreased costs related to PharmAthene’s SparVax® program as a result of the fact that ongoing process characterization studies and non-clinical studies were nearing completion, the postponement of certain assay validation work, and reduced activity relating to the potency assay, as PharmAthene replaced the assay it had been using with an improved assay, work on which will take place in future periods. These reductions in cost were partially offset by increased costs in PharmAthene’s rBChE bioscavanger program. With the lifting of the FDA’s clinical hold in May 2013 on SparVax®, PharmAthene anticipates incurring costs starting later this year with respect to a planned Phase II clinical trial for that product candidate.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative functions include executive management, finance and administration, government affairs and regulations, corporate development, human resources, legal, and compliance. For each function, PharmAthene may incur expenses such as salaries, supplies and third-party consulting and other external costs and non-cash expenditures such as expense related to stock option and restricted share awards. An allocation of indirect costs such as facilities, utilities and other administrative overhead is also included in general and administrative expenses.

Expenses associated with general and administrative functions were $2.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and $2.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The $0.5 million dollar decrease from the same period in the prior year, was principally due to reduced labor and associated share-based compensation costs and reduced professional and consulting and legal fees.

Expenses associated with general and administrative functions were $4.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and $5.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The $1.1 million dollar decrease from the same period in the prior year was principally due to reduced labor and associated share-based compensation costs and reduced professional and consulting and legal fees.

Depreciation

Depreciation expense was $41,854 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and $76,448 for the three months ended June 30, 2012. Depreciation expense was $94,456 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and $162,358 for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

Other Income (Expense)

Other income (expense) primarily consists of income on PharmAthene’s cash and investments, interest expense on PharmAthene’s debt and other financial obligations, changes in the fair value of PharmAthene’s derivative financial instruments, foreign currency transaction gains or losses, and the gain on the disposal of property and equipment.

169


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Other income was $256,563 for the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $717,794 in the comparable period in 2012, a decrease of $461,231. The decrease was primarily the result of a $470,985 decrease in unrealized gains related to the changes in fair value of PharmAthene’s derivative instruments.

Other expense was $754,345 in the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $220,993 in the comparable period in 2012, an increase of $533,352. The increase was primarily the result of (i) a $385,100 increase in unrealized losses related to the changes in fair value of PharmAthene’s derivative instruments (ii) $85,437 of additional interest expense in 2013 generated from its loans with GE Capital, and (iii) $66,626 gain in 2012 on the disposal of property and equipment.

Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes was $11,206 and $16,133 during the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The provision for income taxes was $20,949 and $166,538 during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. PharmAthene’s provision for income taxes results from the difference between the treatment of goodwill for income tax purposes and for U.S. GAAP.

Year Ended December 31, 2012 Compared to December 31, 2011

Revenue

PharmAthene recognized revenue of $25.2 million and $24.3 million during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. PharmAthene’s revenue in 2012 was derived from contracts with the U.S. government for the development of its product candidates.

     
  Year ended December 31,
Revenue ($ in millions)   2012   2011   % Change
SparVax   $ 22.9     $ 19.3       18.7 % 
rBChE – AES     1.8       0.7       157.1 % 
rBChE – Protexia           0.6       (100.0 )% 
Valortim     0.5       3.7       (86.5 )% 
Total Revenue   $ 25.2     $ 24.3       3.7 % 

PharmAthene’s revenue changed in 2012 from 2011 primarily due to the following:

Under PharmAthene’s contract for the development of SparVax®, it recognized approximately $22.9 million of revenue in 2012, an increase of $3.6 million (or 18.7%) from 2011. During 2012, revenue for PharmAthene’s SparVax® program was primarily attributable to completion of Final Drug Product (FDP) manufacture, the initiation of Bulk Drug Substance (BDS) Process Characterization, progression in the development of bioanalytical and analytical assays, the execution of non-clinical activities and the achievement of several contract milestones. During 2011, revenue was primarily attributable to activities related to the manufacturing platform for SparVax® and additional work performed to develop and qualify analytical and stability-indicating assays for characterization of the product. Milestone revenue for the achievement of key technical milestones was approximately $2.2 million and $3.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

In August 2012, PharmAthene received notification from the FDA that its SparVax® rPA anthrax vaccine program was placed on clinical hold. The FDA has requested additional stability data and information related to the stability indicating assays. PharmAthene provided supporting data and information to the FDA and engaged in discussions with that agency as well as PharmAthene’s customer, BARDA, regarding the clinical hold. In May 2013 the FDA lifted the clinical hold. PharmAthene is currently in discussions with BARDA regarding obtaining additional funding and consent for a planned the planned Phase II human clinical trial with SparVax®, which it hopes to commence in the fourth quarter of 2013. As a result of the clinical hold, revenues for the first six months of 2013 under PharmAthene’s SparVax® contract did not include those it otherwise would have generated had PharmAthene been able to commence the clinical trial and undertake other activities.

Under PharmAthene’s contract with the DoD for the development of an advanced expression system (AES) for rBChE, its second generation rBChE bioscavanger, PharmAthene recognized approximately

170


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

$1.8 million, representing an increase of approximately $1.1 million (or 157.1%) from 2011. Significant technical progress was made in the development of PharmAthene’s second generation rBChE bioscavanger in 2012, including the establishment of final clones, genetic stability and fed batch evaluation to establish the bioreactor conditions for manufacturing. On July 31, 2012, the DoD exercised a $2.5 million option to continue to fund work under this contract in 2013.

Under its NIAID contracts for the advanced development of Valortim®, PharmAthene recognized $0.5 million of revenue in 2012, a substantial decrease of $3.2 million (or 86.5%) from 2011 levels as a result of PharmAthene’s 2007 contract with NIAID for Valortim® ending (in accordance with its terms) in the first quarter 2012. Additional government funding has not been awarded for Valortim®. There can be no assurance PharmAthene will be successful in obtaining additional financial support for this program.

Research and Development Expenses

PharmAthene’s research and development expenses were $19.5 million and $21.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. These expenses resulted from research and development activities related to SparVax®, rBChE bioscavanger and Valortim®. Research and development expenses include direct expenses (salaries and other costs of personnel, raw materials and supplies, contract research, consulting and clinical development costs) and an allocation of indirect expenses.

Research and development expenses for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were attributable to research programs as follows:

     
  Year ended December 31,
($ in millions)   2012   2011   % Change
Anthrax therapeutic and vaccines   $ 18.3     $ 18.8       (2.7 )% 
Chemical nerve agent bioscavenger     1.1       0.6       83.3 % 
Internal research and development     0.1       1.8       (94.4 )% 
Total research and development expenses   $ 19.5     $ 21.2       (8.0 )% 

Research and development expenses for both 2012 and 2011 were net of cost reimbursements under certain of PharmAthene’s government grants of $1.1 million and $0.7 million, respectively.

In 2012, research and development expenses decreased approximately $1.7 million from 2011, primarily due to a reduction in (i) indirect operating expenses including overhead and internal research and development, and (ii) direct costs related to PharmAthene’s Valortim® program as a result of the completion in the first quarter of 2012 of work under PharmAthene’s 2007 contract with NIAID, offset by higher direct SparVax® program expenses. As a result of the FDA clinical hold related to SparVax®, costs it recognized in the first six months of 2013 under PharmAthene’s SparVax® contract did not include those PharmAthene would have incurred had it been able to commence the clinical trial and undertake other activities.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative functions include executive management, finance and administration, government affairs and regulations, corporate development, human resources, legal, and compliance. For each function, PharmAthene may incur expenses such as salaries, supplies and third-party consulting and other external costs and non-cash expenditures such as expense related to stock option and restricted share awards. An allocation of indirect costs such as facilities, utilities and other administrative overhead is also included in general and administrative expenses.

Expenses associated with general and administrative functions were $11.6 million for 2012 and $14.3 million for 2011, an approximate 19% decrease. The decrease in general and administrative expenses from 2011 to 2012 was largely due to (i) a $2.3 million reduction in legal and professional expenses primarily related to the SIGA litigation and trial activities and (ii) a planned reduction in headcount, offset in part by a $1.4 million insurance recovery that was received in 2011.

Depreciation Expense

Depreciation expenses were approximately $0.3 million and $0.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The decrease was related to previously purchased assets being fully depreciated during the year ended December 31, 2012.

171


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Other Income (Expense)

Other income in 2012 was $1.5 million, compared to $7.9 million in 2011, a decrease of $6.4 million. The decrease was primarily the result of (i) a $6.5 million difference in gains related to the changes in fair value of PharmAthene’s derivative instruments, (ii) a $0.8 million gain in 2011 from the sale of Canadian assets held for sale, and (iii) approximately $0.3 million of additional interest expense in 2012 generated from PharmAthene’s loans with GE Capital, offset by $1.2 million of income related to the realization of the cumulative translation adjustment upon the substantial liquidation of PharmAthene Canada, Inc. in July 2012.

Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes was approximately $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to no provision in 2011. The provision for income taxes in 2012 resulted from the difference between the treatment of goodwill for income tax purposes and for U.S. GAAP.

Year Ended December 31, 2011 Compared to December 31, 2010

Revenue

PharmAthene recognized revenue of $24.3 million and $21.0 million during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Its revenue was derived primarily from contracts with the U.S. government for the development of PharmAthene’s product candidates.

     
  Year ended December 31,
Revenue ($ in millions)   2011   2010   % Change
SparVax   $ 19.3     $ 11.7       65.0 % 
rBChE – AES     0.7             100.0 % 
rBChE – Protexia     0.6       5.8       (89.7 )% 
Valortim     3.7       3.0       23.3 % 
Other           0.5       (100.0 )% 
Total Revenue   $ 24.3     $ 21.0       15.7 % 

PharmAthene’s revenue for the year ended December 31, 2011 changed from 2010 primarily due to the following:

Under PharmAthene’s contract for the development of SparVax®, it recognized approximately $19.3 million in 2011, an increase of 65.0% from 2010 levels. The increase in revenue for the SparVax® program during 2011 is attributable to additional work in preparation and execution of the scale up campaign at PharmAthene’s U.S.-based SparVax® bulk drug substance manufacturer as well as an increase in PharmAthene’s billing rate under the contract. Additional activities related to the establishment of analytical and stability-indicating assays for characterization of the product. Of the revenue amounts set forth above, $3.5 million in 2011 and $1.8 million in 2010 represent substantive milestone payments that were tied to PharmAthene’s successful achievement of certain technical activities.

Under the September 2007 contract for the advanced development of Valortim®, PharmAthene recognized approximately $3.7 million in 2011 a 23.3% increase from 2011 levels. Revenue in 2011 reflects both clinical and non clinical work following the release of the FDA partial clinical hold in December 2010. Final patient dosing in clinical trial was completed in April 2011 and the in-life portion of the trial ended in the third quarter 2011. Revenue in 2010 was largely attributable to reimbursement of costs related to clinical and non-clinical studies, including work in connection with the investigation related to the partial clinical hold and certain manufacturing-related activities.

Under the September 2006 contract for the advanced development of Protexia®, PharmAthene recognized approximately $5.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2010, of which $0.7 million in 2010 represent substantive milestone payments that were tied to PharmAthene’s successful achievement of certain technical activities. The decline in revenue is attributed to completion of major development activities for this program in past years. In 2011, PharmAthene generated additional revenue of $0.7 million under the fixed price contract with the DoD for the development of the AES for rBChE, PharmAthene’s nerve agent medical countermeasure, which was awarded in August 2011.

172


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Research and Development Expenses

PharmAthene’s research and development expenses were approximately $21.2 million and $20.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Research and development expenses for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were attributable to research programs as follows:

     
  Year ended December 31,
($ in millions)   2011   2010   % Change
Anthrax therapeutic and vaccines   $ 18.8     $ 15.2       23.7 % 
Chemical nerve agent protectants     0.6       4.7       (87.2 )% 
Recombinant dual antigen plague vaccine           0.1       (100.0 )% 
Internal research and development     1.8       0.9       100.0 % 
Total research and development expenses   $ 21.2     $ 20.9       1.4 % 

For the year ended December 31, 2011, research and development expenses increased $0.3 million from the prior year. This change was primarily due to the increased technical activity and the achievement of key technical milestones on PharmAthene’s SparVax® program and the completion of the Phase I Valortim® dose escalation clinical trial partially offset by a decrease in development expenses related to the clinical nerve agent protectants program as a result of the December 31, 2010 shut down of the Protexia® program.

Research and development expenses for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were net of cost reimbursements under certain of PharmAthene’s government grants of $0.7 million and $2.9 million, respectively. Included in the 2010 grants were $0.9 million in therapeutic discovery tax grants.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses were approximately $14.3 million and $18.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in 2011 primarily resulted from a $3.0 million reduction in bad debt expense and a property loss insurance recovery of $1.4 million in 2011, partially offset by an increase in non-cash stock compensation expenses as well as taxes and other expenses. The bad debt expenses in 2010 consisted primarily of provisions associated with an invoice to PharmAthene’s U.S. government customer for the work at Avecia as well as the wind down of the third generation anthrax vaccine program.

Depreciation and Intangible Amortization (including impairment charges)

Depreciation and amortization expenses were approximately $0.5 million and $5.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in 2011 is primarily a result of the impairment charge taken in December 2010 of approximately $4.6 million with the closing of PharmAthene’s Canadian operations.

Other Income (Expense)

Other income (expense) in 2011 was a net income of $7.9 million, compared to a net expense of $11.3 million in 2010. Most of the change was due to (i) a significant reduction in interest expense of $5.9 million resulting from the conversion of PharmAthene’s convertible notes in the fourth quarter of 2010, (ii) a significant change in the fair value of PharmAthene’s derivatives instruments (a $5.5 million loss in 2010 compared to a $7.1 million gain in 2011) primarily as a result of the change in PharmAthene’s stock price, and (iii) a $0.8 million gain on the sale of Canadian assets held for sale in 2011.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

In addition to monies paid under PharmAthene’s development contract for SparVax®, PharmAthene’s primary source of cash during the second quarter and first half of 2013 was provided from proceeds raised as a result of sales of shares of PharmAthene’s common stock under the controlled equity offering arrangement, which PharmAthene commenced at the end of March 2013. PharmAthene’s primary source of funding in 2012 were monies paid under PharmAthene’s development contract for SparVax®. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, PharmAthene is currently prohibited from using PharmAthene’s controlled equity offering arrangement.

173


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PharmAthene’s future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including, the progress of PharmAthene’s research and development programs; the progress of preclinical and clinical testing; the time and cost involved in obtaining regulatory approval; the cost of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent claims and other intellectual property rights; changes in PharmAthene’s existing research relationships; competing technological and marketing developments; PharmAthene’s ability to establish collaborative arrangements and to enter into licensing agreements and contractual arrangements with others; and any future change in PharmAthene’s business strategy, including the proposed merger with Theraclone. If the proposed merger is not completed, PharmAthene will reevaluate its strategic alternatives. PharmAthene’s cash requirements could change materially as a result of shifts in PharmAthene’s business and strategy. The need to raise additional capital will depend on many factors, including but not limited to, the completion of the proposed merger, PharmAthene’s future cash requirements, future contract funding, the ongoing proceedings in PharmAthene’s litigation with SIGA, the timing, amount, and profitability of sales of ArestvyrTM, if any (including potentially the timing of SIGA’s recognition of revenue related thereto) in the event the trial court awards PharmAthene a remedy tied to sales or profits of that product, and PharmAthene’s ability to collect monies from SIGA in the event the trial court awards PharmAthene a remedy tied to sales or profits of ArestvyrTM.

Historically, PharmAthene has not generated positive cash flows from operations. To bridge the gap between payments made to PharmAthene under PharmAthene’s U.S. government contracts and grants and PharmAthene’s operating and capital needs, PharmAthene has had to rely on a variety of financing sources, including the issuance of equity and equity-linked securities and proceeds from loans and other borrowings. On March 25, 2013, PharmAthene entered into a controlled equity offering arrangement pursuant to which it may offer and sell, from time to time, through a sales agent, shares of PharmAthene’s common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $15.0 million. As of June 30, 2013, aggregate gross sales for additional common stock of approximately $10.4 million remained available under the arrangement. Please see “— Financing Activities” below. For the foreseeable future, PharmAthene will continue to need these types of financing vehicles and potentially others to help fund PharmAthene’s future operating and capital requirements; however, under the terms of the Merger Agreement with Theraclone, PharmAthene is currently prohibited from using the arrangement.

Due to the current economic environment, the U.S. government may be forced or choose to reduce or delay spending in the biodefense field, which could decrease the likelihood of future government contract awards, the likelihood that the government will exercise its right to extend any of its existing contracts with PharmAthene and/or the likelihood that the government would procure products from PharmAthene.

PharmAthene’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a basis which assumes that it will continue as a going concern and which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business and do not include any adjustments that might result if the carrying amount of recorded assets and liabilities are not realized.

Cash Flows

The following table provides information regarding PharmAthene’s cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

   
  Six months ended June 30,
     2013   2012
Net cash provided by (used in):
                 
Operating activities   $ (234,987 )    $ (1,912,379 ) 
Investing activities     (70,581 )      67,400  
Financing activities     3,398,040       2,389,563  
Effects of exchange rates on cash     (4,080 )      (4,434 ) 
Total increase (decrease) in net cash   $ 3,088,392     $ 540,150  

174


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table provides information regarding PharmAthene’s cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

     
  Year ended December 31,
     2012   2011   2010
Net cash provided by (used in):
                          
Operating activities   $ (2,322,906 )    $ (7,808,553 )    $ (14,864,577 ) 
Investing activities     67,400       1,687,521       2,756,007  
Financing activities     3,720,071       5,781,328       21,460,452  
Effects of exchange rates on cash     181       (208,852 )      (240,122 ) 
Total increase (decrease) in net cash   $ 1,464,746     $ (548,556 )    $ 9,111,760  

Sources and Uses of Cash

Cash and cash equivalents were $15.8 million and $12.7 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Cash and cash equivalents were $12.7 million, $11.2 million and $11.8 million at December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The $1.5 million increase at December 31, 2012 compared to December 31, 2011 was primarily attributable to the $2.5 million term loan, which PharmAthene closed in the first quarter 2012, and the $1.3 million borrowed under the revolving line of credit, partially offset by $2.3 million of cash used in operations. The $0.6 million decrease at December 31, 2011 as compared to December 31, 2010 was primarily due to the receipt of net proceeds of $5.8 million from a registered direct public offering of common stock and warrants, as well as $1.8 million related to the sale of assets in Canada, offset by $7.8 million of cash used in operations.

Operating Activities

Net cash used by operating activities was $0.2 million and $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Net cash used by operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2013 reflects PharmAthene’s net loss of $3.3 million, adjusted for $0.7 million for non-cash share-based compensation expense, $0.6 million for the increase in the fair value of derivative instruments and $0.2 million for other non-cash expenses. A decrease in receivables (billed and unbilled) of $1.3 million and an increase in accounts payable of $1.3 million was partially offset by a decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities of $0.4 million and deferred revenue of $0.9 million. The increase in the fair value of the derivative instruments primarily relates to the change in PharmAthene’s stock price from December 31, 2012 to June 28, 2013.

Net cash used in operations during the six months ended June 30, 2012 reflects PharmAthene’s net loss of $3.4 million, adjusted for non-cash share-based compensation expense of $1.1 million, the increase in the fair value of derivative instruments of $0.2 million and other noncash expenses of $0.3 million. The increase in unbilled accounts receivable of approximately $1.8 million was partially offset by a decrease in accounts receivable of approximately $1.0 million. The increase in the fair value of the derivative instruments primarily relates to the change in PharmAthene’s stock price from December 30, 2011 to June 29, 2012. Net cash used in operating activities was approximately $2.3 million, $7.8 million and $14.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Net cash used in operations during the year ended December 31, 2012 reflects PharmAthene’s net loss of $4.9 million, adjusted for non-cash share-based compensation expense of $1.9 million, the $1.2 million gain on the realization of the cumulative translation adjustment related to PharmAthene Canada, Inc., the decrease in the fair value of derivative instruments of $0.6 million and other noncash expenses of $0.6 million. The decrease in accounts receivable of approximately $2.0 million and increase in deferred revenue of approximately $0.9 million was partially offset by an increase in unbilled accounts receivable of approximately $1.1 million.

Net cash used in operations during the year ended December 31, 2011 reflects PharmAthene’s net loss of $3.8 million, adjusted for the change in market value of non-cash derivative instruments of $7.1 million, the sale of the assets held for sale for a net gain of $0.8 million and depreciation of $0.5 million. Net cash used

175


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

in operations was also impacted by non-cash shared-based compensation expense of $2.6 million, a decrease in unbilled accounts receivable of $1.0 million, prepaid expenses and other current assets of $1.5 million, and accounts payable of $1.7 million.

Net cash used in operations during the year ended December 31, 2010 reflects PharmAthene’s net loss of $34.8 million, adjusted for the change in market value of derivative instruments of $5.5 million, non-cash interest of $4.7 million, bad debt expense of $2.9 million, and non-cash shared-based compensation expenses of $2.5 million, decreases in unbilled accounts receivable of $5.4 million and in accounts receivable of $1.3 million, increases in depreciation and amortization of $5.7 million (including an impairment charge of $4.6 million) primarily associated with the write down of Canadian assets, and an increase in accounts payable of $1.2 million, and adjusted upward by a decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities of $8.5 million.

Investing Activities

There were no significant investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012. There were no significant investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2012. The net cash provided by investing activities was approximately $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 as compared to net cash provided of approximately $2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. Investing activities in 2011 consisted primarily of the sale of the Canadian farm operations. Investing activities for 2010 related primarily to liquidating available for sale investments to meet working capital requirements.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $3.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to, $2.4 million provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was principally the result of net proceeds received from sales of PharmAthene’s stock under the controlled equity offering arrangement partially offset by the repayment the current portion of long-term debt and net repayment of the revolving credit agreement. The majority of PharmAthene’s cash provided by financing for the six months ended June 30, 2012, was a result of PharmAthene entering into a senior fully-secured debt facility.

On March 25, 2013, PharmAthene entered into a controlled equity offering arrangement pursuant to which PharmAthene may offer and sell, from time to time, through a sales agent, shares of PharmAthene’s common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $15.0 million. Under the arrangement, the agent may sell shares by any method permitted by law and deemed to be an “at-the-market” offering as defined in Rule 415 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, including sales made directly on the NYSE MKT, on any other existing trading market for the Common Stock or to or through a market maker. PharmAthene is not obligated to sell any shares under this arrangement. PharmAthene is obligated to pay the agent a commission of 3.0% of the aggregate gross proceeds from each sale of shares. As of June 30, 2013, aggregate gross sales for additional common stock of approximately $10.4 million remained available under the arrangement. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, PharmAthene is currently prohibited from using the arrangement.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to $5.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 and $21.5 million provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2010.

The majority of PharmAthene’s cash provided by financing for the year ended December 31, 2012, related to PharmAthene’s debt arrangements with GE Capital, as described in Note 6 to PharmAthene’s consolidated financial statements. The term loan of $2.5 million and approximately $1.3 million under the revolving line of credit were outstanding as of December 31, 2012.

In 2011, PharmAthene raised net proceeds of approximately $5.8 million primarily from the issuance and sale of 1,857,143 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase up to an additional 371,423 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.50 per share.

Net cash provided from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2010 was primarily the result of the proceeds from the issuance of common stock and warrants.

176


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In April 2010, PharmAthene completed a public offering of 1,666,668 shares of PharmAthene’s common stock at $1.50 per share and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 500,000 shares of PharmAthene’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.89 per share, generating net proceeds of approximately $2.2 million.

In July 2010, PharmAthene completed a public offering of 2,785,714 shares of PharmAthene’s common stock at $1.40 per share and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,323,214 shares of PharmAthene’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.63 per share, generating net proceeds of approximately $3.5 million.

In November 2010, PharmAthene completed an underwritten public offering of 4,945,000 shares of PharmAthene’s common stock at a price to the public of $3.50 per share, generating net proceeds of approximately $15.9 million.

As discussed in Note 8 to PharmAthene’s consolidated financial statements, PharmAthene has issued and sold certain stock purchase warrants for fixed exercise prices that range from $1.61 to $3.97. Since these warrants are classified in stockholders’ equity, any loss in value upon exercise as a result of the warrant being “in the money” will result in dilution to existing stockholders and such dilution will not be reflected in PharmAthene’s consolidated statements of operations or consolidated statements of comprehensive loss.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

PharmAthene does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Contractual Obligations

The following are contractual commitments at June 30, 2013:

         
Contractual Obligations(1)   Total   Less than
1 Year
  1 - 3 Years   3 - 5 Years   More than
5 Years
Operating facility leases   $ 3,226,000     $ 797,600     $ 1,643,200     $ 785,200     $  
Research and development agreements     4,144,000       4,138,000       6,000              
Term loan, principal payments only     2,250,001       999,996       1,250,005              
Total contractual obligations   $ 9,620,001     $ 5,935,596     $ 2,899,205     $ 785,200     $  

(1) This table does not include any royalty payments relating to future sales of products subject to license agreements PharmAthene has entered into in relation to its in-licensed technology, as the timing and likelihood of such payments are not known. In addition, the table does not include the final payment fee of $75,000 on the term loan, which is being accrued and expensed over the term of the agreement, using the effective interest method, or the debt discount, which is being amortized over the term of the agreement. The debt discount and final payment accrual at June 30, 2013 were $32,214 and $39,810 respectively.

The following are contractual commitments at December 31, 2012:

         
Contractual Obligations(1)   Total   Less than
1 Year
  1 - 3 Years   3 - 5 Years   More than
5 Years
Operating facility leases   $ 3,631,800     $ 809,400     $ 1,619,300     $ 1,203,100     $  
Research and development agreements     7,252,600       7,252,600                    
Term loan     2,500,000       749,997       1,750,003              
Total contractual obligations   $ 13,384,400     $ 8,811,997     $ 3,369,303     $ 1,203,100     $  

(1) This table does not include any royalty payments relating to future sales of products subject to license agreements PharmAthene has entered into in relation to its in-licensed technology, as the timing and likelihood of such payments are not known. In addition, the table does not include the final payment fee of $75,000 on the term loan, which is being accrued and expensed over the term of the agreement, using the effective interest method or the debt discount, which is being amortized over the term of the agreement. The debt discount and final payment accrual at December 31, 2012 were $45,895 and $25,278 respectively.

177


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT THE MARKET RISK OF PHARMATHENE

PharmAthene’s exposure to market risk is currently confined to PharmAthene’s cash and cash equivalents and PharmAthene’s revolving line of credit. PharmAthene currently does not hedge interest rate exposure or foreign currency exchange exposure. PharmAthene has not used derivative financial instruments for speculation or trading purposes.

PharmAthene’s current operations in foreign countries are minimal. PharmAthene has closed PharmAthene’s active operations in Canada and maintains only nominal operations in the United Kingdom. A 10% change in exchange rates (against the U.S. dollar) would not have a material impact on its earnings, fair values or cash flow.

Because of the short-term maturities of PharmAthene’s cash and cash equivalents, PharmAthene does not believe that an increase in market interest rates would have a significant impact on its realized value. PharmAthene’s term loan with GE Capital is at a fixed 10.14% rate. Because of the fixed rate, a change in market interest rates would not have a material impact on interest expense associated with the loan. The interest rate on the revolving line of credit is variable; therefore, a 1% increase in market interest rates above the interest rate floor of 1.5%, would increase interest expense associated with the line by $50,000 if the maximum amount of the line ($5.0 million) was drawn for a full year.

The change in fair value of PharmAthene’s derivative instruments is calculated utilizing the Black-Scholes model; therefore, a 10% increase/decrease in the closing price of PharmAthene’s common stock at June 30, 2013, would have resulted in a change in fair value of derivative instruments and PharmAthene’s earnings of approximately $0.3 million.

178


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

PharmAthene’s Retiring Directors and Executive Officers

Set forth below is information, as of September 6, 2013, regarding each current director of PharmAthene who is not expected to continue to serve as director of PharmAthene after the merger;

   
Name   Age   Position
Joel W. McCleary*   64   Director
Jeffrey W. Runge, M.D.*   57   Director
Steven St. Peter, M.D.*   46   Director

* Independent Director.

Joel W. McCleary.  Mr. McCleary has served as a member of the Board of Directors since August 3, 2007 and from inception to August 3, 2007 was Chairman of the Board of Directors of former PharmAthene. Mr. McCleary is founding member of Four Seasons Ventures LLC founded in 2005. Mr. McCleary is the founder and Chairman of Q Global International, an organization which provides close protection services for global leaders against the threat of assassination or incapacitation from chemical, biological and radiological threats. Prior to 2005, Mr. McCleary has served as a White House Aide, Treasurer of the Democratic Party, President of the Sawyer-Miller Group International, and President of the Institute for Asian Democracy. He has served as a consultant to the Department of State. He is a co-founder and former board member of Raydiance Inc. In 2012, Mr. McCleary joined the board of advisors of Guggenheim International, a subsidiary of Guggenheim Partners LLC, a global diversified financial services firm. Guggenheim International is an organization dedicated to building cross-border strategic partnerships and providing solutions to sovereign, institutional, corporate, and high-net-worth clients. Mr. McCleary received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Harvard University. Mr. McCleary was chosen to serve as a director of PharmAthene primarily because of his impressive public service record in a variety of governmental and quasi-governmental organizations, enabling him to offer valuable guidance to the Board of Directors and PharmAthene with respect to PharmAthene’s government strategy.

Jeffrey W. Runge, M.D.  Dr. Runge has served as a member of the Board of Directors since December 2009. Dr. Runge is a Principal at The Chertoff Group, a firm providing advisory services in business risk management, homeland security and homeland defense. He is also the President and founder of Biologue, Inc., which provides consulting in biodefense, medical preparedness and injury prevention and control. From 2001 through August of 2008, Dr. Runge served in the Bush administration, first as the head of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and, beginning in September 2005, as the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) first Chief Medical Officer. Dr. Runge founded the DHS Office of Health Affairs in 2007 and was confirmed by the Senate as DHS’ first Assistant Secretary for Health Affairs in December of 2007. Dr. Runge also served as Acting DHS Undersecretary for Science and Technology from February through August 2006. In his role at DHS, Dr. Runge oversaw the operations of the department’s biodefense activities, medical preparedness and workforce health protection, including managing DHS’ role in Project BioShield, working with the various federal departments on medical countermeasure assurance. Prior to joining DHS, Dr. Runge was Assistant Chairman of the Department of Emergency Medicine at the Carolinas Medical Center in Charlotte, NC, from 1984 through 2001. Dr. Runge earned his medical degree from the Medical University of South Carolina and his undergraduate degree from the University of the South. Dr. Runge was chosen to serve as a director of PharmAthene because of his invaluable background in the public sector, particularly his experience in the Bush administration as a founder of the DHS Office of Health Affairs, as well as his practical experience in the medical field.

Steven St. Peter, M.D.  Dr. St. Peter has served as a member of the Board of Directors since August 3, 2007 and from October 2004 to August 3, 2007 was a member of the Board of Directors of former PharmAthene. Dr. St. Peter is President, CEO and Director of Aratana Therapeutics, an animal health company, a position he assumed in September 2012. Dr. St. Peter was employed by MPM Capital from 2004 to May 2012, and he was a Managing Director based in the Boston office. His investment scope included both venture and buyout transactions across the pharmaceuticals and medical technology industries. He has previous investment experience from Apax Partners and The Carlyle Group. Dr. St. Peter was previously an

179


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

assistant Clinical Professor of Medicine at Columbia University. He completed his Doctor of Medicine at Washington University and his residency and fellowship at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. Prior to his medical training, he was an investment banker at Merrill Lynch. He also holds an M.B.A. from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and a B.A. in Chemistry from the University of Kansas. He is on the Board of Directors of the New England Venture Capital Association and he is also a director of Aratana Therapeutics, Inc. His previous board experience includes Omrix Biopharmaceuticals, Helicos Biosciences Corporation, EKR Therapeutics, Inc., Proteon Therapeutics, Inc., Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr. St. Peter was chosen to serve as a director of PharmAthene because of his diverse background as a venture capital investor, investment banker, professor of medicine and director of several healthcare companies, which provides him with a unique perspective in serving on PharmAthene’s Board of Directors.

Set forth below is information, as of September 3, 2013, regarding each of PharmAthene’s executive officers who is not expected to continue to serve as executive officer of PharmAthene after completion of the merger:

   
Name   Age   Office
Eric I. Richman*   52   President and Chief Executive Officer
Linda L. Chang   47   Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

* Mr. Richman is expected to serve as a member of the Board of Directors of PharmAthene after completion of the merger. His biography appears in the section entitled “MANAGEMENT OF THE COMBINED COMPANY—Non-Employee Directors.”

Linda L. Chang.  Ms. Chang assumed the position of Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of PharmAthene in November 2011. Ms. Chang had been employed for the last 11 years at Human Genome Sciences, Inc., most recently as Senior Director of Finance. Prior to serving at Human Genome Sciences, Ms. Chang was an Associate at Booz Allen & Hamilton. Earlier in her career, Ms. Chang worked at Grant Thornton, LLP and Otsuka America Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Ms. Chang is a Certified Public Accountant. She earned an MBA as well as a Master of Accountancy degree from the University of Georgia and a BS from the University of California, Riverside.

PharmAthene’s Executive Compensation

PharmAthene’s Compensation Discussion and Analysis.  This section discusses the principles underlying PharmAthene’s executive compensation decisions. It provides qualitative information on the factors relevant to these decisions and the manner in which compensation is awarded to PharmAthene’s Named Executive Officers.

PharmAthene’s Compensation Objectives

The objectives of the Compensation Committee, which PharmAthene also refers to simply “the committee,” in establishing its compensation policy for executive officers and other employees are to:

compensate competitively in order to attract, retain and motivate a highly competent executive team dedicated to achieving PharmAthene’s goals and strategic plans, which are designed to result in long-term growth in stockholder value;
tie individual compensation to individual performance and the success of PharmAthene; and
align officers’ and selected eligible employees’ interests with those of PharmAthene and its stockholders by providing long-term compensation opportunities through participation in PharmAthene’s equity-based incentive compensation plan and/or any successor or other long-term incentive compensation plans as may be adopted from time to time.

The market for talented individuals in the biotechnology industry is highly competitive. The committee considers peer groups, survey data and, from time to time, advice from independent compensation consultants when determining PharmAthene’s compensation structure. The committee has structured compensation between base salary and cash bonuses such that approximately 40% of PharmAthene’s CEO’s and 25% of its

180


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

other senior executives’ total cash compensation is at risk. Non-cash compensation for executive officers is structured to provide a reward for corporate and individual performance. The committee believes that this approach provides an appropriate incentive that aligns the executive officer compensation with PharmAthene’s long-term strategic and performance goals, and also retains and motivates key executive officers.

Overview and Role of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee reviews and approves PharmAthene’s compensation policies. The specific roles of the Committee include:

recommending to the Board, in consultation with senior management of PharmAthene, (i) the corporate goals and objectives relevant to compensation of officers and directors and (ii) the compensation and benefits philosophy and strategy for PharmAthene;
recommending performance measures and, if applicable, goals for measuring performance in consultation with senior management of PharmAthene;
assessing the performance of the Chairman of the Board, CEO and President;
evaluating competitive pay levels for key executives of other biodefense and life sciences companies based on industry analyses;
recommending to the board for approval compensation for the CEO and President, including salary, bonus, restricted securities, stock options, and, if applicable, any supplemental compensation or benefit arrangements;
making determinations with respect to the grant of stock options and restricted securities under the 2007 Plan to all officers of PharmAthene, other than the CEO and President, and report to the board on such determinations at the Board’s subsequent meeting;
making determinations with respect to the grant of stock options and restricted securities under the 2007 Plan to all employees who are not officers of PharmAthene and to consultants eligible to receive such grants under such plan, or, at the committee’s sole discretion, delegate such responsibility to the CEO and President, subject to any limitations it shall impose from time to time;
to the extent not covered by the determinations above, reviewing and approving compensation programs applicable to officers and other selected employees and, upon recommendation of the Chairman of the Board and CEO and President, reviewing and recommending the Board’s approval of individual compensation awards for the officers;
recommending to the board for approval the compensation for directors, including retainer, committee chairman’s fees, the grant of restricted securities or stock options and other similar items, as appropriate;
overseeing the preparation of, and approving, this section of PharmAthene’s annual proxy statement.

Compensation Process

The implementation of the compensation philosophy is carried out under the supervision of the Compensation Committee. The compensation for PharmAthene’s President and Chief Executive Officer is approved by the Board of Directors after the committee has provided its analysis and recommendation. The compensation for the other executive officers is determined by the committee. Management, under guidelines approved by the committee, makes decisions regarding compensation of non-executive officer employees.

The Compensation Committee charter requires the committee to meet at least once per year, and in practice the committee meets several times per year. Typically late in the fourth quarter or early in the first quarter of the following year, annual executive officer performance reviews and life sciences company survey compensation data are reviewed and base salary adjustments, bonus payouts and annual equity grants approved. Annual performance goals are typically finalized in the first quarter.

181


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Compensation Survey Data, Consultants and Peer Group

The Compensation Committee consults publicly available compensation survey data provided by third party vendors, such as Radford, for similarly sized life sciences companies (i.e., with between 50 and 149 employees). To evaluate PharmAthene’s competitive position in the industry related to executive compensation, the committee has historically reviewed and analyzed survey data summarizing the compensation packages, including base salary levels, cash bonus awards and equity awards offered by other similarly sized life sciences companies. The committee believes selection use of these data on an annual basis provides useful long-term trend data for companies that compete with PharmAthene for talent.

The committee has the authority to engage the services of independent compensation consultants, and it has done so from time to time in the past. However, the committee did not engage a third-party compensation consultant to assist the committee in establishing 2012 overall compensation levels, specific compensation awards or annual performance goals for 2013. Most recently, the committee engaged a third-party compensation consultant, James Reda & Associates, to assist it in designing and adopting the change in control compensation policy for executives. Specifically, the committee looked at a peer group that consisted of: Somaxon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Aelous Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Soligenix, Inc., Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc., Javelin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., SIGA Technologies, Inc., CombinatoRx, Incorporated (now known as Zalicus Inc.), Trubion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cypress BioScience, Inc., BioSphere Medical, Inc., Dynavax Technologies Corp., Osiris Therapeutics, Inc., Verenium Corporation, Xoma Ltd., ZymoGenetics Inc., and Emergent Biosolutions, Inc.

Components of Compensation

PharmAthene’s compensation for executives consists of five components: base salary, cash bonuses, equity awards, and retirement benefits as provided under PharmAthene’s 401(k) plan. PharmAthene’s President and Chief Executive Officer annually reviews the performance and contributions of each executive officer (other than himself) and reports the results of such reviews to the Compensation Committee. PharmAthene’s Board of Directors annually reviews the performance and contributions of the President and Chief Executive Officer.

Using significant discretion, the committee considers each executive’s performance, contributions, responsibilities, experience, and qualifications when determining the appropriate compensation level for each executive in light of the relevant compensation survey data. The components of PharmAthene’s executive officer compensation are described below.

Base Salary

The base salary component of compensation is designed to compensate executive officers competitively at levels necessary to attract and retain qualified executives in the life sciences industry. As a general matter, the base salary for each executive officer is based on the scope of each executive’s responsibilities, as well as his/her qualifications, breadth of experience, performance record, and depth and breadth of applicable functional expertise. Base salaries of the executive officers are reviewed by the committee annually in light of personal and Company goal attainment, executive officer performance reviews and compensation survey data. Adjustments to each executive’s base salary are based upon individual performance, changes in the general level of base salaries of persons in comparable positions within the industry, as indicated by compensation survey data, and the average merit salary increase for such year for all employees of PharmAthene established by the committee, as well as other factors the committee judges to be pertinent during an assessment period. In making base salary decisions, the committee exercises its discretion to determine the appropriate weight to be given to each of these factors. Adjustments may be made during the fiscal year for promotions, highly urgent competitive reasons, superior performance in response to changed or challenging circumstances and other special circumstances.

The Named Executive Officer annualized base salaries for 2012 were as follows: Mr. Richman, President and Chief Executive Officer, $442,900; Dr. Thomas Fuerst, Executive Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer, $319,642; Mr. Karp, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, $309,000; Ms. Chang, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, $300,000; Ms. Cook, Senior Vice President, Policy & Government Affairs, $283,069. On October 19, 2012, Dr. Fuerst resigned his position as a Company employee and entered

182


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

into a Separation Agreement and General Release and Waiver. Pursuant to that agreement, among other benefits Dr. Fuerst was paid six months base salary as severance.

Effective January 1, 2013, the NEO’s annualized base salaries are as follows: $456,187 for Mr. Richman; $320,588 for Mr. Karp; $318,000 for Ms. Chang; and $294,392 for Ms. Cook. These adjustments to base salaries were established on expected market trends for merit increases and each officer’s base salary relative to his peer group. This resulted in an approximate three percent increase in base salary for these individuals except for Ms. Chang, whose base salary had an additional increase due to her base salary being below the peer group.

Cash Bonuses

PharmAthene’s Compensation Committee has adopted a bonus program, or the Bonus Program, for PharmAthene’s executive officers and other employees to be identified from time to time by the Chief Executive Officer. The Bonus Program was established to provide for the payment to members of management and identified employees of a bonus that is linked to achievement of key corporate performance objectives and, in the case of executives, also to the achievement of key personal objectives. The goal of the Bonus Program is to reward personnel by providing further compensation to members of management and identified employees based on the achievement of specified annual goals that the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors believe correlate closely with the growth of long-term stockholder value. PharmAthene believes that the Bonus Program also promotes greater communication among employees and fosters the appropriate feedback for enhanced productivity and effectiveness.

The Bonus Program is intended to be applicable to the following members of management: the President and Chief Executive Officer, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, the Senior Vice President & General Counsel, the Senior Vice President, Policy & Government Affairs, and the Senior Vice President — Regulatory Affairs and Quality. The Chief Executive reviews and approves the annual performance objectives of each of his senior executives. Annually and based upon the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee approves (i) a target bonus pool amount, (ii) a target bonus payout for each executive in the Bonus Program, (iii) the corporate achievement percentages and any other one-off bonus adjustments that will be used to determine the corporate performance component of the bonus based upon a comparison of PharmAthene’s financial and operational performance for the fiscal year against the approved financial and operating plan for the fiscal year, and (iv) the relative weight or importance of the corporate performance objectives and the personal performance objectives. Annually, the Compensation Committee reviews PharmAthene’s actual financial and operational performance and each executive’s personal performance to determine the appropriate adjustment to the executive’s target bonus.

Determining the annual target bonus pool.  In each fiscal year, the committee determines a target bonus pool for that fiscal year, how much of that pool should be allocated to executive officers and how much should be allocated to all other personnel. This pool will be a target which may be revised by the committee in its discretion.

For fiscal year 2012, the target bonus pool was equal to the approximate sum of (i) 60% of the base salary for the Chief Executive Officer, (ii) 30% of the aggregate base salary of the other executives and certain other key employees, and (iii) 10% of the aggregate base salary of all other employees of PharmAthene. The target bonus pool for the Chief Executive Officer and other senior executives was based on bonus targets set forth in the employment agreements for those individuals.

The pool was divided among the relevant executives with reference to the achievement of specific personal and corporate performance targets. Generally, the Compensation Committee has the discretion to award more or less than the target bonus payout; and any particular executive or key employee may be awarded a bonus that is greater or less than 30% of their base salary and any non-executive employee may be awarded a bonus that is greater or less than 10% of their base salary. The board has the discretion to award more or less than the target bonus payout (i.e., 60% of base salary) for the CEO. Finally, the pool may be increased at the discretion of the committee to the extent new executive officers and other employees may be hired during the year.

183


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Determining the annual target bonus payout.  During each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee determines the target bonus payout for each executive in the Bonus Program taking into account any terms regarding bonuses which may be contained in each executive’s employment agreement. The board will consider all factors that it deems relevant to such determination, including, but not limited to, the recommendations of PharmAthene’s Chief Executive Officer (except with respect to his own bonus), competitive market conditions, and the Board’s assessment of the level of growth reflected in PharmAthene’s financial performance objectives. The executives are not subject to a maximum bonus payout. Generally, bonuses will be paid in cash.

Determining the corporate achievement percentages and corporate performance objectives.  In each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee reviews with the executive team and establishes corporate performance objectives for the fiscal year that will apply to all senior executives, including the Chief Executive Officer, and achievement percentages that will be used to evaluate the portion of the bonus applicable to each executive based upon PharmAthene’s financial and operational performance.

The Compensation Committee established with management the following corporate performance objectives for 2012, with percentage weighting reflecting the approximate percentage value to be placed upon the achievement of each target in the determination of whether the overall corporate performance objectives have been met:

Initiate human clinical trial for SparVax® (25%)
Achieve contracted technical program milestones (25%)
Annual financial performance in line with board approved budget (30%)
Continued strong performance under existing SparVax® development contract as reflected in customer feedback (20%)

The committee determined that PharmAthene had achieved 55% of these goals in 2012.

The Compensation Committee established with management the following corporate performance objectives for 2013, with percentage weighting reflecting the approximate percentage value to be placed upon the achievement of each target in the determination of whether the overall corporate performance objectives have been met:

Remove clinical hold for SparVax® (25%)
Annual financial performance in line with board approved budget (15%)
Secure additional funding for SparVax® program (25%)
Broaden product candidate pipeline (35%)

Determining personal performance objectives.  Each executive’s annual personal performance objectives are agreed upon by the executive and approved by PharmAthene’s Chief Executive Officer (except with respect to his own personal objectives). The personal performance objectives of PharmAthene’s Chief Executive Officer are the corporate performance objectives set forth above.

Determining relative weight of corporate performance objectives and personal objectives.  The Compensation Committee also evaluates the relative weight or importance that will be placed on achievement of the corporate performance objectives and the personal performance objectives.

Measuring performance.  After the end of the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee measures PharmAthene’s actual performance against its corporate performance objectives and considers each executive’s personal performance against his or her personal performance objectives to determine the appropriate bonus allocable to each executive officer from the target bonus pool. The committee considers the executive’s overall contribution to PharmAthene’s success and, in the case of executives other than the Chief Executive Officer, the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer. In determining the appropriate bonuses, the Compensation Committee also considers other performance considerations related to unforeseen events occurring during the

184


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

fiscal year. The committee has discretion to award a bonus that is more or less than the amount determined by the procedures outlined above or to award no bonus at all.

Equity Awards

The committee provides PharmAthene’s executive officers with long-term incentive compensation through grants of stock options and/or restricted stock awards, or RSAs, under the 2007 Plan. The 2007 Plan creates a strong link to PharmAthene’s long term financial and equity market performance, create an ownership culture, and closely align the interests of PharmAthene’s executive officers with the stockholders. The committee believes that these grants directly motivate an executive to maximize long-term stockholder value and create an effective tool for incentivizing and retaining those executives who are most responsible for influencing stockholder value. The grants also utilize vesting periods that encourage key executives to continue in the employ of PharmAthene. Among other things, the committee considers individual performance of the executive officer, the anticipated contribution of the executive officer to the attainment of PharmAthene’s long-term strategic performance goals, and retention and motivation of key executives in determining equity awards. The equity awards for each year are set to enable PharmAthene to attract, motivate, and retain highly skilled executives. Long-term incentives granted in prior years may be taken into consideration, but do not play a significant role in current year determinations.

It has been PharmAthene’s practice to make equity-based awards to its executives on an annual basis. Annual non-qualified stock option awards to executives typically vest over four years and have a ten year term. In addition, from time to time, PharmAthene has granted additional stock options to specific executive officers for promotions, superior performance in response to changed or challenging circumstances and other special circumstances. All stock option awards are priced based upon the closing price of PharmAthene’s common stock on the date of grant, which is also the approval date, by the committee or Board of Directors. From time to time PharmAthene has also granted RSAs, with varying vesting periods. The Company does not maintain any equity ownership guidelines for its executive officers.

On December 3, 2012, the Compensation Committee approved stock option awards to the executive officers, other than the CEO, under the 2007 Plan. The board approved a stock option award to the CEO on December 12, 2012 under the 2007 Plan. The stock option awards were determined based on individual performance and contribution to long-term strategic and performance goals and as well as retention and motivation of the Named Executive Officers. The individual grants of stock options to executive officers were: Mr. Richman 150,000 stock options; Mr. Karp 65,000 stock options; Ms. Chang 75,000 stock options; and Ms. Cook 65,000 stock options. These stock options vests 25% per year starting on the first anniversary of the date of grant.

Retirement Benefits

The terms of PharmAthene’s 401(k) Savings Plan, or the 401(k) Plan, provide for executive officer and broad-based employee participation on the same general terms. Under the 401(k) Plan, all Company employees were formerly eligible to receive from PharmAthene matching contributions that vested 25% per year over four years. The Company’s basic matching contribution for the 401(k) Plan was suspended September 1, 2010 and has been reinstated as of July 1, 2013. The Company made no discretionary contributions to the 401(k) Plan in 2012.

Severance Agreements and Other Benefits

Executive officers are eligible to participate in PharmAthene’s employee benefit plans on the same terms as all other full-time employees. These plans include medical, dental and life insurance. In addition to the benefits available to all employees, PharmAthene provides its executive officers with certain additional benefits that PharmAthene believes reflect market standards and are reasonable and necessary to attract and/or retain each of PharmAthene’s executive officers and allow the executive officers to realize the full benefit of the other elements of compensation PharmAthene provides. These benefits include a monthly travel allowance and eligibility for four weeks of vacation from the date of hire.

In addition, executive officers are eligible to receive severance benefits in connection with terminations of employment due to death, disability, or termination without cause or constructive termination (including

185


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

following a change-in-control) as set forth below and more fully described in the section entitled “THE MERGER—Interests of PharmAthene’s Directors and Officers in the Merger—Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control above. The Compensation Committee believes that the executive severance arrangements reflect current market standards and severance benefits competitive with those provided by PharmAthene’s peer group. The committee believes that to continue to retain the services of PharmAthene’s key executive officers, it is important to provide them with some income and benefit protection against an involuntary termination of employment.

In the event that an executive dies or is disabled, the executive has the right to receive the unpaid portion of the base salary as of the date of termination, payment of the executive’s accrued but unpaid amounts and extension of applicable benefits in accordance with the terms of any incentive compensation, retirement, employee welfare or other employee benefit plans or programs of PharmAthene in which the executive is then participating in accordance with the terms of such plans or programs, and reimbursement for any expenses for which the executive shall not have theretofore been reimbursed.

Upon the termination of an executive’s employment without cause or for “Good Reason,” in addition to the payments set forth in the immediately preceding paragraph, the executive has the right to receive base salary continuation for 6 months (12 months in the case of Mr. Richman and 9 months in the case of Ms. Chang, with certain adjustments intended as described under “QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT THE MARKET RISK OF PHARMATHENE—PharmAthene’s Executive Compensation”). Base salary continuation is conditioned on the executive entering into a general release with terms reasonably satisfactory to PharmAthene.

Under a severance plan adopted in May 2012, PharmAthene’s Board of Directors approved the following severance plan for PharmAthene’s executives in the event of termination of an executive’s employment without cause or for “Good Reason” in the event of a “change of control.” For PharmAthene’s President and Chief Executive Officer, the plan includes: (a) payments equal to 24 months of base salary; (b) two times target annual cash bonus; (c) health and other benefits continuation for 24 months; and (d) an excise tax gross up. For the other executives, the plan includes (a) base salary continuation for 18 months; (b)1.5 times target annual cash bonus; (c) health and other benefits continuation for 18 months; and (d) in lieu of an excise tax gross up, a “best executive choice” provision under which the executive can elect to reduce his or her severance payment to the extent necessary to avoid triggering excise tax on such payment. PharmAthene’s Board of Directors can modify or terminate the severance plan at any time, and the board has taken action to terminate the Severance Plan upon the closing of the merger. Please see the section “QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT THE MARKET RISK OF PHARMATHENE—PharmAthene’s Executive Compensation” for a description of the applicability of the Severance Plan to the merger.

The committee believes that in order to continue to retain the services of PharmAthene’s key executive officers and focus their efforts on stockholder interests when considering strategic alternatives, it is important to provide them with enhanced income and benefit protection against loss of employment in connection with a change-in-control of PharmAthene’s company and thereby align the interests of PharmAthene’s stockholders and PharmAthene’s executive officers.

Say-on-Pay Vote

Having qualified in prior years as a “smaller reporting company,” PharmAthene was previously not required to submit its executive compensation policies and decisions to a non-binding stockholder “say-on-pay” vote and has not done so.

Tax Considerations

Section 162(m) Policy

The Compensation Committee has found it unnecessary to consider the applicability of Section 162(m) of the Code because no executive officer receives compensation in excess of one million dollars.

186


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Summary Compensation Table

The following Summary Compensation Table sets forth, for the stated fiscal years, all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to PharmAthene’s Named Executive Officers.

               
Name and
Principal Position
  Year   Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)(1)
  Stock Awards
($)(2)
  Option Awards
($)(2)
  Non-equity Incentive Plan Compensation
($)(1)
  All Other Compensation   Total
($)
Eric I. Richman President and Chief Executive Officer, Director(3)     2012       442,900       146,157                129,915                         718,972  
    2011       435,000       93,560       131,000       225,312                         884,872  
    2010       334,421                136,850       1,563,803       105,000       9,000       2,149,074  
Linda L. Chang
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(4)
    2012       300,000       71,100                61,695                         432,795  
Jordan P. Karp, Esq.
Senior Vice President and General Counsel(5)
    2012       309,000       67,671                53,469                12,000       442,140  
    2011       300,000       44,280       44,000       124,818                12,000       525,098  
Francesca Cook
Senior Vice President, Policy and Gov’t Affairs(6)
    2012       283,069       67,087                53,469                12,000       415,625  
Thomas R. Fuerst, Ph.D.
Executive Vice President, Chief, Scientific Officer(7)
    2012       257,949                                           178,420       436,369  
    2011       313,632       35,454                88,869                24,000       461,955  
    2010       226,599       65,000                661,926       17,700       17,754       988,979  

(1) Amounts appearing in the Bonus column include any previously guaranteed bonuses and, in accordance with SEC guidance, also include discretionary bonus payments, while any amounts appearing in the Non-equity Incentive Plan Compensation column reflect non-discretionary bonus payments awarded under the PharmAthene Bonus Program for executive officers and other employees, i.e., any amounts that were earned by the executive officers by meeting the relevant performance objectives specified in the PharmAthene Bonus Program. For 2012, those performance objectives are described in the section “QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT THE MARKET RISK OF PHARMATHENE—PharmAthene’s Executive Compensation.”
(2) Dollar amounts shown reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of stock/options computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 (formerly FAS 123R). The fair value was estimated using the assumptions detailed in Note 2 to PharmAthene’s Consolidated Financial Statements included in PharmAthene’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The material terms of each grant are described in the footnotes to the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End table” below.
(3) Mr. Richman was appointed PharmAthene’s President and Chief Operating Officer on March 25, 2010, its interim Chief Executive Officer on May 2, 2010 and its Chief Executive Officer on October 20, 2010. He became a director of PharmAthene on May 17, 2010. Mr. Richman did not receive any compensation for his service in his capacity as director.
(4) Ms. Chang was appointed PharmAthene’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in November 2011. As Ms. Chang was not a Named Executive Officer in 2011 and 2010, her summary compensation information for those years has been omitted from this table.
(5) As Mr. Karp was not a Named Executive Officer in 2010, his summary compensation information for 2010 has been omitted from this table.
(6) As Ms. Cook was not a Named Executive Officer in 2011 and 2010, her summary compensation information for those years has been omitted from this table.
(7) Dr. Fuerst was appointed PharmAthene’s Senior Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer in April 2010 and became PharmAthene’s Executive Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer in December 2010.

187


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Dr. Fuerst resigned from PharmAthene in October 2012. Amounts under “All Other Compensation” for 2012 include severance payments of $159,821, of which $53,274 was paid in 2012 and $106,547 was paid in 2013. In addition, the amount includes payments for housing and accrued vacation aggregating $18,599.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table sets forth information regarding each grant of an award made to each Named Executive Officer during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 under any plan, contract, authorization or arrangement pursuant to which cash, securities, similar instruments or other property may be received.

       
Name   Grant Date   Number of Securities Underlying Options(1)   Exercise or Base Price
of Option Awards
($/sh)(2)
  Grant Date Fair Value of Option
Awards
($)(3)
Eric I. Richman     12/12/12       150,000       1.19       129,915  
Linda L. Chang     12/03/12       75,000       1.13       61,695  
Jordan P. Karp     12/03/12       65,000       1.13       53,469  
Francesca Cook     12/03/12       65,000       1.13       53,469  
Thomas R. Fuerst                                    

(1) Represents shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options granted during 2012.
(2) Represents the closing sales price of PharmAthene’s common stock on the NYSE MKT on the grant date.
(3) Dollar amounts shown reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of options computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 (formerly FAS 123R). The fair value was estimated using the assumptions detailed in Note 8 to PharmAthene’s Consolidated Financial Statements included in PharmAthene’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The material terms of each grant are described in the footnotes to the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End table” below.

In 2012, all equity awards were granted under PharmAthene’s 2007 Long Term Incentive plan and vest in four equal installments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.

188


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth information concerning the outstanding equity awards of each of the Named Executive Officers in the Summary Compensation Table as of December 31, 2012.

           
As of December 31, 2012
     Option Awards   Stock Awards
Name   Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options(1) Exercisable   Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options(1) Unexercisable   Option Exercise
Price
($)
  Option Expiration
Date
  Number of Shares or Units That Have Not Vested(2)   Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
($)(3)
Eric I. Richman, President and Chief Executive Officer(4)     28,638       0     $ 2.96       11/15/2013 (5)                   
    11,043       0     $ 3.80       1/18/2015 (6)                   
    4,510       0     $ 3.80       2/22/2016 (7)                   
    8,282       0     $ 3.80       1/4/2017 (8)                   
    260,000       0     $ 5.20       10/2/2017 (9)                   
    22,930       7,643     $ 2.46       1/21/2019 (10)                   
    50,000       50,000     $ 1.51       3/25/2020 (11)                   
    100,000       0     $ 1.48       5/18/2020 (12)                   
    62,500       62,500     $ 4.20       10/20/2020 (13)                   
    62,500       62,500     $ 3.34       11/3/2020 (14)                   
    112,500       112,500     $ 3.91       12/23/2020 (15)                   
    25,000       0     $ 1.76       9/30/2021 (16)                   
    37,500       112,500     $ 1.16       12/7/2021 (17)                   
    91,121       0     $ 1.16       12/7/2021 (18)                   
    0       150,000     $ 1.19       12/12/2022 (19)                   
Jordan Karp, Esq.,
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
    200,000       0     $ 2.37       7/2/2018 (24)                   
    3,594       1,198     $ 2.46       1/21/2019 (25)                   
    25,000       25,000     $ 1.38       5/6/2020 (26)                   
    37,500       37,500     $ 3.55       12/8/2020 (27)                   
    25,000       0     $ 1.76       9/30/2021 (28)                   
    18,750       56,250     $ 1.21       12/1/2021 (29)                   
    36,900       0     $ 1.21       12/1/2021 (30)                   
Thomas R. Fuerst, Ph.D., Executive Vice President Chief Scientific Officer     200,000       0     $ 1.69       4/5/2020 (20)                   
    10,000       0     $ 1.38       5/6/2020 (21)                   
    18,750       0     $ 3.55       12/8/2020 (22)                   
    29,545       0     $ 1.21       12/1/2021 (23)                   
Francesca Cook,
Senior Vice President, Policy and Government Affairs
    2,761       0     $ 2.96       10/14/2013 (32)                   
    8,283       0     $ 3.80       1/18/2015 (33)                   
    3,222       0     $ 3.80       2/22/2016 (34)                   
    8,281       0     $ 3.80       1/4/2017 (35)                   
    140,000       0     $ 5.20       10/2/2017 (36)                   
    19,303       6,434     $ 2.46       1/21/2019 (37)                   
    37,500       37,500     $ 1.38       5/6/2020 (38)                   
    37,500       37,500     $ 3.55       12/8/2020 (39)                   
    18,750       56,250     $ 1.21       12/1/2021 (40)                   
    30,933       0     $ 1.21       12/1/2021 (41)                   
    0       65,000     $ 1.13       12/3/2022 (42)                   
Linda L. Chang,
Chief Financial Officer
    57,500       112,500     $ 1.59       11/7/2021 (43)      13,333 (45)      14,933  
    0       75,000     $ 1.13       12/3/2022 (44)                   

189


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(1) Reflects options granted under PharmAthene’s 2007 Plan as well as options initially granted under the 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan and assumed by PharmAthene in the 2007 merger and now outstanding under the 2007 Plan. The exercise price of these options is subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments.
(2) Reflects restricted stock awards granted under PharmAthene’s 2007 Plan on November 7, 2011. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes below, all shares of restricted stock vest in three equal annual installments of 33 1/3rd of the grant beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant.
(3) Reflects a closing price of PharmAthene’s common stock on December 31, 2012 of $1.12 per share. The closing price of PharmAthene’s common stock on April 18, 2013 was $1.59.
(4) Mr. Richman was appointed PharmAthene’s President and Chief Operating Officer on March 25, 2010, PharmAthene’s interim Chief Executive Officer on May 2, 2010 and PharmAthene’s Chief Executive Officer on October 20, 2010. Through March 24, 2010, he was PharmAthene’s Senior Vice President, Business Development and Strategic Planning.
(5) Reflects options to purchase 28,638 shares of common stock granted on November 15, 2003, which are fully vested.
(6) Reflects options to purchase 11,043 shares of common stock granted on January 18, 2005, which are fully vested.
(7) Reflects options to purchase 4,510 shares of common stock granted on February 22, 2006, which are fully vested.
(8) Reflects options to purchase 8,282 shares of common stock granted on January 4, 2007, which are fully vested.
(9) Reflects options to purchase 260,000 shares of common stock granted on October 2, 2007, which are fully vested.
(10) Reflects options to purchase 30,573 shares of common stock granted on January 21, 2009 pursuant to which 25% vested on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date, subject to accelerated vesting as described in “QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT THE MARKET RISK OF PHARMATHENE—PharmAthene’s Executive Compensation.”
(11) Reflects options to purchase 100,000 shares granted on March 25, 2010, pursuant to which 25% vest on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date, subject to accelerated vesting as described in “QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT THE MARKET RISK OF PHARMATHENE—PharmAthene’s Executive Compensation.”
(12) Reflects options to purchase 100,000 shares granted on May 18, 2010, which are fully vested.
(13) Reflects options to purchase 125,000 shares granted on October 20, 2010, pursuant to which 25% vest on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date, subject to accelerated vesting as described in “QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT THE MARKET RISK OF PHARMATHENE—PharmAthene’s Executive Compensation.”
(14) Reflects options to purchase 125,000 shares granted on November 3, 2010, pursuant to which 25% vest on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date, subject to accelerated vesting as described in “QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT THE MARKET RISK OF PHARMATHENE—PharmAthene’s Executive Compensation.”
(15) Reflects options to purchase 225,000 shares granted on December 23, 2010, pursuant to which 25% vest on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date, subject to accelerated vesting as described in “QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT THE MARKET RISK OF PHARMATHENE—PharmAthene’s Executive Compensation.”
(16) Reflects options to purchase 25,000 shares granted on September 30, 2011, which are fully vested.
(17) Reflects options to purchase 150,000 shares granted on December 7, 2011, pursuant to which 25% vest on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date, subject to accelerated vesting as described in “QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT THE MARKET RISK OF PHARMATHENE—PharmAthene’s Executive Compensation.”
(18) Reflects options to purchase 91,121 shares granted on December 7, 2011, which are fully vested.
(19) Reflects options to purchase 150,000 shares granted on December 12, 2012, pursuant to which 25% vest on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date, subject to accelerated vesting as described in “QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT THE MARKET RISK OF PHARMATHENE—PharmAthene’s Executive Compensation.”

190


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(20) Reflects options to purchase 350,000 shares granted on April 5, 2010, of which 50,000 vested immediately, and 75,000 vested on the first and second anniversary of the grant date. The balance of the award was forfeited as a result of Dr. Fuerst’s October 19, 2012 resignation.
(21) Reflects options to purchase 20,000 shares granted on May 6, 2010, pursuant to which 25% vested on the first and second anniversary of the grant date. The balance of the award was forfeited as a result of Dr. Fuerst’s October 19, 2012 resignation.
(22) Reflects options to purchase 75,000 shares granted on December 8, 2010, pursuant to which 25% vested on the first and second anniversary of the grant date. The balance of the award was forfeited as a result of Dr. Fuerst’s October 19, 2012 resignation.
(23) Reflects options to purchase 29,545 shares granted on December 1, 2011, which vested in full with the modification made to the award as a part of Dr. Fuerst’s severance agreement. These options were exercised by Dr. Fuerst in March 2013.
(24) Reflects options to purchase 200,000 shares granted on July 2, 2008, which are fully vested.
(25) Reflects options to purchase 4,792 shares granted on January 21, 2009, pursuant to which 25% vested on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.
(26) Reflects options to purchase 50,000 shares granted on May 6, 2010, pursuant to which 25% vest on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.
(27) Reflects options to purchase 75,000 shares granted on December 8, 2010, pursuant to which 25% vest on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.
(28) Reflects options to purchase 25,000 shares granted on September 30, 2011, which are fully vested.
(29) Reflects options to purchase 75,000 shares granted on December 1, 2011, pursuant to which 25% vest on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.
(30) Reflects options to purchase 36,900 shares granted on December 1, 2011, which are fully vested.
(31) Reflects options to purchase 65,000 shares granted on December 3, 2012, pursuant to which 25% vest on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.
(32) Reflects options to purchase 5,522 shares of common stock granted on October 14, 2003, 2,761 of which were exercised and 2,761 which are fully vested but unexercised.
(33) Reflects options to purchase 11,044 shares of common stock granted on January 18, 2005, 2,761 of which were exercised and 8,283 which are fully vested but unexercised.
(34) Reflects options to purchase 3,222 shares of common stock granted on February 22, 2006, which are fully vested.
(35) Reflects options to purchase 8,281 shares of common stock granted on January 4, 2007, which are fully vested.
(36) Reflects options to purchase 140,000 shares of common stock granted on October 2, 2007 which are fully vested.
(37) Reflects options to purchase 25,737 shares of common stock granted on January 21, 2009, which vested in three equal annual installments of 33 1/3rd of the grant beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant, subject to accelerated vesting as described in “QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT THE MARKET RISK OF PHARMATHENE—PharmAthene’s Executive Compensation.”
(38) Reflects options to purchase 75,000 shares granted on May 6, 2010, pursuant to which 25% vest on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.
(39) Reflects options to purchase 75,000 shares granted on December 8, 2010, pursuant to which 25% vest on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.
(40) Reflects options to purchase 75,000 shares granted on December 1, 2011, pursuant to which 25% vest on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.
(41) Reflects options to purchase 30,933 shares granted on December 1, 2011, which are fully vested.
(42) Reflects options to purchase 65,000 shares granted on December 3, 2012, pursuant to which 25% vest on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.
(43) Reflects options to purchase 170,000 shares granted on April 5, 2010, of which 20,000 vested immediately, and 37,500 vest on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.

191


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(44) Reflects options to purchase 75,000 shares granted on December 3, 2012, pursuant to which 25% vest on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.
(45) Reflects 20,000 shares of restricted stock granted on November 7, 2011 pursuant to which 33.3% vested on each anniversary of the date of grant.

Option Exercises and Stock Awards Vested

The following table sets forth information regarding the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock awards during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 for each Named Executive Officer on an aggregated basis.

   
  Stock Awards
Name   Number of Shares Acquired
on Vest
  Value
Realized
on Vest(1)
Eric I. Richman     85,191     $ 109,860  
Jordan P. Karp     1,597     $ 2,172  
Francesca Cook     8,579     $ 11,667  
Linda L. Chang     6,667     $ 7,134  
Thomas R. Fuerst, Ph.D.            

(1) The amounts in the “Value Realized on Vest” column are calculated based on the difference between the closing market price per share of PharmAthene’s common stock on the date of vest, if available, or previous business day.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information regarding the number of securities to be issued under PharmAthene’s 2007 Plan, the weighted-average exercise price of options issued under the 2007 Plan and the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under the 2007 Plan, in each case as of December 31, 2012:

     
Plan category   Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights   Weighted- average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights   Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders     6,225,612 (1)    $ 2.52       7,521,334 (2) 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders                  
Total     6,225,612     $ 2.52       7,521,334  

(1) Does not include 13,333 shares of restricted stock granted under the 2007 Plan as of December 31, 2012.
(2) This amount includes shares underlying unexercised options already granted and reported in the first column. Under PharmAthene’s 2007 Plan, such shares are not treated as issued and are not counted as used against the plan limits until the options are exercised. If PharmAthene was to exclude shares underlying unexercised options already granted, this amount would be 1,295,722 as of December 31, 2012. Under PharmAthene’s 2007 Plan, the number of shares available for issuance under such plan is automatically increased as of the first day of its fiscal year, beginning in 2009 and occurring each year thereafter through 2015, by a number that is equal to the lower of (i) 1,100,000 shares, (ii) 2.5% of the outstanding shares of common stock as of the end of PharmAthene’s immediately preceding fiscal year, and (iii) any lesser number of shares determined by the Board; provided, however, that the aggregate number of shares available for issuance pursuant to such increases may not exceed 5,700,000 shares.

Further information regarding PharmAthene’s 2007 Plan is contained in Note 8 to its consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 contained elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation.

192


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone’s Executive Compensation

Fiscal 2012 Summary Compensation Table

The following table presents summary information concerning all compensation paid to or earned by Mr. Stocks, Dr. Ramos and Dr. Swiderek for services rendered to Theraclone in all capacities during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. These individuals are referred to below, collectively, as Theraclone’s Named Executive Officers. Theraclone’s Named Executive Officers are the only individuals who served as the principal executive officer or one of the two most highly compensated executive officers of Theraclone as of December 31, 2012 and who will continue to serve to serve in similar capacities at the combined company following the merger.

       
Name and Principal Position   Salary ($)   Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation ($)
  Option
Awards ($)(1)
  Total(4)
Clifford J. Stocks
Theraclone Chief Executive Officer
    365,000       111,781       14,512       491,293  
Eleanor Ramos, M.D.
Theraclone Chief Medical Officer
    353,903       77,416       14,512       445,831  
Kristine Swiderek, Ph.D.
Theraclone Chief Scientific Officer
    250,000       43,750       10,884       304,634  

(1) The amounts reported in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of stock options granted under Theraclone’s 2004 Stock Option Plan to its Named Executive Officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 as computed in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718. The assumptions used in calculating the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes of the equity awards reported in this column are set forth in note 8 to Theraclone’s consolidated financial statements included in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation. Note that the amounts reported in this column reflect the accounting cost for these stock options, and do not correspond to the actual economic value that may be received by Theraclone’s Named Executive Officers from the stock options.

Non-Equity Incentive Plan

For fiscal 2012, Mr. Stocks, Dr. Ramos and Dr. Swiderek were eligible to receive cash bonus payments of up to 35%, 25% and 20%, respectively, of their annual base salary, pursuant to each of their employment agreements. Theraclone’s Board of Directors awarded these cash bonuses based on Theraclone’s achievement of its 2012 corporate goals and objectives, which consisted of clinical development, discovery research and preclinical development, and corporate development and finance objectives. Theraclone’s Board of Directors determined that 87.5% of Theraclone’s 2012 corporate goals and objectives had been achieved, and therefore awarded each of the Named Executive Officers that percentage of their maximum potential bonus.

Stock Options

At the discretion of the Theraclone Board of Directors, in May 2013, Mr. Stocks, Dr. Ramos and Dr. Swiderek were granted 10,000, 10,000 and 7,500 options to purchase Theraclone common stock, respectively, for services performed in 2012. Each of the stock options vested and become exercisable with respect to 2.0833% of the award monthly, beginning on February 1, 2013, subject to the optionee’s provision of service to Theraclone on each vesting date. Upon the completion of the merger, each of the stock options to purchase Theraclone common stock will become options to purchase shares of PharmAthene common stock, as more fully described above in the section entitled “THE MERGER.”

Theraclone Employment Agreements

Clifford J. Stocks. Mr. Stocks was employed as Theraclone’s Chief Executive Officer under an Executive Employment Agreement dated December 2, 2011. Under his employment agreement, Mr. Stocks was entitled to receive an annual base salary of $365,000, subject to increases if approved by the Theraclone Board of Directors, and an annual cash bonus of up to 35% of his then-current base salary upon the achievement of annual corporate performance goals mutually agreed upon between Mr. Stocks and Theraclone. The Executive

193


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Employment Agreement also provided for certain additional payments in the event of Mr. Stocks separation from Theraclone or upon a change in control of Theraclone. In connection with his employment, Mr. Stocks was granted an option to purchase 1,819,447 shares of Theraclone common stock, which vested with respect to 25% of the award vested on December 1, 2012 and with respect to 2.0833% of the award, monthly thereafter. Mr. Stocks was also granted an option to purchase 909,724 shares of Theraclone common stock, which vests (i) with respect to 100% of the award upon a “change in control” of Theraclone (as defined below, and including an initial public offering of Theraclone) that is completed prior to June 2, 2015 and that results in gross proceeds to the holder of Theraclone preferred stock equal to or in excess of the total capital invested in shares of Theraclone preferred stock at the time of the change in control multiplied by ten, (ii) with respect to 75% of the award upon a change in control of Theraclone that is completed prior to June 2, 2015 and that results in gross proceeds to the holder of Theraclone preferred stock equal to or in excess of the total capital invested in shares of Theraclone preferred stock at the time of the change in control multiplied by seven and one-half and (iii) with respect to 50% of the award upon a change in control of Theraclone that is completed prior to June 2, 2015 and that results in gross proceeds to the holder of Theraclone preferred stock equal to or in excess of the total capital invested in shares of Theraclone preferred stock at the time of the change in control multiplied by five. Mr. Stocks was also eligible to receive an annual stock option to purchase up to 100,000 shares of Theraclone common stock. Upon the completion of the merger, each of Mr. Stocks’ stock options to purchase Theraclone common stock will become options to purchase shares of PharmAthene common stock, as more fully described above in the section entitled “THE MERGER.”

Under Mr. Stocks’ Executive Employment Agreement, “change in control” meant (i) a sale, conveyance, exchange or transfer (excluding any venture-backed or similar investments in Theraclone) in which any person or entity, either directly or indirectly, becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of Theraclone representing 50% of the total voting power of all its then outstanding voting securities; (ii) a merger or consolidation of Theraclone in which its voting securities immediately prior to the merger or consolidation do not represent, or are not converted into securities that represent, a majority of the voting power of all voting securities of the surviving entity immediately after the merger or consolidation; or (iii) a sale of substantially all of the assets of Theraclone or a liquidation or dissolution of Theraclone.

Eleanor Ramos, M.D. Dr. Ramos was employed as Theraclone’s Chief Medical Officer under an Executive Employment Agreement dated July 18, 2011. Under her employment agreement, Dr. Ramos was entitled to receive an annual base salary of $350,000, subject to increases if approved by the Theraclone Board of Directors, and an annual cash bonus of up to 25% of her then-current base salary upon the achievement of annual corporate performance goals mutually agreed upon between Dr. Ramos and Theraclone. The Executive Employment Agreement also provided for certain additional payments in the event of Dr. Ramos’ separation from Theraclone or upon a change in control of Theraclone. In connection with her employment, Dr. Ramos was granted an option to purchase 412,300 shares of Theraclone common stock, which vested with respect to 25% of the award vested on July 8, 2012 and with respect to 2.0833% of the award, monthly thereafter. Dr. Ramos was also eligible to receive an annual stock option to purchase up to 100,000 shares of Theraclone common stock. Upon the completion of the merger, each of Dr. Ramos’ stock options to purchase Theraclone common stock will become options to purchase shares of PharmAthene common stock, as more fully described above in the section entitled “THE MERGER.”

Kristine Swiderek, Ph.D. Dr. Swiderek was employed as Theraclone’s Chief Scientific Officer under an Executive Employment Agreement dated December 15, 2010. Under her employment agreement, Dr. Swiderek was entitled to receive an annual base salary of $230,000, subject to increases if approved by the Theraclone Board of Directors, and an annual cash bonus of up to 20% of her then-current base salary upon the achievement of annual corporate performance goals mutually agreed upon between Dr. Swiderek and Theraclone. The Executive Employment Agreement also provided for certain additional payments in the event of Dr. Swiderek’s separation from Theraclone or upon a change in control of Theraclone. In connection with her employment, Dr. Swiderek was granted an option to purchase 220,000 shares of Theraclone common stock, which vested with respect to 25% of the award vested on January 4, 2012 and with respect to 2.0833% of the award, monthly thereafter. Dr. Swiderek was also eligible to receive an annual stock option to purchase up to 75,000 shares of Theraclone common stock. Upon the completion of the merger, each of Dr. Swiderek’s

194


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

stock options to purchase Theraclone common stock will become options to purchase shares of PharmAthene common stock, as more fully described above in the section entitled “THE MERGER.”

In connection with the merger, each of these employment agreements will terminate, and Mr. Stocks, Dr. Ramos and Dr. Swiderek will enter into new employment agreements with the combined company, as further described in the section entitled “THE MERGER—Interest of Theraclone’s Directors and Executive Officers.”

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2012 Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the value of all unexercised options previously awarded to the Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2012, each of which were awarded under the Theraclone 2004 Stock Option Plan. No stock options held by any of Theraclone’s Named Executive Officers were exercised during fiscal year 2012.

       
    Option Awards(1)
     Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options (#)
Name   Exercisable   Unexercisable   Option
Exercise
Price ($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
Clifford J. Stocks
Theraclone Chief Executive Officer
    454,862       1,364,585 (2)      0.28       12/02/2021  
             909,724 (3)      0.28       12/02/2021  
Eleanor Ramos, M.D.
Theraclone Chief Medical Officer
    146,023       266,277 (4)      0.28       09/29/2021  
Kristine Swiderek, Ph.D.
Theraclone Chief Scientific Officer
    105,417       114,583 (5)      0.28       03/24/2021  
    29,641       32,219 (6)      0.28       09/29/2021  
    16,875       50,625 (7)      0.28       12/01/2021  

(1) References to options or shares held by all executive officers in the table refer to options or shares of Theraclone.
(2) These options were granted on December 2, 2011 and 25% of the award vested on December 1, 2012 and 2.0833% of the award vests monthly thereafter.
(3) These options were granted on December 2, 2011 and vest upon Theraclone’s initial public offering or a change of control, as described above in the section entitled “—Theraclone Employment Agreements.”
(4) These options were granted on September 29, 2011 and 25% of the award vested on July 8, 2012 and 2.0833% of the award vests monthly thereafter.
(5) These options were granted on March 24, 2011 and 25% of the award vested on January 4, 2012 and 2.0833% of the award vests monthly thereafter.
(6) These options were granted on September 29, 2011 and 25% of the award vested on January 4, 2012 and 2.0833% of the award vests monthly thereafter.
(7) These options were granted on December 1, 2011 and 2.0833% of the award vests monthly beginning on January 1, 2012.

Theraclone’s Director Compensation

Theraclone Director Compensation

Theraclone compensated its independent, non-employee directors through cash compensation and grants of stock options to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on its board of directors. In fiscal 2012, Theraclone had one independent, non-employee director, Wendye Robbins, who will not serve on the board of directors of the combined company. Directors who were also are employees of Theraclone or affiliated with its venture capital investors received no compensation for their service as directors or as members of board committees, other than reimbursement of business expenses incurred in connection with serving on the Theraclone Board of Directors, except for Dr. Gillis, who received cash compensation for his service as the Chairman of Theraclone’s Board of Directors and his increased responsibilities in that role. In setting director

195


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

compensation, Theraclone considered the significant amount of time that directors dedicated to the fulfillment of their director responsibilities, as well as the competency and skills required of directors.

Non-Employee Director Compensation

The following table sets forth the fiscal year 2012 compensation paid to or earned by the individuals who are expected to serve as non-employee directors of the combined company upon completion of the merger. None of the Theraclone directors who will serve as non-employee directors of the combined company upon completion of the merger received any compensation in the fiscal year 2012, except for Dr. Gillis, as described below.

Non-Employee Director Compensation Table

     
Name   Fees Earned
or Paid
In Cash(1)
  Stock
Awards($)(2)(3)
  Total($)
Steven Gillis, Ph.D.     60,000       10,091       70,091  

(1) Dr. Gillis received $60,000 per year for his service as the Chairman of Theraclone’s Board of Directors.
(2) At the discretion of Theraclone’s Board of Directors, Dr. Gillis received 60,000 stock options to purchase shares of Theraclone’s common stock at a price of $0.27/share for his service as the Chairman of Theraclone’s board of directors in fiscal 2012.
(3) The amount reported in this column represents the aggregate grant date fair value of stock options granted under Theraclone’s 2004 Stock Option Plan to its director during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 as computed in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718. The assumptions used in calculating the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes of the equity awards reported in this column are set forth in note 8 to Theraclone’s consolidated financial statements included in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation. Note that the amounts reported in this column reflect the accounting cost for these stock options, and do not correspond to the actual economic value that may be received by Dr. Gillis from the stock options.

PharmAthene’s Director Compensation

The following table sets forth the cash and non-cash compensation of PharmAthene’s directors (other than its Chief Executive Officer, who was not separately compensated for his service on the Board) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. In the paragraph following the table and in the footnotes, PharmAthene describes its standard compensation arrangement for service on the Board of Directors and board committees.

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2012

     
Name(1)   Fees earned or paid
in cash
($)(2)
  Option Awards
($)(3)
  Total
($)
John M. Gill     58,000       20,342       78,342  
Brian A. Markison     52,000       20,342       72,342  
Joel McCleary     53,000       20,342       73,342  
Jeffrey Runge     47,500       20,342       67,842  
Mitchel Sayare, Ph.D.     45,500       20,342       65,842 (4) 
Derace L. Schaffer, M.D.     47,500       20,342       67,842  
Steven St. Peter     42,500       20,342       62,842  

(1) See the Summary Compensation Table for disclosure related to compensation paid to Eric I. Richman, PharmAthene’s Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Richman did not receive any additional compensation for his service as a member of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors.
(2) Fees earned are based on membership on the Board of Directors, committee membership and leadership positions. Please refer to PharmAthene’s general policy on compensation of the members of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors below in the section entitled “QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE

196


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DISCLOSURES ABOUT THE MARKET RISK OF PHARMATHENE—General Policy Regarding Compensation of Directors.” In addition to the other compensation received, members of the Board of Directors are reimbursed for the reasonable out-of-pocket costs incurred by them in connection with travel to and from board and committee meetings. None of such reimbursements amounted to $10,000 or more in 2012, except that Dr. Sayare’s expenses incurred or paid in 2012 were $14,911. The amounts reflected in this column represent the cash fees earned by non-executive directors for services during 2012. Of these amounts, the following amounts were paid in 2013 with respect to 2012 services: Gill: $14,500, Markison: $13,000, McCleary: $13,250, Runge: $11,875, Sayare: $11,375, Schaffer: $11,875 and St. Peter: $10,625. The amounts reflected in this column do not include the following cash payments made to directors during 2012 for 2011 services: Gill: $23,087, Markison: $9,717, McCleary: $22,750, Runge: $19,875, Sayare: $20,875, Schaffer: $21,375 and St. Peter: $20,125.
(3) The amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value for stock option awards issued during 2012 computed in accordance with FAS ASC Topic 718. As of December 31, 2012, the aggregate number of option awards outstanding (vested and unvested) for Dr. Schaffer was 110,000, for Mr. Gill was 152,759, for Mr. McCleary was 162,759, for Dr. St. Peter was 20,000 (not including options to purchase 91,104 shares assigned to MPM), for Dr. Runge was 80,000, for Mr. Markison was 40,000, and for Dr. Sayare was 192,139.
(4) Does not reflect options to purchase 112,139 shares of common stock with a grant date fair value of $205,017, of which 37,380 vested during 2012. These options were granted to Dr. Sayare in 2011 and were reported in PharmAthene’s proxy statement for the 2012 annual meeting.

General Policy Regarding Compensation of Directors

For a description of PharmAthene’s general policy regarding compensation of its directors, please refer to the section entitled “THE MERGER—Interests of PharmAthene’s Directors and Officers in the Merger”

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Guidelines.  Pursuant to the DGCL and PharmAthene’s Bylaws, PharmAthene’s business, property and affairs are managed by or under the direction of its Board of Directors. Members of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors are kept informed of PharmAthene’s business through discussions with its Chief Executive Officer and its other officers, by reviewing materials provided to them and by participating in meetings of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors and its committees. PharmAthene Proposal No. 3 relates to the election of nine directors to the PharmAthene Board of Directors, with five nominees designated by PharmAthene and four nominees designated by Theraclone. For more information, please see the Section entitled “MATTERS BEING SUBMITTED TO A VOTE BY PHARMATHENE STOCKHOLDERS—PharmAthene Proposal No. 3—Election of Directors.”

Code of Ethics and Business Conduct.  PharmAthene has a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that applies to all directors, officers and employees, which can be found on PharmAthene’s website, www.pharmathene.com, under the heading “Investors” (see “Corporate Governance” — “Governance Documents”) or by writing to PharmAthene, Inc., One Park Place, Annapolis, MD 21401, c/o Corporate Secretary. All of PharmAthene’s directors, officers and employees are expected to be familiar with the Code and to adhere to those principles and procedures set forth in the Code that apply to them. PharmAthene will post any amendments to the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, as well as any waivers, that are required to be disclosed by the rules of either the SEC or the NYSE MKT, on its web site, www.pharmathene.com.

Director Independence.  PharmAthene uses the definition of “independence” under Section 803A of the NYSE MKT Company Guide, as applicable and as may be modified or supplemented from time to time, and the interpretations thereunder, to determine if the members of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors are independent. In making this determination, the PharmAthene Board of Directors considers, among other things, transactions and relationships between each director and his or her immediate family and PharmAthene, including those reported in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation in the section entitled “RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION.” The purpose of this review is to determine whether any such relationships or transactions are material and, therefore, inconsistent with a determination that the directors are independent. On the basis of such review and its understanding of such relationships and transactions, PharmAthene’s Board of Directors currently comprises and the combined company’s Board of Directors, following the merger, is expected to be comprised of at least a

197


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

majority of independent directors. The directors of the combined company immediately following the Merger are expected to be Mitchel Sayare, Ph.D., John M. Gill, Steven Gillis, Ph.D., Wende S. Hutton, Brian A. Markison, Eric I. Richman, Derace L. Schaffer, M.D., Clifford J. Stocks and                 , each of whom will be independent upon completion of the merger except for Eric I. Richman and Clifford J. Stocks.

Board of Directors Leadership Structure.  To assure effective and independent oversight of management, PharmAthene’s Board of Directors has operated and intends, following the merger, to continue to operate with the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors separated in recognition of the differences between these two roles in the management of PharmAthene. The Chairman of the Board of Directors is an independent, non-management role.

PharmAthene’s Board of Directors believes that this leadership structure provides the most effective leadership model. By permitting more effective monitoring and objective evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer’s performance, this structure increases the accountability of the Chief Executive Officer. A separation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman roles also prevents the former from controlling the Board of Directors’ agenda and information flow, thereby reducing the likelihood that the Chief Executive Officer would abuse his power.

Board of Directors Oversight of Risk Management.  PharmAthene’s Board of Directors believes that overseeing how management manages the various risks that PharmAthene faces is one of its most important responsibilities to PharmAthene’s stakeholders. PharmAthene’s Board of Directors believes that, in light of the interrelated nature of PharmAthene’s risks, oversight of risk management is ultimately the responsibility of the full Board of Directors; however, it has delegated this responsibility to the Audit Committee with respect to financial risk. The Audit Committee periodically meets with management and PharmAthene’s independent registered public accounting firm to review PharmAthene’s major financial risk exposures and the steps taken to monitor and control such exposures. PharmAthene’s Board of Directors meets regularly to discuss the strategic direction and the issues and opportunities facing the company in light of trends and developments in the biodefense industry and general business environment. Throughout the year, PharmAthene’s Board of Directors provides guidance to management regarding strategy and helps to refine the company’ operating plans to implement PharmAthene’s strategy. The involvement of the Board of Directors in setting PharmAthene’s business strategy is critical to the determination of the types and appropriate levels of risk undertaken by PharmAthene.

Board of Directors Meetings and Attendance.  It is the policy of the PharmAthene Board of Directors that directors should attend each annual meeting of stockholders and all meetings of the Board of Directors, where schedules permit.

Board of Directors Committees.  PharmAthene’s Board of Directors has a separately standing Audit Committee, Governance and Nominating Committee, Compensation Committee and Government Affairs Committee. Each Committee, with the exception of the Government Affairs Committee, consists entirely of independent, non-employee directors. The charter of each board committee (other than the Government Affairs Committee, which does not currently have a charter) is available free of charge on PharmAthene’s website, www.pharmathene.com, under the heading “Investors” (see “Corporate Governance” — “Committee Charters”) or by writing to PharmAthene, Inc., One Park Place, Annapolis, MD 21401, c/o Corporate Secretary.

198


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table below sets forth the committees, current membership of each committee and the number of committee meetings held in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

       
Name   Audit   Governance And Nominating   Compensation   Government Affairs
John M. Gill     X*                X           
Brian A. Markison                       X*           
Joel W. McCleary                       X       X*  
Jeffrey W. Runge, M.D.     X                         X  
Mitchel B. Sayare, Ph.D.              X*       X           
Derace L. Schaffer, M.D.     X       X                    
Steven St. Peter, M.D.              X                    
Total 2012 Meetings     4       1       3       0  

* Committee Chairperson.

The Board of Directors of the combined company will re-evaluate committee membership after completion of the merger and expects each member of the combined company’s committees to be independent.

The primary functions of each of the board committees are described below.

Audit Committee.  The primary functions of the Audit Committee are to: review the professional services and independence of PharmAthene’s independent registered public accounting firm and PharmAthene’s accounts, procedures and internal controls; appoint (subject to stockholder approval) the firm selected to be PharmAthene’s independent registered public accounting firm; review and approve the scope of the annual audit; review and evaluate with the independent registered public accounting firm PharmAthene’s annual audit and annual consolidated financial statements; review with management the status of internal accounting controls; evaluate problem areas having a potential financial impact on PharmAthene that may be brought to the Audit Committee’s attention by management, the independent registered public accounting firm or the Board of Directors; and evaluate all of PharmAthene’s public financial reporting documents.

The current members of PharmAthene’s Audit Committee each meet the independence criteria for directors set forth under the rules of the NYSE MKT and the additional independence criteria for members of audit committees specified in Section 803B of the NYSE MKT Company Guide and Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. Each member of PharmAthene’s Audit Committee is financially literate under the current listing standards of the NYSE MKT. PharmAthene’s Board of Directors has determined that John M. Gill, the Chairman of the Audit Committee, qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as such term is defined by SEC rules.

Governance and Nominating Committee.  The current members of PharmAthene’s Governance and Nominating Committee are “independent” as required by Section 804 of the NYSE MKT Company Guide.

The primary functions of the Governance and Nominating Committee are to: review and make recommendations on the range of skills and expertise which should be represented on the Board of Directors, and the eligibility criteria for individual Board of Directors and committee membership; review and recommend to the Board of Directors the appropriate structure of the Board of Directors; identify individuals qualified to become Board of Directors members and recommend to the Board of Directors the nominees for election to the Board of Directors at the next annual meeting of stockholders; implement a policy and procedures with regard to consideration of any director candidate recommended by stockholders; retain and terminate any search firm to be used to identify director candidates, and to approve the search firm, fees and other retention terms; and review and recommend to the Board of Directors the appropriate structure of Board of Directors committees, committee assignments and chair person of the board and each committee.

Among the factors the Governance and Nominating Committee considers when determining persons to be nominated include whether such individuals are actively engaged in business endeavors, have an understanding of financial statements, corporate budgeting and capital structure, are familiar with the

199


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

requirements of a publicly traded company, are familiar with industries relevant to PharmAthene’s business endeavors, are willing to devote significant time to the oversight duties of the Board of Directors of a public company, and are able to promote a diversity of views based on the person’s education, experience and professional employment. The Governance and Nominating Committee evaluates each individual in the context of the board as a whole, with the objective of recommending a group of persons that can best implement PharmAthene’s business plan, perpetuate PharmAthene’s business and represent stockholder interests. The Governance and Nominating Committee may require certain skills or attributes, such as financial or accounting experience, to meet specific board needs that arise from time to time.

PharmAthene is of the view that the continuing service of qualified incumbents promotes stability and continuity in the board room, contributing to the ability of the Board of Directors to work as a collective body, while giving PharmAthene the benefit of the familiarity and insight into PharmAthene’s affairs that its directors have accumulated during their tenure. Accordingly, the process of the Governance and Nominating Committee for identifying nominees reflects PharmAthene’s practice of re-nominating incumbent directors who continue to satisfy the Governance and Nominating Committee’s criteria for membership on the Board of Directors, whom the Governance and Nominating Committee believes continue to make important contributions to the Board of Directors and who consent to continue their service on the Board of Directors. The Governance and Nominating Committee will identify and/or solicit recommendations for new candidates when there is no qualified and available incumbent.

The Governance and Nominating Committee will consider nominees recommended by stockholders. There are no differences in the manner in which the committee evaluates nominees for director based on whether the nominee is recommended by a stockholder. Stockholders who would like to have PharmAthene’s Governance and Nominating Committee consider their recommendations for nominees for the position of director, should submit their recommendations, in accordance with the procedures set forth below, in writing to: Corporate Secretary, PharmAthene, Inc., One Park Place, Annapolis, MD 21401.

For nominations, a stockholder’s notice must include: (i) as to each person whom the stockholder proposes to nominate for election as a director, (A) the name, age, business address and residential address of such person, (B) the principal occupation or employment of such person, (C) the class and number of shares of stock of PharmAthene that are beneficially owned by such person, (D) any other information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors or is otherwise required by the rules and regulations of the SEC promulgated under the Exchange Act, and (E) the written consent of the nominee to be named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected and (ii) as to the stockholder giving the notice, (A) the name, business address, and residential address, as they appear on PharmAthene’s stock transfer books, of the nominating stockholder, (B) a representation that the nominating stockholder is a stockholder of record and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the person or persons specified in the notice, (C) the class and number of shares of stock of PharmAthene beneficially owned by the nominating stockholder and (D) a description of all arrangements or understandings between the nominating stockholder and each nominee and any other person or persons (naming such person or persons) pursuant to which the nomination or nominations are to be made by the nominating stockholder.

Compensation Committee.  The current members of PharmAthene’s Compensation Committee are “independent” as required by Section 805 of the NYSE MKT Company Guide.

PharmAthene’s executive compensation program is administered by the Compensation Committee. Each member of the committee qualifies as an outside director within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Internal Revenue Code. The primary functions of the Compensation Committee are to: consider, recommend, oversee and implement executive compensation plans, policies and programs; review the performance and determine the compensation of PharmAthene’s executive officers and directors, including the negotiation of any employment agreements with such persons, oversight and administration of the 2007 Plan and the grant of options and awards under the 2007 Plan. Pursuant to Section 805 of the NYSE MKT Company Guide, compensation of PharmAthene’s Chief Executive Officer is determined, or recommended to the Board of Directors for determination, by the Compensation Committee comprised solely of independent directors. The Chief Executive Officer is not present during voting or

200


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

deliberations. Compensation for all other officers is determined, or recommended to the Board of Directors for determination, by the Compensation Committee comprised solely of independent directors.

Under the Compensation Committee Charter, PharmAthene’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chairman of the Board of Directors may recommend to the Compensation Committee individual compensation awards for its officers. The Compensation Committee would then have to review the recommendation and make its own recommendation to the Board of Directors.

Government Affairs Committee.  The primary functions of the Government Affairs Committee are to: oversee and review the status of government initiatives relating to funding and appropriations for the purchase of therapeutics and prophylactics for biological and chemical weapons and other threats to the population and to advise the Board of Directors on other governmental considerations in the Board of Directors’ deliberations and decision-making processes.

Process for Communicating with Board of Directors Members.  Interested parties may communicate with any and all members PharmAthene’s Board of Directors by transmitting correspondence addressed to one or more directors by name at the following address: PharmAthene, Inc., One Park Place, Annapolis, MD 21401, c/o Corporate Secretary. Communications from PharmAthene’s stockholders to one or more directors will be collected and organized by PharmAthene’s Corporate Secretary and will be forwarded to the Chairman of the Board of Directors or to the identified director(s) as soon as practicable. If multiple communications are received on a similar topic, the Corporate Secretary may, in his or her discretion, forward only representative correspondence.

The Chairman of the Board of Directors will determine whether any communication addressed to the entire Board of Directors should be properly addressed by the entire Board of Directors or a committee thereof. If a communication is sent to the Board of Directors or a committee, the Chairman of the Board of Directors or the Chairman of that committee, as the case may be, will determine whether a response to the communication is warranted.

201


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

THERACLONE’S BUSINESS

Overview

Theraclone Sciences, Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company focused on the discovery and development of novel, monoclonal antibody therapeutics for diseases that are devastating for patients and their families and which are a significant threat to human health. Theraclone leverages its proprietary antibody discovery technology, I-STARTM (In-Situ Therapeutic Antibody Rescue), to identify rare human antibodies that may be developed into antibody product candidates that are potentially safer and more effective than current therapies. Theraclone has a portfolio of innovative antibodies in clinical and preclinical development targeting serious medical conditions with a significant unmet medical need and with a primary focus on infectious disease and cancer.

Theraclone’s I-STAR technology enables discovery of fully human antibodies from human subjects that Theraclone believes have significant advantages over antibodies that are discovered with other methods, for example, antibodies discovered using animal immunization technologies or antibodies generated without undergoing natural maturation processes in humans. The ability to discover therapeutic antibody candidates directly from humans has been long sought. Isolation of such antibodies from human sources, however, has historically been difficult and inefficient. Theraclone’s I-STAR antibodies are affinity matured in the human immune system. Affinity maturation refers to the process by which B-cells produce antibodies with increased affinity for the corresponding antigens during the course of an immune response. Theraclone’s I-STAR antibodies are highly specific to their targets, presenting minimal risk of undesired immune response and thus providing a significant safety benefit in clinical settings when a drug is required to be administered repeatedly or chronically. As a treatment for infectious diseases, Theraclone believes that human antibodies can provide immediate immunity, which is particularly important for immuno-compromised, elderly and pediatric patients who have weak or immature immune systems.

Antibodies can act through a variety of mechanisms of actions. For example, when an antibody binds to a target, the pathogenic property of the target can either be directly inhibited or blocked (e.g. neutralizing antibody), or the bound antibody can direct other components of the immune system to eliminate it (non-neutralizing, protective antibody). The latter is also referred to as “antibody effector function mediated immunity.” Either mechanism of action that an antibody uses, neutralization or effector function, can protect against development or progression of disease. Upon binding to their specific target, some antibodies are internalized into the cell interior (internalizing antibodies). Such antibodies can be linked or conjugated to a toxin to deliver the toxin specifically into the target cell. In oncology, Theraclone’s technology can identify human antibodies that are internalized by tumor cells and, therefore, may offer an approach to deliver therapeutic payloads as antibody-drug based conjugates targeting cancer cells.

Theraclone’s strategy is to:

advance clinical development of its lead product candidates, TCN-032 and TCN-202;
utilize the I-STAR technology and its antibody discovery capabilities to identify new product candidates;
form strategic alliances to help fund research and development operations and accelerate the development of its product candidates; and
pursue funding through partnerships with the U.S. government.

Theraclone has advanced two infectious disease product candidates into Phase 2 clinical development:

TCN-032.  Theraclone’s flu antibody, TCN-032, is a recombinant fully human monoclonal antibody for the treatment of patients hospitalized with serious influenza. TCN-032 targets all known seasonal, pandemic and highly-pathogenic influenza A virus strains. Theraclone has completed a placebo controlled proof-of-concept Phase 2a viral challenge clinical study of TCN-032 in human volunteers, which, while not meeting its primary endpoint, nevertheless demonstrated reductions in clinical symptoms and viral shedding. As of August 31, 2013, Theraclone had dosed 59 subjects in Phase 1 and Phase 2a clinical studies of TCN-032. Theraclone is currently planning a dose ranging Phase 2 clinical study in patients with uncomplicated seasonal flu, as well as a Phase 2a safety study

202


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

in patients hospitalized with serious influenza. Please refer to the section entitled “Theraclone’s Business — Theraclone’s Strategy — Flu Antibody Drug Candidate TCN-032 — TCN-032 Clinical Development Program” for further details on this product candidate, including the concluded Phase 2a study.
TCN-202.  Theraclone’s cytomegalovirus, or CMV, antibody, TCN-202, is a recombinant fully human monoclonal antibody for the treatment and prevention of CMV infections. Theraclone has completed a Phase 1 clinical safety study of TCN-202, which generated data showing that this product candidate was safe, well-tolerated, not immunogenic and had a pharmacokinetic profile consistent with a human antibody. Theraclone began a proof-of-concept Phase 2a clinical trial in kidney transplant patients in August 2013. Study data are projected to be reported in the third quarter of 2014.

Theraclone is also working to identify additional fully human antibodies to expand its discovery pipeline of potential product candidates targeting infectious disease and oncology indications.

Each of Theraclone’s product candidates and all potential product candidates were discovered internally using I-STAR technology.

Market for Antibodies as Therapeutics

Antibody-based therapeutics, principally monoclonal antibodies, are one of the most important segments of the biologics market. The overall market for monoclonal antibody-based products is expected to grow at an estimated compounded annual growth rate of 6%, reaching over $110 billion by 2023, according to a 2013 market analysis conducted by Visiongain. As of 2012, at least 30 antibody products have been approved by regulatory authorities in the United States and Europe, and, according to a 2010 statistical analysis by Tufts University, more than 300 monoclonal antibodies are in various stages of clinical development.

Despite the large number of therapeutic antibodies in development and on the market, the need for more effective and safer drugs remains high, and indications in oncology and infectious disease continue to represent areas of high unmet medical need.

Theraclone’s Strategy

Theraclone’s goal is to become a leading biopharmaceutical company focused on the development of innovative monoclonal antibody therapeutics to address serious unmet medical needs in the indications of infectious disease and cancer. The key elements of Theraclone’s strategy are:

Advance clinical development of Theraclone’s lead product candidates.  Theraclone intends to focus its resources on advancing the clinical development of its two lead product candidates, TCN-032 and TCN-202, which are both in Phase 2 clinical development.
Utilize the I-STAR technology and Theraclone’s antibody discovery expertise to identify new product candidates.  To add additional fully human antibodies to its discovery pipeline and facilitate additional discovery collaborations, Theraclone is leveraging its I-STAR technology and its antibody discovery expertise to identify potential product candidates that are potentially safer and more effective than the current standard of care.
Form strategic alliances to help fund research and development operations and accelerate the development of its product candidates.  Theraclone has formed strategic collaborations with Zenyaku Kogyo, Pfizer and International Aids Vaccine Initiative, or IAVI, to obtain funding to expand its discovery pipeline and advance its product candidates. Theraclone intends to continue to pursue additional strategic collaborations with leading pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and as a part of any arrangement expects to maintain a share of the commercialization rights.
Pursue funding through partnerships with the U.S. Government.  Theraclone intends to continue to pursue funding from the U.S. government, including the Department of Health and Human Services, or DHHS, and the Department of Defense. Theraclone’s product candidate, TCN-032, is being developed to treat influenza, a key U.S. government public health priority, which may result in U.S. government funding. Theraclone believes that its I-STAR technology platform can generate additional product candidates to address other U.S. government priorities.

203


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Products Under Development

The following table provides information about Theraclone’s products under development:

[GRAPHIC MISSING]

(1) As part of the collaboration with IAVI, a large panel of anti-HIV monoclonal antibodies that recognize novel epitopes have been identified. IAVI is pursuing vaccine development and is investigating these epitopes to potentially inform and guide vaccine design against HIV. Theraclone has retained the rights to use the anti-HIV monoclonal antibodies therapeutically, and its aim is to identify a licensee.
(2) Pfizer is responsible for preclinical and clinical development of the antibodies under this collaboration. Theraclone is eligible to receive royalties on net sales of any developed products and research funding and milestone payments upon the achievement of discovery, development, regulatory and commercialization milestones. These milestone payments are contingent upon the successful achievement of specified development activities such as clinical trial initiation or regulatory activities based upon Pfizer’s performance.

Flu Antibody Drug Candidate TCN-032

Overview

Theraclone is developing a recombinant fully human monoclonal antibody, TCN-032, for the treatment of patients hospitalized with severe influenza A infection and as a stockpiled product for preventative and therapeutic treatment options in the event of pandemic flu outbreaks. The influenza A virus continually evolves, and therefore can form resistance to antiviral drugs, making it difficult to develop drugs or vaccines that provide lasting protection against, or treatment for, influenza A infections. TCN-032, however, recognizes and binds to an epitope of the virus protein M2 that is present in virtually all influenza A virus strains. According to the National Center for Biotechnology Information’s database and Theraclone’s internal studies, this epitope is present and has remained unchanged in over 99% of the influenza A virus strains reported. As a result, Theraclone believes that TCN-032 may offer universal, broad-spectrum efficacy through a novel mechanism of action against all influenza A virus strains, including the new avian H7N9 strain, future pandemic strains or other drug-resistant strains. Theraclone has completed a Phase 1 clinical study and a Phase 2a viral challenge study, both confirming the safety of TCN-032. While the Phase 2a study did not meet its pre-specified primary endpoint, the overall data support an anti-influenza effect, providing the impetus to proceed to clinical studies in patients with natural infection.

Market Opportunities

Influenza A infections continue to be one of the most prevalent, devastating and economically impactful viral diseases in the United States and the rest of the world. According to the World Health Organization, or the WHO, in the last century alone, there have been three global influenza pandemics, among them the so-called “Spanish flu” of 1918 – 1919, which was the single most devastating disease outbreak in human history and was believed to have caused between 20 million and 50 million deaths worldwide. Due to

204


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

continuous challenges of vaccine design and production, as well as the prevalence of viral resistance to the drugs currently available, new and more effective preventative treatments and therapies are urgently needed. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the CDC data, in the United States alone, 5% to 20% of the population is infected with influenza each year. Additionally, in 2009, the WHO reported that worldwide, annual flu epidemics resulted in about three to five million cases of severe illness, and about 250,000 to 500,000 deaths.

Hospitalized Flu.   According to the DHHS, in 2009, the sum of all costs for all hospital stays of patients with a principal diagnosis of influenza totaled $2.1 billion, which excludes patients with influenza but coded with a different principal diagnosis. The study finds that flu related death rates in the elderly have been increasing over the past decade and projects this to worsen due to an aging population. The initial proposed indication for TCN-032 is for the treatment of severe influenza A infections in hospitalized patients, with an aim to lessen the severity of the infection and the social-economic impact associated with lengthy hospital stays. According to the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the hospital stay for these patients is typically four to nine days, with longer stays frequently associated with the elderly. Due to the lack of approved drugs for the treatment of hospitalized influenza and the potential of TCN-032 to reduce the length of hospital stays, Theraclone believes the worldwide market for TCN-032 could be significant.

Pandemic Flu.  According to the WHO, one of the risks to public health is the emergence of new influenza A viruses for which the general population lacks immunity, leading to high infection rates, rapid spread of disease and a global pandemic with high morbidity and mortality rates. The concern for such risk was renewed and is exemplified by the new avian H7N9 strain of the influenza A virus in China, which is considered a latent pandemic threat with a mortality rate of over 20%, according to a 2013 report by the CDC. TCN-032 is a novel, broad-spectrum therapy that could be stockpiled to support the U.S. National Strategy for Pandemic Influenza and the Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprises strategy.

Current Treatments

According to the CDC, as advised by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, annual vaccinations against influenza are the best option to prevent influenza infection and reduce the severity of the disease. However, the annual selection of the appropriate vaccine strains presents many challenges and can delay the production of an appropriate vaccine, frequently resulting in sub-optimal protection.

Several small molecules drugs are presently licensed in the United States for the treatment or prevention of influenza. The following table describes the currently marketed therapies for influenza:

       
Drug   Company   Generic Name   Class of Drug   Indication
Tamiflu®   Roche   Oseltamivir   Neuraminidase
inhibitors
  Treatment of patients one year
and older, symptomatic for
less than two days;
prophylaxis in patients one
year and older
Relenza®   Glaxo-Smithkline   Zanamivir   Neuraminidase
inhibitors
  Treatment of patients seven
years and older, symptomatic
for less than two days;
prophylaxis in patients five
years and older
Symmetrel®   Endo Pharma   Amantadine   Adamantane   Prophylaxis and treatment of
influenza A infection
Flumadine®   Forest Labs   Rimantadine   Adamantane   Prophylaxis and treatment of
influenza A infection

According to the FDA, many of the circulating flu virus strains are resistant to Symmetrel and Flumadine, and the CDC has not recommended the use of these two drugs for recently circulating influenza viruses. Of the neuraminidase inhibitors, Tamiflu is the preferred antiviral treatment. Relenza is only available

205


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

in an inhaled formulation, and administration of inhaled medications to severely ill patients who have multiple co-existing respiratory medical conditions or who are on mechanical ventilation is generally avoided due to risk of bronchoconstriction.

Clinical use of these drugs has led to the emergence of fully-viable resistant viruses and the utility of these drugs is further limited by a short therapeutic window. For example, Tamiflu’s beneficial effect on reducing the duration of influenza illness is optimal when administered within the first 48 hours of the onset of symptoms. Furthermore, it is noted that despite the widespread use of Tamiflu for over 14 years, there continues to be a lack of evidence in reducing hospitalizations due to influenza infection, according to an article published in 2013 in the British Medical Journal. The urgent need for a more effective therapy is reflected by the DHHS and BARDA’s current Broad Agency Announcement for the Advanced Development of Medical Countermeasures for Pandemic Influenza. The development of new, potent antiviral drugs for the prevention and treatment of influenza continues to be a high priority to public health. Theraclone believes that the development of TCN-032, which is anticipated to broadly target influenza A viruses with a mechanism of action that is effective against drug resistant viruses, represents a more desirable approach for the treatment of influenza that can also complement the use of currently marketed drugs.

TCN-032 Preclinical Activity Summary

TCN-032 offers a mechanism of action that may be well-suited to target influenza A. Theraclone’s preclinical studies have demonstrated that upon the binding of TCN-032 to the influenza A virus and cells that are infected by the influenza A virus, the TCN-032 antibody can activate immune defense mechanisms. Specifically, when TCN-032 binds to infected cells, it can act as a bridge by binding and activating specific immune cells that are programmed specifically to eliminate and kill the infected cells. This process is also referred to as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Theraclone’s studies have demonstrated that TCN-032 can also act through a process referred to as complement-dependent cytotoxicity, in which the binding of TCN-032 to an infected cell tags the cell for destruction by components of the infected person’s immune system. TCN-032 may also act through other mechanisms to eliminate the virus from the human host, including antibody-dependent destruction of the virus (virolysis) and antibody-dependent clearance of infected cells by phagocytes, which are cells that protect the body by ingesting harmful foreign particles (opsonophagocytosis).

In preclinical studies, TCN-032 protected mice from lethal viral challenge and reduced the spread of viruses to other organ systems. In contrast to oseltamivir (Tamiflu®), TCN-032 protected mice from lethal challenge even when administered past 48 hours of infection and demonstrated an additive benefit when used together with oseltamivir. A toxicity study in rats generated data showing that TCN-032 was safe after both single and repeat dose administration. A human tissue cross-reactivity study generated data demonstrating high specificity for the intended viral target, with no binding to human tissues. Based on preclinical findings, Theraclone believes that TCN-032 could offer universal, broad-spectrum efficacy through a novel mechanism of action against influenza A infections.

TCN-032 Clinical Development Program

Theraclone completed a Phase 1 clinical study of TCN-032 in early 2012. This study was a single, ascending dose study testing five single dose levels of TCN-032 ranging from a low dose of 1 mg/kg to the highest dose of 40 mg/kg (1, 3, 10, 20 and 40 mg/kg) administered intravenously to healthy volunteers. TCN-032 was well tolerated, with no dose limiting toxicities or serious adverse events reported. Most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity and deemed unrelated to TCN-032. There was no apparent dose relationship between treatment-emergent adverse events and TCN-032 administration. Pharmacokinetic (the study of absorption, metabolism and action of drugs) evaluation indicated a terminal half-life of approximately 15 days and no anti-drug antibodies were detected.

In the first half of 2013, Theraclone completed a Phase 2a clinical study evaluating the safety and efficacy of TCN-032 in a human influenza A viral challenge. As this was the first clinical study of TCN-032 in humans with the influenza A infection, the study was conducted in a controlled setting in which the pattern and kinetics of influenza A infection (both clinical symptom scores and viral load) with a specific viral strain are well characterized. The clinical study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in which healthy subjects were challenged with influenza A virus (Day 0) to which they were not previously exposed.

206


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Twenty-four hours following the nasal virus inoculation (Day 1), 61 subjects were randomized, of whom 60 received intravenously administered study drug, TCN-032 at a dose of 40 mg/kg, or placebo. A total of 48 subjects met the definition of laboratory-confirmed infection (TCN-032, n=24 and placebo n=24) defined as those who demonstrated viral shedding or seroconversion.

The primary endpoint for this study was the proportion of subjects who developed any grade 2 or greater influenza symptom or fever, from Day 1 to Day 7. The evaluation of the primary endpoint showed a numerical decrease in TCN-032 treated subjects but was not statistically significant. However, TCN-032-treated subjects showed a 35% reduction (p=0.0466, Wilcoxon rank-sum test) in the median clinical symptoms score severity time curve (Day 1-7).

       
Clinical Symptoms   TCN-032 (n=24)   Placebo (n=24)   % Difference   p value (one-sided)
Proportion of subjects with |LX Grade 2 symptoms of pyrexia   10/24=41.2%   13/24=54.2%   12.5%   p=0.21, CMH test
AUC (Day 1 – 7) median   25.5   39   35%   p=0.0466, Wilcoxon

A plot of each individual total clinical symptom score (Day 1-7) in TCN-032 and placebo treated subjects who demonstrated viral shedding or seroconversion, from lowest to highest total score is shown in the graph below, and support the benefit of TCN-032 treatment in mitigating influenza clinical symptoms.

[GRAPHIC MISSING]

With regard to the choice of the primary endpoint, Theraclone believed a clinical endpoint, as opposed to a viral endpoint, was more suited to TCN-032’s non-neutralizing, effector-mediated mechanism of action and was also well suited for the first test of a monoclonal antibody in a human viral challenge model. Theraclone only had historical rates for the proportion of placebo subjects who would be expected to meet this endpoint in order to estimate sample size and, therefore, chose grade 2 or higher symptoms as the primary clinical endpoint. The primary endpoint was not achieved, in part because a single grade 2 event in a subject who might have had a minimal cumulative influenza score (e.g. <10) could meet the primary endpoint, yet another subject who had a high cumulative influenza score (e.g., >100) and was quite ill with classic influenza symptoms did not meet the primary endpoint because no single symptom was severe enough to meet grade 2 scoring.

With regard to viral shedding, TCN-032 treatment led to a 2.2 log reduction in median viral load under the curve, or AUC, (Day 2-7) by qPCR (p=0.095, Wilcoxon rank-sum test) compared to the placebo-treated subjects. TCN-032 was safe and well tolerated, with no increase in adverse events compared to the placebo. In addition, the half-life of TCN-032 was consistent with the Phase 1 study results (approximately 16 days) with no anti-drug antibodies detected. These results are consistent with the intended objective of TCN-032, which is to complement antiviral drugs, extend the therapeutic window and be effective against all strains of influenza, including drug-resistant strains. Considering the totality of the study results, Theraclone believes the

207


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

results generated promising evidence of a benefit in reductions in total clinical scores and viral load, which it believes provides biologic proof of efficacy. A composite graph of the median daily clinical score and median viral load (by PCR) in TCN-032 and placebo subjects is shown below.

[GRAPHIC MISSING]

The results of this study represent the first demonstration that a monoclonal antibody therapeutic may provide immediate immunity and therapeutic benefit in influenza A infection, with no apparent emergence of resistant virus.

Theraclone expects to conduct a Phase 2a safety study in hospitalized patients and a Phase 2b dose-ranging study in patients with uncomplicated influenza to identify a safe and effective dose. Theraclone expects to follow these studies with a pivotal program that it anticipates will focus on the treatment of patients hospitalized with influenza A infection.

CMV Antibody Drug Candidate: TCN-202

Overview

Theraclone is developing a recombinant fully human monoclonal antibody, TCN-202, for the treatment of CMV infection. Theraclone has completed a Phase 1 clinical study and, in August 2013, initiated a Phase 2a clinical study in solid organ transplant patients designed to generate proof of concept efficacy data. Study data are projected to be reported in the third-quarter of 2014.

Market Opportunity

Solid Organ Transplant Indication.  According to Global Data, the market for prophylactic and therapeutic CMV drugs in solid organ and stem cell transplants is estimated to grow from $726 million in 2012 to $1.1 billion in 2019. Additionally, Global Industry Analysts noted that there were approximately 28,000 solid organ transplant procedures in the United States and the number of procedures is expected to grow to 33,000 by 2017. Worldwide, the Global Observatory on Donation & Transplantation in collaboration with the WHO, reported over 112,000 solid organs were transplanted in 2011, representing approximately a 5% increase compared to procedures performed in 2010. The procedures include kidney, liver, heart, lung, pancreas and small intestine. Transplant patients at highest risk for CMV disease are those who have not previously been infected with CMV, referred to as CMV recipient negative (R-), who receive their transplant organ from a donor who has previously been infected with CMV, referred to as CMV donor positive (D+). According to 2008 and 2009 articles published in the American Journal of Transplantation, these organ transplant recipients comprise about 20% of all organ transplant procedures and have an approximately 70% chance of CMV infection resulting from their transplant procedure. Transplant patients that have previously had a CMV infection and receive a transplant organ from a donor who has also previously had a CMV infection have approximately a 65% chance of CMV reactivation or re-infection. Theraclone believes that patients in this latter category may also be candidates for preventative treatment of TCN-202.

208


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Congenital Infection Indication.  There is a significant risk that women who become infected with CMV for the first time during pregnancy will pass the virus on to the fetus (congenital CMV infection). According to a 2009 report by CDC, each year, approximately 30,000 children born in the United States have congenital CMV infection and reports indicate a range of 50 to nearly 400 fatal cases due to congenital CMV. 5,000 to 8,000 children born each year in the United States suffer from permanent hearing loss, intellectual disability, psychomotor delay, speech and language disabilities, behavioral disorders or visual impairment due to CMV infection. Approved treatment options for children born with congenital CMV infections do not exist, and Theraclone believes that prevention of congenital CMV infection represents a significant unmet medical need that could be addressed by treating pregnant women diagnosed with primary CMV infection during pregnancy with monthly administration of TCN-202.

Current Treatments

The most commonly employed preventative antiviral drugs for the treatment of CMV infection in solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplants are ganciclovir and valganciclovir, with foscarvir and cidofovir as second-line treatments. All four drugs exhibit potentially serious adverse effects, including a reduction of blood cells (myelosuppression) that results in diminished immune function and a toxic effect on the kidneys (nephrotoxicity). As an alternative to these antiviral drugs, human blood-derived anti-CMV immunoglobulin has shown promise in the prevention of CMV infection associated with solid organ transplants. Additionally, Cytogam® (Human Cytomegalovirus Immune Globulin Intravenous; CSL Behring) and Cytotect® (Human Cytomegalovirus Immunoglobulin; Biotest Pharma) are used for preventative treatment in various solid organ transplant indications. The results of clinical studies have shown approximately a 40% reduction in CMV infections in renal transplant patients when given Cytogam® or Cytotect®. However, these human blood-derived drugs are subject to unpredictable supply and carry the risk of transmission of other infectious disease to transplant patients.

Treatment of pregnant women with primary CMV infection using currently available antiviral drugs is limited due to the potential for serious adverse effects, including harming development of the fetus, causing deleterious alteration in the genetic material of the embryo and the fetus, and causing cancer (referred to as teratogenicity, genotoxicity and carcinogenicity, respectively), in addition to those noted above. Treatment of congenitally infected infants with neurologic symptoms diagnosed at birth with ganciclovir has been shown to decrease the rate of neurologic deterioration and hearing loss in a randomized study, but was complicated by a significant decrease in white blood cells (grade 3/4 neutropenia) observed in 63% of treated infants. Cytogam® and Cytotect® are also currently being investigated as an approach to prevent congenital CMV infection and may provide an acceptable safety profile. Preliminary study data suggest these products have the potential to be safe and effective in preventing congenital CMV infection when administered to women diagnosed with a primary CMV infection during early pregnancy. However, as with transplant patients, human blood-derived drugs carry the risk of transmitting other infectious disease to the mother and fetus.

Theraclone believes the promising effects of blood-derived anti-CMV immunoglobulin in both the transplant and congenital infection indications support the hypothesis that monoclonal antibodies that target important CMV epitopes will be valuable therapeutic drugs in these indications.

TCN-202 Preclinical Activity Summary

TCN-202 is a recombinant fully human monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to the AD-2 epitope of the gB protein on the surface of CMV. The gB protein is important for the fusion of the virus to host cells and thus inhibition of this process is critical for prevention of infection. Preclinical studies of TCN-202 have demonstrated:

specificity to the intended viral target;
effective neutralization of CMV in cells susceptible to infection by CMV, including dermal fibroblasts, placental fibroblasts, trophoblast progenitor cells, primary cytotrophoblasts, endothelial cells and epithelial cells;
inhibition of cell-to-cell viral spread and CMV-mediated fusion of infected cells with neighboring uninfected cells, even when added post-infection;

209


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

100-fold (added therapeutically) and 1000-fold (added prophylactically) greater potency blocking CMV infection of human placenta tissue sections, as compared to human blood-derived anti-CMV immuneglobulin; and
no evidence of toxicity following repeat dose administration in rats.

During the course of development, therapeutic antibody product candidates are routinely assessed for any potential binding to tissue or cell structures other than their target. During nonclinical testing, using a large panel of organ tissues from multiple species, TCN-202 displayed some binding to human, monkey and dog superficial skin tissues. In subsequent nonclinical toxicology testing, there was no evidence of toxicity, including skin reactions, following repeat dose administration in cynomolgus monkeys. Furthermore, Phase 1 study in human testing did not show any skin related adverse events.

TCN-202 Clinical Development Program

In the first half of 2013, Theraclone completed a Phase 1 clinical study of TCN-202. This study was a dose escalation study in healthy adult volunteers conducted in two parts: a single ascending dose component ranging from a low dose of 1 mg/kg to the highest dose of 50 mg/kg (1, 3, 10, 30 and 50 mg/kg) and a multiple ascending dose component in which 2 doses of 15 mg/kg each were administered 14 days apart to the same subjects. It was designed to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of single and multiple ascending intravenous doses of TCN-202. Forty-eight adult subjects were enrolled in six dose cohorts (eight subjects per cohort, of which six were treated with TCN-202 and two were given placebo). The subjects were monitored for up to 60 days after infusion with TCN-202. In the study, TCN-202 was well tolerated. Adverse events were mild or moderate in severity and most were unrelated to TCN-202. Pharmacokinetic evaluation indicated a terminal half-life of approximately 14 days. No anti-drug antibodies were detected following dosing with TCN-202.

In August 2013, Theraclone began a Phase 2a proof-of-concept study in solid organ transplantation. In this study, Theraclone intends to enroll up to 20 renal allograft recipients who are CMV seronegative and receiving a kidney from a CMV seropositive donor. These patients are expected to receive six doses of TCN-202 during the first ten weeks post-transplant and to be observed for 12 months post-transplant. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of TCN-202 on prevention of CMV infection during the first three months post-transplant.

Following the Phase 2a clinical study, Theraclone anticipates that a Phase 2b dose-ranging clinical study will be conducted to determine a safe and effective dose of TCN-202 in recipients of solid organ transplants. Safety and efficacy data in transplant patients and additional non-clinical studies are anticipated to be necessary to support the development path in the prevention of congenital infection during pregnancy.

Orphan Drug Designation

Theraclone sought and the FDA granted in January 2011 an Orphan Drug Designation, or ODD, in the United States for TCN-202 for prevention of congenital CMV infection following primary CMV infection in pregnant women. An ODD entitles Theraclone to a seven-year exclusive marketing period in the United States for TCN-202 for congenital CMV infection, except where another treatment shows clinical superiority to the product with orphan drug exclusivity in that it is determined to be safer, more effective or makes a major contribution to patient care. Orphan drug exclusivity does not prevent the FDA from approving a different biologic for the same disease or condition, or the same biologic for a different disease or condition.

Discovery Programs

In addition to Theraclone’s two clinical product candidates, TCN-032 and TCN-202, Theraclone intends to add product candidates to its pipeline through its discovery programs in the infectious disease and oncology indications.

As part of its influenza research program, Theraclone has discovered a panel of broadly-neutralizing anti-influenza A infection monoclonal antibodies that neutralize the virus through a mechanism of action different from that of TCN-032. Theraclone is considering testing these antibodies in combination with TCN-032 as follow-on drug development efforts in its influenza program.

210


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In collaboration with IAVI, Theraclone has discovered a large panel of broadly neutralizing and highly potent anti-HIV monoclonal antibodies that recognize novel epitopes present in a broad range of viruses in circulation. IAVI is investigating these epitopes to potentially inform and guide vaccine design against HIV. The antibodies may be useful as therapeutic drug candidates to treat HIV infections, such as in patients resistant to existing drugs. Theraclone’s aim is to identify a licensee for the therapeutic use of these monoclonal antibodies. For more information about Theraclone’s collaboration with IAVI, see “— Collaborations — IAVI” below.

Theraclone has also initiated a program for the discovery and development of fully human antibodies for prevention and treatment of infections caused by Klebsiella pneumonia, or Kp, which is an opportunistic gram negative bacteria that typically affects the critically ill or patients with weakened immune systems and can cause pneumonia, complicated urinary tract and wound infections and bacteremia. Mechanically ventilated patients and those affected by chronic respiratory disease, diabetes, liver disease and chronic alcoholism are at high risk for acquiring Kp infections in the hospital and long term care settings. While antibiotics typically are effective for treating bacterial infections, in the United States, mortality rates of up to 50% for infections with drug resistant Kp strains have been reported, according to the National Institute of Health. Due to the rising concern of growing multi-drug resistance in bacteria, serious bacterial infections including those caused by Kp represent a significant unmet medical need.

In addition, Theraclone is initiating a program for the discovery of monoclonal antibody candidates and novel target antigens suitable for the treatment of Her2-negative and triple negative (Her2-/ER-/PR-) breast cancer. In the United States, 39,000 women die of breast cancer each year and over 450,000 deaths can be attributed to breast cancer annually worldwide, according to the National Cancer Institute and the WHO. In women, breast cancer remains the cancer of highest incidence and mortality despite intensive efforts of drug development and the provision of new treatment options. Prognosis for patients who can be treated with Her2 targeting therapies has improved. However, the majority of women who develop breast cancer do not overexpress Her2. Additional treatments are needed for patients with triple negative breast cancer and endocrine receptor positive patients refractory to endocrine specific treatments. Theraclone believes that the development of additional treatment options for triple negative breast cancer and hormone refractory metastatic ER+ breast cancer can fulfill a significant unmet medical need.

Capabilities of I-STAR: Technology for Human Antibody Discovery & Development

The ability to identify therapeutic antibody candidates directly from humans has been long sought after; however, isolation of such antibodies from human sources has historically been difficult and inefficient. Theraclone has developed and optimized its proprietary human antibody discovery technology, I-STAR, to derive antibodies directly from human memory B cells, which may be developed into therapeutic product candidates. Memory B cells are cells that the immune system generates in response to a foreign pathogen or to components of cancer cells, both also referred to as the “target.” Each memory B cell produces a specific antibody that can bind to these targets. The human immune system makes many different memory B cells producing a variety of different antibodies that recognize different parts of targets. For protection against development or progression of disease, human antibodies may act through different mechanisms of action, including neutralization and effector cell mediated immunity.

211


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Figure 1:  The process of deriving human antibodies from human memory B cells.

[GRAPHIC MISSING]

Through the following procedures, as depicted in Figure 1 above, I-STAR enables the highly-efficient examination of antibodies produced by individual human memory B cells to identify those with the greatest potential to be developed into drugs in the following steps:

Step One.  Theraclone collects a small blood sample from human subjects from which it isolates the memory B cells. The subjects are carefully selected based on their medical history. These subjects have either been diagnosed with a disease or have recovered from a disease for which Theraclone wants to discover and develop therapeutic antibody product candidates. In some cases, subjects may have received a relevant vaccine.
Step Two.  Individual memory B cells, also referred to as B cell clones, are then “activated.” Upon activation, the memory B cells start to proliferate, differentiate and produce antibodies.
Step Three.  Using a variety of tests and assays, Theraclone screens the antibodies to identify those that bind to a specific target (a pathogen or cancer cell surface) or that neutralize infection by a pathogen. The entire process is conducted in a miniaturized, automated format supported with high throughput robotics.
Step Four.  The B cells that produced the antibodies with the desired activity are selected for DNA sequencing of the antibodies. Theraclone utilizes high throughput sequencing technologies called “deep sequencing” or “next generation sequencing,” as well as bioinformatics tools, to streamline the sequencing process for maximal output efficiency.
Step Five.  Once the antibody sequences have been determined, Theraclone produces the antibodies as recombinant proteins in cell culture and purifies them. Antibodies are reconstituted as recombinant IgG, a common human antibody framework, typically as the IgG1 isotype. The recombinant antibodies are characterized in-depth using a variety of assays and other tools to confirm their protective activity towards disease and to determine the extent of protection (which is also referred to as their breadth and potency and often described as the “efficacy”). The most potent and efficacious antibodies are selected as the therapeutic antibody product candidates to enter process, pre-clinical and clinical development.

The process can also facilitate novel target discovery of antibodies with desirable functions without prior knowledge of the target identity. For example, in oncology, Theraclone has successfully identified internalizing

212


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

antibodies possessing a broad range of diverse specificities that may be product candidates for antibody drug conjugation. I-STAR technology is applicable to the discovery of antibodies in multiple disease indications, including vaccine development.

Theraclone believes the discovery of therapeutic antibody product candidates using the I-STAR technology has many advantages over other antibody discovery methods, including:

rapid testing and functional screening of tens of thousands of human memory B cells and the antibodies they produce via rigorous examination of nearly every human memory B cell in a given blood sample;
identification of naturally elicited and evolved antibodies with the best affinities and selectivity, therefore eliminating the need for further optimization of the antibody through protein engineering;
discovery of rare antibodies from humans directed against novel and subdominant epitopes without the need for prior knowledge of the molecular target; and
reduced risk of immunogenicity, improved safety, favorable pharmacokinetic and stability profile and simplified manufacturing due to preservation of the natural structure of the fully human antibodies.

Collaborations

Zenyaku Kogyo

In March 2010, Theraclone entered into a strategic alliance with Zenyaku Kogyo, or Zenyaku, to develop anti-influenza antibody therapeutics. As part of the agreement with Theraclone, Zenyaku exercised its option for an exclusive license in the Japanese territory to Theraclone’s influenza monoclonal antibody program. The collaboration utilizes Theraclone’s I-STAR technology to discover broadly protective monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of pandemic influenza and severe seasonal influenza, including product candidate TCN-032. The agreement provides for royalty rates in the mid single digits to low double digits for potential future sales in Japan, clinical milestone payments of up to $18 million upon the achievement of certain development and regulatory milestones during the term of the agreement. Theraclone retains worldwide development and commercial rights outside of Japan. Zenyaku is eligible to receive a share of proceeds from Theraclone’s licensing of rights in certain Asian countries outside of Japan. The term of the agreement will continue on a country-by-country and product-by-product basis unless earlier terminated per the terms of the agreement, until the earlier of the expiration, invalidation or unenforceability of the patents or pending patent applications covered by the agreement or ten years from the commercial launch of the applicable product. If Zenyaku determines not to proceed with the products licensed under the agreement, then Zenyaku may terminate the agreement upon 30 days prior written notice to Theraclone. Additionally, either party may terminate the agreement under certain other circumstances, including an uncured material breach of any material provision of the agreement and bankruptcy. Theraclone completed a substantial portion of the development activities in connection with the agreement during 2012, by completing the TCN-032 Phase 1 clinical trial and initiating and completing the majority of the subject enrollment portion of the Phase 2a trial. To date, Theraclone has received from Zenyaku an aggregate of approximately $21.7 million in fees, research funding payments and milestone payments in support of the influenza discovery and development program through the TCN-032 Phase 1 clinical study, and three equity investments totaling $2 million.

Pfizer

In January 2011, Theraclone entered into a multi-year, exclusive discovery research partnership with Pfizer. The collaboration is based on use of Theraclone’s I-STAR technology to discover broadly protective monoclonal antibodies against up to four undisclosed targets in the areas of infectious disease and cancer. Pfizer is responsible for preclinical and clinical development of the antibodies under this collaboration. Pfizer will receive an exclusive worldwide license to any therapeutic antibodies discovered under the collaboration. Theraclone is eligible to receive royalties at rates in the mid to high single digits on net sales of any developed products and research funding and milestone payments upon the achievement of discovery, development, regulatory and commercialization milestones. These milestone payments are contingent upon the successful achievement of specified development activities such as clinical trial initiation or regulatory activities based upon Pfizer’s performance. As of June 30, 2013, Theraclone had received approximately

213


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

$11.5 million in fees and milestone payments from Pfizer. The term of the agreement will continue on a country-by-country and product-by-product basis, unless earlier terminated per the terms of the agreement, until the earlier of the expiration, invalidation, revocation or unenforceability of the patents or pending patent applications covered by the agreement or ten years from the first commercial sale of the applicable product. Pfizer may terminate the agreement on a target-by-target or product-by-product and country-by-country basis for any reason or for no reason upon 60 days prior written notice to Theraclone or, upon written notice, in the event of Theraclone’s bankruptcy. Additionally, either party may terminate the agreement upon the other party’s uncured material breach of such other party’s obligations under the agreement. Theraclone has completed work on the first infectious disease program, has nearly completed work on the initial cancer program, and in March of 2013, Pfizer terminated the second infectious disease program. Additional funding under this agreement depends on whether Pfizer decides to initiate another research program.

IAVI

In February 2008, Theraclone commenced an anti-HIV antibody discovery program with IAVI. As a part of this program, Theraclone is utilizing its I-STAR technology to discover antibodies that neutralize the HIV virus. Under the terms of a collaboration agreement, IAVI retains the rights to develop HIV vaccines based on the antibodies and Theraclone retains the rights to develop therapeutics based on the antibodies. Together, Theraclone and IAVI have discovered a large panel of broadly neutralizing and highly potent anti-HIV monoclonal antibodies that recognize novel epitopes present in a broad range of virus in circulation. Theraclone’s intent is to identify a licensee for the therapeutic use of these monoclonal antibodies. To date, Theraclone has received approximately $4.4 million in research payments. The term of the collaboration agreement continues, unless earlier terminated per the terms of the agreement, until all deliverables have been provided by Theraclone to IAVI. The collaboration agreement may be terminated by IAVI if it is not reasonably satisfied with Theraclone’s performance or if there are significant changes in the scientific staffing at Theraclone that IAVI believes may jeopardize the discovery program. Additionally, either party may terminate the collaboration agreement upon the other party’s uncured failure to comply with any material terms or conditions of the collaboration agreement.

Intellectual Property

Patents and Patent Applications

Theraclone protects its intellectual property by filing patents on:

composition of matter, or CoM, for antibodies,
CoM for novel target epitopes, and
uses of both, including therapeutic use of the antibody and use of the antibody for “reverse-engineering” of a vaccine candidate and including combination therapeutic uses.

CoM patents encompass gene and protein sequences, and variants and derivatives thereof. The status of individual filings varies, and, as of August 31, 2013, 28 patents have been granted or allowed nationally and/or internationally, with expiration dates ranging from November 12, 2028 to March 20, 2030.

As of August 31, 2013, Theraclone had over 90 patents and pending patent applications in its patent portfolio, of which it was the sole owner of seven issued or allowed U.S. patents, with expiration dates ranging from November 12, 2028 to March 20, 2030, and 21 issued or allowed foreign patents, with expiration dates of November 12, 2028. Theraclone also had approximately 63 additional pending patent applications (including provisionals) in the United States, Europe, Asia and other jurisdictions as of such date. There can be no assurances that these patent applications will be granted. In addition to the patents and patent applications owned by Theraclone, its patent portfolio includes patents and patent applications filled in conjunction with the IAVI and Scripps Research Institute. The term of individual patents depends upon the legal term of the patents in the countries in which they are obtained. In most countries in which Theraclone files, the patent term is 20 years from the earliest date of filing a non-provisional patent application. In the United States, the patent term of a patent that covers an FDA-approved drug may also be eligible for patent term extension, which permits patent term restoration as compensation for the patent term lost during the FDA regulatory review process. The length of the patent term extension is related to the length of time the drug is

214


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

under regulatory review. Patent term extension cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of 14 years from the date of product approval and only one patent applicable to an approved drug may be extended. Similar provisions are available in Europe and other foreign jurisdictions to extend the term of a patent that covers an approved drug. In the future, if and when Theraclone’s products receive FDA approval, Theraclone expects to apply for patent term extensions on patents covering those products. Theraclone plans to seek patent term extensions to any of its issued patents in any jurisdiction where these are available. However, there is no guarantee that the applicable authorities, including the FDA in the United States, will agree with its assessment of whether such extensions should be granted, and if granted, the length of such extensions.

The patent positions of biotechnology companies like Theraclone are generally uncertain and involve complex legal, scientific and factual questions. In addition, the coverage claimed in a patent application can be significantly reduced before the patent is issued, and its scope can be reinterpreted after issuance. Consequently, Theraclone may not obtain or maintain adequate patent protection for any of its product candidates. Theraclone cannot predict whether the patent applications it is currently pursuing will issue as patents in any particular jurisdiction or whether the claims of any issued patents will provide sufficient proprietary protection from competitors. Any patents that it holds may be challenged, circumvented or invalidated by third parties.

Trade Secrets

Theraclone also relies on trade secret protection for its confidential and proprietary information, including the I-STAR technology. Although Theraclone takes steps to protect its proprietary information and trade secrets, including through contractual means with its employees, consultants and others, third parties may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques or otherwise gain access to its trade secrets or disclose its technology. Thus, Theraclone may not be able to meaningfully protect its trade secrets. It is Theraclone’s policy to require its employees, consultants, outside scientific collaborators, sponsored researchers and other advisors to execute confidentiality agreements upon the commencement of employment or consulting relationships with Theraclone. These confidentiality agreements provide that all confidential information concerning its business or financial affairs developed or made known to the individual during the course of the individual’s relationship with it is to be kept confidential and not disclosed to third parties except in specific circumstances. Theraclone’s confidentiality agreements with its employees also provide that all inventions conceived by the employee in the course of employment with it or from the employee’s use of Theraclone’s confidential information are Theraclone’s exclusive property.

Manufacturing

Theraclone does not currently own or operate manufacturing facilities for the production of clinical or commercial quantities of its product candidates. Theraclone has small-scale antibody production capabilities and generally performs limited process development for its product candidates to produce quantities of its product candidates necessary to conduct preclinical studies of its investigational product candidates. Theraclone does not have and it does not currently plan to acquire or develop the facilities or capabilities to manufacture bulk drug substance or filled drug product for use in human clinical studies. Theraclone relies on contract manufacturing organizations, or CMOs, and third party contractors to generate production cell lines, perform cell culture production development and produce larger scale amounts of drug substance and the drug product required for its clinical studies. Theraclone expects to continue to rely on CMOs to manufacture cGMP drug substance and drug product required for its clinical studies for the foreseeable future. Theraclone also contracts with CMOs for the labeling, packaging, storage and distribution of investigational drug products. These arrangements allow Theraclone to maintain a more flexible infrastructure while focusing its expertise on developing its products. Theraclone has personnel with the necessary technical, manufacturing, analytical, quality and project management experience to oversee its contract manufacturers and to manage manufacturing and quality data for regulatory compliance purposes.

215


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone expects to continue to rely on contract manufacturers to produce sufficient quantities of its product candidates in accordance with cGMP for use in clinical trials. The cGMP compliance includes strict adherence to regulations for quality control, quality assurance, and the maintenance of records and documentation. The manufacturing facilities for Theraclone’s approved products, if any, must meet cGMP requirements and have acquired FDA or other regulatory approval for the manufacturing of Theraclone’s commercial products. Theraclone’s contract manufacturers may also be subject to inspections of facilities by regulatory authorities to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. Contract manufacturers often encounter difficulties involving production yields, quality control and quality assurance, as well as shortages of qualified personnel. Theraclone has little or no direct control over its manufacturers’ compliance with these regulations and standards. Failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements may result in fines and civil penalties, suspension of production, suspension or delay in product approval, product seizure or recall, or withdrawal of product approval. These actions could have a material impact on the availability of products.

Manufacture of Product Candidates TCN-032 and TCN-202

Theraclone has performed its own initial purification process development, has developed drug product formulations and has adopted a manufacturing strategy of using CMOs for the manufacture of drug substance and drug product to meet the clinical requirements and commercial needs. Theraclone has contracted with CMOs and third party contractors for the manufacture of TCN-032 and TCN-202 bulk drug substance and drug product and for the labeling and distribution of TCN-032 and TCN-202 drug product for its planned clinical studies.

TCN-032 and TCN-202 are currently manufactured in mammalian cell expression systems from readily available starting materials. To the extent that TCN-032 and TCN-202 advance through clinical studies, and to the extent Theraclone brings its future product candidates into clinical studies and collaborates with partners in the development and commercialization of any of Theraclone’s product candidates, Theraclone and its existing and prospective partners will be required to assess the manufacturing needs of the product candidates in terms of clinical testing requirements and for commercial production.

Government Regulation

Government authorities in the United States at the federal, state and local level, and other countries, extensively regulate, among other things, the research, development, testing, manufacture, labeling, promotion, advertising, distribution, marketing, and export and import of immunopharmaceutical products such as those Theraclone is developing.

All of Theraclone’s current product candidates are subject to regulation in the United States by the FDA as biological products, or biologics. The FDA subjects biologics to extensive pre- and post-market regulations. The Public Health Service Act, or PHSA, the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, or FDC Act, and other federal and state statutes and regulations, govern, among other things, the research, development, testing, manufacture, storage, recordkeeping, approval, labeling, promotion and marketing, distribution, post-approval monitoring and reporting, sampling, and import and export of biologics. Failure to comply with applicable U.S. requirements may subject a company to a variety of administrative or judicial sanctions, such as FDA refusal to approve pending BLAs withdrawal of approvals, clinical holds, warning letters, product recalls, product seizures, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, injunctions, fines, civil penalties or criminal penalties

United States Government Regulation

In the United States, the information that must be submitted to the FDA in order to obtain approval to market a new drug varies depending on whether the drug is a new product whose safety and effectiveness has not previously been demonstrated in humans or a drug whose active ingredients and certain other properties are the same as those of a previously approved drug. A new biologic will follow the BLA route for approval, a new drug will follow the New Drug Application, or NDA, route for approval, and a drug that claims to be the same as an already approved drug may be able to follow the Abbreviated New Drug Application route for approval.

216


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The process required by the FDA before a new biologic obtains approval and may be marketed in the United States is long, expensive, and inherently uncertain. Biologics development in the United States typically involves preclinical laboratory and animal tests, the submission to the FDA of either a notice of claimed investigational exemption or an Investigational New Drug, or IND, which must become effective before human clinical testing may commence, and adequate and well-controlled clinical trials to establish the safety and effectiveness of the biologic for each indication for which FDA approval is sought. Satisfaction of FDA pre-market approval requirements typically takes many years and the actual time required may vary substantially based upon the type, complexity, and novelty of the product or disease.

Biologics License Application Approval Process

In the United States, the FDA regulates drugs and biologics under the FDC Act and, in the case of biologics, under the Public Health Service Act, or PHSA, and the FDA’s implementing regulations. To help reduce the increased risk of the introduction of adventitious agents, the PHSA emphasizes the importance of manufacturing control for products whose attributes cannot be precisely defined. The PHSA also provides authority to the FDA to immediately suspend licenses in situations where there exists a danger to public health, to prepare or procure products in the event of shortages and critical public health needs, and to authorize the creation and enforcement of regulations to prevent the introduction, or spread, of communicable diseases in the United States and between states.

If Theraclone fails to comply with the applicable U.S. requirements at any time during the product development process, approval process or after approval, Theraclone may become subject to administrative or judicial sanctions. These sanctions could include the FDA’s refusal to approve pending applications, license suspension or revocation, withdrawal of an approval, a clinical hold, warning letters, product recalls, product seizures, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, injunctions, fines, civil penalties or criminal prosecution. Any agency or judicial enforcement action could have a material adverse effect on Theraclone.

The major steps required before a biologic drug may be marketed in the United States include:

completion of laboratory tests and animal studies under the FDA’s good laboratory practices regulations;
submission to the FDA of an IND application for human clinical testing, which must become effective before human clinical trials may begin;
performance of adequate and well-controlled clinical trials to establish the safety and efficacy of the product for each indication;
submission to the FDA of a BLA which includes the results of all required preclinical animal studies, laboratory tests, clinical trials, and data relating to the product’s pharmacology, chemistry, manufacture and control;
satisfactory completion of an FDA inspection of the manufacturing facility or facilities at which the product is produced to assess compliance with cGMP; and
FDA review and approval of the BLA.

Preclinical tests include laboratory evaluations of product chemistry, toxicity and formulation, as well as animal studies. Long-term preclinical tests, such as animal tests for reproductive toxicity and carcinogenicity, may continue after the IND is submitted. The IND must become effective before human clinical trials may begin. An IND will automatically become effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA, subject to certain exceptions. The FDA may order the temporary or permanent discontinuation of a clinical trial at any time or impose other sanctions if it believes that the clinical trial is not being conducted in accordance with FDA requirements or presents an unacceptable risk to the trial subjects.

Clinical trials involve the administration of the investigational new drug or biologic to healthy volunteers or patients under the supervision of a qualified investigator. Clinical trials must be conducted: (i) in compliance with federal regulations; (ii) in compliance with good clinical practice, or GCP, an international standard meant to protect the rights and health of patients and to define the roles of clinical trial sponsors, administrators, and monitors; as well as (iii) under protocols detailing the objectives of the trial, the

217


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

parameters to be used in monitoring safety, and the effectiveness criteria to be evaluated. Each protocol involving testing on U.S. patients and subsequent protocol amendments must be submitted to the FDA as part of the IND.

The FDA may order the temporary, or permanent, discontinuation of a clinical trial at any time or impose other sanctions if it believes that the clinical trial either is not being conducted in accordance with FDA requirements or presents an unacceptable risk to the clinical trial patients. The study protocol and informed consent information for patients in clinical trials must also be submitted to an institutional review board, or IRB, for approval. An IRB may also require the clinical trial at the site to be halted, either temporarily or permanently, for failure to comply with the IRB’s requirements, or may impose other conditions. The study sponsor may also suspend a clinical trial at any time on various grounds, including a determination that the subjects or patients are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk.

Clinical trials typically are conducted in three sequential phases, but the phases may overlap or be combined.

Phase 1 clinical trials usually involve the initial introduction of the investigational drug into humans to evaluate the product’s safety, dosage tolerance, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and, if possible, to gain an early indication of its efficacy.

Phase 2 clinical trials usually involve controlled trials in a limited patient population to:

Evaluate dosage tolerance and appropriate dosage
Identify possible adverse effects and safety risks
Evaluate preliminarily the efficacy of the drug for specific indications

Phase 3 clinical trials usually further evaluate clinical efficacy and further test for safety in an expanded patient population. Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 trials may not be completed successfully within any specified period, if at all. The FDA or Theraclone, or Theraclone’s collaborators may suspend or terminate clinical trials at any time on various grounds, including a finding that the subjects or patients are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk. Prior to conducting Phase 3 trials, an applicant may seek a special protocol assessment, which is an agreement between an applicant and the FDA on the design and size of clinical trials that are intended to form the basis of a BLA.

After completion of the required clinical testing, a BLA is prepared and submitted to the FDA. FDA review and approval of the BLA is required before marketing of the product may begin in the United States. The FDA has 60 days from its receipt of a BLA to determine whether the application will be accepted for filing based on the agency’s threshold determination that it is sufficiently complete to permit substantive review. The testing and approval process requires substantial time, effort and financial resources, and each may take several years to complete. The FDA may not grant approval on a timely basis, if at all. Theraclone may encounter difficulties or unanticipated costs in its efforts to secure necessary governmental approvals, which could delay or preclude Theraclone from marketing its product candidates. The FDA may limit the indications for use or place other conditions on any approvals that could restrict the commercial application of its product candidates. After approval, some types of changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications, manufacturing changes and additional labeling claims, are subject to further FDA review and approval.

Orphan Drug Designation

Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may grant orphan drug designation to biologics intended to treat a rare disease or condition — generally a disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States. Orphan drug designation must be requested before submitting a BLA. After the FDA grants orphan drug designation, the generic identity of the biologic and its potential orphan use are disclosed publicly by the FDA. Among the other benefits of orphan drug designation are tax credits for certain research and a waiver of the BLA application user fee. Orphan drug designation, however, does not convey any advantage in, or shorten the duration of, the regulatory review and approval process. The first BLA applicant to receive FDA approval for a particular active ingredient to treat a particular disease with FDA orphan drug designation is entitled to a seven-year exclusive marketing period in the United States for that product, for that indication.

218


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

During the seven-year exclusivity period, the FDA may not approve any other applications, including a full NDA to market the same drug for the same orphan indication, except in limited circumstances, such as a showing of clinical superiority to the product with orphan drug exclusivity. Orphan drug exclusivity does not prevent the FDA from approving a different biologic for the same disease or condition, or the same biologic for a different disease or condition.

Foreign Regulation

In addition to regulations in the United States, Theraclone will be subject to a variety of foreign regulations governing clinical trials and commercial sales and distribution of its product candidates. Whether or not Theraclone obtains FDA approval for a product candidate, Theraclone must obtain approval by the comparable regulatory authorities of foreign countries before it can commence clinical trials or marketing of the product candidate in those countries. The approval process varies from country to country, and the time may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA approval. The requirements governing the conduct of clinical trials, product licensing, pricing and reimbursement vary greatly from country to country.

Under European Union regulatory systems, a marketing authorization for a medical product derived from biotechnology processes must be submitted under a centralized procedure, which provides for the grant of a single marketing authorization that is valid for all European Union member states.

Reimbursement

In the United States and other countries, sales of any products for which Theraclone receives regulatory approval for commercial sale will depend in part on the availability of reimbursement from third-party payors, including government health administrative authorities, managed care providers, private health insurers and other organizations. Each third-party payor may have its own policy regarding what products it will cover, the conditions under which it will cover such products, and how much it will pay for such products. Third-party payors are increasingly examining the medical necessity and cost effectiveness of medical products and services in addition to safety and efficacy and, accordingly, significant uncertainty exists as to the reimbursement status of newly approved therapeutics. Third-party reimbursement adequate to enable Theraclone to realize an appropriate return on Theraclone’s investment in research and product development may not be available for Theraclone’s products.

The passage of the Medicare Prescription Drug and Modernization Act of 2003, or the MMA, sets forth the requirements for the distribution and pricing of prescription drugs for Medicare beneficiaries, which may affect the marketing of Theraclone’s products. The MMA also introduced a new reimbursement methodology. Moreover, while the MMA applies only to drug benefits for Medicare beneficiaries, private payors often follow Medicare coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their own payment rates. Any reduction in payment that results from the MMA may result in a similar reduction in payments from non-governmental payors.

In addition, in some foreign countries, the proposed pricing for a drug must be approved before it may be lawfully marketed. The requirements governing drug pricing vary widely from country to country. For example, the European Union provides options for its member states to restrict the range of medicinal products for which their national health insurance systems provide reimbursement and to control the prices of medicinal products for human use. A member state may approve a specific price for the medicinal product or it may instead adopt a system of direct or indirect controls on the profitability of the company placing the medicinal product on the market.

Theraclone expects there will continue to be a number of federal and state proposals to implement governmental pricing controls. While Theraclone cannot predict whether such legislative or regulatory proposals will be adopted, the adoption of such proposals could have a material adverse effect on Theraclone’s business, financial condition and profitability.

Competition

For Theraclone’s product candidates in development, Theraclone faces competition from other entities involved in the research and development of therapeutic proteins, antibody products and pharmaceuticals, including The Roche Group (Genentech), GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,

219


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Astellas Pharma US, Inc., Chimerix, Inc. and Merck & Co., Inc. A number of Theraclone’s largest competitors are pursuing the development or marketing of pharmaceuticals that address the same diseases that Theraclone is pursuing, and the number of companies seeking to develop products and therapies for these diseases may increase. Theraclone also faces competition from entities developing other types of products targeting particular diseases, including other biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, universities, public and private research institutions, government entities and other organizations.

Furthermore, Theraclone’s potential products, if approved and commercialized, may compete against well-established therapeutic protein-based products or well-established antibody products, many of which may be currently reimbursed by government health administration authorities, private health insurers and health maintenance organizations. For example, if approved for the treatment of influenza, Theraclone anticipates that its product candidate, TCN-032, would compete with other therapies for influenza, including existing antivirals (oseltamivir, zanamivir) and other products in development (peramivir, anti-HA antibodies, VX-787, nitazoxanide). If approved for the treatment of CMV, Theraclone anticipates that its product candidate, TCN-202, would compete with other therapies for CMV, including existing antivirals (ganciclovir, valganciclovir), and other products in development (CMX-001, letermovir and ASP0113).

Many of Theraclone’s existing and potential competitors have substantially greater research, product development and commercial capabilities, and financial, scientific, marketing and human resources than Theraclone does. In addition, many specialized biotechnology firms have formed collaborations with large, established companies to support the research, development and commercialization of products that may be competitive with Theraclone. Accordingly, Theraclone’s competitors may be more successful than Theraclone may be in developing, commercializing and achieving widespread market acceptance. In addition, Theraclone’s competitors’ products may be more effective or more effectively marketed and sold than any treatment Theraclone or its development partners may commercialize and may render Theraclone’s product candidates obsolete or noncompetitive before it can recover the expenses related to developing and commercializing any of its product candidates.

Employees

As of August 31, 2013, Theraclone had 31 full-time employees, 26 of whom were engaged in full-time research and development activities. None of Theraclone’s employees are represented by any collective bargaining unit. Theraclone believes that it maintains good relations with its employees.

Facility

Theraclone rents office and laboratory space in Seattle, Washington, which consists of approximately 24,000 square feet. The term of the current lease for the Theraclone facility extends through June 30, 2018.

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, Theraclone may be involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of its operations in the normal course of business. Theraclone is not currently a party to any legal proceedings, the adverse outcome of which, in its management’s opinion, individually or in the aggregate, would have a material adverse effect on the results of its operations or financial position.

220


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

THERACLONE’S MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This discussion of Theraclone’s financial condition and results of operations should be read together with the consolidated financial statements and notes contained elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation. Certain statements in this section and other sections are forward-looking. While Theraclone believes these statements are accurate, its business is dependent on many factors, some of which are discussed in the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and “Theraclone’s Business.” Many of these factors are beyond Theraclone’s control and any of these and other factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements made in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation. See the section entitled “Risk Factors” for further information regarding these factors. Theraclone undertakes no obligation to release publicly the results of any revisions to the statements contained in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation to reflect events or circumstances that occur subsequent to the date of this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation.

Overview

Theraclone Sciences, Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company focused on the discovery and development of novel, monoclonal antibody therapeutics for diseases that are devastating for patients and their families and which are a significant threat to human health. Theraclone leverages its proprietary antibody discovery technology, I STAR (In-Situ Therapeutic Antibody Rescue), to identify rare human antibodies that may be developed into antibody product candidates that are potentially safer and more effective than current therapies. Theraclone has a portfolio of innovative antibodies in clinical and preclinical development targeting serious medical conditions with a significant unmet medical need and with a primary focus on infectious disease and cancer.

Theraclone’s I-STAR technology enables discovery of fully human antibodies from human subjects that Theraclone believes have significant advantages over antibodies that are discovered with other methods, for example, antibodies discovered using animal immunization technologies or antibodies generated without undergoing natural maturation processes in humans. The ability to discover therapeutic antibody candidates directly from humans has been long sought. Isolation of such antibodies from human sources, however, has historically been difficult and inefficient. Theraclone’s I-STAR antibodies are affinity matured in the human immune system. Affinity maturation refers to the process by which B-cells produce antibodies with increased affinity for the corresponding antigens during the course of an immune response. Theraclone’s I-STAR antibodies are highly specific to their targets, presenting minimal risk of undesired immune response and thus providing a significant safety benefit in clinical settings when a drug is required to be administered repeatedly or chronically. As a treatment for infectious diseases, Theraclone believes that human antibodies can provide immediate immunity, which is particularly important for immuno-compromised, elderly and pediatric patients who have weak or immature immune systems.

Theraclone has advanced two infectious disease product candidates into Phase 2 clinical development:

TCN-032. Theraclone’s flu antibody, TCN-032, is a recombinant fully human monoclonal antibody for the treatment of patients hospitalized with serious influenza. TCN-032 targets all known seasonal, pandemic and highly-pathogenic influenza A virus strains. Theraclone has completed a placebo controlled proof-of-concept Phase 2a viral challenge clinical study of TCN-032 in human volunteers, which, while not meeting its primary endpoint, nevertheless demonstrated significant reductions in clinical symptoms and viral shedding. As of August 31, 2013, Theraclone had dosed 59 subjects in Phase 1 and Phase 2a clinical studies of TCN-032. Theraclone is currently planning a dose ranging Phase 2 clinical study in patients with uncomplicated seasonal flu, as well as a Phase 2a safety study in patients hospitalized with serious influenza. Please refer to the section entitled “—Flu Antibody Drug Candidate TCN-032—TCN-032 Clinical Development Program” for further details on this product candidate, including the concluded Phase 2a study.
TCN-202. Theraclone’s cytomegalovirus (CMV) antibody, TCN-202, is a recombinant fully human monoclonal antibody for the treatment and prevention of CMV infections. Theraclone has completed a Phase 1 clinical safety study of TCN-202, which generated data showing that this product candidate was

221


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

safe, well-tolerated, not immunogenic and had a pharmacokinetic profile consistent with a human antibody. Theraclone began a proof-of-concept Phase 2a clinical trial in kidney transplant patients in August 2013. Study data are projected to be reported in the third quarter of 2014.

Theraclone is also working to identify additional fully human antibodies to expand its discovery pipeline of potential product candidates targeting infectious disease and oncology indications.

On July 31, 2013, Theraclone entered into the Merger Agreement with PharmAthene, Merger Sub and Steven Gillis, Ph.D., as Securityholders’ Representative, pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into Theraclone and Theraclone will survive the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of PharmAthene. Upon completion of the merger, the PharmAthene security holders will own 50% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, and Theraclone security holders will own 50% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, in each case, on an as converted and fully diluted basis but excluding PharmAthene warrants and options with an exercise price of more than $2.50 per share. Based on the number of outstanding securities of each company as of September 3, 2013, (i) if no PharmAthene or Theraclone options or warrants are exercised prior to the completion of the merger, PharmAthene and Theraclone security holders would own, respectively, approximately 54.1% and 45.9% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the combined company and (ii) if PharmAthene warrants and options with an exercise price of more than $2.50 per share are exercised, to the extent such exercises occur, PharmAthene and Theraclone security holders could own, respectively, between approximately 51.5% and 50.0% and 48.5% and 50.0% of the outstanding equity of the combined company, on a fully diluted basis. The transaction has been approved by the Board of Directors of both companies and is subject to customary closing conditions, including the approval of the stockholders of Theraclone and PharmAthene. The merger is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2013.

Theraclone has not generated any revenue from product sales. Theraclone has generated total revenue of $8.4 million, $19.4 million and $4.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 and the six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, primarily from upfront payments, research funding and development milestones received from collaboration and license agreements with Zenyaku Kogyo, Pfizer and IAVI. Theraclone has incurred significant net losses since inception and expects to continue to experience significant losses as it invests in the development of its product candidates. As of June 30, 2013, Theraclone’s accumulated deficit was $61.0 million. Theraclone’s net losses were $8.4 million, $2.8 million and $2.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 and the six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.

Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates

Theraclone’s management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based on its financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires Theraclone to make judgments and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as reported revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Theraclone bases its estimates on historical experience and on other factors that Theraclone believes are reasonable under the circumstances. An accounting policy is considered to be critical if it is important to a company’s financial condition and results of operations, and if it requires the exercise of significant judgment and the use of estimates on the part of management in its application. Although Theraclone believes its judgments and estimates are appropriate, actual results may differ from those estimates.

Theraclone’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to its financial statements included in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation. Theraclone believes that the following accounting policies relating to revenue recognition, convertible preferred stock warrant liability and preferred stock forward contract are the most critical to understanding and evaluating its reported financial results.

Revenue recognition

Revenue is recognized when there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists, service has been provided, the price is fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured.

222


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Multiple Element Arrangements

Theraclone’s collaborative agreements with Pfizer, Zenyaku Kogyo and the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, or IAVI, are multiple element arrangements that must be analyzed to identify the deliverables included in the agreements to determine if the deliverables qualify as separate units of accounting. The terms of the agreements may include nonrefundable license fees, funding of research and development activities and payments based upon the achievement of clinical or revenue milestones and royalties. Deliverables are considered a separate unit of accounting when all of the following criteria are met: (i) the delivered item has value to the customer on a standalone basis and (ii) if the arrangement includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item, the delivery or performance of the undelivered item is considered probable and substantially in Theraclone’s control. There are no rights of return in Theraclone’s collaborative agreements. Multiple contracts with a single party are evaluated as one arrangement if the contracts were entered into in contemplation of each other.

Theraclone’s collaborative agreements with multiple elements do not meet the criteria for separate units of accounting and therefore are treated as combined units of accounting to determine appropriate recognition of revenue. For combined units of accounting, the revenue is generally recognized in the same manner as the final deliverable. Revenue is recognized in a manner consistent with the nature of the agreements, which generally is based on a proportional performance methodology, over the estimated term of the research and development service period. In certain circumstances revenue may be recognized on a straight-line basis over the estimated service period or immediately if there is no continuing obligation for the specific deliverable. The estimated term of the research and development service period is reviewed and adjusted based on the status of the project against the estimated timeline as additional information becomes available. Payments received in advance of work performed are recorded as deferred revenue and recognized when earned.

Substantive Milestone Payments

Theraclone’s collaboration agreements with Pfizer and Zenyaku Kogyo provide for substantive milestones. A milestone is defined as an event that meets the following conditions: (i) there is substantive uncertainty on the date the arrangement is entered into about whether the event will be achieved; (ii) achievement of the event is based in whole, or in part, on either Theraclone’s performance or a specific outcome resulting from Theraclone’s performance; and (iii) achievement of the event results in additional payment due to Theraclone. For a milestone to be considered substantive, the payment associated with its achievement must have all of the following characteristics: (i) relate solely to Theraclone’s past performance; (ii) be reasonable, relative to all of the deliverables and payment terms in the arrangement; and (iii) be commensurate with either Theraclone’s effort required to achieve the milestone or the enhanced value of the delivered item(s) as a result of the milestone achievement.

Substantive milestone payments are recognized upon achievement of the milestone only if all of the previous conditions are met and the milestone payments are nonrefundable. Determination as to whether a payment meets the aforementioned conditions involves management’s judgment. Theraclone has evaluated the nature of its arrangements and has elected to make a policy election to apply the milestone method where appropriate for its arrangements.

If any of the foregoing conditions are not met, the resulting payment would not be considered a substantive milestone, and therefore, the resulting payment would be determined to be part of the allocable arrangement consideration and would be recognized as revenue as such performance obligations are performed under either the proportional performance or time-based methods, as applicable, and in accordance with the policies as described above.

Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability

Theraclone accounts for freestanding warrants related to shares that are redeemable for cash as liabilities at fair value because the warrants may conditionally obligate Theraclone to transfer assets at some point in the future. The preferred stock warrant liability is subject to remeasurement at each balance sheet date, and any changes in fair value are recognized as a component of net loss in the statements of operations. Theraclone estimated the fair value of the warrant liability at the respective balance sheet dates on a marketable minority basis using the Option Pricing Model (OPM) using the following assumptions as of June 30, 2013: volatility of 55%, expected life of 0.92 years, estimated fair value of Series B convertible preferred stock of $1.48 per

223


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

share, no dividends, and a risk-free interest rate of 0.13%. The assumptions used in the valuation model are highly subjective and could differ materially in the future.

Theraclone will continue to record adjustments to the fair value of the warrants until they are exercised, expire or, upon the closing of the merger, convert into warrants to purchase shares of PharmAthene common stock, at which time the warrants will no longer be treated as liabilities. At that time, the then-current aggregate fair value of the warrants will be reclassified from a liability to additional paid-in capital, a component of stockholders’ deficit, and Theraclone will cease to record any related periodic fair value adjustments. Upon the closing of the merger, warrants to purchase Theraclone’s preferred stock will be assumed by PharmAthene and converted into warrants to purchase PharmAthene common stock. The number of shares of Theraclone common stock subject to each assumed warrant will be determined by multiplying the number of shares of Theraclone common stock (for Theraclone common stock warrants), or the number of shares of Theraclone common stock issuable upon conversion of the shares of Theraclone preferred stock issuable upon exercise of such warrant (for Theraclone preferred stock warrants), as applicable, that were subject to such warrant prior to the Effective Time of the merger by the exchange ratio and rounding the result down to the nearest whole number of shares of PharmAthene common stock. The per share exercise price for the assumed warrants will be determined by dividing the per share exercise price of the warrant as in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time of the merger by the exchange ratio and rounding that result up to the nearest whole cent.

Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock Forward Contract

In March 2013, Theraclone entered into the Series B-1 Preferred Stock and Warrant Purchase and Exchange Agreement (Series B-1 Agreement) with current stockholders. Under the Series B-1 Agreement, existing Series A and B convertible preferred stock were converted into shares of Series A-1 and B-1, respectively, and Theraclone agreed to sell an additional 5,333,334 shares of Series B-1 preferred convertible stock at a price of $1.50 per share in two closings. Included in the terms of the Series B-1 Agreement were certain rights granted to the holders that obligated Theraclone to deliver additional shares of convertible preferred stock at a specified price in the future. The rights to purchase additional shares were recorded as a liability at the time of issuance, in accordance with guidance applicable to freestanding instruments on shares that are redeemable, at the estimated fair value of the obligation on the date of issuance with their carrying values adjusted at each reporting date for any changes in their estimated fair values. Subsequent changes in carrying value are recorded as financing expense (income) in the statements of operations.

Theraclone estimated the fair value of its preferred stock forward contract as of June 30, 2013 using an OPM that employed the following assumptions as of June 30, 2013; the volatility of 55%, expected life of 0.92 years, a 6% annual dividend, and a risk-free interest rate of 0.13%. The difference between the concluded Fair Value of the Series B-1 shares of $1.48 and the future obligation of $1.50 represents a liability to the investors and is thus recorded as an asset of Theraclone at June 30, 2013. To calculate the present value of this asset, the $.02 per share difference was discounted to a present value employing the weighted average cost of capital of Theraclone of 24%.

Financial Operations Overview

Revenue

Theraclone has not generated any revenue from product sales. Theraclone’s revenue since inception through June 30, 2013, which has totaled $38.0 million, has been primarily from upfront payments, research funding and development milestones received from collaboration and license agreements with Zenyaku Kogyo, Pfizer and IAVI. Theraclone recognizes revenue from upfront payments ratably over the term of Theraclone’s estimated period of performance under the agreements. In addition to receiving upfront and research funding payments, Theraclone may also be entitled to milestone payments upon achievement of predefined objectives and royalties ranging from the single digits to low double digits on commercial sales. If there was substantive uncertainty that the event would be achieved when the agreement was entered into, then such payments are recorded as revenue if and when Theraclone achieves the associated milestone.

Research and Development

Theraclone expenses research and development costs as incurred. Research and development expense consists of costs incurred to discover, perform preclinical research on and develop drug candidates, including

224


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

salaries and stock-based compensation expense for research and development personnel, facility-related expenses, laboratory supplies and consumables, and outside contracted services, including clinical trial costs, manufacturing and process development costs, research costs, outside consulting services and other external costs.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expense consists primarily of salaries, stock-based compensation expense and other related costs for personnel in executive, finance and accounting functions and outside contracted services for information technology, corporate communications and human resource functions. Theraclone also expenses patent costs and expenses associated with maintaining its intellectual property as incurred. Other costs include facility costs not otherwise included in research and development expense, insurance, and professional fees for legal, audit and accounting services.

Other Income and Expense

Other income and expense includes the change in the fair value of the convertible preferred stock warrant liability and the preferred stock forward contract and interest expense.

Income Taxes

Theraclone is subject to U.S. federal income taxes. As of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2013, Theraclone did not have taxable income and, therefore, no tax liability or expense has been recorded in Theraclone’s financial statements. Theraclone has provided a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2011 and 2012 and June 30, 2013, because there is significant uncertainty surrounding its ability to realize the deferred tax assets in the future.

Results of Operations

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012

The following table summarizes results of operations with respect to the items set forth below for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, in thousands, together with the percentage change in those items.

       
  For the Six Months Ended June 30,
     2012   2013   $ Change   % Change
Revenue   $ 4,167     $ 4,495     $ 328       8 % 
Research and development     6,594       5,608       (986 )      (15 )% 
General and administrative     1,100       1,390       290       26 % 
Change in fair value of financial instruments           228       228       N/A  
Interest expense     (37 )      (107 )      (70 )      186 % 

Revenues

Theraclone’s revenue increased by $328,000, or 8%, in the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012. The increase is primarily the result of an increase in revenue of $2.1 million earned under the antibody discovery collaboration with Pfizer upon termination of the second infectious disease program in March 2013 resulting in recognition of all remaining deferred revenue. In addition, revenue from the IAVI collaboration increased $522,000 as Theraclone initiated an additional discovery program under the collaboration related to the identification of HIV antibodies. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in revenue from the first infectious disease program under the Pfizer collaboration of $900,000 which was completed in 2012 and a decrease in revenue of $800,000 for the cancer program under the Pfizer collaboration for which a majority of the work was performed in 2012. Increases in revenue were further offset by a reduction in revenue of $573,000 from the TCN-032 license and development collaboration with Zenyaku Kogyo as a result of completion of a substantial portion of the development activities in 2012, including completion of the TCN-032 Phase 1 clinical trial and initiating and completing the majority of the subject enrollment portion of the Phase 2a clinical trial in 2012.

Theraclone expects revenue associated with the Pfizer collaboration to decrease in the future, because Theraclone has completed work on the first infectious disease program and has nearly completed work on the

225


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

initial cancer program. Additional funding under this collaboration will depend on whether Pfizer decides to initiate another research program or progress the antibodies Theraclone has delivered into further preclinical and clinical development. Revenue from Theraclone’s collaboration with Zenyaku Kogyo will decrease for the foreseeable future as it has completed the Phase 2a clinical trial and future funding consists of payments for achievement of clinical development and regulatory milestones.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development activities can be divided into research and preclinical programs and clinical development programs, which currently include TCN-032 and TCN-202. The estimated costs associated with research, preclinical programs and clinical development programs approximate the following:

       
  For the Six Months Ended June 30,
     2012   2013   $ Change   % Change
Research and preclinical programs   $ 3,376     $ 3,008     $ (368 )      (11 )% 
Clinical development programs
                                   
TCN-032     1,311       1,592       281       21 % 
TCN-202     1,907       1,008       (899 )      (47 )% 
Total clinical development programs     3,218       2,600       (618 )      (19 )% 
Total research and development programs     6,594       5,608       (986 )      (15 )% 

Theraclone’s research and development expenses decreased by $986,000, or 15%, in the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012. Research and development expenses from research and preclinical programs decreased in the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012 primarily due to a reduction in expenses incurred under Theraclone’s antibody discovery programs with Pfizer, as a substantial portion of the research on the cancer program and all research on the infectious disease program were completed in 2012.

Research and development expenses from clinical development programs decreased in the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012 primarily due to lower clinical development and drug manufacturing costs for Theraclone’s clinical stage programs. The TCN-202 Phase 1 clinical trial was completed in the first quarter of 2013 resulting in lower expenses in the six months ended June 30, 2013. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in cost due to the initiation of the TCN-032 Phase 2a clinical trial in the third quarter of 2012 which continued through the second quarter of 2013.

Theraclone expects research and development expenses to increase in the future due to increases in manufacturing and clinical development costs related to its clinical programs, as well as the advancement of its discovery programs.

General and Administrative Expenses

Theraclone’s general and administrative expenses were $1.1 million in the first six months of 2012 compared to $1.4 million for the first six months of 2013, an increase of $290,000, or 26%, primarily due to higher legal fees and other costs related to the pending merger with PharmAthene.

Interest Expense

Theraclone’s interest expense was $37,000 in the first six months of 2012 compared to $107,000 for the first six months of 2013, an increase of $70,000, or 186%, due to the drawdown of $3 million under its credit and security agreement with MidCap Financial and Silicon Valley Bank in March 2013 and partially offset by a reduction in interest as a result of the payment in full of the term loan with General Electric Capital Corporation. Theraclone expects interest expense to increase in the future due to an increase in its debt from MidCap Financial and Silicon Valley Bank and the expiration of the interest only period in December 2013.

Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair value of Theraclone’s preferred stock warrant liability decreased by $41,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012, primarily due to a change in the estimated value of Theraclone’s Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock.

226


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The fair value of the preferred stock forward contract decreased by $187,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2013. The decrease is due to a change in the estimated value of Theraclone’s Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock. The decrease in value of the preferred stock forward contract corresponded with a change in the recorded balance from a liability at the time of issuance to an asset at June 30, 2013.

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011

The following table summarizes results of operations with respect to the items set forth below for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, in thousands, together with the percentage change in those items.

       
  For the Years Ended December 31,
     2011   2012   $ Change   % Change
Revenue   $ 8,384     $ 19,360     $ 10,976       131 % 
Research and development     14,816       19,611       4,795       32 % 
General and administrative     1,827       2,461       634       35 % 
Change in fair value of financial instruments     4       3       (1 )      -25 % 
Interest expense     (104 )      (69 )      35       -33 % 

Revenue

Theraclone’s revenue increased approximately $11.0 million, or 131%, in the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase was the result of an increase of $6.2 million from the antibody discovery collaboration with Pfizer and an increase of $5.3 million from the TCN-032 license and development collaboration with Zenyaku Kogyo. The increase in revenue from the Zenyaku collaboration is a result of completion of a substantial portion of the development activities in 2012, including completion the TCN-032 Phase 1 clinical trial and initiating and completing the majority of the subject enrollment portion of the Phase 2a trial. The increase in revenue under the Pfizer collaboration was due to (i) an increase in revenue of $3.6 million on the first infectious disease program which was completed in December 2012, resulting in all remaining revenue related to this program being recognized in 2012, (ii) completion of a substantial portion of the research on the cancer program in 2012, resulting in a $2.3 million increase in revenue and (iii) initiation of the second infectious disease program in the fourth quarter of 2012 resulting in a $300,000 increase in revenue. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in revenue of $500,000 under the collaboration with IAVI.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development activities can be divided into research and preclinical programs and clinical development programs, which currently include TCN-032 and TCN-202. The estimated costs associated with research/preclinical programs and clinical development programs are as follows:

       
  For the Year Ended December 31,
     2011   2012   $ Change   % Change
Research and preclinical programs   $ 6,994     $ 6,640     $ (354 )      -5 % 
Clinical development programs
                                   
TCN-032     3,820       8,264       4,444       116 % 
TCN-202     4,002       4,707       705       18 % 
Total clinical development programs     7,822       12,971       5,149       66 % 
Total research and development programs     14,816       19,611       4,795       32 % 

Theraclone’s research and development expenses increased by $4.8 million, or 32%, in the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. Research and development expenses from research and preclinical programs decreased $354,000, or 5%, in the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the year ended December 31, 2011 primarily due to (i) a reduction in expenses incurred to acquire donor samples for the I-STAR platform, (ii) a reduction in the acquisition of laboratory supplies and (iii) depreciation of laboratory equipment, partially offset by an increase in the cost of external research services.

227


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Research and development expenses from clinical development programs increased by $5.1 million, or 66%, in the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the year ended December 31, 2011 primarily due to clinical development expenses associated with the Phase 2a viral challenge trial for TCN-032 and the Phase 1 trial for TCN-202.

Theraclone expects research and development expenses to increase in the future due to increases in manufacturing and clinical development costs related to its clinical programs, as well as the advancement of its discovery programs.

General and Administrative Expenses

Theraclone’s general and administrative expenses were $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, an increase of $634,000, or 35%, primarily due to the increase in salary and non-cash stock-based compensation expenses related to the expansion of Theraclone’s senior management team with the addition of a full-time Chief Executive Officer in December 2011 and a Chief Medical Officer in September 2011.

Interest Expense

Interest expense was $69,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $104,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011, a decrease of $35,000, or 33%, due to the scheduled maturity and payment in full of the remaining balance under the term loan with General Electric Capital Corporation.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since inception through June 30, 2013, Theraclone has financed its operations primarily through private placements of preferred stock, receiving aggregate proceeds totaling $51 million; borrowings under notes payable, receiving aggregate proceeds totaling $7.0 million; and payments from collaborative and license agreements with pharmaceutical companies and grant receipts, receiving aggregate proceeds of $38.5 million.

   
  December 31, 2012   June 30,
2013
     ($ in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 5,426     $ 7,215  
Working capital     774       4,630  
Total stockholders' deficit     58,443       61,022  

As of June 30, 2013, Theraclone had $7.2 million in cash and cash equivalents. Theraclone’s cash equivalents consist principally of money market securities. Cash in excess of immediate requirements is invested with regard to liquidity and capital preservation. As of June 30, 2013, Theraclone had working capital of $4.6 million. In August 2013,Theraclone completed the second closing of its Series B-1 convertible preferred stock sale to certain current investors for $4.0 million and borrowed an additional $3.0 million under an existing credit and security agreement.

       
  Years Ended December 31,   Six months Ended June 30,
     2011   2012   2012   2013
     ($ in thousands)
Statement of Cash Flows Data
                                   
Cash provided by (used in)
                                   
Operating activities   $ (4,018 )    $ (9,766 )    $ (7,068 )    $ (4,491 ) 
Investing activities     (1,167 )      (289 )      (130 )      (201 ) 
Financing activities     11,838       (318 )      6       6,481  
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents     6,653       (10,373 )      (7,192 )      1,789  

228


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $4.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013. The net loss of $2.4 million was offset by non-cash charges of $289,000 for depreciation and amortization, $101,000 for stock-based compensation and $228,000 for the change in the fair value of financial instruments and increased by net changes in Theraclone’s operating assets and liabilities of $2.3 million. The net change in Theraclone’s operating assets and liabilities included a decrease in deferred revenue of $3.3 million and accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $494,000, partially offset by a decrease in accounts receivable of $1.4 million.

Net cash used in operating activities was $7.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The net loss of $3.6 million was offset by non-cash charges of $476,000 for depreciation and amortization and $110,000 for stock-based compensation and increased by net changes in Theraclone’s operating assets and liabilities of $4.1 million. The net change in Theraclone’s operating assets and liabilities included a decrease in deferred revenue of $1.9 million and accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $480,000, partially offset by a decrease in prepaid expenses of $1.9 million.

Net cash used in operating activities was $9.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The net loss of $2.8 million was offset by non-cash charges of $836,000 for depreciation and amortization and $188,000 for stock-based compensation and increased by net changes in Theraclone’s operating assets and liabilities of $8.0 million. The net change in Theraclone’s operating assets and liabilities included a decrease in deferred revenue of $7.3 million and an increase in accounts receivable of $1.9 million partially offset by an increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $573,000 and a decrease in prepaid expenses.

Net cash used in operating activities was $4.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The net loss of $8.4 million was offset by non-cash charges of $948,000 for depreciation and amortization and $188,000 for stock-based compensation and decreased by net changes in Theraclone’s operating assets and liabilities of $3.2 million. The net change in Theraclone’s operating assets and liabilities included a decrease in accounts receivable of $4.0 million and an increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $308,000, partially offset by an a decrease in deferred revenue of $500,000 and an increase in prepaid expenses of $485,000.

Theraclone expects revenue associated with the Pfizer collaboration to decrease in the future, because Theraclone has completed work on the first infectious disease program and has nearly completed work on the initial cancer program. Additional funding under this collaboration will depend on whether Pfizer decides to initiate another research program. Revenue from Theraclone’s collaboration with Zenyaku Kogyo will decrease for the foreseeable future as Theraclone has completed the Phase 2a trial and future funding consists of payments for achievement of clinical development and regulatory milestones that are not expected to occur in the near term.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $201,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and $130,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Cash used in investing activities was related primarily to Theraclone’s acquisition of laboratory equipment and supplies to support the growth of Theraclone’s research and development activities.

Net cash used in investing activities was $289,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Cash used in investing activities was related primarily to Theraclone’s acquisition of laboratory equipment and supplies and leasehold improvements to support the growth of Theraclone’s research and development activities.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $6.5 million, compared to net cash provided by financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2012 of $6,000. In the six months ended June 30, 2013, financing activities consisted of $3.9 million of proceeds from the issuance of Series B-1 convertible preferred stock and $2.8 million of proceeds from issuance of a note

229


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

payable, partially offset by $275,000 of debt repayment. In the six months ended June 30, 2012, financing activities consisted primarily of $382,000 from the issuance of a note payable, offset by $376,000 of debt repayment.

Net cash used in financing activities was $318,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012 and cash provided by financing activities was $11.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. In 2012, financing activities consisted primarily of proceeds of $382,000 from the issuance of notes payable, offset by $687,000 of debt repayment. In 2011, financing activities consisted of proceeds of $11.6 million from the issuance of Series B preferred stock and $1.1 million of proceeds from issuance of notes payable, partially offset by $866,000 of debt repayment.

In March 2013, Theraclone entered into the Series B-1 Agreement with current stockholders. Under the Series B-1 Agreement, existing Series A and B convertible preferred stock were converted into shares of Series A-1 and B-1, respectively, and Theraclone agreed to sell an additional 5,333,334 shares of Series B-1 convertible preferred stock at a price of $1.50 per share in two closings. The first closing occurred in March 2013 and the second closing occurred in August 2013. Certain investors who participated beyond their pro rata share, received one Series B-1 warrant for each share of Series B-1 stock purchased above their pro rata amount. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.01 per share. These warrants are exercisable at any time before their expiration in March 2020. Theraclone issued 74,139 and 465,228 series B-1 warrants in the first and second closings, respectively. Upon the closing of the merger, these warrants will be assumed by PharmAthene and converted into warrants to purchase PharmAthene common stock.

In May 2011, Theraclone entered into a loan agreement for equipment purchases with Silicon Valley Bank. Under the terms of this loan agreement, Theraclone borrowed $1.5 million in three separate tranches from May 2011 to May 2012 that bear interest at the rate of 5.5% per annum. The three borrowings mature at dates ranging from March 2014 through November 2014 and are collateralized by the laboratory and office equipment purchased with the proceeds of the borrowings. The outstanding balance at June 30, 2013 was $556,000 (excluding $12,000 of unamortized discount). The loan agreement also contains events of default that are customary for this type of loan, including payment defaults, solvency defaults and the occurrence of certain material adverse change events. The occurrence of an event of default could result in the acceleration of the obligations under the loan agreement. The loan agreement could restrict Theraclone’s ability to, among other things, sell the assets securing the debt, engage in a merger or change in control transaction, incur debt, pay cash dividends, or make investments without first obtaining the bank’s consent.

In March 2013, Theraclone entered into a credit and security agreement with MidCap Financial and Silicon Valley Bank under which it can borrow up to $6 million for working capital purposes. Theraclone borrowed $3 million under the credit and security agreement in March 2013, and borrowed the remaining $3 million in August 2013. The credit facility has a term of 45 months and bears interest at a rate of 7%, with an interest-only period of nine months from initiation of the agreement. The credit and security agreement is secured by substantially all of Theraclone’s assets, with the exception of Theraclone’s intellectual property and the laboratory and office equipment purchased with the proceeds of the loan agreement with Silicon Valley Bank.

The credit and security agreement also contains events of default that are customary for credit facilities of this type, including payment defaults, financial condition and solvency defaults and the occurrence of certain material adverse change events. The occurrence of an event of default could result in the acceleration of the obligations under the loan agreement. The credit and security agreement could restrict Theraclone’s ability to, among other things, sell certain assets, engage in a merger or change in control transaction, incur debt, pay cash dividends, and make investments without first obtaining the bank’s consent.

Theraclone will need to raise additional capital to support its operations, and such capital may not be available to Theraclone on acceptable terms, if at all. If Theraclone is unable to raise additional capital when needed, it may be unable to continue development of its product candidates or could be required to delay, scale back, or eliminate some or all of its development programs and other operations.

Theraclone believes that its current cash and cash equivalents will be adequate to fund operations into the second quarter of 2014. The key assumption underlying this estimate is that expenditures related to salaries

230


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

and wages, continued preclinical, manufacturing and clinical development of its product candidates and legal and accounting fees associated with the merger with PharmAthene during this period will be within forecasted levels.

Theraclone’s forecast of the period of time that its financial resources will be adequate to support operations is a forward-looking statement and involves risks and uncertainties, and actual results could vary as a result of a number of factors, including the factors discussed in the section entitled “RISK FACTORS” of this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation. In light of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with the development and commercialization of Theraclone’s product candidates, Theraclone is unable to estimate the amounts of increased capital outlays and operating expenses that will be associated with product development. Theraclone’s future funding requirements will depend on many factors, including:

the ability to raise capital in the debt/equity markets or through strategic collaborations;
the costs and timing associated with the closing of the merger;
the scope, rate of progress, results and costs of its preclinical testing, clinical trials, and other research and development activities;
the number of programs Theraclone pursues;
the cost of preparing, filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent claims and other intellectual property rights;
the cost of establishing clinical and commercial supplies of its product candidates;
the extent to which Theraclone acquires or invests in businesses, products or technologies; and
the cost, timing, and outcomes of regulatory approvals.

Related-Party Transactions

For a description of Theraclone’s related-party transactions, see the discussion under the heading “RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS FOLLOWING THE MERGER” in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Since its inception, Theraclone has not engaged in any off-balance sheet arrangements, including the use of structured finance, special purpose entities or variable interest entities.

231


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DESCRIPTION OF PHARMATHENE CAPITAL STOCK

The following is a summary of the rights of PharmAthene’s common stock and preferred stock. This summary is not complete. For more detailed information, see PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, and Bylaws.

Common Stock

Under PharmAthene’s current Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, it is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.0001 per share. As of August 2, 2013, PharmAthene had 52,310,913 shares of common stock outstanding. PharmAthene does not currently have in effect a stockholder rights plan.

Holders of PharmAthene’s common stock are entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held of record on all matters to be voted on by stockholders, except as otherwise provided by law or in any preferred stock designation. PharmAthene’s Bylaws specify that, except as otherwise required by law or its Certificate of Incorporation, the presence in person or by proxy of holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote at a meeting of stockholders will be necessary, and will constitute a quorum, for the transaction of business at such meeting. PharmAthene’s Bylaws furthermore specify that all elections of directors will be determined by a plurality of the votes and that, except as otherwise provided by law or in the Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws, any other matter will be determined by the vote of a majority of the shares which are voted with regard to it. PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation provides that directors of PharmAthene in their discretion may submit any contract or act for approval or ratification at any annual meeting of the stockholders or at any meeting of the stockholders called for the purpose of considering any such act or contract, and any contract or act that is approved or ratified by the vote of the holders of a majority of PharmAthene’s stock that is represented in person or by proxy at such meeting and entitled to vote thereat will be as valid and binding upon PharmAthene and upon all the stockholders as though it had been approved or ratified by every stockholder of PharmAthene. Holders of PharmAthene’s common stock have no conversion, preemptive or other subscription rights and there are no sinking fund or redemption provisions applicable to the common stock.

There is no cumulative voting with respect to the election of directors, with the result that the holders of more than 50% of the shares voting for the election of directors can elect all of the directors then up for election. Holders of PharmAthene’s common stock are entitled to receive dividends when, as and if declared by its Board of Directors out of funds legally available therefor. In the event of PharmAthene’s liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of common stock are entitled to share in all assets remaining which are available for distribution to them after payment of liabilities and after provision has been made for each class of stock, if any, having preference over the common stock.

The transfer agent and registrar for PharmAthene’s common stock is Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, New York, New York.

Preferred Stock

Under PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation, it is currently authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.0001 per share. As of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation, PharmAthene had no shares of preferred stock outstanding.

Under PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation, its Board of Directors is expressly granted authority to issue shares of preferred stock, in one or more series, and to fix for each series such voting powers, full or limited, and such designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights and such qualifications, limitations or restrictions as it may determine in the resolution or resolutions providing for the issue of such series (to which it also refers as a “preferred stock designation”) and as may be permitted by the DGCL. The number of authorized shares of preferred stock may be increased or decreased (but not below the number of shares of preferred stock then outstanding) by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of all of the then outstanding shares of PharmAthene’s capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class, without a separate vote of the holders of the preferred stock, or any series of preferred stock, unless a vote of any such holders is required pursuant to any preferred stock designation.

232


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The rights and terms relating to any new series of preferred stock could adversely affect the voting power or other rights of the holders of the common stock or could be utilized, under certain circumstances, as a method of discouraging, delaying or preventing a change in control of PharmAthene, as discussed below.

Anti-Takeover Effects of Provisions of PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws and Delaware Law

Some provisions of PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaws and Delaware law contain provisions that could make the following transactions more difficult: an acquisition of PharmAthene by means of a tender offer; an acquisition of PharmAthene by means of a proxy contest or otherwise; or removal of PharmAthene's incumbent officers and directors. It is possible that these provisions could make it more difficult to accomplish or could deter transactions that PharmAthene stockholders may otherwise consider to be in their best interest or in PharmAthene's best interests, including transactions that might result in a premium over the market price for PharmAthene's shares.

These provisions, summarized below, are designed to discourage coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids. These provisions also are designed to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of PharmAthene to first negotiate with the PharmAthene Board of Directors. The PharmAthene Board of Directors believes that the benefits of increased protection of its potential ability to negotiate with the proponent of an unfriendly or unsolicited proposal to acquire or restructure PharmAthene outweigh the disadvantages of discouraging these proposals because negotiation of these proposals could result in an improvement of their terms.

In addition, following the merger, the combined company’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws contain provisions, such as undesignated preferred stock, that could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire the combined company without the consent of its Board of Directors. Further, the combined company’s Bylaws require the combined company to call a special meeting at the request of its stockholders only upon the written request of the holders of at least 10% of all outstanding shares entitled to vote on the action proposed to be taken. These provisions may have the effect of preventing or hindering any attempts by the stockholders of the combined company to replace its Board of Directors or management.

Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws

The following provisions in PharmAthene's Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws could delay or discourage transactions involving an actual or potential change in control or change in PharmAthene's management, including transactions that PharmAthene stockholders may otherwise consider to be in their best interest or in PharmAthene's best interests, including transactions that might result in a premium over the market price for PharmAthene's shares.

Authorized But Unissued Capital Stock.  PharmAthene has common stock and undesignated preferred stock available for future issuance without stockholder approval, subject to any limitations imposed by the NYSE MKT. PharmAthene may use these additional shares for a variety of corporate purposes, including for future public offerings to raise additional capital or to facilitate corporate acquisitions or for payment as a dividend on its capital stock. The existence of unissued and unreserved capital stock may enable the PharmAthene Board of Directors to issue shares to persons friendly to current management that could render more difficult or discourage a third-party attempt to obtain control of PharmAthene by means of a merger, tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise, thereby protecting the continuity of PharmAthene's management. In addition, the ability to authorize undesignated preferred stock makes it possible for the PharmAthene Board of Directors to issue preferred stock with voting or other rights or preferences that could impede the success of any attempt to change control of PharmAthene. These and other provisions may have the effect of deferring hostile takeovers or delaying changes in control or management of PharmAthene.
Stockholder Meetings.  PharmAthene's Bylaws provide that a special meeting of stockholders may be called only by the Board of Directors or by the Chief Executive Officer, and shall be called by the Chief Executive Officer, President or the Secretary upon the written request of the majority of the directors or upon the written request of the holders of at least 10% of all outstanding shares entitled to vote on the action proposed to be taken.

233


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Delaware Anti-Takeover Law

As a Delaware corporation, PharmAthene is subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. This law prohibits a publicly-held Delaware corporation from engaging in any business combination with any interested stockholder for a period of three years following the date that the stockholder became an interested stockholder unless:

prior to the date of the transaction, the Board of Directors of the corporation approved either the business combination or the transaction which resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder;
upon consummation of the transaction which resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder owned at least 85 percent of the voting stock of the corporation outstanding at the time the transaction commenced, excluding for purposes of determining the number of shares outstanding those shares owned by persons who are directors and also officers and by employee stock plans in which employee participants do not have the right to determine confidentially whether shares held subject to the plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer; or
on or subsequent to the date of the transaction, the business combination is approved by the Board of Directors and authorized at an annual or special meeting of stockholders, and not by written consent, by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the outstanding voting stock which is not owned by the interested stockholder.

Section 203 defines “business combination” to include:

any merger or consolidation involving the corporation and the interested stockholder;
any sale, transfer, pledge or other disposition of 10 percent or more of the corporation's assets involving the interested stockholder;
in general, any transaction that results in the issuance or transfer by the corporation of any of its stock to the interested stockholder; or
the receipt by the interested stockholder of the benefit of any loans, advances, guarantees, pledges or other financial benefits provided by or through the corporation.

COMPARISON OF RIGHTS OF STOCKHOLDERS

Both PharmAthene and Theraclone are incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware, accordingly the rights of the stockholders of each company are currently, and will continue to be, governed by the DGCL and their respective Certificates of Incorporation and Bylaws. If the merger is completed, Theraclone stockholders will become stockholders of PharmAthene, and their rights will be governed by the DGCL, the Certificate of Incorporation of PharmAthene and the Bylaws of PharmAthene. The rights of PharmAthene contained in the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of PharmAthene differ from the rights of Theraclone stockholders under the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of Theraclone.

The following is a summary of the material differences between the rights of PharmAthene stockholders and Theraclone stockholders under the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of PharmAthene, the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of Theraclone, and, to the extent applicable, the DGCL. While PharmAthene and Theraclone believe that this summary covers the material differences, this summary may not contain all of the information that is important to you. This summary is not intended to be a complete discussion of the respective rights of PharmAthene stockholders and Theraclone stockholders and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the various documents of PharmAthene and Theraclone that are referred to in this summary. You should carefully read this entire proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation and the other documents that PharmAthene and Theraclone refer to in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation for a more complete understanding of the differences between being a stockholder of PharmAthene and being a stockholder of Theraclone.

234


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

   
  Theraclone   PharmAthene
Authorized Capital
Stock
  Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation currently authorizes the issuance of 98,146,302 shares of capital stock, consisting of two classes, common stock and preferred stock. 60,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, and 38,146,302 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share, are authorized. 4,765,145 shares of the authorized preferred stock are designated as Series A-1 convertible preferred stock and 33,381,157 shares of the authorized preferred stock are designated as Series B-1 convertible preferred stock.   PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation currently authorizes the issuance of 101,000,000 shares of capital stock, consisting of two classes, common stock and preferred stock. 100,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.0001 par value per share, are currently authorized. The PharmAthene Board of Directors is asking stockholders to approve an amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation that would increase the number of authorized shares of capital stock to 176,000,000, consisting of 175,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.0001 par value per share.
Redemption   Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation provides that at any time on or after July 30, 2017, holders of at least a majority of the then outstanding shares of preferred stock have the right to require Theraclone to redeem all of the outstanding shares of preferred stock out of funds lawfully available at a price equal to the price per share paid for the preferred stock, plus all accrued and unpaid dividends.   Holders of shares of PharmAthene common stock do not have any redemption rights. PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation provides that the PharmAthene Board of Directors may issue shares of preferred stock and in connection with such issuance fix such designations, preferences and relative, participating, option or other special rights as shall be stated and expressed in the resolution or resolutions adopted by the PharmAthene Board of Directors providing for such issuance and as may be permitted by the DGCL.

235


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

   
  Theraclone   PharmAthene
Dividends   Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation provides that holders of the Series A-1 Preferred Stock and the Series B-1 Preferred Stock are entitled to receive, out of funds legally available therefor, when, as and if declared by the Theraclone board of directors, cash dividends at a rate per annum of $0.06 per share and $0.09 per share, respectively. All such dividends shall accrue, whether or not earned or declared, and shall be cumulative, non-compounding and payable (i) when and as declared by the Theraclone board of directors, (ii) upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the corporation or any Deemed Liquidation Event (as defined in Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation), and (iii) upon redemption of the preferred stock by the corporation.   Under the DGCL, except as set forth in the Certificate of Incorporation, a corporation is generally permitted to declare and pay dividends out of surplus (defined as the excess, if any, of net assets over capital) or, if no surplus exists, out of net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared and/or the preceding fiscal year. However, the directors of a corporation may not pay any dividends out of net profits if the capital of the corporation has been reduced to an amount less than the aggregate amount of capital represented by the issued and outstanding stock of all classes having a preference upon the distribution of assets.

236


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

   
  Theraclone   PharmAthene
Rights on Liquidation   Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation provides that where approval of stockholders is required by law, the written consent or the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the then outstanding shares of preferred stock shall be required to authorize the corporation to commence a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the corporation or any Deemed Liquidation Event (as defined in Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation).
Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation further provides that upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the corporation or any Deemed Liquidation Event (as defined in Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation), the holders of preferred stock shall be paid an amount equal to (i) the price per share of preferred stock, plus (ii) in the case of each such share, an amount equal to all accrued but unpaid dividends thereon (whether declare or not declared). If Theraclone’s assets are insufficient to make payment in full to all holders of shares of preferred stock, then such assets shall be distributed among the holders of shares of preferred stock ratably in proportion to the full amounts to which they would otherwise be respectively entitled.
The remaining assets of the corporation available for distribution shall be distributed among the holders of shares of common and preferred stock in an amount per share as would have been payable had each share of preferred stock been converted to common stock immediately prior to such liquidation event.
  Under the DGCL, in case of a dissolution of PharmAthene, the holders of common stock are entitled to receive the assets of PharmAthene available for distribution subject to any preferential liquidation right on any then outstanding preferred stock. PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation provides that the PharmAthene Board of Directors may issue shares of preferred stock and in connection with such issuance fix such designations, preferences and relative, participating, option or other special rights as shall be stated and expressed in the resolution or resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors providing for such issuance and as may be permitted by the DGCL.

237


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

   
  Theraclone   PharmAthene
Conversion Rights   Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation provides that each holder of preferred stock has the option, at any time (except that in the case of any redemption pursuant to Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation, the right of conversion of the shares designated for redemption shall terminate immediately prior to such redemption, unless the purchase price for such redemption is not paid when due, in which case the right of conversion for such shares shall continue until such price is paid in full), to convert any shares of preferred stock held into shares of common stock according to a conversion formula set forth in Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation.
A mandatory conversion of the preferred stock shall occur in the event (i) the corporation effects a firm commitment underwritten public offering in which the price of the common stock is at least $5.00 per share and such offering results in at least $50,000,000 of gross proceeds to the corporation, (ii) in the case of Series A-1 preferred stock, the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the then outstanding Series A-1 preferred stock consent to a conversion, (iii) in the case of Series B-1 preferred stock, the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the then outstanding Series B-1 preferred stock consent to a conversion, (iv) in the case of the preferred stock, the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the then outstanding preferred stock
  Holders of shares of PharmAthene common stock do not have any conversion rights. PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation provides that the PharmAthene Board of Directors may issue shares of preferred stock and in connection with such issuance fix such designations, preferences and relative, participating, option or other special rights as shall be stated and expressed in the resolution or resolutions adopted by the PharmAthene Board of Directors providing for such issuance and as may be permitted by the DGCL.

238


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

   
  Theraclone   PharmAthene
     consent to a conversion, (v) if the holders of shares of preferred stock does not participate in the Qualified Financing (as defined in Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation) by purchasing in the aggregate in such Qualified Financing such holder’s entire Pro Rata Amount (as defined in Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation), or (vi) if the holders of shares of preferred stock and common stock issued in the Exchange (as defined in Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation) fails to purchase at the Second Closing (as defined in Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation) the number of shares of Series B-1 preferred stock set forth opposite such holder’s name on Exhibit A to the Purchase Agreement (as defined in Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation). The conversion formula for the mandatory conversion of preferred stock is also set forth in Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation.
In addition, the conversion price of each applicable series of preferred stock are subject to adjustments as further provided in Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation.
    

239


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

   
  Theraclone   PharmAthene
Stockholder Approval Rights   Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation provides that, unless otherwise provided by law, preferred stock shall vote together with all other classes and series of stock of the corporation as a single class on all actions to be taken by the stockholders of the corporation, including amending the certificate of incorporation of the corporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock. Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation also provides that each holder of outstanding shares of preferred stock shall be entitled to cast the number of votes equal to the number of shares of common stock (including fraction of a share) into which the shares of preferred stock held by such holder are convertible as of the record date of determining stockholders entitled to vote on such matter. Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation provides that where approval of stockholders is required by law, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the then outstanding preferred stock shall be required to authorize the corporation (i) to (a) increase or decrease the total number of authorized shares of common stock or preferred stock or (b) create, or authorize the creation of, issue or sell, or obligate the corporation to issue or sell, any other security having a preference senior to or on a parity with the preferred stock with respect to dividends, rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the corporation, or redemption, whether any such creation, authorization, issuance or sale shall be by means of amendment to Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation or otherwise; (ii) to liquidate, dissolve or wind up the corporation, whether voluntary or involuntary, or effect any Deemed   PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation provides that, except as otherwise required by law or as otherwise provided in any preferred stock designation, the holders of PharmAthene’s common stock have exclusive possession of all voting power and each share of common stock has one vote. The Certificate of Incorporation provides that the PharmAthene Board of Directors may issue shares of preferred stock and in connection with such issuance fix such voting powers, full or limited, as shall be stated and expressed in the resolution or resolutions adopted by the PharmAthene Board of Directors providing for such issuance and as may be permitted bythe DGCL. The Certificate of Incorporation furthermore states that the number of authorized shares of preferred stock may be increased or decreased (but not below the number of shares of preferred stock then outstanding) by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority in the voting power or all of the then outstanding shares of PharmAthene’s capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class, without a separate vote of the holders of the preferred stock, or any series of preferred stock, unless a vote of any such holders is required under any preferred stock designation.
The PharmAthene Certificate of Incorporation provides that any contract or act that is approved or ratified by the vote of the holders of a majority of PharmAthene’s stock which is represented in person or by proxy at the meeting at which the approval or ratification is considered, and entitled to vote thereat (provided that a lawful quorum of stockholders is represented in person or by proxy) is as valid and binding upon PharmAthene and its stockholders as though it had been approved or ratified by every PharmAthene stockholder,

240


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

   
  Theraclone   PharmAthene
     Liquidation Event (as defined in Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation); (iii) to amend, alter, repeal or add any provision to Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws, including to change the rights of the preferred stock; (iv) to purchase or set aside any sum for the purchase of, redeem or otherwise acquire or pay any dividend or make any distribution on, any shares of stock other than the preferred stock consistent with the terms of Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation, other than the purchase of shares of common stock from former employees or former consultants of the corporation who acquired such shares directly from the corporation, if each such purchase is made pursuant to contractual rights held by the corporation relating to the termination of employment of such former employer or the business relationship of such former consultant that are approved by the Theraclone board of directors; (v) to redeem or acquire any shares of preferred stock except as expressly authorized by Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation; (vi) to change the rights of the holders of the preferred stock if the effect would be detrimental or adverse in any manner with respect to the rights of the holders of such series of preferred stock; (vii) to materially change the nature of the corporation’s business; (viii) to materially amend or alter the corporation’s equity incentive plan,   whether or not the contract or act would otherwise be open to legal attack because of directors’ interests, or for any other reason. PharmAthene’s Bylaws provide that all elections will be determined by plurality votes and that, except as otherwise provided by law or in the Certificate of Incorporation or the Bylaws, any other matter will be determined by the vote of a majority of the shares which are voted with regard to it.
PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation furthermore provides that, if a compromise or arrangement is proposed between PharmAthene and its creditors or any class of them and/or between PharmAthene and its stockholders or any class of them, and if a majority in number representing ¾^ in value of the creditors or class of creditors, and/or of the stockholders or class of stockholders of PharmAthene, as the case may be, agree to any compromise or arrangement and to any reorganization of PharmAthene as a consequence of the compromise or arrangement, the compromise or arrangement and the reorganization, if sanctioned by the court to which application was made, is binding on all the creditors or class of creditors and/or stockholders or class of stockholders of PharmAthene, as the case may be, and also on PharmAthene.

241


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

   
  Theraclone   PharmAthene
     including to increase the aggregate number of shares issuable under allsuch equity plan above 9,753,966 shares of common stock; (ix) to incur indebtedness for borrowed funds, in a single transaction or related series of transactions, in principal amount at any time outstanding in excess of$150,000 other than any indebtedness incurred pursuant to that certain Credit and Security Agreement between the corporation, MidCap Funding III, LLC and certain lenders dated on or about the date of the filing of Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation; or (x) to reclassify any outstanding capital stock into shares having rights, preferences, privilege or priority senior to or on parity with the preferences of the preferred stock with respect to dividends, rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the corporation, or redemption, whether any such reclassification shall be by means of amendment to Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation or by merger, consolidation or otherwise.     

242


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

   
  Theraclone   PharmAthene
Number of Directors and Election   Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation provides that without the prior affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the then outstanding preferred stock, the corporation shall not increase or decrease the number of directors constituting the Theraclone board of directors to a number other than six. The holders of record of the shares of Series B-1 preferred stock, exclusively as a separate class, shall be entitled to elect four directors of the corporation and the holders of record of the shares of Series A-1 preferred stock, exclusively as a separate class, shall be entitled to elect the balance of the total number of directors of the corporation. Avacancy in any directorship filled by the holders of such class or series shall only be filled by the holders of such class or series.
Theraclone’s Bylaws provide that if any at any time, by reason of death or resignation or other cause, the corporation should have no directors in office, then any officer or any stockholder or an executor, administrator, trustee or guardian of a stockholder, or other fiduciary entrusted with like responsibility for the person or estate of a stockholder, may call a special meeting of stockholders in accordance with the provisions of Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws, or may apply to the Delaware Court of Chancery for a decree summarily ordering an election as provided in Section 211 of the DGCL. If at the time of filling any vacancy or any newly created directorship, the directors then in office shall
  PharmAthene’s Bylaws provide that the number of directors which will constitute the entire Board of Directors will be such number, not less than one nor more than nine, as shall be determined by the Board ofDirectors from time to time, provided that in the event the outstanding shares of stock are owned by fewer than three stockholders, the number of directors may be a number not less than the number of stockholders. Except in the case of a vacancy, the directors shall be elected at the annual meeting of stockholders. Except as otherwise provided by law, the Certificate of Incorporation, or the Bylaws, each director elected will serve until the next succeeding annual meeting of stockholders and until his successor is elected and qualified. Finally, PharmAthene’s Bylaws provide that newly created directorships resulting from an increase in the number of directors and vacancies occurring in the PharmAthene Board of Directors may be filled by vote of a majority of the directors then in office, even if less than a quorum exists. A director elected to fill a vacancy, including a vacancy created by a newly created directorship, shall serve until the next succeeding annual meeting of stockholders and until his successor is elected and qualified.

243


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

   
  Theraclone   PharmAthene
     constitute less than a majority of the whole board (as constituted immediately prior to such increase), the Delaware Court of Chancery may, upon application of any stockholders or stockholders holding at least ten percent of the total number of the shares at the time outstanding having the right to vote for such directors, summarily order an election to be held to fill any such vacancies or newly created directorships, or to replace the directors chosen by the directors then in office.     
Removal of Directors   Theraclone’s Bylaws provides that unless otherwise provided by law or by Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation, any director or the entire Theraclone board of directors may be removed, with or without cause, by the holders of a majority of the shares then entitled to vote at an election of directors. However, if the stockholders of the corporation are entitled to cumulative voting, if less than the entire Theraclone board of directors is to be removed, no director may be removed without cause if the votes cast against his removal would be sufficient to elect him if then cumulatively voted at an election of the entire Theraclone board of directors.   PharmAthene’s Bylaws provide that any of the directors may be removed for cause by vote of a majority of the PharmAthene Board of Directors. Any or all of the directors may be removed for cause or without cause by vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of each class of PharmAthene voting stock voting as a class.

244


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

   
  Theraclone   PharmAthene
Stockholder Action by Written Consent   Theraclone’s Bylaws provide that any action required or permitted to be taken at meeting of stockholders of a corporation may be taken without a meeting, without prior notice and without a vote if a consent in writing, setting forth the action so taken, is (i) signed by the holders of outstanding stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting and (ii) delivered to the corporation in accordance with Section 228(a) of the DGCL.   PharmAthene’s Bylaws provide that, whenever the vote of stockholders at a meeting is required or permitted in connection with any corporate action, the meeting and vote may be dispensed with if the action taken has the written consent of the holders of shares having at least the minimum number of votes required to authorize the action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote were present and voted.
Amendment of Charter and Bylaws   Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation provides that, in addition to any other vote required by law, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of all of the then-outstanding shares of preferred stock of the corporation, voting together as a single class, shall be required to amend, alter, repeal or add any provision to Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws, including to change the rights of the preferred stock.   Under the DGCL, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the PharmAthene capital stock outstanding and entitled to vote is required to approve an amendment to PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation. Under PharmAthene’s Bylaws, the Bylaws may be amended or repealed, and new Bylaws may be adopted, amended or repealed (a) at any regular or special meeting of stockholders, or (b) by the affirmative vote of a majority of the PharmAthene Board of Directors at any regular or special meeting of the PharmAthene Board of Directors.

245


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

   
  Theraclone   PharmAthene
Cumulative Voting   The DGCL states that the Certificate of Incorporation may provide for cumulative voting. Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation does not provide for cumulative voting.   The DGCL states that the Certificate of Incorporation may provide for cumulative voting. PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation does not provide for cumulative voting.
Limitation of Personal Liability of Directors   Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation provides that the personal liability of the directors for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director shall be eliminated. However, to the extent provided by applicable law, the foregoing shall not eliminate the liability of a director (i) for any breach of such director’s duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) under Section 174 of DGCL, or (iv) for any transaction from which such director derived an improper personal benefit.   PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation provides that directors are not personally liable for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty by such director as a director, except for liability (i) for any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) under Section 174 of the DGCL, or (iv) for any transaction from which such director derived an improper personal benefit. If the DGCL is amended to authorize corporate action further eliminating or limiting the personal liability of directors, then the liability of a director of PharmAthene will be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL, as so amended.
Indemnification of Officers and Directors   Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws provide that the corporation shall indemnify its officers and directors to the fullest extent permitted under DGCL.   PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws provide that PharmAthene, to the full extent permitted by Section 145 of the DGCL, as amended from time to time, shall indemnify all persons whom it may indemnify pursuant to that section, which persons include its directors and officers.

246


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

   
  Theraclone   PharmAthene
Special Meeting of Stockholders   Theraclone’s Bylaws provide that special meetings of the stockholders may be called, at any time, by (a) any one member of the Theraclone Board of Directors, including the Chairman of the Board, (b) the President or (c) by one more stockholders owning at least ten percent (10%) of the capital stock of Theraclone issued and outstanding, and entitled to vote.   PharmAthene’s Bylaws provide that special meetings of stockholders may be called at anytime for any purpose or purposes by the PharmAthene Board of Directors or by the Chief Executive Officer, and shall be called by the Chief Executive Officer, President or the Secretary upon the written request of the majority of the directors or upon the written request of the holders of at least 10% of all outstanding shares entitled to vote on the action proposed to be taken. A special meeting of stockholders called by the Board of Directors or the President, other than one required to be called by reason of a written request of stockholders, may be cancelled by the Board of Directors at any time not less than 24 hours before the scheduled commencement of the meeting.

Notice of Stockholder Meeting   Theraclone’s Bylaws provide that a written notice of the stockholders’ meeting shall be given to each stockholder entitled to vote at such meeting not less than ten nor more than sixty days before the date of the meeting. Such notice shall state the place (if any), date and hour of the meeting, and in the case of a special meeting, the purpose or purposes for which the meeting is called.   PharmAthene’s Bylaws provide that written notice of each annual meeting or special meeting of stockholders, stating the place, date and time of the meeting, and (i) in the case of a special meeting, the general nature of the business to be transacted, or (ii) in the case of the annual meeting, those matters that the PharmAthene Board of Directors, at the time of giving notice, intends to present for action by the stockholders, must be given in the manner set forth in the Bylaws not less than ten nor more than sixty days before the date of the meeting to each stockholder entitled to vote at the meeting. If directors are to be elected, the notice shall include the names of all nominees whom the PharmAthene Board of Directors intends, at the time of notice, to present for election. The notice shall also state the general nature of any proposed action to be taken at the meeting.

247


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

   
  Theraclone   PharmAthene
Quorum of Stockholder Meetings   Theraclone’s Bylaws provide that a majority of the shares of stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at any meeting of stockholders, the holders of which are present in person or represented by proxy, shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business except as otherwise provided by law or by Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation.   PharmAthene’s Bylaws provide that, except as otherwise required by law or the Certificate of Incorporation, the presence in person or by proxy of holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote at a meeting of stockholders will be necessary, and will constitute a quorum, for the transaction of business at such meeting.

Stockholder Preemptive Rights   The DGCL does not provide for stockholder preemptive rights, unless the Certificate of Incorporation provides otherwise. Certain holders of preferred stock have the right to acquire certain securities proposed to be issued by the corporation under circumstances pursuant to and in accordance with the terms and conditions of that certain amended and restated Investor Rights Agreement dated as of March 11, 2013 by and among the corporation and the other parties thereto.   The DGCL does not provide for stockholder preemptive rights, unless the Certificate of Incorporation provides otherwise. PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation provides that the PharmAthene Board of Directors may issue shares of preferred stock and in connection with such issuance fix such designations, preferences and relative, participating, option or other special rights as shall be stated and expressed in the resolution or resolutions adopted by the PharmAthene Board of Directors providing for such issuance and as may be permitted by the DGCL.

248


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

   
  Theraclone   PharmAthene
Rights of Dissenting Stockholders   The DGCL allows for appraisal rights only inconnection with certain mergers or consolidations. No such appraisal rights exist, however, for corporations whose shares are held of record by more than 2,000 stockholders or are listed on a national securities exchange, unless the Certificate of Incorporation provides that appraisal rights are available to the stockholders or the stockholders are to receive in the merger of consolidation anything other than (a) shares of stock of the corporation surviving or resulting from such merger or consolidation, (b) shares of stock of any other corporation which at the effective date of the merger or consolidation will be either listed on a national securities exchange or held of record by more than 2,000 stockholders, (c) cash in lieu of fractional shares of the corporation described in the foregoing clauses (a) and (b), or (d) any combination of (a), (b), or (c).   The DGCL allows for appraisal rights only in connection with certain mergers or consolidations. No such appraisal rights exist, however, for corporations whose shares are held of record by more than 2,000 stockholders or are listed on a national securities exchange, unless the Certificate of Incorporation provides that appraisal rights are available to the stockholders or the stockholders are to receive in the merger of consolidation anything other than (a) shares of stock of the corporation surviving or resulting from such merger or consolidation, (b) shares of stock of any other corporation which at the effective date of the merger or consolidation will be either listed on a national securities exchange or held of record by more than 2,000 stockholders, (c) cash in lieu of fractional shares of the corporation described in the foregoing clauses (a) and (b), or (d) any combination of (a), (b), or (c).

Certain Business Combinations/ Anti-Takeover Provisions   Under Delaware law, a privately held corporation is not subject to Section 203 of the DGCL, which generally protects publicly held Delaware corporations from unfair transactions and tactics by persons who acquire large blocks of stock without prior Board approval, unless its Certificate of Incorporation otherwise provides.   Under Delaware law, a corporation can elect not to be governed by Section 203 of the DGCL, which generally protects publicly held Delaware corporations from unfair transactions and tactics by persons who acquire large blocks of stock without prior board approval. PharmAthene has elected not to be governed by Section 203 of the DGCL.

249


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LEGAL MATTERS

The validity of the shares of PharmAthene common stock offered by this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation has been passed upon for PharmAthene by Dentons US LLP. The material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger have been passed upon for PharmAthene by Dentons US LLP and for Theraclone by Fenwick & West LLP.

EXPERTS

The consolidated financial statements of PharmAthene, Inc. as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012, included in the Proxy Statement of PharmAthene, Inc., which is referred to and made a part of this Prospectus and Registration Statement, have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in their report appearing elsewhere herein , and are included in reliance upon such report given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

The financial statements of Theraclone Sciences, Inc. as of and for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, included in the Proxy Statement of PharmAthene, Inc., which is referred to and made a part of this Prospectus and Registration Statement, have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, as stated in their report appearing elsewhere herein, and is included in reliance upon such report given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

PharmAthene has filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-4, of which this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation is a part, under the Securities Act, to register the issuance of PharmAthene common stock in the merger. However, this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation does not contain all of the information contained in the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules to the registration statement. PharmAthene and Theraclone encourage you to carefully read the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules to the registration statement.

As a public company, PharmAthene is required to file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. These filings are available to the public via the Internet at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. PharmAthene’s materials are also on file with the SEC and may be obtained for reading and/or copying at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the Public Reference Room.

You should rely only on the information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation to vote your shares at the special meeting or by written consent. Neither PharmAthene nor Theraclone has authorized anyone to provide you with information that differs from that contained in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation. This proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation is dated            , 2013. You should not assume that the information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation is accurate as of any date other than that date, and neither the mailing of this proxy statement/prospectus/consent to stockholders nor the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock in the merger will create any implication to the contrary.

OTHER MATTERS

Stockholder Proposals for 2014 Annual Meeting

In order for a stockholder proposal to be considered for inclusion in PharmAthene’s proxy statement for the 2014 annual meeting pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the SEC, the proposal must be received at PharmAthene’s offices no later than the close of business on December 31, 2013. If PharmAthene changes the date of its 2014 annual meeting by more than 30 days from the date of the 2013 annual meeting, then the deadline is a reasonable time before PharmAthene begins to print and send its proxy materials. Upon any determination that the date of the 2014 annual meeting will be advanced or delayed by more than 30 days from the date of the 2013 annual meeting, PharmAthene will disclose the change in the earliest practicable Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

For any proposal that is not submitted for inclusion in next year’s proxy statement by the deadline identified above, SEC rules permit management to vote proxies in its discretion if PharmAthene: (i) receives

250


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

notice of the proposal more than 45 days prior to the first anniversary of the date PharmAthene first sent its proxy materials for the 2013 annual meeting of stockholders, which would be March 16, 2014, and PharmAthene advises stockholders in next year’s annual meeting proxy statement about the nature of the matter and how management intends to vote on such matter (subject to the right of the proposing stockholder to deliver a proxy statement and proxy of its own in compliance with the terms of Rule 14a-4(c)(2) under the Exchange Act), or (ii) does not receive notice of the proposal at least 45 days prior to the first anniversary of the date PharmAthene first sent its proxy materials for the 2013 annual meeting of stockholders, which would be March 16, 2014. If PharmAthene changes the date of its 2014 annual meeting by more than 30 days from the date of the 2013 annual meeting, then the deadline is a reasonable time before it begins to print and send its proxy materials.

Any stockholder who wishes to submit a stockholder proposal should send it to PharmAthene, Inc., One Park Place, Annapolis, MD 21401, c/o Corporate Secretary.

HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS

Beneficial owners of common stock who share a single address may receive only one copy of the Notice or the proxy materials, as the case may be, unless their broker, bank or nominee has received contrary instructions from any beneficial owner at that address. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce printing and mailing costs. If any beneficial owner(s) at such an address wish to discontinue householding and receive a separate copy of the Notice or the proxy materials, as the case may be, or if beneficial owners sharing an address who are currently receiving separate copies wish to receive only one copy, they may contact Broadridge, either by calling (800) 579-1639, or by writing to Broadridge, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York, 11717.

251


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm — Consolidated Financial
Statements
    F-2  
Consolidated Balance Sheets     F-3  
Consolidated Statements of Operations     F-4  
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss     F-5  
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity     F-6  
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows     F-7  
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements     F-8  
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets     F-26  
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations     F-27  
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss     F-28  
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows     F-29  
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements     F-30  

F-1


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Board of Directors and Stockholders of
PharmAthene, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of PharmAthene, Inc. as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of PharmAthene, Inc. at December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), PharmAthene, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 13, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Baltimore, Maryland
March 13, 2013

F-2


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

   
  December 31,
     2012   2011
ASSETS
                 
Current assets:
                 
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 12,701,517     $ 11,236,771  
Accounts receivable (billed)     2,432,641       4,424,442  
Unbilled accounts receivable     4,114,442       3,021,208  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets     547,245       830,585  
Restricted cash           100,000  
Total current assets     19,795,845       19,613,006  
Property and equipment, net     483,976       788,666  
Other long-term assets and deferred costs     113,130       53,384  
Goodwill     2,348,453       2,348,453  
Total assets   $ 22,741,404     $ 22,803,509  
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
                 
Current liabilities:
                 
Accounts payable   $ 1,697,280     $ 1,445,700  
Accrued expenses and other liabilities     2,328,877       2,655,330  
Deferred revenue     1,381,755       514,312  
Current portion of long-term debt     749,997        
Short-term debt     1,330,507        
Total current liabilities     7,488,416       4,615,342  
Other long-term liabilities     579,427       449,709  
Long-term debt, less current portion     1,704,108        
Derivative instruments     1,295,613       1,886,652  
Total liabilities     11,067,564       6,951,703  
Stockholders' equity:
                 
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 48,352,651 and 48,236,172 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively     4,835       4,824  
Additional paid-in-capital     210,495,905       208,525,917  
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income     (217,328 )      1,010,522  
Accumulated deficit     (198,609,572 )      (193,689,457 ) 
Total stockholders' equity     11,673,840       15,851,806  
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity   $ 22,741,404     $ 22,803,509  

 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F-3


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

     
  Year Ended December 31,
     2012   2011   2010
Revenue   $ 25,175,887     $ 24,266,274     $ 20,993,605  
Operating expenses:
                          
Research and development     19,509,629       21,219,853       20,875,536  
General and administrative     11,628,732       14,311,079       18,015,761  
Depreciation and amortization (including $4,635,489 of impairment charges in 2010)     303,916       461,073       5,655,865  
Total operating expenses     31,442,277       35,992,005       44,547,162  
Loss from operations   $ (6,266,390 )    $ (11,725,731 )    $ (23,553,557 ) 
Other income (expense):
                          
Interest income     17,808       16,660       6,955  
Interest expense     (342,561 )      (54,573 )      (5,936,480 ) 
Gain on the sale of assets held for sale           781,760        
Realization of cumulative translation adjustment     1,227,656              
Change in fair value of derivative instruments     591,039       7,144,983       (5,457,550 ) 
Other income, net     47,862       39,328       91,355  
Total other income (expense)     1,541,804       7,928,158       (11,295,720 ) 
Net loss before income taxes     (4,724,586 )      (3,797,573 )      (34,849,277 ) 
Provision for income taxes     (195,529 )             
Net loss   $ (4,920,115 )    $ (3,797,573 )    $ (34,849,277 ) 
Basic and diluted net loss per share   $ (0.10 )    $ (0.08 )    $ (1.08 ) 
Weighted average shares used in calculation of basic and diluted net loss per share     48,323,067       47,331,763       32,309,621  

 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F-4


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

     
  Year ended December 31,
     2012   2011   2010
Net loss   $ (4,920,115 )    $ (3,797,573 )    $ (34,849,277 ) 
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
                          
Realization of cumulative translation adjustment included in
net loss
    (1,227,656 )             
Foreign currency translation adjustments     (194 )      (239,975 )      68,824  
Net unrealized losses on investments                 (6,483 ) 
Comprehensive loss   $ (6,147,965 )    $ (4,037,548 )    $ (34,786,936 ) 

 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F-5


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

           
  Common Stock   Amount   Additional Paid-In Capital   Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)   Accumulated Deficit   Stockholders' Equity
     Shares
Balance as of 12/31/2009     28,130,284     $ 2,813     $ 157,004,037     $ 1,188,156     $ (155,042,607 )    $ 3,152,399  
Net loss                             (34,849,277 )      (34,849,277 ) 
Net unrealized (losses) on
short-term investments
                      (6,483 )            (6,483 ) 
Foreign currency translation adjustments                       68,824             68,824  
Issuance of common stock, net issuance costs     9,397,382       940       19,471,084                   19,472,024  
Exercise of stock purchase warrants     14,537       1       2,698                   2,699  
Share-based compensation –  stock options                 2,292,479                   2,292,479  
Shares issued upon exercise of stock options     22,316       2       56,206                   56,208  
Employee vesting of restricted shares, net     84,742       9       191,486                   191,495  
Conversion of July 2009 Convertible Debt     8,588,983       859       21,829,478                   21,830,337  
Balance as of 12/31/2010     46,238,244     $ 4,624     $ 200,847,468     $ 1,250,497     $ (189,891,884 )    $ 12,210,705  
Net loss                             (3,797,573 )      (3,797,573 ) 
Foreign currency translation adjustments                       (239,975 )            (239,975 ) 
Issuance of common stock, net issuance costs     1,857,143       186       5,068,542                   5,068,728  
Share-based compensation –  stock options                 2,251,501                   2,251,501  
Shares issued upon exercise of stock options     44,464       4       118,305                   118,309  
Employee vesting of restricted shares, net     96,321       10       240,101                   240,111  
Balance as of 12/31/2011     48,236,172     $ 4,824     $ 208,525,917     $ 1,010,522     $ (193,689,457 )    $ 15,851,806  
Net loss                             (4,920,115 )      (4,920,115 ) 
Reclassification of the cumulative translation adjustment on substantial liquidation of PharmAthene Canada                       (1,227,656 )            (1,227,656 ) 
Foreign currency translation adjustments                       (194 )            (194 ) 
Share-based compensation –  stock options                 1,803,427                   1,803,427  
Shares issued upon exercise of stock options     31,474       3       38,981                   38,984  
Employee vesting of restricted shares, net     85,005       8       57,704                   57,712  
Warrants to purchase common stock issued in connection with issuance of long-term debt                 69,876                   69,876  
Balance as of 12/31/2012     48,352,651     $ 4,835     $ 210,495,905     $ (217,328 )    $ (198,609,572 )    $ 11,673,840  

 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F-6


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

     
  Year ended December 31,
     2012   2011   2010
Operating activities
                          
Net loss   $ (4,920,115 )    $ (3,797,573 )    $ (34,849,277 ) 
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
                          
Realization of cumulative translation adjustment     (1,227,656 )             
Bad debt (recovery) expense           (40,524 )      2,935,063  
Change in fair value of derivative instruments     (591,039 )      (7,144,983 )      5,457,550  
Depreciation and amortization expense     303,916       461,073       1,020,376  
Impairment of assets held for sale                 4,635,489  
Gain on the disposal of assets held for sale           (781,760 )       
Gain of the disposal of property and equipment     (66,626 )             
Share-based compensation expense     1,894,099       2,565,961       2,513,159  
Deferred income taxes     195,529              
Non-cash interest expense     122,342             4,653,633  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
                          
Accounts receivable     1,991,801       20,748       1,279,875  
Unbilled accounts receivable     (1,093,234 )      987,408       5,408,216  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets     367,149       1,481,150       (650,722 ) 
Accounts payable     251,561       (1,682,461 )      1,245,975  
Accrued expenses and other liabilities     (418,076 )      (391,904 )      (8,513,914 ) 
Deferred revenue     867,443       514,312        
Net cash used in operating activities     (2,322,906 )      (7,808,553 )      (14,864,577 ) 
Investing activities
                          
Purchases of property and equipment           (71,439 )      (374,581 ) 
Proceeds from the disposal of assets held for sale           1,758,960        
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment     67,400              
Proceeds from sales of short-term investments                 3,130,588  
Net cash provided by investing activities     67,400       1,687,521       2,756,007  
Financing activities
                          
Proceeds from issuance (repayment) of debt     2,500,000             (11,439 ) 
Proceeds from revolving credit agreement     1,330,507              
Deferred financing costs     (216,460 )             
Change in restricted cash requirements     100,000             (100,000 ) 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants     38,984       5,855,689       21,601,075  
Other     (32,960 )      (74,361 )      (29,184 ) 
Net cash provided by financing activities     3,720,071       5,781,328       21,460,452  
Effects of exchange rates on cash     181       (208,852 )      (240,122 ) 
Increases (decreases) in cash and cash equivalents     1,464,746       (548,556 )      9,111,760  
Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period     11,236,771       11,785,327       2,673,567  
Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period   $ 12,701,517     $ 11,236,771     $ 11,785,327  
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
                          
Cash paid for interest   $ 220,219     $ 54,573     $ 1,234,142  
Cash paid for income taxes   $     $ 10,630     $  
Financing activity
                          
Value of warrants issued to lender in connection with loan   $ 69,876     $     $  
Value of warrants issued in connection with the issuance of common stock   $     $ 668,640     $ 2,070,146  

 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F-7


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012

Note 1 — Organization and Business

We were formed in April 2005 as Healthcare Acquisition Corp. (“HAQ”), a special purpose acquisition company, formed solely to acquire a then unidentified business. On August 3, 2005, we consummated our initial public offering. On August 3, 2007, we acquired all the outstanding equity of PharmAthene, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and changed our name from Healthcare Acquisition Corp. to PharmAthene, Inc. In March 2008, PharmAthene Inc., through its wholly owned subsidiary PharmAthene UK Limited, acquired substantially all the assets and liabilities related to the biodefense vaccines business of Avecia Biologics Limited.

We are incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware and are a biopharmaceutical company focused on developing biodefense countermeasure applications. We are subject to those risks associated with any biopharmaceutical company that has substantial expenditures for research and development. There can be no assurance that our research and development projects will be successful, that products developed will obtain necessary regulatory approval, or that any approved product will be commercially viable. In addition, we operate in an environment of rapid technological change and are largely dependent on the services and expertise of our employees, consultants and other third parties.

Historically, we have performed under government contracts and grants and raised funds from investors (including additional debt and equity issued in 2012, 2011 and 2010) to sustain our operations. The Company has spent and will continue to spend substantial funds in the research, development, clinical and preclinical testing of the Company's product candidates with the goal of ultimately obtaining approval from the FDA, to market and sell our products. We may elect to raise additional capital through debt and or equity to strengthen our financial position.

Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PharmAthene, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. We currently operate in one business segment. Certain receivables, primarily related to tax credits or grants, of approximately $0.5 million and $0.6 million as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 respectively, previously classified in our consolidated balance sheets as “accounts receivable,” have been reclassified as “prepaid expenses and other current assets” to conform with current period presentation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Our consolidated financial statements include significant estimates for the expected economic life and value of our intangible assets, and the amount of our net operating losses, our share-based compensation, our financial instruments, among other things. Because of the use of estimates inherent in the financial reporting process, actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currency of our wholly owned foreign subsidiaries is their local currency. Assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries are translated into United States dollars based on exchange rates at the end of the reporting period. Income and expense items are translated at the weighted average exchange rates prevailing during the reporting period. Translation adjustments for subsidiaries that have not been sold, substantially liquidated or otherwise disposed of, are accumulated in other comprehensive income (loss), a

F-8


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012

Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

component of stockholders’ equity. Foreign currency translation adjustments are the sole component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at December 31, 2012 and 2011. Transaction gains or (losses) are included in the determination of net income or loss, and were approximately ($0.01) million, ($0.1) million and $0.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

In July 2012, we substantially liquidated our Canadian subsidiary, which we acquired in 2005. As a result, we realized approximately $1.2 million of income in our consolidated statement of operations, which represents the amount of previously recorded foreign currency translation adjustments related to our Canadian subsidiary.

Comprehensive Loss and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive loss includes the total of our net loss and all other changes in equity other than transactions with owners, including (i) changes in equity for cumulative translation adjustments resulting from the consolidation of foreign subsidiaries as the financial statements of the subsidiaries located outside of the United States are accounted for using the local currency as the functional currency, and (ii) unrealized gains and losses on short term available-for-sale investments.

Effective January 1, 2012, the Company adopted ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income (ASU 2011-05). As a result, the Company now presents comprehensive income (loss) in its consolidated financial statements as a single financial statement. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 did not affect the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position, or liquidity.

Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

Cash and cash equivalents are stated at market value. We consider all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Interest income earned on cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments was approximately $0.02 million, $0.02 million and $0.01 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010 we had $0.1 million in restricted cash associated with a letter of credit to support our corporate credit card program. As of December 31, 2012, none of our cash was restricted.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk are primarily cash, restricted cash and cash equivalents, and billed and unbilled accounts receivable. We maintain our cash, restricted cash and cash equivalents in the form of money market accounts and overnight deposits with financial institutions that we believe are credit worthy. Because our billed and unbilled accounts receivable consist of amounts due from the U.S. federal government, management deems there to be minimal credit risk.

Revolving Line of Credit and Term Loan

As discussed further in Note 6, we entered into a loan agreement with General Electric Capital Corporation (“GE Capital”) in March 2012. As part of that agreement, we issued stock purchase warrants to GE Capital that expire in March 2022. The fair value of the warrants was charged to additional paid-in-capital, resulting in a debt discount at the date of issuance. The debt discount is being amortized over the term of the loan agreement using the effective interest method. Financing costs incurred in connection with this agreement are being amortized over the term of the agreement using the effective interest method. The amortization of both the debt discount and deferred financing costs are included in interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations.

F-9


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012

Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

Significant Customers and Accounts Receivable

Our primary customers are the U.S. Department of Defense (the “DoD”), Chemical Biological Medical Systems (“CBMS”), the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (“NIAID”), the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (“BARDA”), and the National Institute of Health (“NIH”).

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company’s trade receivable balances were comprised solely of receivables from these customers. Unbilled accounts receivable totaling $4.1 million and $3.0 million as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, relate to the contracts with these same customers.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consist of leasehold improvements, furniture and office equipment and computer and other equipment and are recorded at cost. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the economic life of the asset or the lease term, whichever is shorter. Property and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets as follows:

 
Asset Category   Estimated Useful Life
(in Years)
Leasehold improvements   8 – 10
Furniture and office equipment   5
Computer and other equipment   3 – 5

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets consist primarily of property and equipment. We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. Recoverability measurement and estimating of undiscounted cash flows is done at the lowest possible level for which we can identify assets. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.

In the fourth quarter of 2010, we realized an impairment of certain assets associated with the closing of our Canadian operations upon the expiration of the Protexia® contract with the DoD. As a result we recognized an impairment charge of approximately $4.6 million which is included in depreciation and amortization expense in the accompanying 2010 consolidated statement of operations. The remaining assets consisting of land and buildings of approximately $1.0 million were reclassified as assets held for sale as of December 31, 2010, and subsequently sold in 2011.

Exit Activities

In the fourth quarter 2011, we recognized a gain on the sale of assets of PharmAthene Canada of approximately $0.8 million, which is included in 2011 in the consolidated statement of operations. We substantially completed the liquidation of our Canadian subsidiary in July 2012 and at that time realized approximately $1.2 million of accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments, which is included in 2012, in the consolidated statement of operations and the consolidated statement of comprehensive loss.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of our short term financial instruments, which primarily include cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable (billed and unbilled), other current assets, accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities, and short term debt, approximate their fair values due to their short maturities. The fair value of our long-term indebtedness is estimated based on the current rates offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities. See Note 3 for further details.

F-10


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012

Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the fair value of net identifiable assets associated with acquisitions. We review the recoverability of goodwill by comparing our market value (as measured by our stock price multiplied by the number of outstanding shares as of the end of the year) to the net book value of our equity. If our market value exceeds our net book value, no further analysis is required. Changes in our business strategy or adverse changes in market conditions could impact the impairment analyses and require the recognition of an impairment charge equal to the excess of the carrying value over its estimated fair value. We completed our annual impairment assessment of goodwill on December 31, 2012 and determined that there was no impairment as of that date.

In 2010 we recognized an impairment charge of $0.8 million associated with our patents related to Protexia® as a result of our decision to shut down the Canadian operation upon the expiration of the Protexia® contract with the DoD. The impairment charge is included within depreciation and amortization in 2010, in our consolidated statement of operations.

Revenue Recognition

We generate our revenue from different types of contractual arrangements: cost-plus-fee contracts, cost reimbursable grants and fixed price contracts.

Revenues on cost-plus-fee contracts are recognized in an amount equal to the costs incurred during the period plus an estimate of the applicable fee earned. The estimate of the applicable fee earned is determined by reference to the contract: if the contract defines the fee in terms of risk-based milestones and specifies the fees to be earned upon the completion of each milestone, then the fee is recognized when the related milestones are earned, as further described below; otherwise, we estimate the fee earned in a given period by using a proportional performance method based on costs incurred during the period as compared to total estimated project costs and application of the resulting fraction to the total project fee specified in the contract.

Under the milestone method of revenue recognition, milestone payments (including milestone payments for fees) contained in research and development arrangements are recognized as revenue when: (i) the milestones are achieved; (ii) no further performance obligations with respect to the milestone exist; (iii) collection is reasonably assured; and (iv) substantive effort was necessary to achieve the milestone.

Milestones are considered substantive if all of the following conditions are met:

it is commensurate with either our performance to meet the milestone or the enhancement of the value of the delivered item or items as a result of a specific outcome resulting from our performance to achieve the milestone,
it relates solely to past performance,
the value of the milestone is reasonable relative to all the deliverables and payment terms (including other potential milestone consideration) within the arrangement.

If a milestone is deemed not to be substantive, the Company recognizes the portion of the milestone payment as revenue that correlates to work already performed; the remaining portion of the milestone payment is deferred and recognized as revenue as the Company completes its performance obligations.

Revenue on fixed price contracts (without substantive milestones as described above) is recognized on the percentage-of-completion method. The percentage-of-completion method recognizes income as the contract progresses (generally related to the costs incurred in providing the services required under the contract). The use of the percentage-of-completion method depends on the ability to make reasonable dependable estimates

F-11


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012

Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

and the fact that circumstances may necessitate frequent revision of estimates does not indicate that the estimates are unreliable for the purpose for which they are used.

As a result of our revenue recognition policies and the billing provisions contained in our contracts, the timing of customer billings may differ from the timing of recognizing revenue. Amounts invoiced to customers in excess of revenue recognized are reflected on the balance sheet as deferred revenue. We recorded approximately $1.4 million and $0.5 million as deferred revenue as of December 31, 2012 and 2011. Amounts recognized as revenue in excess of amounts billed to customers are reflected on the balance sheet as unbilled accounts receivable.

We analyze each cost reimbursable grant to determine whether we should report such reimbursements as revenue or as an offset to our expenses incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, we recorded approximately $1.1 million, $0.7 million and $2.9 million, respectively, of costs reimbursed by the government as a reduction of research and development expenses. Included in the 2010 grants was approximately $0.9 million in therapeutic discovery tax grants, which was offset against research and development expense in 2010.

Collaborative Arrangements

Even though most of our products are being developed in conjunction with support by the U.S. Government, we are an active participant in that development, with exposure to significant risks and rewards of commercialization relating to the development of these pipeline products. In collaborations where we are deemed to be the principal participant of the collaboration, we recognize costs and revenues generated from third parties using the gross basis of accounting; otherwise, we use the net basis of accounting.

Research and Development

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred; advance payments are deferred and expensed as performance occurs. Research and development costs include salaries, facilities expense, overhead expenses, material and supplies, preclinical expense, clinical trials and related clinical manufacturing expenses, share-based compensation expense, contract services and other outside services.

Share-Based Compensation

We expense the estimated fair value of share-based awards granted to employees under our stock compensation plans. The fair value of stock options is determined at the grant date using an option pricing model. We have estimated the fair value of each stock option award using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes model considers, among other factors, the expected life of the award and the expected volatility of our stock price. The value of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense on a straight line basis over the employee’s requisite service period.

The fair value of restricted stock grants is determined based on the closing price of our common stock on the award date and is recognized as expense ratably over the requisite service period.

Employee share-based compensation expense in 2012, 2011 and 2010 is calculated based on awards ultimately expected to vest and is reduced for estimated forfeitures at a rate of 12%.

Share-based compensation expense for 2012, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:

     
  Year ended December 31,
     2012   2011   2010
Research and development   $ 518,375     $ 754,554     $ 1,008,368  
General and administrative     1,375,724       1,811,407       1,504,791  
Total share-based compensation expense   $ 1,894,099     $ 2,565,961     $ 2,513,159  

F-12


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012

Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

During 2012, we granted 852,139 options to employees and non-employee directors and made no restricted stock grants. At December 31, 2012, we had total unrecognized share-based compensation expense related to unvested awards of options and restricted shares of approximately $2.3 million, net of estimated forfeitures, which we expect to recognize as expense over a weighted-average period of 2.36 years.

During the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, we received $38,984, $118,309 and $56,208 from stock options exercised, respectively.

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes using the asset and liability approach, which requires the recognition of future tax benefits or liabilities on the temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of our assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized. We also recognize a tax benefit from uncertain tax positions only if it is “more likely than not” that the position is sustainable based on its technical merits. Our policy is to recognize interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we had recognized a full valuation allowance since the likelihood of realization of our tax deferred assets does not meet the more likely than not threshold.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, we incurred income tax expense of approximately $0.2 million relating exclusively to the generation of a deferred tax liability associated with the amortization of goodwill, which is included as a component of other long-term liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. There was no income tax expense for the periods ended December 31, 2011 or 2010.

We file a U.S. federal income tax return as well as returns for various state and foreign jurisdictions. Our income taxes have not been examined by any tax jurisdiction since our inception. Uncertain tax positions taken on our tax returns are accounted for as liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits. We recognize interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations.

Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share

Income (loss) per share:  Basic income (loss) per share is computed by dividing consolidated net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, excluding unvested restricted stock.

For periods of net income when the effects are not anti-dilutive, diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing our net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding and the impact of all potential dilutive common shares, consisting primarily of stock options, unvested restricted stock and stock purchase warrants. The dilutive impact of our dilutive potential common shares resulting from stock options and stock purchase warrants is determined by applying the treasury stock method.

For the periods of net loss, diluted loss per share is calculated similarly to basic loss per share because the impact of all dilutive potential common shares is anti-dilutive due to the net losses. Approximately 11.9 million, 12.0 million and 10.7 million potential dilutive shares have been excluded in the calculation of diluted net loss per share in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Effective January 1, 2012, the Company adopted ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income (ASU 2011-05). As a result, the Company now presents comprehensive income (loss) in its consolidated financial statements as a single financial statement. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 did not affect the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position, or liquidity.

F-13


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012

Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

Effective January 1, 2012, the Company adopted ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) (“ASU 2011-04”), which contains amendments to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosures in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. ASU 2011-04 explains how to measure fair value for financial reporting. The guidance does not require fair value measurements in addition to those already required or permitted by other Topics. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 did not have any effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

Effective January 1, 2012, the Company adopted ASU 2011-08, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) (ASU 2011-08). Previous guidance required an entity to test goodwill for impairment, on at least an annual basis, by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then a second step of the test must be performed to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. Under the amendments in ASU 2011-08, an entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The adoption of ASU 2011-08 did not have a material effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

In, February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The objective of this update is to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The amendments in this Update seek to attain that objective by requiring an entity to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in net income if the amount being reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in its entirety to net income. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, an entity is required to cross-reference other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is reclassified to a balance sheet account (for example, inventory) instead of directly to income or expense in the same reporting period. ASU 2013-02 is effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted. The adoptions of ASU 2013-02 will not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operation, financial position or cash flows.

Note 3 — Fair Value Measurements

We define fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We report assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value using a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

F-14


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012

Note 3 — Fair Value Measurements  – (continued)

An asset’s or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. At each reporting period, we perform a detailed analysis of our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value. All assets and liabilities for which the fair value measurement is based on significant unobservable inputs or instruments which trade infrequently and therefore have little or no price transparency are classified as Level 3.

We have segregated our financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value into the most appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to determine the fair value at the measurement date in the table below. We have no non-financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value at December 31, 2012 and 2011.

       
  As of December 31, 2012
     Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Balance
Liabilities
                                   
Derivatives instruments   $     $     $ 1,295,613     $ 1,295,613  

       
  As of December 31, 2011
     Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Balance
Liabilities
                                   
Derivatives instruments   $     $     $ 1,886,652     $ 1,886,652  

The following table sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of our Level 3 liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010:

       
Description   Balance as of December 31, 2011   New Liabilities   Unrealized (Gains)   Balance as of December 31, 2012
Stock purchase warrants   $ 1,886,652           $ (591,039 )    $ 1,295,613  

       
Description   Balance as of December 31, 2010   New Liabilities 2011   Unrealized (Gains)   Balance as of December 31, 2011
Stock purchase warrants   $ 8,362,995     $ 668,640     $ (7,144,983 )    $ 1,886,652  

       
Description   Balance as of December 31, 2009   New Liabilities 2010   Unrealized Losses   Balance as of December 31, 2010
Stock purchase warrants   $ 835,299     $ 2,070,146     $ 5,457,550     $ 8,362,995  

At December 31, 2012 and 2011 derivative liabilities are comprised of 2,899,991 warrants to purchase common stock. The warrants are considered to be derivative liabilities due to the presence of net settlement features and, as a result, are recorded at fair value at each balance sheet date. The fair value of our warrants is determined based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Use of the Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires the use of unobservable inputs such as the expected term, anticipated volatility and expected dividends. Changes in any of the assumptions related to the unobservable inputs identified above may change the stock purchase warrants’ fair value; increases in expected term, anticipated volatility and expected dividends generally result in increases in fair value, while decreases in the unobservable inputs generally result in decreases in fair value. Gains and losses on the fair value adjustments for these derivative instruments are classified in other income (expense) as the change in fair value of derivative instruments in our consolidated statements of operations. The $0.6 million unrealized gains on the change in the market value of derivative instruments during the year ended December 31, 2012 is due primarily to the change in the closing price of our stock, which was $1.27 per share as of December 30, 2011 and $1.12 per share as of December 31, 2012. The $7.1 million unrealized gains on the change in the market value of derivative

F-15


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012

Note 3 — Fair Value Measurements  – (continued)

instruments during the year ended December 31, 2011 is due primarily to the change in the closing price of our stock, which was $4.23 per share as of December 31, 2010 and $1.27 per share as of December 31, 2011. The $5.5 million unrealized loss on the change in the market value of derivative instruments during the year ended December 31, 2010 is due primarily to the unrecognized losses on the new derivative liabilities issued during 2010 and the change in the closing price of our stock from their date of issuance to $4.23 per share as of December 31, 2010.

   
Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value at 12/31/2012   Valuation Technique   Unobservable Inputs
$1,295,613
    Black-Scholes option pricing model       Expected term  
                Expected dividends  
                Anticipated volatility  

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011 the Company had no assets or liabilities that were measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.

The fair value of long-term debt approximates its face value at December 31, 2012, which was $2.5 million.

Note 4 — Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consisted of the following:

   
  December 31,
     2012   2011
Leasehold improvements   $ 758,126     $ 758,126  
Furniture and office equipment     234,018       234,018  
Computer and other equipment     1,397,012       1,409,580  
       2,389,156       2,401,724  
Less accumulated depreciation     (1,905,180 )      (1,613,058 ) 
Property and equipment, net   $ 483,976     $ 788,666  

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $0.3 million, $0.5 million, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $5.7 million. The Company recorded an impairment charge in 2010 of approximately $3.8 million associated with the closing of the Canadian operation upon the expiration of the Protexia® contract and of certain patents of approximately $0.8 million. These charges are included in depreciation and amortization in the accompanying 2010 consolidated statement of operations.

Note 5 — Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities

Accrued expenses and other liabilities consisted of the following:

   
  December 31,
     2012   2011
Accrued development expenses   $ 1,716,557     $ 1,479,105  
Accrued professional services     365,680       423,756  
Accrued employee payroll and related expenses     189,746       752,469  
Other     56,894        
Accrued expenses and other liabilities   $ 2,328,877     $ 2,655,330  

F-16


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012

Note 6 — Debt

Term Loan and Revolving Line of Credit

On March 30, 2012, we entered into a Loan Agreement with GE Capital. The Loan Agreement provides for a senior secured debt facility including a $2.5 million term loan and a revolving line of credit of up to $5 million based on our outstanding qualified accounts receivable. On March 30, 2012, the term loan was funded for an aggregate amount of $2.5 million.

Under the terms of the revolving line of credit, the Company may draw down from the revolving line of credit up to 85% of qualified billed accounts receivable and 80% of qualified unbilled accounts receivable. As of December 31, 2012, the total amount available to draw was approximately $2.9 million, of which $1.3 million was drawn and outstanding.

The fixed interest rate on the term loan is 10.14% per annum. The revolving line of credit has an adjustable interest rate based upon the 3-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), with a floor of 1.5%, plus 5%. As of December 31, 2012, the interest rate was 6.5%. Both the term loan and the revolving line of credit mature in September 2015. Payments on the term loan were originally interest-only for the first 10 months, which has since been extended to 12 months pursuant to terms of the agreement. Subsequently, the term loan will fully amortize over its remaining term as of December 31, 2012. Principal payments on the term loan are scheduled as follows:

 
Year   Principal Payments
2013   $ 749,997  
2014     999,996  
2015     750,007  
     $ 2,500,000  

The term loan is recorded on the 2012 consolidated balance sheet, net of debt discount, as follows:

 
Current portion of long-term debt   $ 749,997  
Long-term debt, less current portion   $ 1,704,108  

If we prepay the term loan and terminate the revolving line of credit prior to the scheduled maturity date, we are obligated to pay a prepayment premium equal to 3% of the then outstanding principal amount of the term loan if prepaid during the first two years of the loan and 2% if prepaid during the third year or thereafter. In addition, we are obligated to pay a final payment fee of 3% of the term loan balance. The final payment fee is being accrued and expensed over the term of the agreement, using the effective interest method and is included in other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.

Our obligations under the Loan Agreement are collateralized by a security interest in substantially all of our assets. While the security interest does not, except in limited circumstances, cover our intellectual property, it does cover any proceeds received by us from the use or sale of our intellectual property.

The Loan Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants, including limitations on acquisitions, dispositions, incurrence of indebtedness and the granting of security interests. The representations, warranties and covenants contained in the Loan Agreement were made only for purposes of such agreement and as of a specific date or specific dates, were solely for the benefit of the parties to such agreement, and may be subject to limitations agreed upon by the contracting parties, including being qualified by confidential disclosures exchanged between the parties in connection with the execution of the Loan Agreement.

The Loan Agreement contains certain financial and non-financial covenants. Upon the occurrence and during the continuance of any event of default, GE Capital may, and at the written request of the requisite

F-17


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012

Note 6 — Debt  – (continued)

lenders shall, terminate the commitments under the facilities and declare any or all of the obligations to be immediately due and payable, without demand or notice to us; however, any event of default relating to timely payment of debts, insolvency, liquidation, bankruptcy or similar events will result in automatic acceleration. Among the remedies available to GE Capital in case of an event of default are the taking possession and disposition of any collateral under the Loan Agreement.

In connection with the Loan Agreement, we issued GE Capital warrants to purchase 46,584 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.61 per share, The warrants are exercisable immediately and subject to customary and standard anti-dilution adjustments. The warrants are classified in equity and, as a result, the fair value of the warrants was charged to additional paid-in capital resulting in a debt discount at the date of issuance. The debt discount is being amortized over the term of the loan agreement using the effective interest method. Financing costs incurred in connection with this agreement are also being amortized over the term of the agreement using the effective interest method.

The fair value of the long-term term loan approximates its face value at December 31, 2012, which was approximately $2.5 million.

Convertible Notes

In July 2009, we issued approximately $19.3 million of convertible notes (“Convertible Notes”) and stock purchase warrants to investors in a private placement.

In November 2010, holders of Convertible Notes in the aggregate principal amount (plus accrued interest) of approximately $17.0 million converted their notes into approximately 6.7 million shares of common stock (at the stated conversion price of $2.54 per share) pursuant to an early conversion offer we made to all holders. During the fourth quarter of 2010, we expensed approximately $1.1 million related to the early conversion offer. After we issued a redemption (call) notice in November 2010, holders of additional Convertible Notes in the aggregate principal amount (plus accrued interest) of approximately $4.8 million converted their notes into approximately 1.9 million shares. Convertible Notes with principal plus accrued interest of approximately $11,000 were not converted, and as a result of the redemption notice, we paid the holder in cash to satisfy our obligations under such note on the redemption date.

We incurred approximately $5.8 million of interest expense related to the Convertible Notes in 2010.

Note 7 — Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

We lease our offices in Maryland under a 10 year operating lease, which commenced on May 1, 2007. We also lease offices in North Carolina with the lease term expiring in September 2013. Remaining annual minimum payments for these two leases are as follows:

 
Year   Lease Payments
2013   $ 809,400  
2014   $ 797,700  
2015   $ 821,600  
2016   $ 846,200  
2017   $ 356,900  

For each of the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 total rent expense under operating lease agreements approximated $0.8 million, $0.8 million and $1.0 million, respectively.

F-18


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012

Note 7 — Commitments and Contingencies  – (continued)

License Agreements

In connection with an acquisition in 2008, we acquired license agreements with The Defence Science and Technology Laboratory of the United Kingdom Ministry of Defence (“DSTL”) for the rights to certain technologies. These agreements allow for the licensing of certain patents and technology necessary to perform development of the rPA vaccine program as required under the Company’s government contracts. Upon commercialization, the license agreements require that PharmAthene make royalty payments equal to a specified percentage of future sales of products for both government procurement and commercial markets. No royalty payments on these licenses have been incurred.

In 2012 we entered into a commercial licensing agreement allowing for the licensing of certain patent and other intellectual property rights from a research company related to BChE. The agreement includes certain annual maintenance and other development milestone payments. Upon commercialization, the license agreement requires royalty payments equal to a specified percentage of future sales of products for both government procurement and commercial market sales subject to the license through the expiration of the licensed patents. No maintenance or milestone payments were incurred in 2012.

SIGA Litigation

In December 2006, we filed a complaint against SIGA Technologies, Inc. (“SIGA”) in the Delaware Court of Chancery. The complaint alleged, among other things, that we have the right to license exclusively development and marketing rights for SIGA’s drug candidate, ArestvyrTM (Tecovirimat), pursuant to a Merger Agreement between the parties that was terminated in 2006. The complaint also alleged that SIGA failed to negotiate in good faith the terms of such a license pursuant to the terminated Merger Agreement.

In September 2011, the Court issued an opinion in the case finding that SIGA had breached certain contractual obligations to us and upholding our claims of promissory estoppel. The Court awarded us the right to receive 50% of all net profits (as defined in the court’s final judgment) related to the sale of ArestvyrTM and related products for 10 years following initial commercial sale of the drug once SIGA earns $40 million in net profits from the sale of ArestvyrTM and related products. The Court also awarded us one-third of our reasonable attorney's fees and expert witness fees, which amounts to approximately $2.4 million plus interest. In May 2012, the Court issued its final judgment. SIGA has appealed aspects of the decision to the Delaware Supreme Court. In response, we cross-appealed other aspects of the decision. In January 2013, the Delaware Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case.

We can provide no assurances that SIGA will not prevail on its appeal, that we will be successful in our appeal, and that the Delaware Supreme Court will not overturn the trial court’s decision awarding us a 10 year 50% net profit of the sales of ArestvyrTM and related products (once SIGA retains the first $40 million in net profit). We have not yet recorded any amount due from SIGA in relation to this case.

Vendor litigation

One of our vendors mishandled the storage of certain biological materials. While we have recently been engaged in discussions with the vendor to address our concerns, so far we have not come to agreement. The vendor recently filed suit against us in Delaware state court seeking a declaration that they are not liable for damages and seeking damages from us for allegedly not maintaining the required amount and type of insurance. We filed suit against the vendor in Maryland state court seeking damages related to the loss of the property. We believe we did maintain the appropriate amount and type of insurance, that in no event did we harm the vendor, and thus their damages claim is without merit. We plan to vigorously defend against their claims while pursuing our own.

F-19


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012

Note 7 — Commitments and Contingencies  – (continued)

Government Contracting

Payments to the Company on cost-plus-fee contracts are provisional and are subject to adjustment upon audit by the Defense Contract Audit Agency and BARDA. In our opinion, adjustments that may result from audits are not expected to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Registration Rights Agreements

We entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with the investors who participated in the July 2009 private placement of convertible notes and related warrants. We subsequently filed two registration statements on Form S-3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission to register the shares underlying the convertible notes and related warrants, which registration statements have been declared effective. We are obligated to maintain the registration statements effective until the date when all shares underlying the convertible notes and related warrants (and any other securities issued or issuable with respect to in exchange for such shares) have been sold. The convertible notes were converted or extinguished in 2010, although the related warrants remain outstanding. The warrants will expire on January 28, 2015.

We have separate registration rights agreements with investors, under which we have obligations to keep the corresponding registration statements effective until the registrable securities (as defined in each agreement) have been sold, and under which we may have separate obligations to file registration statements in the future on either a demand or “piggy-back” basis or both.

Under the terms of the convertible notes, which were converted or extinguished in 2010, if after the 2nd consecutive business day (other than during an allowable blackout period) on which sales of all of the securities required to be included on the registration statement cannot be made pursuant to the registration statement (a “Maintenance Failure”), we will be required to pay to each selling stockholder a one-time payment of 1.0% of the aggregate principal amount of the convertible notes relating to the affected shares on the initial day of a Maintenance Failure. Our total maximum obligation under this provision at December 31, 2012, would be approximately $0.2 million.

Following a Maintenance Failure, we will also be required to make to each selling stockholder monthly payments of 1.0% of the aggregate principal amount of the convertible notes relating to the affected shares on every 30th day after the initial day of a Maintenance Failure, in each case prorated for shorter periods and until the failure is cured. Our total maximum obligation under this provision would be approximate $0.2 million for each month until the failure, if it occurs, is cured.

Note 8 — Stockholders’ Equity

Common Stock

In April 2010, we completed a public offering of 1,666,668 shares of our common stock at $1.50 per share and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.89 per share, generating gross proceeds of approximately $2.5 million. The warrants became exercisable on October 13, 2010 and expire on October 13, 2015 and are classified as derivative instruments. Placement fees of approximately $175,000 and legal and other fees of approximately $140,000 were incurred in connection with this transaction.

In July 2010, we completed a public offering of 2,785,714 shares of our common stock at $1.40 per share and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,323,214 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.63 per share, generating gross proceeds of approximately $3.9 million. The warrants became exercisable on January 23, 2011 and expire on January 23, 2017 and are classified as derivative instruments. Placement fees of approximately $260,000 and legal and other fees of approximately $145,000 were incurred in connection with this transaction.

F-20


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012

Note 8 — Stockholders’ Equity  – (continued)

In November 2010, we completed an underwritten public offering of 4,945,000 shares of our common stock at a price to the public of $3.50 per share, generating gross proceeds of approximately $17.3 million. We incurred offering expenses of approximately $1.0 million and legal and other fees of approximately $0.4 million in connection with this transaction.

In June 2011, we completed a public offering of 1,857,143 shares of common stock at $3.50 per share inclusive of warrants to purchase up to an additional 371,423 shares of common stock. The warrants are exercisable immediately at an exercise price of $3.50 per share until the fifth anniversary of the date of issuance which is June 15, 2016. The warrants are classified as derivative instruments because they include net settlement provisions. We received gross proceeds of approximately $6.5 million and net proceeds of approximately $5.1 million for stock and $0.7 million for derivative instruments.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan

In 2007, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2007 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2007 Plan”) which provides for the granting of incentive and non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance units, restricted common awards and performance bonuses (collectively “awards”) to Company officers and employees. Additionally, the 2007 Plan authorizes the granting of non-qualified stock options and restricted stock awards to Company directors and to independent consultants.

In 2008, the Company’s shareholders approved amendments to the 2007 Plan, increasing from 3.5 million shares to 4.6 million shares the maximum number of shares authorized for issuance under the plan and adding an evergreen provision pursuant to which the number of shares authorized for issuance under the plan will increase automatically in each year, beginning in 2009 and continuing through 2015, according to certain limits set forth in the 2007 Plan. At December 31, 2012, there are approximately 8.2 million shares approved for issuance under the 2007 plan, of which approximately 1.3 million shares are available to be issued. The Board of Directors in conjunction with management determines who receives awards, the vesting conditions and the exercise price. Options may have a maximum term of ten years.

The following tables summarize the activity of the 2007 Plan for options:

     
  Shares   Weighted-Average Exercise Price   Weighted-
Average Remaining Contractual Term
Options
                          
Outstanding January 1, 2010     4,913,366     $ 3.88       8.1  
Granted     2,722,131       2.50           
Exercised     (22,316 )      2.56           
Forfeited     (2,273,768 )      3.89           
Outstanding, December 31, 2010     5,339,413     $ 3.18       8.3  
Granted     1,934,566       1.71           
Exercised     (44,464 )      2.66           
Forfeited     (936,533 )      3.07           
Outstanding, December 31, 2011     6,292,982     $ 2.74       8.0  
Granted     852,139       1.22           
Exercised     (31,474 )      1.24           
Forfeited     (888,035 )      2.91           
Outstanding, December 31, 2012     6,225,612     $ 2.52       7.4  

F-21


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012

Note 8 — Stockholders’ Equity  – (continued)

     
  Shares   Weighted-Average Exercise Price   Weighted-
Average Remaining Contractual Term
Exercisable, December 31, 2012     4,044,636     $ 2.86       6.6  
Vested and expected to vest, December 31, 2012     5,963,894     $ 2.55       7.3  

The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between (i) the closing price of the common stock at December 31, 2012 and (ii) the exercise price of the underlying awards, multiplied by the number of options that had an exercise price less than the closing price on the last trading day. Our outstanding and exercisable options had no aggregate intrinsic value as of December 31, 2012, as the exercise price of all outstanding and exercisable options was below the closing price of the common stock at December 31, 2012.

At December 31, 2012, total compensation costs for unvested stock option awards outstanding approximated $2.2 million, net of estimated forfeitures, which we expect to recognize as stock compensation expense over a weighted average period of 2.37 years.

Valuation assumptions used to determine fair value of share-based compensation

The weighted-average grant date fair value for options granted in 2012, 2011 and 2010 approximated $0.86, $1.17 and $1.88, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $9,067, $34,935 and $29,319, respectively. The total fair value of awards vested during 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $2,071,649, $2,259,625 and $2,300,053, respectively. The fair value for the 2012, 2011 and 2010 awards were estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the following assumptions:

     
  December 31,
     2012   2011   2010
Weighted-average volatility     86%       83%       87%  
Risk-free rate     0.79% – 1.18%       0.79% – 2.79%       0.28% – 3.2%  
Expected annual dividend yield                  
Expected weighted-average life, in years     5.9       5.9       6.0  

The valuation assumptions were determined as follows:

Weighted average volatility:  We determine expected volatility by using our historical volatility weighted 50% and the average historical volatility from comparable public companies with an expected term consistent with the expected term of our options weighted 50%.
Risk-free interest rate:  The yield on zero-coupon U.S. Treasury securities for a period that is commensurate with the expected term of the award.
Expected annual dividend yield:  The estimate for annual dividends is zero because we have not historically paid a dividend and do not intend to do so in the foreseeable future.
Expected life:  The expected term of the awards represents the period of time that the awards are expected to be outstanding. The Company estimated the expected term using the “simplified-method” as it does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable estimate.

F-22


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012

Note 8 — Stockholders’ Equity  – (continued)

The following table summarizes the activity of the 2007 plan for restricted shares:

     
  Shares   Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value   Aggregate Intrinsic
Value
Restricted Shares
                          
Outstanding January 1, 2010     305,316     $ 3.36     $ 598,419  
Granted     35,000       2.67           
Vested     (101,899 )      3.29           
Forfeited     (127,286 )      3.95           
Outstanding, December 31, 2010     111,131     $ 2.92     $ 470,084  
Granted     145,000       1.43           
Vested     (123,066 )      2.59           
Forfeited     (9,168 )      2.46           
Outstanding, December 31, 2011     123,897     $ 1.53     $ 157,349  
Granted                     
Vested     (110,564 )      1.53           
Forfeited                     
Outstanding, December 31, 2012     13,333     $ 1.59     $ 14,933  

Warrants

At December 31, 2012 and 2011 there were warrants outstanding to purchase 5,620,128 and 5,573,544 shares of our common stock, respectively. At December 31, 2010, there were warrants outstanding to purchase 5,202,121 shares of our common stock (of which 1,323,214 were not exercisable until January 2011). The warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2012 were as follows:

       
  Number of Common Shares
Underlying Warrants
  Issue Date/Exercisable Date   Exercise Price   Expiration Date
       100,778 (1)      Mar-07/Mar-07       $3.97       Mar-17  
       705,354 (2)      Mar-09/Sep-09       $3.00       Sep-14  
       2,572,775 (1)      Jul-09/Jan-10       $2.50       Jan-15  
       500,000 (2)      Apr-10/Oct-10       $1.89       Oct-15  
       1,323,214 (2)      Jul-10/Jan-11       $1.63       Jan-17  
       371,423 (2)      Jun-11/Jun-11       $3.50       Jun-16  
       46,584 (1)      Mar-12/Mar-12       $1.61       Mar-22  
       5,620,128                    

(1) These warrants to purchase common stock are classified as equity.
(2) These warrants to purchase common stock are classified as derivative liabilities. The fair value of these liabilities (see note 4) is remeasured at the end of every reporting period and the change in fair value is reported in the consolidated statements of operations as other income (expense).

F-23


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012

Note 9 — Income Taxes

The actual income tax provision differs from the expected income tax provision computed at the federal statutory rate as follows:

     
  December 31,
     2012   2011   2010
Statutory federal tax benefit   $ (1,604,648 )    $ (1,291,175 )    $ (11,848,754 ) 
State income tax, net of federal benefit     (19,918 )      (232,489 )      (1,284,265 ) 
Other permanent differences     4,975       22,101       607,981  
Foreign rate differential     (80,292 )      (50,173 )      2,492,478  
Rate change     388,656              
Lobbying costs     122,204              
Write-off of expired/forfeited options and conversion of notes     193,605       391,826       3,071,189  
Canada transfer pricing and expiring attributes           (8,965,832 )       
Expiration (reversal of expiration) of net operating losses           (4,745,271 )      5,053,927  
Other     1,393,366       732,322       309,840  
Subtotal     397,948       (14,138,691 )      (1,597,604 ) 
Decrease (increase) in valuation allowance     (202,451 )      14,138,691       1,597,604  
Income tax expense   $ 195,497     $     $  

Our net deferred tax assets consisted of the following:

   
  December 31,
     2012   2011
Net operating loss carry forwards   $ 58,334,073     $ 62,873,360  
Fixed assets/intangibles     114,826       49,389  
Research and development credits/loss carry forwards     3,278,995       3,291,651  
Stock based compensation     3,047,573       2,611,770  
Accrued expenses and other     2,789,776       1,368,036  
Total deferred tax assets     67,565,243       70,194,206  
Deferred tax liabilities:
                 
Intercompany bad debt     (3,978,944 )      (6,209,959 ) 
Total deferred tax liabilities     (3,978,944 )      (6,209,959 ) 
Net deferred tax assets     63,586,299       63,984,247  
Less: valuation allowance     (63,781,796 )      (63,984,247 ) 
Net deferred tax assets   $ (195,497 )    $  

For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we increased the valuation allowance to fully reserve for the value of deferred tax assets. Due to continued operating losses, there is no indication that it is more likely than not that we will be able to utilize our deferred tax assets. As such, there have been no recoveries of previously recorded valuation allowances in 2012 or 2011.

The U.S. federal net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $134.3 million will begin to expire in various years beginning in 2021. Under Section 382 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, the Company’s net operating loss carry forwards may be limited due to underlying ownership of its common stock. The Canadian federal net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $3.6 million will begin to expire in 2030. The

F-24


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012

Note 9 — Income Taxes  – (continued)

Quebec Provincial net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $3.6 million will begin to expire in 2030. The UK net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $19.6 million have an unlimited life.

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of the deferred tax asset is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which the net operating loss carry forwards are available. We consider projected future taxable income, the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities and available tax planning strategies that can be implemented by us in making this assessment on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis. Based upon these factors, we have established a full valuation allowance against the net deferred tax asset in 2012, consistent with 2011. The Company has a deferred tax liability related to tax deductible goodwill. The scheduled reversal of this deferred tax liability is not determinable. As such, that deferred tax liability cannot be used as a source of future taxable income with which to realize the deferred tax assets. The cumulative amount of this deferred tax liability is $195,497.

We have analyzed tax positions in all jurisdictions where the Company is required to file an income tax return and have concluded that we do not have any material unrecognized tax benefits. As such, we believe that any of our uncertain tax positions would not result in adjustments to our effective income tax rate.

Note 10 — Supplemental Financial Information (Unaudited)

Quarterly financial information for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 is presented in the following tables:

       
  Three months ended
     March 31,   June 30,   September 30,   December 31,
Fiscal year 2012
                                   
Revenue   $ 6,149,052     $ 6,316,998     $ 6,696,126     $ 6,013,711  
Loss from operations     (1,590,696 )      (1,458,204 )      (1,790,377 )      (1,427,113 ) 
Net loss     (2,679,888 )      (756,543 )      (213,936 )      (1,269,748 ) 
Net loss per share, basic     (0.06 )      (0.02 )      0.00       (0.03 ) 
Net loss per share, diluted     (0.06 )      (0.02 )      0.00       (0.03 ) 
Fiscal year 2011
                                   
Revenue   $ 6,337,722     $ 6,428,840     $ 5,260,057     $ 6,239,655  
Loss from operations     (4,539,935 )      (3,081,320 )      (3,021,914 )      (1,082,562 ) 
Net (loss) income     (2,075,657 )      (2,437,613 )      (33,496 )      749,193  
Net (loss) income per share, basic     (0.04 )      (0.05 )      0.00       0.02  
Net (loss) income per share, diluted     (0.04 )      (0.05 )      0.00       0.02  

F-25


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

   
  June 30, 2013 (Unaudited)   December 31, 2012
ASSETS
                 
Current assets:
                 
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 15,789,909     $ 12,701,517  
Billed accounts receivable     1,540,060       2,432,641  
Unbilled accounts receivable     3,694,631       4,114,442  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets     667,850       547,245  
Total current assets     21,692,450       19,795,845  
Property and equipment, net     460,101       483,976  
Other long-term assets and deferred costs     85,907       113,130  
Goodwill     2,348,453       2,348,453  
Total assets   $ 24,586,911     $ 22,741,404  
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
                 
Current liabilities:
                 
Accounts payable   $ 2,992,549     $ 1,697,280  
Accrued expenses and other liabilities     2,053,522       2,328,877  
Deferred revenue     508,175       1,381,755  
Current portion of long-term debt     999,996       749,997  
Short-term debt     1,168,143       1,330,507  
Total current liabilities     7,722,385       7,488,416  
Other long-term liabilities     577,725       579,427  
Long-term debt, less current portion     1,217,791       1,704,108  
Derivative instruments     1,848,566       1,295,613  
Total liabilities     11,366,467       11,067,564  
Stockholders' equity:
                 
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 51,173,919 and 48,352,651 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively     5,117       4,835  
Additional paid-in-capital     215,392,930       210,495,905  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss     (220,274 )      (217,328 ) 
Accumulated deficit     (201,957,329 )      (198,609,572 ) 
Total stockholders' equity     13,220,444       11,673,840  
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity   $ 24,586,911     $ 22,741,404  

 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

F-26


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

       
  Three months ended June 30,   Six months ended June 30,
     2013   2012   2013   2012
Revenue   $ 4,295,400     $ 6,316,998     $ 10,770,538     $ 12,466,050  
Operating Expenses:
                                   
Research and development     3,402,545       4,918,655       8,636,020       9,624,012  
General and administrative     2,332,730       2,780,099       4,612,525       5,728,580  
Depreciation     41,854       76,448       94,456       162,358  
Total operating expenses     5,777,129       7,775,202       13,343,001       15,514,950  
Loss from operations     (1,481,729 )      (1,458,204 )      (2,572,463 )      (3,048,900 ) 
Other income (expense):
                                   
Interest income     1,656       4,819       2,439       7,807  
Interest expense     (100,027 )      (111,353 )      (199,818 )      (114,381 ) 
Change in fair value of derivative instruments     352,824       823,809       (552,953 )      (167,853 ) 
Other income (expense)     2,110       519       (4,013 )      53,434  
Total other income (expense)     256,563       717,794       (754,345 )      (220,993 ) 
Net loss before provision for income taxes     (1,225,166 )      (740,410 )      (3,326,808 )      (3,269,893 ) 
Provision for income taxes     (11,206 )      (16,133 )      (20,949 )      (166,538 ) 
Net loss   $ (1,236,372 )    $ (756,543 )    $ (3,347,757 )    $ (3,436,431 ) 
Basic and diluted net loss per share   $ (0.02 )    $ (0.02 )    $ (0.07 )    $ (0.07 ) 
Weighted average shares used in calculation of basic and diluted net loss per share     49,749,167       48,325,945       49,058,014       48,297,919  

 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

F-27


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

       
  Three months ended June 30,   Six months ended June 30,
     2013   2012   2013   2012
Net loss   $ (1,236,372 )    $ (756,543 )    $ (3,347,757 )    $ (3,436,431 ) 
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
                                   
Foreign currency translation adjustment     (1,262 )      (19,902 )      (2,946 )      (6,533 ) 
Comprehensive loss   $ (1,237,634 )    $ (776,445 )    $ (3,350,703 )    $ (3,442,964 ) 

 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

F-28


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

   
  Six months ended June 30,
     2013   2012
Operating activities
                 
Net loss   $ (3,347,757 )    $ (3,436,431 ) 
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
                 
Share-based compensation expense     652,589       1,060,705  
Change in fair value of derivative instruments     552,953       167,853  
Depreciation expense     94,456       162,358  
Deferred provision for income taxes     20,949       166,538  
Non-cash interest expense     70,473       40,470  
Gain on the disposal of property and equipment           (66,626 ) 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
                 
Billed accounts receivable     892,581       979,612  
Unbilled accounts receivable     419,811       (1,765,096 ) 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets     355,878       248,707  
Accounts payable     1,292,796       617,014  
Accrued expenses and other liabilities     (366,136 )      408,088  
Deferred revenue     (873,580 )      (495,571 ) 
Net cash used by operating activities     (234,987 )      (1,912,379 ) 
Investing activities
                 
Purchase of property and equipment     (70,581 )       
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment           67,400  
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities     (70,581 )      67,400  
Financing activities
                 
Proceeds from issuance (repayment) of long-term debt     (249,999 )      2,500,000  
Net repayment of revolving credit agreement     (162,364 )       
Deferred financing costs           (216,460 ) 
Change in restricted cash requirements           100,000  
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs     3,810,403       38,983  
Other           (32,960 ) 
Net cash provided by financing activities     3,398,040       2,389,563  
Effects of exchange rates on cash     (4,080 )      (4,434 ) 
Increases in cash and cash equivalents     3,088,392       540,150  
Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period     12,701,517       11,236,771  
Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period   $ 15,789,909     $ 11,776,921  
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
                 
Cash paid for interest   $ 129,345     $ 73,911  
Noncash financing activities
                 
Value of warrants issued to lender in connection with loan   $     $ 69,876  

 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

F-29


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2013

Note 1 — Organization and Business

We are a biopharmaceutical company focused on developing biodefense countermeasure applications. We are subject to those risks associated with any biopharmaceutical company that has substantial expenditures for research and development. There can be no assurance that our research and development projects will be successful, that the products we may develop will obtain necessary regulatory approval, or that any approved product will be commercially viable. In addition, we operate in an environment of rapid technological change and are largely dependent on the services and expertise of our employees, consultants and other third parties.

Historically, we have performed under government contracts and grants and raised funds from investors to sustain our operations.

Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PharmAthene, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which are necessary to present fairly our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2012 has been derived from audited consolidated financial statements at that date. The interim results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results that may occur for the full fiscal year. Certain information and footnote disclosure normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to instructions, rules and regulations prescribed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. We believe that the disclosures provided herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading when these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We currently operate in one business segment.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include significant estimates for the value and the expected economic life of our intangible assets, the amount of our net operating losses available for income tax purposes, our share-based compensation, the value of our derivative financial instruments, among other things. Because of the use of estimates inherent in the financial reporting process, actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currency of our wholly owned foreign subsidiaries is their local currency. Assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries are translated into United States dollars based on exchange rates at the end of the reporting period; income and expense items are translated at the weighted average exchange rates prevailing during the reporting period. Translation adjustments for subsidiaries that have not been sold, substantially liquidated or otherwise disposed of are accumulated in other comprehensive income (loss), a component of stockholders’ equity. Transaction gains or losses are included in the determination of net loss.

Comprehensive Loss and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive loss includes the total of our net loss and all other changes in equity other than transactions with owners, which currently only includes changes in equity for cumulative translation

F-30


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2013

Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

adjustments resulting from the consolidation of foreign subsidiaries as the financial statements of the subsidiaries located outside of the United States are accounted for using the local currency as the functional currency.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents are stated at market value. We consider all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Revolving Line of Credit and Term Loan

As discussed further in Note 6, we entered into a loan agreement with General Electric Capital Corporation (“GE Capital”) in March 2012. As part of that agreement, we issued stock purchase warrants to GE Capital that expire in March 2022 (see Note 5). The fair value of the warrants was charged to additional paid-in-capital, resulting in a debt discount to the term loan at the date of issuance. The debt discount and the financing costs incurred in connection with the agreement are being amortized over the term of the loan using the effective interest method. The amortization of both the debt discount and deferred financing costs are included in interest expense in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Significant Customers and Accounts Receivable

Our primary customers are the U.S. Department of Defense (the “DoD”) — Chemical Biological Medical Systems (“CBMS”), and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (“BARDA”). As of June 30, 2013 and December 31 2012, the Company’s billed and unbilled receivable balances were comprised solely of receivables from CBMS and BARDA.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the fair value of net identifiable assets associated with acquisitions. We review the recoverability of goodwill annually as of December 31 by comparing our market value (as measured by our stock price multiplied by the number of outstanding shares as of the end of the year) to the net book value of our equity. If our market value exceeds our net book value, no further analysis is required. Changes in our business strategy or adverse changes in market conditions could impact the impairment analyses and require the recognition of an impairment charge equal to the excess of the carrying value over its estimated fair value. We completed our last annual impairment assessment of goodwill as of December 31, 2012 and determined that there was no impairment as of that date.

Revenue Recognition

We generate our revenue from different types of contractual arrangements: cost-plus-fee contracts, cost reimbursable grants and fixed price contracts.

Revenues on cost-plus-fee contracts are recognized in an amount equal to the costs incurred during the period plus an estimate of the applicable fee earned. The estimate of the applicable fee earned is determined by reference to the contract: if the contract defines the fee in terms of risk-based milestones and specifies the fees to be earned upon the completion of each milestone, then the fee is recognized when the related milestones are earned, as further described below; otherwise, we estimate the fee earned in a given period by using a proportional performance method based on costs incurred during the period as compared to total estimated project costs and application of the resulting fraction to the total project fee specified in the contract.

Under the milestone method of revenue recognition, substantive milestone payments (including milestone payments for fees) contained in research and development arrangements are recognized as revenue when: (i) the milestones are achieved; (ii) no further performance obligations with respect to the milestone exist; (iii) collection is reasonably assured; and (iv) substantive effort was necessary to achieve the milestone.

F-31


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2013

Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

Milestones are considered substantive if all of the following conditions are met:

it is commensurate with either our performance to meet the milestone or the enhancement of the value of the delivered item or items as a result of a specific outcome resulting from our performance to achieve the milestone,
it relates solely to past performance,
the value of the milestone is reasonable relative to all the deliverables and payment terms (including other potential milestone consideration) within the arrangement.

If a milestone is deemed not to be substantive, the Company recognizes the portion of the milestone payment as revenue that correlates to work already performed; the remaining portion of the milestone payment is deferred and recognized as revenue as the Company completes its performance obligations.

Revenue on fixed price contracts (without substantive milestones as described above) is recognized on the percentage-of-completion method. The percentage-of-completion method recognizes income as the contract progresses (generally related to the costs incurred in providing the services required under the contract). The use of the percentage-of-completion method depends on the ability to make reasonable dependable estimates and the fact that circumstances may necessitate frequent revision of estimates does not indicate that the estimates are unreliable for the purpose for which they are used.

As a result of our revenue recognition policies and the billing provisions contained in our contracts, the timing of customer billings may differ from the timing of recognizing revenue. Amounts invoiced to customers in excess of revenue recognized are reflected on the balance sheet as deferred revenue. Amounts recognized as revenue in excess of amounts billed to customers are reflected on the balance sheet as unbilled accounts receivable.

We analyze each cost reimbursable grant to determine whether we should report such reimbursements as revenue or as an offset to our expenses incurred. For the three months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded approximately $0.4 million of costs reimbursed by the government as an offset to research and development expenses (no such reimbursements were recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2013). For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we recorded approximately $0.02 million and $1.0 million, respectively, of costs reimbursed by the government as an offset to research and development expenses.

Share-Based Compensation

We expense the estimated fair value of share-based awards granted to employees under our stock compensation plans. The fair value of stock options is determined at the grant date using an option pricing model. We have estimated the fair value of each stock option award using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes model considers, among other factors, the expected life of the award and the expected volatility of our stock price. The value of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense on a straight line basis over the employee’s requisite service period.

The fair value of restricted stock grants is determined based on the closing price of our common stock on the award date and is recognized as expense ratably over the requisite service period.

Employee share-based compensation expense recognized in the three months and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was calculated based on awards ultimately expected to vest and has been reduced for estimated forfeitures at a rate of approximately 12%, based on historical forfeitures.

F-32


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2013

Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

Share-based compensation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was:

   
  Three months ended June 30,
     2013   2012
Research and development   $ 73,859     $ 127,076  
General and administrative     250,149       384,965  
Total share-based compensation expense   $ 324,008     $ 512,041  

During the three months ended June 30, 2013, we granted 145,000 options to employees and nonemployee directors and made no restricted stock grants. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, we granted 185,000 options to employees and nonemployee directors and made no restricted stock grants.

Share-based compensation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was:

   
  Six months ended June 30,
     2013   2012
Research and development   $ 162,493     $ 244,143  
General and administrative     490,096       816,562  
Total share-based compensation expense   $ 652,589     $ 1,060,705  

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, we granted 205,000 options to employees, nonemployee directors and consultants and made no restricted stock grants. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we granted 200,948 options to employees and nonemployee directors and made no restricted stock grants.

At June 30, 2013, we had total unrecognized share-based compensation expense related to unvested awards of approximately $1.8 million, net of estimated forfeitures, which we expect to recognize as expense over a weighted-average period of 2.13 years.

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes using the asset and liability approach, which requires the recognition of future tax benefits or liabilities on the temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of our assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized. We also recognize a tax benefit from uncertain tax positions only if it is “more likely than not” that the position is sustainable based on its technical merits. Our policy is to recognize interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense.

Our provision for income taxes was $11,206 and $16,133 during the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The provision for income taxes was $20,949 and $166,538 during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The provision for income taxes is a result of the difference between the treatment of goodwill for income tax purposes and for U.S. GAAP, resulting in a deferred tax liability which cannot be used to offset deferred tax assets. This deferred tax liability is included in our condensed consolidated balance sheet in other long-term liabilities.

Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share

Income (loss) per share:  Basic income (loss) per share is computed by dividing consolidated net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, excluding unvested restricted stock.

For periods of net income when the effects are not anti-dilutive, diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing our net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding and the impact of all potential dilutive common shares, consisting primarily of stock options, unvested restricted stock and stock

F-33


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2013

Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

purchase warrants. The dilutive impact of our dilutive potential common shares resulting from stock options and stock purchase warrants is determined by applying the treasury stock method.

For the periods of net loss, diluted loss per share is calculated similarly to basic loss per share because the impact of all dilutive potential common shares is anti-dilutive due to the net losses. A total of approximately 11.7 million and 11.6 million potential dilutive securities have been excluded in the calculation of diluted net loss per share in the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

We have evaluated all issued and unadopted Accounting Standards Updates and believe the adoption of these will not have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.

Note 3 — Fair Value Measurements

We define fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We report assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value using a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

An asset’s or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. At each reporting period, we perform a detailed analysis of our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value. All assets and liabilities for which the fair value measurement is based on significant unobservable inputs or instruments which trade infrequently and therefore have little or no price transparency are classified as Level 3.

We have segregated our financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis into the most appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to determine the fair value at the measurement date in the table below. We have no non-financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. As of June 30, 2013 and 2012 we had Level 3 derivative liabilities of approximately $1.8 million and $2.1 million, respectively.

F-34


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2013

Note 3 — Fair Value Measurements  – (continued)

The following table represents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

       
  As of June 30, 2013
     Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Balance
Liabilities
                                   
Derivative instruments   $     $     $ 1,848,566     $ 1,848,566  

       
  As of December 31, 2012
     Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Balance
Liabilities
                                   
Derivative instruments   $     $     $ 1,295,613     $ 1,295,613  

The following table sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2013:

     
Description   Balance as of December 31, 2012   Unrealized Losses   Balance as of June 30,
2013
Derivative liabilities related to stock purchase warrants   $ 1,295,613     $ 552,953     $ 1,848,566  

The following table sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2012:

     
Description   Balance as of December 31, 2011   Unrealized Losses   Balance as of June 30,
2012
Derivative liabilities related to stock purchase warrants   $ 1,886,652     $ 167,853     $ 2,054,505  

At June 30, 2013 and 2012, derivative liabilities are comprised of warrants to purchase 2,899,991 shares of common stock. The warrants are considered to be derivative liabilities due to the presence of net settlement features and, as a result, are recorded at fair value at each balance sheet date, with changes in fair value recorded in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of our warrants is determined based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Use of the Black-Scholes option pricing model requires the use of unobservable inputs such as the expected term, anticipated volatility and expected dividends.

   
Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value at 6/30/2013   Valuation Technique   Unobservable Inputs
$1,848,566
    Black-Scholes option pricing model       Expected term  
                Expected dividends  
                Anticipated volatility  

Changes in any of the assumptions related to the unobservable inputs identified above may change the stock purchase warrants’ fair value; increases in expected term, anticipated volatility and expected dividends generally result in increases in fair value, while decreases in these unobservable inputs generally result in decreases in fair value. Gains and losses on the fair value adjustments for these derivative instruments are classified in other expenses as the change in fair value of derivative instruments in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. The $0.6 million change in the market value of derivative instruments during the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 is due primarily to the change in the closing market price of our common stock, which was $1.12 per share as of December 31, 2012 and $1.59 per share as of June 28,

F-35


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2013

Note 3 — Fair Value Measurements  – (continued)

2013. The $0.2 million change in the market value of derivative instruments during the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 is also due primarily to the change in our closing stock price, which was $1.27 per share as of December 30, 2011 and $1.39 per share as of June 29, 2012.

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

The Company measures its long-lived assets, including, property and equipment and goodwill, at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets are recognized at fair value when they are deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired (see Note 2).

Note 4 — Commitments and Contingencies

SIGA Litigation

In December 2006, we filed a complaint against SIGA Technologies, Inc. (“SIGA”) in the Delaware Court of Chancery. The complaint alleged, among other things, that we have the right to license exclusively development and marketing rights for SIGA’s drug candidate, ArestvyrTM (Tecovirimat), pursuant to a Merger Agreement between the parties that was terminated in 2006. The complaint also alleged that SIGA failed to negotiate in good faith the terms of such a license pursuant to the terminated Merger Agreement.

In September 2011, the Court issued an opinion in the case finding that SIGA had breached certain contractual obligations to us and upholding our claims of promissory estoppel. The Court awarded us the right to receive 50% of all net profits (as defined in the court’s final judgment) related to the sale of ArestvyrTM and related products for 10 years following initial commercial sale of the drug once SIGA earns $40 million in net profits from the sale of ArestvyrTM and related products. The Court also awarded us one-third of our reasonable attorney's fees and expert witness fees, which amounts to approximately $2.4 million plus interest. In May 2012, the Court issued its final judgment. SIGA appealed aspects of the decision to the Delaware Supreme Court. In response, we cross-appealed other aspects of the decision.

In May 2013, the Delaware Supreme Court issued its ruling on the appeal, affirming the lower Court’s finding of breach of contract, reversing its finding of promissory estoppel, and remanding the case back to the Court of Chancery to reconsider the remedy and award of attorney's fees and expert witness costs in light of the Supreme Court’s opinion.

We can provide no assurances that on remand the Delaware Court of Chancery will re-instate its prior remedy or order another remedy for us, that SIGA will not appeal any subsequent decision by the Court of Chancery, or that SIGA will not be successful in any subsequent appeal. We have not yet recorded any amount due from SIGA in relation to this case.

Government Contracting

Payments to the Company on cost-plus-fee contracts are provisional. The accuracy and appropriateness of costs charged to U.S. Government contracts are subject to regulation, audit and possible disallowance by the Defense Contract Audit Agency and other government agencies such as BARDA. Accordingly, costs billed or billable to U.S. Government customers are subject to potential adjustment upon audit by such agencies. In our opinion, adjustments that may result from audits are not expected to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Changes in government policies, priorities or funding levels through agency or program budget reductions by the U.S. Congress or executive agencies could materially adversely affect the Company's financial condition or results of operations. Furthermore, contracts with the U.S. Government may be terminated or suspended by the U.S. Government at any time, with or without cause. Such contract suspensions or terminations could result in unreimbursable expenses or charges or otherwise adversely affect the Company's financial condition and/or results of operations.

F-36


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2013

Note 4 — Commitments and Contingencies  – (continued)

Registration Rights Agreements

We entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with the investors who participated in the July 2009 private placement of convertible notes and related warrants. We subsequently filed two registration statements on Form S-3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission to register the resale of the shares issuable upon conversion of the convertible notes and exercise of the related warrants, which registration statements have been declared effective. We are obligated to maintain the registration statements effective until the date when such shares (and any other securities issued or issuable with respect to or in exchange for such shares) have been sold. The convertible notes were converted or extinguished in 2010, although the related warrants remain outstanding. The warrants will expire on January 28, 2015.

We have separate registration rights agreements with investors, under which we have obligations to keep the corresponding registration statements effective until the registrable securities (as defined in each agreement) have been sold, and under which we may have separate obligations to file registration statements in the future on either a demand or “piggy-back” basis or both.

Under the terms of the convertible notes, which were converted or extinguished in 2010, if after the 2nd consecutive business day (other than during an allowable blackout period) on which sales of all of the securities required to be included on the registration statement cannot be made pursuant to the registration statement (a “Maintenance Failure”), we will be required to pay to each selling stockholder a one-time payment of 1.0% of the aggregate principal amount of the convertible notes relating to the affected shares on the initial day of a Maintenance Failure. Our total maximum obligation under this provision at June 30, 2013, would be approximately $0.2 million.

Following a Maintenance Failure, we will also be required to make to each selling stockholder monthly payments of 1.0% of the aggregate principal amount of the convertible notes relating to the affected shares on every 30th day after the initial day of a Maintenance Failure, in each case prorated for shorter periods and until the failure is cured. Our total maximum obligation under this provision would be approximate $0.2 million for each month until the failure, if it occurs, is cured.

Vendor Litigation

One of our vendors mishandled the storage of certain biological materials. The vendor filed suit against us in Delaware state court and we filed suit against the vendor in Maryland state court. The case was settled and we received approximately $0.5 million as a result of the settlement during the second quarter of 2013 which was recorded as a reduction in research and development expenses.

Note 5 — Stockholders’ Equity

Long-Term Incentive Plan

In 2007, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2007 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2007 Plan”) which provides for the granting of incentive and non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance units, restricted common awards and performance bonuses (collectively “awards”) to Company officers and employees. Additionally, the 2007 Plan authorizes the granting of non-qualified stock options and restricted stock awards to Company directors and to independent consultants.

In 2008, the Company’s shareholders approved amendments to the 2007 Plan, increasing from 3.5 million shares to 4.6 million shares the maximum number of shares authorized for issuance under the plan and adding an evergreen provision pursuant to which the number of shares authorized for issuance under the plan will increase automatically in each year, beginning in 2009 and continuing through 2015, according to certain limits set forth in the 2007 Plan. At June 30, 2013, there are approximately 9.3 million shares approved for issuance under the 2007 plan, of which approximately 2.5 million shares are available to be issued. The Board of Directors in conjunction with management determines who receives awards, the vesting conditions and the exercise price. Options may have a maximum term of ten years.

F-37


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2013

Note 5 — Stockholders’ Equity  – (continued)

Stock Purchase Warrants

At June 30, 2013 and 2012 there were warrants outstanding to purchase 5,620,128 shares of our common stock, respectively. The warrants outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

       
  Number of Common Shares Underlying Warrants   Issue Date/Exercisable Date   Exercise Price   Expiration Date
       100,778 (1)      Mar-07/Mar-07       $3.97       Mar-17  
       705,354 (2)      Mar-09/Sep-09       $3.00       Sep-14  
       2,572,775 (1)      Jul-09/Jan-10       $2.50       Jan-15  
       500,000 (2)      Apr-10/Oct-10       $1.89       Oct-15  
       1,323,214 (2)      Jul-10/Jan-11       $1.63       Jan-17  
       371,423 (2)      Jun-11/Jun-11       $3.50       Jun-16  
       46,584 (1)      Mar-12/Mar-12       $1.61       Mar-22  
       5,620,128                    

(1) These warrants to purchase common stock are classified as equity.
(2) Because of the presence of net settlement provisions, these warrants to purchase common stock are classified as derivative liabilities. The fair value of these liabilities (see Note 3) is remeasured at the end of every reporting period and the change in fair value is reported in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations as other income (expense).

Note 6 — Financing Transactions

Controlled Equity Offering

On March 25, 2013, we entered into a controlled equity offering arrangement with a sales agent pursuant to which we may offer and sell, from time to time, through the agent shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $15.0 million. Under the arrangement, the agent may sell shares by any method permitted by law and deemed to be an “at-the-market” offering as defined in Rule 415 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, including sales made directly on NYSE MKT, or any other existing trading market for our Common Stock or to or through a market maker. Subject to the terms and conditions of that agreement, the agent will use commercially reasonable efforts, consistent with its normal trading and sales practices and applicable state and federal law, rules and regulations and the rules of NYSE MKT, to sell shares from time to time based upon our instructions. We are not obligated to sell any shares under the arrangement. We are obligated to pay the agent a commission of 3.0% of the aggregate gross proceeds from each sale of shares under the arrangement.

Total expenses incurred for the arrangement and the offering of shares thereunder, excluding commission payable to the agent, were approximately $304,000. Through June 30, 2013, we sold 2,777,336 shares of our common stock under this arrangement resulting in net proceeds (net of commission and offering costs) to the Company of approximately $4.2 million, of which approximately $0.5 million was not received until July 2013. As of June 30, 2013, aggregate gross sales for additional common stock of approximately $10.4 million remained available under the arrangement.

Loan Agreement with GE Capital

On March 30, 2012, we entered into a Loan Agreement with GE Capital. The Loan Agreement provides for a senior secured debt facility, including a $2.5 million term loan and a revolving line of credit of up to $5 million based on our outstanding qualified accounts receivable. On March 30, 2012, the term loan was funded for the full $2.5 million.

F-38


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2013

Note 6 — Financing Transactions  – (continued)

Under the terms of the revolving line of credit, the Company may draw down from the revolving line of credit up to 85% of qualified billed accounts receivable and 80% of qualified unbilled accounts receivable. As of June 30, 2013, the total amount available to draw was approximately $3.2 million, of which $1.2 million was drawn and outstanding.

The fixed interest rate on the term loan is 10.14% per annum. The revolving line of credit has an adjustable interest rate based upon the 3-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), with a floor of 1.5%, plus 5%. As of June 30, 2013, the interest rate was 6.5%. Both the term loan and the revolving line of credit mature in September 2015. Payments on the term loan were originally interest-only for the first 10 months (which has since been extended to 12 months pursuant to terms of the agreement); subsequently, the term loan will fully amortize over its remaining term. Remaining principal payments on the term loan are scheduled as follows:

 
Year   Principal Payments
2013   $ 499,998  
2014     999,996  
2015     750,007  
     $ 2,250,001  

The term loan, net of a debt discount of $32,214, is recorded on our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as follows:

 
Current portion of long-term debt   $ 999,996  
Long-term debt, less current portion   $ 1,217,791  

If we prepay the term loan and terminate the revolving line of credit prior to the scheduled maturity date, we are obligated to pay a prepayment premium equal to 3% of the then outstanding principal amount of the term loan if prepaid during the first two years of the loan and 2% if prepaid during the third year or thereafter. In addition, we are obligated to pay a final payment fee of 3% of the term loan balance. The final payment fee is being accrued and expensed over the term of the agreement, using the effective interest method and is included in other long-term liabilities on our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet.

Our obligations under the Loan Agreement are collateralized by a security interest in substantially all of our assets. While the security interest does not, except in limited circumstances, cover our intellectual property, it does cover any proceeds received by us from the use or sale of our intellectual property.

In connection with the Loan Agreement, we issued GE Capital warrants to purchase 46,584 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.61 per share. The warrants are exercisable immediately and subject to customary and standard anti-dilution adjustments. The warrants are classified in equity and, as a result, the fair value of the warrants was charged to additional paid-in capital resulting in a debt discount at the date of issuance. The debt discount is being amortized over the term of the loan agreement using the effective interest method. Financing costs incurred in connection with this agreement are also being amortized over the term of the agreement using the effective interest method.

The estimated fair value of the Company’s outstanding borrowings under its revolving credit facility at June 30, 2013 was equal to its carrying value as of that date due to the short term nature of the Revolver’s repayment terms. The Company determined the estimated fair value of the Term Loan also approximated its carrying value as of June 30, 2013.

F-39


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2013

Note 7 — Subsequent Events

Proposed Merger

On July 31, 2013, PharmAthene entered into an agreement and plan of merger (the “Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which its wholly owned subsidiary, Taurus Merger Sub, Inc. (“Merger Sub”), will be merged with and into Theraclone Sciences, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Theraclone”), with Theraclone as the surviving subsidiary (the “Merger”).

Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, at the Effective Time (the “Effective Time”), each outstanding share of common stock of Theraclone will be converted into the right to receive a number of shares of PharmAthene common stock equal to the quotient obtained by dividing the fully diluted equity (as defined below) of PharmAthene by the fully diluted equity of Theraclone (the “Exchange Ratio”), less a pro rata share of PharmAthene common stock representing 5% of the merger consideration issuable to the stockholders of Theraclone (the “Escrow Shares”). The Merger Agreement defines “fully diluted equity” to mean, with respect to PharmAthene, the total number of shares outstanding of PharmAthene common stock assuming full conversion or exercise of all then outstanding options and warrants, which, in each case, have an exercise price less than or equal to $2.50 per share, and convertible securities. With respect to Theraclone, “fully diluted equity” means the total number of shares outstanding of Theraclone common stock, assuming full conversion or exercise of all then-outstanding options and warrants and all convertible securities. Holders of Theraclone common stock will receive cash in lieu of fractional shares. In addition, all outstanding Theraclone options, as well as Theraclone’s 2004 Option Plan, will be assumed by PharmAthene. Each option or warrant to purchase one share of Theraclone common stock will be converted into an option or warrant, as the case may be, to purchase a number of shares of PharmAthene common stock representing the number of Theraclone shares for which the exchanged option or warrant was exercisable multiplied by the Exchange Ratio. The exercise price would be proportionately adjusted.

Following the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, the security holders of PharmAthene immediately prior to the Effective Time and the security holders of Theraclone immediately prior to the Effective Time will each own approximately 50% of the fully-diluted equity (without regard to PharmAthene options and warrants having an exercise price greater than $2.50 per share) after the Merger. The Escrow Shares described above, which will serve to secure the Theraclone stockholders’ indemnification obligations under the Merger Agreement, will be deposited with Citibank, N.A., as escrow agent under a separate escrow agreement to be entered into prior to the completion of the Merger. The escrow period will expire nine months from the date of completion of the Merger.

The Merger is intended to qualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

Pursuant to a related board of directors composition agreement between PharmAthene and certain former stockholders of Theraclone, which is expected to be entered into at completion of the Merger (the “Board Composition Agreement”), the nine-member board of directors of post-Merger PharmAthene (the “Board”) will consist of five directors designated by PharmAthene and four directors designated by Theraclone. Those members will initially be Steve Gillis, Ph.D., Wende Hutton and Clifford J. Stocks of Theraclone, and Mitchel Sayare, Ph.D., Eric I. Richman, John M. Gill, Brian A. Markison and Derace L. Schaffer, M.D. of PharmAthene, with a ninth director still to be designated by Theraclone. Under the Board Composition Agreement, the executive officers and directors of PharmAthene, the directors of Theraclone and their affiliates, and certain holders of 5% or more of Theraclone’s Capital stock (collectively, the “Signing Stockholders”) will agree to vote all shares owned by such holders, or over which such holders have voting control, as necessary to ensure that the PharmAthene and Theraclone designees are elected to the Board at each annual or special meeting of stockholders of PharmAthene at which directors are elected or through any action taken by written consent of the stockholders of PharmAthene by which directors are elected. The Signing Stockholders will also agree to cause the resignation of one of PharmAthene’s designees upon the

F-40


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2013

Note 7 — Subsequent Events  – (continued)

earlier of (i) the full settlement or final, non-appealable resolution of PharmAthene’s civil action against SIGA Technologies, Inc. (“SIGA”) (the “SIGA Determination Date”) and (ii) the second anniversary of the completion of the Merger, but not prior to the first anniversary of the completion of the Merger. We refer to this date as the “Designee Resignation Date.” The Board Composition Agreement will obligate the Signing Stockholders to cause half of the members of all committees of the Board to be filled by Theraclone board designees and where a committee consists of an odd number of directors, the third director will be mutually agreed on by the PharmAthene and Theraclone members of such committee. The Board Composition Agreement will terminate on the earliest to occur of the fifth anniversary of the date of the Board Composition Agreement and the SIGA Determination Date, but not prior to the first anniversary of completion of the Merger. The Signing Stockholders may sell their shares free of the rights and obligations under the Board Composition Agreement.

Theraclone’s current chief executive officer, Clifford J. Stocks, is expected to serve as the chief executive officer of the combined company, while Russ Hawkinson, Theraclone’s current chief financial officer, is expected to serve as its chief financial officer. The Merger Agreement obligates PharmAthene to amend its Bylaws to provide that Clifford Stocks may not be removed from his position as chief executive officer of PharmAthene without the approval of at least 66 2/3% of the Board, until the earlier of the second anniversary of the date of the Merger Agreement or such time as there is a period longer than 30 days in which less than five PharmAthene board designees serve on the Board (provided that he may be removed by at least a majority of the then-serving members of PharmAthene’s board of directors following the Designee Resignation Date).

Completion of the Merger is subject to a number of conditions, including, but not limited to (i) approval of the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock in connection with the Merger, and approval of an increase in the authorized number of shares of common stock, by PharmAthene’s stockholders and the adoption and approval of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby by Theraclone’s stockholders; (ii) the effectiveness of a registration statement on Form S-4 to be filed by PharmAthene with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to register the issuance of the shares of PharmAthene common stock in connection with the Merger, which will contain a joint proxy statement/prospectus; (iii) approval for listing on the NYSE MKT LLC of such shares of PharmAthene common stock; (iv) execution of the Board Composition Agreement; (v) exercise of appraisal rights by no more than 5% of PharmAthene’s stockholders; (vi) the amendment of PharmAthene’s Bylaws to limit the ability to remove Clifford Stocks as described above; (vii) all $8,000,000 of capital committed to Theraclone pursuant to its Series B-1 Preferred Stock and Warrant Purchase and Exchange Agreement shall have been delivered to Theraclone and (viii) other customary closing conditions.

Concurrently and in connection with the execution of the Merger Agreement, certain of PharmAthene’s stockholders, who beneficially own approximately 7.5% of the outstanding shares of PharmAthene common stock, entered into a voting agreement with Theraclone (the “PharmAthene Voting Agreement”), pursuant to which each stockholder agreed to vote its shares of PharmAthene common stock in furtherance of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and against any amendment of PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws or any other proposal or transaction, the effect of which amendment or other proposal is to delay, impair, prevent or nullify the Merger or the transaction contemplated by the Merger Agreement.

In addition, certain of Theraclone’s stockholders, who in the aggregate held approximately 75% of the outstanding shares of Theraclone capital stock as of July 31, 2013, entered into a voting agreement with PharmAthene (the “Theraclone Voting Agreement”), pursuant to which each stockholder agreed to vote its shares of Theraclone capital stock (i) in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and any actions required in furtherance thereof, (ii) in favor of the conversion of all outstanding shares of Theraclone preferred stock into Theraclone common stock on a 1:1 basis (as of immediately prior to the Effective Time and

F-41


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2013

Note 7 — Subsequent Events  – (continued)

contingent upon the Merger occurring) pursuant to Theraclone’s restated Certificate of Incorporation, (iii) against any other proposal or transaction involving Theraclone, the effect of which amendment or other proposal or transaction would be to delay, impair, prevent or nullify the Merger or the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, (iv) against any amendment of Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws that changes in any manner the voting rights of any capital stock of Theraclone (other than the conversion of Theraclone preferred stock into Theraclone common stock), and (v) against any other action or agreement that would result in a breach in any material respect of any covenant, representation or warranty of the Merger Agreement.

Both the PharmAthene Voting Agreement and the Theraclone Voting Agreement will terminate upon, among other things, the earlier of the Effective Time or termination of the Merger Agreement.

Concurrently and in connection with the execution of the Merger Agreement, the directors of Theraclone and their affiliates, as well as certain holders of 5% or more of Theraclone’s capital stock, who in the aggregate held approximately 75% of the outstanding shares of Theraclone capital stock as of July 31, 2013, entered into post-closing lock-up agreements with PharmAthene (the “Post-Closing Lock-up Agreements”). Pursuant to these agreements, each such stockholder will be subject to lock-up restrictions on the sale of PharmAthene common stock acquired in the Merger, pursuant to which 33% of the shares obtained in the Merger may be sold six months after the completion of the Merger, 66% may be sold nine months after the completion of the Merger, and 100% may be sold after the first anniversary of the date of completion of the Merger.

Each of PharmAthene and Theraclone have made customary representations, warranties and covenants in the Merger Agreement, including among others, covenants that (i) each party will conduct its business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice during the interim period between execution of the Merger Agreement and completion of the Merger; (ii) each party will not engage in certain kinds of transactions or take certain actions during such period (including, but not limited to, the issuance and sale of its securities and the incurrence of debt, with certain exceptions); (iii) Theraclone will solicit approval by its stockholders of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and the board of directors of Theraclone will recommend that its stockholders adopt and approve the Merger Agreement, subject to certain exceptions; and (iv) PharmAthene will convene and hold a meeting of its stockholders for the purpose of considering the approval of the issuance of shares of PharmAthene common stock in connection with the Merger, the election of the PharmAthene and Theraclone board designees and the authorization of additional shares of common stock and the board of directors of PharmAthene will recommend that its stockholders adopt and approve such proposals, subject to certain exceptions. PharmAthene also has agreed not to solicit proposals relating to alternative business combination transactions or enter into discussions or an agreement concerning any proposals for alternative business combination transactions, subject to exceptions in the event of its receipt of a “superior proposal,” as defined in the Merger Agreement. All representations and warranties of Theraclone (but not PharmAthene) included in the Merger Agreement will survive the completion of the Merger and remain in full force and effect until nine months after the closing date.

The Merger Agreement contains termination rights in favor of each of PharmAthene and Theraclone in certain circumstances. If PharmAthene terminates the Merger Agreement pursuant to its superior proposal termination right, it is obligated to pay to Theraclone a break-up fee of $3,500,000. If the PharmAthene board of directors changes its voting recommendations to PharmAthene stockholders as a result of a Transaction Event and Theraclone terminates as a result of such change in recommendation, or if PharmAthene terminated the Merger Agreement as a result of a Transaction Event (as defined below), PharmAthene is obligated to pay Theraclone a break-up fee of $4,500,000. A “Transaction Event” is defined to occur if the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware renders a substantive decision on the merits in PharmAthene’s civil case against SIGA and within 20 business days thereafter the PharmAthene board of directors determines, in its reasonable discretion, that, as a result of such decision, it can no longer consider the Merger a merger of equals. In

F-42


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2013

Note 7 — Subsequent Events  – (continued)

addition, either party may terminate the Merger Agreement if (i) the Merger has not been completed by January 31, 2014 (the “Outside Termination Date”), provided that if the registration statement on Form S-4 is not declared effective by October 4, 2013, then either party is generally entitled to extend the Outside Termination Date by 60 days, or (ii) the PharmAthene stockholders fail to approve the issuance of shares in the Merger, the increase in authorized shares of common stock or the election of the PharmAthene or Theraclone board designees. If (a) the Merger Agreement is terminated because the Merger has not been completed prior to the Outside Termination Date, (b) a takeover approval was announced prior to the PharmAthene stockholder meeting with respect to the Merger and (c) within nine months after the date of the termination of the Merger Agreement, PharmAthene enters into an agreement or understanding with respect to any takeover proposal that is subsequently completed, then PharmAthene is obligated to pay to Theraclone a break-up fee of $3,500,000. In certain other circumstances, PharmAthene will be obligated to reimburse Theraclone for expenses incurred in connection with the Merger, not to exceed $1,000,000. The Merger Agreement contains certain indemnification provisions, which, among other things, provide that Theraclone stockholders are not obligated, absent fraud or willful misconduct, to indemnify PharmAthene and its affiliates unless and until the aggregate amount of indemnification claims brought against them by PharmAthene and its affiliates is at least $1,000,000. In addition, no Theraclone stockholder has an obligation, absent fraud or willful misconduct of Theraclone, to indemnify PharmAthene or its affiliates for an amount in excess of such Theraclone stockholder’s pro rata share of the Escrow Shares. The Merger Agreement furthermore appointed Steven Gillis, Ph.D. as the agent for and on behalf of the Theraclone stockholders with respect to the Merger Agreement and Escrow Agreement, as well as related matters.

Controlled Equity Offering Arrangements

Subsequent to June 30, 2013, we sold 1,105,837 shares of our common stock under the controlled equity offering arrangement, which resulted in net proceeds of approximately $1.7 million excluding the $0.5 million in proceeds from June sales that were not received until July (See Note 6). Aggregate gross proceeds of up to approximately $8.6 million remain available under the arrangement. However, under the terms of the Merger Agreement with Theraclone, we are currently prohibited from using the arrangement.

F-43


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Index to Theraclone Sciences, Inc. Financial Statements

 
Report of Independent Auditors     F-45  
Financial Statements
        
Balance Sheets     F-46  
Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss     F-47  
Statements of Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ Deficit     F-48  
Statements of Cash Flows     F-49  
Notes to Financial Statements     F-50  

F-44


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Report of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Theraclone Sciences, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Theraclone Sciences, Inc., which comprise the balance sheets as of December 31, 2011 and 2012, and the related statements of operations and comprehensive loss, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes to the financial statements.

Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free of material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor’s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Theraclone Sciences, Inc. at December 31, 2011 and 2012, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Seattle, Washington
September 6, 2013

F-45


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone Sciences, Inc.
 
Balance Sheets
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Amounts)

     
  December 31   June 30,
2013
     2011   2012
               (Unaudited)
Assets
                          
Current assets:
                          
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 15,799     $ 5,426     $ 7,215  
Accounts receivable     80       2,012       608  
Prepaid expenses     693       182       262  
Redeemable convertible preferred stock forward contract                 53  
Total current assets     16,572       7,620       8,138  
Property and equipment, net     1,902       1,355       1,267  
Prepaid debt issuance costs                 128  
Total assets   $ 18,474     $ 8,975     $ 9,533  
Liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock, and stockholders’ deficit
                          
Current liabilities:
                          
Accounts payable   $ 698     $ 721     $ 181  
Accrued liabilities     823       1,373       1,419  
Deferred revenue, current portion     9,970       4,203       916  
Notes payable, current portion     598       549       992  
Deferred rent, current portion     116              
Total current liabilities     12,205       6,846       3,508  
Deferred revenue, less current portion     1,544              
Notes payable, less current portion     506       263       2,473  
Deferred rent, less current portion           253       403  
Redeemable convertible preferred stock warrant liability     51       48       175  
Commitments and contingencies                  
Redeemable convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share; 37,765,145 shares authorized at June 30, 2013; 32,956,403, 32,956,403, and 34,706,934 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011 and 2012, and June 30, 2013, respectively; aggregate liquidation preference of $57,591, $60,410, and $64,531 at December 31, 2011 and 2012 and June 30, 2013, respectively     57,182       60,008       63,996  
Stockholders’ deficit:
                          
Common stock, $0.001 par value per share; 60,000,000 shares authorized at June 30, 2013; 1,346,898, 1,346,898 and 2,276,872 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011 and 2012 and June 30, 2013, respectively     1       1       2  
Additional paid-in capital                  
Accumulated deficit     (53,015 )      (58,444 )      (61,024 ) 
Total stockholders’ deficit     (53,014 )      (58,443 )      (61,022 ) 
Total liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock, and stockholders’ deficit   $ 18,474     $ 8,975     $ 9,533  

 
 
See accompanying notes.

F-46


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone Sciences, Inc.
 
Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
(In Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)

       
  Year Ended December 31   Six Months Ended June 30
     2011   2012   2012   2013
               (Unaudited)
Revenue   $ 8,384     $ 19,360     $ 4,167     $ 4,495  
Operating expenses:
                                   
Research and development     14,816       19,611       6,594       5,608  
General and administrative     1,827       2,461       1,100       1,390  
Total operating expenses     16,643       22,072       7,694       6,998  
Loss from operations     (8,259 )      (2,712 )      (3,527 )      (2,503 ) 
Other income (expense):
                                   
Change in fair value of financial instruments     4       3             228  
Interest income     1                    
Interest expense     (104 )      (69 )      (37 )      (107 ) 
Net loss     (8,358 )      (2,778 )      (3,564 )      (2,382 ) 
Comprehensive loss     (8,358 )      (2,778 )      (3,564 )      (2,382 ) 
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock     (2,381 )      (2,826 )      (1,417 )      (1,429 ) 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders   $ (10,739 )    $ (5,604 )    $ (4,981 )    $ (3,811 ) 
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders – basic and diluted   $ (8.07 )    $ (4.16 )    $ (3.70 )    $ (1.98 ) 
Weighted average common shares
outstanding – basic and diluted
    1,330,968       1,346,898       1,346,898       1,919,767  

 
 
See accompanying notes.

F-47


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone Sciences, Inc.
 
Statements of Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ Deficit
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Amounts)

                         
  Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock       Additional Paid-In
Capital
  Deficit
Accumulated
  Total
Stockholders’
Deficit
     Series A   Series A-1   Series B   Series B-1   Common Stock
     Shares   Amount   Shares   Amount   Shares   Amount   Shares   Amount   Shares   Amount
Balances, December 31, 2010     4,900,000     $ 6,482                   20,333,334     $ 36,734                   1,289,687     $ 1     $     $ (42,442 )    $ (42,441 ) 
Stock options exercised for cash                                                     57,211             11             11  
Issuance of Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock at $1.50 per share net of issuance costs                             7,723,069       11,585                               (33 )            (33 ) 
Stock-based compensation                                                                 188             188  
Accretion of Series A and B redeemable convertible preferred stock           303                         2,078                               (166 )      (2,215 )      (2,381 ) 
Net loss                                                                       (8,358 )      (8,358 ) 
Balances, December 31, 2011     4,900,000       6,785                   28,056,403       50,397                   1,346,898       1             (53,015 )      (53,014 ) 
Issuance costs of Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock at $1.50 per share                                                                 (13 )            (13 ) 
Stock-based compensation                                                                 188             188  
Accretion of Series A and B redeemable convertible preferred stock           296                         2,530                               (175 )      (2,651 )      (2,826 ) 
Net loss                                                                       (2,778 )      (2,778 ) 
Balances, December 31, 2012     4,900,000       7,081                   28,056,403       52,927                   1,346,898       1             (58,444 )      (58,443 ) 
Stock options exercised for cash (unaudited)                                                     13,845             3             3  
Conversion in connection with Series B-1 agreement
(unaudited)
    (4,900,000 )      (7,081 )      4,765,145       6,946       (28,056,403 )      (52,927 )      27,275,122       51,755       916,129       1       1,306             1,307  
Issuance of Series B-1 redeemable convertible preferred stock at $1.50 per share net of forward contract liability of $134 (unaudited)                                         2,666,667       3,866                   (65 )            (65 ) 
Issuance of series B-1 redeemable convertible preferred stock warrants in connection with debt agreement and Series B-1 issuance (unaudited)                                                                 (114 )            (114 ) 
Stock-based compensation (unaudited)                                                                 101             101  
Accretion of Series A-1 and B-1 redeemable convertible preferred stock (unaudited)                          146                            1,283                   (1,231 )      (198 )      (1,429 ) 
Net loss (unaudited)                                                                       (2,382 )      (2,382 ) 
Balances, June 30, 2013 (unaudited)         $       4,765,145     $ 7,092           $       29,941,789     $ 56,904       2,276,872     $ 2     $     $ (61,024 )    $ (61,022 ) 

 
 
See accompanying notes.

F-48


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone Sciences, Inc.
 
Statements of Cash Flows
(In Thousands)

       
  Year Ended December 31   Six Months Ended June 30
     2011   2012   2012   2013
               (Unaudited)
Operating activities
                                   
Net loss   $ (8,358 )    $ (2,778 )    $ (3,564 )    $ (2,382 ) 
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
                                   
Amortization of debt discount     23       13       3       36  
Depreciation and amortization     948       836       476       289  
Stock-based compensation     188       188       110       101  
Change in fair value of financial instruments     (4 )      (3 )            (228 ) 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
                                   
Accounts receivable     4,040       (1,932 )      25       1,404  
Prepaid expenses     (485 )      511       (1,899 )      (80 ) 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities     308       573       (480 )      (494 ) 
Deferred revenue     (500 )      (7,311 )      (1,918 )      (3,287 ) 
Deferred rent     (178 )      137       179       150  
Net cash used in operating activities     (4,018 )      (9,766 )      (7,068 )      (4,491 ) 
Investing activities
                                   
Purchases of property and equipment     (1,167 )      (289 )      (130 )      (201 ) 
Net cash used in investing activities     (1,167 )      (289 )      (130 )      (201 ) 
Financing activities
                                   
Proceeds from note payable net of issuance costs     1,141       382       382       2,818  
Proceeds from issuance of common stock     11                   3  
Proceeds from issuance of redeemable convertible preferred stock net of issuance costs     11,552       (13 )            3,935  
Principal payments on notes payable     (866 )      (687 )      (376 )      (275 ) 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities     11,838       (318 )      6       6,481  
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents     6,653       (10,373 )      (7,192 )      1,789  
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year     9,146       15,799       15,799       5,426  
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period   $ 15,799     $ 5,426     $ 8,607     $ 7,215  
Supplemental disclosures
                                   
Cash paid for interest   $ 88     $ 62     $ 34     $ 68  
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock   $ 2,381     $ 2,826     $ 1,417     $ 1,429  

 
 
See accompanying notes.

F-49


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone Sciences, Inc.
 
Notes to Financial Statements

(Information as of June 30, 2013
and for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013 is unaudited)

1. Description of Business

Theraclone Sciences, Inc. (the Company) is a biopharmaceutical company focused on the discovery and development of novel, monoclonal antibody therapeutics for diseases that are devastating for patients and their families and which are a significant threat to human health. Theraclone leverages its proprietary antibody discovery technology, I-STAR (In-Situ Therapeutic Antibody Rescue), to rapidly identify rare human antibodies that may be developed into antibody product candidates that are potentially safer and more effective than current therapies. The Company has two infectious disease product candidates in clinical development: TCN-032, for the treatment of patients hospitalized with serious influenza, has completed a Phase 2a trial; and TCN-202, for the treatment and prevention of CMV infections is currently being evaluated in a Phase 2a trial in solid organ transplant patients.

The Company’s business involves inherent risks. These risks include, among others, dependence on key personnel, patentability of the Company’s products and processes, and clinical efficacy of the Company’s products under development. Any of the technologies covering the Company’s existing products under development could become obsolete or diminished in value by discoveries and developments at other organizations.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

Unaudited Interim Financial Information

The accompanying balance sheet as of June 30, 2013, the statements of operations and comprehensive loss and the statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013 and the statement of redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders’ deficit for the six months ended June 30, 2013 are unaudited. The unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual financial statements and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position as of June 30, 2013 and results of operations and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013. The financial data and other information disclosed in these notes to financial statements related to the six-month periods are unaudited. The results of the six months ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2013 or for any other interim period or for any other future year.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a purchased maturity of three months or less to be cash and cash equivalents. The Company’s cash equivalents consist principally of money market securities. Cash and cash equivalents of $63,000 are used as security for a standby letter of credit with a financial institution.

Accounts Receivable

The Company records accounts receivable for amounts due from collaborative partners for research and development services rendered. Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amounts and do not bear interest. Amounts collected from accounts receivable are included in net cash provided by operating activities in the statements of cash flows. Historically, no amounts have been written off, and an allowance for doubtful accounts is not deemed necessary.

F-50


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone Sciences, Inc.
 
Notes to Financial Statements

2. Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company is exposed to credit risk from its deposits of cash and cash equivalents in excess of amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Company has not experienced any losses on its deposits of cash and cash equivalents since inception.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, and deferred revenue approximate their fair values due to the short-term nature of those amounts. The carrying amount approximated the fair value of the Company’s notes payable at December 31, 2011, 2012 and June 30, 2013, as estimated using current market interest rates for companies with similar credit and risk profiles.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the depreciable assets, ranging from three to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the applicable remaining lease term or the estimated useful life of the related asset. Upon retirement or sale, the cost of assets disposed of and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in the statements of operations in the year of disposition. Additions and improvements that increase the value or extend the life of an asset are capitalized. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company recognizes impairment losses on long-lived assets when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying values. The Company has not experienced any impairment losses on its long-lived assets since inception.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized when there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists, service has been provided, the price is fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured.

Multiple Element Arrangements

Theraclone’s collaborative agreements with Pfizer, Zenyaku Kogyo and the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (“IAVI”) are multiple element arrangements that must be analyzed to identify the deliverables included in the agreements to determine if the deliverables qualify as separate units of accounting. The terms of the agreements may include nonrefundable license fees, funding of research and development activities and payments based upon the achievement of clinical or revenue milestones and royalties. Deliverables are considered a separate unit of accounting when all of the following criteria are met: (i) the delivered item has value to the customer on a standalone basis and (ii) if the arrangement includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item, the delivery or performance of the undelivered item is considered probable and substantially in Theraclone’s control. There are no rights of return in Theraclone’s collaborative agreements. Multiple contracts with a single party are evaluated as one arrangement if the contracts were entered into in contemplation of each other.

Theraclone’s collaborative agreements with multiple elements do not meet the criteria for separate units of accounting and therefore are treated as combined units of accounting to determine appropriate recognition of revenue. For combined units of accounting, the revenue is generally recognized in the same manner as the final deliverable. Revenue is recognized in a manner consistent with the nature of the agreements, which generally is based on a proportional performance methodology, over the estimated term of the research and

F-51


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone Sciences, Inc.
 
Notes to Financial Statements

2. Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

development service period. In certain circumstances revenue may be recognized on a straight-line basis over the estimated service period or immediately if there is no continuing obligation for the specific deliverable. The estimated term of the research and development service period is reviewed and adjusted based on the status of the project against the estimated timeline as additional information becomes available. Payments received in advance of work performed are recorded as deferred revenue and recognized when earned.

Substantive Milestone Payments

Theraclone’s collaboration agreements with Pfizer and Zenyaku Kogyo provide for substantive milestones. A milestone is defined as an event that meets the following conditions: (i) there is substantive uncertainty on the date the arrangement is entered into about whether the event will be achieved; (ii) achievement of the event is based in whole, or in part, on either Theraclone’s performance or a specific outcome resulting from Theraclone’s performance; and (iii) achievement of the event results in additional payment due to Theraclone. For a milestone to be considered substantive, the payment associated with its achievement must have all of the following characteristics: (i) relate solely to Theraclone’s past performance; (ii) be reasonable, relative to all of the deliverables and payment terms in the arrangement; and (iii) be commensurate with either Theraclone’s effort required to achieve the milestone or the enhanced value of the delivered item(s) as a result of the milestone achievement.

Substantive milestone payments are recognized upon achievement of the milestone only if all of the previous conditions are met and the milestone payments are nonrefundable. Determination as to whether a payment meets the aforementioned conditions involves management’s judgment. Theraclone has evaluated the nature of its arrangements and has elected to make a policy election to apply the milestone method where appropriate for its arrangements.

If any of the foregoing conditions are not met, the resulting payment would not be considered a substantive milestone, and therefore, the resulting payment would be determined to be part of the allocable arrangement consideration and would be recognized as revenue as such performance obligations are performed under either the proportional performance or time-based methods, as applicable, and in accordance with the policies as described above.

Research and Development

Research and development costs consist primarily of salaries and benefits, occupancy, materials and supplies, contracted research, consulting arrangements, and other expenses incurred to sustain the Company’s research and development programs. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

Patent Costs

Costs related to filing and pursuing patent applications are expensed as incurred, as recoverability of such expenditures is uncertain. These patent-related legal costs are reported as a component of general and administrative expenses.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method. Under the liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and federal income tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the tax rates that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax asset will not be realized.

F-52


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone Sciences, Inc.
 
Notes to Financial Statements

2. Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

The Company recognizes the financial statement effects of a tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the tax authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefit is measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company does not believe any uncertain tax positions currently pending will have a material adverse effect on its financial statements nor does the Company expect any material change in its position in the next 12 months. Penalties and interest, of which there are none, would be reflected in income tax expense.

Comprehensive Loss

Comprehensive loss consists of net loss and other gains and losses affecting stockholders’ deficit that under GAAP are excluded from net loss. The Company has no items of other comprehensive loss; as such, net loss equals comprehensive loss.

Net Loss Per Share

Basic net loss per share is calculated by dividing the net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Because the Company has reported a net loss for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 and for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013, and because potentially dilutive securities were anti-dilutive, diluted net loss per share is the same as basic net loss per share. The Company has excluded all outstanding common stock options and warrants and convertible preferred stock from the calculation of diluted net loss per share applicable to common stockholders because all such securities are anti-dilutive to the computation of net loss per share.

Historical outstanding dilutive securities not included in diluted loss per common share calculation are as follows:

       
  Year Ended December 31   Six Months Ended June 30
     2011   2012   2012   2013
               (unaudited)
Redeemable convertible preferred stock     32,956,403       32,956,403       32,956,403       34,706,934  
Forward contract to purchase preferred stock                       2,666,667  
Outstanding options to purchase common stock     7,970,772       8,241,278       8,125,894       8,772,422  
Warrants to purchase common stock     4,832,554       4,832,554       4,832,554       4,832,554  
Warrants to purchase preferred stock     53,334       53,334       53,334       307,473  
Total     45,813,063       46,083,569       45,968,185       51,286,050  

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company’s stock-based compensation costs are based upon the grant date fair value of options estimated using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model. This model utilizes as inputs the estimated fair value of the underlying common stock at the measurement date, the estimated term of the stock options, risk-free interest rates, expected dividends, and the expected volatility of the Company’s common stock.

The Company recognizes compensation expense for options granted to nonemployees by remeasuring such stock options to the current fair value at each reporting date until the performance date has been reached.

Accretion of Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock

Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock includes the accretion of the value of unpaid dividends into the carrying value of redeemable convertible preferred stock. Issuance costs that are material are amortized on a straight line basis over the period ending on the date when the preferred stock is first redeemable.

Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability

The Company accounts for convertible preferred stock warrants as liabilities that are remeasured at fair value at each reporting date. Changes in fair value are recorded as a component of other income (expense).

F-53


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone Sciences, Inc.
 
Notes to Financial Statements

2. Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock Forward Contract (unaudited)

In connection with the first closing of Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock (Series B-1) and Warrant Purchase and Exchange Agreement (Series B-1 Agreement) in March 2013, the holders received the right to participate in the second closing (the Forward Contract). The Forward Contract was recorded as a liability, at the estimated fair value of the obligation in March 2013 and adjusted to fair value at June 30, 2013. The change in fair value of the Forward Contract for the three-months ended June 30, 2013 resulted in an asset as of June 30, 2013 as a result of the decrease in the estimated fair value of the Company’s Series B-1 stock at June 30, 2013. The $187,000 change in fair value is recorded as other expense (income) in the statements of operations. The Forward Contract was outstanding and valued at $53,000 as of June 30, 2013, and was settled in August 2013. The following summarizes the terms of the Forward Contract and the impact on the accompanying financial statements as of the period through June 30, 2013:

 
Date of issuance     March 2013  
Settlement date     August 2013  
Number of shares originally purchased     2,666,667  
Additional number of shares that can be purchased     2,666,667  
Price at which the additional shares can be purchased   $ 1.50  
Estimated fair value of the Forward Contract at:
        
Date of Issuance   $ (134,000 ) 
June 30, 2013   $ 53,000  
Change in fair value included in other expense for the
six months ended June 30, 2013
  $ 187,000  

Fair Value Measurements

The Company defines fair value as the estimated price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The hierarchy of fair value measurements is described below:

Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets.

Level 2 — Inputs, other than quoted prices, that are either directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability.

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that reflect the Company’s best estimate of what market participants would use in the pricing of an asset or liability at the measurement date. Consideration is given to the risk inherent in the valuation technique and in the inputs to the model.

F-54


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone Sciences, Inc.
 
Notes to Financial Statements

2. Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

The following schedule presents assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis based on the nature of significant inputs (in thousands):

     
  Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2013, Using
     (unaudited)
     Quoted Prices
in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Money market funds   $ 7,215     $     $  
Redeemable convertible preferred stock warrant liability               $ 175  
Redeemable convertible preferred stock forward contract               $ 53  

     
  Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012, Using
     Quoted Prices
in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Money market funds   $ 5,426     $     $  
Redeemable convertible preferred stock warrant liability                 48  

     
  Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011, Using
     Quoted Prices
in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Money market funds   $ 15,583     $     $  
Redeemable convertible preferred stock warrant liability                 51  

The Company estimated the fair value of its convertible preferred stock warrant liability using a Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model and the following assumptions as of December 31, 2011 and 2012: volatility of 65%, expected life of six and five years, estimated fair value of Series B convertible preferred stock of $1.50 per share, no dividends, and a risk-free interest rate of 2% and 1%, respectively.

Beginning in 2013 the Company estimated the fair value of its preferred stock warrant liability on a marketable minority basis using the Option Pricing Model (OPM) using the following assumptions as of June 30, 2013: volatility of 55%, expected life of 0.92 years, estimated fair value of Series B convertible preferred stock of $1.48 per share, no dividends, and a risk-free interest rate of 0.13%.

The Company estimated the fair value of its preferred stock forward contract using an OPM that employed the following assumptions as of June 30, 2013: volatility of 55%, expected life of 0.92 years, a 6% annual dividend, and a risk-free interest rate of 0.13%. The difference between the concluded fair value of the Series B shares at $1.48 and the future obligation of $1.50 represents a liability to the investors and is thus an asset of Theraclone. To calculate the present value of this asset, the $.02 per share difference was discounted to a present value employing the weighted average cost of capital of Theraclone of 24%.

Expected volatility and expected life are unobservable inputs to the estimated fair value of its preferred stock warrant liability that are inter-related to the market value or price of the Company’s preferred stock, since the calculation for volatility is based on the prices of a composite of similar publicly traded companies. However, even a significant change in expected volatility and/or expected life would not have a material effect on the estimated value of the preferred stock warrant liability as the accruing dividend results in the allocation of the change in value to the preferred stock and not the warrant liability.

F-55


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone Sciences, Inc.
 
Notes to Financial Statements

2. Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

Expected volatility is an unobservable input to the estimated fair value of its Forward Contract that is inter-related to the market value or price of the Company’s preferred stock, since the calculation for volatility is based on the prices of a composite of similar publicly traded companies. If volatility were to change by approximately 60%, the value of the Forward Contract would change by approximately $150,000.

The reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the liability (asset) measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during 2011, 2012 and the six months ended June 30, 2013, is presented below (in thousands):

   
  Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability
  Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock Forward Contract
Beginning balance, January 1, 2011   $ 32     $  
Change in fair value     (4 )       
Issuances     23        
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3            
Ending balance, December 31, 2011     51        
Change in fair value     (3 )       
Issuances            
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3            
Ending balance, December 31, 2012     48        
Change in fair value (unaudited)     (41 )      (187 ) 
Issuances (unaudited)     168       134  
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 (unaudited)            
Ending balance, June 30, 2013 (unaudited)   $ 175     $ (53 ) 

3. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consists of the following at (in thousands):

       
  Estimated Useful Lives (Years)   December 31   June 30,
2013
     2011   2012
                    (unaudited)
Laboratory equipment     5     $ 4,972     $ 5,201     $ 5,396  
Leasehold improvements     1 to 5       365       396       396  
Computer and office equipment     3 to 5       230       259       265  
                5,567       5,856       6,057  
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization           (3,665 )      (4,501 )      (4,790 ) 
           $ 1,902     $ 1,355     $ 1,267  

Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 and for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013 totaled approximately $948,000, $836,000, $476,000 and $289,000, respectively.

4. Notes Payable

Equipment Financing Agreement

On December 27, 2007, the Company entered into a Master Security Agreement with a finance company under which the Company could borrow up to $5,000,000 for equipment purchases through September 2008. The first such borrowing occurred on December 27, 2007, upon execution of a promissory note in the amount of $1,276,000. The note bears interest at the rate of 10.64% per annum and had a term of four years. During

F-56


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone Sciences, Inc.
 
Notes to Financial Statements

4. Notes Payable  – (continued)

2008, the Company entered into two additional promissory notes under the Master Security Agreement for proceeds of $804,000 and $411,000 with interest rates of 10.47% and 14.12%, respectively. All of the promissory notes were paid in full as of December 31, 2012.

In connection with the Master Security Agreement, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 33,334 shares of Series B convertible preferred stock at an exercise price of $1.50 per share to the lender. The amount of net proceeds allocated to the warrant, based on its estimated fair value of $42,000, was recorded as a debt discount and was amortized as interest expense over the term of the outstanding loan. The debt discount balance was fully expensed in 2011.

Loan and Security Agreement

On May 19, 2011, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with a financial institution under which the Company could borrow up to $1,500,000 for equipment purchases through May 2012. The first advance under the Loan and Security Agreement occurred on May 19, 2011, for $763,000 and a second advance occurred on September 1, 2011, for $355,000. On May 2, 2012, the Company borrowed the remaining $382,000 under the Loan and Security Agreement. These advances have terms of 36, 30, and 30 months, respectively, and bear interest at the rate of 5.5% per annum. All of the advances under the Loan and Security Agreement are secured by the laboratory and office equipment purchased with the proceeds of the notes.

In connection with the Loan and Security Agreement, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 20,000 shares of Series B convertible preferred stock at an exercise price of $1.50 per share to the lender. The amount of net proceeds allocated to the warrant, based on its estimated fair value of $23,000, was recorded as a debt discount and will be amortized as interest expense over the term of the outstanding loan. The remaining debt discount balance was $18,500 as of December 31, 2012.

Credit and Security Agreement

On March 11, 2013, the Company entered into a Credit and Security Agreement with a financial institution whereby the Company can borrow up to $6 million for working capital purposes under the credit facility. The Company borrowed and received $3 million under the Credit and Security Agreement in March 2013, and borrowed the remaining $3 million in August 2013. The credit facility has a term of 45 months and bears interest at a rate of 7% and an interest-only period of nine months from initiation of the agreement. The Credit and Security Agreement is secured by the Company’s assets not already included as collateral under its May 2011 Loan and Security Agreement. Also, the Credit and Security Agreement includes certain covenants, which the Company is in compliance with.

In connection with the Credit and Security Agreement, the Company issued warrants to purchase 180,000 shares of Series B-1 convertible preferred stock at an exercise price of $1.50 per share to the lender. The amount of net proceeds allocated to the warrant, based on its estimated fair value of $54,000, was recorded as a debt discount and will be amortized as interest expense over the term of the outstanding loan.

Annual required principal payments on notes payable as of December 31, 2012, are as follows (in thousands):

 
2013   $ 549  
2014     282  
2015      
     $ 831  

F-57


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone Sciences, Inc.
 
Notes to Financial Statements

5. Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock

The following is a summary of the rights, preferences and terms of the Company’s outstanding series of Preferred Stock (in thousands, except share and per share data):

         
Series   Original Issuance   Liquidation Price
Per Share
  Shares Outstanding at December 31, 2011   Shares Outstanding at December 31, 2012   Shares Outstanding at June 30,
2013
             (unaudited)
Series A     2004 - 2007     $ 1.00       4,900,000       4,900,000        
Series B     2011     $ 1.50       28,056,403       28,056,403        
Series A-1     2013     $ 1.00                   4,765,145  
Series B-1     2013     $ 1.50                   29,941,789  
Total                 32,956,403       32,956,403       34,706,934  

Series B-1 Issuance

In March 2013, the Company entered into the Series B-1 Agreement with current stockholders. Under the Series B-1 Agreement, the Company sold an additional 5,333,334 shares of Series B-1 preferred convertible stock at a price of $1.50 per share in two closings. The first closing for 2,666,667 shares occurred in March 2013 and the second closing for 2,666,667 shares occurred in August 2013. In connection with the transaction, existing Series A and B convertible preferred stock was converted into shares of Series A-1 and B-1, respectively and 916,129 shares of Series A and B convertible preferred stock did not convert into Series A-1 or B-1, and were converted to an equal number of shares of common stock. The Company received net proceeds of $3,935,000, net of issuance costs of $65,000, from the first closing and approximately $4,000,000 from the second closing.

Certain investors who participated beyond their pro rata share, received one Series B-1 warrant for each share of Series B-1 stock purchased above their pro rata amount. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.01 per share. These warrants are exercisable at any time before their expiration in March 2020.

The Series A-1 and B-1 convertible preferred stock has conversion, dividend, voting, liquidation and redemption rights identical to those of the Series A and B preferred convertible preferred stock.

The significant terms of the Series A-1 and B-1 convertible preferred stock, which are consistent with those of the Series A and B convertible preferred stock, are described below.

Conversion

Each share of Series A and Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock (the preferred stock) is convertible into common stock: (i) at the option of the holder or (ii) the closing of an initial public offering of the Company’s common stock at a price not less than $5.00 per share and having gross proceeds of not less than $50,000,000. The conversion ratio is currently on a one-for-one basis and is subject to adjustment as provided by the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation. The holders of the Series A and Series B convertible preferred stock have broad-based antidilution protection provisions that could change the conversion ratio as a result of certain future financing transactions.

Dividends

Upon liquidation, holders of the Series A and Series B convertible preferred stock have preferential rights over common stockholders to cumulative, noncompounding annual dividends of $0.06 per share and $0.09 per share, respectively, whether or not such dividends are paid or declared. Dividends are payable when and if declared by the Board of Directors. No dividends have been declared or paid by the Company to date.

Voting

Preferred stockholders are entitled to the number of votes equal to the number of shares of common stock into which the preferred stock could be converted. In addition, the preferred stockholders have certain

F-58


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone Sciences, Inc.
 
Notes to Financial Statements

5. Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock  – (continued)

protective provisions whereby the Company is precluded from carrying out certain actions specified in the Certificate of Incorporation without the approval of a majority of the preferred stockholders.

Liquidation

Upon the occurrence of a liquidation event, the Series A and Series B preferred stockholders have preferential rights over common stockholders as to liquidation payments of their original issuance price of $1.00 per share and $1.50 per share, respectively, plus any unpaid dividends. Any additional distribution will be made to the holders of common stock and preferred stock on a pro rata as-converted basis.

In the event of a change of control whereby the Company: (i) is involved in any liquidation or winding up of the Company, whether voluntary or not; (ii) sells or disposes of substantially all of the assets of the Company; or (iii) effects any other transaction or series of related transactions in which more than 50% of the voting power of the Company is disposed of, then a “deemed liquidation” event occurs, whereby the preferred stockholders are entitled to receive their liquidation preferences described above.

Redemption

At any time on or after July 30, 2017, holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of the preferred stock as of that date may request the Company to redeem all (but not less than all) of the outstanding preferred stock, on a pari passu basis, at an amount equal to the liquidation value, including all unpaid dividends thereon. For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 and for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013 the Company has recorded accretion of the preferred stock dividends of approximately $2,346,000, $2,819,000, $1,409,000 and $1,429,000, respectively.

The redemption provisions described above require the Company to classify the preferred stock outside of permanent equity because the redemption of the preferred stock is outside of the control of the Company. The aggregate liquidation preference of the Series A and Series B convertible preferred stock is approximately $57,591,000 and $60,410,000 at December 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively and is $64,531,000 at June 30, 2013. The per-share cumulative dividends in arrears are approximately $0.36 to $0.48 for the Series A shares and $0.11 to $0.52 for the Series B shares as of December 31, 2012.

6. Common Stock

A summary of common stock reserved for future issuance, is as follows:

   
  December 31, 2012   June 30,
2013
          (unaudited)
Stock option plan     9,576,633       9,562,788  
Redeemable convertible preferred stock     32,956,403       34,706,934  
Redeemable convertible preferred stock warrants     53,334       307,473  
Forward contract to purchase redeemable convertible preferred stock           2,666,667  
Common stock warrants     4,832,554       4,832,554  
Total     47,418,924       52,076,416  

F-59


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone Sciences, Inc.
 
Notes to Financial Statements

7. Common and Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants

At June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012, the Company has the following outstanding common stock warrants:

     
  Warrants Outstanding   Exercise Price   Expiration Date
       3,866,666     $ 0.01       January 2015  
       725,000       0.10       June 2016  
       218,870       0.10       December 2016  
       22,018       1.00       March 2017  
       4,832,554              

At June 30, 2013, the Company has the following outstanding exercisable Series B-1 convertible preferred stock warrants (unaudited):

     
  Warrants Outstanding   Exercise Price   Expiration Date
       33,334     $ 1.50       December 2017  
       20,000       1.50       May 2021  
       180,000       1.50       March 2023  
       74,139       0.01       March 2020  
       307,473              

At December 31, 2012, the Company has the following outstanding exercisable Series B convertible preferred stock warrants:

     
  Warrants Outstanding   Exercise Price   Expiration Date
       33,334     $ 1.50       December 2017  
       20,000       1.50       May 2021  
       53,334              

8. Stock Option Plan

Under the Company’s 2004 Stock Option Plan (the Plan), the Board of Directors may grant incentive and nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, and other forms of stock-based compensation to employees, officers, directors, and consultants of the Company. The Company generally grants stock options with exercise prices equal to or greater than the value of common stock on the date of grant as determined by the Board of Directors. Options vest by the terms of the option agreement and, typically, have a term of ten years from the date of grant. Options generally vest over four years of continuous service. Options that expire, or otherwise terminate, revert to and become available for issuance under the Plan.

F-60


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone Sciences, Inc.
 
Notes to Financial Statements

8. Stock Option Plan  – (continued)

The following table summarizes employee activity under the Plan (dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):

         
    Outstanding
     Shares Available   Shares   Weighted-
Average Exercise
Price Per Share
  Weighted-
Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)
  Aggregate Intrinsic
Value
Balance at December 31, 2010     1,731,342       4,402,502     $ 0.23       7.07  
Additional shares authorized     3,500,000                                
Exercised           (57,211 )      0.19              $ 5  
Granted     (4,026,331 )      4,026,331       0.28                    
Forfeited/canceled     693,332       (693,332 )      0.26              
Balance at December 31, 2011     1,898,343       7,678,290       0.25       8.01           
Additional shares authorized                                    
Exercised                                    
Granted     (169,277 )      169,277       0.28                    
Forfeited/canceled     20,682       (20,682 )      0.22              
Balance at December 31, 2012     1,749,748       7,826,885       0.26       7.10     $ 245  
Exercisable, December 31, 2012              4,655,486     $ 0.24       5.85     $ 230  

A summary of exercise prices for options outstanding, is as follows:

 
Exercise Price   Options Outstanding on December 31, 2012
$0.10     751,854  
 0.13     326,263  
 0.17     286,917  
 0.24     732,784  
 0.28     4,190,045  
 0.31     1,539,022  
Total     7,826,885  

For purposes of measuring and recognizing compensation expense related to options granted to employees, certain assumptions were used to calculate fair value using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model as follows:

   
  Year Ending December 31
     2011   2012
Estimated per share fair value of common stock   $ 0.28     $ 0.28  
Risk-free interest rates     1.3 - 2.6 %      1.0 - 1.3 % 
Expected life (in years)     5.0 - 6.25         6.25  
Dividend yield     0.0 %      0.0 % 
Expected volatility     65 %      65 % 
Forfeiture rate     7 %      4.5 % 

The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, was $0.17 and $0.17 per share, respectively. The total fair value of shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, was $78,031 and $173,138, respectively.

F-61


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone Sciences, Inc.
 
Notes to Financial Statements

8. Stock Option Plan  – (continued)

The estimated per-share value of common stock was based on a valuation performed by the Company’s board of directors with the assistance of an independent third-party valuation specialist. The risk-free interest rates are based on the implied yield currently available in U.S. Treasury securities at maturity with an equivalent term. The expected term of the options granted was calculated using the simplified method, which determines expected life based upon the average midpoints of vesting tranches. Expected volatility is estimated using comparable public company stock volatility. Forfeiture rates were derived from historical employee termination behavior. The total compensation expense recognized for options granted to employees was approximately $185,000 during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012. Of these amounts, approximately $94,000 and $68,000 was charged to research and development expenses for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively, and approximately $91,000 and $117,000 was charged to general and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively. As of December 31, 2012, the total unrecognized compensation cost of approximately $434,000 will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the weighted-average remaining requisite service period of 2.8 years.

Stock-based compensation expense related to stock options granted to nonemployees is recognized as the underlying services are performed and the stock options are earned and vest. The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of approximately $3,000 during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, related to these options. Measurement of stock-based compensation to nonemployees is subject to periodic adjustment as the underlying equity instruments vest. No such options were granted in 2011 or 2012.

9. Income Taxes

The Company has a history of losses and therefore has no provision for income taxes. Deferred income taxes reflect the tax effect of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and the net temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amount used for income tax purposes, offset by a valuation allowance.

Significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):

   
  2011   2012
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):
                 
Net operating loss carryforwards   $ 10,279     $ 14,012  
Research and development credit carryforwards     709       709  
Share-based payments     97       119  
Deferred revenue     3,915       777  
Other     316       532  
Depreciation and amortization     (104 )      (54 ) 
Deferred tax assets, net     15,212       16,095  
Less valuation allowance     (15,212 )      (16,095 ) 
Net deferred tax assets   $     $  

As of December 31, 2012, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $41,212,000 that may be used to offset future taxable income. Unless previously utilized, the Company’s net operating loss carryforwards will expire beginning in 2024 through 2032. The Company’s ability to utilize its net operating loss carryforwards may be limited in the event of a change in ownership, as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The effect of changes in ownership, if any, has not yet been determined. Future changes in the Company’s ownership may further limit the use of such carryforward benefit.

As of December 31, 2012, the Company also had research and development credits of approximately $779,000 that may be used to offset future tax liabilities. Unless previously utilized, the Company’s research

F-62


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone Sciences, Inc.
 
Notes to Financial Statements

9. Income Taxes  – (continued)

and development credits will expire beginning in 2024 through 2032. The Company’s ability to utilize these credits may also be subject to limitations based on changes in ownership.

The Company does not have uncertain tax positions. As such, no tax contingencies are recorded or are expected to be recorded in the next 12 months. The Company recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. However, there are no material unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2011 and 2012. Furthermore, the Company does not anticipate any significant changes in its unrecognized tax benefits over the next 12 months. The Company only operates in the State of Washington and therefore is subject to tax only for US federal income tax purposes. Tax years from 2009 to 2012, are currently open for audit by federal income tax authorities. Years prior to 2009 are subject to adjustment to the extent those net operating losses are utilized on a future year’s tax return.

The Company has established a 100% valuation allowance due to the uncertainty of the Company’s ability to generate sufficient taxable income to realize the deferred tax assets. The Company’s valuation allowance increased approximately $2,700,000 and $883,000 in 2011 and 2012, respectively, primarily due to net operating losses incurred during these periods.

Deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2012, do not include research and development credits generated in 2012. The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 was signed into law on January 3, 2013, which retroactively extended the research and development credits back to January 1, 2012. Accounting guidance on income taxes requires that the effect of tax legislation be taken into account in the year in which the law was enacted. Therefore, the 2012 research and development credits were not recorded as deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2012, but will be recorded in 2013. At December 31, 2012, these research and development credits were approximately $141,000.

10. Employee Savings Plan

The Company has a 401(k) savings plan (the 401(k) Plan) for those employees who meet minimum eligibility requirements. Eligible employees may contribute up to 90% of their annual compensation to the 401(k) Plan, subject to Internal Revenue Service limitations. The Company may also, at its sole discretion, make contributions to the 401(k) Plan. To date, the Company has not made any contributions to the 401(k) Plan.

11. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company had a five-year lease with a related party that expired in July 2012, for office space. The Company recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease period. The Company has issued a standby letter of credit in the amount of $63,000 in connection with this lease. The standby letter of credit is secured by a certificate of deposit classified as cash and cash equivalents. The Company amended this lease in October 2011, to extend the base term for another six years, through June 2018.

Total rent expense was approximately $756,000 and $573,000 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively. No amounts were outstanding to the lessor as of December 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively.

F-63


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone Sciences, Inc.
 
Notes to Financial Statements

11. Commitments and Contingencies  – (continued)

Future minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2012, are as follows (in thousands):

 
2013   $ 596  
2014     681  
2015     701  
2016     722  
2017     890  
Thereafter     452  
Total minimum lease payments   $ 4,042  

12. Significant Agreements

International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI)

In February 2008, Theraclone commenced an anti-HIV antibody discovery program with IAVI. As a part of this program, Theraclone is utilizing its I-STAR technology to discover antibodies that neutralize the HIV virus. Under the terms of a collaboration agreement, IAVI retains the rights to develop HIV vaccines based on the antibodies and Theraclone retains the rights to develop therapeutics based on the antibodies. Together, Theraclone and IAVI have discovered a large panel of broadly neutralizing and highly potent anti-HIV monoclonal antibodies that recognize novel epitopes present in a broad range of virus in circulation. Theraclone’s intent is to identify a licensee for the therapeutic use of the monoclonal antibodies. To date, Theraclone has received from IAVI approximately $4.4 million in research payments. The term of the collaboration agreement continues, unless earlier terminated per the terms of the agreement, until all deliverables have been provided by Theraclone to IAVI. The collaboration agreement may be terminated by IAVI if it is not reasonably satisfied with Theraclone’s performance or if there are significant changes in the scientific staffing at Theraclone that IAVI believes may jeopardize the discovery program. Additionally, either party may terminate the collaboration agreement upon the other party’s uncured failure to comply with any material terms or conditions of the collaboration agreement.

Zenyaku Kogyo (ZK)

In March 2010, Theraclone entered into a strategic alliance with Zenyaku Kogyo, or Zenyaku, to develop anti-influenza antibody therapeutics. As part of the agreement with Theraclone, Zenyaku exercised its option for an exclusive license in the Japanese territory to Theraclone’s influenza monoclonal antibody program. The collaboration utilizes Theraclone’s I-STAR technology to discover broadly protective monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of pandemic influenza and severe seasonal influenza, including product candidate TCN-032. The agreement provides for royalty rates in the mid single digits to low double digits for potential future sales in Japan, clinical milestone payments of up to $18 million upon the achievement of certain development and regulatory milestones during the term of the agreement. Theraclone retains worldwide development and commercial rights outside of Japan. Zenyaku is eligible to receive a share of proceeds from Theraclone’s licensing of rights in certain Asian countries outside of Japan. The term of the agreement will continue on a country-by-country and product-by-product basis, unless earlier terminated per the terms of the agreement, until the earlier of the expiration, invalidation or unenforceability of the patents or pending patent applications covered by the agreement or ten years from the commercial launch of the applicable product. If Zenyaku Kogyo determines not to proceed with the products licensed under the agreement, then Zenyaku Kogyo may terminate the agreement upon thirty days prior written notice to Theraclone. Additionally, either party may terminate the agreement under certain other circumstances, including an uncured material breach of any material provision of the agreement and bankruptcy. Theraclone completed a substantial portion of the development activities in connection with the agreement during 2012, by completing the TCN-032 Phase 1 clinical trial and initiating and completing the majority of the subject enrollment portion of the Phase 2a trial. To date, Theraclone has received from Zenyaku an aggregate of approximately $21.7 million in fees, research

F-64


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone Sciences, Inc.
 
Notes to Financial Statements

12. Significant Agreements  – (continued)

funding payments and milestone payments in support of the influenza discovery and development program through the TCN-032 Phase 1 clinical study, and three equity investments totaling $2 million from Zenyaku.

The Company has identified the following deliverables under the collaboration agreement with ZK: i) performance under the option agreement, ii) the license to the Company’s technology, and iii) the obligation to provide research and development services during the term of the agreement. The license was not considered to have stand alone value due to the unique propriety research that the Company will provide to ZK over the term of the arrangement. As a consequence, the option fee, the license fee, the stock premium as well as amounts for research and development services will be aggregated and recognized as revenue based on proportional performance method over the expected performance period of the research activities under the agreement. At any point in time, amounts recognized as revenue are limited to amounts due and payable by ZK under the arrangement.

The Company has evaluated the milestone payment related to the ZK Agreement amounting to $3 million and concluded it represents consideration for substantive, at risk activities and therefore recognized it as revenue upon receipt in 2012. The milestone related to the development milestone for the first patient treated in a Phase II clinical trial. No development milestones were achieved for the period ending December 31, 2011. Revenues from ZK were $6.1 million and $11.4 million in 2011 and 2012, respectively.

Pfizer

In January 2011, Theraclone entered into a multi-year, exclusive discovery research partnership with Pfizer. The collaboration is based on use of Theraclone’s I-STAR technology to discover broadly protective monoclonal antibodies against up to four undisclosed targets in the areas of infectious disease and cancer. Pfizer is responsible for pre-clinical and clinical development of the antibodies under this collaboration. Pfizer will receive an exclusive worldwide license to any therapeutic antibodies discovered under the collaboration. Theraclone is eligible to receive royalties at rates in the mid to high single digits on net sales of any developed products and research funding and milestone payments upon the achievement of discovery, development, regulatory and commercialization milestones. These milestone payments are contingent upon the successful achievement of specified development activities such as clinical trial initiation or regulatory activities based upon Pfizer’s performance. As of June 30, 2013, Theraclone had received approximately $11.5 million in fees and milestone payments from Pfizer. The term of the agreement will continue on a country-by-country and product-by-product basis, unless earlier terminated per the terms of the agreement, until the earlier of the expiration, invalidation, revocation or unenforceability of the patents or pending patent applications covered by the agreement or ten years from the first commercial sale of the applicable product. Pfizer may terminate the agreement on a target-by-target or product-by-product and country-by-country basis for any reason or for no reason upon sixty days prior written notice to Theraclone or, upon written notice, in the event of Theraclone’s bankruptcy. Additionally, either party may terminate the agreement upon the other party’s uncured material breach of such party’s obligations under the agreement. Theraclone has completed work on the first infectious disease program, has nearly completed work on the initial cancer program and, in March of 2013, Pfizer terminated the second infectious disease program. Additional funding under this agreement depends on whether Pfizer decides to initiate another research program.

The Company has identified the following performance obligations under the license agreement with Pfizer: i) the license to the Company’s technology and ii) the obligation to provide research and development services during the term of the agreement. The Company determined that the license to the Company’s technology does not have standalone value to Pfizer due to the unique, proprietary research that the Company will provide to Pfizer over the research period. The Company is entitled to receive milestone payments upon the achievement of certain clinical, regulatory and commercial based events subsequent to the research and development service periods of the respective agreements. These milestone payments are contingent upon the successful achievement of specified development activities such as clinical trial initiation or regulatory

F-65


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone Sciences, Inc.
 
Notes to Financial Statements

12. Significant Agreements  – (continued)

activities based upon Pfizer’s performance. The contingent milestone payments and royalties related to the Pfizer agreement will be recognized as revenue when earned and payment has been received.

Amounts received by the Company from Pfizer for the upfront license fee, research and development funding, and non-substantive milestones are recognized as collaboration revenue based on proportional performance, as services are performed over the expected performance period of the agreement.

13. Subsequent Events

For the year ended December 31, 2012, management evaluated subsequent events through September 6, 2013, the date these financial statements were available for issue.

14. Merger

On August 1, 2013, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with PharmAthene, Inc., and Taurus Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of PharmAthene (“Merger Sub”), which provides for the merger of Merger Sub with and into the Company, with the Company surviving the merger and becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of PharmAthene. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement, PharmAthene will issue shares of its common stock to the Company’s stockholders based on an exchange ratio to be determined prior to closing of the transaction. Under the exchange ratio formula in the Merger Agreement, the Company’s former stockholders are expected to own approximately 50% of the combined company, and PharmAthene’s stockholders are expected to own approximately 50% of the combined company, each on a fully diluted basis (without regard to PharmAthene options and warrants having an exercise price greater than $2.50 per share). The transaction has been approved by the Board of Directors of both companies and is subject to customary closing conditions, including the approval of the stockholders of PharmAthene. The merger is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2013.

F-66


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ANNEX A

AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
 
among
 
PHARMATHENE, INC.,
 
TAURUS MERGER SUB, INC.,
 
THERACLONE SCIENCES, INC.,
 
and
 
STEVEN GILLIS, PH.D., AS SECURITYHOLDERS’ REPRESENTATIVE
 
Dated as of July 31, 2013

A-1


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
  Page
ARTICLE I THE MERGER     A-6  

Section 1.1

The Merger

    A-6  

Section 1.2

Closing

    A-6  

Section 1.3

Effective Time

    A-6  

Section 1.4

Effects of the Merger

    A-6  

Section 1.5

Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Surviving Subsidiary

    A-6  

Section 1.6

Directors

    A-6  

Section 1.7

Officers

    A-7  

Section 1.8

Tax Consequences

    A-7  
ARTICLE II CONVERSION OF SHARES; EXCHANGE OF CERTIFICATES     A-7  

Section 2.1

Effect of Merger on Capital Stock of Theraclone and Merger Sub

    A-7  

Section 2.2

Exchange of Certificates

    A-9  
ARTICLE III REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THERACLONE     A-11  

Section 3.1

Qualification, Organization, Subsidiaries, etc

    A-11  

Section 3.2

Capital Stock

    A-12  

Section 3.3

Corporate Authority; No Violation

    A-12  

Section 3.4

Financial Statements

    A-13  

Section 3.5

No Undisclosed Liabilities

    A-14  

Section 3.6

Compliance with Law; Permits

    A-14  

Section 3.7

Environmental Laws and Regulations

    A-15  

Section 3.8

Employee Benefit Plans

    A-15  

Section 3.9

Absence of Certain Changes or Events

    A-17  

Section 3.10

Investigations; Litigation

    A-17  

Section 3.11

Proxy Statement; Other Information

    A-17  

Section 3.12

Tax Matters

    A-17  

Section 3.13

Employee Relations Matters

    A-19  

Section 3.14

Intellectual Property

    A-20  

Section 3.15

Real Property

    A-21  

Section 3.16

Required Vote of Theraclone Stockholders

    A-22  

Section 3.17

Takeover Statutes

    A-22  

Section 3.18

Material Contracts

    A-22  

Section 3.19

Finders or Brokers

    A-24  

Section 3.20

Insurance

    A-24  

Section 3.21

Affiliate Transactions

    A-24  

Section 3.22

Food And Drug Administration Matters

    A-24  

Section 3.23

Government Contracts

    A-26  

Section 3.24

Subsidiaries

    A-28  

Section 3.25

Disclosure

    A-28  
ARTICLE IV REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PHARMATHENE AND
MERGER SUB
    A-28  

Section 4.1

Qualification; Organization, Subsidiaries, etc

    A-28  

Section 4.2

Corporate Authority; No Violation

    A-29  

Section 4.3

Capital Stock

    A-30  

Section 4.4

Reports and Financial Statements

    A-31  

Section 4.5

Internal Controls and Procedures

    A-32  

Section 4.6

No Undisclosed Liabilities

    A-32  

A-2


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
  Page

Section 4.7

Compliance with Law; Permits

    A-32  

Section 4.8

Environmental Laws and Regulations

    A-33  

Section 4.9

Employee Benefit Plans

    A-33  

Section 4.10

Absence of Certain Changes or Events

    A-35  

Section 4.11

Investigations; Litigation

    A-35  

Section 4.12

Proxy Statement; Other Information

    A-35  

Section 4.13

Tax Matters

    A-36  

Section 4.14

Employee Relations Matters

    A-37  

Section 4.15

Intellectual Property

    A-38  

Section 4.16

Real Property

    A-40  

Section 4.17

Takeover Statutes

    A-40  

Section 4.18

Material Contracts

    A-40  

Section 4.19

Insurance

    A-42  

Section 4.20

Affiliate Transactions

    A-42  

Section 4.21

Food And Drug Administration Matters

    A-42  

Section 4.22

Government Contracts

    A-44  

Section 4.23

Subsidiaries

    A-46  

Section 4.24

Vote of PharmAthene Stockholders

    A-47  

Section 4.25

Finders or Brokers

    A-47  

Section 4.26

Disclosure

    A-47  
ARTICLE V INDEMNIFICATION     A-47  

Section 5.1

Indemnification by Theraclone Stockholders

    A-47  

Section 5.2

No Indemnification by PharmAthene or the Surviving Subsidiary

    A-48  

Section 5.3

Indemnification Limitation — Survival

    A-48  

Section 5.4

Indemnification Limitation — Deductible and Cap

    A-48  

Section 5.5

Indemnity Escrow; Distribution from Indemnity Escrow

    A-48  

Section 5.6

Indemnification Procedures

    A-50  

Section 5.7

Securityholders’ Representative.

    A-52  

Section 5.8

Representations and Warranties

    A-53  

Section 5.9

Exclusive Remedy

    A-53  

Section 5.10

Subrogation

    A-53  

Section 5.11

Merger Consideration Adjustment

    A-53  
ARTICLE VI CERTAIN AGREEMENTS     A-53  

Section 6.1

Conduct of Business by Theraclone and by PharmAthene

    A-53  

Section 6.2

Investigation

    A-60  

Section 6.3

No Solicitation

    A-61  

Section 6.4

Filings; Other Actions

    A-63  

Section 6.5

Benefit Plans

    A-65  

Section 6.6

Reasonable Best Efforts

    A-66  

Section 6.7

Takeover Statute

    A-66  

Section 6.8

Public Announcements; Confidentiality

    A-66  

Section 6.9

Indemnification and Insurance

    A-67  

Section 6.10

Control of Operations

    A-68  

Section 6.11

No Other Representations or Warranties

    A-68  

Section 6.12

Stock Exchange Listing

    A-68  

Section 6.13

PharmAthene Board

    A-68  

Section 6.14

Treatment as Reorganization

    A-69  

A-3


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
  Page
ARTICLE VII CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER     A-69  

Section 7.1

Conditions to Each Party’s Obligation to Effect the Merger

    A-69  

Section 7.2

Conditions to Obligation of Theraclone to Effect the Merger

    A-70  

Section 7.3

Conditions to Obligation of PharmAthene to Effect the Merger

    A-70  
ARTICLE VIII TERMINATION     A-71  

Section 8.1

Termination and Abandonment

    A-71  

Section 8.2

Effect of Termination

    A-73  
ARTICLE IX MISCELLANEOUS     A-74  

Section 9.1

Expenses

    A-74  

Section 9.2

Counterparts; Effectiveness

    A-74  

Section 9.3

Governing Law

    A-74  

Section 9.4

Specific Performance; Jurisdiction; Enforcement

    A-74  

Section 9.5

WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL

    A-75  

Section 9.6

Notices

    A-75  

Section 9.7

Assignment; Binding Effect

    A-76  

Section 9.8

Severability

    A-76  

Section 9.9

Entire Agreement; No Third-Party Beneficiaries

    A-76  

Section 9.10

Amendments; Waivers

    A-76  

Section 9.11

Headings

    A-76  

Section 9.12

Interpretation

    A-76  

Section 9.13

Definitions

    A-77  

EXHIBITS AND ANNEXES

Exhibit 1 — Theraclone Sciences, Inc. Voting and Lock-Up Agreement
Exhibit 2 — PharmAthene, Inc. Voting and Lock-Up Agreement
Exhibit 3 — Form of Certificate of Incorporation of Merger Sub
Exhibit 4 — Form of Bylaws of Merger Sub
Exhibit 5 — Form of PharmAthene, Inc. Charter Amendment
Exhibit 6 — Form of Board Composition Agreement
Exhibit 7 — Post-Closing Lock-Up Agreement
Annex A — Approving Theraclone Sciences, Inc. Stockholders
Annex B — Approving PharmAthene, Inc. Stockholders

A-4


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

THIS AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER, dated as of July 31, 2013 (this “Agreement”), among PharmAthene, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“PharmAthene”), Taurus Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a direct, wholly owned Subsidiary of PharmAthene (“Merger Sub”), Theraclone Sciences, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Theraclone”), and Steven Gillis, Ph.D., solely in its capacity as the representative of the Theraclone Stockholders (the “Securityholders’ Representative”).

WHEREAS, pursuant to this Agreement, in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”), Merger Sub will be merged with and into Theraclone, with Theraclone as the surviving corporation (the “Merger”), and as a result of the Merger, Theraclone will become a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of PharmAthene;

WHEREAS, concurrently with the execution and delivery of this Agreement and as a condition to PharmAthene’s willingness to enter into this Agreement, the Theraclone Stockholders listed on Annex A (the “Approving Theraclone Stockholders”) have entered into a Voting and Lock-Up Agreement, dated as of the date of this Agreement, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 1 hereto (the “Theraclone Voting Agreement”), pursuant to which such Approving Theraclone Stockholders have, among other things, agreed to vote all of the stock of Theraclone owned by such Approving Theraclone Stockholder in favor of the adoption of the Theraclone Stockholder Approval Matters;

WHEREAS, concurrently with the execution and delivery of this Agreement and as a condition to PharmAthene’s willingness to enter into this Agreement, all of the Approving Theraclone Stockholders have entered into a Post-Closing Lock-Up Agreement, dated as of the date of this Agreement, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 7 hereto (the “Post-Closing Lock-Up Agreement”), pursuant to which such Approving Theraclone Stockholders have, among other things, agreed not to transfer any portion of the Merger Consideration to any third party for the periods set forth therein;

WHEREAS, concurrently with the execution and delivery of this Agreement and as a condition to Theraclone’s willingness to enter into this Agreement, those certain stockholders of PharmAthene listed on Annex B (the “Approving PharmAthene Stockholders”) have entered into a Voting and Lock-Up Agreement, dated as of the date of this Agreement, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 2 hereto (the “PharmAthene Voting Agreement”), pursuant to which such Approving PharmAthene Stockholders have, among other things, agreed to vote all of the stock of PharmAthene owned by such Approving PharmAthene Stockholders in favor of the adoption of the PharmAthene Stockholder Approval Matters;

WHEREAS, the board of directors of Theraclone (the “Theraclone Board of Directors”) has unanimously (i) determined that it is in the best interests of Theraclone and its stockholders, and declared it advisable, to enter into this Agreement, (ii) approved this Agreement and authorized the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, including the Merger and (iii) resolved to recommend its adoption by the stockholders of Theraclone;

WHEREAS, the board of directors of PharmAthene (the “PharmAthene Board of Directors”) has unanimously (i) determined that it is in the best interests of PharmAthene and its stockholders, and declared it advisable, to enter into this Agreement, (ii) approved this Agreement and authorized the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, including the Merger and (iii) resolved to recommend that the stockholders of PharmAthene approve the PharmAthene Stockholder Approval Matters;

WHEREAS, the board of directors of Merger Sub has unanimously (i) determined that it is in the best interests of Merger Sub and PharmAthene, as its sole stockholder, and declared it advisable, to enter into this Agreement, (ii) approved this Agreement and authorized the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, including the Merger and (iii) resolved to recommend that the sole stockholder of Merger Sub approve the Merger and adopt this Agreement; and

WHEREAS, PharmAthene, Merger Sub and Theraclone desire to make certain representations, warranties and agreements specified in this Agreement in connection with this Agreement.

A-5


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the representations, warranties and agreements contained in this Agreement, and intending to be legally bound hereby, PharmAthene, Merger Sub and Theraclone agree as follows:

ARTICLE I
 
THE MERGER

Section 1.1 The Merger.  At the Effective Time (as defined below), upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement, and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the DGCL, Merger Sub will be merged with and into Theraclone, whereupon the separate corporate existence of Merger Sub will cease, and Theraclone will continue as the surviving corporation of the Merger and as a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of PharmAthene. Theraclone in its capacity as the surviving corporation of the Merger is sometimes referred to herein as the “Surviving Subsidiary ..”

Section 1.2 Closing.  The closing of the Merger (the “Closing”) will take place remotely via the exchange of documents and signature pages on a date and time to be specified by the parties (the “Closing Date”), which shall be the second Business Day after the satisfaction or waiver (to the extent waiver is permitted by applicable Law) of the conditions set forth in ARTICLE VII (other than those conditions that by their nature are to be satisfied at the Closing, but subject to the satisfaction or waiver (if legally permissible) of those conditions) or at such other place, date and time as Theraclone and PharmAthene may agree in writing.

Section 1.3 Effective Time.  On the Closing Date, immediately after the Closing, the parties shall cause the Merger to be consummated by executing and filing a certificate of merger (the “Certificate of Merger”) with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware and making all other filings or recordings required under the DGCL in connection with the Merger. The Merger shall become effective at such time as the Certificate of Merger is duly filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, or at such later date as the parties shall agree and as shall be set forth in the Certificate of Merger (the time the Merger becomes effective is referred to herein as the “Effective Time”).

Section 1.4 Effects of the Merger.  The effects of the Merger will be as provided in this Agreement and in the applicable provisions of the DGCL. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, at the Effective Time, all the assets and property of every description, and every interest in the assets and property, wherever located, and the rights, privileges, immunities, powers, franchises and authority of Merger Sub shall vest in the Surviving Subsidiary, and all obligations of Merger Sub shall become the obligations of the Surviving Subsidiary, all as provided in the DGCL and the other applicable Laws of the State of Delaware. At and after the Effective Time, the officers and directors of the Surviving Subsidiary will be authorized to execute and deliver, in the name and on behalf of Merger Sub, any deeds, bills of sale, assignments or assurances and to take and do, in the name and on behalf of Merger Sub, any other actions and things to vest, perfect or confirm of record or otherwise in the Surviving Subsidiary any and all right, title and interest in, to and under any of the properties, assets or rights of Merger Sub.

Section 1.5 Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Surviving Subsidiary.

(a) At the Effective Time, the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Theraclone shall be so amended so as to read in its entirety as set forth Exhibit 3 annexed hereto, and, as so amended, shall be the certificate of incorporation of the Surviving Subsidiary until thereafter amended in accordance with the provisions thereof and this Agreement and applicable Law.

(b) At the Effective Time and without any further action on the part of Theraclone or Merger Sub, the bylaws of the Surviving Subsidiary shall be amended so as to read in its entirety as is set forth on Exhibit 4 annexed hereto, and, as so amended, shall be the bylaws of the Surviving Subsidiary until thereafter amended in accordance with the provisions thereof and this Agreement and applicable Law.

Section 1.6 Directors.  The directors of the Merger Sub immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be the initial directors of the Surviving Subsidiary and shall hold office until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified, or until their earlier death, resignation or removal.

A-6


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section 1.7 Officers.  The officers of Theraclone immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be the initial officers of the Surviving Subsidiary and shall hold office until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified, or until their earlier death, resignation or removal.

Section 1.8 Tax Consequences.  It is intended by the parties hereto that the Merger constitute a reorganization within the meaning of section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The parties hereto adopt this Agreement as a plan of reorganization within the meaning of Treasury Regulation sections 1.368-1(c) and 1.368-2(g).

ARTICLE II
 
CONVERSION OF SHARES; EXCHANGE OF CERTIFICATES

Section 2.1 Effect of Merger on Capital Stock of Theraclone and Merger Sub.  At the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of Theraclone, Merger Sub or the holders of any securities of Theraclone or Merger Sub:

(a) Conversion of Theraclone Common Shares.  Subject to Section 2.1(d), Section 2.1(e), Section 2.1(f), Section 2.1(g), Section 2.1(h), Section 2.2, and Article V, each common share, par value $0.001, of Theraclone (the “Theraclone Common Shares,” and each, a “Theraclone Common Share”) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time, shall, at the Effective Time, be converted into and shall thereafter represent the right to receive (the “Merger Consideration”) that number of shares of common stock, $.0001 par value per share, of PharmAthene (the “PharmAthene Stock”) equal to the quotient obtained from dividing the Fully Diluted Equity of PharmAthene immediately prior to the Effective Time by the Fully Diluted Equity of Theraclone immediately prior to the Effective Time (the “Exchange Ratio”), in each case upon surrender of the certificate(s) representing such Theraclone Common Shares as provided in this ARTICLE II, less a Pro Rata Share of the Escrow Shares, and all Theraclone Common Shares that have been converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration as provided in this Section 2.1 shall be automatically cancelled and shall cease to exist.

(b) Cancellation of Treasury Stock and PharmAthene and Merger Sub-Owned Shares.  Each Theraclone Common Share that is held by PharmAthene or any Subsidiary of PharmAthene immediately prior to the Effective Time or held by Theraclone (as treasury stock or otherwise) immediately prior to the Effective Time (the “Cancelled Shares”) shall, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of the holder thereof, be cancelled and retired and shall cease to exist, and no consideration shall be delivered in exchange therefor or in respect thereof.

(c) Conversion of Merger Sub Common Shares.  At the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of the holder thereof, each share of common stock, par value $0.0001, of Merger Sub issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be converted into and become one validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable share of common stock, par value $0.0001, of the Surviving Subsidiary, with the same rights, powers and privileges as the shares so converted and those shares of common stock of the Surviving Subsidiary shall constitute the only outstanding shares of capital stock of the Surviving Subsidiary. From and after the Effective Time, all certificates representing common shares of Merger Sub will for all purposes represent the number of common shares of the Surviving Subsidiary into which they were converted in accordance with the immediately preceding sentence.

(d) Escrow Shares.  At the Effective Time, PharmAthene shall withhold from the Merger Consideration the Escrow Shares, which shall be allocated among the Theraclone Stockholders in accordance with their Pro Rata Share. Any such Escrow Shares will be delivered by PharmAthene to the Escrow Agent, to be held pursuant to the terms of the Escrow Agreement in accordance with Section 5.5(a). The Escrow Shares shall be deposited, voted, transferred, and released in accordance with Article V hereof and the Escrow Agreement.

(e) Adjustments.  If at any time between the date of this Agreement and the Effective Time, any change in the outstanding shares of capital stock of Theraclone or PharmAthene shall occur as a result of any reclassification, recapitalization, share split (including a reverse share split) or combination, exchange or readjustment of shares, or any share dividend or share distribution with a record date during such

A-7


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

period (but not as a result of the exercise of any outstanding Theraclone Stock Option, Theraclone Warrant, PharmAthene capital stock-based award or PharmAthene capital stock options), the Exchange Ratio will be equitably adjusted to reflect such change.

(f) Dissenting Shares.

(i) Theraclone Common Shares that are issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time and which are held by holders who have not voted in favor of or consented to the Merger and who are entitled to demand and have properly demanded their rights to be paid the fair value of such Theraclone Common Shares in accordance with section 262 of the DGCL (the “Dissenting Shares”) shall not be canceled and converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration, and the holders thereof shall be entitled to only such rights as are granted by section 262 of the DGCL; provided, however, that if any such stockholder of Theraclone shall fail to perfect or shall effectively waive, withdraw or lose such stockholder’s rights under section 262 of the DGCL, such stockholder’s Dissenting Shares in respect of which the stockholder would otherwise be entitled to receive fair value under section 262 of the DGCL shall thereupon be deemed to have been canceled, at the Effective Time, and the holder thereof shall be entitled to receive the Merger Consideration (payable without any interest thereon) as compensation for such cancellation.

(ii) Theraclone shall give PharmAthene (A) prompt notice of any notice received by Theraclone of intent to demand the fair value of any Theraclone Common Shares, withdrawals of such notices and any other instruments or notices served pursuant to section 262 of the DGCL and (B) the opportunity to participate in all negotiations and proceedings with respect to the exercise of appraisal rights under section 262 of the DGCL. Theraclone shall not, except with the prior written consent of PharmAthene or as otherwise required by an order of a court of competent jurisdiction, (x) make any payment or other commitment with respect to any such exercise of appraisal rights, (y) offer to settle or settle any such rights or (z) waive any failure to timely deliver a written demand for appraisal or timely take any other action to perfect appraisal rights in accordance with the DGCL.

(g) No Fractional Shares.  No certificates or scrip representing fractional shares of PharmAthene Common Stock shall be issued upon the surrender for exchange of Certificates, no dividends or other distributions of PharmAthene shall relate to such fractional share interests and such fractional share interests shall not entitle the owner thereof to vote or to any rights of a stockholder of PharmAthene. PharmAthene shall pay to each holder of a Certificate an aggregate amount in cash (rounded to the nearest whole cent) equal to the product obtained by multiplying (A) the fractional share interest to which such holder (after aggregating all Theraclone Common Shares formerly represented by all Certificates surrendered by such holder) would otherwise be entitled by (B) the per share closing price of PharmAthene Common Stock on the last trading day immediately prior to the Closing Date on NYSE MKT LLC (as reported in Bloomberg Financial Markets or, if not reported thereby, such other authoritative source as the parties shall agree in writing).

(h) Stock Options and Warrants.

(i) At the Effective Time, each outstanding Theraclone Stock Option, whether vested or unvested, and the Theraclone Stock Incentive Plan shall be assumed by PharmAthene and Theraclone shall take all corporate action necessary to ensure that each Theraclone Stock Option shall become an option to acquire, on the same terms and conditions as were applicable under the Theraclone Stock Option immediately prior to the Effective Time, a number of shares of PharmAthene Common Stock equal to the number of Theraclone Common Shares subject to such Theraclone Stock Option immediately prior to the Effective Time multiplied by the Exchange Ratio, with the result rounded down to the nearest whole number. The exercise price per share of PharmAthene Common Stock for each assumed Theraclone Stock Option will equal the quotient obtained from dividing (x) the exercise price per share for the Theraclone Common Shares purchasable pursuant to the assumed Theraclone Stock Option immediately prior to the Effective Time by (y) the Exchange Ratio, with the result rounded up to the nearest whole cent. Such Theraclone Stock Options shall continue in effect on the same terms and conditions (including, if applicable, the vesting arrangements and other terms and conditions set forth in the Theraclone Equity Incentive Plan and the applicable stock option

A-8


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

agreement) to which they are subject (subject to the adjustments required by this Section 2.1(h) after giving effect to the Merger), except that all references to Theraclone therein shall be deemed to mean PharmAthene. To the extent permitted by applicable Law, all assumed Theraclone Stock Options that prior to the Effective Time were treated as incentive or non-qualified stock options under the Code shall from and after the Effective Time continue to be treated as incentive or non-qualified stock options, respectively, under the Code.

(ii) As soon as practicable after the Effective Time, PharmAthene shall deliver to the holders of the Theraclone Stock Options an appropriate notice evidencing the foregoing assumption setting forth the specific adjustments made to the assumed Theraclone Stock Options, as provided in this Section 2.1(h).

(iii) PharmAthene shall take all corporate action necessary to reserve for issuance a sufficient number of shares of PharmAthene Common Stock for delivery upon exercise of the Theraclone Stock Options assumed in accordance with this Section 2.1(h). As soon as practicable (but in no event more than ten (10) business days after the Effective Time), PharmAthene shall file a registration statement on Form S-8 (or any successor form) with respect to the shares of PharmAthene Common Stock subject to such assumed Theraclone Stock Options, and thereafter shall use commercially reasonable efforts to maintain the effectiveness of that registration statement for as long as any such assumed Theraclone Stock Options remain outstanding.

(iv) Theraclone shall take all requisite action so that, as of the Effective Time, each Theraclone Warrant is converted (as converted, a “Converted Warrant”), by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of the holder of that Theraclone Warrant, into a warrant exercisable for that number of shares of PharmAthene Common Stock equal to the product of (i) the aggregate number of Theraclone Common Shares or Theraclone Preferred Stock, as the case may be, for which such Theraclone Warrant was exercisable and (ii) the Exchange Ratio, rounded down to the nearest whole share. The exercise price per share of such Converted Warrant shall be equal to the quotient obtained from dividing (x) the exercise price per share of such Theraclone Warrant immediately prior to the Effective Time by (y) the Exchange Ratio, with the result rounded up to the nearest whole cent. All Converted Warrants shall continue to have, and be subject to, the same terms and conditions set forth in the respective Theraclone Warrants except as otherwise provided for herein.

Section 2.2 Exchange of Certificates.

(a) Exchange Agent.  At the Effective Time, PharmAthene shall deposit with Continental Stock Transfer and Trust Company (the “Exchange Agent”), for the benefit of the holders of certificates formerly representing Theraclone Common Shares (“Certificates”), certificates representing shares of PharmAthene Common Stock in the aggregate amount equal to the number of shares into which Theraclone Common Shares have been converted, less the Escrow Shares. In addition, PharmAthene shall deposit with the Exchange Agent, as necessary from time to time after the Effective Time, any dividends or other distributions payable pursuant to Section 2.2(c). All shares of PharmAthene Common Stock, dividends and distributions deposited with the Exchange Agent pursuant to this Section 2.2(a) shall hereinafter be referred to as the “Exchange Fund.” The Exchange Fund shall not be used for any other purpose.

(b) Exchange Procedures.  As soon as reasonably practicable after the Effective Time (and in any event within five Business Days), PharmAthene shall cause the Exchange Agent to mail to each holder of record of a Certificate whose Theraclone Common Shares were converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration, any dividends or other distributions payable pursuant to Section 2.2(c) and cash in lieu of any fractional shares payable pursuant to Section 2.1(g), (i) a form of letter of transmittal (which shall specify that delivery shall be effected, and risk of loss and title to the Certificates shall pass, only upon proper delivery of the Certificates to the Exchange Agent and which shall be in customary form and contain customary provisions) and (ii) instructions for use in effecting the surrender of the Certificates in exchange for the Merger Consideration, any dividends or other distributions payable pursuant to Section 2.2(c) and cash in lieu of any fractional shares payable pursuant to Section 2.1(g). Each holder of record of one or more Certificates shall, upon surrender to the Exchange Agent of such Certificate or

A-9


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Certificates, together with such letter of transmittal, duly executed, and such other documents as may reasonably be required by the Exchange Agent, be entitled to receive promptly in exchange therefor (i) a certificate or certificates representing that number of whole shares of PharmAthene Common Stock (after taking into account all Certificates surrendered by such holder) to which such holder is entitled pursuant to Section 2.1(a), (ii) any dividends or distributions payable pursuant to Section 2.2(c) and (iii) cash in lieu of any fractional shares payable pursuant to Section 2.1(g), and the Certificates so surrendered shall forthwith be canceled. In the event of a transfer of ownership of Theraclone Common Shares that are not registered in the transfer records of Theraclone, payment of the Merger Consideration in accordance with Section 2.1(a) may be made to a person other than the person in whose name the Certificate so surrendered is registered if such Certificate shall be properly endorsed or otherwise be in proper form for transfer and the person requesting such payment shall pay any transfer or other Taxes required by reason of the transfer or establish to the reasonable satisfaction of PharmAthene that such Taxes have been paid or are not applicable. Until surrendered as contemplated by this Section 2.2(b), each Certificate shall be deemed at any time after the Effective Time to represent only the right to receive upon such surrender the Merger Consideration, any dividends or other distributions payable pursuant to Section 2.2(c) and cash in lieu of any fractional shares payable pursuant to Section 2.1(g). No interest shall be paid or will accrue on any payment to holders of Certificates pursuant to the provisions of this ARTICLE II.

(c) Distributions with Respect to Unexchanged Shares.  No dividends or other distributions with respect to PharmAthene Common Stock with a record date on or after the Effective Time shall be paid to the holder of any unsurrendered Certificate with respect to the shares of PharmAthene Common Stock that the holder thereof has the right to receive upon the surrender thereof, and no cash payment in lieu of fractional shares of PharmAthene Common Stock shall be paid to any such holder pursuant to Section 2.1(g), in each case until the holder of such Certificate shall have surrendered such Certificate in accordance with this ARTICLE II. Following the surrender of any Certificate, there shall be paid to the record holder of the certificate representing whole shares of PharmAthene Common Stock issued in exchange therefor, without interest, (i) at the time of such surrender, the amount of dividends or other distributions with a record date on or after the Effective Time theretofore paid with respect to such whole shares of PharmAthene Common Stock and the amount of any cash payable in lieu of a fractional share of PharmAthene Common Stock to which such holder is entitled pursuant to Section 2.1(g) and (ii) at the appropriate payment date, the amount of dividends or other distributions with a record date on or after the Effective Time but prior to such surrender and a payment date subsequent to such surrender payable with respect to such whole shares of PharmAthene Common Stock.

(d) No Further Ownership Rights in Theraclone Common Shares.  The Merger Consideration, any dividends or other distributions as are payable pursuant to Section 2.2(c) and such cash in lieu of any fractional shares as is payable pursuant to Section 2.1(g) upon the surrender of Certificates in accordance with the terms of this ARTICLE II shall be deemed to have been in full satisfaction of all rights pertaining to the Theraclone Common Shares formerly represented by such Certificates, subject, however, to the Surviving Subsidiary’s obligation to pay any dividends or make any other distributions with a record date prior to the Effective Time which may have been declared or made by Theraclone on the Theraclone Common Shares in accordance with the terms of this Agreement prior to the Effective Time. At the close of business on the day on which the Effective Time occurs, the share transfer books of Theraclone shall be closed, and there shall be no further registration of transfers on the share transfer books of the Surviving Subsidiary of the Theraclone Common Shares that were outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time. If, after the Effective Time, any Certificate is presented to the Surviving Subsidiary for transfer, it shall be canceled and exchanged as provided in this ARTICLE II.

(e) Termination of the Exchange Fund.  Any portion of the Exchange Fund that remains undistributed to the holders of the Certificates for one year after the Effective Time shall be delivered to PharmAthene, upon demand, and any holders of the Certificates who have not theretofore complied with this ARTICLE II shall thereafter look only to PharmAthene for, and PharmAthene shall remain liable for, payment of their claim for the Merger Consideration, any dividends or other distributions payable pursuant to Section 2.2(c) and cash in lieu of any fractional shares payable pursuant to Section 2.1(g) in accordance with this ARTICLE II.

A-10


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(f) No Liability.  None of PharmAthene, Merger Sub, Theraclone, the Surviving Subsidiary or the Exchange Agent shall be liable to any person in respect of any shares of PharmAthene Common Stock, cash, dividends or other distributions from the Exchange Fund properly delivered to a public official pursuant to any applicable abandoned property, escheat or similar Law.

(g) Investment of Exchange Fund.  The Exchange Agent shall invest the cash included in the Exchange Fund as directed by PharmAthene; provided, however, that such investments shall be in obligations of or guaranteed by the United States of America, in commercial paper obligations rated A-1 or P-1 or better by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. or Standard & Poor’s Corporation, respectively, or in certificates of deposit, bank repurchase agreements or banker’s acceptances of commercial banks with capital exceeding $10 billion (based on the most recent financial statements of such bank which are then publicly available). Any interest and other income resulting from such investments shall be paid to and be income of PharmAthene. If for any reason (including losses) the cash in the Exchange Fund shall be insufficient to fully satisfy all of the payment obligations to be made in cash by the Exchange Agent hereunder, PharmAthene shall promptly deposit cash into the Exchange Fund in an amount which is equal to the deficiency in the amount of cash required to fully satisfy such cash payment obligations.

(h) Lost Certificates.  If any Certificate shall have been lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit of that fact by the person claiming such Certificate to be lost, stolen or destroyed (and without the requirement to post or deliver any bond), the Exchange Agent shall deliver in exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed Certificate the Merger Consideration, any dividends or other distributions payable pursuant to Section 2.2(c) and cash in lieu of any fractional shares payable pursuant to Section 2.1(g), in each case pursuant to this ARTICLE II.

(i) Withholding Rights.  PharmAthene, the Surviving Subsidiary or the Exchange Agent shall be entitled to deduct and withhold from the consideration otherwise payable pursuant to this Agreement such amounts as PharmAthene, the Surviving Subsidiary or the Exchange Agent are required to deduct and withhold with respect to the making of such payment under the Code or any provision of state, local or foreign Tax Law. To the extent that amounts are so withheld by PharmAthene, the Surviving Subsidiary or the Exchange Agent, such withheld amounts (i) shall be treated for all purposes of this Agreement as having been paid to the holder of Certificates in respect of which such deduction and withholding was made by PharmAthene, the Surviving Subsidiary or the Exchange Agent and (ii) shall be remitted by PharmAthene, the Surviving Subsidiary or the Exchange Agent, as the case may be, to the applicable Governmental Entity.

ARTICLE III
 
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THERACLONE

Except as disclosed in the corresponding sections or subsections of the disclosure schedules delivered to PharmAthene by Theraclone in connection with this Agreement (the “Theraclone Disclosure Schedule”) (it being agreed that disclosure of any item in any sections or subsections of the Theraclone Disclosure Schedule shall also be deemed disclosure with respect to any other sections or subsections of this Agreement to which the relevance of such item is reasonably apparent on the face of such disclosure), Theraclone represents and warrants to PharmAthene and Merger Sub as follows:

Section 3.1 Qualification, Organization, Subsidiaries, etc.

(a) Theraclone is a legal entity validly existing and in good standing under the Laws of Delaware and has all requisite corporate or similar power and authority to own, lease and operate its properties and assets and to carry on its business as presently conducted.

(b) Theraclone is qualified to do business and is in good standing as a foreign corporation in each jurisdiction where the ownership, leasing or operation of its assets or properties or conduct of its business requires such qualification, except where the failure to be so qualified or in good standing, or to have such power or authority has not had and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Theraclone Material Adverse Effect.

A-11


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(c) Theraclone has made available to PharmAthene prior to the date of this Agreement a true and complete copy of Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, each as amended through the date of this Agreement (such certificate of incorporation, the “Theraclone Certificate of Incorporation” and such bylaws, the “Theraclone Bylaws”). The Theraclone Certificate of Incorporation and Theraclone Bylaws are in full force and effect. Theraclone is not in violation of the Theraclone Certificate of Incorporation or the Theraclone Bylaws, other than such violations as have not had and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Theraclone Material Adverse Effect.

Section 3.2 Capital Stock.

(a) The authorized capital stock of Theraclone consists of 60,000,000 Theraclone Common Shares with $0.001 par value and 37,765,145 preferred shares (“Theraclone Preferred Shares”) with $0.001 par value. The capitalization of Theraclone is as set forth in Section 3.2(a) of the Theraclone Disclosure Schedule. All outstanding Theraclone Common Shares and Preferred Shares, and all Theraclone Common Shares and Preferred Shares reserved for issuance, when issued in accordance with the respective terms thereof, are or will be duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable and not issued in violation of any preemptive rights, purchase option, call or right of first refusal rights. Section 3.2(a) of the Theraclone Disclosure Schedule sets forth the exercise price of each Theraclone Stock Option and indicates whether such Theraclone Stock Option qualifies as an “incentive stock option” within the meaning of section 422 of the Code. As a result of the Conversion, no Theraclone Preferred Shares will be issued and outstanding as of the Closing.

(b) Except as set forth in subsection (a) above and as set forth in Section 3.2(a) of the Theraclone Disclosure Schedule, as of the date of this Agreement, (i) Theraclone does not have any shares of its capital stock issued or outstanding, and (ii) there are no outstanding subscriptions, options, stock appreciation rights, warrants, calls, convertible securities, restricted stock units, performance units, deferred stock units or other similar rights, agreements or commitments relating to the issuance of capital stock or voting securities to which Theraclone is a party obligating Theraclone to (A) issue, transfer or sell any shares of capital stock or other equity interests of Theraclone or securities convertible into or exchangeable for such shares or equity interests, (B) grant, extend or enter into any such subscription, option, stock appreciation right, warrant, call, convertible securities, restricted stock units, performance units, deferred stock units or other similar right, agreement or arrangement, or (C) redeem or otherwise acquire, or vote or dispose of, any such shares of capital stock or other equity interests.

(c) Except as set forth in subsection (a) above, Theraclone does not have any outstanding bonds, debentures, notes or other obligations, the holders of which have the right to vote (or which are convertible into or exercisable for securities having the right to vote) with the stockholders of Theraclone on any matter.

(d) There are no voting trusts or other agreements or understandings to which Theraclone is a party with respect to the voting of the capital stock or other equity interests of Theraclone.

(e) No consent or approval is required from the holder of any Theraclone Stock Option (other than in respect of the right of such shares to vote generally with the Theraclone Common Shares) to effectuate the terms of this Agreement.

(f) Theraclone has called all capital committed pursuant to that certain Series B-1 Preferred Stock and Warrant Purchase and Exchange Agreement, dated March 11, 2013, among Theraclone and the investors listed on Exhibit A thereto (the “Series B-1 Purchase Agreement”).

Section 3.3 Corporate Authority; No Violation.

(a) Theraclone has the requisite corporate power and authority to enter into this Agreement and, subject to receipt of the Theraclone Stockholder Approval, to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. The execution and delivery of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby have been duly and validly authorized by the Theraclone Board of Directors and, except for (i) the Theraclone Stockholder Approval and (ii) the filing of the Certificate of Merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, no other corporate proceedings on the part of Theraclone are

A-12


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

necessary to authorize this Agreement or the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby. The Theraclone Board of Directors, at a meeting duly called and held, has by unanimous vote of all its members, duly adopted resolutions (i) determining that it is in the best interests of Theraclone and its stockholders, and declared it advisable, to enter into this Agreement, (ii) approving this Agreement and authorizing the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, including the Merger, (iii) directing that the Theraclone Stockholder Approval Matters be submitted to a vote at a meeting of stockholders of Theraclone and (iv) recommending that stockholders of Theraclone vote in favor of the Theraclone Stockholder Approval Matters (the item set forth in clause (iv) of this sentence, the “Theraclone Recommendation”). This Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered by Theraclone and, assuming this Agreement constitutes the valid and binding agreement of PharmAthene and Merger Sub, constitutes the valid and binding agreement of Theraclone, enforceable against Theraclone in accordance with its terms.

(b) Subject to the accuracy of the representations and warranties of PharmAthene and Merger Sub in Section 4.2(b), no authorization, consent, permit, action or approval of, or filing with, or notification to, any United States federal, state or local, provincial or foreign governmental or regulatory agency, commission, court, body, entity or authority (each, a “Governmental Entity”) is necessary under applicable Law for the consummation by Theraclone of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, except for such authorizations, consents, permits, actions, approvals, notifications or filings required under (i) the DGCL, (ii) the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), (iii) the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and (iv) the items set forth on Section 3.3(b) of the Theraclone Disclosure Schedule (collectively, the “Theraclone Approvals”), and except for such authorizations, consents, permits, actions, approvals, notifications or filings that, if not obtained or made, would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Theraclone Material Adverse Effect.

(c) The execution and delivery by Theraclone of this Agreement does not, and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and compliance with the provisions of this Agreement will not (i) result in any violation of, or default (with or without notice or lapse of time, or both) under, or give rise to a right of termination, amendment, cancellation or acceleration of any material obligation or to the loss of a material benefit under, any loan or credit agreement, bond, debenture, note, mortgage, indenture, lease, supply agreement, license agreement, development agreement or other contract, agreement, obligation, commitment or instrument (each, including all amendments thereto, a “Contract”), to which Theraclone is a party or any of their respective properties or other assets is subject, (ii) conflict with or result in any violation of any provision of the Theraclone Certificate of Incorporation or the Theraclone Bylaws or (iii) assuming the Theraclone Approvals are obtained, conflict with or violate any applicable Laws, other than, in the case of clauses (i) and (iii), any such violation, conflict, default, termination, amendment, cancellation, acceleration, right or loss that has not had and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Theraclone Material Adverse Effect.

Section 3.4 Financial Statements.

(a) Theraclone has previously delivered to PharmAthene true, correct and complete copies of the following financial statements and notes (collectively, the “Theraclone Financial Statements”): (i) the audited balance sheet of Theraclone as of December 31, 2012 (the “Theraclone Balance Sheet”) and the related audited statement of operations, statement of changes in redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders’ deficit and statement of cash flows of Theraclone for the year ended December 31, 2012; and (ii) the unaudited balance sheet of Theraclone as of June 30, 2013 (the “Theraclone Unaudited Interim Balance Sheet”) and the related unaudited statement of operations, statement of stockholders’ equity and statement of cash flows of Theraclone for the six (6) months then ended. The Theraclone Financial Statements are accurate and complete in all material respects and fairly present the financial position of Theraclone as of the respective dates thereof and the results of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows of Theraclone for the periods covered thereby. Except as may be indicated in the notes to the Theraclone Financial Statements, the Theraclone Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP applied on a consistent basis throughout the periods covered.

A-13


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(b) No financial statements of any person other than Theraclone are required by GAAP to be included in Theraclone Financial Statements.

(c) Except as required by GAAP, Theraclone has not, between the last day of its most recently ended fiscal year and the date of this Agreement, made or adopted any material change in its accounting methods, practices or policies in effect on such last day of its most recently ended fiscal year.

(d) Theraclone’s external auditors have not identified to Theraclone any material weaknesses in Theraclone’s internal controls impacting on the reliability of Theraclone Financial Statements.

(e) Theraclone has not had any material dispute with any of its auditors regarding accounting matters or policies during any of its past three (3) full fiscal years or during the current fiscal year and it has no reason to believe that there will be an adjustment to, or any restatement of, the Theraclone Financial Statements. No current or former independent auditor for Theraclone has resigned or been dismissed from such capacity as a result of or in connection with any disagreement with Theraclone on a matter of accounting practices. The Theraclone Financial Statements were prepared from, and are consistent with, the accounting records of Theraclone. Theraclone has also delivered to the PharmAthene copies of all letters from Theraclone’s auditors to the Theraclone Board or audit committee thereof since January 1, 2010, together with copies of all responses thereto.

(f) Theraclone keeps books, records and accounts that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and acquisitions and dispositions of assets of Theraclone. Theraclone has designed and maintains a system of internal control over financial reporting sufficient to provide reasonable assurances regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Theraclone has provided to PharmAthene copies of all letters, advice, and analyses that it has received from any accountant, consultant, or advisor since January 1, 2010 relating to financial controls and accounting systems.

Section 3.5 No Undisclosed Liabilities.  Except for (i) those liabilities that are fully reflected or reserved for in the Theraclone Financial Statements, (ii) liabilities incurred since the date of the Theraclone Unaudited Interim Balance Sheet in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, (iii) those liabilities that are incurred after the date of this Agreement and are permitted to be incurred by this Agreement or are incurred as a result of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement (e.g., attorneys’ fees), (iv) liabilities and obligations incurred in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice that would not reasonably be expected, individually or in the aggregate, to have a Theraclone Material Adverse Effect, and (v) liabilities or obligations that have been discharged or paid in full in the ordinary course of business, as of the date of this Agreement, Theraclone does not have, and since the date of the Theraclone Unaudited Interim Balance Sheet Theraclone has not incurred, any liabilities or obligations of any nature whatsoever, whether or not accrued, absolute, matured, determined, contingent or otherwise, and whether or not required by GAAP to be reflected in the Theraclone Financial Statements in accordance with GAAP, other than those that have not had and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Theraclone Material Adverse Effect.

Section 3.6 Compliance with Law; Permits.

(a) Theraclone is, and at all times since January 1, 2008 has been, in compliance with and not in default under or in violation of any applicable federal, state, provincial, municipal, local or foreign law, statute, ordinance, rule, regulation, judgment, order, injunction, decree or agency requirement of any Governmental Entity (collectively, “Laws” and each, a “Law”), except (i) with respect to any Drug Laws, which are addressed in Section 3.22 and (ii) for any such non-compliance, default or violation that would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Theraclone Material Adverse Effect.

(b) Theraclone is in possession of all franchises, grants, authorizations, licenses, permits, easements, variances, exceptions, consents, certificates, approvals and orders of any Governmental Entity necessary for Theraclone to own, lease and operate its properties and assets or to carry on its businesses as they are now being conducted (the “Theraclone Permits”), except for any failure to have any of the Theraclone

A-14


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Permits that have not had and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Theraclone Material Adverse Effect. All Theraclone Permits are in full force and effect, except for any failure to be in full force and effect that has not had and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Theraclone Material Adverse Effect.

Section 3.7 Environmental Laws and Regulations.  Except as has not had and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Theraclone Material Adverse Effect, (i) Theraclone has conducted its businesses in compliance with all applicable Environmental Laws, (ii) to the knowledge of Theraclone, none of the properties leased or operated by Theraclone contains any Hazardous Substance in amounts which would reasonably be expected to give rise to liability under Environmental Laws, (iii) since January 1, 2008, Theraclone has not received any written notice, demand letter or written request for information from any Governmental Entity indicating that Theraclone or any person whose liability Theraclone has retained or assumed, either contractually or by operation of law, may be in violation of, or liable under, any Environmental Law, (iv) to the knowledge of Theraclone, no Hazardous Substance has been disposed of, released or transported in violation of any applicable Environmental Law, or in a manner which has given rise to any liability under Environmental Law, from any properties presently or formerly owned, leased or operated by Theraclone or any other property and (v) neither Theraclone nor any of its properties or any person whose liability Theraclone has retained or assumed, either contractually or by operation of law, is subject to any liabilities relating to any pending or, to the knowledge of Theraclone, threatened suit, settlement, court order, administrative order, regulatory requirement, judgment or written claim asserted or arising under any Environmental Law.

Section 3.8 Employee Benefit Plans.

(a) Section 3.8(a) of the Theraclone Disclosure Schedule sets forth a true and complete list of each benefit plan, arrangement, agreement, program, practice, and policy, including each employee welfare benefit plan (including post-retirement health and insurance plan) within the meaning of section 3(1) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), each employee pension benefit plan within the meaning of section 3(2) of ERISA, and each bonus, incentive, deferred compensation, profit-sharing, savings, retirement, vacation, sick leave, share purchase, incentive compensation, equity or equity-based, severance, retention, employment (other than employment agreements that are terminable at-will without notice or without liability), consulting, change of control, fringe benefit, and employee loan plan, arrangement, agreement, program, practice, and policy, whether written or unwritten (the “Theraclone Benefit Plans”), in each case that is sponsored, maintained, or contributed to, or required to be maintained or contributed to, by Theraclone, or to which Theraclone or any person or entity that, together with Theraclone, is treated as a single employer under section 414 of the Code (a “Commonly Controlled Entity”), has any direct or indirect liability, contingent or otherwise, for the benefit of any current or former director, officer, employee, consultant, or independent contractor of Theraclone.

(b) With respect to each material Theraclone Benefit Plan, Theraclone has made available to PharmAthene complete and accurate copies of each of the following documents, as applicable: (i) such written Theraclone Benefit Plan (including all amendments thereto) or a written description of any such Theraclone Benefit Plan that is not otherwise in writing, (ii) the three most recent Annual Reports on IRS Form 5500 Series and accompanying schedules, if any, (iii) the most recent actuarial valuation report required to be filed under ERISA or required pursuant to applicable Laws or the terms of such Theraclone Benefit Plan (iv) a copy of the most recent summary plan description (“SPD”), together with all summaries of material modifications issued with respect to such SPD, if required under ERISA or required pursuant to applicable Laws or the terms of such Theraclone Benefit Plan, (v) if such Theraclone Benefit Plan is funded through a trust or any other funding vehicle, a copy of the trust or other funding agreement (including all material amendments thereto) and the latest financial statements thereof, if any, (vi) all contracts relating to such Theraclone Benefit Plan with respect to which Theraclone or any Commonly Controlled Entity may have any material liability, including insurance contracts, investment management agreements, subscription and participation agreements and record keeping agreements, (vii) the most recent determination letter received from (or determination letter request submitted to) the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) or the most recent master or prototype opinion letter issued by the IRS with respect to a master or prototype plan adopted by Theraclone or any Commonly Controlled Entity upon

A-15


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

which such sponsor is entitled to rely (if applicable) with respect to any Theraclone Benefit Plan that is intended to be qualified under section 401(a) of the Code and (viii) communications (other than routine communications) from the IRS, the Department of Labor or the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation or any successor thereto with respect to any such Theraclone Benefit Plan.

(c) (i) Each of the Theraclone Benefit Plans (and any related trust or other funding vehicle) has been established and administered in compliance in all material respects with its terms and applicable Laws, including, but not limited to, ERISA and the Code and in each case the regulations thereunder and (ii) with respect to each of the Theraclone Benefit Plans intended to be “qualified” within the meaning of section 401(a) of the Code, either the IRS has issued a favorable determination or opinion letter that has not been revoked, or an application for a favorable determination or opinion letter was timely submitted to the IRS for which no final action has been taken by the IRS, or the plan is relying on a prototype or volume submitter letter, and, to the knowledge of Theraclone there are no existing circumstances or events that have occurred that could reasonably be expected to adversely affect the qualified status of any such plan.

(d) Neither Theraclone nor any Commonly Controlled Entity has during the period beginning with the sixth plan year preceding the plan year that includes the Effective Time ever sponsored, maintained, contributed to, or been required to maintain or contribute to, or has any actual or contingent liability under any employee benefit plan subject to Title IV or section 302 of ERISA or sections 412 or 4971 of the Code, or any “multiemployer pension plan” (as such term is defined in section 3(37) of ERISA), and neither Theraclone nor any Commonly Controlled Entity has incurred any withdrawal liability which remains unsatisfied, and to the knowledge of Theraclone, no events have occurred and no circumstances exist that could reasonably be expected to result in any such liability to Theraclone.

(e) All material contributions and other amounts payable by Theraclone as of the date of this Agreement with respect to each Theraclone Benefit Plan in respect of any plan year during the period beginning with the sixth plan year preceding the plan year that includes the Effective Time have been paid or, if not yet due have been properly accrued in accordance with GAAP in all material respects. Theraclone has not engaged in a transaction in connection with which Theraclone became, or could reasonably be expected to become, subject to either a material civil penalty assessed pursuant to sections 409 or 502(i) of ERISA or a material Tax imposed pursuant to sections 4975 or 4976 of the Code. There are no material pending or, to the knowledge of Theraclone, threatened claims (other than routine claims for benefits) by, on behalf of or against any of the Theraclone Benefit Plans or any trusts related thereto.

(f) Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby (either alone or in conjunction with any other event, including any termination of employment at or following the Effective Time) will (i) cause any material payment (including, without limitation, severance, unemployment compensation, change in control payment, “excess parachute payment” (within the meaning of section 280G of the Code), forgiveness of indebtedness, or other compensation or benefits) to become due to any current or former director, officer, employee, consultant, or independent contractor of Theraclone from Theraclone or any Commonly Controlled Entity under any Theraclone Benefit Plan or otherwise (other than amounts payable to any such person in his or her capacity as an equityholder of Theraclone), (ii) materially increase any benefits otherwise payable under any Theraclone Benefit Plan, (iii) result in any acceleration of the time of payment or vesting of any such benefits, (iv) require the funding of any such benefits, (v) result in any breach or violation of or default under, or limit (except as may be specifically set forth in this Agreement) Theraclone’s right to amend, modify, or terminate any collective bargaining agreement or Theraclone Benefit Plan, or (vi) result in the payment of any amount that would, individually or in combination with any other such payment, not be deductible as a result of section 280G of the Code. Section 3.8(f) of the Theraclone Disclosure Schedule sets forth, as of the date hereof, individuals the Company reasonably believes are “disqualified individuals” within the meaning of section 280G of the Code and the Regulations thereunder.

(g) All Theraclone Stock Options have an exercise price per share that was not less than the “fair market value” of one Theraclone Common Share on the date of grant. All Theraclone Stock Options have

A-16


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

been properly accounted for in accordance with GAAP in all material respects, and no change is expected in respect of any prior financial statements relating to expenses for stock-based compensation. There is no pending audit, investigation or inquiry by any Governmental Entity or by Theraclone (directly or indirectly) with respect to Theraclone’s stock option granting practices or other equity compensation practices. The grant date of each Theraclone Stock Option is on or after the date on which such grant was authorized by Theraclone board of directors or the compensation committee thereof.

(h) Each Theraclone Benefit Plan that is a “nonqualified deferred compensation plan” (as defined in section 409A(d)(1) of the Code) subject to section 409A of the Code has been operated since January 1, 2005 in good faith compliance with section 409A of the Code and the regulations and guidance promulgated thereunder.

(i) No Theraclone Benefit Plan provides benefits, including death or medical, health, or other welfare benefits (whether or not insured), with respect to current or former directors, officers, employees, consultants, or independent contractors of Theraclone or any Commonly Controlled Entity after retirement or other termination of service other than (i) coverage mandated by applicable Laws (including continuation coverage under section 4980B of the Code), (ii) death benefits or retirement benefits under any “employee pension benefit plan,” as such term is defined in section 3(2) of ERISA, (iii) deferred compensation benefits accrued as liabilities on the books of Theraclone or a Commonly Controlled Entity or (iv) benefits the full direct cost of which is borne by the current or former employee (or beneficiary thereof), and no circumstances exist that would reasonably be expected to cause Theraclone or a Commonly Controlled Entity to become obligated to provide any such benefits.

(j) No Theraclone Benefit Plan is subject to the laws of any jurisdiction outside of the United States.

Section 3.9 Absence of Certain Changes or Events.  From the date of the Theraclone Unaudited Interim Balance Sheet to the date hereof, (i) the businesses of Theraclone has been conducted in all material respects in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice and (ii) there has not been any change, effect, event, development, occurrence or state of facts that has had, or would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Theraclone Material Adverse Effect.

Section 3.10 Investigations; Litigation.  Except with respect to any Drug Laws, which are addressed in Section 3.22, (a) there is no investigation or review pending (or, to the knowledge of Theraclone, threatened) by any Governmental Entity with respect to Theraclone and (b) there are no actions, suits, arbitrations, mediations or proceedings pending (or, to the knowledge of Theraclone, threatened) against Theraclone, or any of their respective properties at law or in equity before, and there are no orders, judgments or decrees of, or before, any Governmental Entity, in the case of each of clause (a) or (b), which has had or would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Theraclone Material Adverse Effect.

Section 3.11 Proxy Statement; Other Information.  None of the information provided by Theraclone to be included in the Proxy Statement will, at the time of the mailing of the Proxy Statement or any amendment or supplement thereto or at the time of the PharmAthene Meeting, contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. None of the information provided by Theraclone to be included in the Form S-4 Registration Statement will, at the time the Form S-4 Registration Statement is filed with the SEC or at the time it becomes effective under the Securities Act, contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.

Section 3.12 Tax Matters.

(a) (i) Theraclone has prepared in material compliance with the prescribed manner and filed within the time required by applicable Law (taking into account any extension of time within which to file) all material Tax Returns required to be filed by it with all relevant Governmental Entities, and all such Tax Returns are true, correct and complete in all material respects;

A-17


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(ii) Theraclone has timely paid all material Taxes whether or not shown on any Tax Return that are required to have been paid by it;

(iii) the Theraclone Financial Statements reflect adequate reserves for all material unpaid Taxes payable by Theraclone for all taxable periods and portions thereof through the date of such financial statements and Theraclone has not incurred any material Tax liability since the date of such financial statements other than for Taxes arising in the ordinary course of business; and

(iv) as of the date of this Agreement, there are not pending or, to the knowledge of Theraclone, threatened, any audits, examinations, assessments, reassessments or other proceedings in respect of any Tax liability of Theraclone.

(b) There are no waivers of any statute of limitations in respect of assessment or collection of Taxes or any agreements or requests for an extension of time for assessment or collection of any Tax, which waiver or extension is currently effective.

(c) Theraclone is not a party to any agreement relating to Tax allocation, Tax indemnification or Tax sharing and Theraclone does not have any liability for Taxes of any person (other than members of the affiliated group, within the meaning of section 1504(a) of the Code, filing consolidated federal income Tax Returns of which Theraclone is the common parent) under Treasury Regulation section 1.1502-6, Treasury Regulation section 1.1502-78 or any similar state, local or non-U.S. Laws, as a transferee or successor, by contract or otherwise.

(d) No claim in writing has been made against Theraclone by any Governmental Entity in a jurisdiction where Theraclone does not file Tax Returns that Theraclone is or may be subject to taxation by that jurisdiction. All deficiencies for Taxes asserted or assessed in writing against Theraclone has been fully and timely paid, settled or properly reflected in the Theraclone Financial Statements.

(e) Theraclone has made available to PharmAthene correct and complete copies of all material U.S. federal income Tax Returns, state income Tax apportionment data, examination reports and statements of deficiencies for which the applicable statutory periods of limitations have not yet expired.

(f) There are no material liens, claims, mortgages, encumbrances, pledges, security interests, equities or charges of any kind (each, a “Lien”) for Taxes upon any of the assets of Theraclone, except for Permitted Liens.

(g) Theraclone has withheld and paid to the appropriate Governmental Entity all material Taxes required to have been withheld and paid by Theraclone in connection with amounts paid to any employee, independent contractor, creditor, stockholder, or third party for all periods ending on or before the Closing Date.

(h) Theraclone has not constituted a “distributing corporation” or a “controlled corporation” (within the meaning of section 355(a)(1)(A) of the Code) in a distribution that could constitute part of a “plan” or “series of related transactions” (within the meaning of section 355(e) of the Code) in conjunction with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

(i) Any closing agreements under section 7121 of the Code or any similar provision of state, local or non-U.S. Laws or full acceptance letters which Theraclone has executed, entered into or received is valid and enforceable in accordance with its terms. Theraclone has not committed fraud, collusion, concealment or malfeasance or made a misrepresentation of material fact in connection with the execution or entering into of any closing agreement with, or the receipt of any full acceptance letter or private letter ruling from any Governmental Entity.

(j) Theraclone has not agreed to and is not required to make any adjustment pursuant to section 481(a) of the Code or any similar provision of applicable Law, and Theraclone has no knowledge that any Governmental Entity has proposed any such adjustment, nor does Theraclone have any application pending with any Governmental Entity requesting permission for any change in accounting methods. There is no taxable income of Theraclone that will be required under any applicable Law to be reported in a taxable period beginning after the Closing Date which taxable income was realized (or

A-18


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

reflects economic income) arising prior to the Closing Date as a result of any: (i) change in method of accounting for a taxable period ending on or prior to the Closing Date; (ii) “closing agreement” as described in section 7121 of the Code executed on or prior to the Closing Date; (iii) installment sale or open transaction disposition made on or prior to the Closing Date; or (iv) election under section 108(i) of the Code.

(k) Theraclone has never participated in any reportable transaction within the meaning of Treasury Regulation section 1.6011-4(b) or taken any position on any Tax Return that would subject it to a substantial understatement of Tax penalty under section 6662 of the Code which has not been properly disclosed to the IRS as required by the Code and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder.

(l) Theraclone has never been a “United States real property holding corporation,” as defined in section 897(c)(2) of the Code, at any time during the past three years or made an election under section 897(i) of the Code to be treated as a domestic corporation for purposes of sections 897, 1445 and 6039C of the Code or been a passive foreign investment company within the meaning of section 1297 of the Code. Theraclone has never had a permanent establishment in any country other than the United States, nor has it engaged in a trade or business in any country other than the United States that subjected it to Tax in such country.

(m) Theraclone has no knowledge of any fact, agreement, plan or other circumstance that would cause the Merger to fail to qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of section 368(a) of the Code.

(n) No employee, director, consultant or other service provider of Theraclone is entitled to receive any gross up payment from Theraclone by reason of any taxes imposed by Section 4999 of the Code.

Section 3.13 Employee Relations Matters.

(a) Theraclone is not a party to, or bound by, any collective bargaining agreement, contract or other agreement or understanding with a labor union, labor organization, trade union or works council. Theraclone has not committed any material unfair labor practice as defined in the National Labor Relations Act or other applicable Laws. To the knowledge of Theraclone, there are no organizational efforts with respect to the formation of a collective bargaining unit or, as of the date of this Agreement, labor union organizing activities being made or threatened involving employees of Theraclone.

(b) There are no pending or, to the knowledge of Theraclone, threatened arbitrations, grievances, labor disputes, strikes, lockouts, slowdowns or work stoppages against Theraclone, nor, to the knowledge of Theraclone, has there been any of the foregoing that has had, or would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Theraclone Material Adverse Effect.

(c) Theraclone is and has been in compliance in all material respects with all applicable Laws respecting employment and employment practices, including all Laws respecting terms and conditions of employment, health and safety, wages and hours, child labor, immigration, employment discrimination, disability rights or benefits, equal opportunity, plant closures and layoffs, affirmative action, workers’ compensation, labor relations, employee leave issues, employee classifications, and unemployment insurance. Theraclone is not in any material respect delinquent in payments to any employees or former employees for any services or amounts required to be reimbursed or otherwise paid. Theraclone is not a party to, or otherwise bound by, any order of any Governmental Entity relating to employees or employment practices other than any ordinary course settlement with a Governmental Entity, in each case in an amount not more than $100,000 individually.

(d) Theraclone has not received written notice of (i) any unfair labor practice charge or complaint pending or threatened before the National Labor Relations Board or any other Governmental Entity against it, (ii) any complaints, grievances or arbitrations against it arising out of any collective bargaining agreement, (iii) any charge or complaint with respect to or relating to it pending before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or any other Governmental Entity responsible for the prevention of unlawful employment practices, (iv) the intent of any Governmental Entity responsible for the enforcement of labor, employment, wages and hours of work, child labor, immigration, or occupational safety and health Laws to conduct an investigation with respect to or relating to them or such

A-19


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

investigation is in progress or (v) any complaint, lawsuit or other proceeding pending or, to the knowledge of Theraclone, threatened in any forum by or on behalf of any present or former employee of such entities, any applicant for employment or classes of the foregoing alleging breach of any express or implied contract of employment, any applicable Law governing employment or the termination thereof or other discriminatory, wrongful or tortious conduct in connection with the employment relationship, in each case, which has had or would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Theraclone Material Adverse Effect.

(e) Theraclone is not currently engaged in any layoffs or employment terminations sufficient in number to trigger application of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, as amended (the “WARN Act”) or any similar state, local or foreign Law. During the ninety (90) day period prior to the date of this Agreement, not more than thirty (30) employees of Theraclone were terminated from any single site of employment.

(f) As of the date of this Agreement, no Theraclone Key Employee has given notice terminating employment with Theraclone, which termination will be effective on or after the date of this Agreement. For the purposes hereof (“Theraclone Key Employee”) means the persons set forth in Section 3.13(f) of the Theraclone Disclosure Schedule.

Section 3.14 Intellectual Property.

(a) To the knowledge of Theraclone, Theraclone owns, licenses, sublicenses or otherwise possesses legally enforceable rights to use all Intellectual Property material to the conduct of the business of Theraclone, as currently conducted and as currently proposed to be conducted (in each case excluding generally commercially available, off-the-shelf software programs).

(b) The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Theraclone and the consummation of the Merger will not result in the breach of or loss of rights under, or create on behalf of any third party the right to terminate or modify, (i) any license, sublicense or other agreement relating to any Intellectual Property owned by Theraclone under which Theraclone has granted an exclusive license or which is otherwise material to the business of Theraclone, as currently conducted and as currently proposed to be conducted (the “Theraclone Intellectual Property”), or (ii) any license, sublicense or other agreement to which Theraclone is a party and pursuant to which Theraclone is authorized to use any third party’s Intellectual Property on an exclusive basis or that is otherwise material to the business of Theraclone, as currently conducted and as currently proposed to be conducted, excluding generally commercially available, off-the-shelf software programs (the “Theraclone Third Party Intellectual Property”). The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Theraclone and the consummation of the Merger will not, as a result of any contract to which Theraclone is a party, result in PharmAthene or Theraclone granting to any third party any rights or licenses to any Intellectual Property or the release or disclosure of any trade secrets that would not have been granted or released absent such execution or consummation.

(c) Section 3.14(c) of the Theraclone Disclosure Schedule sets forth a complete and accurate list of all U.S. and foreign issued patents and pending patent applications and registered trademarks, service marks, copyrights and domain names owned or co-owned by Theraclone material to the conduct of the business of Theraclone, as currently conducted and as currently proposed to be conducted. Section 3.14(c) of the Theraclone Disclosure Schedule sets forth a complete and accurate list of all U.S. and foreign issued patents and pending patent applications and registered trademarks, service marks, copyrights and domain names material to the conduct of the business of Theraclone, as currently conducted and as currently proposed to be conducted, licensed to Theraclone, and Section 3.14(c) of the Theraclone Disclosure Schedule sets forth a complete and accurate list of all other licenses to Theraclone of Theraclone Intellectual Property or Theraclone Third Party Intellectual Property.

(d) To the knowledge of Theraclone, all items of Intellectual Property set forth in Section 3.14(c) of the Theraclone Disclosure Schedule are subsisting and have not expired or been cancelled, all maintenance and renewal fees necessary to preserve such rights have been paid, and all such rights (other than such rights that are currently the subject of pending applications) are valid and enforceable. Theraclone has implemented commercially reasonable measures to maintain the confidentiality of

A-20


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone Intellectual Property of a nature that Theraclone intends to keep confidential. To the knowledge of Theraclone, no third party is infringing, violating or misappropriating any of the Theraclone Intellectual Property or Theraclone Third Party Intellectual Property, except for infringements, violations or misappropriations that, individually or in the aggregate, have not had, and would not be reasonably likely to have, a Theraclone Material Adverse Effect.

(e) To the knowledge of Theraclone, the conduct of the business of Theraclone as currently conducted and as currently proposed to be conducted does not infringe, violate, conflict with or constitute a misappropriation of any Intellectual Property of any third party. Since January 1, 2008, Theraclone has not received any written claim or notice alleging any such infringement, violation or misappropriation.

(f) All former and current employees, consultants and contractors of Theraclone who contribute or have contributed to the creation or development of any Intellectual Property for or on behalf of Theraclone material to the conduct of the business of Theraclone, as currently conducted and as currently proposed to be conducted, have executed written instruments that assign to Theraclone all right, title and interest in and to any such contributions.

(g) Theraclone’s collection, storage, use and dissemination of personally identifiable information is and since January 1, 2008, has been in compliance in all material respects with all applicable Law, including Laws relating to privacy, data security and data protection, and all applicable privacy policies and terms of use or other contractual obligations applicable thereto. Since January 1, 2008, there have been no written allegations or claims received by Theraclone from any Governmental Entity or any person of a breach of any such Laws, policies or obligations. To the knowledge of Theraclone, since January 1, 2008, there have been no material losses or thefts of any such information.

(h) Except as set forth in Section 3.14 of the Theraclone Disclosure Schedule, Theraclone has no royalty payment obligations, or agreements with respect to royalty obligations, or understandings that could give rise to royalty obligations, however calculated, with respect to sales, sublicensing or commercialization of any products (including products under development), or with respect to the use of any Theraclone Intellectual Property necessary to create, develop, test or manufacture such products, or used in conjunction with such products.

Section 3.15 Real Property.

(a) Theraclone does not own any real property.

(b) Theraclone has a good leasehold estate in each lease of real property (“Real Property Leases”), under which Theraclone is a tenant or a subtenant (“Leased Real Property”), in each case free and clear of all Liens and defects in title, other than Permitted Liens. Theraclone is not in breach of or default under the terms of any Real Property Lease, except for any such breach or default that has not had and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Theraclone Material Adverse Effect. To the knowledge of Theraclone, no other party to any Real Property Lease is in breach of or default under the terms of any Real Property Lease, which breach or default has had or would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Theraclone Material Adverse Effect. Each Real Property Lease is a valid and binding obligation of Theraclone and, to the knowledge of Theraclone, of each other party thereto, and is in full force and effect, except that (i) such enforcement may be subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other similar Laws, now or hereafter in effect, relating to creditors’ rights generally and (ii) equitable remedies of specific performance and injunctive and other forms of equitable relief may be subject to equitable defenses and to the discretion of the court before which any proceeding therefor may be brought.

(c) Section 3.15(c) of the Theraclone Disclosure Schedule sets forth, as of the date of this Agreement, a true and complete list of all leases, subleases or similar agreements under which Theraclone is the landlord or the sublandlord (such leases, subleases and similar agreements, collectively, the “Real Property Subleases”). Theraclone is not in breach of or default under the terms of any Real Property Sublease, except for any such breach or default that has not had and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Theraclone Material Adverse Effect. To the knowledge of Theraclone, no other party to any Real Property Sublease is in breach of or default under the terms of any

A-21


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Real Property Sublease except for any such breach or default that has not had and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Theraclone Material Adverse Effect. Each Real Property Sublease is a valid and binding obligation of Theraclone and, to the knowledge of Theraclone, is in full force and effect, except that (i) such enforcement may be subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other similar Laws, now or hereafter in effect, relating to creditors’ rights generally and (ii) equitable remedies of specific performance and injunctive and other forms of equitable relief may be subject to equitable defenses and to the discretion of the court before which any proceeding therefor may be brought.

Section 3.16 Required Vote of Theraclone Stockholders.  Except for the approval (“Theraclone Stockholder Approval”) by the written consent of (a) (i) holders of at least a majority of the outstanding Theraclone Common Shares and outstanding shares of Theraclone Preferred Stock (voting together as a single voting class on an as-converted to Theraclone Common Shares basis) and (ii) the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of the Theraclone Preferred Stock (voting together as a single voting class on an as-converted to Theraclone Common Shares basis) in favor of the adoption of this Agreement and the Merger and the election of the PharmAthene Board Designees and the Theraclone Board Designees and (b) holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of the Theraclone Preferred Stock in favor of the conversion of the shares of Theraclone Preferred Stock into Theraclone Common Shares on a one-for-one basis (the matters in clauses (a) and (b) together, the “Theraclone Stockholder Approval Matters”), no vote of the stockholders of Theraclone or the holders of any other securities of Theraclone (equity or otherwise) is required by any applicable Law, the certificate of incorporation or bylaws or other equivalent organizational documents of Theraclone to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby.

Section 3.17 Takeover Statutes.  Assuming that none of PharmAthene, Merger Sub or any of their “affiliates” or “associates” (as defined in section 203 of the DGCL) has been an “interested stockholder” (as defined in section 203 of the DGCL) at any time within three years prior to the date hereof, none of section 203 of the DGCL, any other state anti-takeover statute or regulation, or any takeover-related provision in the Theraclone Certificate of Incorporation or Theraclone Bylaws would prohibit or restrict the ability of Theraclone to consummate the Merger or of the Theraclone stockholders party to the Theraclone Voting Agreement to perform their respective obligations thereunder.

Section 3.18 Material Contracts.

(a) Except as disclosed in Section 3.18 of the Theraclone Disclosure Schedule, and except for this Agreement, Theraclone is not bound by any contract, arrangement, commitment or understanding:

(i) that constitutes a partnership, joint venture, technology sharing or similar agreement between Theraclone and any other person;

(ii) with respect to the service of any directors, officers, employees, or independent contractors or consultants that are natural persons, involving the payment of $100,000 or more in any 12 month period, other than those that are terminable by Theraclone on no more than 30 days’ notice without penalty;

(iii) that limits the ability of Theraclone to compete or enter into in any line of business, in any geographic area or with any person and, in each case, which limitation or requirement would reasonably be expected to be material to Theraclone;

(iv) with or to a labor union, works council or guild (including any collective bargaining agreement or similar agreement);

(v) relating to the use or right to use Intellectual Property, including any license or royalty agreements, other than agreements entered into in the ordinary course of business and that are not material to Theraclone;

(vi) that provides for indemnification by Theraclone to any person, other than an agreement entered into in the ordinary course of business and that is not material to Theraclone;

A-22


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(vii) between Theraclone and any current or former director or officer of Theraclone, or any affiliate of any such person (other than Theraclone Benefit Plan);

(viii) with respect to (A) Indebtedness, (B) any capital lease obligations to any person other than Theraclone, (C) any obligations to any person other than Theraclone in respect of letters of credit and bankers’ acceptances, (D) any indebtedness to any person other than Theraclone under interest rate swap, hedging or similar agreements, (E) any obligations to pay to any person other than Theraclone the deferred purchase price of property or services, (F) indebtedness secured by any Lien on any property owned by Theraclone even though the obligor has not assumed or otherwise become liable for the payment thereof, or (G) any guaranty of any such obligations described in clauses (A) through (F) of any person other than Theraclone, in each case, having an outstanding amount in excess of $250,000 individually or $500,000 in the aggregate;

(ix) that is material to Theraclone or that contains any so called “most favored nation” provision or similar provisions requiring Theraclone to offer to a person any terms or conditions that are at least as favorable as those offered to one or more other persons;

(x) pursuant to which any agent, sales representative, distributor or other third party markets or sells any Theraclone Product;

(xi) pursuant to which Theraclone is a party granting rights of first refusal, rights of first offer or similar rights to acquire any business or assets of the Theraclone;

(xii) relating to the purchase or sale of assets outside the ordinary course of business of Theraclone;

(xiii) relating to the issuance of any securities of Theraclone (other than those set forth on Section 3.2(a) to the Disclosure Schedule);

(xiv) pursuant to which any material asset of Theraclone is leased;

(xv) relates to the purchase of (A) any equipment entered into since December 31, 2012 and (B) any materials, supplies, or inventory since December 31, 2012, other than any agreement which, together with any other related agreement, involves the expenditure by the Theraclone of less than $100,000;

(xvi) that represents a purchase order with any supplier for the purchase of inventory items in an amount in excess of $100,000 of materials;

(xvii) pursuant to which Theraclone is a party and having a remaining term of more than one (1) year after the date hereof or involving a remaining amount payable thereunder (either to or from Theraclone) as of the date hereof, of at least $100,000;

(xviii) that involves the payment of $250,000 or more in any 12 month period after the date hereof; or

(xix) that would prevent, delay or impede the consummation, or otherwise reduce the contemplated benefits, of any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

Theraclone has previously made available to PharmAthene or its representatives complete and accurate copies of each Contract of the type described in this Section 3.18(a) (collectively referred to herein as “Theraclone Material Contracts”).

(b) All of the Theraclone Material Contracts were entered into at arms’ length in the ordinary course of business and are valid and in full force and effect, except to the extent they have previously expired in accordance with their terms. Theraclone has not given or received a notice of cancellation or termination under any Theraclone Material Contract, or has, or is alleged to have, and to the knowledge of Theraclone, none of the other parties thereto have, violated any provision of, or committed or failed to perform any act, and no event or condition exists, which with or without notice, lapse of time or both would constitute a default under the provisions of, any Theraclone Material Contract.

A-23


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(c) Theraclone is not in breach of or default under the terms of any Theraclone Material Contract, except for any such breach or default that has not had and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Theraclone Material Adverse Effect. To the knowledge of Theraclone, no other party to any Theraclone Material Contract is in breach of or default under the terms of any Theraclone Material Contract except for any such breach or default that has not had and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Theraclone Material Adverse Effect. Each Theraclone Material Contract is a valid and binding obligation of Theraclone and, to the knowledge of Theraclone, of each other party thereto, and is in full force and effect, except that (i) such enforcement may be subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other similar Laws, now or hereafter in effect, relating to creditors’ rights generally and (ii) equitable remedies of specific performance and injunctive and other forms of equitable relief may be subject to equitable defenses and to the discretion of the court before which any proceeding therefor may be brought.

Section 3.19 Finders or Brokers.  Theraclone has not employed any investment banker, broker or finder in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement who is entitled to any fee or any commission in connection with or upon consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby.

Section 3.20 Insurance.  Theraclone owns or holds policies of insurance in amounts that Theraclone has determined in good faith provide reasonably adequate coverage for its business and in amounts sufficient to comply with (i) applicable Law and (ii) all Theraclone Material Contracts to which Theraclone is a party or is otherwise bound.

Section 3.21 Affiliate Transactions.  There are no transactions, agreements or arrangements between (i) Theraclone on the one hand, and (ii) any director, executive officer or affiliate of Theraclone or any of their respective affiliates or immediate family members, on the other hand, of the type that would be required to be disclosed under Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act (such transactions referred to herein as “Theraclone Affiliate Transactions”).

Section 3.22 Food And Drug Administration Matters.

(a) Theraclone is not in violation of the United States Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended, 21 U.S.C. Section 301 et seq. (“FDCA”), the United States Public Health Service Act, as amended (“PHSA”), including 42 U.S.C. Sections 262, 264, 282, and 284, the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. Sections 3729 through 3733, as amended, the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. Section 801 et seq., as amended, any federal or state anti-kickback laws, or the regulations and regulatory guidance promulgated thereunder or similar Laws of any state, municipality, or foreign jurisdiction (collectively, “Drug Laws”) applicable to their activities, including, but not limited to, those relating to GLP (as defined below), good clinical practices, adverse event reporting, good manufacturing practices, recordkeeping, user fees, clinical trial registries, and filing of reports, except for such violations that would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Theraclone Material Adverse Effect. Theraclone has not received any written notice or other written communication from the United States Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) or any other Governmental Entity alleging any violation of any Drug Law, including any failure to maintain systems and programs adequate to ensure compliance with any applicable Law related to product quality, including “Good Manufacturing Practice,” “Good Laboratory Practice,” and “Good Clinical Practice” as those terms are defined by the FDA and in all applicable Drug Laws, by Theraclone relating to any activity that is subject to Drug Laws. Theraclone, and any third party acting on behalf of Theraclone, has not received any (i) notices of inspectional observations (including those recorded on form FDA 483), warning letters, untitled letters from the FDA or any other Governmental Entity, (ii) notice of any intention to conduct an investigation or review from the FDA or any other Governmental Entity, or (iii) other written documents issued by the FDA or any other Governmental Entity that indicate lack of compliance with any Drug Law by Theraclone or by persons who are otherwise performing services for the benefit of Theraclone.

(b) Theraclone has all registrations, applications, licenses, requests for approvals, exemptions, permits and other regulatory authorizations (collectively, “Authorizations”) from Governmental Entities that are material to the conduct of the business of Theraclone, as currently conducted, and such Authorizations are in full force and effect in all material respects. Theraclone has filed all material reports, notifications and

A-24


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

filings with, and have paid all material regulatory fees to, the applicable Governmental Entity necessary to maintain all of such Authorizations in full force and effect. Theraclone is, and has been, in compliance in all material respects with the terms of all Authorizations. Theraclone has not received written notice to the effect that a Governmental Entity was or is considering the amendment, termination, revocation or cancellation of any Authorization. The consummation of the Merger or any of the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement, in and of itself, will not cause the amendment, termination, revocation or cancellation of any material Authorization.

(c) All preclinical tests performed in connection with or as the basis for any submission to the FDA or other comparable Governmental Entity submitted by Theraclone or that Theraclone anticipates will be submitted to the FDA or other comparable Governmental Entity either (i) have been conducted in accordance, in all material respects, with applicable Good Laboratory Practice (“GLP”) requirements, including those contained in 21 C.F.R. Part 58 or (ii) involved experimental research techniques that were not required to be performed by a registered GLP testing laboratory (with appropriate notice being given to FDA or the applicable Governmental Entity, if required), but employed procedures and controls generally used by qualified experts in the conduct of preclinical studies.

(d) None of Theraclone’s product candidates (“Theraclone Products”) have received marketing approval from any Governmental Entity. All human clinical trials to the extent conducted by Theraclone or to the knowledge of Theraclone, by a third party on behalf of Theraclone has been and are being conducted in compliance with all applicable requirements of “Good Clinical Practice,” “Informed Consent” and, “Institutional Review Boards,” as those terms are defined by the FDA and in all applicable Drug Laws relating to clinical trials or the protection of human subjects, including those contained in the International Conference on Harmonization E6: Good Clinical Practices Consolidated Guideline, and in 21 C.F.R. Parts 50, 54, 56, and 312, and the provisions governing the privacy of patient medical records under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 and the implementing regulations of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, and all applicable comparable foreign Drug Laws, except for such failures to be in compliance that would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Theraclone Material Adverse Effect. Neither Theraclone nor to the knowledge of Theraclone, anyone acting on behalf of Theraclone, has received any written notice that the FDA or any other Governmental Entity or institutional review board has initiated, or threatened to initiate, any clinical hold or other action to suspend any clinical trial or suspend or terminate any IND (or foreign equivalent thereto) sponsored by Theraclone, or otherwise restrict the preclinical research on or clinical study of any Theraclone Product.

(e) All clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of Theraclone and the results of all such clinical trials have been registered and disclosed in all material respects in accordance with all applicable Drug Laws. Theraclone has filed all annual and periodic reports, amendments and IND Safety Reports required for any Theraclone Product required to be made to the FDA or any other Governmental Entity, except for such failures to file that would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Theraclone Material Adverse Effect.

(f) All manufacturing operations conducted by Theraclone or, to the knowledge of Theraclone, for the benefit of, Theraclone with respect to Theraclone Products have been and are being conducted in accordance, in all material respects, with applicable current Good Manufacturing Practices as that term is defined by the FDA and in all applicable Drug Laws, and to the knowledge of Theraclone, there are no material quality control or assurance issues with respect thereto.

(g) There are no proceedings pending or, to the knowledge of Theraclone, threatened against Theraclone with respect to (i) a violation by Theraclone of any Drug Law, or (ii) any alleged injuries to a participant in any clinical trial conducted by or on behalf of Theraclone.

(h) Theraclone has provided or made available to PharmAthene reports of all material preclinical and material clinical studies and trials conducted by Theraclone or by a third party on behalf of Theraclone regarding the efficacy and safety of its product candidates.

A-25


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(i) Theraclone has delivered or made available to PharmAthene all material correspondence and material meeting minutes received from or sent to the FDA and any other similar Governmental Entity, and all material written reports of phone conversations, visits or other contact with the FDA and any other similar Governmental Entity, relating to any Theraclone Product or to compliance with any Drug Law, including any and all notices of inspectional observations, and any other documents received by Theraclone from the FDA or comparable foreign Governmental Entities which bear in any material way on Theraclone’s compliance with regulatory requirements of the FDA or comparable foreign Governmental Entities, or on the likelihood or timing of approval of any Theraclone Product.

(j) None of Theraclone, or any officer, employee or, to the knowledge of Theraclone, agent of Theraclone has made an untrue statement of a material fact or fraudulent statement to the FDA or any other Governmental Entity, failed to disclose a material fact required to be disclosed to the FDA or any other Governmental Entity, or committed any act, made any statement, or failed to make any statement, that would reasonably be expected to provide a basis for the FDA to invoke its policy respecting “Fraud, Untrue Statements of Material Fact, Bribery, and Illegal Gratuities,” set forth in 56 Fed. Reg. 46191 (September 10, 1991). Neither Theraclone nor, to the knowledge of Theraclone, any officer, employee or agent of Theraclone has been convicted of any crime or engaged in any conduct that would reasonably be expected to result in or that has resulted in (i) debarment under 21 U.S.C. 335a or any similar state or federal Law or similar Law of a country other than the United States or (ii) exclusion from participating in the federal health care programs under 1128 of the Social Security Act or any similar state or federal Law or similar Law of a country other than the United States.

Section 3.23 Government Contracts.

(a) Theraclone has delivered or made available to PharmAthene complete and accurate copies of all Theraclone Government Contracts. Each of the Theraclone Government Contracts is valid, binding and in full force and effect, has been awarded to or novated to Theraclone, and is enforceable in accordance with its terms by Theraclone subject to the Governmental Entity’s rights, including its right to terminate each such Theraclone Government Contract for the convenience of the Governmental Entity. For the purposes of this Agreement, “Theraclone Government Contract” means any Government Contract of Theraclone, the period of performance of which has not yet expired or terminated, or expired or terminated since January 1, 2008, or for which final payment has not yet been received or has been received since January 1, 2008. For the purposes of this Agreement, “Government Contract” means any prime contract, subcontract, grant, cooperative agreement, base ordering agreement, pricing agreement, letter contract or other similar arrangement of any kind, between a person or its Subsidiaries, on the one hand, and (i) any Governmental Entity, (ii) any prime contractor of a Governmental Entity in its capacity as a prime contractor, or (iii) any subcontractor with respect to any contract of a type described in clauses (i) or (ii) above, on the other hand.

(b) Theraclone has complied in all material respects with all statutory and regulatory requirements, including the Armed Services Procurement Act, the Service Contract Act, the Procurement Integrity Act, the False Claims Act, the Buy American Act, the Trade Agreements Act, Executive Order No. 11246 and related regulations, the Truth in Negotiation Act, the Federal Procurement and Administrative Services Act, the Federal Acquisition Regulation, where and as applicable to each of the Theraclone Government Contracts or to bids or proposals for Government Contracts submitted since January 1, 2008. The representations and certifications made by Theraclone with respect to such Government Contracts were accurate in all material respects as of their effective date and, to the extent that any such certifications are on-going, Theraclone has complied with all such certifications in all material respects. No past performance evaluation received by Theraclone, if any, with respect to any such Theraclone Government Contract has set forth a default or other material failure to perform thereunder or termination thereof, or assigned a rating of less than satisfactory.

(c) With respect to the Theraclone Government Contracts, no Governmental Entity, prime contractor or higher-tier subcontractor under a Government Contract or any other person has notified Theraclone in writing of any actual or alleged material violation or breach of any statute, regulation, representation, certification, disclosure obligation, contract term, condition, clause, provision or specification by

A-26


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone that would be reasonably expected to materially affect payments under any Theraclone Government Contracts or materially adversely affect the award of Government Contracts to Theraclone in the future. Theraclone has not received any written show cause, cure, deficiency, default or similar notice relating to any Theraclone Government Contracts; and Theraclone has not received any written notice terminating in whole or in part any of the Theraclone Government Contracts for convenience or default or indicating an intent to terminate in whole or in part any of the Theraclone Government Contracts for convenience or default, or declining to exercise an option to continue performance for a subsequent period.

(d) Theraclone has not received any written or, to the knowledge of Theraclone, oral, notice of any outstanding protests challenging the award of any Theraclone Government Contract, or Claims (as the term “Claim” is defined in FAR 2.101), or contract Disputes (as the term “Disputes” is used in the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, as amended, 41 U.S.C. 601 et. seq.) to which Theraclone is a party (i) arising under or relating to the Theraclone Government Contracts and involving either a Governmental Entity, any prime contractor, any higher-tier subcontractor, vendor or any third party; and (ii) arising under or relating to any Theraclone Government Contract under the Contract Disputes Act.

(e) Neither Theraclone nor its Principals (as defined at FAR 52.209-5), nor to the knowledge of Theraclone, their respective employees have ever been, or are now, suspended, debarred or proposed for suspension or debarred from bidding on any Government Contract, nor is there any circumstance that would require an affirmative certification under FAR 52.209-5. Theraclone has not received written notice of the commencement of any suspension or debarment actions with respect to Theraclone or any of its Principals or employees, nor, to the knowledge of Theraclone, has a Governmental Entity threatened to initiate a suspension or debarment action against Theraclone or any of its officers or employees. Theraclone has not received a negative determination of responsibility issued by a Governmental Entity against Theraclone since January 1, 2008 with respect to any quotation, bid or proposal for a Government Contract submitted by Theraclone.

(f) Since July 1, 2011, (i) no amount of money due to Theraclone pertaining to any Theraclone Government Contract has been withheld or set off, nor has any claim been made against Theraclone with respect to such amounts; (ii) no Theraclone Government Contract or task order has been performed at a loss, and no facts or circumstances currently exist that would reasonably be expected to cause Theraclone to incur a loss on any Theraclone Government Contract or task order; (iii) no cost incurred by Theraclone pertaining to any Theraclone Government Contract has been formally questioned, challenged or disallowed, or to the knowledge of Theraclone, is the subject of any investigation other than pursuant to a routine audit by a Governmental Entity, and Theraclone has not received any written notice challenging, questioning, proposing for disallowance, or disallowing any costs with respect to any Theraclone Government Contract that resulted in or may result in (x) repayment of amounts by Theraclone to any of its customers or (y) reductions in amounts that would otherwise reasonably have been expected to be paid to Theraclone by any of its customers pursuant to a Theraclone Government Contract; and (iv) Theraclone’s cost accounting systems have complied in all material respects with applicable Cost Accounting Standards (as defined in FAR Chapter 99).

(g) Theraclone has submitted to the responsible Governmental Entity all forward pricing indirect cost rates to be bid, billed, and charged under Theraclone Government Contracts for the years prior to and including the fiscal year 2013 and incurred cost submissions with respect to cost reimbursable contracts for the years prior to and including the 2012 fiscal year. Within the past three years, no costs have been disallowed as expressly unallowable costs subject to penalties under FAR §31.110 and §42.709.

(h) Theraclone has not performed any activities under Theraclone Government Contracts, nor do any of them have any other relationship with any other person that could result in an “organizational conflict of interest” as defined in Subpart 9.5 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation and agency supplements thereto, and there is no organizational conflict of interest mitigation plan in effect that restricts the future business activities of Theraclone.

(i) Since January 1, 2008, Theraclone has not made any voluntary or mandatory disclosure in writing to any Governmental Entity with respect to any material alleged irregularity, misstatement or omission

A-27


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

arising under or relating to a Government Contract, and Theraclone has not failed to make any disclosure with respect to which such failure constitutes a ground for debarment.

(j) Theraclone is not required to maintain and possess facility clearances granted by any Governmental Entity to perform the Theraclone Government Contracts. Theraclone is not required to employ employees with personal security clearances to perform such Theraclone Government Contracts

(k) To the knowledge of Theraclone, none of Theraclone’s employees, consultants or agents is (or during the last three years has been) under administrative, civil or criminal investigation or indictment by any Governmental Entity with respect to the conduct of Theraclone’s business.

Section 3.24 Subsidiaries.  Theraclone has no Subsidiaries and Theraclone neither directly nor indirectly, (a) owns or otherwise controls, (b) has agreed to purchase or otherwise acquire or (c) holds any interest convertible into or exchangeable for, any capital stock or other equity interest of any other corporation, partnership, joint venture or other business association or entity.

Section 3.25 Disclosure.  No representation or warranty or other statement made by Theraclone in this Agreement, the Theraclone Disclosure Schedule, the certificates delivered pursuant to Section 7.3(d) or otherwise in connection with the transactions contemplated herein contains any untrue statement or, to Theraclone’s knowledge, omits to state a material fact necessary to make any of them, in light of the circumstances in which it was made, not misleading.

ARTICLE IV
 
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PHARMATHENE AND MERGER SUB

Except as expressly set forth in (a) (i) PharmAthene’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K, (ii) PharmAthene’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, (iii) PharmAthene’s Proxy Statements on Form DEF 14A, and (iv) PharmAthene’s Current Reports on Form 8-K, in each case filed since January 1, 2010 and in each case including exhibits thereto (other than any predictive, cautionary or forward looking disclosures contained under the captions “Risk Factors,” “Forward Looking Statements” or any similar precautionary sections and any other disclosures contained therein to the extent they are predictive, cautionary or forward looking in nature, but not to the extent that they consist of facts describing the current state of PharmAthene); or (b) the corresponding sections or subsections of the disclosure schedules delivered to Theraclone by PharmAthene in connection with this Agreement (the “PharmAthene Disclosure Schedule”) (it being agreed (x) that disclosure of any item in any section or subsection of the PharmAthene Disclosure Schedule shall also be deemed disclosure with respect to any other section or subsection of this Agreement to which the relevance of such item is reasonably apparent on the face of such disclosure and (y) the exclusion in clause (a) above shall not apply to Section 4.3), PharmAthene and Merger Sub represent and warrant to Theraclone as follows:

Section 4.1 Qualification; Organization, Subsidiaries, etc.

(a) Each of PharmAthene and Merger Sub and their respective Subsidiaries is a legal entity validly existing and in good standing under the Laws of its respective jurisdiction of organization and has all requisite corporate or similar power and authority to own, lease and operate its properties and assets and to carry on its business as presently conducted and is qualified to do business and is in good standing as a foreign corporation in each jurisdiction where the ownership, leasing or operation of its assets or properties or conduct of its business requires such qualification, except where the failure to be so qualified or in good standing, or to have such power or authority has not had and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect.

(b) PharmAthene has made available to Theraclone prior to the date of this Agreement a true and complete copy of the certificate of incorporation and bylaws or other equivalent organizational documents of PharmAthene and Merger Sub and each of their respective Subsidiaries, each as amended through the date of this Agreement. The certificate of incorporation and bylaws or similar organizational documents of PharmAthene and Merger Sub and each of their respective Subsidiaries are in full force and effect. None of PharmAthene, Merger Sub or any of their respective Subsidiaries is in violation of any provisions of its certificate of incorporation or bylaws or similar organizational documents, other than such violations as

A-28


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

have not had and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect.

(c) Section 4.1(c) of PharmAthene Disclosure Schedule lists, and PharmAthene has made available to Theraclone, accurate and complete copies of: (i) the charters of all committees of the Board of Directors of PharmAthene; (ii) any code of conduct or similar policy adopted by PharmAthene or by the Board of Directors, or any committee of the Board of Directors, of PharmAthene, each as in effect on the date hereof, and (iii) any Contracts relating to the nomination or election of PharmAthene directors (collectively, the “PharmAthene Board Charters and Policies”). PharmAthene has not taken any action in breach or violation of any of the provisions of the PharmAthene Board Charters and Policies nor is in breach or violation of any of the provisions of the PharmAthene Board Charters and Policies, except as would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect.

Section 4.2 Corporate Authority; No Violation.

(a) Each of PharmAthene and Merger Sub has the requisite corporate power and authority to enter into this Agreement and, subject to the PharmAthene Stockholder Approval, to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. The execution and delivery of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby have been duly and validly authorized by (a) the boards of directors of PharmAthene and Merger Sub, and except for (i) the PharmAthene Stockholder Approval, and the adoption (which PharmAthene shall cause to occur immediately following the execution and delivery of this Agreement) of this Agreement by PharmAthene, in its capacity as the sole stockholder of Merger Sub, (ii) the filing of the Certificate of Merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware in respect of the Merger and (iii) any consents, authorizations, approvals, filings or exceptions in connections with compliance with the rules of NYSE MKT LLC with respect to the Merger and the PharmAthene Common Stock to be issued pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, no other corporate proceedings on the part of PharmAthene and Merger Sub are necessary to authorize this Agreement or the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby. The PharmAthene Board of Directors, at a meeting duly called and held, has by unanimous vote of all of its members duly adopted resolutions (1) determining that it is in the best interests of PharmAthene and its stockholders, and declared it advisable, to enter into this Agreement and the PharmAthene Charter Amendment, (2) approving this Agreement and the PharmAthene Charter Amendment and authorizing the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, the PharmAthene Charter Amendment and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, including the Merger and the PharmAthene Charter Amendment, (3) directing that the PharmAthene Stockholder Approval Matters be submitted to a vote at a meeting of stockholders of PharmAthene and (4) recommending that stockholders of PharmAthene vote in favor of the PharmAthene Stockholder Approval Matters (the item set forth in clause (4) of this sentence, the “PharmAthene Recommendation”). This Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered by PharmAthene and Merger Sub and, assuming this Agreement constitutes the valid and binding agreement of Theraclone, this Agreement constitutes the valid and binding agreement of PharmAthene and Merger Sub, enforceable against each of PharmAthene and Merger Sub in accordance with its terms.

(b) Subject to the accuracy of the representations and warranties of Theraclone in Section 3.3(b), no authorization, consent, permit, action or approval of, or filing with, or notification to, any Governmental Entity is necessary, under applicable Law, for the consummation by PharmAthene or Merger Sub or any of their respective Subsidiaries of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, except for such authorizations, consents, permits, actions, approvals, notifications or filings required under (i) the DGCL, (ii) the Securities Act, and (iii) the Exchange Act, and except for such authorizations, consents, permits, actions, approvals, notifications or filings that, if not obtained or made, would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect.

(c) The execution and delivery by PharmAthene and Merger Sub of this Agreement do not, and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and compliance with the provisions of this Agreement will not (i) result in any violation of, or default (with or without notice or lapse of time, or both) under, or give rise to a right of termination, amendment, cancellation or acceleration of any

A-29


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

obligation or to the loss of a benefit under, any Contract to which PharmAthene, Merger Sub or any of their respective Subsidiaries is a party or any of their respective properties or other assets is subject, (ii) conflict with or result in any violation of any provision of the certificate of incorporation or bylaws or other equivalent organizational document, in each case as amended, of PharmAthene or Merger Sub or (iii) conflict with or violate any applicable Laws, other than, in the case of clauses (i) and (iii), any such violation, conflict, default, termination, amendment, cancellation, acceleration, right or loss that has not had and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect.

Section 4.3 Capital Stock.

(a) The authorized capital stock of PharmAthene consists of 100,000,000 shares of common stock with $0.0001 par value (“PharmAthene Common Stock”). As of July 26, 2013, (i) 52,310,913 shares of PharmAthene Common Stock were issued, which number includes (A) 52,310,913 shares of PharmAthene Common Stock issued and outstanding and (B) no shares of PharmAthene Common Stock held in treasury, (ii) 6,013,761 shares of PharmAthene Common Stock were reserved for issuance and issuable or otherwise deliverable under the PharmAthene, Inc. 2007 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the “PharmAthene Stock Incentive Plan”), and (iii) 5,620,128 shares of PharmAthene Common Stock were reserved for issuance under warrants. All outstanding shares of PharmAthene Common Stock, and all shares of PharmAthene Common Stock reserved for issuance as noted in the immediately preceding clause (ii), when issued in accordance with the respective terms thereof, are or will be duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable and not issued in violation of any preemptive rights, purchase option, call or right of first refusal rights.

(b) As of the date hereof, the authorized capital stock of Merger Sub consists of 1,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of which 100 are validly issued and outstanding and all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Merger Sub is, and until the Effective Time will be, owned by PharmAthene. Merger Sub will not have outstanding any option, warrant, right, or any other agreement pursuant to which any person may acquire any equity security of Merger Sub. Merger Sub has not conducted any business prior to the date of this Agreement and prior to the Effective Time, will have no assets, liabilities or obligations of any nature other than those incident to its formation and pursuant to this Agreement and the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

(c) Except as set forth in subsection (a) above, as of the date of this Agreement, (i) PharmAthene does not have any shares of its capital stock issued or outstanding other than shares of PharmAthene Common Stock that have become outstanding after July 26, 2013, and were reserved for issuance as set forth in subsection (a) above and (ii) there are no outstanding subscriptions, options, stock appreciation rights, warrants, calls, convertible securities, restricted stock units, performance units, deferred stock units or other similar rights, agreements or commitments relating to the issuance of capital stock or voting securities to which PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries is a party obligating PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries to (A) issue, transfer or sell any shares of capital stock or other equity interests of PharmAthene or any Subsidiary of PharmAthene or securities convertible into or exchangeable for such shares or equity interests, (B) grant, extend or enter into any such subscription, option, stock appreciation right, warrant, call, convertible securities, restricted stock units, performance units, deferred stock units or other similar right, agreement or arrangement, (C) redeem or otherwise acquire, or vote or dispose of, any such shares of capital stock or other equity interests or (D) provide a material amount of funds to, or make any material investment (in the form of a loan, capital contribution or otherwise) in, any Subsidiary of PharmAthene.

(d) Except as set forth in subsection (a) above, neither PharmAthene nor any of its Subsidiaries has outstanding any bonds, debentures, notes or other obligations the holders of which have the right to vote (or are convertible into or exercisable for securities having the right to vote) with stockholders of PharmAthene on any matter.

(e) There are no voting trusts, proxies or other agreements or understandings to which PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries is a party with respect to the voting of the capital stock or other equity interests of PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries.

A-30


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(f) All outstanding shares of capital stock of, or other equity interests in, each Subsidiary of PharmAthene are duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable and were not issued in violation of any preemptive or similar rights, purchase option, call or right of first refusal rights. All the outstanding shares of capital stock of, or other equity interests in, each Subsidiary of PharmAthene that are owned by PharmAthene or a Subsidiary of PharmAthene are free and clear of all Liens other than Permitted Liens.

(g) The PharmAthene Common Stock to be issued in the Merger will, when issued in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

Section 4.4 Reports and Financial Statements.

(a) PharmAthene has filed or furnished all forms, documents and reports required to be filed or furnished since January 1, 2008 by it with the SEC (the “PharmAthene SEC Documents”). As of their respective dates, or, if amended, as of the date of the last such amendment (excluding any amendments made after the date of this Agreement), the PharmAthene SEC Documents complied in all material respects with the requirements of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, as the case may be, and the applicable rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and none of the PharmAthene SEC Documents contained any untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. To the knowledge of PharmAthene, none of the PharmAthene SEC Documents is the subject of any outstanding SEC comments or outstanding SEC investigation. No Subsidiary of PharmAthene is required to file any form or report with the SEC. PharmAthene has made available to Theraclone all material correspondence (if such correspondence has occurred since January 1, 2008) between the SEC on the one hand, and PharmAthene and any of its Subsidiaries, on the other hand received by PharmAthene prior to the date of this Agreement. The certifications and statements required by (A) Rule 13a-14 under the Exchange Act and (B) 18 U.S.C. §1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act) relating to the PharmAthene SEC Documents (collectively, the “Certifications”) are accurate and complete and comply as to form and content with all applicable Law. As used in this Section 4.4, the term “file” and variations thereof shall be broadly construed to include any manner in which a document or information is furnished, supplied or otherwise made available to the SEC.

(b) The consolidated financial statements (including all related notes and schedules) of PharmAthene included in PharmAthene SEC Documents fairly present in all material respects the consolidated financial position of PharmAthene and its consolidated Subsidiaries, as at the respective dates thereof, and the consolidated results of their operations and their consolidated cash flows for the respective periods then ended (subject, in the case of the unaudited statements, to normal year-end audit adjustments and to any other adjustments described therein, including the notes thereto) in each case in accordance with GAAP (except, in the case of the unaudited statements, as permitted by the SEC) applied on a consistent basis during the periods involved (except as may be indicated therein or in the notes thereto).

(c) Except as noted in Section 4.4(c) of the PharmAthene Disclosure Schedule, PharmAthene is in compliance with all applicable NYSE MKT LLC listing rules and requirements and continued listing standards, and, to PharmAthene’s knowledge, there are no facts that cause or could reasonably be expected to cause PharmAthene to be non-compliant with any applicable NYSE MKT LLC listing rules and requirements and continued listing standards.

(d) PharmAthene auditor has at all times since the date of enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act been: (i) a registered public accounting firm (as defined in Section 2(a)(12) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act); (ii) to the knowledge of the PharmAthene, “independent” with respect to the PharmAthene within the meaning of Regulation S-X under the Exchange Act; and (iii) to the knowledge of the PharmAthene, in compliance with subsections (g) through (l) of Section 10A of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board thereunder.

(e) Since January 1, 2008, there have been no formal internal investigations regarding financial reporting or accounting policies and practices discussed with, reviewed by or initiated at the direction of the chief executive officer or chief financial officer of PharmAthene, the Board of Directors of

A-31


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PharmAthene or any committee thereof, other than ordinary course audits or reviews of accounting policies and practices or internal controls required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Since January 1, 2008, neither PharmAthene nor its independent auditors have identified (i) any significant deficiency or material weakness in the system of internal accounting controls utilized by PharmAthene, (ii) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves PharmAthene’s management or other employees who have a role in the preparation of financial statements or the internal accounting controls utilized by PharmAthene or (iii) any claim or allegation regarding any of the foregoing.

Section 4.5 Internal Controls and Procedures.  PharmAthene has established and maintains disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting (as such terms are defined in paragraphs (e) and (f), respectively, of Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act) as required by Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act. PharmAthene’s disclosure controls and procedures are reasonably designed to provide reasonable assurance that all material information required to be disclosed by PharmAthene in the reports that it files or furnishes under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and that all such material information is accumulated and communicated to PharmAthene’s management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and to make the certifications required pursuant to sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. PharmAthene’s management has completed assessment of the effectiveness of PharmAthene’s internal control over financial reporting in compliance with the requirements of 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for the year ended December 30, 2012, and such assessment concluded that such controls were effective. PharmAthene has disclosed, based on its most recent evaluation prior to the date of this Agreement, to PharmAthene’s auditors and the audit committee of the PharmAthene Board of Directors and to Theraclone (A) any significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect in any material respect PharmAthene’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information and (B) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves executive officers or employees who have a significant role in PharmAthene’s internal controls over financial reporting. As of the date of this Agreement, to the knowledge of PharmAthene, PharmAthene has not identified any significant deficiencies or any material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting. There are no outstanding loans made by PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries to any executive officer (as defined in Rule 3b-7 under the Exchange Act) or director of PharmAthene.

Section 4.6 No Undisclosed Liabilities.  Except (a) as reflected or reserved against in PharmAthene’s consolidated balance sheets (or the notes thereto) included in the PharmAthene SEC Documents, (b) as are incurred after the date of this Agreement and are permitted to be incurred by this Agreement or are incurred as a result of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement (e.g., attorneys’ fees), (c) for liabilities and obligations incurred in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice since December 31, 2012, that would not reasonably be expected, individually or in the aggregate, to have a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect and (d) liabilities or obligations that have been discharged or paid in full in the ordinary course of business, as of the date of this Agreement, neither PharmAthene nor any Subsidiary of PharmAthene have and since March 31, 2013 have not incurred any liabilities or obligations of any nature whatsoever, whether or not accrued, absolute, matured, determined, contingent or otherwise, and whether or not required by GAAP to be reflected on a consolidated balance sheet of PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries (or in the notes thereto), other than those that have not had and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect.

Section 4.7 Compliance with Law; Permits.

(a) PharmAthene and each of its Subsidiaries are, and at all times since January 1, 2008 have been, in compliance with and not in default under or in violation of Law, except (i) with respect to any Drug Laws, which are addressed in Section 4.21 and (ii) for any such non-compliance, default or violation that would not, reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect.

(b) PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries are in possession of all franchises, grants, authorizations, licenses, permits, easements, variances, exceptions, consents, certificates, approvals and orders of any Governmental Entity necessary for PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries to own, lease and operate their

A-32


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

properties and assets or to carry on their businesses as they are now being conducted (the “PharmAthene Permits”), except for any failure to have any of the PharmAthene Permits that have not had and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect. All PharmAthene Permits are in full force and effect, except for any failure to be in full force and effect that has not had and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect.

Section 4.8 Environmental Laws and Regulations.  Except as has not had and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect, (i) PharmAthene has conducted its businesses in compliance with all applicable Environmental Laws, (ii) to the knowledge of PharmAthene, none of the properties leased or operated by PharmAthene contains any Hazardous Substance in amounts which would reasonably be expected to give rise to liability under Environmental Laws, (iii) since January 1, 2008, PharmAthene has not received any written notice, demand letter or written request for information from any Governmental Entity indicating that PharmAthene or any person whose liability PharmAthene has retained or assumed, either contractually or by operation of law, may be in violation of, or liable under, any Environmental Law, (iv) to the knowledge of PharmAthene, no Hazardous Substance has been disposed of, released or transported in violation of any applicable Environmental Law, or in a manner which has given rise to any liability under Environmental Law, from any properties presently or formerly owned, leased or operated by PharmAthene or any other property and (v) neither PharmAthene nor any of its properties or any person whose liability PharmAthene has retained or assumed, either contractually or by operation of law, is subject to any liabilities relating to any pending or, to the knowledge of PharmAthene, threatened suit, settlement, court order, administrative order, regulatory requirement, judgment or written claim asserted or arising under any Environmental Law.

Section 4.9 Employee Benefit Plans.

(a) Section 4.9(a) of the PharmAthene Disclosure Schedule sets forth a true and complete list of each benefit plan, arrangement, agreement, program, practice, and policy, including each employee welfare benefit plan (including post-retirement health and insurance plan) within the meaning of section 3(1) of ERISA, each employee pension benefit plan within the meaning of section 3(2) of ERISA, and each bonus, incentive, deferred compensation, profit-sharing, savings, retirement, vacation, sick leave, share purchase, incentive compensation, equity or equity-based, severance, retention, employment (other than employment agreements that are terminable at-will without notice or without liability), consulting, change of control, fringe benefit, and employee loan plan, arrangement, agreement, program, practice, and policy, whether written or unwritten (the “PharmAthene Benefit Plans”), in each case that is sponsored, maintained, or contributed to, or required to be maintained or contributed to, by PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries, or to which PharmAthene or any person or entity that, together with PharmAthene, is treated as a single employer under section 414 of the Code (a “PharmAthene Commonly Controlled Entity”), has any direct or indirect liability, contingent or otherwise, for the benefit of any current or former director, officer, employee, consultant, or independent contractor of PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries.

(b) With respect to each material PharmAthene Benefit Plan, PharmAthene has made available to Theraclone complete and accurate copies of each of the following documents, as applicable: (i) such written PharmAthene Benefit Plan (including all amendments thereto) or a written description of any such PharmAthene Benefit Plan that is not otherwise in writing, (ii) the three most recent Annual Reports on IRS Form 5500 Series and accompanying schedules, if any, (iii) the most recent actuarial valuation report required to be filed under ERISA or required pursuant to applicable Laws or the terms of such PharmAthene Benefit Plan, (iv) a copy of the most recent SPD, together with all summaries of material modifications issued with respect to such SPD, if required under ERISA or required pursuant to applicable Laws or the terms of such PharmAthene Benefit Plan, (v) if such PharmAthene Benefit Plan is funded through a trust or any other funding vehicle, a copy of the trust or other funding agreement (including all material amendments thereto) and the latest financial statements thereof, if any, (vi) all contracts relating to such PharmAthene Benefit Plan with respect to which PharmAthene, any of its Subsidiaries, or any PharmAthene Commonly Controlled Entity may have any material liability, including insurance contracts, investment management agreements, subscription and participation agreements and record keeping

A-33


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

agreements, (vii) the most recent determination letter received from (or determination letter request submitted to) the IRS or the most recent master or prototype opinion letter issued by the IRS with respect to a master or prototype plan adopted by PharmAthene or any PharmAthene Commonly Controlled Entity upon which such sponsor is entitled to rely (if applicable) with respect to any PharmAthene Benefit Plan that is intended to be qualified under section 401(a) of the Code and (viii) communications (other than routine communications) from the IRS, the Department of Labor or the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation or any successor thereto with respect to any such PharmAthene Benefit Plan.

(c) (i) Each of the PharmAthene Benefit Plans (and any related trust or other funding vehicle) has been established and administered in compliance in all material respects with its terms and applicable Laws, including, but not limited to, ERISA and the Code and in each case the regulations thereunder and (ii) with respect to each of the PharmAthene Benefit Plans intended to be “qualified” within the meaning of section 401(a) of the Code, either the IRS has issued a favorable determination or opinion letter that has not been revoked, or an application for a favorable determination or opinion letter was timely submitted to the IRS for which no final action has been taken by the IRS, or the plan is relying on a prototype or volume submitter letter, and, to the knowledge of PharmAthene there are no existing circumstances or events that have occurred that could reasonably be expected to adversely affect the qualified status of any such plan.

(d) Neither PharmAthene, any of its Subsidiaries, nor any PharmAthene Commonly Controlled Entity has during the period beginning with the sixth plan year preceding the plan year that includes the Effective Time ever sponsored, maintained, contributed to, or been required to maintain or contribute to, or has any actual or contingent liability under any employee benefit plan subject to Title IV or section 302 of ERISA or sections 412 or 4971 of the Code, or any “multiemployer pension plan” (as such term is defined in section 3(37) of ERISA), and neither PharmAthene nor any PharmAthene Commonly Controlled Entity has incurred any withdrawal liability which remains unsatisfied, and to the knowledge of PharmAthene, no events have occurred and no circumstances exist that could reasonably be expected to result in any such liability to PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries.

(e) All material contributions and other amounts payable by PharmAthene or its Subsidiaries as of the date of this Agreement with respect to each PharmAthene Benefit Plan in respect of any plan year during the period beginning with the sixth plan year preceding the plan year that includes the Effective Time have been paid or, if not yet due have been properly accrued in accordance with GAAP in all material respects. Neither PharmAthene nor any of its Subsidiaries has engaged in a transaction in connection with which PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries became, or could reasonably be expected to become, subject to either a material civil penalty assessed pursuant to sections 409 or 502(i) of ERISA or a material Tax imposed pursuant to sections 4975 or 4976 of the Code. There are no material pending or, to the knowledge of PharmAthene, threatened claims (other than routine claims for benefits) by, on behalf of or against any of the PharmAthene Benefit Plans or any trusts related thereto.

(f) Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby (either alone or in conjunction with any other event, including any termination of employment at or following the Effective Time) will (i) cause any material payment (including, without limitation, severance, unemployment compensation, change in control payment, “excess parachute payment” (within the meaning of section 280G of the Code), forgiveness of indebtedness, or other compensation or benefits) to become due to any current or former director, officer, employee, consultant, or independent contractor of PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries from PharmAthene or any PharmAthene Commonly Controlled Entity under any PharmAthene Benefit Plan or otherwise (other than amounts payable to any such person in his or her capacity as an equityholder of PharmAthene), (ii) materially increase any benefits otherwise payable under any PharmAthene Benefit Plan, (iii) result in any acceleration of the time of payment or vesting of any such benefits, (iv) require the funding of any such benefits, (v) result in any breach or violation of or default under, or limit (except as may be specifically set forth in this Agreement) PharmAthene’s right to amend, modify, or terminate any collective bargaining agreement or PharmAthene Benefit Plan, or (vi) result in the payment of any amount that would, individually or in combination with any other such payment, not be deductible as a result of section 280G of the Code. Section 4.9(f) of the PharmAthene Disclosure Schedule sets forth, as of the

A-34


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

date hereof, individuals the Company reasonably believes are “disqualified individuals” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code and the Regulations thereunder.

(g) All PharmAthene Stock Options have an exercise price per share that was not less than the “fair market value” of one share of PharmAthene Common Stock on the date of grant. All PharmAthene Stock Options have been properly accounted for in accordance with GAAP in all material respects, and no change is expected in respect of any prior financial statements relating to expenses for stock-based compensation. There is no pending audit, investigation or inquiry by any Governmental Entity or by PharmAthene (directly or indirectly) with respect to PharmAthene Stock Option granting practices or other equity compensation practices. The grant date of each PharmAthene Stock Option is on or after the date on which such grant was authorized by PharmAthene board of directors or the compensation committee thereof.

(h) Each PharmAthene Benefit Plan that is a “nonqualified deferred compensation plan” (as defined in section 409A(d)(1) of the Code) subject to section 409A of the Code has been operated since January 1, 2005 in good faith compliance with section 409A of the Code and the regulations and guidance promulgated thereunder.

(i) No PharmAthene Benefit Plan provides benefits, including death or medical, health, or other welfare benefits (whether or not insured), with respect to current or former directors, officers, employees, consultants, or independent contractors of PharmAthene, its Subsidiaries, or any PharmAthene Commonly Controlled Entity after retirement or other termination of service other than (i) coverage mandated by applicable Laws (including continuation coverage under section 4980B of the Code), (ii) death benefits or retirement benefits under any “employee pension benefit plan,” as such term is defined in section 3(2) of ERISA, (iii) deferred compensation benefits accrued as liabilities on the books of PharmAthene, any of its Subsidiaries, or a PharmAthene Commonly Controlled Entity or (iv) benefits the full direct cost of which is borne by the current or former employee (or beneficiary thereof), and no circumstances exist that would reasonably be expected to cause PharmAthene, any of its Subsidiaries, or a PharmAthene Commonly Controlled Entity to become obligated to provide any such benefits.

(j) Except as set forth in Schedule 4.9(j) of the PharmAthene Disclosure Schedule, no PharmAthene Benefit Plan is subject to the laws of any jurisdiction outside of the United States.

Section 4.10 Absence of Certain Changes or Events.  From March 31, 2013 to the date hereof, (i) the businesses of PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries have been conducted in all material respects in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice and (ii) there has not been any change, effect, event, development, occurrence or state of facts that has had, or would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect.

Section 4.11 Investigations; Litigation.  Except with respect to any Drug Laws, which are addressed in Section 4.21(a), and as disclosed on Schedule 4.11, there are no (a) investigations or reviews pending (or, to the knowledge of PharmAthene, threatened) by any Governmental Entity with respect to PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries nor (b) any actions, suits, arbitrations, mediations, or proceedings pending (or, to PharmAthene’s knowledge, threatened) against PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries, or any of their respective properties at law or in equity before, and there are no orders, judgments or decrees of, or before, any Governmental Entity, in the case of each of clause (a) or (b), which have had or would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect.

Section 4.12 Proxy Statement; Other Information.  Assuming the accuracy of the representations made by Theraclone in Section 3.11, the Proxy Statement will not, at the time of the mailing of the Proxy Statement or any amendments or supplements thereto or at the time of the PharmAthene Meeting, contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. Assuming the accuracy of the representations made by Theraclone in Section 3.11, the Form S-4 Registration Statement will not, at the time the Form S-4 Registration Statement is filed with the SEC or at the time it becomes effective under the Securities Act, contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any

A-35


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.

Section 4.13 Tax Matters.

(a) (i) PharmAthene and each of its Subsidiaries have prepared in material compliance with the prescribed manner and filed within the time required by applicable Law (taking into account any extension of time within which to file) all material Tax Returns required to be filed by any of them with all relevant Governmental Entities for all taxation or fiscal periods ending prior to the date hereof, and all such Tax Returns are true, correct and complete in all material respects, (ii) PharmAthene and each of its Subsidiaries have fully and timely paid all material Taxes shown thereon as owing and all material Taxes otherwise owed by or with respect to PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries within the time required by applicable Law, (iii) the financial statements included in the PharmAthene SEC Documents reflect adequate reserves for all material unpaid Taxes payable by PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries for all taxable periods and portions thereof through the date of such financial statements and neither PharmAthene nor any of its Subsidiaries has incurred any material Tax liability since the date of such financial statements other than for Taxes arising in the ordinary course of business and (iv) as of the date of this Agreement, there are not pending or, to the knowledge of PharmAthene, threatened, any audits, examinations, assessments, reassessments or other proceedings in respect of Taxes (except, in the case of clause (i), (ii) or (iv) above, with respect to matters contested in good faith and for which adequate reserves have been established in accordance with GAAP).

(b) There are no waivers of any statute of limitations in respect of assessment or collection of Taxes or any agreements or requests for an extension of time for assessment or collection of any Tax, which waiver or extension is currently effective.

(c) None of PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries is a party to any agreement relating to Tax allocation, Tax indemnification or Tax sharing (other than any such agreements solely among PharmAthene and any of its Subsidiaries) and none of PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries has any liability for Taxes of any person (other than members of the affiliated group, within the meaning of section 1504(a) of the Code, filing consolidated federal income tax returns of which PharmAthene is the common parent) under Treasury Regulation section 1.1502-6, Treasury Regulation section 1.1502-78 or any similar state, local or non-U.S. Laws, as a transferee or successor, or otherwise.

(d) No claim in writing has been made against PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries by any Governmental Entity in a jurisdiction where PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries do not file Tax Returns that PharmAthene or such Subsidiary is or may be subject to taxation by that jurisdiction. All deficiencies for Taxes asserted or assessed in writing against PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries have been fully and timely paid, settled or properly reflected in the most recent financial statements contained in the PharmAthene SEC Documents.

(e) PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries have made available to Theraclone correct and complete copies of all material U.S. federal income Tax Returns, state income Tax apportionment data, examination reports and statements of deficiencies for which the applicable statutory periods of limitations have not yet expired.

(f) There are no material Liens for Taxes upon any of the assets of PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries, except for Permitted Liens.

(g) PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries have each withheld from their respective employees, independent contractors, creditors, stockholders and third parties, and timely paid or remitted to the appropriate Governmental Entity, proper and accurate amounts in all material respects for all periods ending on or before the Closing Date in compliance with all material Tax withholding and remitting provisions of applicable Law.

(h) Neither PharmAthene nor any of its Subsidiaries has constituted a “distributing corporation” or a “controlled corporation” (within the meaning of section 355(a)(1)(A) of the Code) in a distribution that

A-36


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

could constitute part of a “plan” or “series of related transactions” (within the meaning of section 355(e) of the Code) in conjunction with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

(i) Each of the closing agreements under section 7121 of the Code or any similar provision of state, local or non-U.S. Laws or full acceptance letters which PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries has executed, entered into or received is valid and enforceable in accordance with its terms. Neither PharmAthene nor any of its Subsidiaries has committed fraud, collusion, concealment or malfeasance or made a misrepresentation of material fact in connection with the execution or entering into of any closing agreement with, or the receipt of any full acceptance letter or private letter ruling from, any Governmental Entity.

(j) There is no taxable income of PharmAthene that will be required under any applicable Law to be reported in a taxable period beginning after the Closing Date which taxable income was realized (or reflects economic income) arising prior to the Closing Date as a result of any: (i) change in method of accounting for a taxable period ending on or prior to the Closing Date; (ii) “closing agreement” as described in section 7121 of the Code executed on or prior to the Closing Date; (iii) installment sale or open transaction disposition made on or prior to the Closing Date; or (iv) election under section 108(i) of the Code.

(k) Neither PharmAthene nor any of its Subsidiaries has ever participated in any reportable transaction within the meaning of Treasury Regulations section 1.6011-4(b) or taken any position on any Tax Return that would subject it to a substantial understatement of Tax penalty under section 6662 of the Code which has not been properly disclosed to the IRS as required by the Code and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder.

(l) Neither PharmAthene nor any of its Subsidiaries has (A) been a “United States real property holding corporation,” as defined in section 897(c)(2) of the Code, at any time during the past five years or made an election under section 897(i) of the Code to be treated as a domestic corporation for purposes of sections 897, 1445 and 6039C of the Code or (B) been a passive foreign investment company within the meaning of section 1297 of the Code.

(m) All related party transactions involving PharmAthene and its subsidiaries have been conducted at arm’s length and in compliance with section 482 of the Code and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder and any comparable provision of any state, local, or non-U.S. tax law.

(n) Neither PharmAthene nor any of its Subsidiaries has any knowledge of any fact, agreement, plan or other circumstance that would cause the Merger to fail to qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of section 368(a) of the Code.

(o) No employee, director, consultant or other service provider of PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries is entitled to receive any gross up payment from PharmAthene or any of its subsidiaries by reason of any taxes imposed by Section 4999 of the Code.

Section 4.14 Employee Relations Matters.

(a) Neither PharmAthene nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to, or bound by, any collective bargaining agreement, contract or other agreement or understanding with a labor union, labor organization, trade union or works council. Neither PharmAthene nor any of its Subsidiaries has committed any material unfair labor practice as defined in the National Labor Relations Act or other applicable Laws. To the knowledge of PharmAthene, there are no organizational efforts with respect to the formation of a collective bargaining unit or, as of the date of this Agreement, labor union organizing activities being made or threatened involving employees of PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries.

(b) There are no pending or, to the knowledge of PharmAthene, threatened arbitrations, grievances, labor disputes, strikes, lockouts, slowdowns or work stoppages against PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries, nor to the knowledge of PharmAthene, has there been any of the foregoing that has had, or would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect.

A-37


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(c) PharmAthene and each of its Subsidiaries are and have been in compliance in all material respects with all applicable Laws respecting employment and employment practices, including all Laws respecting terms and conditions of employment, health and safety, wages and hours, child labor, immigration, employment discrimination, disability rights or benefits, equal opportunity, plant closures and layoffs, affirmative action, workers’ compensation, labor relations, employee leave issues, employee classifications, and unemployment insurance. PharmAthene and each of its Subsidiaries are not in any material respect delinquent in payments to any employees or former employees for any services or amounts required to be reimbursed or otherwise paid. Neither PharmAthene nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to, or otherwise bound by, any order of any Governmental Entity relating to employees or employment practices other than any ordinary course settlement with a Governmental Entity, in each case in an amount not more than $100,000 individually.

(d) Neither PharmAthene nor any of its Subsidiaries has received written notice of (i) any unfair labor practice charge or complaint pending or threatened before the National Labor Relations Board or any other Governmental Entity against it, (ii) any complaints, grievances or arbitrations against it arising out of any collective bargaining agreement, (iii) any charge or complaint with respect to or relating to it pending before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or any other Governmental Entity responsible for the prevention of unlawful employment practices, (iv) the intent of any Governmental Entity responsible for the enforcement of labor, employment, wages and hours of work, child labor, immigration, or occupational safety and health Laws to conduct an investigation with respect to or relating to them or such investigation is in progress or (v) any complaint, lawsuit or other proceeding pending or, to the knowledge of PharmAthene, threatened in any forum by or on behalf of any present or former employee of such entities, any applicant for employment or classes of the foregoing alleging breach of any express or implied contract of employment, any applicable Law governing employment or the termination thereof or other discriminatory, wrongful or tortious conduct in connection with the employment relationship, in each case, which has had or would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect.

(e) Neither PharmAthene nor any of its Subsidiaries is currently engaged in any layoffs or employment terminations sufficient in number to trigger application of the WARN or any similar state, local or foreign Law. During the ninety (90) day period prior to the date of this Agreement, not more than thirty (30) employees of PharmAthene or its Subsidiaries were terminated from any single site of employment.

(f) As of the date of this Agreement, no PharmAthene Key Employee or any of its Subsidiaries has given written notice terminating employment with PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries, which termination will be effective on or after the date of this Agreement. For the purposes hereof (“PharmAthene Key Employee”) means the persons set forth in Section 4.14(f) of the PharmAthene Disclosure Schedule.

Section 4.15 Intellectual Property.

(a) To the knowledge of PharmAthene, PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries own, license, sublicense or otherwise possess legally enforceable rights to use all Intellectual Property material to the conduct of the business of PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, as currently conducted and as currently proposed to be conducted (in each case excluding generally commercially available, off-the-shelf software programs). PharmAthene’s public filings described in the preamble to this Article IV set forth all of the PharmAthene’s research and development programs and any other material programs.

(b) The execution and delivery of this Agreement by PharmAthene and the consummation of the Merger will not result in the breach of or loss of rights under, or create on behalf of any third party the right to terminate or modify, (i) any license, sublicense or other agreement relating to any Intellectual Property owned by PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries under which PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries has granted an exclusive license or which is otherwise material to the business of PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, as currently conducted and as currently proposed to be conducted (the “ PharmAthene Intellectual Property”), or (ii) any license, sublicense or other agreement to which PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries is a party and pursuant to which

A-38


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries is authorized to use any third party’s Intellectual Property on an exclusive basis or that is otherwise material to the business of PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, as currently conducted and as currently proposed to be conducted, excluding generally commercially available, off-the-shelf software programs (the “PharmAthene Third Party Intellectual Property”). The execution and delivery of this Agreement by PharmAthene and the consummation of the Merger will not, as a result of any contract to which PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries is a party, result in PharmAthene, PharmAthene or any of PharmAthene’s Subsidiaries granting to any third party any rights or licenses to any Intellectual Property or the release or disclosure of any trade secrets that would not have been granted or released absent such execution or consummation.

(c) Section 4.15(c) of the PharmAthene Disclosure Schedule sets forth a complete and accurate list of all U.S. and foreign issued patents and pending patent applications and registered trademarks, service marks, copyrights and domain names owned or co-owned by PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries material to the conduct of the business of PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, as currently conducted and as currently proposed to be conducted. Section 4.15(c) of the PharmAthene Disclosure Schedule sets forth a complete and accurate list of all U.S. and foreign issued patents and pending patent applications and registered trademarks, service marks, copyrights and domain names material to the conduct of the business of PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, as currently conducted and as currently proposed to be conducted, licensed to PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries, and Section 4.15(c) of the PharmAthene Disclosure Schedule sets forth a complete and accurate list of all other licenses to PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries of PharmAthene Intellectual Property or PharmAthene Third Party Intellectual Property.

(d) To the knowledge of PharmAthene, all items of Intellectual Property set forth in Section 4.15(c) of the PharmAthene Disclosure Schedule are subsisting and have not expired or been cancelled, all maintenance and renewal fees necessary to preserve such rights have been paid, and all such rights (other than such rights that are currently the subject of pending applications) are valid. PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries have implemented commercially reasonable measures to maintain the confidentiality of PharmAthene Intellectual Property of a nature that PharmAthene intends to keep confidential. To the knowledge of PharmAthene, no third party is infringing, violating or misappropriating any of the PharmAthene Intellectual Property or PharmAthene Third Party Intellectual Property, except for infringements, violations or misappropriations that, individually or in the aggregate, have not had, and would not be reasonably likely to have, a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect.

(e) To the knowledge of PharmAthene, the conduct of the business of PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries as currently conducted and as currently proposed to be conducted does not infringe, violate, conflict with or constitute a misappropriation of any Intellectual Property of any third party. Since January 1, 2008, neither PharmAthene nor any of its Subsidiaries has received any written claim or notice alleging any such infringement, violation or misappropriation.

(f) All former and current employees, consultants and contractors of PharmAthene or its Subsidiaries who contribute or have contributed to the creation or development of any Intellectual Property for or on behalf of PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries material to the conduct of the business of PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, as currently conducted and as currently proposed to be conducted, have executed written instruments that assign to PharmAthene or the relevant Subsidiary all right, title and interest in and to any such contributions.

(g) PharmAthene’s and each of its Subsidiaries’ collection, storage, use and dissemination of personally identifiable information is and since January 1, 2008, has been in compliance in all material respects with all applicable Law, including Laws relating to privacy, data security and data protection, and all applicable privacy policies and terms of use or other contractual obligations applicable thereto. Since January 1, 2008, there have been no written allegations or claims received by PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries from any Governmental Entity or any person of a breach of any such Laws, policies or obligations. To the knowledge of PharmAthene, since January 1, 2008, there have been no material losses or thefts of any such information.

A-39


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section 4.16 Real Property.

(a) Neither PharmAthene nor any Subsidiary of PharmAthene owns any real property.

(b) PharmAthene or a Subsidiary of PharmAthene has a good leasehold estate in each Real Property Leases, under which PharmAthene or a Subsidiary of PharmAthene is a tenant or a subtenant, in each case free and clear of all Liens and defects in title, other than Permitted Liens. Neither PharmAthene nor any Subsidiary of PharmAthene is in breach of or default under the terms of any Real Property Lease, except for any such breach or default that has not had and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect. To the knowledge of PharmAthene, no other party to any Real Property Lease is in breach of or default under the terms of any Real Property Lease, which breach or default has had or would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect. Each Real Property Lease is a valid and binding obligation of PharmAthene or the Subsidiary of PharmAthene which is party thereto and, to the knowledge of PharmAthene, of each other party thereto, and is in full force and effect, except that (i) such enforcement may be subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other similar Laws, now or hereafter in effect, relating to creditors’ rights generally and (ii) equitable remedies of specific performance and injunctive and other forms of equitable relief may be subject to equitable defenses and to the discretion of the court before which any proceeding therefor may be brought.

(c) PharmAthene’s public filings described in the preamble to this Article IV set forth, as of the date of this Agreement, a true and complete list of all leases, subleases or similar agreements under which PharmAthene or a Subsidiary of PharmAthene is the landlord or the sublandlord (such leases, subleases and similar agreements, collectively, the “PharmAthene Real Property Subleases”). Neither PharmAthene nor any Subsidiary of PharmAthene is in breach of or default under the terms of any PharmAthene Real Property Sublease, except for any such breach or default that has not had and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect. To the knowledge of PharmAthene, no other party to any PharmAthene Real Property Sublease is in breach of or default under the terms of any PharmAthene Real Property Sublease except for any such breach or default that has not had and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect. Each PharmAthene Real Property Sublease is a valid and binding obligation of PharmAthene or the Subsidiary of PharmAthene which is party thereto and, to the knowledge of PharmAthene, of each other party thereto, and is in full force and effect, except that (i) such enforcement may be subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other similar Laws, now or hereafter in effect, relating to creditors’ rights generally and (ii) equitable remedies of specific performance and injunctive and other forms of equitable relief may be subject to equitable defenses and to the discretion of the court before which any proceeding therefor may be brought.

Section 4.17 Takeover Statutes.  Assuming that neither Theraclone nor any of its “affiliates” or “associates” (as defined in section 203 of the DGCL) has been an “interested stockholder” (as defined in section 203 of the DGCL) at any time within three years prior to the date hereof, none of section 203 of the DGCL, any other state anti-takeover statute or regulation, or any takeover-related provision in the PharmAthene Certificate of Incorporation or PharmAthene Bylaws would prohibit or restrict the ability of PharmAthene to consummate the Merger or of the PharmAthene stockholders party to the PharmAthene Voting Agreement to perform their respective obligations thereunder.

Section 4.18 Material Contracts.

(a) Except as disclosed in Section 4.18 of the PharmAthene Disclosure Schedule, and except for this Agreement, neither PharmAthene nor any of its Subsidiaries is bound by any contract, arrangement, commitment or understanding:

(i) that constitutes a partnership, joint venture, technology sharing or similar agreement between PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries and any other person;

(ii) with respect to the service of any directors, officers, employees, or independent contractors or consultants that are natural persons, involving the payment of $100,000 or more in any 12 month

A-40


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

period, other than those that are terminable by PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries on no more than 30 days’ notice without penalty;

(iii) that limits the ability of PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries to compete or enter into in any line of business, in any geographic area or with any person, in each case, which limitation or requirement would reasonably be expected to be material to PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole;

(iv) with or to a labor union, works council or guild (including any collective bargaining agreement or similar agreement);

(v) relating to the use or right to use Intellectual Property, including any license or royalty agreements, other than an agreement entered into in the ordinary course of business and that is not material to PharmAthene;

(vi) that provides for indemnification by PharmAthene to any person, other than an agreement entered into in the ordinary course of business and that is not material to PharmAthene;

(vii) between PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries and any current or former director or officer of PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries, or any affiliate of any such person (other than an PharmAthene Benefit Plan);

(viii) with respect to (A) Indebtedness, (B) any capital lease obligations to any person other than PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries, (C) any obligations to any person other than PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries in respect of letters of credit and bankers’ acceptances, (D) any indebtedness to any person other than PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries under interest rate swap, hedging or similar agreements, (E) any obligations to pay to any person other than PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries the deferred purchase price of property or services, (F) indebtedness secured by any Lien on any property owned by PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries even though the obligor has not assumed or otherwise become liable for the payment thereof, or (G) any guaranty of any such obligations described in clauses (A) through (F) of any person other than PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries, in each case, having an outstanding amount in excess of $100,000 individually or $250,000 in the aggregate;

(ix) that is material to PharmAthene or that contains any so called “most favored nation” provision or similar provisions requiring PharmAthene to offer to a person any terms or conditions that are at least as favorable as those offered to one or more other persons;

(x) pursuant to which any agent, sales representative, distributor or other third party markets or sells any PharmAthene Product;

(xi) pursuant to which PharmAthene or any Subsidiary is a party granting rights of first refusal, rights of first offer or similar rights to acquire any business or assets of the PharmAthene or any Subsidiary;

(xii) relating to the purchase or sale of assets outside the ordinary course of business of PharmAthene;

(xiii) relating to the issuance of any securities of PharmAthene or any Subsidiary;

(xiv) pursuant to which any material asset of PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries is leased;

(xv) relates to the purchase of (A) any equipment entered into since December 31, 2012 and (B) any materials, supplies, or inventory since December 31, 2012, other than any agreement which, together with any other related agreement, involves the expenditure by the PharmAthene of less than $100,000;

(xvi) that represents a purchase order with any supplier for the purchase of inventory items in an amount in excess of $100,000 of materials;

A-41


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(xvii) pursuant to which PharmAthene or any Subsidiary is a party and having a remaining term of more than one (1) year after the date hereof or involving a remaining amount payable thereunder (either to or from PharmAthene) as of the date hereof, of at least $100,000;

(xviii) that involves the payment of $250,000 or more in any 12-month period after the date hereof; or

(xix) that would prevent, delay or impede the consummation, or otherwise reduce the contemplated benefits, of any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

PharmAthene has previously made available to PharmAthene or its representatives complete and accurate copies of each Contract of the type described in this Section 4.18(a) (collectively referred to herein as “PharmAthene Material Contracts”).

(b) All of the PharmAthene Material Contracts were entered into at arms’ length in the ordinary course of business and are valid and in full force and effect, except to the extent they have previously expired in accordance with their terms. Neither PharmAthene nor any of its Subsidiaries has given or received a notice of cancellation or termination under any PharmAthene Material Contract, or has, or is alleged to have, and to the knowledge of PharmAthene, none of the other parties thereto have, violated any provision of, or committed or failed to perform any act, and no event or condition exists, which with or without notice, lapse of time or both would constitute a default under the provisions of, any PharmAthene Material Contract.

(c) Neither PharmAthene nor any Subsidiary of PharmAthene is in breach of or default under the terms of any PharmAthene Material Contract, except for any such breach or default that has not had and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect. To the knowledge of PharmAthene, no other party to any PharmAthene Material Contract is in breach of or default under the terms of any PharmAthene Material Contract except for any such breach or default that has not had and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect. Each PharmAthene Material Contract is a valid and binding obligation of PharmAthene or the Subsidiary of PharmAthene which is party thereto and, to the knowledge of PharmAthene, of each other party thereto, and is in full force and effect, except that (i) such enforcement may be subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other similar Laws, now or hereafter in effect, relating to creditors’ rights generally and (ii) equitable remedies of specific performance and injunctive and other forms of equitable relief may be subject to equitable defenses and to the discretion of the court before which any proceeding therefor may be brought.

Section 4.19 Insurance.  PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries own or hold policies of insurance in amounts that PharmAthene has determined in good faith provide reasonably adequate coverage for its business and in amounts sufficient to comply with (i) applicable Law and (ii) all PharmAthene Material Contracts to which PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries are parties or are otherwise bound.

Section 4.20 Affiliate Transactions.  There are no transactions, agreements or arrangements between (i) PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries on the one hand, and (ii) any director, executive officer or affiliate of PharmAthene (other than any of its Subsidiaries) or any of their respective affiliates or immediate family members, on the other hand, of the type that would be required to be disclosed under Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act (such transactions referred to herein as “PharmAthene Affiliate Transactions”).

Section 4.21 Food And Drug Administration Matters.

(a) PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries are not in violation of the FDCA, the PHSA, or the Drug Laws applicable to their activities, including those relating to GLP, good clinical practices, adverse event reporting, good manufacturing practices, recordkeeping, user fees, clinical trial registries, and filing of reports, except for such violations that would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect. PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries have not received any written notice or other written communication from the FDA or any other Governmental Entity alleging any violation of any Drug Law, including any failure to maintain systems and programs adequate to

A-42


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ensure compliance with any applicable Law related to product quality, including “Good Manufacturing Practice,” “Good Laboratory Practice,” and “Good Clinical Practice” as those terms are defined by the FDA and in all applicable Drug Laws, by PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries relating to any activity that is subject to Drug Laws. Neither PharmAthene nor any of its Subsidiaries, nor, to the knowledge of PharmAthene, any third party acting on behalf of PharmAthene, has received any (i) notices of inspectional observations (including those recorded on form FDA 483), warning letters, untitled letters from the FDA or any other Governmental Entity, (ii) notice of any intention to conduct an investigation or review from the FDA or any other Governmental Entity, or (iii) other written documents issued by the FDA or any other Governmental Entity that indicate lack of compliance with any Drug Law by PharmAthene or its Subsidiaries or by persons who are otherwise performing services for the benefit of PharmAthene or its Subsidiaries. To PharmAthene’s knowledge, no third party acting on behalf of PharmAthene is subject to any regulatory restriction that would affect the development of PharmAthene products.

(b) PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries have all Authorizations from Governmental Entities that are material to the conduct of the business of PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, as currently conducted, and such Authorizations are in full force and effect in all material respects. PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries have filed all material reports, notifications and filings with, and have paid all material regulatory fees to, the applicable Governmental Entity necessary to maintain all of such Authorizations in full force and effect. PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries are, and have been, in compliance in all material respects with the terms of all Authorizations. Neither PharmAthene nor its Subsidiaries have received written notice to the effect that a Governmental Entity was or is considering the amendment, termination, revocation or cancellation of any Authorization. The consummation of the Merger or any of the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement, in and of itself, will not cause the amendment, termination, revocation or cancellation of any material Authorization.

(c) All preclinical tests performed in connection with or as the basis for any submission to the FDA or other comparable Governmental Entity submitted by PharmAthene or its Subsidiaries or that PharmAthene or its Subsidiaries anticipate will be submitted to the FDA or other comparable Governmental Entity either (i) have been conducted in accordance, in all material respects, with applicable GLP requirements, including those contained in 21 C.F.R. Part 58 or (ii) involved experimental research techniques that were not required to be performed by a registered GLP testing laboratory (with appropriate notice being given to FDA or the applicable Governmental Entity, if required), but employed procedures and controls generally used by qualified experts in the conduct of preclinical studies.

(d) None of PharmAthene’s product candidates (“PharmAthene Products”) have received marketing approval from any Governmental Entity. All human clinical trials to the extent conducted by PharmAthene, its Subsidiaries, or to the knowledge of PharmAthene, by a third party on behalf of PharmAthene or its Subsidiaries, have been and are being conducted in compliance with all applicable requirements of “Good Clinical Practice,” “Informed Consent” and, “Institutional Review Boards,” as those terms are defined by the FDA and in all applicable Drug Laws relating to clinical trials or the protection of human subjects, including those contained in the International Conference on Harmonization E6: Good Clinical Practices Consolidated Guideline, and in 21 C.F.R. Parts 50, 54, 56, and 312, and the provisions governing the privacy of patient medical records under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 and the implementing regulations of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, and all applicable comparable foreign Drug Laws, except for such failures to be in compliance that would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect. Neither PharmAthene, its Subsidiaries, nor to the knowledge of PharmAthene, anyone acting on behalf of PharmAthene, has received any written notice that the FDA or any other Governmental Entity or institutional review board has initiated, or threatened to initiate, any clinical hold or other action to suspend any clinical trial or suspend or terminate any IND (or foreign equivalent thereto) sponsored by PharmAthene or its Subsidiaries, or otherwise restrict the preclinical research on or clinical study of any PharmAthene Product.

(e) All clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of PharmAthene or its Subsidiaries and the results of all such clinical trials have been registered and disclosed in all material respects in accordance with all

A-43


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

applicable Drug Laws. PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries have filed all annual and periodic reports, amendments and IND Safety Reports required for any PharmAthene Product required to be made to the FDA or any other Governmental Entity, except for such failures to file that would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect.

(f) All manufacturing operations conducted by PharmAthene, its Subsidiaries, or, to the knowledge of PharmAthene, for the benefit of, PharmAthene or its Subsidiaries with respect to PharmAthene Products have been and are being conducted in accordance, in all material respects, with applicable current Good Manufacturing Practices as that term is defined by the FDA and in all applicable Drug Laws, and to the knowledge of PharmAthene, there are no material quality control or assurance issues with respect thereto.

(g) There are no proceedings pending or, to the knowledge of PharmAthene, threatened against PharmAthene or its Subsidiaries with respect to (i) a violation by PharmAthene or its Subsidiaries of any Drug Law, or (ii) any alleged injuries to a participant in any clinical trial conducted by or on behalf of PharmAthene or its Subsidiaries.

(h) PharmAthene has provided or made available to Theraclone reports of all material preclinical and material clinical studies and trials conducted by PharmAthene, regarding the efficacy and safety of SparVaxTM and Valortim, going back five years for SparVaxTM and two years for Valortim®, and its Subsidiaries or by a third party on behalf of PharmAthene or its Subsidiaries regarding the efficacy and safety of any of its product candidates.

(i) PharmAthene has delivered or made available to Theraclone all material correspondence and material meeting minutes received from or sent to the FDA and any other similar Governmental Entity, and all material written reports of phone conversations, visits or other contact with the FDA and any other similar Governmental Entity, relating to any PharmAthene Product or to compliance with any Drug Law, including any and all notices of inspectional observations, and any other documents received by PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries from the FDA or comparable foreign Governmental Entities which bear in any material way on PharmAthene’s and its Subsidiaries’ compliance with regulatory requirements of the FDA or comparable foreign Governmental Entities, or on the likelihood or timing of approval of any PharmAthene Product.

(j) None of PharmAthene, its Subsidiaries, or any officer, employee or, to the knowledge of PharmAthene, agent of PharmAthene or its Subsidiaries, has made an untrue statement of a material fact or fraudulent statement to the FDA or any other Governmental Entity, failed to disclose a material fact required to be disclosed to the FDA or any other Governmental Entity, or committed any act, made any statement, or failed to make any statement, that would reasonably be expected to provide a basis for the FDA to invoke its policy respecting “Fraud, Untrue Statements of Material Fact, Bribery, and Illegal Gratuities,” set forth in 56 Fed. Reg. 46191 (September 10, 1991). Neither PharmAthene, its Subsidiaries, nor, to the knowledge of PharmAthene, any officer, employee or agent of PharmAthene or its Subsidiaries has been convicted of any crime or engaged in any conduct that would reasonably be expected to result in or that has resulted in (i) debarment under 21 U.S.C. 335a or any similar state or federal Law or similar Law of a country other than the United States or (ii) exclusion from participating in the federal health care programs under 1128 of the Social Security Act or any similar state or federal Law or similar Law of a country other than the United States.

Section 4.22 Government Contracts.

(a) PharmAthene has delivered or made available to Theraclone complete and accurate copies of all PharmAthene Government Contracts. Each of the PharmAthene Government Contracts is valid, binding and in full force and effect, has been awarded to or novated to PharmAthene, and is enforceable in accordance with its terms by PharmAthene subject to the Governmental Entity’s rights, including its right to terminate each such PharmAthene Government Contract for the convenience of the Governmental Entity. For the purposes of this Agreement, “PharmAthene Government Contract” means any Government Contract of PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries, the period of performance of which has not yet expired or terminated, or expired or terminated since January 1, 2008, or for which final payment has not yet been received or has been received since January 1, 2008. Notwithstanding the foregoing definition,

A-44


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

“PharmAthene Government Contracts” do not include contracts with all of the following characteristics: (i) no longer in effect, (ii) relate to products no longer offered by PharmAthene and which PharmAthene has no intent to further pursue, and (iii) no existing funding or proposal by PharmAthene for funding.

(b) PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries have complied in all material respects with all statutory and regulatory requirements, including the Armed Services Procurement Act, the Service Contract Act, the Procurement Integrity Act, the False Claims Act, the Buy American Act, the Trade Agreements Act, Executive Order No. 11246 and related regulations, the Truth in Negotiations Act, the Federal Procurement and Administrative Services Act, the Federal Acquisition Regulation, where and as applicable to each of the PharmAthene Government Contracts or to bids or proposals for Government Contracts submitted since January 1, 2008. The representations and certifications made by PharmAthene or its Subsidiaries with respect to such Government Contracts were accurate in all material respects as of their effective date and, to the extent that any such certifications are on-going, PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries have complied with all such certifications in all material respects. Except as set forth in Section 4.22(c) of the PharmAthene Disclosure Schedule, no annual past performance evaluation received by PharmAthene or its Subsidiaries, if any, with respect to any such PharmAthene Government Contract has set forth a default or other material failure to perform thereunder or termination thereof, or assigned a rating of less than satisfactory.

(c) With respect to the PharmAthene Government Contracts, no Governmental Entity, prime contractor or higher-tier subcontractor under a Government Contract or any other person has notified PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries in writing of any actual or alleged material violation or breach of any statute, regulation, representation, certification, disclosure obligation, contract term, condition, clause, provision or specification by PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries that would be reasonably expected to materially affect payments under any PharmAthene Government Contracts or materially adversely affect the award of Government Contracts to PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries in the future. Neither PharmAthene nor any of its Subsidiaries has received any written show cause, cure, deficiency, default or similar notice relating to any PharmAthene Government Contracts; and, except as set forth in Section 4.22(c) of the PharmAthene Disclosure Schedule, neither PharmAthene nor any of its Subsidiaries have received any written notice terminating in whole or in part any of the PharmAthene Government Contracts for convenience or default or indicating an intent to terminate in whole or in part any of the PharmAthene Government Contracts for convenience or default, or declining to exercise an option to continue performance for a subsequent period.

(d) PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries have not received any written or, to the knowledge of PharmAthene, oral, notice of any outstanding protests challenging the award of any PharmAthene Government Contract, or Claims (as the term “Claim” is defined in FAR 2.101), or contract Disputes (as the term “Disputes” is used in the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, as amended, 41 U.S.C. 601 et. seq.) to which PharmAthene or its Subsidiaries is a party (i) arising under or relating to the PharmAthene Government Contracts and involving either a Governmental Entity, any prime contractor, any higher-tier subcontractor, vendor or any third party; and (ii) arising under or relating to any PharmAthene Government Contract under the Contract Disputes Act.

(e) Neither PharmAthene, its Subsidiaries, nor their respective Principals (as defined at FAR 52.209-5), nor to the knowledge of PharmAthene, their respective employees have ever been, or are now, suspended, debarred or proposed for suspension or debarment from bidding on any Government Contract, nor is there any circumstance that would require an affirmative certification under FAR 52.209-5. PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries have not received written notice of the commencement of any suspension or debarment actions with respect to PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries, or any of their respective Principals or employees, nor, to the knowledge of PharmAthene, has a Governmental Entity threatened to initiate a suspension or debarment action against PharmAthene or its Subsidiaries or any of their officers or employees. PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries have not received a negative determination of responsibility issued by a Governmental Entity against PharmAthene or its Subsidiaries since January 1, 2008 with respect to any quotation, bid or proposal for a Government Contract submitted by PharmAthene or its Subsidiaries.

A-45


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(f) Since July 1, 2011, (i) except for non-material amounts in the ordinary business, no amount of money due to PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries pertaining to any PharmAthene Government Contract has been withheld or set off, nor has any claim been made against PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries with respect to such amounts; (ii) no PharmAthene Government Contract or task order has been performed at a loss, and no facts or circumstances currently exist that would reasonably be expected to cause PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries to incur a loss on any PharmAthene Government Contract or task order; (iii) except for non-material amounts in the ordinary course of business, no cost incurred by PharmAthene or its Subsidiaries pertaining to any PharmAthene Government Contract has been formally questioned, challenged or disallowed, or to the knowledge of PharmAthene, is the subject of any investigation other than pursuant to a routine audit by a Governmental Entity, and, except for non-material amounts in the ordinary course of business, neither PharmAthene nor any of its Subsidiaries has received any written notice challenging, questioning, proposing for disallowance, or disallowing any costs with respect to any PharmAthene Government Contract that resulted in or may result in (x) repayment of amounts by PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries to any of its customers or (y) reductions in amounts that would otherwise reasonably have been expected to be paid to PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries by any of its customers pursuant to a PharmAthene Government Contract; and (iv) PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries’ cost accounting systems have complied in all material respects with applicable Cost Accounting Standards (as defined in FAR Chapter 99).

(g) PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries have submitted to the responsible Governmental Entity all forward pricing indirect cost rates to be bid, billed, and charged under PharmAthene Government Contracts for the years prior to and including the fiscal year 2013 and incurred cost submissions with respect to cost reimbursable contracts for the years prior to and including the 2012 fiscal year. Within the past three years, no costs have been disallowed as expressly unallowable costs subject to penalties under FAR §31.110 and §42.709.

(h) Neither PharmAthene nor any of its Subsidiaries have performed any activities under PharmAthene Government Contracts, nor do any of them have any other relationship with any other person that could result in an “organizational conflict of interest” as defined in Subpart 9.5 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation and agency supplements thereto, and there is no organizational conflict of interest mitigation plan in effect that restricts the future business activities of PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries.

(i) Since January 1, 2008, neither PharmAthene nor any of its Subsidiaries have made any voluntary or mandatory disclosure in writing to any Governmental Entity with respect to any material alleged irregularity, misstatement or omission arising under or relating to a Government Contract, and neither PharmAthene nor any of its Subsidiaries has failed to make any disclosure with respect to which such failure constitutes a ground for debarment.

(j) PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries are not required to maintain and possess facility clearances granted by any Governmental Entity to perform the PharmAthene Government Contracts. PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries are not required to employ employees with personal security clearances to perform such PharmAthene Government Contracts.

(k) To the knowledge of PharmAthene, none of PharmAthene’s or its Subsidiaries’ employees, consultants or agents is (or during the last three years has been) under administrative, civil or criminal investigation or indictment by any Governmental Entity with respect to the conduct of PharmAthene’s business.

Section 4.23 Subsidiaries.  Section 4.23 of the PharmAthene Disclosure Schedule sets forth a true and complete list of all the Subsidiaries of PharmAthene. Each Subsidiary of PharmAthene is a corporation or other entity duly organized, validly existing and, in the case of corporations, in good standing under the laws of its jurisdiction of formation, has all requisite power and authority to own, lease and operate its properties and to carry on its business as now being conducted, and is duly qualified and in good standing to do business in each jurisdiction in which the nature of its business or the ownership or leasing of its properties makes such qualification necessary and where the failure so to qualify would have a material effect on PharmAthene. All of the shares of capital stock of each of the Subsidiaries held by PharmAthene or by another PharmAthene

A-46


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Subsidiary are fully paid and non-assessable and are owned by PharmAthene or a Subsidiary of PharmAthene free and clear of any material Lien, except for PharmAthene Permitted Liens. Except for the Subsidiaries set forth in Section 4.23 of the PharmAthene Disclosure Schedule, PharmAthene neither directly nor indirectly, (a) owns or otherwise controls, (b) has agreed to purchase or otherwise acquire or (c) holds any interest convertible into or exchangeable for, any capital stock or other equity interest of any other corporation, partnership, joint venture or other business association or entity.

Section 4.24 Vote of PharmAthene Stockholders.  Except for the approval (“PharmAthene Stockholder Approval”) by the vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of PharmAthene Common Stock in favor of (a) the issuance of the aggregate Merger Consideration, (b) the election of the PharmAthene Board Designees and the Theraclone Board Designees, (c) the amendment to the PharmAthene certificate of incorporation (“PharmAthene Charter Amendment”) in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 5, and (d) the compensation payable to certain PharmAthene executives in connection with the Merger to the extent required by Rule 14a-21 under the Exchange Act (the matters in clauses (a), (b), (c), and (d) collectively, the “PharmAthene Stockholder Approval Matters”), no vote of the stockholders of PharmAthene or the holders of any other securities of PharmAthene (equity or otherwise) is required by any applicable Law, the certificate of incorporation or bylaws or other equivalent organizational documents of PharmAthene to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby.

Section 4.25 Finders or Brokers.  Except as set forth in Section 4.25 of the Disclosure Schedule, neither PharmAthene nor any of its Subsidiaries has employed any investment banker, broker or finder in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement who is entitled to any fee or any commission in connection with or upon consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby.

Section 4.26 Disclosure.  No representation or warranty or other statement made by PharmAthene or Merger Sub in this Agreement, the PharmAthene Disclosure Schedule, the certificates delivered pursuant to Section 7.2(d) or otherwise in connection with the transactions contemplated herein contains any untrue statement or, to PharmAthene’s knowledge, omits to state a material fact necessary to make any of them, in light of the circumstances in which it was made, not misleading.

ARTICLE V
 
INDEMNIFICATION

Section 5.1 Indemnification by Theraclone Stockholders.  Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, each of the Theraclone Stockholders, solely from the Escrow Account and subject to the limitations set forth in Section 5.4 below, severally and not jointly, will indemnify and hold harmless PharmAthene and its directors, officers, stockholders, employees, agents, subsidiaries and affiliates (the “PharmAthene Indemnified Persons”), and will reimburse the PharmAthene Indemnified Persons for, any loss, liability, damage or expense, including reasonable out-of-pocket costs of investigation and defense of claims and reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses (collectively, “Losses”) incurred by the PharmAthene Indemnified Persons arising or resulting from or in connection with any of the following:

(a) any breach of any representation or warranty made by Theraclone in Article III of this Agreement; or

(b) any breach of any covenant or agreement of Theraclone in Article VI of this Agreement.

All claims for indemnification under this Section 5.1 shall be administered by PharmAthene for itself and on behalf of all other PharmAthene Indemnified Persons. For purposes of this Article V, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, Losses shall not include, and no PharmAthene Indemnified Person shall be compensated or reduce the consideration payable hereunder for, any consequential damages of any PharmAthene Indemnified Person to the extent not reasonably foreseeable or any special, incidental or punitive damages of any PharmAthene Indemnified Person, but Losses shall include, and PharmAthene Indemnified Persons shall be compensated for, any consequential, special, incidental or punitive damages included in a claim asserted by any person who is not a PharmAthene Indemnified Person.

A-47


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section 5.2 No Indemnification by PharmAthene or the Surviving Subsidiary.  Neither PharmAthene nor the Surviving Subsidiary shall have any obligation to indemnify the Theraclone Stockholders for any breach of any representation or warranty made by, or any covenant or agreement of, PharmAthene or the Merger Sub in this Agreement.

Section 5.3 Indemnification Limitation — Survival.

(a) All representations and warranties of Theraclone contained in this Agreement shall survive the Closing and shall continue in full force and effect until the date that is nine (9) months after the Closing Date (the “Indemnity Period”). All covenants and other obligations of Theraclone contained in this Agreement shall expire at the Closing, except those covenants or obligations that explicitly survive the Closing, which covenants and obligations shall continue in full force and effect until the earlier of such time as (i) such covenants or obligations expire, (ii) such covenants or obligations are fully performed and satisfied, or (iii) the expiration of the statute of limitations with respect to such covenants or obligations, in each case in accordance with the respective terms of such covenants and obligations set forth in this Agreement. The right to indemnification based upon such representations, warranties, covenants and obligations shall not be affected by any examination, inspection, audit, or other investigation conducted by PharmAthene with respect to, or any knowledge acquired at any time with respect to, the accuracy or inaccuracy of or compliance with any such representation, warrant, covenant or obligation, unless PharmAthene had such knowledge at the time of Closing.

(b) None of the representations, warranties, covenants, or agreements of PharmAthene or Merger Sub in this Agreement or in any document or instrument delivered pursuant to this Agreement shall survive the Merger or the termination of this Agreement.

Section 5.4 Indemnification Limitation — Deductible and Cap.

(a) No Theraclone Stockholder shall have any obligation to indemnify the PharmAthene Indemnified Persons under Section 5.1(a), and no such indemnification claims shall be brought against any Theraclone Stockholder, absent fraud or willful misconduct of Theraclone, unless the total of all such Losses for all claims for indemnification made by the PharmAthene Indemnified Persons under Section 5.1(a) exceeds $1,000,000 in the aggregate, in which event the Theraclone Stockholders shall be liable for all such Losses from the first dollar above $1,000,000 (the “Deductible”).

(b) No Theraclone Stockholder shall have any obligation to indemnify the PharmAthene Indemnified Persons under Section 5.1(a), and no such indemnification claims shall be brought against any Theraclone Stockholder, absent fraud or willful misconduct of Theraclone, for an amount of Losses incurred by the PharmAthene Indemnified Persons in excess of such Theraclone Stockholder’s Pro Rata Share of the Escrow Shares (such aggregate amount, the “Indemnification Cap”). It is understood and agreed by the parties that recourse by the PharmAthene Indemnified Persons to the Escrow Fund shall constitute the sole and exclusive remedy of the PharmAthene Indemnified Persons for all Losses (other than for fraud or willful misconduct of Theraclone) that are to be indemnified by the Theraclone Stockholders hereunder.

Section 5.5 Indemnity Escrow; Distribution from Indemnity Escrow.

(a) Indemnity Escrow.  To secure each Theraclone Stockholders’ performance of its indemnity obligations under this ARTICLE V, and pursuant to Section 2.1(a), on the Closing Date, PharmAthene shall deliver to Citibank, N.A. (the “Escrow Agent”) the Escrow Shares, which shall be held by the Escrow Agent in one escrow account (the “Escrow Fund”) established with the Escrow Agent in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Escrow Agreement. The Escrow Agreement shall have a term lasting until the later of (i) the end of the Indemnity Period and (ii) such time that all claims arising in connection with the Escrow Fund prior to the expiration of the Indemnity Period have been fully resolved. The fees and expenses of the Escrow Agent under the Escrow Agreement shall be borne by PharmAthene. Any reduction in, or claim against, the Escrow Shares pursuant to this Agreement shall be made on a pro rata basis among all Theraclone Stockholders based on their Pro Rata Share.

A-48


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(b) Distribution from Escrow.  

(i) As soon as reasonably practicable (but in any event within ten (10) business days) following the expiration of the Indemnity Period, the Escrow Agent shall release to the Theraclone Stockholders, at their respective addresses and in accordance with their respective Pro Rata Shares, the Escrow Dividends (as defined below) and all of the remaining Escrow Shares, if any, in excess of (i) any Escrow Shares delivered by the Escrow Agent to PharmAthene Indemnified Persons in satisfaction of Losses incurred thereby and (ii) any amount of Escrow Shares that is necessary to satisfy all unresolved, unsatisfied or disputed claims for Losses specified in any Third Party Claim Notice or other claim notice delivered to the Securityholders’ Representative before the expiration of the Indemnity Period. If any claims for Losses are unresolved, unsatisfied or disputed as of the expiration of the Indemnity Period, then the Escrow Agent shall retain possession of that number of Escrow Shares equal to the total maximum amount of Losses then being claimed by PharmAthene Indemnified Persons in all such unresolved, unsatisfied or disputed claims, and as soon as reasonably practicable (but in any event within ten (10) business days) following resolution of all such claims, Escrow Agent shall release to the Theraclone Stockholders, at their respective addresses and in accordance with their respective Pro Rata Shares of the Escrow Shares, all remaining Escrow Shares, if any, not required to satisfy such claims. Such releases of Escrow Dividends shall be made by check. If the number of Escrow Shares to be distributed to any Theraclone Stockholder is not evenly divisible by one, PharmAthene shall round to the nearest whole number.

(ii) If it is determined under the terms of this Agreement or by mutual agreement of PharmAthene and the Securityholders’ Representative that Theraclone Stockholders have an obligation to indemnify a PharmAthene Indemnified Person for a claim pursuant to Section 5.1, then such PharmAthene Indemnified Person shall make such claim against the Escrow Fund in accordance with the terms and conditions of the applicable Escrow Agreement and any Losses for which such PharmAthene Indemnified Person is entitled to indemnification shall be recovered or paid from each Theraclone Stockholder’s Pro Rata Share of the applicable Escrow Fund in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and the applicable Escrow Agreement until the aggregate amount of such Losses are paid or until the applicable Escrow Fund has been depleted.

(c) Distributions on Escrow Shares.  Any dividends or distributions payable in shares of PharmAthene Stock or other equity securities or issued upon a stock split made in respect of any Escrow Shares shall be considered Escrow Shares hereunder. Cash dividends and any other dividends or distributions in kind on the Escrow Shares (“Escrow Dividends”) shall be distributed to the Theraclone Stockholders in accordance with their respective Pro Rata Shares within ten (10) business days following the expiration of the Indemnity Period.

(d) Voting of Escrow Shares.  The Theraclone Stockholders on whose behalf Escrow Shares are held by Escrow Agent shall be entitled to vote such shares. PharmAthene need not forward proxy information, annual or other reports or other information with respect to the Escrow Shares to the Theraclone Stockholders to the extent such documents or materials are otherwise furnished by PharmAthene with respect to other shares of PharmAthene Stock distributed to such holders pursuant to this Agreement.

(e) No Transfer or Encumbrance.  To the extent permitted by applicable law, no Escrow Shares, Escrow Dividends, or any beneficial interest therein may be pledged, encumbered, sold, assigned or transferred (including any transfer by operation of law), by PharmAthene, any Theraclone Stockholder or be taken or reached by any legal or equitable process in satisfaction of any debt or other liability of PharmAthene or any Theraclone Stockholder or used for any reason, prior to (i) in the case of PharmAthene, the retention of Escrow Shares in satisfaction of a resolved claim for Losses, or (ii) in the case of the Theraclone Stockholders with respect to any Escrow Shares or Escrow Dividends, the release by Escrow Agent to the Theraclone Stockholders of Escrow Shares and Escrow Dividends, in accordance with this Agreement, except that Theraclone Stockholders shall be entitled to assign their rights to the Escrow Shares, Escrow Dividends, by will, by the laws of intestacy or by other operation of law.

A-49


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section 5.6 Indemnification Procedures.

(a) A PharmAthene Indemnified Person hereunder (the “Claiming Party”) shall give the Securityholders’ Representative prompt written notice of any claim of a third party during the Indemnity Period (a “Third Party Claim”) as to which the Claiming Party proposes to demand indemnification hereunder, within fifteen (15) days after learning of such Third Party Claim (or within such shorter time as may be necessary to give the Securityholders’ Representative a reasonable opportunity to respond to such claim and, in any event, prior to the expiration of the Indemnity Period), together with a statement setting forth in reasonable detail the nature and basis of such Third Party Claim and providing copies of the relevant documents evidencing such Third Party Claim, the amount of the claim, and the basis for the indemnification sought (such notice, statement and documents together, the “Third Party Claim Notice”). The Third Party Claim Notice shall (i) describe the claim in reasonable detail, and (ii) indicate the amount (estimated, if necessary, and to the extent feasible) of the Losses that have been or may be suffered by the Claiming Party with respect to such Third Party Claim. The failure to give a Third Party Claim Notice to the Securityholders’ Representative shall not relieve the Theraclone Stockholders of any liability hereunder unless the Theraclone Stockholders were prejudiced thereby under this Article V, and then only to the extent of such prejudice. The Securityholders’ Representative must provide written notice to the Claiming Party that it is either (i) assuming responsibility for the Third Party Claim, or (ii) disputing the claim for indemnification against it (such notice, the “Indemnification Notice”). The Indemnification Notice must be provided by the Securityholders’ Representative to the Claiming Party within forty-five (45) days after receipt of the notice from the Claiming Party of the Third Party Claim (such period is referred to herein as the “Indemnification Notice Period”).

(b) If the Securityholders’ Representative provides an Indemnification Notice to the Claiming Party within the Indemnification Notice Period stating that it assumes responsibility for the Third Party Claim, the Securityholders’ Representative shall have the right to assume and conduct the defense of such Third Party Claim at its own expense; provided, however, that the Claiming Party will be allowed a reasonable opportunity to participate in the defense of such Third Party Claim with its own counsel and at its own expense; and provided, further, that in the event that the interests of the Claiming Party and the Securityholders’ Representative are, or may reasonably become, in conflict with, or adverse to one another, with respect to such Third Party Claim, the Claiming Party may retain its own counsel at its own expense with respect to such Third Party Claim. In the event the Securityholders’ Representative assumes and conducts the defense on behalf of the Claiming Party, the Securityholders’ Representative shall, subject to Section 5.3, Section 5.4, and Section 5.5, as applicable, be deemed to acknowledge that it is responsible to the Claiming Party for any damages as a result of such Third Party Claim, and may settle such Third Party Claim, but shall not, without the consent of the Claiming Party (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed), agree to any settlement that does not include a provision whereby the plaintiff or claimant in the Third Party Claim releases the Claiming Party from all liability with respect thereto or agree to any relief other than money damages (and a full release related thereto). If the Securityholders’ Representative does not assume the defense of such Third Party Claim in the manner provided above and does not dispute the claim for indemnification against it, or if after commencing or undertaking any such defense, fails to prosecute diligently or withdraws from such defense, the Claiming Party shall have the right to undertake the defense or settlement thereof, and the Claiming Party may defend against, or enter into any settlement with respect to, the matter in any manner the Claiming Party reasonably may deem appropriate; provided that any such settlement of such Third Party Claim must include a provision whereby the plaintiff or claimant in the matter releases the Claiming Party and the Securityholders’ Representative from all liability with respect thereto; provided further that such Third Party Claim may not be settled without the consent of the Theraclone Secruityholders’ Representative (not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed); and provided further that the Securityholders’ Representative will be allowed a reasonable opportunity to participate in the defense of such Third Party Claim with its own counsel and at its own expense. In the event that a final judgment or order in favor of such third party in respect of such Third Party Claim is rendered against the Claiming Party, that is not subject to appeal or with respect to which the time to appeal has expired without an appeal having been made,

A-50


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

then subject to the limitations set forth in Section 5.3, Section 5.4, and Section 5.5, the Escrow Agent shall transfer to PharmAthene of a portion of the applicable Escrow Fund in an amount equal such liability.

(c) In the event that the Securityholders’ Representative disputes the claim for indemnification against it with respect to such Third Party Claim, the Claiming Party shall have the right to conduct the defense and to compromise and settle such Third Party Claim in any manner the Claiming Party may deem reasonably appropriate; provided that the Claiming Party shall not, without the consent of the Securityholders’ Representative, agree to any settlement that does not include a provision whereby the plaintiff or claimant of such Third Party Claim releases the Theraclone Stockholders’ from all liability with respect to such Third Party Claim; and provided further that such Third Party Claim may not be settled without the consent of the Theraclone Secruityholders’ Representative (not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed). If such dispute regarding the indemnification obligation of the Theraclone Stockholders with respect to such Third Party Claim has been finally resolved by a court or other tribunal of competent jurisdiction, or by mutual agreement of the Claiming Party and Securityholders’ Representative, to provide for indemnification by the Theraclone Stockholders’ of such Third Party Claim, subject to the provisions of Section 5.3, Section 5.4, and Section 5.5, the Escrow Agent shall within ten (10) days of the date of such resolution or agreement pay to the Claiming Party all damages paid or incurred by the Claiming Party in connection therewith by transferring to PharmAthene of a portion of the applicable Escrow Fund in an amount equal to such liability.

(d) In the event any Claiming Party should have a claim against the Theraclone Stockholders for indemnification of Losses hereunder during the Indemnity Period (other than in connection with a Third Party Claim), such Claiming Party shall deliver prompt notice of such claim to (i) the Securityholders’ Representative within fifteen (15) days after learning of such claim (or within such shorter time as may be necessary to give the Securityholders’ Representative a reasonable opportunity to respond to such claim and, in any event, prior to the expiration of the Indemnity Period) and (ii) to the Escrow Agent, stating (A) that the Claiming Party has paid or reserved the Losses and (B) in reasonable detail the nature and basis of such claim and providing copies of the relevant documents evidencing such claim, the amount of the claim, and the basis for the indemnification sought. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the failure of the Claiming Party to give such notice to the Securityholders’ Representative shall not relieve the Theraclone Stockholders of any liability hereunder unless the Theraclone Stockholders were prejudiced thereby under this Article V, and then only to the extent of such prejudice. If the Securityholders’ Representative notifies the Claiming Party that it does not dispute the claim described in such notice or fails to notify the Claiming Party within forty-five (45) days after delivery of such notice by the Claiming Party whether the Securityholders’ Representative disputes the claim described in such notice, the Loss in the amount specified in the Claiming Party’s notice shall be conclusively deemed a liability of the Theraclone Stockholders and, subject to the limitations set forth in this Article V, the Escrow Agent shall cause the transfer to PharmAthene of a portion of the applicable Escrow Fund in an amount equal to such liability. If the Securityholders’ Representative has timely disputed its liability with respect to such claim, the dispute shall be resolved by mutual agreement of the Claiming Party and Securityholders’ Representative, or in the absence of such agreement, by a court or other tribunal of competent jurisdiction. With respect to any such Loss, the Escrow Agent, on behalf of Theraclone Stockholders, shall transfer to PharmAthene a portion of the applicable Escrow Fund in an amount equal to such liability, no later than ten (10) days following the determination of the Theraclone Stockholders’ liability (whether such determination is made pursuant to the procedures set forth in this Section 5.6(d), by agreement between the Securityholders’ Representative and the Claiming Party or by final adjudication).

(e) Any indemnity payment due and payable by Escrow Agent under this Agreement shall be net of (i) any insurance proceeds actually recovered or received by the Claiming Party or any of its respective affiliates. The Claiming Party agrees to use commercially reasonable efforts to pursue any claims for insurance with respect to the claims or Losses for which it is seeking indemnification hereunder, (ii) indemnity or contribution amounts actually received from third parties (net of applicable costs of recovery or collection thereof), (iii) the amount of any Tax refunds, credits or other reductions in Taxes

A-51


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

actually received or realized or recognized by PharmAthene, its Affiliates or such PharmAthene Indemnified Person (“Tax Benefit”) to the extent attributable to the incurrence or payment of such Losses; and (iv) any Tax Benefit resulting from any payment which is made pursuant to this Agreement and which is treated as compensation for any Tax purpose. Except as otherwise provided in this Section 5.6(e), the existence of any insurance policies shall not affect the indemnification obligations of Theraclone Stockholders.

(f) The Securityholders’ Representative shall act as the representative of Theraclone Stockholders for purposes of this Section 5.6 and as further described in Section 5.7.

Section 5.7 Securityholders’ Representative.

(a) At the Closing, Steven Gillis, Ph.D. shall be constituted and appointed as the Securityholders’ Representative. For purposes of this Agreement, the term “Securityholders’ Representative” shall mean the agent for and on behalf of the Theraclone Stockholders to: (i) execute, as Securityholders’ Representative, this Agreement, the Escrow Agreement and any agreement or instrument entered into or delivered in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby; (ii) give and receive notices, instructions, and communications permitted or required under this Agreement, the Escrow Agreement, or any other agreement, document or instrument entered into or executed in connection herewith, for and on behalf of any Theraclone Stockholder, to or from PharmAthene (on behalf of itself or any other PharmAthene Indemnified Person) and/or the Escrow Agent relating to this Agreement, the Escrow Agreement or any of the transactions and other matters contemplated by hereby or thereby (except to the extent that this Agreement expressly contemplates that any such notice or communication shall be given or received by each Theraclone Stockholder individually); (ii) review, negotiate and agree to and authorize transfers to PharmAthene from the Escrow Fund in satisfaction of Losses incurred by PharmAthene (on behalf of itself or any other PharmAthene Indemnified Person) pursuant to Article V; (iii) object to such claims pursuant to Article V; (iv) consent or agree to, negotiate, enter into, or, if applicable, contest, prosecute or defend, settlements and compromises of, and demand arbitration and comply with orders of courts and awards of arbitrators with respect to, such claims, resolve any such claims, take any actions in connection with the resolution of any dispute relating hereto or to the transactions contemplated hereby by arbitration, settlement or otherwise, and take or forego any or all actions permitted or required of any Theraclone Stockholder or necessary in the judgment of the Securityholders’ Representative for the accomplishment of the foregoing and all of the other terms, conditions and limitations of this Agreement; (v) consult with legal counsel, independent public accountants and other experts selected by it, solely at the cost and expense of the Theraclone Stockholders; (vi) consent or agree to any amendment to this Agreement or to waive any terms and conditions of this Agreement providing rights or benefits to the Theraclone Stockholders (other than with respect to the payment of the Merger Consideration) in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and in the manner provided herein; and (vii) take all actions necessary or appropriate in the judgment of the Securityholders’ Representative for the accomplishment of the foregoing, in each case without having to seek or obtain the consent of any person under any circumstance. The Theraclone Stockholders shall be bound by all actions taken and documents executed by the Securityholders’ Representative in connection with this Agreement.

(b) The Securityholders’ Representative shall not be liable to any Theraclone Stockholders for any act done or omitted hereunder as the Securityholders’ Representative while acting in good faith (and any act done or omitted pursuant to the advice of counsel shall be conclusive evidence of such good faith) and without gross negligence or willful misconduct. The Securityholders’ Representative shall serve as the Securityholders’ Representative without compensation; provided, that the Theraclone Stockholders shall severally indemnify the Securityholders’ Representative and hold him harmless against any loss, liability or expense incurred without gross negligence, willful misconduct or bad faith on the part of the Securityholders’ Representative and arising out of or in connection with the acceptance or administration of his duties hereunder, including all reasonable out-of-pocket costs and expenses and legal fees and other legal costs reasonably incurred by the Securityholders’ Representative. If not paid directly to the Securityholders’ Representative by the Theraclone Stockholders, such losses, liabilities or expenses may be recovered by the Securityholders’ Representative from the Escrow Fund otherwise distributable to the Theraclone Stockholders after the expiration of the Indemnity Period pursuant to the terms of this

A-52


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Agreement and of the Escrow Agreement, at the time of distribution, and such recovery will be made from the Theraclone Stockholders according to their respective Pro Rata Share.

(c) Any notice or communication given or received by, and any decision, action, failure to act within a designated period of time, agreement, consent, settlement, resolution or instruction of, the Securityholders’ Representative that is within the scope of the Securityholders’ Representative’s authority under Article V shall constitute a notice or communication to or by, or a decision, action, failure to act within a designated period of time, agreement, consent, settlement, resolution or instruction of all the Theraclone Stockholders and shall be final, binding and conclusive upon each such Theraclone Stockholder.

(d) The person serving as the Securityholders’ Representative may be replaced from time to time by the holders of at least majority in interest of the Escrow Shares held in the Escrow Fund upon not less than ten (10) days’ prior written notice to Theraclone. No bond shall be required of the Securityholders’ Representative, and the Securityholders’ Representative shall receive no compensation for his services.

Section 5.8 Representations and Warranties.  The representations and warranties of Theraclone contained in this Agreement constitute the sole and exclusive representations and warranties made by or on behalf of Theraclone in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and PharmAthene understands, acknowledges and agrees that all other representations and warranties made by or on behalf of Theraclone of any kind or nature, express or implied, are specifically disclaimed by the Company.

Section 5.9 Exclusive Remedy.  Except with respect to any Loss that is the result of fraud or willful misconduct on the part of Theraclone, PharmAthene agrees that from and after the Closing, PharmAthene Indemnified Persons’ sole and exclusive remedy with respect to any and all claims relating to breaches of covenants, representations and warranties of this Agreement shall be indemnification pursuant to this Article V; provided, however, that nothing in this provision shall limit any equitable remedy, including injunctions and specific performance, that a PharmAthene Indemnified Person may have pursuant to this Agreement.

Section 5.10 Subrogation.  Upon making any indemnification payment under this Article V, the Theraclone Stockholders will, to the extent of such payment, be subrogated to all rights of the Claiming Party against any third party in respect of the Losses to which such payment relates.

Section 5.11 Merger Consideration Adjustment.  All indemnification payments made hereunder will be treated by all parties as adjustments to the Merger Consideration.

ARTICLE VI
 
CERTAIN AGREEMENTS

Section 6.1 Conduct of Business by Theraclone and by PharmAthene.

(a) Subject to the terms of the Confidentiality Agreement which PharmAthene and Theraclone agree will continue in full force following the date of this Agreement, from and after the date of this Agreement and prior to the Effective Time or the date, if any, on which this Agreement is earlier terminated pursuant to Section 8.1 (the “Termination Date”), and except (i) as may be required by applicable Law, (ii) as may be agreed in writing by PharmAthene or Theraclone, as applicable, (iii) as may be required or expressly permitted by this Agreement or (iv) as set forth in Section 6.1 of the Theraclone Disclosure Schedule or Section 6.1 of the PharmAthene Disclosure Schedule, as applicable, each of PharmAthene (with respect to itself and its Subsidiaries) and Theraclone agrees that (A) the business of it and, with respect to PharmAthene, its Subsidiaries shall be conducted in, and such entities shall not take any action except in, the ordinary course of business and, to the extent consistent therewith, (B) it shall use commercially reasonable efforts to preserve substantially intact its current business organizations, to keep available the services of its current officers and employees and to preserve its relationships with significant suppliers, licensors, licensees, distributors, lessors and others having significant business dealings with it.

A-53


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(b) Between the date of this Agreement and the earlier of the Effective Time and the Termination Date, without the prior written consent of PharmAthene (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), except as set forth in Section 6.1 of the Theraclone Disclosure Schedule or as required by applicable Law, Theraclone shall not:

(i) authorize, declare or pay any dividends on, or make any distribution with respect to, its outstanding shares of capital stock (whether in cash, assets, shares or other securities of Theraclone);

(ii) split, combine or reclassify any of its capital stock or other equity securities or issue or authorize or propose the issuance of any other securities in respect of, in lieu of or in substitution for shares of its capital stock or other equity securities;

(iii) (A) other than grants to Theraclone employees in the ordinary course of business or to a new employee in a manner consistent with past practice, grant, or commit to grant any stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted stock units, deferred equity units, awards based on the value of Theraclone Common Shares, or other equity-based awards with respect to Theraclone Common Shares, under any equity incentive plan (including the Theraclone Stock Incentive Plan) or otherwise, or (B) except as required by applicable Law (including section 409A of the Code and regulations issued thereunder), (1) increase or commit to increase the compensation or other benefits payable or provided to Theraclone’s current or former directors, officers, employees, consultants, or independent contractors, (2) enter into or commit to enter into any employment, change of control, severance, retention, deferred compensation, indemnification, or similar agreement with any director, officer, employee, consultant, or independent contractor of Theraclone, other than (I) in the ordinary course of business with respect to a new employee in a manner consistent with past practice or (II) for employment agreements terminable on less than thirty (30) days’ notice without penalty or cost, including severance, or (3) except as permitted pursuant to clause (I) or (II) above or as required pursuant to the terms of any Theraclone Benefit Plan, establish, adopt, enter into, amend, become a party to, or commence participation in, or commit to establish, adopt, enter into, amend, become a party to, or commence participation in, any collective bargaining agreement, plan, trust, fund, policy, or arrangement, or Theraclone Benefit Plan (or any plan, arrangement, agreement, program, practice, or policy that would be a Theraclone Benefit Plan if it were in effect as of the date of this Agreement) for the benefit of any current or former directors, officers, employees, consultants, or independent contractors, or any of their beneficiaries;

(iv) materially change financial accounting policies or procedures or any of its methods of reporting income, deductions or other material items for financial accounting purposes, except as required by GAAP, SEC rule or policy or applicable Law;

(v) adopt any amendments to the Theraclone Certificate of Incorporation or the Theraclone Bylaws;

(vi) issue, sell, pledge, dispose of or encumber, or authorize the issuance, sale, pledge, disposition or encumbrance of, any shares of its capital stock or other ownership interest in Theraclone or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for any such shares or ownership interest, or any rights, warrants or options to acquire or with respect to any such shares of capital stock, ownership interest or convertible or exchangeable securities or take any action to cause to be exercisable any otherwise unvested Theraclone Stock Option, or cause to be vested any unvested Theraclone share-based award, under the Theraclone Stock Incentive Plan (except as otherwise provided by the terms of this Agreement or for nondiscretionary actions pursuant to the express terms of any unvested Theraclone Stock Options or unvested Theraclone share-based awards outstanding on the date of this Agreement), other than (A) issuances of Theraclone Common Shares in respect of any exercise of Theraclone Stock Options and settlement of any Theraclone share-based awards or Theraclone Warrants outstanding on the date of this Agreement (in accordance with their respective terms), or that may be granted after the date of this Agreement as permitted under this Section 6.1(b), and (B) the sale of Theraclone Common Shares pursuant to the exercise of Theraclone Stock Options to purchase Theraclone Common Shares if necessary to effectuate an optionee direction upon exercise or for withholding of Taxes;

A-54


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(vii) directly or indirectly, purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of its capital stock or any rights, warrants or options to acquire any such shares, other than purchases or deemed acquisitions of Theraclone Common Shares in respect of the exercise price or tax withholding obligations relating to a Theraclone share-based award upon the net exercise or vesting of any such award in a manner consistent with past practice;

(viii) incur, assume, guarantee, prepay, redeem, repurchase or otherwise become liable for, or modify in any material respect the terms of, any Indebtedness for borrowed money or become responsible for the Indebtedness of any person (directly, contingently or otherwise), other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice and except for (A) Indebtedness for borrowed money incurred to replace, renew, extend, refinance or refund any existing Indebtedness for borrowed money that (x) is in an amount not exceeding such existing Indebtedness, (y) is on terms no less favorable in the aggregate than such existing Indebtedness and (z) that does not contain provisions that will result in the occurrence of a default or event of default (with notice or lapse of time, or both) upon the consummation of the Merger or (B) guarantees by Theraclone of Indebtedness for borrowed money of Theraclone, which Indebtedness for borrowed money is incurred in compliance with this Section 6.1(b).

(ix) sell, lease, license, transfer, exchange or swap, mortgage or otherwise encumber (including via securitizations), or subject to any Lien (other than Permitted Liens) or otherwise dispose of (whether by merger, consolidation or acquisition of stock or assets, license or otherwise, and including by way of formation of a joint venture) any material portion of its properties or assets and except pursuant to existing agreements in effect prior to the execution of this Agreement and listed in Section 3.18 of the Theraclone Disclosure Schedule;

(x) modify, amend, terminate or waive any rights under any Theraclone Material Contract or Real Property Lease, in any manner the effect of which is, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to Theraclone;

(xi) enter into any Contract that would be a Theraclone Material Contract or Real Property Lease if in effect on the date of this Agreement, other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;

(xii) acquire (whether by merger, consolidation or acquisition of stock or assets, license or otherwise) any corporation, partnership or other business organization or division thereof or any assets, other than purchases of inventory and other assets in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;

(xiii) authorize or make any capital expenditures, other than (A) in accordance with Theraclone capital expenditures plan set forth as Section 6.1(b)(xiii) to the Theraclone Disclosure Schedule, (B) in connection with the repair or replacement of facilities destroyed or damaged due to casualty or accident (whether or not covered by insurance) and (C) otherwise in an aggregate amount for all such capital expenditures made pursuant to this clause (C) not to exceed $250,000;

(xiv) make any loans, advances or capital contributions to, or investments in, any person, in each case other than loans and advances to Theraclone;

(xv) enter into, amend, waive or terminate (other than terminations in accordance with their terms) any Theraclone Affiliate Transactions in any material respect;

(xvi) abandon, fail to maintain and renew, or otherwise let lapse, any material Intellectual Property;

(xvii) adopt or enter into a plan of complete or partial liquidation, dissolution, restructuring, recapitalization or other reorganization of Theraclone;

(xviii) (A) waive, settle, satisfy or compromise any actions, suits, arbitrations, mediations or proceedings, other than any such actions, suits, arbitrations, mediations or proceedings not in excess of $250,000 individually or in the aggregate, except for any actions, suits, arbitrations, mediations or

A-55


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

proceedings where Theraclone is the plaintiff, in which case, Theraclone made waive, settle, satisfy or compromise, provided that any such waiver, settlement, satisfaction or compromise does not result in an obligation of Theraclone to pay money or have any other obligation to the counterparty as a result thereof, or (B) waive, settle, satisfy or compromise any pending or threatened actions, suits, arbitrations, mediations or proceedings arising out of or related to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby; or

(xix) agree, in writing or otherwise, or announce an intention, to take any of the foregoing actions.

(c) Between the date of this Agreement and the earlier of the Effective Time and the Termination Date, without the prior written consent of Theraclone (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), except as set forth in Section 6.1 of the PharmAthene Disclosure Schedule or as required by applicable Law, PharmAthene shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to:

(i) authorize, declare or pay any dividends on or make any distribution with respect to its outstanding shares of capital stock (whether in cash, assets, shares or other securities of PharmAthene or its Subsidiaries), except for dividends by any wholly owned Subsidiary of PharmAthene to PharmAthene or to another wholly owned Subsidiary of PharmAthene;

(ii) split, combine or reclassify any of its capital stock or other equity securities or issue or authorize or propose the issuance of any other securities in respect of, in lieu of or in substitution for shares of its capital stock or other equity securities, except for any such transaction by a wholly owned direct or indirect Subsidiary of PharmAthene which remains a wholly owned direct or indirect Subsidiary after consummation of such transaction;

(iii) (A) other than grants to PharmAthene employees in the ordinary course of business or to a new employee in a manner consistent with past practice, grant or commit to grant any stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted stock units, deferred equity units, awards based on the value of PharmAthene Common Stock, or other equity-based awards with respect to PharmAthene Common Stock, under any equity incentive plan or otherwise, or (B) except as required by applicable Law (including section 409A of the Code and regulations issued thereunder), (1) increase or commit to increase the compensation or other benefits payable or provided to PharmAthene’s current or former directors, officers, employees, consultants, or independent contractors, (2) enter into or commit to enter into any employment, change of control, severance, retention, deferred compensation, indemnification, or similar agreement with any director, officer, employee, consultant, or independent contractor of PharmAthene, other than (I) in the ordinary course of business with respect to a new employee in a manner consistent with past practice or (II) for employment agreements terminable on less than thirty (30) days’ notice without penalty or cost, including severance, (3) add additional participants to or increase any benefits for existing participants in the severance plan adopted on May 9, 2012 and described in the PharmAthene proxy statement for the 2013 annual meeting of PharmAthene stockholders or (4) except as permitted pursuant to clause (I) or (II) above or as required pursuant to the terms of any PharmAthene Benefit Plan, establish, adopt, enter into, amend, become a party to, or commence participation in, or commit to establish, adopt, enter into, amend, become a party to, or commence participation in, any collective bargaining agreement, plan, trust, fund, policy, or arrangement, or PharmAthene Benefit Plan (or any plan, arrangement, agreement, program, practice, or policy that would be a PharmAthene Benefit Plan if it were in effect as of the date of this Agreement) for the benefit of any current or former directors, officers, employees, consultants, or independent contractors, or any of their beneficiaries;

(iv) materially change financial accounting policies or procedures or any of its methods of reporting income, deductions or other material items for financial accounting purposes, except as required by GAAP, SEC rule or policy or applicable Law;

(v) adopt any amendments to PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation or PharmAthene’s Bylaws or similar applicable charter documents of PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries;

A-56


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(vi) except for transactions among PharmAthene and its wholly owned direct or indirect Subsidiaries or among PharmAthene’s wholly owned direct or indirect Subsidiaries, issue, sell, pledge, dispose of or encumber, or authorize the issuance, sale, pledge, disposition or encumbrance of, any shares of its capital stock or other ownership interest in PharmAthene or any Subsidiaries or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for any such shares or ownership interest, or any rights, warrants or options to acquire or with respect to any such shares of capital stock, ownership interest or convertible or exchangeable securities or take any action to cause to be exercisable any otherwise unvested PharmAthene Stock Option, or cause to be vested any unvested PharmAthene share-based award, under the PharmAthene Stock Incentive Plan (except as otherwise provided by the terms of this Agreement or for nondiscretionary actions pursuant to the express terms of any unvested PharmAthene Stock Options or unvested PharmAthene share-based awards outstanding on the date of this Agreement), other than (A) issuances of PharmAthene Common Shares in respect of any exercise of PharmAthene Stock Options and settlement of any PharmAthene share-based awards outstanding on the date of this Agreement (in accordance with their respective terms), or that may be granted after the date of this Agreement as permitted under this Section 6.1(c) and (B) the sale of PharmAthene Common Stock pursuant to the exercise of PharmAthene Stock Options to purchase PharmAthene Common Stock if necessary to effectuate an optionee direction upon exercise or for withholding of Taxes;

(vii) except for transactions among PharmAthene and its wholly owned Subsidiaries or among PharmAthene’s wholly owned Subsidiaries, directly or indirectly, purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of its capital stock or any rights, warrants or options to acquire any such shares, other than purchases or deemed acquisitions of Common Shares in respect of the exercise price or tax withholding obligations relating to a PharmAthene share-based award upon the net exercise or vesting of any such award in a manner consistent with past practice;

(viii) incur, assume, guarantee, prepay, redeem, repurchase or otherwise become liable for, or modify in any material respect the terms of, any Indebtedness for borrowed money or become responsible for the Indebtedness of any person (directly, contingently or otherwise), other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice and except for (A) any intercompany Indebtedness for borrowed money among PharmAthene and its wholly owned Subsidiaries or among PharmAthene wholly owned Subsidiaries, (B) Indebtedness for borrowed money incurred to replace, renew, extend, refinance or refund any existing Indebtedness for borrowed money that (x) is in an amount not exceeding such existing Indebtedness, (y) is on terms no less favorable in the aggregate than such existing Indebtedness and (z) that does not contain provisions that will result in the occurrence of a default or event of default (with notice or lapse of time, or both) upon the consummation of the Merger or (C) guarantees by PharmAthene or one of its Subsidiaries of Indebtedness for borrowed money of PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries, which Indebtedness for borrowed money is incurred in compliance with this Section 6.1(c);

(ix) except for transactions among PharmAthene and its wholly owned Subsidiaries or among PharmAthene’s wholly owned Subsidiaries, sell, lease, license, transfer, exchange or swap, mortgage or otherwise encumber (including via securitizations), or subject to any Lien (other than Permitted Liens) or otherwise dispose of (whether by merger, consolidation or acquisition of stock or assets, license or otherwise, and including by way of formation of a joint venture) any material portion of its or its Subsidiaries’ properties or assets, including the capital stock of Subsidiaries and except pursuant to existing agreements in effect prior to the execution of this Agreement and listed in Section 4.18 of the PharmAthene Disclosure Schedule;

(x) modify, amend, terminate or waive any rights under any PharmAthene Material Contract or Real Property Lease, in any manner the effect of which is, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole;

(xi) enter into any Contract that would be a PharmAthene Material Contract or Real Property Lease if in effect on the date of this Agreement, other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;

A-57


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(xii) acquire (whether by merger, consolidation or acquisition of stock or assets, license or otherwise) any corporation, partnership or other business organization or division thereof or any assets, other than purchases of inventory and other assets in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;

(xiii) authorize or make any capital expenditures, other than (A) in accordance with PharmAthene capital expenditures plan set forth as Section 6.1(c)(xiii) of the PharmAthene Disclosure Schedule, (B) in connection with the repair or replacement of facilities destroyed or damaged due to casualty or accident (whether or not covered by insurance) and (C) otherwise in an aggregate amount for all such capital expenditures made pursuant to this clause (C) not to exceed $250,000;

(xiv) make any loans, advances or capital contributions to, or investments in, any person, in each case other than loans and advances to PharmAthene or a wholly owned Subsidiary of PharmAthene by a wholly owned Subsidiary of PharmAthene, or loans, advances, capital contributions to, or investments in, a wholly owned Subsidiary of PharmAthene;

(xv) enter into, amend, waive or terminate (other than terminations in accordance with their terms) any PharmAthene Affiliate Transaction in any material respect;

(xvi) abandon, fail to maintain and renew, or otherwise let lapse, any material Intellectual Property;

(xvii) adopt or enter into a plan of complete or partial liquidation, dissolution, restructuring, recapitalization or other reorganization of PharmAthene, or any of its Subsidiaries (other than the Merger or a merger of two or more wholly owned Subsidiaries of PharmAthene);

(xviii) (A) waive, settle, satisfy or compromise any actions, suits, arbitrations, mediations or proceedings, other than any such actions, suits, arbitrations, mediations or proceedings not in excess of $250,000 individually or in the aggregate, except for any actions, suits, arbitrations, mediations or proceedings where PharmAthene is the plaintiff, in which case, PharmAthene may waive, settle, satisfy or compromise, provided that any such waiver, settlement, satisfaction or compromise does not result in an obligation of PharmAthene to pay money or have any other obligation to the counterparty as a result thereof without restriction or (B) waive, settle, satisfy or compromise any pending or threatened action, suits, arbitrations, mediations or proceedings arising out of or related to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby; or

(xix) agree, in writing or otherwise, or announce an intention, to take any of the foregoing actions.

(d) Between the date of this Agreement and the earlier of the Effective Time and the Termination Date, PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries shall:

(i) prepare and timely file all Tax Returns required to be filed by it (or them) on or before the Closing Date (“PharmAthene Post-Signing Returns”) in a manner consistent with past practice, except as otherwise required by a change in applicable Law;

(ii) consult with Theraclone with respect to all material closing agreements, issue resolution agreements and other agreements or confirmations to be executed or entered into or received by PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries with or from the IRS;

(iii) fully and timely pay all material Taxes due and payable in respect of such PharmAthene Post-Signing Returns that are so filed, or for any such Taxes as to which there is a good faith dispute, provide for adequate reserves on the financial statements of PharmAthene;

(iv) properly reserve (and reflect such reserve in their books and records and financial statements), for all Taxes payable by them for which no PharmAthene Post-Signing Return is due prior to the Closing Date in a manner consistent with past practice;

A-58


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(v) promptly notify Theraclone of any material actions, suits, arbitrations, mediations or proceedings or audit pending or threatened against PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries in respect of any material Tax matter, including Tax liabilities and refund claims;

(vi) not make (except in the ordinary course of business) or revoke any material election with regard to Taxes or file any material amended Tax Returns, without the prior written consent of Theraclone;

(vii) not make (except in the ordinary course of business) any change in any Tax or accounting methods or systems of internal accounting controls (including procedures with respect to the payment of accounts payable and collection of accounts receivable), except as may be appropriate to conform to changes in Tax Laws or regulatory accounting requirements, without the prior written consent of Theraclone;

(viii) terminate all Tax allocation, indemnification or sharing agreements to which PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries is a party such that there are no further liabilities thereunder (other than any such agreements solely among PharmAthene and any of its Subsidiaries); and

(ix) maintain its existing listing on NYSE MKT LLC and file or furnish all forms, documents and reports required to be filed or furnished with the SEC, which forms, documents and reports shall comply in all material respects with the requirements of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, as the case may be, and the applicable rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and none of such forms, documents and reports shall contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.

(e) Between the date of this Agreement and the earlier of the Effective Time and the Termination Date, Theraclone shall:

(i) prepare and timely file all Tax Returns required to be filed by it (or them) on or before the Closing Date (“Theraclone Post-Signing Returns”) in a manner consistent with past practice, except as otherwise required by a change in applicable Law;

(ii) consult with PharmAthene with respect to all material closing agreements, issue resolution agreements and other agreements or confirmations to be executed or entered into or received by Theraclone or any of its Subsidiaries with or from the IRS;

(iii) fully and timely pay all material Taxes due and payable in respect of such Theraclone Post-Signing Returns that are so filed, or for any such Taxes as to which there is a good faith dispute, provide for adequate reserves on the financial statements of Theraclone;

(iv) properly reserve (and reflect such reserve in their books and records and financial statements), for all Taxes payable by them for which no Theraclone Post-Signing Return is due prior to the Closing Date in a manner consistent with past practice;

(v) promptly notify PharmAthene of any material actions, suits, arbitrations, mediations or proceedings or audit pending or threatened against Theraclone or any of its Subsidiaries in respect of any material Tax matter, including Tax liabilities and refund claims;

(vi) not make (except in the ordinary course of business) or revoke any material election with regard to Taxes or file any material amended Tax Returns, without the prior written consent of PharmAthene;

(vii) not make (except in the ordinary course of business) or any change in any Tax or accounting methods or systems of internal accounting controls (including procedures with respect to the payment of accounts payable and collection of accounts receivable), except as may be appropriate to conform to changes in Tax Laws or regulatory accounting requirements, without the prior written consent of PharmAthene; and

A-59


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(viii) terminate all Tax allocation, indemnification or sharing agreements to which Theraclone or any of its Subsidiaries is a party such that there are no further liabilities thereunder (other than any such agreements solely among Theraclone and any of its Subsidiaries).

(f) Between the date of this Agreement and the earlier of the Effective Time and the Termination Date, Merger Sub shall not, without the prior written consent of Theraclone: (i) issue, sell, deliver or agree or commit to issue, sell or deliver (whether through the issuance or granting of options, warrants, commitments, subscriptions, rights to purchase or otherwise) any equity securities of Merger Sub, (ii) incur any obligations or liabilities or enter into any Contract other than in furtherance of the transactions contemplated hereby or (iii) authorize any of, or commit or agree to take, any of the foregoing actions.

Section 6.2 Investigation.  Prior to the earlier of the Effective Time and the Termination Date, each of PharmAthene and Theraclone shall afford to the other party and to each of the other party’s officers, employees, accountants, consultants, legal counsel, financial advisors, prospective financing sources (and their advisors) and agents and other representatives (collectively, “Representatives”) reasonable access upon at least one Business Day’s prior notice during normal business hours to its (and its Subsidiaries’, if applicable) officers, properties, contracts, commitments, books and records and any report, schedule or other document filed or received by it pursuant to the requirements of applicable Laws and shall furnish the other party and their respective Representatives with financial, operating and other data and information as the other party may from time to time reasonably request. Without limiting the generality of any of the foregoing, until the earlier of the Effective Time and the Termination Date, each of PharmAthene and Theraclone shall promptly make available to the other party copies of:

(a) the unaudited monthly consolidated balance sheets of such party as of the end of each calendar month and the related unaudited monthly consolidated statements of operations, statements of stockholders’ equity and statements of cash flows for such calendar month, which shall be delivered within twenty days after the end of such calendar month, or such longer periods as the parties may mutually agree to in writing;

(b) the unaudited quarterly consolidated balance sheets of such party as of the end of each calendar quarter and the related unaudited quarterly consolidated statements of operations, statements of stockholders’ equity and statements of cash flows for such calendar quarter, reviewed by such party’s independent auditor, which shall be delivered within forty days after the end of such calendar quarter, or such longer periods as the parties may mutually agree to in writing;

(c) any notice, report or other document filed with or otherwise furnished, submitted or sent to any Governmental Entity on behalf of a party in connection with the Merger or any of the transaction contemplated hereby;

(d) any non-privileged notice, document or other communication sent by or on behalf of, or sent to, a party relating to any pending or threatened actions, suits, arbitrations, mediations or proceedings pending involving or affecting such party;

(e) any material notice, report or other document received by a party from any Governmental Entity;

(f) with respect to PharmAthene, (i) any quarterly report on Form 10-Q, annual report on Form 10-K, proxy statement, information statement or other similar document required to be filed or furnished with the SEC at least five days prior to the date of such filing and (ii) all current reports on Form 8-K to be filed or furnished with the SEC at least 24 hours prior to the date of such filing and, in each case, give Theraclone the opportunity to review and provide comments, which shall be reasonably considered by PharmAthene.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither party shall be required to afford such access to the extent it would unreasonably disrupt the operations of such party or any of such party’s Subsidiaries, would cause a violation of any agreement to which such party or any of such party’s Subsidiaries is a party (although each party shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain any necessary consent so that such violation would not occur), would cause a reasonable risk of a loss of a privilege to such party or any of such party’s Subsidiaries or

A-60


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

would constitute a violation of any applicable Law, nor shall such party or any of its Representatives be permitted to perform any onsite procedure (including any onsite environmental study) with respect to any property of the other party or any of its Subsidiaries. The parties agree that no information discovered by any party or its Representatives in the course of any investigation pursuant to this Section 6.2 or otherwise shall be deemed to modify or waive any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement of the other party contained in this Agreement.

Section 6.3 No Solicitation.

(a) Each of PharmAthene, its Subsidiaries and their respective Representatives will (i) immediately cease and cause to be terminated any and all existing activities, discussions or negotiations with any Persons conducted prior to or on the date of this Agreement with respect to any PharmAthene Takeover Proposal and (ii) promptly (and in any event within one (1) Business Day after the date hereof) request the prompt return from all such Persons or cause the destruction of all copies of all information or data previously provided to such Persons by PharmAthene or its Representatives, as applicable, in accordance with the provisions of the confidentiality or non-disclosure agreement governing PharmAthene’s arrangements with such Person and shall deny access to any virtual data room containing any such information to any party (other than Theraclone and its Representatives). If any Representative of PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries, in his or her capacity as such, takes any action that PharmAthene is obligated not to authorize or permit such Representative to take, then such action shall be attributed to PharmAthene.

(b) From the date of this Agreement until the earlier of the Effective Time and the Termination Date, PharmAthene shall not, nor shall it permit any of its Subsidiaries to, nor shall it authorize or permit any officer, director or employee of or any other Representative of, PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, (i) solicit, initiate or knowingly encourage the submission of any inquiries concerning, or the making of any proposal or offer that constitutes, or could reasonably be expected to lead to, a PharmAthene Takeover Proposal, (ii) enter into any agreement, letter of intent, agreement in principle or other similar instrument with respect to any PharmAthene Takeover Proposal, (iii) provide any non-public information regarding PharmAthene or its Subsidiaries to any third party or engage in any negotiations or discussions in connection with any PharmAthene Takeover Proposal or otherwise knowingly cooperate with or assist or participate in or knowingly encourage any such negotiations or discussions, (iv) approve or recommend a PharmAthene Takeover Proposal, or resolve or authorize an intention to approve or recommend, or execute or enter into, any Acquisition Agreement, (v) submit to the stockholders of PharmAthene for their approval or adoption any PharmAthene Takeover Proposal, (vi) withdraw, rescind, qualify or modify, or propose publicly to withdraw, rescind, qualify or modify, in a manner adverse to Theraclone, the PharmAthene Recommendation or the approval by the PharmAthene Board of Directors or such committee of this Agreement or the Merger or resolve or authorize an intention to do any of the foregoing, (vii) if a tender offer or exchange offer for shares of capital stock of PharmAthene that constitutes an PharmAthene Takeover Proposal is commenced, fail to publicly recommend against acceptance of such tender offer or exchange offer by the stockholders of PharmAthene (taking no position with respect to the acceptance of such tender offer or exchange offer by the stockholders of PharmAthene, shall constitute a failure to recommend against acceptance of such tender offer or exchange offer) within ten (10) Business Days after commencement thereof or fail to reaffirm the PharmAthene Recommendation within four (4) Business Days after Theraclone so requests in writing, (viii) approve (by resolution of the PharmAthene Board of Directors, any committee thereof or otherwise), support, enter into or adopt or recommend to any holders of PharmAthene Shares, or propose any of the foregoing with respect to, any letter of intent or similar document, Contract, commitment or agreement in principle (whether written or oral, binding or nonbinding) that may reasonably be expected to cause PharmAthene to abandon, terminate or fail to consummate this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby or (ix) agree or publicly announce any intention to take any of the foregoing actions (any of the foregoing in clauses (i) through (ix), inclusive, a “PharmAthene Recommendation Withdrawal”); provided, that the PharmAthene Board of Directors may, at any time prior to Closing, (x) in response to an unsolicited, bona fide, written PharmAthene Superior Proposal that was made in circumstances not involving a breach of this Section 6.3 if the PharmAthene Board of Directors

A-61


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

reasonably determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside counsel and its outside financial advisor, that failing to take the following action would be a breach of its fiduciary duties under applicable Law, (I) effect a PharmAthene Recommendation Withdrawal or (II) terminate this Agreement in accordance with Section 8.1(h) or (y) in the event that, after the date hereof, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware shall have rendered a substantive decision on the merits in that certain litigation matter between PharmAthene and SIGA Technologies, Inc., and, within twenty (20) business days after the entry of such decision, the PharmAthene Board of Directors determines, in its reasonable discretion, that, as a result of such decision, it can no longer consider the Merger a merger of equals (the “Transaction Event”), (I) effect a PharmAthene Recommendation Withdrawal or (II) terminate this Agreement in accordance with Section 8.1(h) (“Transaction Event Withdrawal”).

(c) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in Section 6.3(a), if at any time prior to obtaining the PharmAthene Stockholder Approval and prior to the occurrence of a Transaction Event, (i) PharmAthene has received a bona fide written PharmAthene Takeover Proposal from a third party that did not result from a breach of this Section 6.3 that is conditioned on PharmAthene not entering into the Merger, and (ii) the PharmAthene Board of Directors reasonably determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside financial advisor and its outside counsel, that such PharmAthene Takeover Proposal constitutes or would reasonably be expected to result in a PharmAthene Superior Proposal then, if the PharmAthene Board of Directors determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside financial advisor and its outside counsel, that the failure to take the following action would be reasonably likely to result in a breach of the fiduciary duties of the PharmAthene Board of Directors under applicable Law, then PharmAthene or its Representatives may, subject to PharmAthene’s providing prior written notice to Theraclone of its decision to take such action and compliance by PharmAthene with this Section 6.3(c) and Section 6.3(d), (A) provide information regarding PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries to the person or persons making such PharmAthene Takeover Proposal and their respective Representatives and financing sources and (B) engage in negotiations or discussions with the person or persons making such PharmAthene Takeover Proposal and their respective Representatives and financing sources, subject, in each case, to (x) the person or persons making the PharmAthene Takeover Proposal entering into, or are otherwise being made subject to, an Acceptable PharmAthene Confidentiality Agreement (a copy of which shall promptly, and in any event within 24 hours following execution thereof, be provided to Theraclone) and (y) PharmAthene providing prior written notice to Theraclone of any non-public information provided to such person or persons making such PharmAthene Takeover Proposal or their respective Representatives or financing sources and concurrently with the delivery to such person (in the case of written information) or promptly (in the case of information delivered orally) deliver to Theraclone all such information that is non-public and that was not previously provided to Theraclone.

(d) PharmAthene shall promptly (and in any event within one (1) Business Day) notify Theraclone in the event it receives a PharmAthene Takeover Proposal or any request or inquiry that could reasonably be expected to lead to a PharmAthene Takeover Proposal from any person or persons, including by notifying Theraclone of the identity of the person or persons making such PharmAthene Takeover Proposal, request or inquiry and the material terms and conditions thereof. PharmAthene shall inform Theraclone on a prompt and current basis (and in any event within one (1) Business Day) of the status and material details of any such request or inquiry, including any change in the material terms or conditions of a PharmAthene Takeover Proposal (it being understood that any change in the type, amount or quantity of the merger consideration shall be deemed to be a change in a material term) and promptly (and in any event within one (1) Business Day) provide Theraclone with copies of any written PharmAthene Takeover Proposals received by PharmAthene. Promptly upon determination by the PharmAthene Board of Directors that a PharmAthene Takeover Proposal constitutes a PharmAthene Superior Proposal in accordance with Section 6.3(d), PharmAthene shall deliver to Theraclone a written notice advising Theraclone that the PharmAthene Board of Directors has so determined, specifying the material terms and conditions of such PharmAthene Superior Proposal (including the terms of the consideration that the holders of PharmAthene Common Stock will receive per share of shares of PharmAthene Common Stock and including any written agreement providing for a PharmAthene Superior Proposal and the identity of the person or persons making such PharmAthene Superior Proposal). In addition, PharmAthene Board of Directors shall not make a PharmAthene Recommendation Withdrawal or terminate this Agreement for purposes of

A-62


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

entering into an agreement with respect to an PharmAthene Superior Proposal unless (x) PharmAthene notifies Theraclone, in writing at least three (3) Business Days before taking such action, of its intention to do so in response to an offer, proposal or inquiry to enter into a PharmAthene Takeover Proposal that it has determined, after consultation with its outside financial advisor and its outside counsel, that such PharmAthene Takeover Proposal constitutes a PharmAthene Superior Proposal and attaching the most current version of any proposed agreement or a summary of all material terms of any such proposal and the identity of the offeror, (y) PharmAthene shall have, during such three (3) Business Day period, negotiated in good faith with Theraclone with respect to any changes to this Agreement that Theraclone shall have proposed and (z) Theraclone does not make, within three (3) Business Days after its receipt of that written notification, an offer that is at least as favorable to the stockholders of PharmAthene as such PharmAthene Superior Proposal, it being understood that PharmAthene shall not enter into any binding agreement with respect to such Superior Proposal during such three (3) Business Day period. If, following execution by the parties hereto of an amendment to this Agreement providing for revisions to the terms of the transactions as completed by this Agreement that obviate the need for a PharmAthene Recommendation Withdrawal in connection with a PharmAthene Superior Proposal, such PharmAthene Superior Proposal is revised (on one or more occasions), or PharmAthene receives a PharmAthene Superior Proposal from another person, then the provisions of this Section 6.3(d) shall be applicable with respect to each such PharmAthene Recommendation Withdrawal relating to any such amended or additional PharmAthene Superior Proposal.

(e) Nothing contained in this Agreement shall prohibit PharmAthene or the PharmAthene Board of Directors from taking and disclosing to the stockholders a position contemplated by Rules 14d-9 and 14e-2(a) promulgated under the Exchange Act with respect to a tender or exchange offer by a third party only if the PharmAthene Board of Directors determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside financial advisor and its outside counsel, that failure to make such disclosure would be reasonably likely to result in a breach of the fiduciary duties of the PharmAthene Board of Directors under applicable Law; provided, however, that (i) in no event shall PharmAthene or the PharmAthene Board of Directors take, or agree or resolve to take, any action that would constitute a PharmAthene Recommendation Withdrawal other than in compliance with this Section 6.3 and (ii) any such position or disclosure in connection with a tender offer or exchange offer other than a recommendation against such offer or a customary “stop, look and listen” communication of the type contemplated by Rule 14d-9(f) under the Exchange Act, in each case that includes a reaffirmation of the PharmAthene Recommendation and a reaffirmation of the approval by the PharmAthene Board of Directors of the Merger and this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby and the actions taken in connection herewith, shall be deemed to be an PharmAthene Recommendation Withdrawal.

(f) PharmAthene and its Affiliates shall not grant a waiver or release under any other standstill agreement in effect on the date hereof or amend, modify or grant permission under any provision thereof; provided that PharmAthene shall be permitted to grant a waiver or release under any other standstill agreement in effect on the date hereof solely to the extent necessary to permit the Person subject to such standstill agreement to make and engage in discussions with respect to, and negotiate, a PharmAthene Takeover Proposal that is conditioned on entering into mutually satisfactory definitive documentation with PharmAthene in response to an unsolicited, bona fide, written request from such Person that was made in circumstances not involving a breach of this Section 6.3, but only if the PharmAthene Board of Directors reasonably determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside financial advisor and its outside counsel, that failure to take such action would be reasonably likely to result in a breach of the fiduciary duties of the PharmAthene Board of Directors under applicable Law. PharmAthene shall provide written notice to Theraclone of the waiver or release of any standstill by PharmAthene promptly (and in any event within 24 hours) following such waiver or release, which notice shall include the identity of the Person or group receiving the waiver or release.

Section 6.4 Filings; Other Actions.

(a) Each of Theraclone, PharmAthene and Merger Sub shall use reasonable best efforts to take or cause to be taken such actions as may be required to be taken under the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, any other federal securities Laws, any applicable state securities or “blue sky” Laws and any stock

A-63


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

exchange requirements in connection with the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement. Without limiting the foregoing, as promptly as practicable after the date of this Agreement, the parties hereto shall prepare and cause to be filed with the SEC the Proxy Statement and the Form S-4 Registration Statement, in which the Proxy Statement will be included as a prospectus; provided, however, that prior to the filing of the Proxy Statement and the Form S-4 Registration Statement, PharmAthene shall consult with Theraclone with respect to such filings and shall afford Theraclone and its Representatives reasonable opportunity to comment thereon. The parties hereto shall use reasonable best efforts to cause the Proxy Statement to be mailed to PharmAthene’s stockholders and Theraclone’s stockholders, all as promptly as reasonably practicable after the date on which the Form S-4 Registration Statement is declared effective under the Securities Act (the “S-4 Effective Date”). Theraclone shall provide PharmAthene with any information for inclusion in the Proxy Statement and the Form S-4 Registration Statement that may be required under applicable Law or that is reasonably requested by PharmAthene. PharmAthene shall notify Theraclone of the receipt of comments from the SEC and of any request from the SEC for amendments or supplements to the Proxy Statement, the Form S-4 Registration Statement or for additional information, and will promptly supply to Theraclone copies of all correspondence between PharmAthene or its Representatives, on the one hand, and the SEC or members of its staff, on the other hand, with respect to the Proxy Statement, the Form S-4 Registration Statement or the Merger. Each of Theraclone, PharmAthene and Merger Sub shall use reasonable best efforts to resolve all SEC comments with respect to the Proxy Statement, the Form S-4 Registration Statement and any other required filings as promptly as practicable after receipt thereof. Each of Theraclone, PharmAthene and Merger Sub agree to correct any information provided by it for use in the Proxy Statement or the Form S-4 Registration Statement, which shall have become false or misleading in any material respect. Theraclone will promptly notify the PharmAthene if at any time prior to the PharmAthene Meeting any event should occur which is required by applicable Law to be set forth in an amendment of, or a supplement to, the Proxy Statement or the Form S-4 Registration Statement. In such case, the parties will cooperate to promptly prepare and file such amendment or supplement with the SEC to the extent required by applicable Law and will mail such amendment or supplement to PharmAthene’s stockholders to the extent required by applicable Law; provided, however, that prior to such filing, each party shall consult with each other party with respect to such amendment or supplement and shall afford each such party and its Representatives reasonable opportunity to comment thereon. Notwithstanding the forgoing, no party shall have any obligation to notify the other parties of any matters to the extent that its board of directors or any committee thereof determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel, that to do so would be inconsistent with the directors’ exercise of their fiduciary obligations to its stockholders under applicable Law.

(b) PharmAthene shall include in the Proxy Statement the recommendation of PharmAthene’s board of directors that its stockholders approve an amendment to PharmAthene’s bylaws (the “PharmAthene Bylaw Amendment”) that provides that effective as of effective time of the appointment of Clifford J. Stocks as PharmAthene’s Chief Executive Officer and until the Board Change Date, Mr. Stocks may not be removed from such office, unless his removal is approved by at least sixty six and two-thirds percent (66 2/3%) of the then-serving members of the PharmAthene’s board of directors. At any time after the Resigning PharmAthene Board Designee Resignation Date, Mr. Stocks may be removed from the office of Chief Executive Officer of PharmAthene by at least a majority of the then-serving members of the PharmAthene’s board of directors. For purposes hereof, the “Board Change Date” means the earlier of (i) the second anniversary of the date hereof, and (ii) such time as there is a period longer than thirty (30) days in which less than five (5) of (A) the PharmAthene Board Designees or (B) any member of the PharmAthene board of directors who replaces any of the PharmAthene Board Designees and was nominated by the remaining PharmAthene Board Designees pursuant to the Board Composition Agreement are then incumbent on the PharmAthene board of directors.

(c) Subject to the other provisions of this Agreement, not sooner than a reasonable period after the S-4 Effective Date, but prior to the PharmAthene Shareholder Meeting, promptly after the S-4 Effective Date, Theraclone shall take all action necessary in accordance with the DGCL and the Theraclone Certificate of Incorporation and Theraclone Bylaws to solicit approval by written consent from

A-64


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone’s stockholders for the purpose of obtaining the Theraclone Stockholder Approval (the “Theraclone Stockholder Written Consent”).

(d) Subject to the other provisions of this Agreement, PharmAthene shall (i) take all action necessary in accordance with the DGCL and PharmAthene’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws to duly call, give notice of, convene and hold a meeting of its stockholders as promptly as reasonably practicable following the mailing of the Proxy Statement for the purpose of obtaining the PharmAthene Stockholder Approval (the “PharmAthene Meeting”) (including mailing the Proxy Statement as soon as reasonably practicable after the S-4 Effective Date and holding the PharmAthene Meeting no later than 40 days after mailing the Proxy Statement, unless a later date is mutually agreed by Theraclone and by PharmAthene), (ii) include in the Proxy Statement the recommendation of PharmAthene’s board of directors that its stockholders grant the PharmAthene Stockholder Approval and (iii) use all reasonable best efforts to solicit from its stockholders proxies to secure the PharmAthene Stockholder Approval. PharmAthene shall, in its capacity as the sole stockholder of Merger Sub, approve this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby.

Section 6.5 Benefit Plans.

(a) With respect to any Theraclone Benefit Plan or PharmAthene Benefit Plan in which any employees and former employees of Theraclone (the “Participating Employees”) first become eligible to participate on or after the Effective Time, and in which such Participating Employees did not participate prior to the Effective Time (collectively, the “New Plans”), each Participating Employee shall, to the extent permitted by applicable law, receive full credit for the years of continuous service by such Participating Employee recognized by Theraclone prior to the Effective Time to the same extent as if it were service with PharmAthene for purposes of (1) satisfying the service requirements for eligibility to participate in each such New Plan, (2) vesting in any benefits under each such New Plan, and (3) calculating the level of benefits with respect to vacation, personal days off, severance benefits and any other welfare-type benefits with respect to which a Participating Employee may be eligible, where service is a factor in calculating benefits, provided that, none of the foregoing shall apply with respect to defined benefit pension plans benefit accrual or where such credit would result in a duplication of benefits. With respect to any New Plan that is a welfare benefit plan in which any Participating Employees first become eligible to participate on or after the Effective Time, and in which such Participating Employees did not participate prior to the Effective Time, subject to any applicable plan provisions, contractual requirements or laws, PharmAthene shall, (A) cause to be waived any eligibility requirements or pre-existing condition limitations except to the extent such eligibility requirements, waiting periods, any evidence of insurability requirements or pre-existing conditions would apply under the analogous Theraclone Benefit Plan or PharmAthene Benefit Plan in which any such Participating Employee was a participant or eligible to participate as of immediately prior to the Effective Time, and (B) give effect, in determining any deductibles, co-insurance or maximum out of pocket limitations, to amounts paid by such Participating Employees prior to the Effective Time under a Theraclone Benefit Plan or PharmAthene Benefit Plan in which any such Participating Employee was a participant as of immediately prior to the Effective Time (to the same extent that such credit was given under such Theraclone Benefit Plan or PharmAthene Benefit Plan prior to the Effective Time) in satisfying such requirements during the plan year in which the Effective Time occurs.

(b) If requested by PharmAthene at least ten business days prior to the Closing Date, Theraclone shall take (or cause to be taken) all actions reasonably necessary pursuant to resolutions of the Theraclone Board of Directors necessary or appropriate to terminate, effective no later than the day prior to the Closing Date, any defined contribution Theraclone Benefit Plan that contains a cash or deferred arrangement, whether intended to qualify under section 401(k) of the Code or otherwise (a “Theraclone Defined Contribution Plan”). If Theraclone is required to terminate any Theraclone Defined Contribution Plan, then Theraclone shall provide to PharmAthene prior to the Closing Date written evidence of the adoption by the Theraclone Board of Directors of resolutions authorizing the termination of such Theraclone Defined Contribution Plan (the form and substance of which resolutions shall be subject to the prior reasonable review and approval of PharmAthene, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed).

A-65


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(c) Nothing contained in this Section 6.5, express or implied, (1) shall be construed to establish, amend, or modify any benefit plan, program, agreement or arrangement, including without limitation, any Theraclone Benefit Plan or any PharmAthene Benefit Plan, (2) shall alter or limit the ability of any of PharmAthene, Merger Sub, Theraclone, the Surviving Subsidiary, or, with respect to PharmAthene, its Subsidiaries to amend, modify, or terminate any benefit plan, program, agreement, or arrangement at any time assumed, established, sponsored, or maintained by any of them, (3) is intended to confer upon any current or former employee any right to employment or continued employment for any period of time by reason of this Agreement, or any right to a particular term or condition of employment, or (4) is intended to confer upon any person (including for the avoidance of doubt any current or former employee) any right as a third-party beneficiary of this Agreement.

(d) To the maximum extent permitted by Law, PharmAthene and Theraclone shall treat, and cause their respective affiliates to treat, the U.S. federal and state income tax deductions resulting from any severance payments and any other compensatory payments arising as a result of the transactions contemplated hereby that are, in each case, made on the Closing Date as accruing on the day after the Closing pursuant to the “next day” rule of Treasury Regulation section 1.1502-76(b)(1)(ii)(B) or any similar provision of state or local Tax Law.

Section 6.6 Reasonable Best Efforts.

(a) Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, and except where a different standard of effort is provided in this Agreement, each of the parties hereto shall use (and cause its affiliates to use) its reasonable best efforts (subject to, and in accordance with, applicable Law) to take promptly, or cause to be taken promptly, all actions, and to do promptly, or cause to be done promptly, and to assist and cooperate with the other parties in doing, all things necessary, proper or advisable under applicable Laws to consummate and make effective the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including (i) obtaining all necessary actions or nonactions, waivers, consents and approvals, including the Theraclone Approvals, from Governmental Entities and making all necessary registrations and filings, (ii) obtaining all necessary consents, approvals or waivers from third parties and (iii) executing and delivering any additional instruments necessary to consummate the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

(b) If any administrative or judicial action or proceeding or any proceeding or action by a private party, is instituted (or threatened to be instituted) challenging any transaction contemplated by this Agreement and/or seeking to restrain, enjoin or otherwise prohibit the consummation of the Merger, each of Theraclone and PharmAthene shall cooperate in all respects with each other and shall use their respective reasonable best efforts to contest and resist any such action or proceeding and to have vacated, lifted, reversed or overturned any decree, judgment, injunction or other order, whether temporary, preliminary or permanent, that is in effect and that prohibits, prevents or restricts consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other provision of this Agreement, nothing in this Section 6.6 shall limit a party’s right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(c) so long as such party has, prior to such termination, complied with its obligations under this Section 6.6.

Section 6.7 Takeover Statute.  If any “fair price,” “moratorium,” “control share acquisition” or other form of antitakeover statute or regulation shall become applicable to the transactions contemplated hereby, each party hereto and the members of their respective boards of directors shall, to the extent permitted by applicable Law, grant such approvals and take such actions as are reasonably necessary so that the transactions contemplated hereby may be consummated as promptly as practicable on the terms contemplated hereby and otherwise act to eliminate or minimize the effects of such statute or regulation on the transactions contemplated hereby.

Section 6.8 Public Announcements; Confidentiality.  Except as explicitly provided in Section 6.3, Theraclone and PharmAthene shall consult with and provide each other the reasonable opportunity to review and comment upon any press release or other public statement or comment prior to the issuance of such press release or other public statement or comment relating to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and neither shall issue any such press release or other public statement or comment without the

A-66


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

other’s prior consultation, except as may be required by applicable Law or by the rules or regulations of the SEC or any applicable national securities exchange. PharmAthene and Theraclone agree to issue a joint press release announcing this Agreement upon the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. The parties hereto acknowledge that PharmAthene and Theraclone have previously executed the Confidentiality Agreement and agree that the Confidentiality Agreement shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

Section 6.9 Indemnification and Insurance.

(a) PharmAthene and the Surviving Subsidiary shall indemnify the current and former directors, officers, employees and agents of Theraclone and any other employees who have executed individual indemnity agreements as set forth on Section 6.9(a) of the Theraclone Disclosure Schedule (an “Indemnified Party”) for all claims, losses, liabilities, damages, judgments, fines and reasonable fees, costs and expenses, including attorneys’ fees and disbursements, incurred in connection with any claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, arising out of or pertaining to the fact that the Indemnified Party is or was an officer, director, employee or agent of Theraclone or, while a director or officer of Theraclone, is or was serving at the request of Theraclone or as a director, officer, employee or agent of another person, whether asserted or claimed prior to, at or after the Effective Time, to the fullest extent permitted by Law, and such obligations shall survive the Merger, and shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with their respective terms from the Effective Time, until the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations with respect to any claims against such Indemnified Parties arising out of such acts or omissions. Each Indemnified Party will be entitled to advancement of expenses (including attorneys’ fees) incurred in the defense of any such claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation from each of PharmAthene and the Surviving Subsidiary within ten Business Days of receipt by PharmAthene or the Surviving Subsidiary from the Indemnified Party of a request therefor; provided that any Indemnified Party to whom expenses are advanced provides an undertaking, to the extent required by the DGCL, to repay such advances if it is determined by a final determination of a court of competent jurisdiction (which determination is not subject to appeal) that such Indemnified Party is not entitled to indemnification under applicable Law. The certificate of incorporation and by-laws of the Surviving Subsidiary shall contain provisions no less favorable with respect to indemnification, advancement of expenses and exculpation of former and present officers, directors, employees and agents than are set forth in the Theraclone Certificate of Incorporation and the Theraclone Bylaws, as of the date of this Agreement, which provisions shall not be amended, repealed or otherwise modified, except as required by applicable Law, for a period of six years from the Effective Time, in any manner that would adversely affect the rights thereunder of any such individuals.

(b) Theraclone may obtain at or prior to the Effective Time, prepaid (so-called “tail”) directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policies in respect of acts or omissions occurring at or prior to the Effective Time for six years from the Effective Time covering each Indemnified Party; provided, however, that, without the prior written consent of PharmAthene, Theraclone may not expend for any twelve (12) month period therefor in excess of 300% of the amount paid by Theraclone for coverage for the period of twelve (12) months beginning on January 1, 2012. If Theraclone does not obtain “tail” insurance as contemplated by the immediately preceding sentence, then, for a period of six (6) years from the Effective Time PharmAthene shall cause the Surviving Subsidiary to maintain in effect the current policies of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance and fiduciary liability insurance maintained by Theraclone with respect to matters arising on or before the Effective Time; provided, however, that after the Effective Time the Surviving Subsidiary shall not be required to pay annual premiums in excess of 300% of the last annual premium paid by Theraclone prior to the date of this Agreement in respect of the coverages required to be obtained pursuant hereto, but in such case shall purchase as much coverage as is reasonably available for such amount.

(c) The provisions of this Section 6.9 shall survive the consummation of the Merger and expressly are intended to benefit, and are enforceable by, each of the Indemnified Parties.

(d) If PharmAthene, the Surviving Subsidiary or any of their respective successors or assigns (i) consolidates with or merges into any other person and shall not be the continuing or surviving

A-67


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

corporation or entity in such consolidation or merger or (ii) transfers all or substantially all of its properties and assets to any person, then, and in either such case, proper provision shall be made so that the successors and assigns of PharmAthene or the Surviving Subsidiary, as the case may be, shall assume the obligations set forth in this Section 6.9.

(e) If any Indemnified Party makes any claim for indemnification or advancement of expenses under this Section 6.9 that is denied by PharmAthene or the Surviving Subsidiary, and a court of competent jurisdiction determines that the Indemnified Party is entitled to such indemnification or advancement of expenses, then PharmAthene or the Surviving Subsidiary shall pay the Indemnified Party’s costs and expenses, including reasonable legal fees and expenses, incurred by the Indemnified Party in connection with pursuing his or her claims to the fullest extent permitted by Law.

(f) The provisions of this Section 6.9 are intended to be in addition to the rights otherwise available to the current officers, directors, employees and agents of Theraclone by Law, charter, statute, by-law or agreement.

Section 6.10 Control of Operations.  Nothing contained in this Agreement shall give PharmAthene, directly or indirectly, the right to control or direct Theraclone operations prior to the Effective Time. Prior to the Effective Time, Theraclone shall exercise, consistent with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, complete control and supervision over its operations. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall give Theraclone, directly or indirectly, the right to control or direct PharmAthene’s operations prior to the Effective Time. Prior to the Effective Time, PharmAthene shall exercise, consistent with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, complete control and supervision over its operations.

Section 6.11 No Other Representations or Warranties.  Except for the representations and warranties contained in Article III, neither Theraclone nor any person on behalf of Theraclone makes any other express or implied representation or warranty with respect to Theraclone or with respect to any other information provided to PharmAthene or Merger Sub in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. Except for the representations and warranties contained in Article IV, none of PharmAthene or Merger Sub or any other person on behalf of PharmAthene or Merger Sub makes any other express or implied representation or warranty with respect to PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries or with respect to any other information provided to Theraclone in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby.

Section 6.12 Stock Exchange Listing.  PharmAthene shall use its reasonable best efforts to cause the shares of PharmAthene Common Stock to be issued in the Merger to be approved for listing on NYSE MKT LLC, subject to official notice of issuance, prior to the Effective Time.

Section 6.13 PharmAthene Board.

(a) PharmAthene shall take all requisite action to cause, effective as of the Effective Time, the board of directors of PharmAthene to consist of nine (9) members, five (5) of whom shall be current directors of PharmAthene (each such person, a “PharmAthene Board Designee”), three (3) of whom shall be the persons identified in Section 6.13 of the Theraclone Disclosure Schedule (each such person, a “Theraclone Board Designee”) and the remaining seat shall be vacant. After the Effective Time, the composition of the Board shall be determined in accordance with the Board Composition Agreement.

(b) PharmAthene acknowledges that the Board Composition Agreement that will be entered into by the Theraclone Shareholders and the PharmAthene Approving PharmAthene Stockholders at Closing will act:

(i) to cause the initial vacancy on the PharmAthene board of directors to be filled at Closing or as soon as possible thereafter by a nominee (the “Fourth Theraclone Director”) approved by a majority of the then-serving Theraclone Board Designees;

(ii) to cause one of the PharmAthene Board Designees (the “Resigning PharmAthene Board Designee”) to resign upon the earlier of (i) such time as there has been a full settlement or a final, non-appealable resolution of that certain litigation matter between PharmAthene and SIGA Technologies, Inc. and (ii) the second anniversary of the Closing, but in no event prior to the first anniversary of the Closing (the “Resigning PharmAthene Board Designee Resignation Date”);

A-68


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(iii) to cause all vacancies on the PharmAthene board of directors created by the cessation of service of any Theraclone Board Designee to be filled by a nominee approved by the remaining Theraclone Board Designees;

(iv) to cause all vacancies on the PharmAthene board of directors created by the cessation of service of any PharmAthene Board Designee to be filled by a nominee approved by the remaining PharmAthene Board Designees;

(v) to cause fifty percent (50%) of the members of all committees of the PharmAthene Board of Directors to be filled by Theraclone Board Designees and where a committee of the PharmAthene Board of Directors is comprised of an odd number of directors, the last director shall be mutually agreed to by the PharmAthene Board Designees and Theraclone Board Designees that are members of such committee;

(vi) to obtain the resignations, or to cause the removal without cause, of the directors identified on Section 6.13 of the PharmAthene Disclosure Schedule as of the Closing Date; and

(vii) to obtain the resignation of the Resigning PharmAthene Board Designee on or before the Resigning PharmAthene Board Designee Resignation Date.

Subject to compliance with applicable Law, the rules and regulations of NYSE MKT LLC and to the extent not inconsistent with the fiduciary duties of the board of directors of PharmAthene, the Theraclone Board Designees and, if applicable, the Fourth Theraclone Director (or their successors as provided above) shall be nominated for election at each of the two successive annual meetings of PharmAthene’s stockholders at which directors are to be elected following the Closing Date and PharmAthene shall not take any action to expand the size of its board of directors or to change the proportionate representation on any committee thereof during such three year period.

Section 6.14 Treatment as Reorganization.  Unless required by applicable Law, none of PharmAthene, the Merger Sub or Theraclone shall, and, with respect to PharmAthene, shall not permit its Subsidiaries to, take any action (other than actions contemplated by this Agreement) or fail to take any action prior to, at or following the Closing that would reasonably be expected to cause the Merger to fail to qualify as a reorganization with the meaning of section 368(a) of the Code.

ARTICLE VII
 
CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER

Section 7.1 Conditions to Each Party’s Obligation to Effect the Merger.  The respective obligations of each party to effect the Merger shall be subject to the fulfillment (or waiver by all parties) at or prior to the Effective Time of the following conditions:

(a) The Theraclone Stockholder Approval and the PharmAthene Stockholder Approval shall have been obtained.

(b) No Law, judgment, injunction, order or decree by any court or other tribunal of competent jurisdiction which prohibits the consummation of the Merger shall have been adopted or entered and shall continue to be in effect.

(c) The shares of PharmAthene Common Stock to be issued in the Merger shall have been approved for listing on NYSE MKT LLC, subject to official notice of issuance.

(d) The Form S-4 Registration Statement shall have become effective in accordance with the provisions of the Securities Act, and shall not be subject to any stop order or proceeding (or threatened proceeding by the SEC) seeking a stop order with respect to the Form S-4 Registration Statement.

(e) The PharmAthene Bylaw Amendment shall have been approved at the PharmAthene Meeting.

A-69


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section 7.2 Conditions to Obligation of Theraclone to Effect the Merger.  The obligation of Theraclone to effect the Merger is further subject to the fulfillment of the following conditions:

(a) The representations and warranties of PharmAthene and Merger Sub set forth in this Agreement (other than those contained in Section 4.1(a), Section 4.2(a), Section 4.3(a), Section 4.3(b), Section 4.3(c), and Section 4.23 which are covered by the next succeeding sentence), disregarding all qualifications and exceptions contained therein related to “materiality” or “PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect,” shall be true and correct in all respects, in each case as of the date of this Agreement and as of the Closing Date, as though made on and as of the Closing Date (or, if given as of a specific date, at and as of such date), except where the failure of such representations or warranties to be true and correct has not had and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect. The representations and warranties set forth in Section 4.1(a), Section 4.2(a), Section 4.3(a), Section 4.3(b), Section 4.3(c), and Section 4.11 shall be true and correct in all respects (except, in the case of Section 4.3(a), Section 4.3(b) and Section 4.3(c), for such inaccuracies as are de minimis in the aggregate) as of the date hereof and as of the Closing Date, as though made on and as of the Closing Date (or, if given as of a specific date, as of such date).

(b) PharmAthene shall have delivered to Theraclone an Escrow Agreement between the Securityholders’ Representative, PharmAthene, and the Escrow Agent (the “Escrow Agreement”), duly executed by PharmAthene, in the form agreed upon among Theraclone and the parties thereto.

(c) PharmAthene shall have in all material respects performed all obligations and complied with all the agreements required by this Agreement to be performed or complied with by it prior to the Effective Time.

(d) PharmAthene shall have delivered to Theraclone a certificate, dated the Effective Time and signed by its Chief Executive Officer or another senior officer, certifying to the effect that the conditions set forth in Section 7.2(a), Section 7.3(c) and Section 7.3(f) have been satisfied.

(e) PharmAthene shall have delivered to Theraclone a fully executed copy of the Board Composition Agreement, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 6, pursuant to which the PharmAthene Approving Stockholders have, among other things, agreed to vote all of the stock of PharmAthene owned by such stockholders following the consummation of the Merger to designate Steve Gillis, Ph.D., Wende Hutton, Clifford J. Stocks, Mitch Sayare, Ph.D., Eric I. Richman, Derace L. Schaffer, M.D., John M. Gill, and Brian A. Markison as members of the PharmAthene Board of Directors (the “Board Composition Agreement”).

(f) Since the date hereof, no PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect shall have occurred.

Section 7.3 Conditions to Obligation of PharmAthene to Effect the Merger.  The obligation of PharmAthene to effect the Merger is further subject to the fulfillment of the following conditions:

(a) The representations and warranties of Theraclone set forth in this Agreement (other than those contained in Section 3.1(a), Section 3.2(a), Section 3.3(a), Section 3.16, and Section 3.17, which are covered by the next succeeding sentence), disregarding all qualifications and exceptions contained therein related to “materiality” or “Theraclone Material Adverse Effect,” shall be true and correct in all respects, in each case as of the date of this Agreement and as of the Closing Date, as though made on and as of the Closing Date (or, if given as of a specific date, at and as of such date), except where the failure of such representations or warranties to be true and correct has not had and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Theraclone Material Adverse Effect. The representations and warranties of Theraclone set forth in Section 3.1(a), Section 3.2(a), Section 3.3(a), Section 3.16, and Section 3.17 shall be true and correct in all respects (except, in the case of Section 3.2(a), for such inaccuracies as are de minimis in the aggregate) as of the date hereof and as of the Closing Date, as though made on and as of the Closing Date (or, if given as of a specific date, as of such date).

(b) Theraclone shall have delivered to PharmAthene the Escrow Agreement, duly executed by Theraclone and the Securityholders’ Representative.

A-70


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(c) Theraclone shall have in all material respects performed all obligations and complied with all the agreements required by this Agreement to be performed or complied with by it prior to the Effective Time.

(d) Theraclone shall have delivered to PharmAthene a certificate, dated the Effective Time and signed by its Chief Executive Officer or another senior officer, certifying to the effect that the conditions set forth in Section 7.3(a), Section 7.3(c) and Section 7.3(f) have been satisfied.

(e) Theraclone shall have delivered to PharmAthene a fully executed copy of the Board Composition Agreement, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 6, pursuant to which the Approving Theraclone Stockholders have, among other things, agreed to vote all of the stock of PharmAthene owned by such stockholders following the consummation of the Merger to designate Steve Gillis, Ph.D., Wende Hutton, Clifford J. Stocks, Mitch Sayare, Ph.D., Eric I. Richman, Derace L. Schaffer, M.D., John M. Gill, and Brian A. Markison as members of the PharmAthene Board of Directors.

(f) Since the date hereof, no Theraclone Material Adverse Effect shall have occurred.

(g) No more than five percent (5%) of the total issued and outstanding shares of PharmAthene Common Stock have delivered written demands for appraisal in accordance with the DGCL.

(h) All Theraclone Approvals shall have been obtained.

(i) The Post-Closing Lock-Up Agreement shall continue to be in full force and effect at the Effective Time.

(j) All $8,000,000 of capital committed to Theraclone pursuant to that certain Series B-1 Purchase Agreement has been delivered to and deposited by Theraclone.

(k) Theraclone shall have delivered to PharmAthene a FIRPTA Notification Letter addressed to PharmAthene, dated as of the Closing Date, duly executed by Theraclone, satisfying each of the requirements of Treasury Regulations section 1.897-2(h) and (i) stating that Theraclone has never been a “United States real property holding corporation,” as defined in section 897(c)(2) of the Code, and (ii) that no interest in Theraclone is a “United States real property interest,” as defined in Section 897(c)(1) of the Code.

(l) Theraclone shall have delivered to PharmAthene a notice to the IRS, satisfying each of the requirements of Treasury Regulation section 1.897-2(h)(2), dated as of the Closing Date, executed by Theraclone, together with written authorization for the Surviving Subsidiary to deliver such notice form to the IRS after the Effective Time.

ARTICLE VIII
 
TERMINATION

Section 8.1 Termination and Abandonment.  Notwithstanding anything contained in this Agreement to the contrary, this Agreement may be terminated and abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time, and except as provided below, whether before or after receipt of the Theraclone Stockholder Approval or the PharmAthene Stockholder Approval:

(a) by the mutual written consent of Theraclone and PharmAthene;

(b) by either PharmAthene or Theraclone if the Merger shall not have been consummated by January 31, 2014 (the “Outside Closing Date Termination Right”); provided, however, that the right to terminate this Agreement under this Section 8.1(b) shall not be available to any party hereto whose action or failure to act has been a principal cause of the failure of the Merger to occur on or before such date and such action or failure to act constitutes a breach of this Agreement, provided, further, that, in the event that the SEC has not declared the Form S-4 Registration Statement effective under the Securities Act by October 4, 2013, then either PharmAthene or Theraclone shall be entitled to extend the date for termination of this Agreement pursuant to this Section 8.1(b) for an additional sixty (60) days; provided, further, that in no event shall PharmAthene be entitled to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this

A-71


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section 8.1(b) prior to such time at which a PharmAthene Meeting was held during which a quorum necessary to conduct the business of the PharmAthene Meeting was present at all times;

(c) by either Theraclone or PharmAthene if an injunction, order, decree or ruling of a Governmental Entity of competent jurisdiction shall have been entered permanently restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the consummation of the Merger and such injunction shall have become final and non-appealable (the “Transaction Prohibition Termination Right”); provided, however, that the right to terminate this Agreement under this Section 8.1(c) shall not be available to any party whose material breach of a representation, warranty, covenant or agreement in this Agreement has been a principal cause of the entry of such final and non-appealable injunction, order, decree or ruling;

(d) by either PharmAthene or Theraclone if the PharmAthene Meeting (including any postponements or adjournments thereof) shall have concluded and the PharmAthene Stockholder Approval shall not have been obtained (the “PharmAthene Stockholder Failure to Consent Termination Right”); provided, however, that the right to terminate this Agreement under this Section 8.1(d)) shall not be available to PharmAthene where the failure to obtain approval of the PharmAthene Stockholder Approval Matters at the PharmAthene Meeting is caused by any action or failure to act on the part of PharmAthene that constitutes a breach of this Agreement;

(e) by Theraclone, if PharmAthene shall have breached or failed to perform any of its representations, warranties, covenants or agreements set forth in this Agreement or any of such representations and warranties shall have become untrue as of any date subsequent to the date of this Agreement, which breach, failure to perform or untruth (i) would give rise to the failure of a condition set forth in Section 7.2(a) or Section 7.2(c) (assuming, in the case of any untruth, that such subsequent date was the Closing Date) and (ii) is not capable of being cured prior to the Closing or, if capable of being cured, shall not have been cured by PharmAthene by the 30th calendar day following receipt of written notice of such breach or failure to perform from Theraclone (the “PharmAthene Breach Termination Right”); provided, however, that Theraclone shall not be entitled to terminate this Agreement under this Section 8.1(e) if Theraclone is then in breach of its representations, warranties, covenants or agreements contained in this Agreement, which breach would give rise to the failure of a condition to Closing set forth in Section 7.3(a) or Section 7.3(c) (assuming, in the case of any untruth, that such subsequent date was the date of termination);

(f) by Theraclone, if (i) the PharmAthene Board of Directors (or any committee thereof) shall have effected a PharmAthene Recommendation Withdrawal or a Transaction Event Withdrawal, (ii) PharmAthene shall have failed to include the PharmAthene Recommendation in the Proxy Statement, (iii) the PharmAthene Board of Directors (or any committee thereof) shall have recommended or approved any PharmAthene Takeover Proposal, (iv) the PharmAthene Board of Directors shall have failed to publicly reaffirm the PharmAthene Recommendation within four (4) Business Days following receipt of a written request by Theraclone to provide such reaffirmation following a PharmAthene Takeover Proposal or (v) PharmAthene shall have otherwise breached Section 6.3 in any material respect (the “PharmAthene Recommendation Withdrawal Termination Right”);

(g) by PharmAthene, if Theraclone shall have breached or failed to perform any of its representations, warranties, covenants or agreements set forth in this Agreement or any of such representations and warranties shall have become untrue as of any date subsequent to the date of this Agreement, which breach, failure to perform or untruth (i) would give rise to the failure of a condition set forth in Section 7.3(a) or Section 7.3(b) (assuming, in the case of any untruth, that such subsequent date was the Closing Date) and (ii) is not capable of being cured prior to the Closing or, if capable of being cured, shall not have been cured by Theraclone by the 30th calendar day following receipt of written notice of such breach or failure to perform from PharmAthene (the “Theraclone Breach Termination Right”); provided, however, that PharmAthene shall not be entitled to terminate this Agreement under this Section 8.1(g) if PharmAthene is then in breach of its representations, warranties, covenants or agreements contained in this Agreement, which breach would give rise to the failure of a condition to Closing set forth in Section 7.2(a) or Section 7.2(c) (assuming, in the case of any untruth, that such subsequent date was the date of termination); or

A-72


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(h) by PharmAthene (i) prior to the receipt of the PharmAthene Stockholder Approval, if the PharmAthene Board of Directors shall have approved, and PharmAthene shall promptly following such termination enter into, a definitive agreement providing for a PharmAthene Superior Proposal (the “PharmAthene Superior Proposal Termination Right”) or (ii) pursuant to a Transaction Event Withdrawal; provided, however, that (i) PharmAthene shall have complied with the provisions of, the procedures set forth in and its obligations under Section 6.3(c) and Section 6.3(d); and (ii) PharmAthene shall have immediately prior to such termination made the payment required by Section 8.2.

Section 8.2 Effect of Termination.

(a) If this Agreement is terminated by:

(i) PharmAthene pursuant to its PharmAthene Superior Proposal Termination Right, PharmAthene shall pay, or cause to be paid to Theraclone, immediately prior to such termination, cash in an amount equal to $3,500,000 (the “Tier 1 Breakup Fee”);

(ii) Theraclone pursuant to the PharmAthene Recommendation Withdrawal Termination Right if the PharmAthene Board of Directors has effected the Transaction Event Withdrawal, PharmAthene shall pay, or cause to be paid to Theraclone, promptly, and in any event no later than three (3) Business Days following the date of such termination, cash in an amount equal to $4,500,000 (the “Tier 2 Breakup Fee”);

(iii) PharmAthene pursuant to a Transaction Event Withdrawal, PharmAthene shall pay, or cause to be paid to Theraclone, promptly, and in any event no later than three (3) Business Days following the date of such termination, the Tier 2 Breakup Fee;

(iv) either PharmAthene or Theraclone pursuant to either the Outside Closing Date Termination Right or the PharmAthene Stockholder Failure to Consent Termination Right and at any time prior to the PharmAthene Meeting a PharmAthene Takeover Proposal has been publicly announced, disclosed, made, proposed or communicated and within nine (9) months after the date of the termination of this Agreement, PharmAthene enters into an agreement or understanding (including a letter of intent) with respect to any PharmAthene Takeover Proposal which is subsequently consummated, PharmAthene shall pay, or cause to be paid to Theraclone, no later than three (3) Business Days after consummation of such PharmAthene Takeover Proposal, cash in an amount equal to the Tier 1 Breakup Fee;

(v) either PharmAthene or Theraclone for any reason set forth in Section 8.1 above (including if Theraclone has terminated pursuant to the PharmAthene Recommendation Withdrawal Termination Right because the PharmAthene Board of Directors has effected a Transaction Event Withdrawal) other than the Theraclone Breach Termination Right or Transaction Prohibition Termination Right, PharmAthene shall pay, or cause to be paid to Theraclone, promptly, and in any event no later than three (3) Business Days following the production of verifiable evidence therefor, cash in an amount equal to the Termination Fee; and

(vi) PharmAthene pursuant to its Theraclone Breach Termination Right, by either party pursuant to the Transaction Prohibition Termination Right, or upon the mutual consent of the parties, PharmAthene shall not be required to pay the Tier 1 Breakup Fee, the Tier 2 Breakup Fee or Termination Fee to Theraclone.

(b) For the avoidance of doubt, in no event shall PharmAthene be required to pay the Termination Fee, the Tier 1 Breakup Fee or the Tier 2 Breakup Fee on more than one occasion. Any such payment of a Termination Fee, Tier 1 Breakup Fee and/or Tier 2 Breakup Fee shall be made by wire transfer of immediately available funds to an account designated in writing by Theraclone or, if no such account is designated, by bank check.

(c) If PharmAthene fails to pay when due any amount payable by PharmAthene under Section 8.2(a), then (i) PharmAthene shall reimburse Theraclone for reasonable costs and expenses (including reasonable fees and disbursements of counsel) incurred in connection with the collection of such overdue amount and the enforcement by Theraclone of its rights under this Section 8.2, and (ii) PharmAthene shall pay to

A-73


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Theraclone interest on such overdue amount (for the period commencing as of the date such overdue amount was originally required to be paid and ending on the date such overdue amount is actually paid to Theraclone in full) at a rate per annum equal to the “U.S. Prime Rate” (as published in the Wall Street Journal) in effect on the date such overdue amount was originally required to be paid.

(d) On any termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1, this Agreement shall terminate (except for the provisions of this Section 8.2 and Section 9.3 through Section 9.13), and, subject to the payment of any amounts owing pursuant to this Section 8.2, and there shall be no other liability on the part of Theraclone or PharmAthene to the other except as provided in the Confidentiality Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent that any termination of this Agreement results from the willful and material breach by a party of any representation or warranty or covenant set forth in this Agreement, then such party shall be liable for any damages incurred or suffered by the other party as a result of such breach.

ARTICLE IX
 
MISCELLANEOUS

Section 9.1 Expenses.  Except as otherwise explicitly set forth in Section 8.2 or elsewhere in this Agreement, whether or not the Merger is consummated, all costs and expenses incurred in connection with the Merger, this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby shall be paid by the party incurring or required to incur such expenses.

Section 9.2 Counterparts; Effectiveness.  This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which will constitute an original, with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument, and will become effective when one or more counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and delivered (by facsimile, e-mail or otherwise) to the other parties.

Section 9.3 Governing Law.  This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to any choice or conflict of law provision or rule (whether of the State of Delaware or any other jurisdiction) that would cause the application of the laws of any jurisdiction other than the State of Delaware.

Section 9.4 Specific Performance; Jurisdiction; Enforcement.  The parties agree that irreparable damage would occur if any of the provisions of this Agreement were not performed in accordance with their specific terms or were otherwise breached. It is accordingly agreed that the parties shall be entitled to an injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions of this Agreement exclusively in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware, or if (but only if) that court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over such action or proceeding, in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. In addition, each of the parties hereto irrevocably agrees that any legal action or proceeding with respect to this Agreement and the rights and obligations arising hereunder, or for recognition and enforcement of any judgment in respect of this Agreement and the rights and obligations arising hereunder brought by the other party hereto or its successors or assigns, shall be brought and determined exclusively in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware, or if (but only if) that court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over such action or proceeding, in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Each of the parties hereto hereby irrevocably submits with regard to any such action or proceeding for itself and in respect of its property, generally and unconditionally, to the personal jurisdiction of the aforesaid courts and agrees that it will not bring any action relating to this Agreement or any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement in any court other than the aforesaid courts. Each of the parties hereto hereby irrevocably waives, and agrees not to assert, by way of motion, as a defense, counterclaim or otherwise, in any action or proceeding with respect to this Agreement, (a) any claim that it is not personally subject to the jurisdiction of the above-named courts for any reason other than the failure to serve in accordance with this Section 9.4, (b) any claim that it or its property is exempt or immune from jurisdiction of any such court or from any legal process commenced in such courts (whether through service of notice, attachment prior to judgment, attachment in aid of execution of judgment, execution of judgment or otherwise) and (c) to the fullest extent permitted by the applicable law, any claim that (i) the suit, action or proceeding in such court is brought in an

A-74


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

inconvenient forum, (ii) the venue of such suit, action or proceeding is improper or (iii) this Agreement, or the subject matter of this Agreement, may not be enforced in or by such courts.

Section 9.5 WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL.  EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO IRREVOCABLY WAIVES ANY AND ALL RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY LEGAL PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT.

Section 9.6 Notices.  Any notice required to be given hereunder shall be sufficient if in writing, and sent by facsimile transmission (provided that any notice received by facsimile transmission or otherwise at the addressee’s location on any Business Day after 5:00 p.m. (addressee’s local time) shall be deemed to have been received at 9:00 a.m. (addressee’s local time) on the next Business Day), by reliable overnight delivery service (with proof of service), hand delivery or certified or registered mail (return receipt requested and first-class postage prepaid), addressed as follows:

(a) To PharmAthene or Merger Sub:

PharmAthene, Inc.
One Park Place
Suite #450
Annapolis, MD 21401
Telecopy: 410-269-2601
Attention: General Counsel

with a copy to:

Dentons US LLP
1221 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10020-1089
Telecopy: (212) 768-7800
Attention: Jeffrey A. Baumel, Esq.
         Stephan J. Mallenbaum, Esq.

(b) To Theraclone:
 

Theraclone Sciences, Inc.
Seattle Life Sciences Building
1124 Columbia Street, Suite 300
Seattle, WA 98104
Telecopy: 206-805-1699
Attention: Chief Executive Officer

with a copy to:

Fenwick & West LLP
1191 Second Avenue, 10th Floor
Seattle, WA 98101
Telecopy: (206) 389-4511
Attention: Stephen M. Graham

or to such other address as any party shall specify by written notice so given, and such notice shall be deemed to have been delivered as of the date so telecommunicated, personally delivered or mailed. Any party to this Agreement may notify any other party of any changes to the address or any of the other details specified in this paragraph; provided, however, that such notification shall only be effective on the date specified in such notice or five (5) business days after the notice is given, whichever is later. Rejection or other refusal to accept or the inability to deliver because of changed address of which no notice was given will be deemed to be receipt of the notice as of the date of such rejection, refusal or inability to deliver.

A-75


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section 9.7 Assignment; Binding Effect.  Neither this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or obligations hereunder may be assigned by any of the parties hereto (whether by operation of law or otherwise) without the prior written consent of the other parties. Subject to the preceding sentence, this Agreement is binding upon and inures to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.

Section 9.8 Severability.  Any term or provision of this Agreement which is invalid or unenforceable in any jurisdiction will, as to that jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such invalidity or unenforceability without rendering invalid or unenforceable the remaining terms and provisions of this Agreement and without rendering invalid or unenforceable any terms in any other jurisdiction. If any provision of this Agreement is so broad as to be unenforceable, it is the parties’ intent that such provision will be interpreted to be only so broad as is enforceable.

Section 9.9 Entire Agreement; No Third-Party Beneficiaries.  This Agreement (including the exhibits and schedules hereto) and the Confidentiality Agreement constitute the entire agreement, and supersede all other prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral, between the parties hereto, or any of them, with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement and thereof. This Agreement, except for Section 6.9, which is intended to be for the benefit of the persons covered thereby and may be enforced by such persons, is not intended to and shall not confer upon any person other than the parties hereto any rights or remedies hereunder. No representation, warranty, inducement, promise, understanding or condition not set forth in this Agreement has been made or relied upon by any of the parties hereto.

Section 9.10 Amendments; Waivers.  At any time prior to the Effective Time, any provision of this Agreement may be amended or waived if, and only if, such amendment or waiver is in writing and signed, in the case of an amendment, by Theraclone, PharmAthene and Merger Sub, or in the case of a waiver, by the party against whom the waiver is to be effective; provided, however, that after receipt of the Theraclone Stockholder Approval, if any such amendment or waiver shall by applicable Law or in accordance with the rules and regulations of NYSE MKT LLC require further approval of the stockholders of Theraclone, the effectiveness of such amendment or waiver will be subject to the approval of the stockholders of Theraclone; provided, further, however, that after the receipt of the PharmAthene Stockholder Approval, if any such amendment or waiver shall by applicable law or in accordance with the rules and regulations of NYSE MKT LLC require further approval by the stockholders of PharmAthene, the effectiveness of such amendment or waiver will be subject to the approval of the stockholders of PharmAthene. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no failure or delay by Theraclone or PharmAthene in exercising any right hereunder will operate as a waiver thereof nor will any single or partial exercise thereof preclude any other or further exercise of any other right hereunder.

Section 9.11 Headings.  Headings of the Articles and sections of this Agreement are for convenience of the parties only and will be given no substantive or interpretive effect whatsoever. The table of contents to this Agreement is for reference purposes only and will not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.

Section 9.12 Interpretation.  When a reference is made in this Agreement to an Article or section, such reference shall be to an Article or section of this Agreement unless otherwise indicated. Whenever the words “include,” “includes” or “including” are used in this Agreement, they will be deemed to be followed by the words “without limitation.” The words “hereof,” “herein” and “hereunder” and words of similar import when used in this Agreement shall refer to this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular provision of this Agreement. All terms defined in this Agreement will have those defined meanings when used in any certificate or other document made or delivered pursuant hereto unless otherwise defined therein. The definitions contained in this Agreement are applicable to the singular as well as the plural forms of such terms and to the masculine as well as to the feminine and neuter genders of such term. Any agreement, instrument or statute defined or referred to herein or in any agreement or instrument that is referred to herein means such agreement, instrument or statute as from time to time amended, modified or supplemented, including (in the case of agreements or instruments) by waiver or consent and (in the case of statutes) by succession of comparable successor statutes and references to all attachments thereto and instruments incorporated therein. Each of the parties has participated in the drafting and negotiation of this Agreement. If an ambiguity or question of intent or interpretation arises, this Agreement must be construed as if it is drafted by all the parties, and no

A-76


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

presumption or burden of proof will arise favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of authorship of any of the provisions of this Agreement. References in this Agreement to specific laws or to specific provisions of laws include all rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. Any statute defined or referred to herein or in any agreement or instrument referred to herein means such statute as from time to time amended, modified or supplemented, including by succession of comparable successor statutes.

Section 9.13 Definitions.  As used in this Agreement (except as specifically otherwise defined):

(a) “Acceptable PharmAthene Confidentiality Agreement” means a confidentiality agreement that contains confidentiality provisions that are no less favorable in any material respect to PharmAthene than those contained in the Confidentiality Agreement and includes a “standstill” provision;

(b) “affiliates” mean, as to any person, any other person which, directly or indirectly, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, such person. As used in this definition, “control” (including, with its correlative meanings, “controlled by” and “under common control with”) means the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of management or policies of a person, whether through the ownership of securities or partnership or other ownership interests, by contract or otherwise;

(c) “Business Day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a day on which the banks in Delaware and New York are authorized by law or executive order to be closed;

(d) “Confidentiality Agreement” means that certain Confidentiality Agreement, dated as April 5th, 2013 by and between PharmAthene and Theraclone;

(e) “Environmental Law” means any Law relating to (i) the protection, preservation or restoration of the environment (including air, water vapor, surface water, groundwater, drinking water supply, surface land, subsurface land, plant and animal life or any other natural resource) or (ii) the exposure to, or the use, storage, recycling, treatment, generation, transportation, processing, handling, labeling, production, release or disposal of Hazardous Substances;

(f) “Escrow Shares” means such number of shares of PharmAthene Common Stock that comprise five percent (5%) of the Merger Consideration.

(g) “Form S-4 Registration Statement” shall mean the registration statement on Form S-4 to be filed with the SEC by PharmAthene in connection with issuance of PharmAthene Common Stock in the Merger, as said registration statement may be amended prior to the time it is declared effective by the SEC;

(h) “Fully Diluted Equity” means (i) with respect to PharmAthene, the total number of shares of PharmAthene Common Stock then issued and outstanding, (x) including the full conversion or exercise of all then outstanding options to purchase PharmAthene Common Stock and warrants to purchase PharmAthene Common Stock, in each case, with an exercise price less than or equal to $2.50 per share of PharmAthene Common Stock, (y) excluding all then outstanding options and warrants, in each case, with an exercise price greater than $2.50 per share of PharmAthene Common Stock and (y) including all convertible securities and (ii) with respect to Theraclone, the total number of Theraclone Common Shares then issued and outstanding, including full conversion or exercise of all then outstanding options and warrants and all convertible securities.

By way of example only, if, as of immediately prior to the Effective Time, there are 51,174,000 shares of PharmAthene Common Stock outstanding and an aggregate of 8,047,000 options to purchase PharmAthene Common Stock and warrants PharmAthene Common Stock with exercise prices equal to or less than $2.50 per share of PharmAthene Common Stock outstanding, then the “Fully Diluted Equity” with respect to PharmAthene is equal to 59,221,000, which is the sum of 51,174,000 and 8,047,000. If Theraclone’s “Fully Diluted Equity” is equal to 51,687,000, then the “Exchange Ratio” is equal to approximately 1.1458, which is the quotient obtained by dividing 59,221,000 by 51,687,000.

(i) “GAAP” means accounting principles generally accepted in the United States;

A-77


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(j) “Hazardous Substance” means any substance presently listed, defined, designated or classified as hazardous, toxic, radioactive, or dangerous, or otherwise regulated, under any Environmental Law. Hazardous Substance includes any substance to which exposure is regulated by any Governmental Entity or any Environmental Law including any toxic waste, pollutant, contaminant, hazardous substance (including toxic mold), toxic substance, hazardous waste, special waste, industrial substance or petroleum or any derivative or byproduct thereof, radon, radioactive material, asbestos, or asbestos containing material, urea formaldehyde, foam insulation or polychlorinated biphenyls;

(k) “Indebtedness” means (A) all indebtedness for borrowed money (including the issuance of any debt security), (B) any other indebtedness that is evidenced by a note, bond, mortgage debenture or similar instrument, (C) all obligations under capital leases, (D) all obligations in respect of outstanding letters of credit and (E) all guarantee obligations with respect to the foregoing;

(l) “Intellectual Property” means (i) patents, trademarks, service marks, trade names, domain names, copyrights, designs and trade secrets, (ii) applications for and registrations of such patents, trademarks, service marks, trade names, domain names, copyrights and designs, (iii) processes, formulae, methods, schematics, technology, know-how, computer software programs and applications, and (iv) other tangible or intangible proprietary or confidential information and materials;

(m) “knowledge” means (i) with respect to an individual, that such individual is actually aware of the relevant fact and (ii) with respect to any person, that any officer of such person is actually aware of the relevant fact;

(n) “Permitted Liens” means, as to any person, any Lien (A) for Taxes or governmental assessments, charges or claims of payment not yet due or being contested in good faith and for which adequate accruals or reserves have been established, (B) that is a carriers’, warehousemen’s, mechanics’, materialmen’s, repairmen’s, landlord’s or other similar lien arising in the ordinary course of business, (C) that is disclosed on the most recent consolidated balance sheet of such person or notes thereto or securing liabilities reflected on such balance sheet, (D) that was incurred in the ordinary course of business since the date of the most recent consolidated balance sheet of such person, (E) with respect to Leased Real Property, related to the rights of tenants and subtenants under Real Property Leases and Real Property Subleases, including, without limitation, any right of first offer, right of first refusal or options to purchase, (F) with respect to Leased Real Property, that is disclosed by any title commitment, any title policy, survey or other document made available to either PharmAthene or Theraclone, as applicable, (G) that is a title exception, defect, encumbrance or other matter, whether or not of record, which does not materially affect the continued use of the property for the purposes for which the property is currently being used by such person or a Subsidiary of such person as of the date of this Agreement or (H) with respect to any Real Property Lease that affects the interest of the landlord thereunder, which does not materially impair the value or use of such Real Property Lease;

(o) “person” means an individual, a corporation, a partnership, a limited liability company, an association, a trust or any other entity, group (as such term is used in section 13 of the Exchange Act) or organization, including a Governmental Entity, and any permitted successors and assigns of such person;

(p) “PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect” means any change, effect, event, occurrence or state of facts that, individually or in the aggregate, is, or would reasonably be expected to be, (x) materially adverse to the assets, properties, business or financial condition or results of operations of PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, but shall not include an effect arising from facts, circumstances, events or changes, (a) generally affecting the pharmaceuticals industry in the United States or the economy or the financial or securities markets in the United States or elsewhere in the world, including governmental, regulatory, social or political conditions or developments (including any outbreak or escalation of hostilities or acts of war, whether or not pursuant to the declaration of a national emergency or war, or acts of terrorism), earthquakes, hurricanes, tsunamis, tornadoes, floods, mudslides, wild fires or other natural disasters, weather conditions and other force majeure events in the United States or any other country or region in the world or changes in interest rates, but, in each case, only to the extent such matters do not have a disproportionate impact on PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries as compared to other participants in their industries or (b) to the extent resulting from (i) the announcement of, or compliance

A-78


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

with, this Agreement or the announcement of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement other than for purposes of Section 4.2 (and the condition contained in Section 7.2(a) with respect thereto), (ii) changes in applicable Law or GAAP or interpretation thereof by a third party, (iii) changes, solely in and of themselves, in the market price or trading volume of the PharmAthene Common Stock (it being understood that the cause of any such changes may be deemed to constitute, in and of itself, a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect and may be taken into consideration in determining whether a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect has occurred), (iv) the failure, in and of itself, of PharmAthene to meet any expected or projected financial or operating performance target, but not any underlying cause of such failure (it being understood that the cause of any such failure may be deemed to constitute, in and of itself, a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect and may be taken into consideration in determining whether a PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect has occurred), or (v) any legal proceedings made or brought by any of the stockholders of PharmAthene (on their own behalf or on behalf of PharmAthene) against PharmAthene arising out of the Merger or in connection with any other transactions contemplated by this Agreement; or (y) prevent or materially delay the performance by PharmAthene of any of its obligations under this Agreement or the consummation of the Merger or the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement;

(q) “PharmAthene Stock Option” means options to purchase PharmAthene Common Stock;

(r) “PharmAthene Superior Proposal” means an unsolicited, bona fide written PharmAthene Takeover Proposal, which proposal was not the result of a breach of Section 6.3, made by a third party that is not an affiliate of PharmAthene on terms that the PharmAthene Board of Directors reasonably determines, after consultation with PharmAthene’s outside financial advisor and its outside legal counsel, (x) is more favorable from a financial point of view to PharmAthene’s stockholders than the Merger and the transactions contemplated hereby, (y) is reasonably likely to be completed and (z) that failing to accept such proposal would be a breach of its fiduciary duties under applicable Law; in each case taking into account, in addition to any other factors determined by the PharmAthene Board of Directors to be relevant, and (i) considering all timing, financial, legal, regulatory and other aspects of such proposal, (ii) the identity of the person making such proposal (including reputation thereof), (iii) the other terms and conditions of such offer or proposal and the implications thereof on the PharmAthene, including relevant legal, regulatory and other aspects of such offer or proposal deemed relevant by the PharmAthene Board of Directors, and (iv) any proposal made by Theraclone in connection therewith or response thereto; provided, however, that any such offer shall not be deemed to be a “PharmAthene Superior Proposal” if any financing required to consummate the transaction contemplated by such offer is not committed and is not reasonably likely of being obtained by such third party as determined by the PharmAthene Board of Directors in its reasonable judgment, or if the consummation of such transaction is contingent on any such financing being obtained;

(s) “PharmAthene Takeover Proposal” means any proposal or offer from any person relating to any (A) direct or indirect acquisition or purchase (including any sale, lease, exchange, transfer or license) of a business or assets that constitutes 50% or more of the net revenues, net income or the assets of PharmAthene and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, (B) direct or indirect acquisition or purchase of 50% or more of the equity capital stock of PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries, (C) tender offer or exchange offer that if consummated would result in any person beneficially owning 50% of the equity capital stock of PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries or (D) merger, consolidation, business combination, recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution or similar transaction involving PharmAthene or any of its Subsidiaries, in each case that does not include Theraclone following the Merger contemplated by this Agreement;

(t) “Pro Rata Share” means a percentage equal to (i) the Merger Consideration payable to such Theraclone Stockholder divided by (ii) the aggregate Merger Consideration.

(u) “Proxy Statement” means the letter to stockholders of PharmAthene, notice of meeting with respect to the PharmAthene Meeting, proxy statement/prospectus, forms of proxy and any other proxy solicitation materials to be filed with the SEC and distributed to stockholders of PharmAthene in connection with the Merger;

A-79


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(v) “Sarbanes-Oxley Act” means the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002;

(w) “SEC” means the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission;

(x) “Subsidiaries” of any party mean any corporation, partnership, association, trust or other form of legal entity of which (i) more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities are on the date of this Agreement directly or indirectly owned by such party, or (ii) such party or any Subsidiary of such party is a general partner (excluding partnerships in which such party or any Subsidiary of such party does not have a majority of the voting interests in such partnership);

(y) “Theraclone Material Adverse Effect” means any change, effect, event, occurrence or state of facts that, individually or in the aggregate, is, or would reasonably be expected to be, (x) materially adverse to the assets, properties, business or financial condition or results of operations of Theraclone, but shall not include an effect arising from facts, circumstances, events or changes, (a) generally affecting the pharmaceuticals industry in the United States or the economy or the financial or securities markets in the United States or elsewhere in the world, including governmental, regulatory, social or political conditions or developments (including any outbreak or escalation of hostilities or acts of war, whether or not pursuant to the declaration of a national emergency or war, or acts of terrorism), earthquakes, hurricanes, tsunamis, tornadoes, floods, mudslides, wild fires or other natural disasters, weather conditions and other force majeure events in the United States or any other country or region in the world or changes in interest rates, but, in each case, only to the extent such matters do not have a disproportionate impact on Theraclone as compared to other participants in their industries or (b) to the extent resulting from (i) the announcement of, or compliance with, this Agreement or the announcement of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, other than for purposes of Section 3.3 (and the condition contained in Section 7.3(a) with respect thereto), (ii) changes in applicable Law or GAAP or interpretation thereof by a third party, (iii) the failure, in and of itself, of Theraclone to meet any expected or projected financial or operating performance target, but not any underlying cause of such failure (it being understood that the cause of any such failure may be deemed to constitute, in and of itself, a Theraclone Material Adverse Effect and may be taken into consideration in determining whether a Theraclone Material Adverse Effect has occurred), (iv) any legal proceedings made or brought by any of the stockholders of Theraclone (on their own behalf or on behalf of Theraclone) against Theraclone or PharmAthene arising out of the Merger or in connection with any other transactions contemplated by this Agreement; or (y) prevent or materially delay the performance by Theraclone of any of its obligations under this Agreement or the consummation of the Merger or the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement;

(z) “Theraclone Preferred Stock” means the Theraclone’s Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock and Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock;

(aa) “Theraclone Stock Incentive Plan” means Theraclone 2004 Stock Option Plan;

(bb) “Theraclone Stock Option” means options to purchase Theraclone Common Shares;

(cc) “Theraclone Stockholder” or “Theraclone Stockholders” means, individually, all of the stockholders of Theraclone as of the Closing Date and, collectively, all of the stockholders of Theraclone as of the Closing Date;

(dd) “Theraclone Warrants” means warrants to purchase shares of capital stock of Theraclone;

(ee) “Tax Law” means any Law related to Taxes;

(ff) “Taxes” means (x) any and all domestic or non-U.S., federal, state, provincial, municipal, local or other charges in the nature of taxes (together with any and all interest, penalties, additions to tax and additional amounts imposed with respect thereto) imposed by any Governmental Entity, including taxes on or with respect to income, franchises, windfall or other profits, gross receipts, escheat, property, sales, use, capital stock, payroll, employment, unemployment, social security, workers’ compensation or net worth, and taxes in the nature of excise, withholding, ad valorem or value added, (y) all liability for the payment of any amounts of the type described in clause (x) as a result of successor liability or as a result of being a member of an affiliated, consolidated, combined, unitary or aggregate group, and (z) all liability for the payment of any amounts as a result of being a party to any tax sharing agreement or as a result of any

A-80


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

express or implied obligation to indemnify any other person with respect to the payment of any amounts of the type described in clause (x) or (y) and (ii) “Tax Return” means any return, report, claim for refund, or similar filing (including the attached schedules) required to be filed with respect to Taxes, including any information return, statement, or declaration of estimated Taxes, and including any amendment thereof; and

(gg) “Termination Fee” means the actual and verifiable out-of-pocket costs and expenses of Theraclone in connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby, not to exceed $1,000,000 in the aggregate.

Each of the following terms is defined on the page set forth opposite such term:

 
Term   Section
Acceptable PharmAthene Confidentiality Agreement   Section 9.13(a)
Approving Theraclone Stockholders   Recitals
Approving PharmAthene Stockholders   Recitals
affiliates   Section 9.13(b)
Agreement   Preamble
Authorizations   Section 3.22(b)
Board Change Date   Section 6.4(b)
Board Composition Agreement   Section 7.2(e)
Business Day   Section 9.13(c)
Cancelled Shares   Section 2.1(b)
Certificate of Merger   Section 1.3
Certificates   Section 2.2(a)
Certifications   Section 4.4(a)
Claiming Party   Section 5.6(a)
Closing   Section 1.2
Closing Date   Section 1.2
Code   Section 1.8
Commonly Controlled Entity   Section 3.8(a)
Confidentiality Agreement   Section 9.13(d)
Contract   Section 3.3(c)
Converted Warrant   Section 2.1(h)(iv)
DGCL   Recitals
Deductible   Section 5.4(a)
Dissenting Shares   Section 2.1(f)(i)
Drug Laws   Section 3.22(a)
Effective Time   Section 1.3
Environmental Law   Section 9.13(e)
ERISA   Section 3.8(a)
Escrow Agent   Section 5.5(a)
Escrow Agreement   Section 7.2(b)
Escrow Dividends   Section 5.5(c)
Escrow Fund   Section 5.5(a)
Escrow Shares   Section 9.13(f)
Exchange Act   Section 3.3(b)
Exchange Agent   Section 2.2(a)
Exchange Fund   Section 2.2(a)
Exchange Ratio   Section 2.1(a)
FDA   Section 3.22(a)
FDCA   Section 3.22(a)
Fourth Theraclone Director   Section 6.13(b)
Form S-4 Registration Statement   Section 9.13(g)

A-81


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
Term   Section
Fully Diluted Equity   Section 9.13(h)
GAAP   Section 9.13(i)
GLP   Section 3.22(c)
Government Contract   Section 3.23(a)
Governmental Entity   Section 3.3(b)
Hazardous Substance   Section 9.13(j)
Indebtedness   Section 9.13(k)
Indemnification Cap   Section 5.4(b)
Indemnification Notice   Section 5.6(a)
Indemnification Notice Period   Section 5.6(a)
Indemnified Party   Section 6.9(a)
Indemnity Period   Section 5.3(a)
Intellectual Property   Section 9.13(l)
IRS   Section 3.8(b)
knowledge   Section 9.13(m)
Law   Section 3.6(a)
Laws   Section 3.6(a)
Leased Real Property   Section 3.15(b)
Lien   Section 3.12(f)
Losses   Section 5.1
Merger   Recitals
Merger Consideration   Section 2.1(a)
Merger Sub   Preamble
New Plans   Section 6.5(a)
Outside Closing Date Termination Right   Section 8.1(b)
Participating Employees   Section 6.5(a)
Permitted Liens   Section 9.13(n)
person   Section 9.13(o)
PHSA   Section 3.22(a)
PharmAthene   Preamble
PharmAthene Affiliate Transactions   Section 4.20
PharmAthene Benefit Plans   Section 4.9(a)
PharmAthene Board Charters and Policies   Section 4.1(c)
PharmAthene Board Designee   Section 6.13(a)
PharmAthene Board of Directors   Recitals
PharmAthene Breach Termination Right   Section 8.1(e)
PharmAthene Bylaw Amendment   Section 6.4(b)
PharmAthene Charter Amendment   Section 4.24
PharmAthene Common Stock   Section 4.3(a)
PharmAthene Commonly Controlled Entity   Section 4.9(a)
PharmAthene Disclosure Schedule   ARTICLE IV
PharmAthene Governmental Contract   Section 4.22(a)
PharmAthene Indemnified Persons   Section 5.1
PharmAthene Intellectual Property   Section 4.15(b)
PharmAthene Key Employee   Section 4.14(f)
PharmAthene Material Adverse Effect   Section 9.13(p)
PharmAthene Material Contract   Section 4.18(a)(xix)
PharmAthene Meeting   Section 6.4(d)
PharmAthene Permits   Section 4.7(b)
PharmAthene Post-Signing Returns   Section 6.1(d)(i)
PharmAthene Products   Section 4.21(d)
PharmAthene Recommendation   Section 4.2(a)

A-82


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
Term   Section
PharmAthene Recommendation Withdrawal   Section 6.3(b)
PharmAthene Recommendation Withdrawal Termination Right   Section 8.1(f)
PharmAthene Real Property Subleases   Section 4.16(c)
PharmAthene SEC Documents   Section 4.4(a)
PharmAthene Stock   Section 2.1(a)
PharmAthene Stock Incentive Plan   Section 4.3(a)
PharmAthene Stock Option   Section 9.13(q)
PharmAthene Stockholder Approval   Section 4.24
PharmAthene Stockholder Approval Matters   Section 4.24
PharmAthene Superior Proposal   Section 9.13(r)
PharmAthene Superior Proposal Termination Right   Section 8.1(h)
PharmAthene Stockholder Failure to Consent Termination Right   Section 8.1(d)
PharmAthene Takeover Proposal   Section 9.13(s)
PharmAthene Third Party Intellectual Property   Section 4.15(b)
PharmAthene Voting Agreement   Recitals
Post-Closing Lock-Up Agreement   Recitals
Pro Rata Share   Section 9.13(t)
Proxy Statement   Section 9.13(u)
Real Property Leases   Section 3.15(b)
Real Property Subleases   Section 3.15(c)
Representatives   Section 6.2
S-4 Effective Date   Section 6.4(a)
Sarbanes-Oxley Act   Section 9.13(v)
SEC   Section 9.13(w)
Securities Act   Section 3.3(b)
Securityholders’ Representative   Section 5.7(a)
SPD   Section 3.8(b)
Subsidiaries   Section 9.13(x)
Surviving Subsidiary   Section 1.1
tail   Section 6.9(b)
Theraclone   Preamble
Theraclone Affiliate Transactions   Section 3.21
Theraclone Approvals   Section 3.3(b)
Theraclone Balance Sheet   Section 3.4(a)
Theraclone Benefit Plans   Section 3.8(a)
Theraclone Board Designee   Section 6.13(a)
Theraclone Board of Directors   Recitals
Theraclone Breach Termination Right   Section 8.1(g)
Theraclone Bylaws   Section 3.1(c)
Theraclone Certificate of Incorporation   Section 3.1(c)
Theraclone Common Share   Section 2.1(a)
Theraclone Common Shares   Section 2.1(a)
Theraclone Defined Contribution Plan   Section 6.5(b)
Theraclone Disclosure Schedule   ARTICLE III
Theraclone Financial Statements   Section 3.4(a)
Theraclone Government Contract   Section 3.23(a)
Theraclone Intellectual Property   Section 3.14(b)
Theraclone Key Employee   Section 3.13(f)
Theraclone Material Adverse Effect   Section 9.13(y)
Theraclone Material Contracts   Section 3.18(a)
Theraclone Permits   Section 3.6(b)
Theraclone Post-Signing Returns   Section 6.1(e)(i)

A-83


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
Term   Section
Theraclone Preferred Shares   Section 3.2(a)
Theraclone Preferred Stock   Section 9.13(z)
Theraclone Products   Section 3.22(d)
Theraclone Recommendation   Section 3.3(a)
Theraclone Stock Incentive Plan   Section 9.13(aa)
Theraclone Stock Option   Section 9.13(bb)
Theraclone Stockholder   Section 9.13(cc)
Theraclone Stockholder Approval   Section 3.16
Theraclone Stockholder Approval Matters   Section 3.16
Theraclone Stockholder Written Consent   Section 6.4(c)
Theraclone Stockholders   Section 9.13(cc)
Theraclone Third Party Intellectual Property   Section 3.14(b)
Theraclone Unaudited Interim Balance Sheet   Section 3.4(a)
Theraclone Voting Agreement   Recitals
Theraclone Warrants   Section 9.13(dd)
Tax Law   Section 9.13(ee)
Tax Return   Section 9.13(ff)
Taxes   Section 9.13(ff)
Tier 1 Breakup Fee   Section 8.2(a)(i)
Tier 2 Breakup Fee   Section 8.2(a)(ii)
Termination Date   Section 6.1(a)
Termination Fee   Section 9.13(gg)
Third Party Claim   Section 5.6(a)
Third Party Claim Notice   Section 5.6(a)
Transaction Event   Section 6.3(b)
Transaction Event Withdrawal   Section 6.3(b)
Transaction Prohibition Termination Right   Section 8.1(c)
WARN Act   Section 3.13(e)

(Signature page to follow.)

A-84


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed and delivered as of the date first above written.

PHARMATHENE, INC.

By: /s/ Eric I. Richman
Name: Eric I. Richman
Title: Chief Executive Officer

TAURUS MERGER SUB, INC.

By: /s/ Eric I. Richman
Name: Eric I. Richman
Title: Chief Executive Officer

[Signature page to Agreement and Plan of Merger]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed and delivered as of the date first above written.

THERACLONE SCIENCES, INC.

By: /s/ Clifford J. Stocks
Name: Clifford J. Stocks
Title: Chief Executive Officer

SECURITYHOLDERS’ REPRESENTATIVE

/s/ Steven Gillis, Ph.D.
Steven Gillis, Ph.D.

[Signature page to Agreement and Plan of Merger]

A-85


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ANNEX A
 
APPROVING THERACLONE SCIENCES, INC. STOCKHOLDERS

1. Clifford J. Stocks
2. Steven Gillis, Ph. D.
3. ARCH V Entrepreneurs Fund, L. P.
4. ARCH Venture Fund V, L. P.
5. Hutton Living Trust dated 12/10/96
6. Canaan VII L.P.
7. HealthCare Venture, LLC
8. Dr. Wendye Robbins
9. MPM Asset Management Investors 2003 BVIII LLC
10. MPM BioVentures III, L.P.
11. MPM BioVentures GmbH & Co. Beteiligungs KG
12. MPM BioVentures III Parallel Fund, L.P.
13. MPM BioVentures III-QP, L.P.

A-86


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ANNEX B
  
APPROVING PHARMATHENE, INC. STOCKHOLDERS

1. John M. Gill
2. Brian A. Markison
3. Joel McCleary
4. Eric I. Richman
5. Jeffrey W. Runge, M.D.
6. Mitchel Sayare, Ph.D.
7. Derace L. Schaffer, M.D.
8. Steven St. Peter, M.D.
9. Linda L. Chang
10. Francesca Cook
11. Wayne Morges, Ph.D.
12. Jardan Karp, J.D.

A-87


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ANNEX B

FORM OF PHARMATHENE, INC. VOTING AND LOCK-UP AGREEMENT

This PHARMATHENE, INC. VOTING AND LOCK-UP AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”), dated as of July 31, 2013, is by and between, Theraclone Sciences, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and each of the undersigned stockholders (each, a “Stockholder,” and, collectively, the “Stockholders”) of PharmAthene, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“PharmAthene”), identified on the signature page hereto.

A. The Company, PharmAthene and Taurus Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and direct, wholly owned subsidiary of PharmAthene (“Merger Sub”) and Steven Gillis, Ph.D., solely in its capacity as the representative of the Theraclone Sciences, Inc. Stockholders, are entering into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (as amended from time to time, the “Merger Agreement”), dated as of the date hereof, pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company (the “Merger”), after which time the Company will be a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of PharmAthene;

B. As of the date hereof, each Stockholder is the Beneficial Owner (as defined below) of, and has the sole right to vote and dispose of, that number of each class of the issued and outstanding capital stock of PharmAthene (the “PharmAthene Shares”) set forth opposite such Stockholder’s name on Schedule A hereto; and

C. Concurrently with the entry by the Company, PharmAthene and Merger Sub into the Merger Agreement, and as a condition and inducement to the willingness of the Company to enter into the Merger Agreement and incur the obligations set forth therein, the Company has required that the Stockholders enter into this Agreement.

Accordingly, and in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual representations, warranties, covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:

ARTICLE I.
Definitions

Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Agreement are used in this Agreement with the meanings given to such terms in the Merger Agreement. In addition, for purposes of this Agreement:

Affiliate” means, with respect to any specified person, a person who, at the time of determination, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, such specified person. For purposes of this Agreement, with respect to a Stockholder, “Affiliate” does not include PharmAthene and the persons that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, are controlled by PharmAthene. For the avoidance of doubt, no officer or director of PharmAthene will be deemed an Affiliate of another officer or director of PharmAthene by virtue of his or her status as an officer or director of PharmAthene.

Beneficially Owned” or “Beneficial Ownership” with respect to any securities means having beneficial ownership of such securities (as determined pursuant to Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act, disregarding the phrase “within 60 days” in paragraph (d)(1)(i) thereof), including pursuant to any agreement, arrangement or understanding, whether or not in writing. Without duplicative counting of the same securities, securities Beneficially Owned by a person include securities Beneficially Owned by (i) all Affiliates of such person, and (ii) all other persons with whom such person would constitute a “group” within the meaning of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and the rules promulgated thereunder.

Beneficial Owner” with respect to any securities means a person that has Beneficial Ownership of such securities.

person” has the meaning ascribed thereto in the Merger Agreement.

Subject Shares” means, with respect to a Stockholder, without duplication, (i) the PharmAthene Shares owned by such Stockholder on the date hereof as described on Schedule A, (ii) any additional shares of PharmAthene acquired by such Stockholder, over which such Stockholder acquires Beneficial Ownership from and after the date hereof, whether pursuant to existing stock option agreements, warrants or otherwise, and

B-1


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(iii) any shares into which the PharmAthene Shares may be converted, exchanges or reclassified. Without limiting the other provisions of this Agreement, in the event that PharmAthene changes the number of PharmAthene Shares issued and outstanding prior to the Termination Date as a result of a reclassification, stock split (including a reverse stock split), stock dividend or distribution, combination, recapitalization, subdivision, or other similar transaction, the number of Subject Shares subject to this Agreement will be equitably adjusted to reflect such change.

Transfer” means, with respect to a security, the sale, transfer, pledge, hypothecation, encumbrance, assignment or disposition of such security or the Beneficial Ownership thereof, and each option, agreement, arrangement or understanding, whether or not in writing, to effect any of the foregoing. As a verb, “Transfer” has a correlative meaning.

ARTICLE II.
Covenants of Stockholders

2.1 Irrevocable Proxy.  Concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, each Stockholder agrees to deliver to the Company a proxy in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Proxy”), which will be irrevocable to the extent provided in Section 212 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”), with respect to the Subject Shares referred to therein.

2.2 Agreement to Vote.

(a) Except in the case of a Pieces Recommendation Withdrawal or a Transaction Event Withdrawal, in which event each Stockholder may vote as he, she or it determines in his, her or its discretion, each and every meeting of the stockholders of PharmAthene held prior to the Termination Date (as defined in Article VI), however called, and at every adjournment or postponement thereof prior to the Termination Date, or in connection with each and every written consent of, or any other action by, the stockholders of the Company given or solicited prior to the Termination Date, each Stockholder will vote, or provide a consent with respect to, all of the Subject Shares entitled to vote or to consent thereon (i) in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement, and any actions required in furtherance thereof, and (ii) against any amendment of PharmAthene’s certificate of incorporation or bylaws or any other proposal or transaction involving PharmAthene, the effect of which amendment or other proposal or transaction is to delay, impair, prevent or nullify the Merger or the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement or change in any manner the voting rights of any capital stock of PharmAthene, and against any other action or agreement that would result in a breach in any material respect of any covenant, representation or warranty or any other obligation or agreement of PharmAthene or its shareholders under the Merger Agreement.

(b) No Stockholder will enter into any agreement with any person (other than the Company) prior to the Termination Date (with respect to periods prior to or after the Termination Date) directly or indirectly to vote, grant any proxy or give instructions with respect to the voting of, the Subject Shares in respect of the matters described in Section 2.2 hereof, or the effect of which would be inconsistent with or violate any provision contained in this Section 2.2. Any vote or consent (or withholding of consent) by any Stockholder that is not in accordance with this Section 2.2 will be considered null and void, and the provisions of the Proxy will be deemed to take immediate effect.

2.3 Revocation of Proxies; Cooperation.  Each Stockholder agrees as follows:

(a) Such Stockholder hereby represents and warrants that any proxies heretofore given in respect of the Subject Shares with respect to the matters described in Section 2.2(a) hereof are not irrevocable, and such Stockholder hereby revokes any and all prior proxies with respect to such Subject Shares as they relate to such matters. Prior to the Termination Date, such Stockholder will not directly or indirectly grant any proxies or powers of attorney with respect to the matters set forth in Section 2.2(a) hereof (other than to the Company), deposit any of the Subject Shares or enter into a voting agreement (other than this Agreement) with respect to any of the Subject Shares relating to any matter described in Section 2.2(a).

(b) Such Stockholder will provide any information reasonably requested by the Company or PharmAthene for any regulatory application or filing sought for such transactions.

B-2


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2.4 No Transfer of Subject Shares; Publicity.  Each Stockholder agrees that:

(a) It (i) will not Transfer or agree to Transfer any of the Subject Shares or, with respect to any matter described in Section 2.2(a), grant any proxy or power-of-attorney with respect to any of the Subject Shares, (ii) will take all action reasonably necessary to prevent creditors in respect of any pledge of the Subject Shares from exercising their rights under such pledge, and (iii) will not take any action that would make in a material respect any of its representations or warranties contained herein untrue or incorrect or would have the effect of preventing or disabling such Stockholder from performing any of its material obligations hereunder; provided, however, that Stockholder may (x) transfer shares to Affiliates or charitable organizations, (y) if Stockholder is an individual, transfer the Subject Shares to any member of Stockholder’s immediate family, or to a trust for the benefit of Stockholder or any member of Stockholder’s immediate family for estate planning purposes or for the purposes of personal tax planning, and (z) transfer Subject Shares upon the death of Stockholder (any such transferee permitted under clause (w), (x), (y) and (z), a “Permitted Transferee”); provided, further, that any such Transfer shall be permitted only if, as a precondition to such Transfer, the Permitted Transferee agrees in writing to be bound by all of the terms of this Agreement.

(b) Unless required by applicable Law or permitted by the Merger Agreement, such Stockholder will not, and will not authorize or direct any of its Affiliates or Representatives to, make any press release or public announcement with respect to this Agreement or the Merger Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby, without the prior written consent of the Company in each instance.

ARTICLE III.
Representations, Warranties and Additional Covenants of Stockholders

Each Stockholder represents, warrants and covenants to the Company that:

3.1 Ownership.  Such Stockholder is the sole Beneficial Owner and the record and legal owner of the Subject Shares identified opposite such Stockholder’s name on Schedule A and such shares constitute all of the capital stock of PharmAthene Beneficially Owned by such Stockholder. Such Stockholder has good and valid title to all of the Subject Shares, free and clear of all Liens, claims, options, proxies, voting agreements and security interests and has the sole right to such Subject Shares and there are no restrictions on rights of disposition or other Liens pertaining to such Subject Shares. None of the Subject Shares is subject to any voting trust or other contract with respect to the voting thereof, and no proxy, power of attorney or other authorization has been granted with respect to any of such Subject Shares.

3.2 Authority and Non-Contravention.

(a) Such Stockholder has all necessary power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement, to perform its obligations hereunder and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. The execution and delivery of this Agreement by such Stockholder and the consummation by such Stockholder of the transactions contemplated hereby have been duly and validly authorized by all necessary action, and no other proceedings on the part of such Stockholder are necessary to authorize this Agreement or to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby.

(b) Assuming due authorization, execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Company, this Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered by such Stockholder and constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of such Stockholder, enforceable against such Stockholder in accordance with its terms except (i) to the extent limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency or similar laws affecting creditors’ rights and (ii) the remedy of specific performance and injunctive and other forms of equitable relief may be subject to equitable defenses and to the discretion of the court before which any proceeding therefor may be brought.

(c) Such Stockholder is not nor will it be required to make any filing with or give any notice to, or to obtain any consent from, any person in connection with the execution, delivery or performance of this Agreement or obtain any permit or approval from any Governmental Entity for any of the transactions contemplated hereby, except to the extent required by Section 13 or Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules promulgated thereunder.

B-3


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(d) Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement by such Stockholder nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby will directly or indirectly (whether with notice or lapse of time or both) (i) conflict with, result in any violation of or constitute a default by such Stockholder under any mortgage, bond, indenture, agreement, instrument or obligation to which such Stockholder is a party or by which it or any of the Subject Shares are bound, or violate any permit of any Governmental Entity, or any applicable Law to which such Stockholder, or any of the Subject Shares, may be subject, or (ii) result in the imposition or creation of any Lien upon or with respect to any of the Subject Shares; except, in each case, for conflicts, violations, defaults or Liens that would not individually or in the aggregate be reasonably expected to prevent or materially impair or delay the performance by such Stockholder of its obligations hereunder.

(e) Such Stockholder has sole voting power and sole power to issue instructions with respect to the matters set forth in Article II hereof and sole power to agree to all of the matters set forth in this Agreement, in each case with respect to all of the Subject Shares, with no limitations, qualifications or restrictions on such rights.

3.3 Total Shares.  Except as set forth on Schedule A, no Stockholder is the Beneficial Owner of, and does not have (whether currently, upon lapse of time, following the satisfaction of any conditions, upon the occurrence of any event or any combination of the foregoing) any right to acquire, any PharmAthene Shares or any securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for PharmAthene Shares. No Stockholder has any other interest in or voting rights with respect to any PharmAthene Shares or any securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for PharmAthene Shares.

3.4 Reliance.  Each Stockholder understands and acknowledges that the Company is entering into the Merger Agreement in reliance upon Stockholders’ execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement.

ARTICLE IV.
Representations, Warranties and Covenants of the Company

The Company represents, warrants and covenants to Stockholders that:

(a) The Company has all necessary corporate power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and to perform its obligations hereunder. The execution and delivery by the Company of this Agreement and the consummation by the Company of the transactions contemplated hereby have been duly and validly authorized by the Company and no other corporate proceedings on the part of the Company are necessary to authorize this Agreement or to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby.

(b) Assuming due authorization, execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Stockholders, this Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered by the Company and constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of the Company, enforceable against the Company in accordance with its terms, except (i) to the extent limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency or similar laws affecting creditors’ rights and (ii) the remedy of specific performance and injunctive and other forms of equitable relief may be subject to equitable defenses and to the discretion of the court before which any proceeding therefor may be brought.

ARTICLE V.
Dissenters’ Rights.

5.1 Stockholder agrees not to exercise any rights of appraisal or any dissenters’ rights that Stockholder may have (whether under applicable Law or otherwise) or could potentially have or acquire in connection with the Merger.

B-4


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ARTICLE VI.
Term and Termination

6.1 This Agreement will become effective upon its execution by the Stockholders and the Company. This Agreement will terminate upon the earliest of (a) the Effective Time, (b) the termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with Article VIII thereof, (c) written notice by the Company to the Stockholders of the termination of this Agreement, or (d) any PharmAthene Recommendation Withdrawal or Transaction Event Withdrawal (the date of the earliest of the events described in clauses (a), (b), (c), and (d), the “Termination Date”). Notwithstanding the foregoing, Article VII of this Agreement shall survive any termination hereof.

ARTICLE VII.
General Provisions

7.1 Action in Stockholder Capacity Only.  Each Stockholder is entering into this Agreement solely in such Stockholder’s capacity as a record holder and beneficial owner, as applicable, of the Subject Shares and not in such Stockholder’s capacity as a director or officer of PharmAthene. Notwithstanding any asserted conflict, nothing herein will limit or affect any Stockholder’s ability to act as an officer or director of PharmAthene, including, if Stockholder is a director of PharmAthene, its ability to vote in favor of a PharmAthene Recommendation Withdrawal or Transaction Event Withdrawal, or to make any presentations to the PharmAthene Board of Directors or take any other action that he or she determines to be necessary or appropriate in his or her discretion, without regard to this Agreement or any conflict of interest.

7.2 No Ownership Interest.  Nothing contained in this Agreement will be deemed to vest in the Company or any of its Affiliates any direct or indirect ownership or incidents of ownership of or with respect to the Subject Shares. All rights, ownership and economic benefits of and relating to the Subject Shares will remain and belong to the Stockholders, and neither the Company nor any of its Affiliates will have any authority to manage, direct, superintend, restrict, regulate, govern or administer any of the policies or operations of PharmAthene or exercise any power or authority to direct any Stockholder in the voting of any of the Subject Shares, except as otherwise expressly provided herein or in the Merger Agreement.

7.3 Notices.  All notices, consents, waivers and other communications under this Agreement must be in writing (including facsimile or similar writing) and must be given:

If to the Company, to:
Theraclone Sciences, Inc.
Seattle Life Sciences Building
1124 Columbia Street, Suite 300
Seattle, WA 98104
Attention: Chief Executive Officer
Facsimile No: (206) 805-1699
 
with a copy (which will not constitute notice) to:
Fenwick & West LLP
1191 Second Avenue, 10th Floor
Seattle, WA 98101
Attention: Stephen M. Graham
Telecopy: (206) 389-4511
 
If to any Stockholder, to such Stockholder at its address set forth on Schedule A,

or such other address or facsimile number as a party may hereafter specify for the purpose by notice to the other parties hereto. Each notice, consent, waiver or other communication under this Agreement will be effective only (a) if given by facsimile, when the facsimile is transmitted to the facsimile number specified in this Section and the appropriate facsimile confirmation is received or (b) if given by overnight courier or personal delivery when delivered at the address specified in this Section.

B-5


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

7.4 Further Actions.  Upon the request of any party to this Agreement, the other party will (a) furnish to the requesting party any additional information, (b) execute and deliver, at their own expense, any other documents and (c) take any other actions as the requesting party may reasonably require to more effectively carry out the intent of this Agreement. Each Stockholder hereby agrees that the Company and PharmAthene may publish and disclose in the Form S-4 Registration Statement and Proxy Statement (including all documents and schedules filed with the SEC) such Stockholder’s identity and ownership of Subject Shares and the nature of such Stockholder’s commitments, arrangements, and understandings under this Agreement and may further file this Agreement as an exhibit to the Form S-4 Registration Statement or in any other filing made by the Company and/or PharmAthene with the SEC relating to the Merger Agreement or the transactions contemplated thereby. Each Stockholder agrees to notify the Company promptly of any additional shares of capital stock of PharmAthene of which such Stockholder becomes the record or beneficial owner after the date of this Agreement.

7.5 Entire Agreement and Modification.  This Agreement, the Proxy and any other documents delivered by the parties in connection herewith constitute the entire agreement among the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersede all prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral, between the parties with respect to its subject matter and constitute (along with the documents delivered pursuant to this Agreement) a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement between the parties with respect to its subject matter. This Agreement may not be amended, supplemented or otherwise modified except by a written document executed by the party against whose interest the modification will operate. The parties will not enter into any other agreement inconsistent with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Proxy, or that addresses any of the subject matters addressed in this Agreement and the Proxy.

7.6 Drafting and Representation.  The parties agree that the terms and language of this Agreement were the result of negotiations between the parties and, as a result, there will be no presumption that any ambiguities in this Agreement will be resolved against any party. Any controversy over construction of this Agreement will be decided without regard to events of authorship or negotiation.

7.7 Severability.  Any provision of this Agreement which is prohibited or unenforceable in any jurisdiction will, as to such jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition or unenforceability without affecting the validity or enforceability of the remaining provisions hereof. Any such prohibition or unenforceability in any jurisdiction will not invalidate or render unenforceable such provision in any other jurisdiction. If any provision of this Agreement is so broad as to be unenforceable, the provision will be interpreted to be only so broad as is enforceable.

7.8 No Third-Party Rights.  No Stockholder may assign any of its rights or delegate any of its obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the Company. The Company may not assign any of its rights or delegate any of its obligations under this Agreement with respect to any Stockholder without the prior written consent of such Stockholder. This Agreement will apply to, be binding in all respects upon, and inure to the benefit of each of the respective successors, personal or legal representatives, heirs, distributes, devisees, legatees, executors, administrators and permitted assigns of any Stockholder and the successors and permitted assigns of the Company. Nothing expressed or referred to in this Agreement will be construed to give any person, other than the parties to this Agreement, any legal or equitable right, remedy or claim under or with respect to this Agreement or any provision of this Agreement except such rights as may inure to a successor or permitted assignee under this Section.

7.9 Enforcement of Agreement.  Each Stockholder acknowledges and agrees that the Company could be damaged irreparably if any of the provisions of this Agreement are not performed in accordance with their specific terms and that any breach of this Agreement by any Stockholder could not be adequately compensated by monetary damages. Accordingly, each Stockholder agrees that, (a) it will waive, in any action for specific performance, the defense of adequacy of a remedy at law, and (b) in addition to any other right or remedy to which the Company may be entitled, at law or in equity, the Company will be entitled to enforce any provision of this Agreement by a decree of specific performance and to temporary, preliminary and permanent injunctive relief to prevent breaches or threatened breaches of any of the provisions of this Agreement, without posting any bond or other undertaking.

B-6


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

7.10 Waiver.  The rights and remedies of the parties to this Agreement are cumulative and not alternative. Neither any failure nor any delay by a party in exercising any right, power or privilege under this Agreement, the Proxy or any of the documents referred to in this Agreement will operate as a waiver of such right, power or privilege, and no single or partial exercise of any such right, power or privilege will preclude any other or further exercise of such right, power or privilege or the exercise of any other right, power or privilege. To the maximum extent permitted by applicable Law, (a) no claim or right arising out of this Agreement, the Proxy or any of the documents referred to in this Agreement can be discharged by one party, in whole or in part, by a waiver or renunciation of the claim or right unless in a written document signed by the other party, (b) no waiver that may be given by a party will be applicable except in the specific instance for which it is given, and (c) no notice to or demand on one party will be deemed to be a waiver of any obligation of that party or of the right of the party giving such notice or demand to take further action without notice or demand as provided in this Agreement, the Proxy or the documents referred to in this Agreement.

7.11 Governing Law.  This Agreement and all acts and transactions pursuant hereto and the rights and obligations of the parties hereto will be governed by, construed under and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to principles of conflict or choice of laws.

7.12 Consent to Jurisdiction.  Any suit, action or proceeding seeking to enforce any provision of, or based on any matter arising out of or in connection with, this Agreement, the Proxy or the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby will be brought exclusively in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware or, if such court does not have jurisdiction over the subject matter of such proceeding or if such jurisdiction is not available, in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, County of New Castle, and each of the parties hereby consents to the exclusive jurisdiction of those courts (and of the appropriate appellate courts therefrom) in any suit, action or proceeding and irrevocably waives, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable Law, any objection which it may now or hereafter have to the laying of the venue of any suit, action or proceeding in any of those courts or that any suit, action or proceeding which is brought in any of those courts has been brought in an inconvenient forum. Process in any suit, action or proceeding may be served on any party anywhere in the world, whether within or without the jurisdiction of any of the named courts. Without limiting the foregoing, each party agrees that service of process on it by notice as provided in Section 6.3 will be deemed effective service of process. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, ALL RIGHTS TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY ACTION, PROCEEDING OR COUNTERCLAIM (WHETHER BASED ON CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE) ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY OF THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY.

7.13 Counterparts.  This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original, but all of which, taken together, will constitute one and the same instrument. A facsimile or electronic copy of a party’s signature printed by a receiving facsimile machine or printer (including signatures in Adobe PDF or similar format) shall be deemed an original signature for purposes hereof.

7.14 Expenses.  Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, all costs and expenses incurred in connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby will be paid by the party incurring such expenses.

7.15 Headings; Construction.  The headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and will not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. In this Agreement (a) words denoting the singular include the plural and vice versa, (b) “it” or “its” or words denoting any gender include all genders and (c) the word “including” means “including without limitation,” whether or not expressed.

[Signature page follows]

B-7


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this PharmAthene Voting and Lock-Up Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.

 
THE COMPANY:   THERACLONE SCIENCES, INC.
    

By:

  
Name:
Title:

STOCKHOLDERS:


John M. Gill
 
 

Brian A. Markison
 
 

Joel McCleary
 
 

Eric I. Richman
 
 
Jeffrey W. Runge, M.D.
 
 

Mitchel Sayare, Ph.D.
 
 

Derace L. Schaffer, M.D.
 
 
Steven St. Peter, M.D.
 
 

Linda L. Chang
 
 

Francesca Cook
 
 

Wayne Morges, Ph.D.
 
 

Jordan Karp, J.D.

[Signature Page to Voting and Lock-Up Agreement]

B-8


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SCHEDULE A

STOCKHOLDERS

 
NAME AND ADDRESS OF STOCKHOLDERS   PHARMATHENE
SHARES
BENEFICIALLY
OWNED
John M. Gill     152,759  
Brian A. Markison     40,000  
Joel McCleary     288,559  
Eric I. Richman     1,098,183  
Jeffrey W. Runge, M.D.     117,700  
Mitchel Sayare, Ph.D.     155,414  
Derace L. Schaffer, M.D.     1,261,043  
Steven St. Peter, M.D.     20,000  
Linda L. Chang     87,500  
Francesca Cook     370,843  
Wayne Morges, Ph.D.     N/A  
Jordan Karp, J.D.     392,371  

B-9


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXHIBIT A

FORM OF IRREVOCABLE PROXY

From and after the date hereof and until the Termination Date (as defined below), on which date this proxy will terminate and be of no further force or effect, the undersigned stockholder (“Stockholder”) of PharmAthene, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“PharmAthene”), hereby irrevocably (to the full extent permitted by Section 212 of the Delaware General Corporation Law) grants to, and appoints, Theraclone Sciences, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and any designee of the Company, and each of them individually, as the sole and exclusive attorney and proxy of the undersigned, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, to vote the Subject Shares (as defined in the Voting Agreement) of the Stockholder, or grant a consent or approval in respect of the Subject Shares of the Stockholder, in a manner consistent with Section 2.2 of the Voting Agreement (as defined below). Upon the undersigned’s execution of this Proxy, any and all prior proxies given by the undersigned with respect to any Subject Shares relating to the voting rights expressly provided herein are hereby revoked and the undersigned agrees not to grant any subsequent proxies with respect to the Subject Shares relating to such voting rights at any time prior to the Termination Date, on which date this proxy will terminate and be of no further force or effect.

This Proxy is irrevocable, is coupled with an interest and is granted pursuant to that certain PharmAthene Voting and Lock-Up Agreement (as amended from time to time, the “Voting Agreement”) of even date herewith, by and among the Company and Stockholder, and is granted in consideration of the Company entering into the Merger Agreement (as defined in the Voting Agreement). As used herein, the term “Termination Date,” and all capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined, will have the meanings set forth in the Voting Agreement. The Stockholder agrees that this proxy will be irrevocable until the Termination Date, on which date this proxy will terminate and be of no further force or effect, and is coupled with an interest sufficient at law to support an irrevocable proxy and given to the Company as an inducement to enter into the Merger Agreement and, to the extent permitted under applicable law, will be valid and binding on any person to whom Stockholder may transfer any of his, her or its Subject Shares in breach of the Voting Agreement. The Stockholder hereby ratifies and confirms all that such irrevocable proxy may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

The attorneys and proxies named above, and each of them, are hereby authorized and empowered by the undersigned, at any time prior to the Termination Date, on which date this proxy will terminate and be of no further force or effect, to act as the undersigned’s attorney and proxy to vote the Subject Shares, and to exercise all voting and other rights of the undersigned with respect to the Subject Shares (including, without limitation, the power to execute and deliver written consents pursuant to Section 228 of the Delaware General Corporation Law), at every annual, special or adjourned meeting of the stockholders of the Company and in every written consent in lieu of such meeting in a manner consistent with Section 2.2 of the Voting Agreement.

This Proxy will be binding upon the heirs, estate, executors, personal representatives, successors and assigns of Stockholder (including any transferee of any of the Subject Shares), and all authority herein conferred or agreed to be conferred will survive the death or incapacity of the Stockholder.

If any provision of this Proxy or any part of any such provision is held under any circumstances to be invalid or unenforceable in any jurisdiction, then (a) such provision or part thereof will, with respect to such circumstances and in such jurisdiction, be deemed amended to conform to applicable laws so as to be valid and enforceable to the fullest possible extent, (b) the invalidity or unenforceability of such provision or part thereof under such circumstances and in such jurisdiction will not affect the validity or enforceability of such provision or part thereof under any other circumstances or in any other jurisdiction, and (c) the invalidity or unenforceability of such provision or part thereof will not affect the validity or enforceability of the remainder of such provision or the validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Proxy. Each provision of this Proxy is separable from every other provision of this Proxy, and each part of each provision of this Proxy is separable from every other part of such provision.

Dated:


Name:

B-10


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ANNEX C

FORM OF THERACLONE VOTING AND LOCK-UP AGREEMENT

This THERACLONE VOTING AND LOCK-UP AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”), dated as of July 31, 2013, is by and between, PharmAthene, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and each of the undersigned stockholders (each, a “Stockholder,” and, collectively, the “Stockholders”) of Theraclone Sciences, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Theraclone”), identified on the signature page hereto.

A. The Company, Theraclone and Taurus Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and direct, wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”) and Steven Gillis, Ph.D., solely in its capacity as the representative of the Theraclone Stockholders, are entering into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (as amended from time to time, the “Merger Agreement”), dated as of the date hereof, pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into Theraclone (the “Merger”), after which time Theraclone will be a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of the Company;

B. As of the date hereof, each Stockholder is the Beneficial Owner (as defined below) of, and has the sole (subject to applicable community property laws) right to vote and dispose of, that number of each class of the issued and outstanding capital stock (the “Theraclone Shares”) of Theraclone set forth opposite such Stockholder’s name on Schedule A hereto; and

C. Concurrently with the entry by the Company, Theraclone and Merger Sub into the Merger Agreement, and as a condition and inducement to the willingness of the Company to enter into the Merger Agreement and incur the obligations set forth therein, the Company has required that the Stockholders enter into this Agreement.

Accordingly, and in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual representations, warranties, covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:

ARTICLE I.
Definitions

Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Agreement are used in this Agreement with the meanings given to such terms in the Merger Agreement. In addition, for purposes of this Agreement:

Affiliate” means, with respect to any specified person, a person who, at the time of determination, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, such specified person. For purposes of this Agreement, with respect to a Stockholder, “Affiliate” does not include Theraclone and the persons that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, are controlled by Theraclone. For the avoidance of doubt, no officer or director of Theraclone will be deemed an Affiliate of another officer or director of Theraclone by virtue of his or her status as an officer or director of Theraclone.

Beneficially Owned” or “Beneficial Ownership” with respect to any securities means having beneficial ownership of such securities (as determined pursuant to Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act, disregarding the phrase “within 60 days” in paragraph (d)(1)(i) thereof), including pursuant to any agreement, arrangement or understanding, whether or not in writing. Without duplicative counting of the same securities, securities Beneficially Owned by a person include securities Beneficially Owned by (i) all Affiliates of such person, and (ii) all other persons with whom such person would constitute a “group” within the meaning of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and the rules promulgated thereunder.

Beneficial Owner” with respect to any securities means a person that has Beneficial Ownership of such securities.

person” has the meaning ascribed thereto in the Merger Agreement.

Subject Shares” means, with respect to a Stockholder, without duplication, (i) the Theraclone Shares owned by such Stockholder on the date hereof as described on Schedule A, (ii) any additional shares of Theraclone acquired by such Stockholder, over which such Stockholder acquires Beneficial Ownership from and after the date hereof, whether pursuant to existing stock option agreements, warrants or otherwise, and

C-1


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(iii) any shares into which the Theraclone Shares may be converted, exchanges or reclassified. Without limiting the other provisions of this Agreement, in the event that Theraclone changes the number of Theraclone Shares issued and outstanding prior to the Expiration Date (as defined below) as a result of a reclassification, stock split (including a reverse stock split), stock dividend or distribution, combination, recapitalization, subdivision, or other similar transaction, the number of Subject Shares subject to this Agreement will be equitably adjusted to reflect such change.

Transfer” means, with respect to a security, the sale, transfer, pledge, hypothecation, encumbrance, assignment or disposition of such security or the Beneficial Ownership thereof, and each option, agreement, arrangement or understanding, whether or not in writing, to effect any of the foregoing. As a verb, “Transfer” has a correlative meaning.

ARTICLE II.
Covenants of Stockholders

2.1 Irrevocable Proxy.  Concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, each Stockholder agrees to deliver to the Company a proxy in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Proxy”), which will be irrevocable to the extent provided in Section 212 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, with respect to the Subject Shares referred to therein.

2.2 Agreement to Vote.

(a) At each and every meeting of the stockholders of Theraclone held prior to the Expiration Date, however called, and at every adjournment or postponement thereof prior to the Expiration Date, or in connection with each and every written consent of, or any other action by, the stockholders of Theraclone given or solicited prior to the Expiration Date, each Stockholder will vote, or provide a consent with respect to, all of the Subject Shares entitled to vote or to consent thereon (i) in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and any actions required in furtherance thereof, (ii) in favor of the approval of the conversion of all outstanding shares of Theraclone Preferred Stock into Theraclone Common Shares on a 1:1 basis (as of immediately prior to the Effective Time and contingent upon the Merger occurring) pursuant to Theraclone’ Restated Certificate of Incorporation, (iii) against any other proposal or transaction involving Theraclone, the effect of which amendment or other proposal or transaction is to delay, impair, prevent or nullify the Merger or the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, (iv) against any amendment of Theraclone’s certificate of incorporation or bylaws that changes in any manner the voting rights of any capital stock of Theraclone (other than the conversion of Theraclone Preferred Stock into Theraclone Common Shares), and (v) against any other action or agreement that would result in a breach in any material respect of any covenant, representation or warranty of the Merger Agreement.

(b) No Stockholder will enter into any agreement with any person (other than the Company) prior to the Expiration Date (with respect to periods prior to or after the Expiration Date) directly or indirectly to vote, grant any proxy or give instructions with respect to the voting of, the Subject Shares in respect of the matters described in Section 2.2 hereof, or the effect of which would be inconsistent with or violate any provision contained in this Section 2.2. Any vote or consent (or withholding of consent) by any Stockholder that is not in accordance with this Section 2.2 will be considered null and void, and the provisions of the Proxy will be deemed to take immediate effect.

2.3 Revocation of Proxies; Cooperation.  Each Stockholder agrees as follows:

(a) Such Stockholder hereby represents and warrants that any proxies heretofore given in respect of the Subject Shares with respect to the matters described in Section 2.2(a) hereof are not irrevocable, and such Stockholder hereby revokes any and all prior proxies with respect to such Subject Shares as they relate to such matters. Prior to the Expiration Date, such Stockholder will not directly or indirectly grant any proxies or powers of attorney with respect to the matters set forth in Section 2.2(a) hereof (other than to the Company), deposit any of the Subject Shares or enter into a voting agreement (other than this Agreement) with respect to any of the Subject Shares relating to any matter described in Section 2.2(a).

(b) Such Stockholder will provide any information reasonably requested by the Company or Theraclone for any regulatory application or filing sought for such transactions.

C-2


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2.4 No Transfer of Subject Shares; Publicity.  Each Stockholder agrees that:

(a) It (i) will not Transfer or agree to Transfer any of the Subject Shares or, with respect to any matter described in Section 2.2(a), grant any proxy or power-of-attorney with respect to any of the Subject Shares, (ii) will take all action reasonably necessary to prevent creditors in respect of any pledge of the Subject Shares from exercising their rights under such pledge, and (iii) will not take any action that would make in a material respect any of its representations or warranties contained herein untrue or incorrect or would have the effect of preventing or disabling such Stockholder from performing any of its material obligations hereunder; provided, however, that Stockholder may (w) transfer shares to Affiliates or charitable organizations, (x) if Stockholder is a private equity fund and/or venture capital fund, distribute Subject Shares to its partners, members and equity holders, (y) if Stockholder is an individual, transfer the Subject Shares to any member of Stockholder’s immediate family, or to a trust for the benefit of Stockholder or any member of Stockholder’s immediate family for estate planning purposes or for the purposes of personal tax planning, and (z) transfer Subject Shares upon the death of Stockholder (any such transferee permitted under clause (w), (x), (y) and (z), a “Permitted Transferee”); provided, further, that any such Transfer shall be permitted only if, as a precondition to such Transfer, the Permitted Transferee agrees in writing to be bound by all of the terms of this Agreement, and provided, further, if Stockholder is a holder of shares of Theraclone Preferred Stock, Stockholder may exchange such shares of Theraclone Preferred Stock for Theraclone Common Shares upon the conversion or deemed conversion of such shares of Theraclone Preferred Stock, which Theraclone Common Shares issued as a result of such conversion will be deemed Subject Shares hereunder; and provided further, that any such Transfer shall be permitted only if made in compliance with applicable securities laws.

(b) Unless required by applicable Law or permitted by the Merger Agreement, such Stockholder will not, and will not authorize or direct any of its Affiliates or Representatives to, make any press release or public announcement with respect to this Agreement or the Merger Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby, without the prior written consent of the Company in each instance.

ARTICLE III.
Representations, Warranties and Additional Covenants of Stockholders

Each Stockholder represents, warrants and covenants to the Company that:

3.1 Ownership.  Such Stockholder is the sole Beneficial Owner and the record and legal owner of the Subject Shares identified opposite such Stockholder’s name on Schedule A and such shares constitute all of the capital stock of Theraclone Beneficially Owned by such Stockholder. Such Stockholder has good and valid title to all of the Subject Shares, free and clear of all Liens, written claims, options, proxies, voting agreements and security interests and has the sole right to such Subject Shares and there are no restrictions on rights of disposition or other Liens pertaining to such Subject Shares. Except pursuant to (i) that certain Fourth Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement, dated as of March 11, 2013, between Theraclone and certain holders of its capital stock (the “Stockholders’ Agreement”), the terms of which Partnership Agreement do not conflict with the terms hereof or the obligations of such Stockholder hereunder, and/or (ii) if Stockholder is a partnership, limited partnership, a limited liability company or similar entity, the rights and interests of persons and entities that own partnership interests, units or other equity interests in Stockholder under the partnership agreement, limited partnership agreement, operating agreement or other governing document governing Stockholder and applicable Law) (a “Partnership Agreement”), the terms of which Partnership Agreement do not conflict with the terms hereof or the obligations of such Stockholder hereunder, none of the Subject Shares is subject to any voting trust or other contract with respect to the voting thereof, and no proxy, power of attorney or other authorization has been granted with respect to any of such Subject Shares.

3.2 Authority and Non-Contravention.

(a) Such Stockholder has all necessary power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement, to perform its obligations hereunder and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby, including under any Partnership Agreement. If Stockholder is an entity, the execution and delivery of this Agreement by such Stockholder and the consummation by such Stockholder of the transactions contemplated hereby have been duly and validly authorized by all necessary action, including under any

C-3


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Partnership Agreement, and no other proceedings on the part of such Stockholder are necessary to authorize this Agreement or to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby.

(b) Assuming due authorization, execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Company, this Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered by such Stockholder and constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of such Stockholder, enforceable against such Stockholder in accordance with its terms except (i) to the extent limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency or similar laws affecting creditors’ rights and (ii) the remedy of specific performance and injunctive and other forms of equitable relief may be subject to equitable defenses and to the discretion of the court before which any proceeding therefor may be brought.

(c) Such Stockholder is not nor will it be required to make any filing with or give any notice to, or to obtain any consent from, any person in connection with the execution, delivery or performance of this Agreement or obtain any permit or approval from any Governmental Entity for any of the transactions contemplated hereby, except to the extent required by Section 13 or Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules promulgated thereunder.

(d) Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement by such Stockholder nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby will directly or indirectly (whether with notice or lapse of time or both) (i) conflict with, result in any violation of or constitute a default by such Stockholder under any mortgage, bond, indenture, agreement, instrument or obligation to which such Stockholder is a party or by which it or any of the Subject Shares are bound, or violate any permit of any Governmental Entity, or any applicable Law to which such Stockholder, or any of the Subject Shares, may be subject, or (ii) result in the imposition or creation of any Lien upon or with respect to any of the Subject Shares; except, in each case, for conflicts, violations, defaults or Liens that would not individually or in the aggregate be reasonably expected to prevent or materially impair or delay the performance by such Stockholder of its obligations hereunder.

(e) Subject to applicable community property laws, such Stockholder has sole voting power and sole power to issue instructions with respect to the matters set forth in Article II hereof and sole power to agree to all of the matters set forth in this Agreement, in each case with respect to all of the Subject Shares, with no limitations, qualifications or restrictions on such rights.

3.3 Total Shares. Except as set forth on Schedule A, no Stockholder is the Beneficial Owner of, and does not have (whether currently, upon lapse of time, following the satisfaction of any conditions, upon the occurrence of any event or any combination of the foregoing) any right to acquire, any Theraclone Shares or any securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for Theraclone Shares. Except as set forth in the Stockholders’ Agreement and/or in a Partnership Agreement, no Stockholder has any other interest in or voting rights with respect to any Theraclone Shares or any securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for Theraclone Shares.

3.4 Reliance. Each Stockholder understands and acknowledges that the Company is entering into the Merger Agreement in reliance upon Stockholders’ execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement.

3.5 Marital Status. Each married Stockholder shall cause his or her spouse to execute and deliver to the Company a Spousal Consent in the form of that attached hereto, and should any other Stockholder hereafter become married, such Stockholder shall promptly cause his or her spouse to execute and deliver to the Company a Spousal Consent in such form.

ARTICLE IV.
Representations, Warranties and Covenants of the Company

The Company represents, warrants and covenants to Stockholders that:

(a) The Company has all necessary corporate power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and to perform its obligations hereunder. The execution and delivery by the Company of this Agreement and the consummation by the Company of the transactions contemplated hereby have been

C-4


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

duly and validly authorized by the Company and no other corporate proceedings on the part of the Company are necessary to authorize this Agreement or to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby.

(b) Assuming due authorization, execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Stockholders, this Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered by the Company and constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of the Company, enforceable against the Company in accordance with its terms, except (i) to the extent limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency or similar laws affecting creditors’ rights and (ii) the remedy of specific performance and injunctive and other forms of equitable relief may be subject to equitable defenses and to the discretion of the court before which any proceeding therefor may be brought.

ARTICLE V.
Dissenters’ Rights.

5.1 Stockholder agrees not to exercise any rights of appraisal or any dissenters’ rights that Stockholder may have (whether under applicable Law or otherwise) or could potentially have or acquire in connection with the Merger.

ARTICLE VI.
Termination of Existing Agreements

6.1 If and to the extent Stockholder is a party to any of the agreements specified in Schedule B hereto, Stockholder hereby agrees to the termination of such agreements, such termination to be effective immediately prior to the Effective Time.

ARTICLE VII.
Term and Termination

7.1 This Agreement will become effective upon its execution by the Stockholders and the Company. This Agreement will terminate upon the earliest of (a) the Effective Time, (b) the termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with Article VIII thereof, or (c) written notice by the Company to the Stockholders of the termination of this Agreement (the date of the earliest of the events described in clauses (a), (b), and (c), the “Expiration Date”). Notwithstanding the foregoing, Article IX of this Agreement shall survive any termination hereof.

ARTICLE VIII.
General Provisions

8.1 No Ownership Interest.  Nothing contained in this Agreement will be deemed to vest in the Company or any of its Affiliates any direct or indirect ownership or incidents of ownership of or with respect to the Subject Shares. All rights, ownership and economic benefits of and relating to the Subject Shares will remain and belong to the Stockholders, and neither the Company nor any of its Affiliates will have any authority to manage, direct, superintend, restrict, regulate, govern or administer any of the policies or operations of Theraclone or exercise any power or authority to direct any Stockholder in the voting of any of the Subject Shares, except as otherwise expressly provided herein or in the Merger Agreement.

8.2 Notices.  All notices, consents, waivers and other communications under this Agreement must be in writing (including facsimile or similar writing) and must be given:

If to the Company, to:

PharmAthene, Inc.
One Park Place, Suite #450
Annapolis, MD 21401
Attention: General Counsel
Facsimile No: 410-269-2601

C-5


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

with a copy (which will not constitute notice) to:

Dentons US LLP
1221 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10020-1089
Attention: Jeffrey A. Baumel, Esq.
         Stephan J. Mallenbaum, Esq.

Facsimile No.: (212) 768-6800

If to any Stockholder, to such Stockholder at its address set forth on Schedule A,

with a copy (which will not constitute notice) to:

Fenwick & West LLP
1191 Second Avenue, 10th Floor
Seattle, WA 98101
Attention: Stephen M. Graham
Facsimile No.: (206) 389-4511

or such other address or facsimile number as a party may hereafter specify for the purpose by notice to the other parties hereto. Each notice, consent, waiver or other communication under this Agreement will be effective only (a) if given by facsimile, when the facsimile is transmitted to the facsimile number specified in this Section and the appropriate facsimile confirmation is received or (b) if given by overnight courier or personal delivery when delivered at the address specified in this Section.

8.3 Further Actions.  Upon the request of any party to this Agreement, the other party will (a) furnish to the requesting party any additional information, (b) execute and deliver, at the Company’s expense, any other documents and (c) take any other actions as the requesting party may reasonably require to more effectively carry out the intent of this Agreement. Each Stockholder hereby agrees that the Company and Theraclone may publish and disclose in the Form S-4 Registration Statement and Proxy Statement (including all documents and schedules filed with the SEC) such Stockholder’s identity and ownership of Subject Shares and the nature of such Stockholder’s commitments, arrangements, and understandings under this Agreement and may further file this Agreement as an exhibit to the Form S-4 Registration Statement or in any other filing made by the Company and/or Theraclone with the SEC relating to the Merger Agreement or the transactions contemplated thereby. Each Stockholder agrees to notify the Company promptly of any additional shares of capital stock of Theraclone of which such Stockholder becomes the record or beneficial owner after the date of this Agreement.

8.4 Entire Agreement and Modification.  This Agreement, the Proxy and any other documents delivered by the parties in connection herewith constitute the entire agreement among the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersede all prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral, between the parties with respect to its subject matter and constitute (along with the documents delivered pursuant to this Agreement) a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement between the parties with respect to its subject matter. This Agreement may not be amended, supplemented or otherwise modified except by a written document executed by the party against whose interest the modification will operate. The parties will not enter into any other agreement inconsistent with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Proxy, or that addresses any of the subject matters addressed in this Agreement and the Proxy.

8.5 Drafting and Representation.  The parties agree that the terms and language of this Agreement were the result of negotiations between the parties and, as a result, there will be no presumption that any ambiguities in this Agreement will be resolved against any party. Any controversy over construction of this Agreement will be decided without regard to events of authorship or negotiation.

C-6


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

8.6 Severability.  Any provision of this Agreement which is prohibited or unenforceable in any jurisdiction will, as to such jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition or unenforceability without affecting the validity or enforceability of the remaining provisions hereof. Any such prohibition or unenforceability in any jurisdiction will not invalidate or render unenforceable such provision in any other jurisdiction. If any provision of this Agreement is so broad as to be unenforceable, the provision will be interpreted to be only so broad as is enforceable.

8.7 No Third-Party Rights.  No Stockholder may assign any of its rights or delegate any of its obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the Company, except a Transfer by a Stockholder to a Permitted Transferee in accordance with Section 2.4. The Company may not assign any of its rights or delegate any of its obligations under this Agreement with respect to any Stockholder without the prior written consent of such Stockholder. This Agreement will apply to, be binding in all respects upon, and inure to the benefit of each of the respective successors, personal or legal representatives, heirs, distributes, devisees, legatees, executors, administrators and permitted assigns of any Stockholder and the successors and permitted assigns of the Company. Nothing expressed or referred to in this Agreement will be construed to give any person, other than the parties to this Agreement, any legal or equitable right, remedy or claim under or with respect to this Agreement or any provision of this Agreement except such rights as may inure to a successor or permitted assignee under this Section.

8.8 Enforcement of Agreement.  Each Stockholder acknowledges and agrees that the Company could be damaged irreparably if any of the provisions of this Agreement are not performed in accordance with their specific terms and that any breach of this Agreement by any Stockholder could not be adequately compensated by monetary damages. Accordingly, each Stockholder agrees that, (a) it will waive, in any action for specific performance, the defense of adequacy of a remedy at law, and (b) in addition to any other right or remedy to which the Company may be entitled, at law or in equity, the Company will be entitled to enforce any provision of this Agreement by a decree of specific performance and to temporary, preliminary and permanent injunctive relief to prevent breaches or threatened breaches of any of the provisions of this Agreement, without posting any bond or other undertaking.

8.9 Waiver.  The rights and remedies of the parties to this Agreement are cumulative and not alternative. Neither any failure nor any delay by a party in exercising any right, power or privilege under this Agreement, the Proxy or any of the documents referred to in this Agreement will operate as a waiver of such right, power or privilege, and no single or partial exercise of any such right, power or privilege will preclude any other or further exercise of such right, power or privilege or the exercise of any other right, power or privilege. To the maximum extent permitted by applicable Law, (a) no claim or right arising out of this Agreement, the Proxy or any of the documents referred to in this Agreement can be discharged by one party, in whole or in part, by a waiver or renunciation of the claim or right unless in a written document signed by the other party, (b) no waiver that may be given by a party will be applicable except in the specific instance for which it is given, and (c) no notice to or demand on one party will be deemed to be a waiver of any obligation of that party or of the right of the party giving such notice or demand to take further action without notice or demand as provided in this Agreement, the Proxy or the documents referred to in this Agreement.

8.10 Governing Law.  This Agreement and all acts and transactions pursuant hereto and the rights and obligations of the parties hereto will be governed by, construed under and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to principles of conflict or choice of laws.

8.11 Consent to Jurisdiction.  Any suit, action or proceeding seeking to enforce any provision of, or based on any matter arising out of or in connection with, this Agreement, the Proxy or the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby will be brought exclusively in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware or, if such court does not have jurisdiction over the subject matter of such proceeding or if such jurisdiction is not available, in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, County of New Castle, and each of the parties hereby consents to the exclusive jurisdiction of those courts (and of the appropriate appellate courts therefrom) in any suit, action or proceeding and irrevocably waives, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable Law, any objection which it may now or hereafter have to the laying of the venue of any suit, action or proceeding in any of those courts or that any suit, action or proceeding which is brought in any of those courts has been brought in an inconvenient forum. Process in any suit, action or proceeding may

C-7


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

be served on any party anywhere in the world, whether within or without the jurisdiction of any of the named courts. Without limiting the foregoing, each party agrees that service of process on it by notice as provided in Section 8.2 will be deemed effective service of process. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, ALL RIGHTS TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY ACTION, PROCEEDING OR COUNTERCLAIM (WHETHER BASED ON CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE) ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY OF THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY.

8.12 Counterparts.  This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original, but all of which, taken together, will constitute one and the same instrument. A facsimile or electronic copy of a party’s signature printed by a receiving facsimile machine or printer (including signatures in Adobe PDF or similar format) shall be deemed an original signature for purposes hereof.

8.13 Expenses.  Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, all costs and expenses incurred in connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby will be paid by the party incurring such expenses.

8.14 Headings; Construction.  The headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and will not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. In this Agreement (a) words denoting the singular include the plural and vice versa, (b) “it” or “its” or words denoting any gender include all genders and (c) the word “including” means “including without limitation,” whether or not expressed.

[Signature page follows]

C-8


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Theraclone Voting and Lock-Up Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.

THE COMPANY:

PHARMATHENE, INC.

By:   
Name:
Title:

STOCKHOLDERS:

CLIFFORD J. STOCKS


Name: Clifford J. Stocks

STEVEN GILLIS, PH.D.
 

Name: Steven Gillis, Ph.D.

ARCH V ENTREPRENEURS FUND, L.P.

By:  

Name:
Title:

ARCH VENTURE FUND V, L.P.

By:  

Name:
Title:

HUTTON LIVING TRUST DATED 12/10/96

By:   
Name:
Title:

CANAAN VII L.P.

By:   
Name:
Title:

HEALTHCARE VENTURES, LLC

By:   
Name:
Title:

DR. WENDYE ROBBINS


Name: Dr. Wendye Robbins

[Signature Page to Theraclone Voting and Lock-Up Agreement]

C-9


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

STOCKHOLDERS:

MPM ASSET MANAGEMENT INVESTORS 2003 BVIII LLC

By:   
Name:
Title:

MPM BIOVENTURES III, L.P.

By:   
Name:
Title:

MPM BIOVENTURES GMBH & CO. BETEILIGUNGS KG

By:   
Name:
Title:

MPM BIOVENTURES III PARALLEL FUND, L.P.

By:   
Name:
Title:

MPM BIOVENTURES III-QP, L.P.

By:   
Name:
Title:

[Signature Page to Theraclone Voting and Lock-Up Agreement]

C-10


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SCHEDULE A
 
STOCKHOLDERS

 
NAME AND ADDRESS OF STOCKHOLDERS   THERACLONE SHARESBENEFICIALLY OWNED
Clifford J. Stocks   Theraclone Stock Options to purchase up to 2,816,617 Theraclone Common Shares
Steven Gillis, Ph.D.   Theraclone Stock Options to purchase up to 1,220,000 Theraclone Common Shares
50,000 shares of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
4,045 shares of Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
ARCH V Entrepreneurs Fund, L.P.   185 Theraclone Common Shares
Theraclone Warrants to purchase up to 6,693 Theraclone Common Shares
14,488 shares of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
48,978 shares of Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
Theraclone Warrants to purchase up to 210 shares of Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
ARCH Venture Fund V, L.P.   27,755 Theraclone Common Shares
Theraclone Warrants to purchase up to 993,307 Theraclone Common Shares
2,174,438 shares of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
7,270,533 shares of Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
Theraclone Warrants to purchase up to 30,917 shares of Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
Hutton Living Trust dated 12/10/96   Theraclone Warrants to purchase up to 10,000 Theraclone Common Shares
54,045 shares of Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
Canaan VII L.P.   Theraclone Warrants to purchase up to 990,000 Theraclone Common Shares
7898,517 shares of Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
Theraclone Warrants to purchase up to 25,854 shares of Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
HealthCare Ventures, LLC   Theraclone Warrants to purchase up to 933,333 Theraclone Common Shares
5,241,580 shares of Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
Theraclone Warrants to purchase up to 17,158shares of
Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
Dr. Wendye Robbins   Theraclone Stock Options to purchase up to 121,915 Theraclone Common Shares
MPM Asset Management Investors 2003 BVIII LLC   15,783 Theraclone Common Shares
Theraclone Warrants to purchase up to 6,447 Theraclone Common Shares
8,693 shares of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
55,145 shares of Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
MPM BioVentures III, L.P.   54,813 Theraclone Common Shares
Theraclone Warrants to purchase up to 22,388 Theraclone Common Shares
30,192 shares of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
191,508 shares of Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock

C-11


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
NAME AND ADDRESS OF STOCKHOLDERS   THERACLONE SHARESBENEFICIALLY OWNED
MPM BioVentures GmbH & Co. Beteiligungs KG   68,896 Theraclone Common Shares
Theraclone Warrants to purchase up to 28,140 Theraclone Common Shares
37,947 shares of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
240,711 shares of Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
MPM BioVentures III Parallel Fund, L.P.   68,896 Theraclone Common Shares
Theraclone Warrants to purchase up to 28,140 Theraclone Common Shares
37,947 shares of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
240,711 shares of Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
MPM BioVentures III-QP, L.P.   815,224 Theraclone Common Shares
Theraclone Warrants to purchase up to 332,969 Theraclone Common Shares
449,019 shares of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
2,848,245 shares of Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock

C-12


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SCHEDULE B
 
TERMINATED AGREEMENTS

Fourth Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement between Theraclone Sciences, Inc. and the persons listed on Schedule 1 thereto, dated March 11, 2013
Fourth Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement between Theraclone Sciences, Inc. and individuals and entities listed on Annex 1 thereto, dated March 11, 2013
Management Rights Agreement between Theraclone Sciences, Inc. and ARCH Venture entities, dated February 6, 2006
Management Rights Letter Agreement with Healthcare Ventures VIII, L.P. dated March 16, 2007

C-13


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXHIBIT A
 
FORM OF IRREVOCABLE PROXY

From and after the date hereof and until the Expiration Date (as defined below), the undersigned stockholder (“Stockholder”) of Theraclone Sciences, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Theraclone”), hereby irrevocably (to the full extent permitted by Section 212 of the Delaware General Corporation Law) grants to, and appoints, PharmAthene, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and any designee of the Company, and each of them individually, as the sole and exclusive attorney and proxy of the undersigned, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, to vote the Subject Shares (as defined in the Voting Agreement, as defined below) of the Stockholder, or grant a consent or approval in respect of the Subject Shares of the Stockholder, in a manner consistent with Section 2.2 of the Voting Agreement. Upon the undersigned’s execution of this Proxy, any and all prior proxies given by the undersigned with respect to any Subject Shares relating to the voting rights expressly provided herein are hereby revoked and the undersigned agrees not to grant any subsequent proxies with respect to the Subject Shares relating to such voting rights at any time prior to the Expiration Date.

This Proxy is irrevocable, is coupled with an interest and is granted pursuant to that certain Theraclone Voting and Lock-Up Agreement (as amended from time to time, the “Voting Agreement”) of even date herewith, by and among the Company and Stockholder, and is granted in consideration of the Company entering into the Merger Agreement (as defined in the Voting Agreement). As used herein, the term “Expiration Date,” and all capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined, will have the meanings set forth in the Voting Agreement. The Stockholder agrees that this proxy will be irrevocable until the Expiration Date and is coupled with an interest sufficient at law to support an irrevocable proxy and given to the Company as an inducement to enter into the Merger Agreement and, to the extent permitted under applicable law, will be valid and binding on any person to whom Stockholder may transfer any of his, her or its Subject Shares in breach of the Voting Agreement. The Stockholder hereby ratifies and confirms all that such irrevocable proxy may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

The attorneys and proxies named above, and each of them, are hereby authorized and empowered by the undersigned, at any time prior to the Expiration Date, to act as the undersigned’s attorney and proxy to vote the Subject Shares, and to exercise all voting and other rights of the undersigned with respect to the Subject Shares (including, without limitation, the power to execute and deliver written consents pursuant to Section 228 of the Delaware General Corporation Law), at every annual, special or adjourned meeting of the stockholders of the Company and in every written consent in lieu of such meeting in a manner consistent with Section 2.2 of the Voting Agreement.

This Proxy will be binding upon the heirs, estate, executors, personal representatives, successors and assigns of Stockholder (including any transferee of any of the Subject Shares), and all authority herein conferred or agreed to be conferred will survive the death or incapacity of the Stockholder.

If any provision of this Proxy or any part of any such provision is held under any circumstances to be invalid or unenforceable in any jurisdiction, then (a) such provision or part thereof will, with respect to such circumstances and in such jurisdiction, be deemed amended to conform to applicable laws so as to be valid and enforceable to the fullest possible extent, (b) the invalidity or unenforceability of such provision or part thereof under such circumstances and in such jurisdiction will not affect the validity or enforceability of such provision or part thereof under any other circumstances or in any other jurisdiction, and (c) the invalidity or unenforceability of such provision or part thereof will not affect the validity or enforceability of the remainder of such provision or the validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Proxy. Each provision of this Proxy is separable from every other provision of this Proxy, and each part of each provision of this Proxy is separable from every other part of such provision.

Dated:

  
Name:
Title:

C-14


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

STOCKHOLDER AGREEMENT & WRITTEN CONSENT OF
THE STOCKHOLEDRS — SPOUSAL CONSENT

I ____________________, spouse of ____________________, have read and approve the foregoing Theraclone Voting and Lock-Up Agreement (the “Agreement”). In consideration of the terms and conditions as set forth in the Agreement, I hereby appoint my spouse as my attorney in fact with respect to the exercise of any rights and obligations under the Agreement, and agree to be bound by the provisions of the Agreement insofar as I may have any rights or obligations in the Agreement under the community property laws of the State of Washington or similar laws relating to marital or community property in effect in the state of our residence as of the date of the Agreement.

Date: ________________________________________

Signature of Spouse: ____________________________

Printed Name of Spouse: _________________________

C-15


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ANNEX D

FORM OF BOARD COMPOSITION AGREEMENT

THIS BOARD COMPOSITION AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of this [•] day of [•], 2013, by and among PharmAthene, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and each holder of the Company’s Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per share (“Common Stock”), listed on Schedule A hereto (the “Stockholders”).

RECITALS

A. The Company, Taurus Merger Sub, Inc. (“Merger Sub”), Theraclone Sciences, Inc. (“Theraclone”) and Steven Gillis, Ph.D., solely in its capacity as the representative of the Theraclone Stockholders are parties to that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 31, 2013 (the “Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which Merger Sub is to be merged with and into Theraclone, with Theraclone being the surviving entity of such merger and thereby becoming a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Merger”); and

B. In connection with the Merger Agreement and as a condition to the consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Merger, the Stockholders and the Company desire to enter into this Agreement to, among other things, obligate the Stockholders to vote their respective shares of Common Stock for the election of the members of the board of directors of the Company (the “Board”) in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

1. Voting Provisions Regarding Board of Directors.

1.1 Size of the Board.  Each Stockholder agrees to vote, or cause to be voted, all Shares (as defined below) owned by such Stockholder, or over which such Stockholder has voting control, from time to time and at all times, in whatever manner as shall be necessary to ensure that the size of the Board shall be set and remain at nine (9) directors. For purposes of this Agreement, the term “Shares” shall mean and include any securities of the Company the holders of which are entitled to vote for members of the Board, including without limitation, all shares of Common Stock, by whatever name called, whether now owned or subsequently acquired by a Stockholder, however acquired, whether through stock splits, stock dividends, reclassifications, recapitalizations, similar events or otherwise.

1.2 Board Composition.  Each Stockholder agrees to vote, or cause to be voted, all Shares owned by such Stockholder, or over which such Stockholder has voting control, from time to time and at all relevant times, in whatever manner as shall be necessary to ensure that at each annual or special meeting of stockholders of the Company at which an election of directors is held or pursuant to any written consent of the stockholders of the Company, as follows:

(a) effective as of the Effective Time, to cause the board of directors of the Company to consist of nine (9) members, five (5) of whom shall be current directors of the Company (each such person, a “PharmAthene Board Designee”), three (3) of whom shall be the persons identified in Section 6.13 of the Theraclone Disclosure Schedule (each such person, a “Theraclone Board Designee”) and the remaining seat shall be vacant;

(b) to cause the initial vacancy on the Company’s board of directors to be filled at Closing or as soon as possible thereafter by a nominee (the “Fourth Theraclone Director”) approved by a majority of the then-serving Theraclone Board Designees acting in their individual capacities and not in their capacities as directors;

(c) to cause one of the PharmAthene Board Designees (the “Resigning PharmAthene Board Designee”) to resign upon the earlier of (i) such time as there has been a full settlement or a final, non-appealable resolution of that certain litigation matter between the Company and SIGA Technologies, Inc. (the “Siga Determination Date”) and (ii) the second anniversary of the Closing, but in no event prior to the first anniversary of the Closing (the “Resigning PharmAthene Board Designee Resignation Date”);

D-1


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(d) to cause all vacancies on the Company’s board of directors created by the cessation of service of any Theraclone Board Designee to be filled by a nominee approved by the remaining Theraclone Board Designees;

(e) to cause all vacancies on the Company’s board of directors created by the cessation of service of any PharmAthene Board Designee to be filled by a nominee approved by the remaining PharmAthene Board Designees;

(f) to cause fifty percent (50%) of the members of all committees of the PharmAthene Board of Directors to be filled by Theraclone Board Designees and where a committee of the PharmAthene Board of Directors is comprised of an odd number of directors, the last director shall be mutually agreed to by the PharmAthene Board Designees and Theraclone Board Designees that are members of such committee;

(g) to obtain the resignations, or to cause the removal without cause, of the directors identified on Section 6.13 of the PharmAthene Disclosure Schedule as of the Closing Date;

(h) to obtain the resignation of the Resigning PharmAthene Board Designee on or before the Resigning PharmAthene Board Designee Resignation Date.

The PharmAthene Board Designees, collectively with the Theraclone Board Designees, may each be referred to as a “Designee,” and, collectively, as the “Designees.”

The Resigning PharmAthene Board Designee shall be such person as may be determined by a majority of the PharmAthene Board Designees acting in their individual capacities and not in their capacities as directors.

1.3 Removal and Replacement of Board Members.  Each Stockholder also agrees to vote, or cause to be voted, all Shares owned by such Stockholder, or over which such Stockholder has voting control, from time to time and at all times, in whatever manner as shall be necessary to ensure that:

(a) no PharmAthene Designee elected as a director pursuant to this Agreement may be removed as a director unless such removal is directed or approved by the remaining PharmAthene Designees;

(b) no Theraclone Designee elected as a director pursuant to this Agreement may be removed as a director unless such removal is directed or approved by the remaining Theraclone Designees; and

(c) any vacancies on the Board created by the resignation, removal or death of (i) a PharmAthene Designee shall be filled by the person designated by the remaining PharmAthene Designees, and (ii) a Theraclone Designee shall be filled by the person designated by the remaining Theraclone Designees (and the corresponding definition of “PharmAthene Designee” or “Theraclone Designee” shall be deemed to include such designated replacement director(s), as applicable).

All Stockholders agree to execute any written consents required to perform the obligations of this Agreement, and the Company agrees at the request of any Stockholder to call a special meeting of stockholders of the Company for the purpose of electing directors.

1.4 Proxy Solicitation.  If at any time the stockholders of the Company are entitled to vote on the composition of the Board, whether at an annual or special meeting of the stockholders of the Company or pursuant to a written consent, the proposed list of directors then to be voted on or consented to does not include all the PharmAthene Designees and the Theraclone Designees, then the Stockholders agree to take all reasonable action to cause a proposal for the election of a Board comprising the PharmAthene Designees and the Theraclone Designees to be submitted to a vote of the holders of the Company’s issued and outstanding voting stock, including preparing and filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission a proxy statement and distributing the same to the stockholders of the Company and engaging a proxy solicitor to advise on and assist with the solicitation of proxies.

D-2


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.5 No Liability for Designation or Election of Directors.

(a) The parties acknowledge and agree that any direction or approval given hereunder by any PharmAthene Designee or Theraclone Designee, including the designation of a person for election as a director of the Company, shall be given solely in such person’s individual capacity, and not in such person’s capacity as a director, and, notwithstanding any conflict of interest, no PharmAthene Designee or Theraclone Designee, nor any of their respective Affiliates (as defined below), shall have any liability as a result of designating a person for election as a director for any act or omission by such designated person in his or her capacity as a director of the Company, nor shall any Stockholder have any liability as a result of voting for any such designee in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to require any person to vote in any particular manner in his or her capacity as a member of the Board.

(b) For purposes of this Agreement, an individual, firm, corporation, partnership, association, limited liability company, trust or any other entity (collectively, a “Person”) shall be deemed an “Affiliate” of another Person who, directly or indirectly, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such Person, including, without limitation, any general partner, managing member, officer or director of such Person or any venture capital fund now or hereafter existing that is controlled by one or more general partners or managing members of, or shares the same management company with, such Person.

2. Remedies.

2.1 Covenants of the Company.  The Company agrees to use its best efforts, within the requirements of applicable law, to ensure that the rights granted under this Agreement are effective and that the parties enjoy the benefits of this Agreement. Such actions include, without limitation, the use of the Company’s best efforts to cause the nomination and election of the directors as provided in this Agreement.

2.2 Irrevocable Proxy and Power of Attorney.  Each party to this Agreement hereby constitutes and appoints as the proxies of the party and hereby grants a power of attorney to the President of the Company, with full power of substitution, with respect to the matters set forth herein, including without limitation, election of the Designees as members of the Board in accordance with Section 1 hereto, and hereby authorizes such person to represent and to vote, if and only if the party (i) fails to vote or (ii) attempts to vote (whether by proxy, in person or by written consent) in a manner that is inconsistent with the terms of this Agreement, all of such party’s Shares in favor of the election of the Designees. Each of the proxy and power of attorney granted pursuant to the immediately preceding sentence is given in consideration of the agreements and covenants of the Company and the parties in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and, as such, each is coupled with an interest and shall be irrevocable unless and until this Agreement terminates or expires pursuant to Section 3 hereof. Each party hereto hereby revokes any and all previous proxies or powers of attorney with respect to the Shares and shall not hereafter, unless and until this Agreement terminates or expires pursuant to Section 3 hereof, purport to grant any other proxy or power of attorney with respect to any of the Shares, deposit any of the Shares into a voting trust or enter into any agreement (other than this Agreement), arrangement or understanding with any person, directly or indirectly, to vote, grant any proxy or give instructions with respect to the voting of any of the Shares, in each case, with respect to any of the matters set forth herein.

2.3 Specific Enforcement.  Each party acknowledges and agrees that each other party hereto will be irreparably damaged in the event any of the provisions of this Agreement are not performed by the parties in accordance with their specific terms or are otherwise breached. Accordingly, it is agreed that each of the Company and the Stockholders shall be entitled to an injunction to prevent breaches of this Agreement, and to specific enforcement of this Agreement and its terms and provisions in any action instituted in any court of the United States or any state having subject matter jurisdiction.

2.4 Remedies Cumulative.  All remedies, either under this Agreement or by law or otherwise afforded to any party, shall be cumulative and not alternative.

D-3


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

3. Term.  This Agreement shall be effective as of the date hereof and shall continue in effect until and shall terminate upon the earliest to occur of (i) the fifth (5th) anniversary of the date hereof and (ii) the Siga Determination Date, but not sooner than one year from the Closing.

4. Sale of Securities.  Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to affect the right of any party hereto to sell, transfer, dispose of, or otherwise deal in the Shares, provided that (a) in the case of any transfer to an Affiliate, the transferor shall take such steps as may be appropriate to cause such transferee to be bound by the terms hereof, and (b) any transfer to a non-Affiliate shall be free of this Agreement.

5. Miscellaneous.

5.1 Successors and Assigns.  The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. Nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended to confer upon any person or entity other than the parties hereto or their respective successors and assigns any rights, remedies, obligations, or liabilities under or by reason of this Agreement, except as expressly provided herein.

5.2 Governing Law.  This Agreement shall be governed by, construed and enforced in accordance with, the internal law of the State of Delaware.

5.3 Definitions. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meaning as in the Merger Agreement.

5.4 Counterparts.  This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original, but all of which, taken together, will constitute one and the same instrument. A facsimile or electronic copy of a party’s signature printed by a receiving facsimile machine or printer (including signatures in Adobe PDF or similar format) shall be deemed an original signature for purposes hereof.

5.5 Titles and Subtitles.  The titles and subtitles used in this Agreement are used for convenience only and are not to be considered in construing or interpreting this Agreement.

5.6 Notices.  All notices and other communications given or made pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed effectively given upon the earlier of actual receipt of: (a) personal delivery to the party to be notified; (b) when sent, if sent by electronic mail or facsimile during normal business hours of the recipient, and if not sent during normal business hours, then on the recipient’s next business day; (c) five (5) days after having been sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid; or (d) one (1) business day after the business day of deposit with a nationally recognized overnight courier, freight prepaid, specifying next business day delivery, with written verification of receipt. All communications shall be sent to the Stockholders at their respective addresses as set forth on Schedule A hereto, or to such email address, facsimile number or address as subsequently modified by written notice given in accordance with this Subsection 5.6. All communications shall be sent to the Company at: One Park Place, Suite # 450 Annapolis, MD 21401, Attention: General Counsel, with copies to Dentons US LLP, 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020-1089, Attention: Jeffrey A. Baumel, Esq. and Stephan J. Mallenbaum, Esq.

5.7 Consent Required to Amend, Terminate or Waive.  This Agreement may be amended or terminated and the observance of any term hereof may be waived (either generally or in a particular instance and either retroactively or prospectively) only by a written instrument executed by the Company and the Stockholders holding at least a majority of the Common Stock then held by Stockholders.

5.8 Delays or Omissions.  No delay or omission to exercise any right, power or remedy accruing to any party under this Agreement, upon any breach or default of any other party under this Agreement, shall impair any such right, power or remedy of such non-breaching or non-defaulting party nor shall it be construed to be a waiver of any such breach or default, or an acquiescence therein, or of or in any similar breach or default thereafter occurring; nor shall any waiver of any single breach or default be deemed a waiver of any other breach or default previously or thereafter occurring. Any waiver, permit, consent or approval of any kind or character on the part of any party of any breach or default under this Agreement, or any waiver on the part of any party of any provisions or conditions of this Agreement, must be in

D-4


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

writing and shall be effective only to the extent specifically set forth in such writing. All remedies, either under this Agreement or by law or otherwise afforded to any party, shall be cumulative and not alternative.

5.9 Severability.  The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision hereof shall in no way affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision.

5.10 Entire Agreement.  This Agreement (including the Schedule hereto) constitutes the full and entire understanding and agreement among the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and any other written or oral agreement relating to the subject matter hereof existing between or among the parties is expressly canceled.

5.11 Further Assurances.  At any time or from time to time after the date hereof, the parties agree to cooperate with each other, and at the request of any other party, to execute and deliver any further instruments or documents and to take all such further action as the other party may reasonably request in order to evidence or effectuate the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and to otherwise carry out the intent of the parties hereunder.

5.12 Dispute Resolution.  The parties (a) hereby irrevocably and unconditionally submit to the jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware or if (but only if) that court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware for the purpose of any suit, action or other proceeding arising out of or based upon this Agreement, (b) agree not to commence any suit, action or other proceeding arising out of or based upon this Agreement except in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware or if (but only if) that court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, and (c) hereby waive, and agree not to assert, by way of motion, as a defense, or otherwise, in any such suit, action or proceeding, any claim that it is not subject personally to the jurisdiction of the above-named courts, that its property is exempt or immune from attachment or execution, that the suit, action or proceeding is brought in an inconvenient forum, that the venue of the suit, action or proceeding is improper or that this Agreement or the subject matter hereof may not be enforced in or by such court.

EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO IRREVOCABLY WAIVES ANY AND ALL RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY LEGAL PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT.

[Signature Page Follows]

D-5


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Board Composition Agreement as of the date first written above.

PHARMATHENE, INC.

By:   
Name: Eric I. Richman
Title: Chief Executive Officer

STOCKHOLDERS:

  
John M. Gill

  
Brian A. Markison

  
Joel McCleary

  
Eric I. Richman

  
Jeffrey W. Runge, M.D.

  
Mitchel Sayare, Ph.D.

  
Derace L. Schaffer, M.D.

  
Steven St. Peter, M.D.

  
Linda L. Chang

  
Francesca Cook

  
Wayne Morges, Ph.D.

  
Jordan Karp, J.D.

CLIFFORD J. STOCKS

  
Name: Clifford J. Stocks

STEVEN GILLIS, PH.D.

  
Name: Steven Gillis, Ph.D.

Signature Page to Board Composition Agreement

D-6


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ARCH V ENTREPRENEURS FUND, L.P.

By:   
Name:
Title:

ARCH VENTURE FUND V, L.P.

By:   
Name:
Title:

HUTTON LIVING TRUST DATED 12/10/96

By:   
Name:
Title:

CANAAN VII L.P.

By:   
Name:
Title:

HEALTHCARE VENTURES, LLC

By:   
Name:
Title:

DR. WENDYE ROBBINS

  
Name: Dr. Wendye Robbins

MPM ASSET MANAGEMENT INVESTORS 2003 BVIII LLC

By:   
Name:
Title:

MPM BIOVENTURES III, L.P.

By:   
Name:
Title:

MPM BIOVENTURES GMBH & CO. BETEILIGUNGS KG

By:   
Name:
Title:

Signature Page to Board Composition Agreement

D-7


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MPM BIOVENTURES III PARALLEL FUND, L.P.

By:   
Name:
Title:

MPM BIOVENTURES III-QP, L.P.

By:   
Name:
Title:

Signature Page to Board Composition Agreement

D-8


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SCHEDULE A

STOCKHOLDERS

 
Name and Address
  Number of Shares Held

D-9


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ANNEX E

FORM OF POST-CLOSING LOCK-UP AGREEMENT

[Address]

Ladies and Gentlemen:

This Post-Closing Lock-Up Agreement (this “Agreement”) is being delivered pursuant to that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 31, 2013, by and among PharmAthene, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“PharmAthene”), Taurus Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of PharmAthene (“Merger Sub”) and Theraclone Sciences, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Theraclone”), and Steven Gillis, Ph.D., solely in its capacity as the representative of the Theraclone Securityholders (the “Merger Agreement”). Capitalized terms used in this Agreement and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Merger Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, the undersigned (“Stockholder”) is agreeing that all shares of PharmAthene Common Stock issued to Stockholder as Merger Consideration in connection with the Merger, including shares held as of the Closing Date, and shares that may be held in escrow (whether or not released from escrow) and including any shares issued in connection with any stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, reorganization, or the like (collectively, the “Lock-Up Shares”), shall be subject to the restrictions and obligations as set forth in this Agreement.

As a material inducement to PharmAthene’s willingness to enter into the Merger Agreement and for other good and valuable consideration, receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned agrees that, without the prior written consent of PharmAthene, the undersigned will not, directly or indirectly offer, sell, pledge, contract to sell (including any short sale), grant any option to purchase or otherwise dispose of any Lock-Up Shares or enter into any Hedging Transaction (as defined below) relating to the Lock-Up Shares (each of the foregoing referred to as a “Disposition”) for a period from the date hereof until such restrictions and obligations have lapsed, as provided in the following sentence. The restrictions and obligations set forth in this Agreement shall lapse and be of no further force or effect as to:

(i) thirty-three percent (33%) of the Lock-Up Shares (rounded up to the nearest whole share) on the six month anniversary of the Closing Date,

(ii) thirty-three percent (33%) of the Lock-Up Shares (rounded up to the nearest whole share) on the nine month anniversary of the Closing Date, and

(iii) the balance of the Lock-Up Shares (rounded up to the nearest whole share) on the first anniversary of the Closing Date (together with the dates referenced in subsection (i)-(ii) above, the “Lapse Dates”).

The foregoing restrictions are expressly intended to preclude the undersigned from engaging in any Hedging Transaction or other transaction which is designed to or reasonably expected to lead to or result in a Disposition even if the securities would be disposed of by someone other than the undersigned. “Hedging Transaction” means any short sale (whether or not against the box) or any purchase, sale or grant of any right (including, without limitation, any put or call option) with respect to any security (other than a broad-based market basket or index) that includes, relates to or derives any significant part of its value from the Lock-Up Shares.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the undersigned may transfer any or all of the Lock-Up Shares by (i) gift or to any member of the immediate family of the undersigned or to any trust or partnership for the direct or indirect benefit of the undersigned or the immediate family of the undersigned (including by will or intestate succession), provided that the transferee agrees to be bound in writing by the restrictions set forth herein, and provided further that any such transfer shall not involve a disposition for value, (ii) to any limited partners, members or stockholders of the undersigned, (iii) in transactions relating to shares of PharmAthene Common Stock or other securities convertible or exercisable into shares of PharmAthene Common Stock acquired in open market transactions or pursuant to employee benefit plans or incentive compensation plans after the execution of this Agreement (including, without limitation, the sale of shares in a “same day sale” or

E-1


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

“net exercise” in exercising an option grant or the sale of shares in order to pay withholding taxes upon the vesting of restricted stock units); (iv) in transfers of shares of PharmAthene Common Stock, or any security convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for Common Stock, to the Company pursuant to agreements under which the Company has the option to repurchase such shares or a right of first refusal with respect to transfers of such shares; and (v) pursuant to a trading plan pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act for the transfer of shares of Common Stock; provided, however, that in any such case it shall be a condition to the transfer pursuant to clauses (i) and (ii) above, that the transferee execute an agreement stating that the transferee is receiving and holding the Lock-Up Shares subject to the provisions of this Agreement, and there shall be no further transfer of such Lock-Up Shares except in accordance with this Agreement.

Without limiting the restrictions or obligations herein, any Disposition by the undersigned shall remain at all times subject to applicable securities laws.

The undersigned agrees that PharmAthene may place an appropriate restrictive legend on the stock certificates representing the Lock-Up Shares issued to the undersigned to indicate that such shares are subject to the terms of this Agreement. PharmAthene agrees that it will (or will instruct the transfer agent for PharmAthene to) promptly remove such restrictive legend (a) upon the earlier to occur of (i) the applicable Lapse Date (only with respect to the stock certificates representing such Lock-Up Shares that are no longer subject to the restrictions and obligations of this Agreement) or (ii) the termination of this Agreement pursuant to its terms (with respect to stock certificates representing all of the Lock-Up Shares) or (b) as otherwise expressly contemplated by this Agreement. The undersigned agrees that PharmAthene may, and the undersigned will, with respect to any Lock-Up Shares, cause the transfer agent for PharmAthene to note stop transfer instructions with respect to the Lock-Up Shares on the transfer books and records of PharmAthene.

The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the undersigned has full power and authority to enter into this Agreement. All authority herein conferred or agreed to be conferred shall survive the death or incapacity of the undersigned and any obligations of the undersigned shall be binding upon the heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of the undersigned.

Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Stockholder nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby will directly or indirectly (whether with notice or lapse of time or both) (i) conflict with, result in any violation of or constitute a default by the Stockholder under any mortgage, bond, indenture, agreement, instrument or obligation to which the Stockholder is a party or by which it or any of the Lock-Up Shares are bound, (ii) violate any applicable Law to which the Stockholder, or any of the Lock-Up Shares, may be subject, or (iii) result in the imposition or creation of any Lien upon or with respect to any of the Lock-Up Shares; except, in each case, for conflicts, violations, defaults or Liens that would not individually or in the aggregate be reasonably expected to prevent or materially impair or delay the performance by such Stockholder of its obligations hereunder.

If Stockholder is married, he or she shall cause his or her spouse to execute and deliver to PharmAthene a Spousal Consent in the form of that attached hereto, and should Stockholder hereafter become married, Stockholder shall promptly cause his or her spouse to execute and deliver to the Company a Spousal Consent in such form.

This Agreement shall terminate immediately and be of no further force or effect upon the earliest to occur of:

(a) immediately prior to the consummation of (i) any acquisition or purchase from PharmAthene by any person (as defined in the Merger Agreement) or group (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Group”)) of a 20% or more interest in the total outstanding voting securities of PharmAthene (other than as a result of the Merger), (ii) any merger, consolidation, business combination, share exchange or similar transaction involving PharmAthene pursuant to which the stockholders of PharmAthene immediately preceding such transaction will hold securities representing less than 80% of the total outstanding voting power of the surviving or resulting entity of such transaction (or PharmAthene entity of such surviving or resulting entity) (other than as a result of the Merger), (iii) any sale, lease, exchange, transfer, exclusive license or disposition of assets (including capital stock or other ownership interests in subsidiaries) representing

E-2


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

20% or more of the aggregate fair market value of the consolidated assets of PharmAthene and its subsidiaries taken as a whole, (iv) any spin-off, spin-out, split-up, carve-out or similar event pursuant to which assets representing 20% or more of either the aggregate fair market value of the assets of PharmAthene as of the Closing Date or the business of the PharmAthene as of the Closing Date will be transferred in one or more transactions or (v) the public announcement of a third party regarding a “bear hug” letter sent to PharmAthene or the public announcement of a third party regarding a tender offer for shares of PharmAthene Common Stock;
(b) immediately following the launch of any tender offer or exchange offer that if consummated would result in any person (as defined in the Merger Agreement) or Group beneficially owning securities representing 20% or more of the total outstanding voting power of PharmAthene; or
(c) (i) the filing of a petition by or against PharmAthene under any chapter of the Bankruptcy Reform Act, Title 11 of the United States Code, as amended or recodified from time to time, or under any similar law relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or other relief for debtors, (ii) appointment of a receiver, trustee, custodian or liquidator of or for all or any part of the assets or property of PharmAthene, (iii) the insolvency of PharmAthene, or (iv) the making of a general assignment for the benefit of creditors by PharmAthene.

Very truly yours,

Dated: _____ ____, 2013


 
Print Name: 
 
Acknowledged and Agreed:
 
PHARMATHENE, INC.
  

 
Print Name: 

E-3


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

STOCKHOLDER AGREEMENT & WRITTEN CONSENT OF
THE STOCKHOLDERS — SPOUSAL CONSENT

I __________________, spouse of _______________, have read and approve the foregoing Post-Closing Lock-up Agreement (the “Agreement”). In consideration of the terms and conditions as set forth in the Agreement, I hereby appoint my spouse as my attorney in fact with respect to the exercise of any rights and obligations under the Agreement, and agree to be bound by the provisions of the Agreement insofar as I may have any rights or obligations in the Agreement under the community property laws of the State of Washington or similar laws relating to marital or community property in effect in the state of our residence as of the date of the Agreement.

Date: ________________________________________

Signature of Spouse: ____________________________

Printed Name of Spouse: _________________________

E-4


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ANNEX FA

OPINION OF LEERINK SWANN LLC

The Board of Directors
PharmAthene, Inc.
One Park Place
Suite #450
Annapolis, MD 21401

Members of the Board of Directors:

We understand that PharmAthene, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“PharmAthene” or the “Company”), Theraclone Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a direct, wholly owned Subsidiary of PharmAthene (“Merger Sub”), Theraclone Sciences, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Theraclone” or the “Target”), and Steven Gillis, Ph.D., solely in his capacity as the representative of the Theraclone Securityholders (the “Securityholders’ Representative”) pursuant to that certain Securityholders’ Representative Agreement, to be dated as of the date hereof (the “Securityholders’ Representative Agreement”) are proposing to enter into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Agreement”), pursuant to which Merger Sub will be merged with and into Theraclone, with Theraclone as the surviving corporation (the “Merger”), and as a result of the Merger, Theraclone will become a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of PharmAthene, and each common share, par value $0.001, of Theraclone (the “Theraclone Common Shares,” and each, a “Theraclone Common Share”) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Merger shall be converted into and shall thereafter represent the right to receive a number of shares (the “Exchange Ratio”) of common stock, $.0001 par value per share (the “PharmAthene Stock”), of PharmAthene equal to the quotient obtained from dividing the Fully Diluted Equity of PharmAthene immediately prior to the Effective Time by the Fully Diluted Equity of Theraclone immediately prior to the Effective Time (the “Merger Consideration”). The terms and conditions of the proposed Merger are set out more fully in the Agreement. Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.

You have requested our opinion (our “Opinion”) as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of PharmAthene Stock (other than Theraclone and its affiliates) of the Exchange Ratio. This letter and our Opinion have been authorized by our Fairness Opinion Review Committee.

We have been engaged by the Company to act as financial advisor to the Company in connection with the proposed Merger and we will receive a fee from the Company for providing such services, the principal portion of which is contingent upon consummation of the Merger. In addition, the Company has agreed to reimburse our expenses arising, and indemnify us against certain liabilities that may arise, out of our engagement. We are a full-service securities firm engaged in securities trading and brokerage activities as well as investment banking and financial advisory services. In the ordinary course of business, we and our affiliates may, in the future, provide commercial and investment banking services to the Company, the Target or their respective affiliates and would expect to receive customary fees for the rendering of such services. In the ordinary course of our trading and brokerage activities, we or our affiliates have in the past and may in the future hold positions, for our own account or the accounts of our customers, in equity, debt or other securities of the Company, the Target or their respective affiliates.

Consistent with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, Leerink Swann has adopted policies and procedures to establish and maintain the independence of Leerink Swann’s research departments and personnel. As a result, Leerink Swann’s research analysts may hold views, make statements or investment recommendations and/or publish research reports with respect to the Company and the proposed Merger and other participants in the Merger that differ from the views of Leerink Swann’s investment banking personnel.

In connection with our Opinion, we have reviewed and considered such financial and other information as we have deemed relevant, including, among other things:

(i) a draft of the Agreement, dated July 30, 2013;
(ii) certain financial and other business information of the Company and the Target furnished to us by the managements of the Company and the Target, respectively;

FA-1


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(iii) published estimates of independent research analysts with respect to the future financial performance and price targets of the Company;
(iv) certain periodic reports and other publicly available information regarding the Company;
(v) comparisons of certain publicly available financial data of companies whose securities are traded in the public markets and that we deemed relevant to similar data for the Company and Theraclone;
(vi) certain estimates as to the amount and timing of cost savings and related expenses anticipated by the management of the Company to result from the Merger (the “Synergies”); and
(vii) such other information, financial studies, analyses and investigations and such other factors that we deemed relevant for the purposes of this letter and our Opinion.

In addition, we held discussions with members of senior management and representatives of the Company and Theraclone concerning the matters described in clauses (ii) and (vi) above, as well as the businesses and prospects of the Company and Theraclone.

In conducting our review and analysis and in arriving at our Opinion, we have, with your consent, assumed and relied, without independent investigation, upon the accuracy and completeness of all financial and other information provided to us, or publicly available. We have not undertaken any responsibility for independently verifying, and did not independently verify, the accuracy, completeness or reasonableness of any such information. With respect to financial forecasts for the Company and Theraclone and the estimated Synergies that were provided to us and that we have reviewed, we have been advised, and we have assumed, with your consent, that such forecasts and estimated Synergies have been reasonably prepared in good faith on the basis of reasonable assumptions and reflect the best currently available estimates and judgments of the managements of the Company and Theraclone, respectively, as to the future financial condition and performance of the Company and Theraclone and the synergies estimated to be derived from the Merger. We express no opinion with respect to such forecasts or estimates or the assumptions upon which they are based. We have assumed, with your consent, that the future revenues of the Company which may result from the subject matter of its pending litigation with SIGA Technologies, Inc. will be equal to the damages awarded by the Delaware Chancery Court in its judgment dated May 31, 2012 (which was subsequently remanded by the Delaware Supreme Court on May 24, 2013 for reconsideration). We express no opinion with respect to the amount of such future revenues or the assumptions upon which such revenues are based.

We have not made or obtained any independent evaluations, valuations or appraisals of the assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of the Company or Theraclone, nor have we been furnished with such materials. We have made no independent investigation of any legal, accounting or tax matters relating to the Company or Theraclone, and have assumed the correctness of all legal, accounting and tax advice given to the Company and Theraclone.

For purposes of rendering our Opinion, we have assumed in all respects material to our analysis, that the consideration to be received in the Merger was determined through arm’s-length negotiations between the appropriate parties, that the representations and warranties of each party contained in the Agreement are true and correct, that each party will perform all of the covenants and agreements required to be performed by it under the Agreement without material alteration or waiver thereof, that all governmental, regulatory or other consents and approvals necessary for the consummation of the Merger will be obtained without any adverse effect on the expected benefits of the Merger in any way meaningful to our analysis and that all conditions to the consummation of the proposed Merger will be satisfied without waiver thereof or material alteration to the terms of the proposed Merger. We have assumed, with your consent, that the Fully Diluted Equity of PharmAthene as of the date hereof is 59,221,000 shares of PharmAthene Stock and the Fully Diluted Equity of Theraclone as of the date hereof is 51,687,000 shares of Theraclone Common Stock, resulting in an Exchange Ratio of approximately 1.1458 shares of PharmAthene Stock for each share of Theraclone Common Stock, and that there will be no change (other than a de minimis change) in the Fully Diluted Equity of PharmAthene or Theraclone after the date hereof. We have also assumed, with your consent, that the final form of the Agreement will be substantially the same as the last draft reviewed by us. In addition, we have assumed, with your consent, that the historical financial statements of the Company and Theraclone reviewed by us have been prepared and fairly presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles consistently

FA-2


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

applied. We have further assumed, with your consent, that as of the date hereof, there has been no material adverse change in the Company’s or the Target’s assets, financial condition, results of operations, business or prospects since the date of the last audited financial statements made available to us which change has not been disclosed to us prior to the date hereof.

We do not express any opinion as to (i) the value of any employee agreement or other arrangement entered into in connection with the proposed Merger, or (ii) any tax or other consequences that might result from the proposed Merger. Furthermore, we express no opinion with respect to the amount or nature of compensation to any officer, director or employee of any party to the Merger, or any class of such persons, relative to the Merger Consideration or with respect to the fairness of any such compensation.

Our Opinion relates solely to the fairness of the Exchange Ratio to the holders of PharmAthene Stock (other than Theraclone and its affiliates), and our Opinion does not address the Company’s underlying business decision to proceed with or effect the Merger or any other term, aspect or implication of the proposed Merger or any other agreement or arrangement entered into in connection with the proposed Merger. We have not been requested to opine as to, and this letter and our Opinion do not in any manner address, the fairness of the Merger or the Exchange Ratio to the holders of any other class of securities or creditors or any other constituency of the Company. We are not expressing any opinion as to the impact of the Merger on the solvency or viability of the Company or Theraclone or the ability of the Company or Theraclone to pay its obligations when they come due. In addition, this letter and our Opinion do not address any legal or accounting matters, as to which we understand that the Company has obtained such advice as it has deemed necessary from qualified professionals. We are not expressing any opinion as to the prices at which shares of the PharmAthene Stock may trade at any time.

Our Opinion is necessarily based upon economic and market conditions and other circumstances as they exist and can be evaluated by us on the date hereof. It should be understood that although subsequent developments may affect our Opinion, we do not have any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm our Opinion and we expressly disclaim any responsibility to do so.

It is understood that this letter and our Opinion are intended for the benefit and use of the Board of Directors of the Company in its consideration of the proposed Merger. This letter and our Opinion do not constitute a recommendation of the Merger to the Board of Directors of the Company nor do they constitute a recommendation to any shareholder of the Company how such shareholder should vote with respect to the Merger or otherwise.

Based upon and subject to the foregoing, including the various assumptions and limitations set forth herein, it is our opinion that, as of the date hereof, the Exchange Ratio is fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of PharmAthene Stock (other than Theraclone and its affiliates).

Very truly yours,

LEERINK SWANN LLC

/s/ Leerink Swann

FA-3


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ANNEX G

SECTION 262 OF THE DELAWARE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW

§262. Appraisal rights.

(a) Any stockholder of a corporation of this State who holds shares of stock on the date of the making of a demand pursuant to subsection (d) of this section with respect to such shares, who continuously holds such shares through the effective date of the merger or consolidation, who has otherwise complied with subsection (d) of this section and who has neither voted in favor of the merger or consolidation nor consented thereto in writing pursuant to §228 of this title shall be entitled to an appraisal by the Court of Chancery of the fair value of the stockholder's shares of stock under the circumstances described in subsections (b) and (c) of this section. As used in this section, the word “stockholder” means a holder of record of stock in a corporation; the words “stock” and “share” mean and include what is ordinarily meant by those words; and the words “depository receipt” mean a receipt or other instrument issued by a depository representing an interest in 1 or more shares, or fractions thereof, solely of stock of a corporation, which stock is deposited with the depository.

(b) Appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of any class or series of stock of a constituent corporation in a merger or consolidation to be effected pursuant to §251 (other than a merger effected pursuant to §251(g) of this title and, subject to paragraph (b)(3) of this section, §251(h) of this title), §252, §254, §255, §256, §257, §258, §263 or §264 of this title:

(1) Provided, however, that, except as expressly provided in §363(b) of this title, no appraisal rights under this section shall be available for the shares of any class or series of stock, which stock, or depository receipts in respect thereof, at the record date fixed to determine the stockholders entitled to receive notice of the meeting of stockholders to act upon the agreement of merger or consolidation, were either: (i) listed on a national securities exchange or (ii) held of record by more than 2,000 holders; and further provided that no appraisal rights shall be available for any shares of stock of the constituent corporation surviving a merger if the merger did not require for its approval the vote of the stockholders of the surviving corporation as provided in §251(f) of this title.

(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (b)(1) of this section, appraisal rights under this section shall be available for the shares of any class or series of stock of a constituent corporation if the holders thereof are required by the terms of an agreement of merger or consolidation pursuant to §§251, 252, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 263 and 264 of this title to accept for such stock anything except:

a. Shares of stock of the corporation surviving or resulting from such merger or consolidation, or depository receipts in respect thereof;

b. Shares of stock of any other corporation, or depository receipts in respect thereof, which shares of stock (or depository receipts in respect thereof) or depository receipts at the effective date of the merger or consolidation will be either listed on a national securities exchange or held of record by more than 2,000 holders;

c. Cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional depository receipts described in the foregoing paragraphs (b)(2)a. and b. of this section; or

d. Any combination of the shares of stock, depository receipts and cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional depository receipts described in the foregoing paragraphs (b)(2)a., b. and c. of this section.

(3) In the event all of the stock of a subsidiary Delaware corporation party to a merger effected under §251(h), §253 or §267 of this title is not owned by the parent immediately prior to the merger, appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of the subsidiary Delaware corporation.

(4) In the event of an amendment to a corporation's certificate of incorporation contemplated by §363(a) of this title, appraisal rights shall be available as contemplated by §363(b) of this title, and the procedures of this section, including those set forth in subsections (d) and (e) of this section, shall apply

G-1


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

as nearly as practicable, with the word “amendment” substituted for the words “merger or consolidation”, and the word “corporation” substituted for the words “constituent corporation” and/or “surviving or resulting corporation”.

(c) Any corporation may provide in its certificate of incorporation that appraisal rights under this section shall be available for the shares of any class or series of its stock as a result of an amendment to its certificate of incorporation, any merger or consolidation in which the corporation is a constituent corporation or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the corporation. If the certificate of incorporation contains such a provision, the procedures of this section, including those set forth in subsections (d) and (e) of this section, shall apply as nearly as is practicable.

(d) Appraisal rights shall be perfected as follows:

(1) If a proposed merger or consolidation for which appraisal rights are provided under this section is to be submitted for approval at a meeting of stockholders, the corporation, not less than 20 days prior to the meeting, shall notify each of its stockholders who was such on the record date for notice of such meeting (or such members who received notice in accordance with §255(c) of this title) with respect to shares for which appraisal rights are available pursuant to subsection (b) or (c) of this section that appraisal rights are available for any or all of the shares of the constituent corporations, and shall include in such notice a copy of this section and, if 1 of the constituent corporations is a nonstock corporation, a copy of §114 of this title. Each stockholder electing to demand the appraisal of such stockholder's shares shall deliver to the corporation, before the taking of the vote on the merger or consolidation, a written demand for appraisal of such stockholder's shares. Such demand will be sufficient if it reasonably informs the corporation of the identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends thereby to demand the appraisal of such stockholder's shares. A proxy or vote against the merger or consolidation shall not constitute such a demand. A stockholder electing to take such action must do so by a separate written demand as herein provided. Within 10 days after the effective date of such merger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation shall notify each stockholder of each constituent corporation who has complied with this subsection and has not voted in favor of or consented to the merger or consolidation of the date that the merger or consolidation has become effective; or

(2) If the merger or consolidation was approved pursuant to §228, §251(h), §253, or §267 of this title, then either a constituent corporation before the effective date of the merger or consolidation or the surviving or resulting corporation within 10 days thereafter shall notify each of the holders of any class or series of stock of such constituent corporation who are entitled to appraisal rights of the approval of the merger or consolidation and that appraisal rights are available for any or all shares of such class or series of stock of such constituent corporation, and shall include in such notice a copy of this section and, if 1 of the constituent corporations is a nonstock corporation, a copy of §114 of this title. Such notice may, and, if given on or after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, shall, also notify such stockholders of the effective date of the merger or consolidation. Any stockholder entitled to appraisal rights may, within 20 days after the date of mailing of such notice or, in the case of a merger approved pursuant to §251(h) of this title, within the later of the consummation of the tender or exchange offer contemplated by §251(h) of this title and 20 days after the date of mailing of such notice, demand in writing from the surviving or resulting corporation the appraisal of such holder's shares. Such demand will be sufficient if it reasonably informs the corporation of the identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends thereby to demand the appraisal of such holder's shares. If such notice did not notify stockholders of the effective date of the merger or consolidation, either (i) each such constituent corporation shall send a second notice before the effective date of the merger or consolidation notifying each of the holders of any class or series of stock of such constituent corporation that are entitled to appraisal rights of the effective date of the merger or consolidation or (ii) the surviving or resulting corporation shall send such a second notice to all such holders on or within 10 days after such effective date; provided, however, that if such second notice is sent more than 20 days following the sending of the first notice or, in the case of a merger approved pursuant to §251(h) of this title, later than the later of the consummation of the tender or exchange offer contemplated by §251(h) of this title and 20 days following the sending of the first notice, such second notice need only be sent to each stockholder who is entitled to appraisal rights and who has demanded appraisal of such holder's shares in accordance with this subsection. An affidavit of the

G-2


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

secretary or assistant secretary or of the transfer agent of the corporation that is required to give either notice that such notice has been given shall, in the absence of fraud, be prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein. For purposes of determining the stockholders entitled to receive either notice, each constituent corporation may fix, in advance, a record date that shall be not more than 10 days prior to the date the notice is given, provided, that if the notice is given on or after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, the record date shall be such effective date. If no record date is fixed and the notice is given prior to the effective date, the record date shall be the close of business on the day next preceding the day on which the notice is given.

(e) Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation or any stockholder who has complied with subsections (a) and (d) of this section hereof and who is otherwise entitled to appraisal rights, may commence an appraisal proceeding by filing a petition in the Court of Chancery demanding a determination of the value of the stock of all such stockholders. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time within 60 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, any stockholder who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding or joined that proceeding as a named party shall have the right to withdraw such stockholder's demand for appraisal and to accept the terms offered upon the merger or consolidation. Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, any stockholder who has complied with the requirements of subsections (a) and (d) of this section hereof, upon written request, shall be entitled to receive from the corporation surviving the merger or resulting from the consolidation a statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares not voted in favor of the merger or consolidation and with respect to which demands for appraisal have been received and the aggregate number of holders of such shares. Such written statement shall be mailed to the stockholder within 10 days after such stockholder's written request for such a statement is received by the surviving or resulting corporation or within 10 days after expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisal under subsection (d) of this section hereof, whichever is later. Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, a person who is the beneficial owner of shares of such stock held either in a voting trust or by a nominee on behalf of such person may, in such person's own name, file a petition or request from the corporation the statement described in this subsection.

(f) Upon the filing of any such petition by a stockholder, service of a copy thereof shall be made upon the surviving or resulting corporation, which shall within 20 days after such service file in the office of the Register in Chancery in which the petition was filed a duly verified list containing the names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded payment for their shares and with whom agreements as to the value of their shares have not been reached by the surviving or resulting corporation. If the petition shall be filed by the surviving or resulting corporation, the petition shall be accompanied by such a duly verified list. The Register in Chancery, if so ordered by the Court, shall give notice of the time and place fixed for the hearing of such petition by registered or certified mail to the surviving or resulting corporation and to the stockholders shown on the list at the addresses therein stated. Such notice shall also be given by 1 or more publications at least 1 week before the day of the hearing, in a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Wilmington, Delaware or such publication as the Court deems advisable. The forms of the notices by mail and by publication shall be approved by the Court, and the costs thereof shall be borne by the surviving or resulting corporation.

(g) At the hearing on such petition, the Court shall determine the stockholders who have complied with this section and who have become entitled to appraisal rights. The Court may require the stockholders who have demanded an appraisal for their shares and who hold stock represented by certificates to submit their certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery for notation thereon of the pendency of the appraisal proceedings; and if any stockholder fails to comply with such direction, the Court may dismiss the proceedings as to such stockholder.

(h) After the Court determines the stockholders entitled to an appraisal, the appraisal proceeding shall be conducted in accordance with the rules of the Court of Chancery, including any rules specifically governing appraisal proceedings. Through such proceeding the Court shall determine the fair value of the shares exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger or consolidation, together with interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount determined to be the fair value. In determining such fair value, the Court shall take into account all relevant factors. Unless the Court in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause shown, interest from the effective date of the merger through the date of payment of

G-3


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the judgment shall be compounded quarterly and shall accrue at 5% over the Federal Reserve discount rate (including any surcharge) as established from time to time during the period between the effective date of the merger and the date of payment of the judgment. Upon application by the surviving or resulting corporation or by any stockholder entitled to participate in the appraisal proceeding, the Court may, in its discretion, proceed to trial upon the appraisal prior to the final determination of the stockholders entitled to an appraisal. Any stockholder whose name appears on the list filed by the surviving or resulting corporation pursuant to subsection (f) of this section and who has submitted such stockholder's certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery, if such is required, may participate fully in all proceedings until it is finally determined that such stockholder is not entitled to appraisal rights under this section.

(i) The Court shall direct the payment of the fair value of the shares, together with interest, if any, by the surviving or resulting corporation to the stockholders entitled thereto. Payment shall be so made to each such stockholder, in the case of holders of uncertificated stock forthwith, and the case of holders of shares represented by certificates upon the surrender to the corporation of the certificates representing such stock. The Court's decree may be enforced as other decrees in the Court of Chancery may be enforced, whether such surviving or resulting corporation be a corporation of this State or of any state.

(j) The costs of the proceeding may be determined by the Court and taxed upon the parties as the Court deems equitable in the circumstances. Upon application of a stockholder, the Court may order all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees and the fees and expenses of experts, to be charged pro rata against the value of all the shares entitled to an appraisal.

(k) From and after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, no stockholder who has demanded appraisal rights as provided in subsection (d) of this section shall be entitled to vote such stock for any purpose or to receive payment of dividends or other distributions on the stock (except dividends or other distributions payable to stockholders of record at a date which is prior to the effective date of the merger or consolidation); provided, however, that if no petition for an appraisal shall be filed within the time provided in subsection (e) of this section, or if such stockholder shall deliver to the surviving or resulting corporation a written withdrawal of such stockholder's demand for an appraisal and an acceptance of the merger or consolidation, either within 60 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation as provided in subsection (e) of this section or thereafter with the written approval of the corporation, then the right of such stockholder to an appraisal shall cease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no appraisal proceeding in the Court of Chancery shall be dismissed as to any stockholder without the approval of the Court, and such approval may be conditioned upon such terms as the Court deems just; provided, however that this provision shall not affect the right of any stockholder who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding or joined that proceeding as a named party to withdraw such stockholder's demand for appraisal and to accept the terms offered upon the merger or consolidation within 60 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, as set forth in subsection (e) of this section.

(l) The shares of the surviving or resulting corporation to which the shares of such objecting stockholders would have been converted had they assented to the merger or consolidation shall have the status of authorized and unissued shares of the surviving or resulting corporation.

G-4


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ANNEX H

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
PHARMATHENE, INC.

(Pursuant to Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware)

IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED THAT:

1. The name of the corporation is PharmAthene, Inc., and the corporation was originally incorporated under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “GCL”) on April 25, 2005 under the name Healthcare Acquisition Corp.

2. The corporation hereby further amends its Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation as follows:

The first paragraph of Article FOURTH is hereby amended to increase the total number of shares of capital stock and the total number of shares of Common Stock which the Corporation shall have the authority to issue.

Article FOURTH of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, shall read in its entirety as follows:

“FOURTH:  The total number of shares of all classes of capital stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is 176,000,000 of which 175,000,000 shares shall be Common Stock of the par value of $0.0001 per share and 1,000,000 shares shall be Preferred Stock of the par value of $0.0001 per share.

A. Preferred Stock.  The Board of Directors is expressly granted authority to issue shares of the Preferred Stock, in one or more series, and to fix for each such series such voting powers, full or limited, and such designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights and such qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof as shall be stated and expressed in the resolution or resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors providing for the issue of such series (a “Preferred Stock Designation”) and as may be permitted by the GCL. The number of authorized shares of Preferred Stock may be increased or decreased (but not below the number of shares thereof then outstanding) by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of all of the then outstanding shares of the capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class, without a separate vote of the holders of the Preferred Stock, or any series thereof, unless a vote of any such holders is required pursuant to any Preferred Stock Designation.

B. Common Stock.  Except as otherwise required by law or as otherwise provided in any Preferred Stock Designation, the holders of the Common Stock shall exclusively possess all voting power and each share of Common Stock shall have one vote.”

3. The amendment herein was authorized in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the GCL in a special meeting of the holders of the outstanding stock entitled to vote thereon.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be executed by a duly authorized officer on this ______ day of _______________, 2013.

PHARMATHENE, INC.

By:   
Name:
Title:

H-1


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART II
 
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS

Item 20. Indemnification of Directors and Officers

PharmAthene is a Delaware corporation subject to the applicable indemnification provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law or DGCL. Under Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, each director and officer of PharmAthene may be indemnified by PharmAthene against all expenses and liabilities (including attorney’s fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement) actually or reasonably incurred in connection with the defense or settlement of any threatened, pending or completed legal proceedings in which he or she is involved by reason of the fact that he or she is or was a director or officer of PharmAthene if such director or officer acted in good faith and in a manner that he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of PharmAthene and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, if he or she had no reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was unlawful. If the legal proceeding, however, is by or in the right of PharmAthene, the director or officer may not be indemnified in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which he or she shall have been adjudged to be liable to PharmAthene unless a court determines otherwise.

PharmAthene's Certificate of Incorporation limits the liability of its directors to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law. Specifically, Article VIII of PharmAthene's Certificate of Incorporation provides that no director of PharmAthene will be personally liable to PharmAthene or its stockholders for monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary duty by such a director as a director, except for liability (i) for any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to PharmAthene or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) under Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or (iv) for any transaction from which such director derived an improper personal benefit. If the Delaware General Corporation Law is amended to authorize corporate action further eliminating or limiting the personal liability of directors, then the liability of a director of PharmAthene will be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law as so amended. No amendment to or repeal of Article VIII, Paragraph A will adversely affect any right or protection of a director of PharmAthene with respect to events occurring prior to the time of such repeal or modification.

PharmAthene's Certificate of Incorporation provides for indemnification of PharmAthene's directors and officers. Specifically, Article VIII provides that PharmAthene will indemnify, to the fullest extent authorized or permitted by Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, as the same exists or may thereafter be amended, all persons whom it may indemnify pursuant thereto.

The Merger Agreement provides that the combined company will continue to indemnify and hold harmless each present and former director or officer of PharmAthene, with respect to acts or omissions occurring or alleged to have occurred at or prior to completion of the merger, including advancing expenses, to the fullest extent permitted under applicable law and PharmAthene's Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws. The Merger Agreement also provides that the combined company will honor all indemnification agreements in place with each present and former director or officer of PharmAthene. The Merger Agreement provides that the combined company will continue to indemnify and hold harmless each present and former director, officer, or employee of Theraclone, with respect to acts or omissions occurring or alleged to have occurred at or prior to completion of the merger, including advancing expenses, to the fullest extent allowed by applicable law. In addition, all rights to indemnification with respect to acts or omissions occurring at or prior to completion of the merger existing in favor of each present and former director, officer, or employee of Theraclone as provided in Theraclone’s Certificate of Incorporation, Theraclone’s Bylaws, or indemnification agreements will remain in effect. The Merger Agreement also provides that, prior to completion of the merger, PharmAthene will purchase and maintain for a period of six years following completion of the merger, a directors' and officers' liability “tail” insurance policy covering the present and former directors and officers of PharmAthene and Theraclone for events occurring prior to completion of the merger. Such policy must contain terms no less favorable than the policies maintained by PharmAthene and Theraclone prior to completion of the merger.

II-1


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PharmAthene has entered into agreements with its directors and officers regarding indemnification, in addition to indemnification provided for in PharmAthene's Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaws and the Delaware General Corporation Law and intends to enter into indemnification agreements with any new directors and officers in the future. Under these agreements, PharmAthene is required to indemnify its current and former directors and officers against expenses, judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred, including expenses of a derivative action, in connection with an actual or threatened proceeding if any of them may be made a party because he or she is or was one of PharmAthene's directors or officers. PharmAthene will be obligated to pay these amounts only if the director or officer acted in good faith and in a manner that he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to PharmAthene's best interests. With respect to any criminal proceeding, PharmAthene will be obligated to pay these amounts only if the director or officer had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful. The indemnification agreements also set forth procedures that will apply in the event of a claim for indemnification.

PharmAthene maintains an insurance policy for its directors and officers pursuant to which its directors and officers are insured against liability for certain actions in their capacity as directors and officers of PharmAthene.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to PharmAthene's directors, officers or persons controlling PharmAthene pursuant to the foregoing provisions, PharmAthene is aware that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission that this indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is therefore unenforceable.

Item 21. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a) Exhibits Index.

See exhibit index immediately following the signature page to this Registration Statement on Form S-4, which is incorporated herein by reference.

(b) Financial Statement Schedules.

Not applicable.

(c) Report, Opinion or Appraisals

Not applicable.

Item 22. Undertakings

(a) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:

(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:

(i) to include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933;

(ii) to reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20 percent change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement; and

(iii) to include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement.

II-2


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

(3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.

(b) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that, for purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each filing of the registrant's annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (and, where applicable, each filing of an employee benefit plan's annual report pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that is incorporated by reference into the registration statement shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

(c) The undersigned registrant undertakes as follows:

(1) that prior to any public reoffering of the securities registered hereunder through use of a prospectus which is a part of this registration statement, by any person or party who is deemed to be an underwriter within the meaning of Rule 145(c), the issuer undertakes that such reoffering prospectus will contain the information called for by the applicable registration form with respect to reofferings by persons who may be deemed underwriters, in addition to the information called for by the other items of the applicable form.

(2) that every prospectus (i) that is filed pursuant to paragraph (1) immediately preceding, or (ii) that purports to meet the requirements of Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and is used in connection with an offering of securities subject to Rule 415, will be filed as a part of an amendment to the registration statement and will not be used until such amendment is effective, and that, for purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

(d) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

(e) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to respond to requests for information that is incorporated by reference into the prospectus pursuant to Items 4, 10(b), 11 or 13 of this form, within one business day of receipt of such request, and to send the incorporated documents by first-class mail or other equally prompt means. This includes information contained in documents filed subsequent to the effective date of the registration statement through the date of responding to the request.

(f) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to supply by means of a post-effective amendment all information concerning a transaction, and the company being acquired involved therein, that was not the subject of and included in the registration statement when it became effective.

II-3


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Annapolis, State of Maryland on September 9, 2013.

PHARMATHENE, INC.

By /s/ Eric I. Richman

Eric I. Richman
Chief Executive Officer

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints jointly and severally, Eric I. Richman, Linda L. Chang and Jordan P. Karp, and each one of them acting singly, as the person’s true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for the person and in the person's name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) to this registration statement and any additional registration statements filed pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as the person might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities indicated, on the dates indicated.

   
Name and Signature   Title   Date
/s/ Eric I. Richman
Eric I. Richman
  Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
  September 9, 2013
/s/ Linda L. Chang
Linda L. Chang
  Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial and accounting officer)
  September 9, 2013
/s/ Mitchel B. Sayare, Ph.D.
Mitchel B. Sayare, Ph.D.
  Chairman of the Board   September 9, 2013
/s/ John M. Gill
John M. Gill
  Director   September 9, 2013
/s/ Brian A. Markison
Brian A. Markison
  Director   September 9, 2013
/s/ Joel W. McCleary
Joel W. McCleary
  Director   September 9, 2013
/s/ Jeffrey W. Runge, M.D.
Jeffrey W. Runge, M.D.
  Director   September 9, 2013
/s/ Derace L. Schaffer, M.D.
Derace L. Schaffer, M.D.
  Director   September 9, 2013
/s/ Steven St. Peter, M.D.
Steven St. Peter, M.D.
  Director   September 9, 2013     

II-4


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PHARMATHENE, INC.
 
EXHIBIT INDEX TO REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-4
EXHIBIT INDEX

         
    Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit No.   Exhibit Description   Form   Exhibit No.   Filing Date   Filed/Furnished Herewith
2.1   Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated January 19, 2007, by and among Healthcare Acquisition Corp., PAI Acquisition Corp., and PharmAthene, Inc.   8-K   2.1   01/22/2007     
2.2   Sale and Purchase Agreement, dated March 20, 2008, by and among PharmAthene, Inc. and Avecia Investments Limited, Avecia Biologics Limited and Avecia Biologics, Inc.   8-K   2.1   03/26/2008     
2.3   Amendment Agreement, dated April 2, 2008, by and among, PharmAthene, Inc., PharmAthene UK Limited and PharmAthene US Corporation and Avecia Investments Limited, Avecia Biologics Limited and Avecia Biologics, Inc.   8-K   2.1   04/08/08     
2.4   Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of July 31, 2013 by and among PharmAthene, Inc., Taurus Merger Sub, Inc., Theraclone Science, Inc. and Steven Gillis, Ph.D., as Securityholders’ Representative.   8-K   2.1   08/01/2013     
3.1   Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of PharmAthene, Inc., as amended.   8-K   3.1   11/04/2009     
3.2   PharmAthene, Inc. By-laws, as amended.   8-K   3.1   05/02/2008     
4.1   PharmAthene, Inc. Specimen Unit Certificate.   S-1   4.1   05/06/2005     
4.2   PharmAthene, Inc. Specimen Common Stock Certificate.   8-K/A   4.2   09/24/2007     
4.3   Amendment to Unit Purchase Option by and between PharmAthene, Inc. and Maxim Partners, LLC dated January 28, 2007.   8-K   4.1   01/25/2007     
4.4   Form of PharmAthene, Inc. Warrant in connection with Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of March 23, 2009.   8-K   10.2   03/27/2009     
4.5   Form of PharmAthene, Inc. Warrant in connection with Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement, as amended as of July 28, 2009.   8-K/A   4.10   08/03/2009     

II-5


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

         
    Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit No.   Exhibit Description   Form   Exhibit No.   Filing Date   Filed/Furnished Herewith
4.6   Form of PharmAthene, Inc. Warrant in connection with Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of April 7, 2010.   8-K   10.2   04/08/2010     
4.7   Form of PharmAthene, Inc. Warrant in connection with Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of July 20, 2010.   8-K   10.2   07/20/2010     
4.8   Form of PharmAthene, Inc. Warrant in connection with Subscription Agreement dated as of June 10, 2011.   8-K   10.2   06/10/2011     
4.9   Form of PharmAthene, Inc. Warrant in connection with Loan and Security Agreement, dated March 30, 2012.   8-K   10.2   04/03/2012     
5.1*   Opinion of Dentons US LLP                    
8.1*   Opinion of Dentons US LLP regarding tax matters                    
8.2*   Opinion of Fenwick & West LLP regarding tax matters                    
10.1   Controlled Equity OfferingSM Sales Agreement between PharmAthene, Inc. and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. dated March 25, 2013.   8-K   10.1   03/25/2013     
10.2   Form of Theraclone Sciences, Inc. Voting and Lock-Up Agreement dated as of July 31, 2013.   8-K   10.2   08/01/2013     
10.3   Form of Board Composition Agreement.   8-K   10.3   08/01/2013     
10.4   Form of Registration Rights Agreement among PharmAthene, Inc. and the Initial Stockholders.   S-1   10.4   05/06/2005     
10.5   Form of Post-Closing Lockup Agreement.   8-K   10.4   08/01/2013     
10.6   Form of PharmAthene Voting and Lock-Up Agreement dated as of July 31, 2013.   8-K   10.1   08/01/2013     
10.9   Form of Registration Rights Agreement by and among Healthcare Acquisition Corp. and the former stockholders and note holders of PharmAthene, Inc.   8-K   10.1   01/22/2007     
10.12   PharmAthene, Inc. Amended and Restated 2007 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan.   14A   Appendix B   05/15/2008     

II-6


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

         
    Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit No.   Exhibit Description   Form   Exhibit No.   Filing Date   Filed/Furnished Herewith
10.23   Collaboration Agreement, dated November 29, 2004, by and between PharmAthene, Inc. and Medarex, Inc.   8-K/A   10.23   09/24/2007     
10.28   Office Lease, dated September 14, 2006, by and between PharmAthene, Inc. and Park Place Trust, as amended by First Amendment to Office Lease, dated January 22, 2007.   8-K/A   10.28   09/24/2007     
10.28.2   Second Amendment to Office Lease, by and between PharmAthene, Inc. and Park Place Trust, dated September 16, 2008.   10-K   10.26.2   03/31/2011     
10.30   Form of PharmAthene Inc. Executive Employment Agreement.   10-Q   10.30   08/14/2008     
10.30.1   Employment Agreement, dated April 18, 2008, by and between Eric Richman and PharmAthene, Inc.   10-K   10.30.1   03/26/2010     
10.30.3   Amendment, dated as of May 18, 2010, to Employment Agreement, dated as of April 18, 2008, by and between Eric I. Richman and PharmAthene, Inc.   8-K   10.30.3   05/24/2010     
10.30.4   Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of December 23, 2010, between PharmAthene, Inc. and Eric I. Richman.   8-K   10.1   12/30/2010     
10.30.5   Employment Agreement, dated April 5, 2010, by and between Thomas Fuerst and PharmAthene, Inc.   10-K   10.30.5   03/31/2010     
10.30.6   Form of PharmAthene, Inc. Executive Restricted Stock Award Agreement.   10-Q   10.30.6   05/11/2011     
10.30.7   Form of PharmAthene, Inc. Executive Stock Option Agreement.   10-Q   10.30.7   05/11/2011     
10.30.8   Form of PharmAthene, Inc. Director Stock Option Agreement.   10-Q   10.30.8   05/11/2011     
10.30.9   Employment Agreement, dated June 30, 2008, by and between Jordan P. Karp and PharmAthene, Inc.   10-K   10.30.9   03/14/2013     
10.30.10   Employment Agreement, dated February 7, 2012, by and between Linda Chang and PharmAthene, Inc.   10-K   10.30.10   03/14/2013     
10.31   Form of PharmAthene Inc. Confidentiality and Non-Solicitation Agreement.   10-Q   10.31   08/14/2008     

II-7


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

         
    Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit No.   Exhibit Description   Form   Exhibit No.   Filing Date   Filed/Furnished Herewith
10.33   Master Service Agreement, dated December 15, 2004, between Avecia Limited and the Secretary of State for Defence, acting through the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL).   10-Q/A   10.33   08/19/2008     
10.34   Master Service Agreement, dated August 18, 2005, between Avecia Limited and DSTL.   10-Q/A   10.34   08/19/2008     
10.35   Manufacturing Licence Agreement, dated June 20, 2006, between Avecia Limited and DSTL.   10-Q/A   10.35   08/19/2008     
10.36.1   Amended and Restated Manufacturing and Marketing License Agreement between the Secretary of State for Defence as represented by the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL) and PharmAthene UK Ltd. in respect of Recombinant [***] Vaccine, dated February 11, 2009.   10-Q   10.36.1   05/15/2009     
10.37   Letter Agreement, dated March 20, 2008, between Avecia Biologics Limited and DSTL.   10-Q/A   10.37   08/19/2008     
10.37.1   Amended and Restated Licence Agreement between the Secretary of State for Defence as represented by the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL) and PharmAthene UK Ltd. in respect of Recombinant [***] Vaccine, dated February 5, 2009.   10-Q   10.37.1   05/15/2009     
10.44   Contract with the National Institutes of Health for the Production and Testing of Anthrax Recombinant Protective Antigen (rPA) Vaccine (#N01-AI-30052), or NIH Prime Contract-Anthrax, dated September 29, 2003.   10-K   10.44   03/31/2009     
10.45   Amendments 1 through 13 to the NIH Prime Contract-Anthrax.   10-K   10.45   03/31/2009     
10.45.1   Modification (Amendment) 16 to the Contract with the National Institutes of Health for the Production and Testing of Anthrax Recombinant Protective Antigen (rPA) Vaccine (#N01-AI-30052).   10-Q   10.45.1   11/13/2009     

II-8


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

         
    Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit No.   Exhibit Description   Form   Exhibit No.   Filing Date   Filed/Furnished Herewith
10.45.2   Modification (Amendment) 18 to the Contract with the National Institutes of Health for the Production and Testing of Anthrax Recombinant Protective Antigen (rPA) Vaccine (HHSO100200900203C).   10-Q   10.45.2   03/31/2011     
10.48   Form of PharmAthene, Inc. Indemnification Agreement.   8-K   10.45   01/27/2009     
10.49   Form of Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of March 23, 2009 between PharmAthene, Inc. and the Purchasers party thereto.   8-K   10.1   03/27/2009  

10.51   Form of Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2009, by and among PharmAthene, Inc. and the investors signatories thereto, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 26, 2009 and Amendment No. 2 to Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2009.   8-K/A   10.50   08/03/2009     
10.52   Form of Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2009 by and among PharmAthene, Inc. and the investors signatories thereto.   8-K/A   10.51   08/03/2009     
10.53   Technology Transfer and Development Services Subcontract, dated as of September 17, 2009, by and between Diosynth Biotechnologies Inc. and PharmAthene, Inc.   10-Q   10.52   11/13/2009     
10.55   Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 7, 2010, between PharmAthene, Inc. and the Purchasers party thereto.   8-K   10.1   04/08/2010     
10.56   Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2010, between PharmAthene, Inc. and the Purchasers party thereto.   8-K   10.1   07/20/2010     
10.57   Form of Subscription Agreement, dated as of June 10, 2011, between PharmAthene, Inc. and the Investors party thereto.   8-K   10.1   06/10/2011     
10.58   Loan and Security Agreement, dated March 30, 2012, between General Electric Capital Corporation.   8-K   10.1   04/03/2012     

II-9


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

         
    Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit No.   Exhibit Description   Form   Exhibit No.   Filing Date   Filed/Furnished Herewith
10.59   Agreement, dated December 5, 2011, between PharmAthene Canada, Inc. and Ferme Pillar Hill Enr., regarding the sale of real estate.   10-K   10.59   03/14/2013     
10.62   Employment Agreement, dated as of April 18, 2008, between PharmAthene, Inc. and Francesca Cook.   10-Q   10.62   05/08/2013     
10.63*   Employment Agreement, dated as of ______, between PharmAthene, Inc. and Clifford J. Stocks.                    
10.64*   Lease Agreement, dated as of May 24, 2007, between Theraclone Sciences, Inc. and Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc, as amended.                    
10.65*   Development and License Agreement, dated March 11, 2010, between Theraclone Sciences, Inc. and Zenyaku Kogyo Co. Ltd.                    
10.66*   Research Collaboration Agreement, dated December 17, 2010, between Theraclone Sciences, Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Covx Technologies Ireland Limited.                    
10.67*   Research Collaboration Agreement, dated July 1, 2009, between Theraclone Sciences, Inc. and International Aids Vaccine Initiative.                    
10.68*   Amendment No. 1 to Research Collaboration Agreement, dated November 30, 2010, between Theraclone Sciences, Inc. and International Aids Vaccine Initiative.                    
10.69*   Amendment No. 2 to Research Collaboration Agreement, dated December 3, 2012, between Theraclone Sciences, Inc. and International Aids Vaccine Initiative.                    
10.70*   Credit and Security Agreement, dated March 11, 2013, between Theraclone Sciences, Inc., MidCap Funding III, LLC, and certain lenders party thereto.                    
10.71*   First Amendment to Credit and Security Agreement, dated July 15, 2013, between Theraclone Sciences, Inc., MidCap Funding III, LLC, and certain lenders party thereto.                    

II-10


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

         
    Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit No.   Exhibit Description   Form   Exhibit No.   Filing Date   Filed/Furnished Herewith
23.1   Consent of Independent Auditors                  X
23.2   Consent of Independent Registered Accounting Firm                  X
23.3*   Consent of Dentons US LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1 hereto)                    
23.4*   Consent of Dentons US LLP regarding tax matters (included in Exhibit 8.1 hereto)                    
23.5*   Consent of Fenwick & West LLP regarding tax matters (included in Exhibit 8.2 hereto)                    
24.1   Power of Attorney                  X
99.1   Form of Proxy Card for PharmAthene, Inc. Special Meeting of Stockholders                  X
99.2   Opinion of Leerink Swann LLC, financial advisor to PharmAthene, Inc. (included as Annex B to the proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation)                  X
99.3   Consent of Steven Gillis, Ph.D. to serve as director                  X
99.4   Consent of Wende S. Hutton to serve as director                  X
99.5   Consent of Clifford J. Stocks to serve as director                  X
101.INS   XBRL Instance Document                  X
101.SCH   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Scheme Document                  X
101.CAL   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Document                  X
101.DEF   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase                  X
101.LAB   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase                  X
101.PRE   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase                  X

* To be filed by amendment
(1) All exhibits and schedules to this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. PharmAthene will furnish the omitted exhibits and schedules to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(2) Confidential treatment under Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, has been granted with respect to designated portions of this document.
(3) Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to this Registration Statement on Form S-4 shall be deemed to be not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be deemed part of a registration statement, prospectus or other document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filings.

II-11


 

Exhibit 23.1

 

Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Experts” and to the use of our report dated September 6, 2013, with respect to the financial statements of Theraclone Sciences, Inc. for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, included in the Registration Statement on Form S-4 and related proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation of PharmAthene, Inc. for the registration of shares of its common stock.

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP  


Seattle, Washington

September 6, 2013

 

 

 

Exhibit 23.2

 

Consent of Independent Registered Accounting Firm

 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to the use of our report dated March 13, 2013, included in the Proxy Statement of PharmAthene, Inc. that is made a part of the Registration Statement (Form S-4) and Prospectus of PharmAthene, Inc. for the registration of 60,316,126 shares of its common stock.

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

 

Baltimore, Maryland

September 6, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.1

FOLD AND DETACH HERE AND READ THE REVERSE SIDE

PharmAthene, Inc.
  
One Park Place

 
Annapolis, MD 21401   PROXY

For The Special Meeting To Be Held            , 2013

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY

The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Mitchel Sayare and Eric I. Richman, and each of them, attorneys and agents, with full power of substitution, to vote as proxy all the shares of Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of PharmAthene, Inc. (“PharmAthene” or the “Company”) of which the undersigned is the record holder, standing in the name of the undersigned at the Special Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held at      a.m., New York time, on     ,            , 2013 at 1301 K Street, NW, East Tower, Sixth Floor, Washington, DC 20005, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, in accordance with the instructions noted below, and with discretionary authority with respect to such other matters as may properly come before such meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

This Proxy will be voted in accordance with the stockholder’s specifications hereon. In the absence of any such specification, this Proxy will be voted:

“FOR” proposal to approve the issuance of PharmAthene common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, in the merger contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 31, 2013, by and among PharmAthene, Inc., Theraclone Sciences, Inc., Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of PharmAthene, and Steven Gillis, Ph.D., as Securityholders’ Representative;
“FOR” proposal to approve an amendment to PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of common stock that PharmAthene may issue by 75,000,000, from 100,000,000 to 175,000,000;
“FOR” approval of each nominee for director to serve as a director until PharmAthene’s next annual meeting of stockholders or until his or her respective successor is elected and qualified;
“FOR” proposal to approve an amendment to PharmAthene’s Bylaws to require, for a period to expire no later than July 31, 2015, the approval of at least 66 2/3% of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors to remove Clifford J. Stocks, the expected Chief Executive Officer of PharmAthene upon completion of the merger; and
“FOR” proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of any of the proposals.

If any other business is presented at the Special Meeting, this proxy will be voted by the above-named proxies at the direction of a majority of the Board of Directors. At the present time, the Board of Directors knows of no other business to be presented at the Special Meeting. In addition, if the Special Meeting is required to be adjourned for any reason, this proxy will be voted by the above-named proxies at the direction of a majority of the Board of Directors.

(Continued, and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side)


 
 

FOLD AND DETACH HERE AND READ THE REVERSE SIDE

PROXY

Please mark your votes like this x

The undersigned hereby revokes any proxies heretofore given and directs said attorneys to act or vote as follows:

     
1. Proposal to approve the issuance of PharmAthene common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, in the merger contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 31, 2013, by and among PharmAthene, Inc., Theraclone Sciences, Inc., Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of PharmAthene, and Steven Gillis, Ph.D., as Securityholders’ Representative.   o For   o Against   o Abstain

     
2. Proposal to approve an amendment to PharmAthene’s Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of common stock that PharmAthene may issue by 75,000,000, from 100,000,000 to 175,000,000.   o For   o Against   o Abstain

3. Election of Directors:

01 Mitchel B. Sayare, Ph.D.

02 John M. Gill

03 Steve Gillis, Ph.D.

04 Wende S. Hutton

05 Brian A. Markison

06 Eric I. Richman

07 Clifford J. Stocks

08 Derace L. Schaffer, M.D.

09

o Vote FOR all nominees listed (except as marked)
 
o Vote WITHHOLD AUTHORITY to vote for all nominees listed


 
 

 
FOR all nominees listed, except that authority to vote withheld for the following nominee(s):
Write the number(s) of the nominee(s) in the box provided to the right.
  o

     
4. Proposal to approve an amendment to PharmAthene’s Bylaws to require, for a period to expire no later than July 31, 2015, the approval of at least 66 2/3% of PharmAthene’s Board of Directors to remove Clifford J. Stocks, the expected Chief Executive Officer of PharmAthene upon completion of the merger.   o For   o Against   o Abstain

     
5. Proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, if a quorum is present, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of any of the proposals.   o For   o Against   o Abstain

COMPANY ID:

PROXY NUMBER:

ACCOUNT NUMBER:

Date   
Signature   
Signature   

NOTE:  When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When signing as attorney, trustee, administrator, executor, guardian, etc., please indicate your full title as such. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by President or other authorized officer, giving full title as such. If a partnership, please sign in full partnership name by authorized person.

Please complete and date this proxy and return it promptly
in the enclosed postage-prepaid envelope.


 

Exhibit 99.3

 

CONSENT OF STEVEN GILLIS, PH.D.

 

In accordance with Rule 438 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the undersigned hereby consents to being named in the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed by PharmAthene, Inc. (“PharmAthene”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 9, 2013, and all supplements and amendments thereto (the “Registration Statement”), as a person anticipated to become a director of PharmAthene effective upon the completion of the merger as described in the Registration Statement.

 

  /s/ Steven Gillis
  Name: Steven Gillis, Ph.D.
  Date: September 9, 2013

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.4

 

CONSENT OF WENDE S. HUTTON

 

In accordance with Rule 438 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the undersigned hereby consents to being named in the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed by PharmAthene, Inc. (“PharmAthene”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 9, 2013, and all supplements and amendments thereto (the “Registration Statement”), as a person anticipated to become a director of PharmAthene effective upon the completion of the merger as described in the Registration Statement. 

 

  /s/ Wende S. Hutton
  Name: Wende S. Hutton
  Date: September 9, 2013

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 99.5

 

CONSENT OF CLIFFORD J. STOCKS

 

In accordance with Rule 438 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the undersigned hereby consents to being named in the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed by PharmAthene, Inc. (“PharmAthene”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 9, 2013, and all supplements and amendments thereto (the “Registration Statement”), as a person anticipated to become a director of PharmAthene effective upon the completion of the merger as described in the Registration Statement. 

 

  /s/ Clifford J. Stocks
  Name: Clifford J. Stocks
  Date: September 9, 2013